Skip to main content
  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Meet the Editors
    • ATVB Journal History
    • General Statistics
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • Cover Art Award
    • ATVB Early Career Award
    • ATVB in Focus
    • Recent Brief Reviews of ATVB
    • Lecture Series
    • Collections
    • Recent Highlights of ATVB
    • Commentaries
    • Browse Abstracts
    • Insight into ATVB Authors
  • Resources
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Online Submission/Peer Review Site
    • Council on ATVB
    • Permissions and Rights Q&A
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
    • Author Reprints
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Advanced search

Header Publisher Menu

  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Meet the Editors
    • ATVB Journal History
    • General Statistics
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • Cover Art Award
    • ATVB Early Career Award
    • ATVB in Focus
    • Recent Brief Reviews of ATVB
    • Lecture Series
    • Collections
    • Recent Highlights of ATVB
    • Commentaries
    • Browse Abstracts
    • Insight into ATVB Authors
  • Resources
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Online Submission/Peer Review Site
    • Council on ATVB
    • Permissions and Rights Q&A
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
    • Author Reprints
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
Cell Biology/Signaling

Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor-2 Regulates Expression of Smooth Muscle Alpha-Actin After Arterial Injury

Allison D. Grabski, Takuya Shimizu, Jessie Deou, William M. Mahoney, Michael A. Reidy, Guenter Daum
Download PDF
https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.191965
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2009;29:1644-1650
Originally published September 16, 2009
Allison D. Grabski
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takuya Shimizu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jessie Deou
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William M. Mahoney
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael A. Reidy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guenter Daum
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Supplemental Materials
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Supplemental Materials
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
Loading

Abstract

Objective— This study tests the hypothesis that S1P2R regulates expression of SMC differentiation genes after arterial injury.

Methods and Results— Carotid ligation injury was performed in wild-type and S1P2R-null mice. At various time points after injury, expression of multiple SMC differentiation genes, myocardin, and S1P receptors (S1P1R, S1P2R, and S1P3R) was measured by quantitative PCR. These experiments demonstrate that at day 7 after injury, S1P2R specifically regulates expression of smooth muscle α-actin (SMA) and that this is not mediated by changes in expression of myocardin or any of the S1PRs. In vitro studies using carotid SMCs prepared from wild-type and S1P2R-null mice show that S1P stimulates expression of all SMC-differentiation genes tested, but S1P2R significantly regulates expression of SMA and SM22α only. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays suggest that S1P-induced recruitment of serum response factor to the SMA promoter and enhancer largely depends on S1P2R. S1P-stimulated SMA expression requires S1P2R-dependent activation of RhoA and mobilization of calcium from intracellular stores. Chelation of calcium does not affect the activation of RhoA by S1P, whereas blockade of Rho by C3 exotoxin partially inhibits the mobilization of calcium by S1P.

Conclusions— The results of this study support the hypothesis that S1P2R regulates expression of SMA after injury. We further conclude that transcriptional regulation of SMA by S1P in vitro requires S1P2R-dependent activation of RhoA and mobilization of calcium from intracellular calcium stores.

  • sphingosine-1-phosphate
  • S1P2R
  • smooth muscle actin
  • Rho
  • calcium

Restenosis is a major complication of surgical procedures performed to restore arterial blood flow. Despite all efforts, pharmacological inhibition of restenosis has not yet been achieved. In normal arteries, smooth muscle cells (SMCs) are quiescent and regulate vascular tone. After arterial injury, medial SMCs proliferate and lose expression of genes encoding the contractile apparatus, a process referred to as phenotypic modulation.1,2 It is generally believed that decreased expression of these “differentiation genes” is instrumental for the increased proliferative potential of SMCs after injury, although the exact molecular mechanisms remain to be defined. In this study, we test the hypothesis that one of the pathways regulating phenotypic modulation after arterial injury involves the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor-2 (S1P2R).

