Jump to
Abstract
Objective— Foam cell (FC) formation by oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL) accumulation in macrophages is crucial for development of atherosclerosis. Hypoxia has been demonstrated in atherosclerosis and hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) has been shown to promote intraplaque angiogenesis and FC development. As hypoxia induces HIF-1α stabilization and adenosine (ado) accumulation, we investigated whether this nucleoside regulates HIF-1α in FCs.
Methods and Results— Ado, under hypoxia, stimulates HIF-1α accumulation by activating all adenosine receptors (ARs). HIF-1α modulation involved extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK 1/2), p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38 MAPK), and protein kinase B (Akt) phosphorylation in the case of A1, A2A, A2B, and ERK 1/2 phosphorylation in the case of A3 receptors. Ado, through the activation of A3 and A2B receptors, stimulates vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) secretion in a HIF-1α–dependent way. Furthermore, ado, through the A2B subtype, induces an increase of Interleukin-8 (IL-8) secretion in a ERK 1/2, p38, and Akt kinase–dependent but not HIF-1α–mediated way. Finally, ado stimulates FC formation, and this effect is strongly reduced by A3 and A2B blockers and by HIF-1α silencing.
Conclusions— This study provides the first evidence that A3, A2B, or mixed A3/A2B antagonists may be useful to block important steps in the atherosclerotic plaque development ado-induced.
Macrophage foam cell formation is an important process in atherosclerotic plaque development.1 Atherosclerosis is initiated by dysfunction of endothelial cells at lesion-prone sites in the walls of arteries, which results in monocyte infiltration into the arterial intima. These cells differentiated into macrophages, which then internalize large amounts of oxidized low-density lipoprotein forming cholesterol-laden macrophages called “foam cells” (FCs), which in turn give rise to fatty streaks in the arterial wall.2 As the atherosclerotic lesion develops, the arterial wall thickness increases and oxygen diffusion into the intima is markedly reduced. These hypoxic regions contain large number of FCs revealing that these cells experience hypoxia during the development of atherosclerotic lesions.3–4 Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), the most important factor involved in the cellular response to hypoxia, is a heterodimeric transcription factor composed of an inducibly expressed HIF-1α subunit and a constitutively-expressed HIF-1β subunit.5 It is well established that HIF plays a major role in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression and angiogenesis, mediating important alterations associated with atherogenesis and angiogenic activity of macrophages.6–7 Moreover, under atherogenic conditions, the high expression of HIF-1 in macrophages promotes FC formation and atherosclerosis.8
Recently, it has been shown that another angiogenic chemokine, interleukin-8 (IL-8), is upregulated by FCs located in hypoxic areas in rabbit and human atherosclerotic plaques.4 Hypoxia-induced secretion of IL-8 from FCs may lead to the recruitment of smooth muscle, vascular endothelial, and T cells into the atherosclerotic plaques and thus to plaque progression.9 It has been also demonstrated that in vascular endothelium, under hypoxia, IL-8 expression is increased by HIF.10,11 However, the relationships between HIF and IL-8 has been questioned by other authors.12
Adenosine (Ado) is a proangiogenic purine nucleoside released from ischemic and hypoxic tissues. Under these conditions, it is released into the extracellular space and signals through the stimulation of 4 extracellular G protein–coupled receptors named A1, A2A, A2B, and A3 (ARs).13 All 4 adenosine subtypes have been recently associated to the modulation of angiogenesis. Therefore, because of the link between ado, inflammation, and angiogenesis and the increasing evidence that these factors play a role in atherogenesis, we thought to investigate HIF-1α, VEGF, IL-8, and FC formation by ado receptors in human macrophages and in an in vitro model of human FCs.14
Methods
Please see the supplemental materials (available online at http://atvb.ahajournals.org) for more detailed methods.
Cell Culture
The human myelomonocytic cell line U937 was obtained from ATCC and maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, L-glutamine (2 mmol/L), 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, at 37C° in 5% CO2/95% air.
Preparation of Human Macrophages From Peripheral Blood
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from buffy coats by the Ficoll-Hypaque gradient.15 Monocytes were selected by adhesion in RPMI 1640 medium containing 2 mmol/L glutamine, 5% human AB serum, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin and differentiated into human macrophages (HMs) by adhesion over 7 days.
Hypoxic Treatment
Hypoxic exposures were done in a modular incubator chamber and flushed with a gas mixture containing 1% O2, 5% CO2 and balance N2 (MiniGalaxy, RSBiotech).