See accompanying article on page 1439

The bioactive sphingolipid S1P is best known for its regulation of lymphocyte egress from lymphatic organs3,4 and its requirement for vessel formation in development.5 Both processes are mediated by S1P1R, one of the 5 G protein–coupled receptors that bind S1P. SMCs express 3 S1P receptors (S1P1R, S1P2R and S1P3R). Concomitant pharmacological blockade of S1P1R and S1P3R inhibits neointimal growth in balloon-injured rat carotid arteries,6 suggesting a lesion-promoting role for S1P. Consistent with this conclusion, increased S1P concentrations in human serum were found to be highly predictive for the onset and progression of coronary artery disease.7 In contrast, we have recently suggested an inhibitory role for S1P in arterial lesion growth based on our observation that S1P2R-null mice but not their wild-type littermates develop large intimal lesions after carotid injury.8 In this study, medial proliferation was increased in S1P2R-null arteries compared to wild-type arteries, indicating that S1P2R prevents SMC proliferation.8 In addition to SMC migration and proliferation, S1P has been shown to induce expression of SMC differentiation genes such as smooth muscle α-actin (SMA), and this effect has been ascribed to activation of Rho.9,10 Activation of most promoters of SMC differentiation genes require binding of the transcription factor serum response factor (SRF) in combination with myocardin or a myocardin-related-transcription factor (MRTF) as a cofactor.1,11,12 Upon activation of Rho and stimulation of actin polymerization, cytosolic MRTF is released from G-actin and translocates into the nucleus. The physiological relevance of this process has been shown in proepicardial cells in which blockade of Rho kinase prevents their differentiation to coronary SMCs.13 Recently, a role for voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) in the expression of SMC differentiation genes in rat SMCs has been suggested. In KCl-treated cells, blockade of VGCCs by nifedipine attenuated SMA expression.14 Moreover, S1P-induced membrane translocation of RhoA was decreased by pretreatment of SMCs with nifedipine.6

The present study tests the hypothesis that S1P2R regulates expression of SMC differentiation genes after arterial injury and investigates the potential signaling pathways involved.

Methods

Materials

S1P was purchased from Cayman and thrombin from American Diagnostica Inc. Antibodies were from Abcam (SM22α, β-actin), Cell Signaling (β-tubulin), Santa Cruz (SRF, Pol II, rabbit IgG), and Sigma (SMA, mouse IgG-1κ). The ECL-kit, horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-coupled antimouse antibody, and HRP-coupled protein A, and protein A sepharose beads were from GE Healthcare. C3 exotoxin was from Cytoskeleton, BAPTA-AM and thapsigargin from Calbiochem, and nifedipine from Sigma. Custom primers and probes were purchased from Invitrogen or Integrated DNA Technologies. All primer and probe sequences are shown in supplemental Table I (available online at http://atvb.ahajournals.org).

Animals, Surgical Procedures, and Isolation of Carotid SMCs

S1P2R-null mice and wild-type mice were kindly provided by Dr Richard L. Proia (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md).15 Heterozygous mice were bred to generate S1P2R-null and wild-type littermates. Genotypes were verified by polymerase chain reaction analysis using specific primers.15 The left common carotid artery of male mice (8 to 10 weeks old) was dissected and ligated near the carotid bifurcation as previously described.16 At the indicated time points, carotid arteries were excised and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen or transferred to RNALater (Ambion). Carotid SMCs were isolated as previously described17 and maintained in DMEM supplemented with antibiotics (200 U/mL penicillin, 0.2 mg/mL streptomycin, all from GIBCO) and 10% fetal bovine serum (Atlantic Biologics).

Analysis of Gene Expression by Real-Time PCR and Western Blot Analysis

Standard protocols were used to analyze gene expression by real-time PCR and Western blot analysis using preparations of total RNA and protein, respectively. Please see the supplemental materials for detailed methods, including primer sequences (supplemental Table I).

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Assay

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays were performed with minor adjustments as recently described.18 Please see the supplemental materials for detailed methods including primer sequences (supplemental Table II).

RhoA Assay

Rho activity was measured using a commercially available kit as to the manufacturer’s instructions (Cytoskeleton).

Calcium Measurement

Serum-starved SMCs were loaded with 3 μmol/L Fluo4 calcium indicator dye (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen) for 30 minutes and rinsed with Tyrode solution. SMCs were stimulated with S1P (1 μmol/L) or KCl (60 mmol/L), and changes in fluorescence were imaged once every second for 150 seconds using confocal microscopy (LSM-510, Carl Zeiss; excitation: 488 nm; emission: 505 to 570 nm). The pixel intensities were quantified using NIH ImageJ software.

Statistics

As indicated in figure legends, data are presented as mean±SD or SEM. Significance of differences between 2 groups was calculated using Student t test, and Bonferroni adjustments were used for multiple variant analyses. Multiple isolations of SMCs were used in all in vitro experiments.

Results

S1P2R Regulates Expression of SMA After Arterial Injury

We recently reported that S1P2R-deficient arteries respond to injury with the formation of a large neointima, whereas wild-type arteries do not.8 In agreement with this observation, we observed increased medial proliferation in injured S1P2R-null arteries compared to wild-type arteries.8 To test the possibility that S1P2R regulates expression of SMC differentiation genes thereby controlling injury-induced phenotypic modulation, we measured mRNA of SMA, SM22α, calponin-1 (CNN1), and smooth muscle-myosin heavy chain (SM-MHC) in carotid arteries of S1P2R-null and wild-type mice at day 0, 2, 4, and 7 after injury. Expression of each gene tested decreased with injury (Figure 1A). At day 7, however, only SMA was significantly lower expressed in S1P2R-null arteries compared to wild-type arteries (Figure 1A). Neither myocardin, S1P1R, nor S1P3R were differentially expressed between wild-type and S1P2R-null arteries after injury (Figure 1A and 1B), and therefore none of these genes is likely to mediate S1P2R-dependent SMA expression after injury. To confirm RNA expression data, we measured SMA and SM22α protein as well. Whereas SMA is present at similar levels in uninjured wild-type and S1P2R-null arteries, its expression at day 7 and 14 after injury decreased significantly in S1P2R-null arteries only (by 30%, at day 7; supplemental Figure I). Such differences were not observed for SM22α (supplemental Figure I).

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 1. S1P2R induces expression of SMA after arterial injury but does not affect expression of myocardin, other SMC differentiation genes, or S1P receptors. S1P2R-null and wild-type mice underwent ligation injury of the left carotid artery. Arteries were harvested at the time points indicated. Total RNA was extracted, reverse transcribed, and analyzed by qPCR for expression of calponin-1 (CNN1), SM22α, smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SM-MHC), smooth muscle α-actin (SMA), myocardin (MYCD) (A), S1P1R, S1P2R and S1P3R (B). Data (mean±SD, n=3) are expressed as fold induction over expression in wild-type at day 0.

S1P2R Regulates Expression of SMA in Response to S1P

In vitro, S1P has previously been shown to stimulate SMA expression in SMCs, and a role for S1P2R and possibly S1P3R in this process has been suggested.9 Using wild-type and S1P2R-null SMCs in vitro, we found that expression of SMA, SM22α, CNN1, and SM-MHC, but not myocardin, is induced by S1P (Figure 2A). A significant difference between wild-type and S1P2R-null SMCs, however, was observed with SMA and SM22α only, both of which were more strongly induced in wild-type SMCs (Figure 2A). The same difference, although less pronounced, was observed for SMA and SM22α protein (Figure 2B). As SMA expression is regulated by SRF, we performed ChIP assays to investigate whether SRF enrichment at the promoter or the enhancer region in the first intron of the SMA gene are regulated by S1P2R. In wild-type SMCs, S1P increased enrichment of SRF at both sites by approximately 5-fold (Figure 3A). In S1P2R-null SMCs, enrichment of SRF before or after S1P stimulation was significantly less (Figure 3A). To demonstrate that S1P also stimulates transcription of the SMA gene, we determined binding of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) to the promoter and enhancer region. Binding of Pol II to either region was stimulated by S1P in both cell types but markedly decreased in S1P2R-null SMCs compared to wild-type SMCs (Figure 3B).