FC Formation
U937 cells were induced to differentiate into HMs by treatment with 40 nmol/L PMA for 72 hours and then incubated with oxLDL to form FCs (Intracel).16 Then all treatments to the cells with ado were carried out in the presence of the adenosine deaminase (ADA) inhibitor, EHNA 5 μmol/L, and those with ado agonists were performed in the presence of ADA.
Real-Time RT-PCR
Total cytoplasmic RNA was extracted and quantitative real-time RT-PCR assay were performed as previously reported.17–18
Binding Experiments
Binding assays were carried out as we previously reported.18
Western Blot Analysis
Detection of adenosine receptors, HIF-1α, HIF-2α, and phosphorylated proteins was carried out as we previously described.19 Immunoreactivity was assessed and quantified by using a VersaDoc Imaging System (Bio-Rad).
HIF-1 DNA Binding Activity
Nuclear extracts from U937, FCs, and HMs were prepared by using the Nuclear Extract Kit (Active Motif), and HIF-1α–binding activities in the nuclear extracts were detected by using an ELISA-based HIF binding kit (TransAM HIF-1, Active Motif) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations.
ELISA
The levels of VEGF and IL-8 protein secreted by the cells in the medium were determined by VEGF and IL-8 ELISA kits (R&D Systems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Knockdown of ARs and HIF-1α by siRNA
Transfection of siRNA was performed at a concentration of 100 nmol/L using Lipofection 2000 in Opti-MEM (Invitrogen). A nonspecific random control ribonucleotide sense strand (5′-ACU CUA UCU GCA CGC UGA CdTdT-3′) and antisense strand (5′-dTdT UGA GAU AGA CGU GCG ACU G-3′) were used under identical conditions as we already reported.19
Oil Red O Stain Analysis
Oil red O (in 60% isopropanol) staining was done for 15 minutes.20 Cells were viewed under a bright-field microscope in 100× fields using a Nikon Eclipse E800 microscope. The number of foam cells formed under each condition were calculated manually and presented as percentage foam cell formation.
Statistical Analysis
All values in the figures and text are expressed as mean±SE of n observation (with n≥3). Data sets were examined by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Dunnett test (when required). A probability value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Expression of ARs mRNA in U937, HMs, and FCs
mRNA expression of ARs was evaluated in U937, HMs, and FCs in normoxia and hypoxia. Hypoxia induced a significant increase of A2BARs in all the 3 cellular models investigated, while it did not change the level of the other ARs (supplemental Figure IA through ID).
Expression of ARs Protein in U937 Cells, HMs, and FCs
The protein evaluation of all ARs was examined, through immunoblots, in U937, HMs, and FCs in normoxia and hypoxia. We observed the presence of all ARs in the cells investigated according to mRNA data, as reported in supplemental Figure IE through IH. These results were also confirmed by [3H]DPCPX, [3H]ZM 241385, [3H]MRE 2029F20, and [3H]MRE 3008F20 radioligands, used in receptor binding studies to evaluate affinity and density values of A1, A2A, A2B, and A3 ARs, respectively (supplemental Table I).
Ado Induces HIF-1α Protein Accumulation
To evaluate the effect of ado on HIF-1α protein accumulation, FCs, HMs, (Figure 1A and 1B, respectively) and U937 cells (supplemental Figure IIA) were incubated with ado 100 μmol/L in normoxia and hypoxia. In hypoxia ado stimulated HIF-1α accumulation, time-dependently, in all cells investigated. As for normoxia, ado effect slightly appears after 24 hours in FCs, whereas HIF-1α protein was undetectable in HMs and in U937 cells. In FCs the effect was similar with 50 or 100 μg/mL of oxLDL (data not shown), therefore the concentration of 50 μg/mL was used in all experiments. No changes in cell viability were observed after treatment of cells with ado 100 μmol/L for 24 hour of hypoxia (data not shown). Furthermore, treatment of ado stimulated, in a time-dependent way, HIF-1α DNA binding activity in hypoxia and also induced a minor but statistically significant effect in normoxia in FCs, HMs (Figure 1C–D) and U937 cells (supplemental Figure IIB). Ado did not affect HIF-1α mRNA levels in normoxia and after 2 hours hypoxia, whereas it induced a slight increase of 1.6±0.1-, 1.9±0.1-, and 1.5±0.1-fold after 4, 8, 24 hours of hypoxia, respectively (P<0.05 versus control); after addition of actinomycin D (actD), ado did not increase HIF-1α mRNA excluding a role in mRNA stability (supplemental Figure IIIA). The lack of mRNA modulation after 2 hours, time at which ado start to affect protein increase, suggests that ado does not affect transcription. Furthermore, we evaluated the ado-induced regulation of HIF-2α in hypoxia. Supplemental Figure IIIB shows that ado slightly increased HIF-2α, and this effect was blocked by actD suggesting that at variance with HIF-1α, HIF-2α was transcriptionally regulated by ado.