Figure2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 2. SMA expression by S1P depends on S1P2R. Quiescent SMCs were stimulated with 1 μmol/L S1P. A, At 3 hours after stimulation, mRNA expression of CNN1, SMA, SM22α, SM-MHC, and MYOCD was measured by qPCR. Data (mean±SD, n=4 to 5) are expressed as fold induction by S1P for wild-type and S1P2R-null SMCs, respectively. *P<0.05. B, At 24 hours after stimulation, total cell lysates were prepared and equal amounts (1 μg/lane) subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by Western blotting. Blots were probed with antibody against SMA, SM22α, and β-tubulin. Typical blots are shown for 2 independent isolates (a and b) for each cell type.

Figure3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 3. S1P regulates enrichment of SRF and RNA polymerase II at the SMA gene in a S1P2R-dependent manner. At 15 minutes after stimulation, chromatin was prepared and analyzed for binding of serum response factor (SRF; A) and RNA polymerase II (Pol II; B) to CArG domains in the promoter and enhancer of SMA, as well as to a region approximately 6 Kb downstream of the start codon (control). Data (mean±SEM) are presented as percent of input; n=6 for wild-type (SRF, Pol II), n=5 for S1P2R-null (SRF, Pol II), and n=3 for all nonspecific antibody controls (rabbit IgG for SRF and mouse IgG-1κ for Pol II).

S1P-Induced SMA Expression Requires Rho Activation and Calcium Release From Intracellular Stores

It is known that S1P activates Rho and causes an increase in intracellular calcium.19–22 We tested a role for Rho and calcium in S1P2R-dependent SMA expression by using various inhibitors. Treatment of wild-type SMCs with C3 exotoxin (a Rho inhibitor23), BAPTA-AM (calcium chelator), or thapsigargin (an inhibitor of the sarco-endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+/ATPase, SERCA) all prevented the S1P-dependent induction of SMA message and protein expression (Figure 4). In contrast, blockade of L-type VGCCs with nifedipine had no effect on SMA expression by S1P.

Figure4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 4. SMA expression by S1P depends on Rho and release from intracellular stores. Quiescent wild-type SMCs were treated with C3 exotoxin (C3, 24 hours, 2 μg/mL), BAPTA-AM (BA, 30 minutes, 10 μmol/L), nifedipine (Nif, 30 minutes, 1 μmol/L), or thapsigargin (TP, 3 μmol/L, 8 hours) before stimulation with S1P (1 μmol/L). At 3 hours after stimulation, SMA expression was measured by qPCR. Data (mean±SD, n=3) in the presence of inhibitor are expressed as percent control (vehicle). *P<0.05 (drug-treated vs control; Bonferroni adjustment was applied). Inset, At 24 hours after stimulation, protein extracts were prepared and equal amounts of extract (1 μg/lane) subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by Western blotting. Blots were probed with SMA antibody. A typical blot is shown.

We next determined the contribution of S1P2R to activation of Rho and release of calcium by S1P. Based on the literature, S1P2R is the dominant S1P receptor to activate Rho but S1P3R might also contribute.19–22,24 In contrast, S1P3R is generally considered the primary S1P receptor responsible for the increase of intracellular calcium in response to S1P.24 In comparison to wild-type SMCs, activation of RhoA by S1P in S1P2R-null SMCs is insignificant (Figure 5A). As L-type VGCC-mediated calcium influx has recently been suggested to contribute to RhoA activation,6 we tested whether a calcium-dependent event is upstream of S1P-mediated activation of RhoA. This is not the case as chelating calcium does not affect activation of RhoA by S1P (Figure 5B). Further, blockade of either SERCA by thapsigargin or L-type VGCCs by nifedipine had no effect on RhoA activity following S1P stimulation (Figure 5B).

Figure5
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 5. Activation of RhoA by S1P depends on S1P2R. Quiescent SMCs (wild-type and S1P2R-null) were stimulated with 1 μmol/L S1P for 5 minutes before RhoA activity was measured. Data are expressed as fold stimulation over quiescent wild-type. A, Data are presented as mean±SD, n=3, 3 independent isolates were used for each cell type. *P<0.05. B, Where indicated, wild-type cells were treated with BAPTA-AM (BA), nifedipine (Nif), or thapsigargin (TP) as described for Figure 4 before stimulation with S1P. Data are presented as percent expression with 100% measured in the presence of vehicle (mean±SD, n=3).

To assess the contribution of S1P2R to the increase in intracellular calcium induced by S1P, we measured calcium transients in wild-type and S1P2R-null SMCs. On average, S1P2R-null cells reached only 25% of the S1P-mediated calcium increase observed in wild-type cells (Figure 6A), whereas, as expected, wild-type and S1P2R-null SMCs responded similarly to thrombin (Figure 6A). The S1P-induced calcium transients were abolished by BAPTA-AM and thapsigargin but not affected by nifedipine (Figure 6B), which is consistent with our observation that thapsigargin but not nifedipine inhibits S1P-induced expression of SMA (Figure 4). The effects of these drugs on KCl-stimulated calcium transients in SMCs have been investigated in control experiments, which confirmed the efficacy of nifedipine (supplemental Figure II). Further, we found that C3 exotoxin reduced the S1P-stimulated calcium release by approximately 60% suggesting that Rho regulates, at least in part, calcium transients induced by S1P (Figure 6B).

Figure6
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 6. S1P releases calcium from intracellular stores in a S1P2R-dependent manner. Calcium transients were measured in quiescent wild-type and S1P2R-null SMCs after stimulation with 1 μmol/L S1P or 10 ng/mL thrombin and quantified by measuring peak height after setting the baseline to 1. Data are presented as mean±SD, n=10 to 12, *P<0.05. A, Quiescent wild-type cells were pretreated with BAPTA-AM (BA), nifedipine (Nif), thapsigargin (TP), or C3 as described for Figure 4 before S1P stimulation. Data are presented as mean±SD, n=4 to 8, *P<0.05 (drug-treated vs control, Bonferroni adjustment was applied).

Discussion

We previously demonstrated that S1P2R-null carotid arteries respond to ligation injury with the formation of large neointimal lesions, whereas their wild-type littermates do not, suggesting that S1P2R inhibits neointimal growth.8 S1P2R blocks SMC migration by inhibiting activation of Rac.25,26 Although this mechanism is likely to contribute to the inhibitory effect of S1P2R on neointimal formation, it does not explain our finding that medial proliferation is much higher in injured S1P2R-null carotid arteries compared to wild-type arteries.8 An inhibitory effect of S1P2R on SMC proliferation in vitro has recently been demonstrated using the S1P2R antagonist, JTE-013.6 Given the previous observations in vitro that S1P induces expression of SMC differentiation genes via a Rho-dependent pathway9,10 and that S1P2R is the major contributor to Rho activation in response to S1P,19–22 we tested the hypothesis that S1P2R regulates expression of SMC differentiation genes after arterial injury. We measured mRNA expression of CNN1, SM22α, SM-MHC, and SMA after carotid injury in wild-type and S1P2R-null mice and found that at 2 days after injury, expression of all genes was decreased by approximately 50% in both animals. The only difference between wild-type and S1P2R-null animals was that re–expression of SMA at day 7 after injury only occurred in wild-type arteries (Figure 1A and supplemental Figure I). This was unexpected given our assumption that all SMC differentiation genes tested are similarly regulated by SRF and its cofactors of the myocardin/MRTF family. In vitro, S1P induces expression of SMA, SM22α, CNN1, and SM-MHC to different levels, and S1P2R seems to only promote the expression of SMA and SM22α (Figure 2). Clearly, these genes are regulated by multiple pathways that are differentially activated by S1P. We do not know why SM22α is strongly induced by S1P/S1P2R in vitro, but its expression does not differ between injured wild-type and S1P2R-null arteries (compare Figure 1A with Figure 2). It is possible that differences emerge later after injury.