Figure 1. Time course of HIF-1α modulation induced by ado. Effect of 100 μmol/L Ado on HIF-1α protein expression (A and B) and DNA binding activity (C and D) in FCs and HMs, respectively, in normoxia (N) and hypoxia (H). HIF-1β shows equal loading protein. Densitometric quantification of HIF-1α Western blots is the mean±SE values (n=3); *P<0.05 compared with 24-hour normoxia in FCs or with 2-hour hypoxia in HMs in the absence of Ado; #P<0.05 compared with cells in the absence of Ado at each time. DNA binding activity data are means±SE (n=3); *P<0.05 compared with 24-hour normoxia in FCs or with 4-hour normoxia in HMs in the absence of Ado; #P<0.05 compared with cells in the absence of Ado at each time.
Then we investigated the ado modulation of HIF-1α protein stability in hypoxia and normoxia. Ado in normoxia, at variance with hypoxia, increases HIF-1α stability; furthermore rapamycin, inhibitor of mTOR pathway, reduced ado effect suggesting also an increase in translation (supplemental Figure IVA through IVC). However, as the ado effect on HIF-1 was most evident in hypoxia, all the other experiments were carried out in this condition for 4 hours.
Involvement of ARs in Ado-Induced HIF-1α Expression
To evaluate which AR was involved in the ado-induced HIF-1α expression we treated FCs with antagonists of ARs before addition of ado in hypoxia. As shown in Figure 2A the ado effect was partially antagonized by 100 nmol/L DPCPX, SCH 58261, MRE 2029F20, and MRE 3008F20 suggesting the involvement of A1, A2A, A2B, and A3 ARs, respectively. Therefore we evaluated the effect of high affinity agonists, CHA, CGS 21680, Compound 24,21 and Cl-IB-MECA on HIF-1α accumulation. Probes selectivity is provided in supplemental Table II. All the agonists were able to induce HIF-1α in FCs (Figure 2B). Analogous results were obtained in U937 cells and in HMs (data not shown). Therefore in the second part of the work we focused our attention on FCs.
Figure 2. Effect of AR ligands and AR silencing on HIF-1α protein increase. Effect of Ado on HIF-1α protein accumulation and antagonism by 100 nmol/L MRE 3008F20 (selective A3 antagonist), SCH 58261 (selective A2A antagonist), DPCPX (A1 antagonist), and MRE 2029F20 (selective A2B antagonist; A). HIF-1α accumulation in the absence (line 1, control) and in the presence of AR agonists (nmol/L) 10, 100 CHA (A1 agonist, lines 2, 3); 500, 1000 CGS 21680 (A2A agonist, lines 4, 5); 10, 100 Compound 24 (A2B agonist, lines 6,7); 10, 100 Cl-IB-MECA (A3 agonist, lines 8, 9; B). Ado effect on HIF-1α in the absence (line 2) and in the presence of siRNA of A1, A2A, A2B, A3 ARs (lines 3, 4, 5, 6, respectively); Ado effect in the presence of siRNA of A1, A2A, A2B, A3 ARs together (siAdoRs; line 7); cells transfected with control (C) ribonucleotides for 72 hours (line 1; C). Densitometric quantification of Western blots is the mean±SE values (n=3); *P<0.05 compared with the control; **P<0.05 compared with Ado.
To further ascertain the involvement of the different ARs in the ado-induced HIF-1α accumulation we knocked-down ARs. After 48 and 72 hours posttransfection with siRNA targeting each AR, mRNA and protein levels were significantly reduced; the specificity of a given siRNA to the other AR subtypes is also shown in supplemental Figure V. Treatment of cells with siRNAs for A1, A2A, A2B, and A3 subtypes reduced the effect of ado on HIF-1α modulation supporting again a role for all ado subtypes in this effect; silencing of all ARs together abrogated the ado-mediated increase of HIF-1α protein (Figure 2C).