Using ChIP assays, we demonstrate that S1P2R regulates SRF binding to the regulatory CArG domains in the SMA promoter and enhancer region (Figure 3A). A similar observation was made for Pol II which is consistent with the conclusion that S1P2R regulates SMA transcription. We do not believe that this process is regulated by changes in myocardin expression because there is no difference in myocardin mRNA levels between wild-type and S1P2R-null arteries at any time point after injury (0 to 7 days), and especially at day 7, when expression of SMA is significantly higher in wild-type arteries (Figure 1A). As has been previously suggested by in vitro experiments, a possible mechanism for S1P2R-dependent regulation of SMA expression is the Rho-dependent translocation of the SRF cofactors MRTF-A/B from the cytosol into the nucleus.9 Whether this mechanism also regulates SMA expression by S1P2R after injury in vivo remains to be investigated.

Given a recent report in balloon-injured rat carotid arteries demonstrating that injury regulates expression of S1PRs,6 we investigated whether differences in S1P1R and S1P3R expression in wild-type and S1P2R-null mice could account for the observation that S1P2R-null arteries but not wild-type arteries form intimal lesions after injury. In contrast to the rat model, we did not observe significant changes of S1PR expression after injury (Figure 1B). At most, there is a trend that expression of S1P3R is slightly induced after injury, but this was observed in wild-type as well as in S1P2R-null arteries (Figure 1B). It is possible that differences between the rat and mouse model regarding expression of S1PRs after injury is attributable to the endothelium which is removed in the rat model but present in the mouse model. Taken together, our current hypothesis is that S1P2R regulates the reexpression of SMA after injury, thereby limiting the potential of the injured artery to form an intima, but we cannot rule out other mechanisms.

To elucidate S1P2R-dependent signaling pathways that regulate SMA expression, we compared the responses of wild-type and S1P2R-null SMCs to S1P. We confirmed previous suggestions that S1P2R activates RhoA, and that RhoA is critical for SMA expression by S1P9 (Figures 4 and 5⇑). In addition, we determined that release of calcium from intracellular stores is also required for S1P-mediated expression of SMA (Figure 4). Calcium transients after S1P stimulation have been previously reported and depending on cell type, different S1P receptors appear to be involved. Early studies using mouse embryonic fibroblasts lacking S1P2R, S1P3R, or both suggested that calcium increase induced by S1P is IP3-dependent and that S1P3R, but not S1P2R, is involved.24 In contrast, overexpression of individual S1P receptors in HeLa cells demonstrated the ability of S1P2R and S1P3R (but not S1P1R) to increase intracellular calcium after S1P stimulation.27 Our data in SMCs indicate S1P2R is the primary receptor responsible for S1P-induced increase of cytosolic calcium (Figure 6A). Consistent with their effects on SMA expression (Figure 4), thapsigargin but not nifedipine blocked the increase of intracellular calcium by S1P (Figure 6B). Moreover, blockade of Rho by C3 exotoxin was partially inhibitory suggesting that Rho regulates release of calcium from intracellular stores by S1P (Figure 6B). In endothelial cells, Rho has been shown to mediate an association of the IP3 receptor with the transient receptor potential channel (TRPC1) thereby stimulating calcium entry after store depletion.28 Whether such a mechanism exists in SMCs remains to be investigated.

To date, a calcium dependency for