Involvement of MAPK and Akt Pathways in ARs-Induced Modulation of HIF-1α
To investigate the role of MAPK and Akt kinases in ARs-induced HIF-1α accumulation, we performed experiments with U0126, SB202190, and SH-5, inhibitors of MEK1/2, p38 MAPK, and Akt, respectively, in FCs. All the blockers were able to abrogate the effect induced by A1, A2A and A2B agonists, whereas the A3-mediated HIF-1α accumulation was antagonized only by U0126 (Figure 3A). Addition of CHA, CGS 21680, and Compound 24 induced a concentration-dependent increase of pERK1/2, pp38, and pAkt, whereas Cl-IB-MECA was involved only in ERK1/2 phosphorylation (Figure 3B).
Figure 3. Role of intracellular kinases in HIF-1α modulation induced by AR activation. FCs were treated with nmol/L 100 CHA, 500 CGS 21680, 100 Compound 24, 100 Cl-IB-MECA in the absence (lines 5, 9, 13, 17, respectively) and in the presence of (1 μmol/L) U0126 (lines 6, 10, 14, 18, respectively), SB202190 (lines 7, 11, 15, 19, respectively), SH-5 (lines 8, 12, 16, 20). Line 1 (control), line 2 (U0126), line 3 (SB202190), line 4 (SH-5; A). Effect of ado agonists (nmol/L) 10, 100 CHA (lines 2, 3); 500, 1000 CGS 21680 (lines 4, 5); 10, 100 Compound 24 (lines 6, 7); 10, 100 Cl-IB-MECA (lines 8, 9) on ERK1/2, p38 and Akt phosphorylation (B). Densitometric quantification of Western blots is the mean±SE values (n=4); *P<0.05 compared with the control.
ARs Induce VEGF Increase in Hypoxia
We tested VEGF production by FCs after ado treatment for 24 hours of hypoxia. Ado 100 μmol/L increased VEGF levels of 165±10%, and the effect was strongly reduced by MRE 2029F20 and MRE 3008F20 100 nmol/L suggesting the involvement of A2B and A3ARs and inhibited to a lesser extent by the A2A antagonist (Figure 4A). DPCPX 100 nmol/L produce a moderate blunting of ado-induced VEGF release, but at this concentration it can have antagonistic actions against A2B receptors (see supplemental Table II). Indeed a lower dose of DPCPX 10 nmol/L did not reduce ado effect (161±10%). U0126 and SB202190 followed by SH-5 were able to block the ado increase on VEGF levels. Treatment of the cells with siRNA of HIF-1α abrogated the VEGF increase induced by ado suggesting that the nucleoside was acting through HIF-1α modulation (Figure 4B). The increase induced by ado 100 μmol/L on VEGF was also observed at mRNA level (2.4±0.20fold of increase, P<0.05 versus control). Other HIF-1α–responsive genes, aldolase and PGK were increased at mRNA level after ado treatment for 24 hours of 4.5±0.2- and 1.8±0.2-fold, respectively, and the effect was abrogated in the presence of HIF-1α siRNA, 1.1±0.1- and 1.0±0.1-fold, respectively (P<0.05 versus control).
Figure 4. Effect of ado on VEGF and IL-8 secretion. VEGF and IL-8 levels in FCs treated with 100 μmol/L Ado in the absence and in the presence of 100 nmol/L DPCPX, SCH 58261, MRE 3008F20, and MRE 2029F20 (A and C). Role of 1 μmol/L ERK1/2, p38, Akt inhibitors, and siRNA of HIF-1α in VEGF secretion induced by Ado (B); siRNA of HIF-1α was compared with cells transfected with control ribonucleotides for 72 hours (-siRNA). Role of 1 μmol/L ERK1/2, p38, Akt, and siRNA of HIF-1α and A2B receptors in IL-8 secretion induced by Ado (D). Bars are the means and vertical lines SE of the mean of 4 separate experiments performed in triplicate. *P<0.05 compared with control; #P<0.05 compared with ado.
A2BAR Induces IL-8 Increase in Hypoxia
We tested IL-8 production by FCs after ado treatment for 24 hours in hypoxia. Ado 100 μmol/L increased IL-8 levels of 158±10%, and the effect was blocked by MRE 2029F20 or A2B silencing, but not by DPCPX, SCH 58261 and MRE 3008F20 (Figure 4C and 4D). A dose–response curve of Compound 24 revealed an EC50 value of 58±6 nmol/L for stimulation of IL-8 secretion. The effect of Compound 24 1 μmol/L (142±8% of IL-8 secretion) was completely blocked by MRE 2029F20 (102±6% of IL-8 secretion). All these data suggest the involvement of A2B subtype in this response. U0126, SB202190, and SH5 were able to revert the ado increase on IL-8 levels suggesting a role for ERK 1/2, p38, and Akt pathways (Figure 4D). Finally, treatment of cells with siRNA of HIF-1α for 72 hours before stimulation with ado shows that IL-8 modulation was not affected by HIF-1α silencing (Figure 4D). IL-8 was not altered by ado at mRNA level (1.14±0.1-fold of increase versus control).
Oil Red O Staining in FCs
U937 cells without oxLDL did not contain high levels of neutral lipids and were not stained with Oil red O, a dye specific for neutral lipids (Figure 5). After treatment of U937 cells with 50 μg/mL ox-LDL for 24 hours, we observed FC formation characterized by large cytoplasmic lipid droplets. This effect was increased after incubation with ado 100 μmol/L, not significantly affected by DPCPX and SCH 58261, and strongly blocked by MRE 2029F20 and MRE 3008F20 antagonists and HIF-1α silencing, suggesting the involvement of HIF-1α and A2B and A3 ARs in the ado-induced FC formation. Also the high affinity A2B and A3 agonists were able to increase FC formation (Figure 5).
Figure 5. Induction of FC formation by the U937 cells. Cells were stained for lipids with oil red O in parallel cultures by incubation in the absence (A) or in the presence (B) of ox-LDL (50 μg/mL) followed by paraformaldehyde fixation. Effect of 100 μmol/L Ado on FC formation (C) and effect of 100 nmol/L ARs blockers (D through G) and HIF-1 silencing (H). Effect of A2B and A3 agonists on FC formation (I through L). Cells were viewed under a bright-field microscope in 100× fields using a Nikon Eclipse E800 microscope. Bar graph data, expressed as the percentage of foam cells/total number of cells plated, are the mean±SE values (n=3); *P<0.05 vs cells in the absence of oxLDL (A); #P<0.05 vs cells in the presence of oxLDL (B). Figure shows 1 representative experiment.
Discussion
Hypoxia, HIF-1, and macrophages in human atherosclerotic plaques are correlated with intraplaque angiogenesis.7,22–23 Furthermore, hypoxia stabilizes HIFs and leads to the accumulation of ado.5–24
This study reports, for the first time, that ado increases HIF-1α protein levels in U937, HMs, and FCs in hypoxia as already observed in cancer cells.19,25–26 A2B and A3 subtypes play a major role in the VEGF increase and FC formation and only the A2B is responsible for IL-8 stimulation induced by adenosine.
The normoxic modulation of HIF-1α by ado was only barely appreciated by means of western blotting experiments. However, by evaluating the HIF-1 DNA binding activity through an ELISA assay, ado was able to induce a significant increase of this response in hypoxia and a lower but significant effect in normoxia, according to the elegant study by De Ponti et al.27 This result also suggests that, in the case of low signals, ELISA approach on nuclear extract is more sensitive than Western blot on whole cell extracts.
The possibility that the nucleoside could increase HIF-1α gene expression in normoxia was rejected because of the lack of mRNA modulation induced by ado, whereas addition of the protein translation inhibitor CHX revealed an effect on protein stability that was not detectable under hypoxic conditions. Furthermore, addition of rapamycin reduced the nucleoside effect on HIF-1 DNA–binding activity in normoxia, suggesting that adenosine may play a role also in protein translation.27 In hypoxia, our results with inhibitors of transcription and translation suggest that ado stimulates HIF-1α protein levels essentially by increasing translation, as transcription and stability did not appear to be altered by the nucleoside, according to what reported in cancer cells.19,25–26
The role of ARs in the nucleoside regulation of HIF-1α was investigated by using AR blockers. DPCPX, SCH 58261, MRE 2029F20, and MRE 3008F20, used at 100 nmol/L, a dose that may be considered selective for A1, A2A, A2B, and A3 ARs,28 respectively, were able to reduce HIF-1α protein accumulation induced by ado. The involvement of all ARs was also confirmed by the increase of HIF-1α protein levels induced by high-affinity AR agonists like CHA, CGS 21680, Compound 24, and Cl-IB-MECA for A1, A2A, A2B, and A3 ARs, respectively. Furthermore, we found that silencing of A1 or A2A or A2B or A3 ARs was able to reduce HIF-1α modulation induced by ado and that the simultaneous knocking down of all 4 ARs abrogated the ado effect. Addition of oxLDL did not modify the responses of FCs versus macrophages and U937 cells, but we concentrated on FCs because the effects of ado modulation of HIF-1α in this cellular type, crucial in atherosclerosis, have not been addressed before. However, ox-LDL are recognized by different receptors than minimally-oxidized LDL (mm-LDL), and it is likely that alternative LDL ligands such as mm-LDL might have different effects, with greater relevance to atherosclerosis.29 Different receptor subtypes have been reported to play a role in the ado-induced HIF-1α accumulation depending on the cellular model investigated.9,25–27,30–32 The results of this study suggest that HIF-1α accumulation may be triggered by all ARs in FCs analogously to their effect in activating other intracellular signaling factors like ERK1/2.33 For example, the ado-induced activation of myocardial ERK1/2 by statins has been found to involve A1, A2A, and A2B ARs in mice.34
It is well known that HIF-1 expression and activity, in addition to O2 concentration, are also regulated by important signal transduction pathways including those involving ERK/MAPK and Akt.35 As these pathways are also modulated by ado, our aim was to investigate the intracellular signaling triggered by this nucleoside in HIF-1α modulation. Our results show the involvement of ERK1/2, p38 MAPK, and Akt phosphorylation, whereas the Cl-IB-MECA effect was abrogated only by U0126. Indeed A1, A2A, and A2B receptors activate ERK1/2, p38 MAPK, and Akt, whereas the A3 subtype was involved in the modulation of ERK1/2.
Several studies demonstrated a link between ado and HIF-1 at first in human cancer cell lines and then also in murine macrophages and in liver cells.19,25−26,30–31 In most of these cases its accumulation was related to an increase of VEGF, which regulates important functions associated with angiogenesis. According to these results we found that ado increased VEGF levels through A3 and A2B receptors and to a lesser extent by the A2A subtype and was dependent by HIF-1α, pERK1/2, pp38 MAPK, and pAkt. Recently, it has been reported that HIF-1 is also linked to IL-8 expression in human endothelial cells,11 whereas other authors point to different mechanisms of IL-8 regulation.12 IL-8 is another crucial angiogenic factor found to be expressed by FCs in human atheroma4,9 and is also modulated by ado in different cellular models by activation of A2BARs.36 In this study we found that ado increased IL-8 secretion in hypoxic FCs through activation of the only A2B subtype. However, in agreement with other authors, its modulation was not dependent on HIF-1α accumulation, suggesting that other transcription factors, possibly AP-1, may be involved.12 Finally, as HIF-1 has been demonstrated to promote FC formation,8 we evaluated the involvement of ado in FC development. Our results clearly demonstrate that ado increases FC formation and that this effect is strongly reduced by A3 and A2B antagonists and by silencing HIF-1α; this suggests that under hypoxic conditions, ado, by increasing HIF-1α through activation of A3 and A2B ARs, promotes FC formation. The marginal role of the A2A antagonist in the modulation of this effect may be in line with recent relevant studies carried out by Reiss and Cronstein. These authors demonstrated that A2A agonists in normoxic conditions inhibited FC formation in stimulated THP-1 macrophages by increasing expression of cholesterol 27-hydroxylase and adenosine 5′-triphosphate-binding cassette transporter A1, which are proteins involved in reverse cholesterol transport.37 The same authors demonstrated that A2A receptors were responsible for the atheroprotective effects induced by methotrexate.38 Therefore, it seems that adenosine by regulating FCs may play both anti- or proatherogenic effects, depending on the receptors activated and the oxygen conditions present.
Altogether, these data suggest that in hypoxic conditions ado, through A3 and A2B AR activation, induces HIF-1α protein accumulation thus leading to an increase of VEGF secretion and of FC formation; in addition, the A2B subtype is responsible for IL-8 accumulation. Therefore AR antagonists and in particular A3 and A2B or mixed A3/A2B blockers may be useful to block important steps in the atherosclerotic plaque development mediated by ado.
Acknowledgments
Sources of Funding
This work was supported by University of Ferrara and by “Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio” of Ferrara.
Disclosures
None.
Footnotes
-
Received October 7, 2008; revision accepted October 5, 2009.
References
This Issue
Jump to
Article Tools
Share this Article
- Adenosine Modulates HIF-1α, VEGF, IL-8, and Foam Cell Formation in a Human Model of Hypoxic Foam CellsPermalink:
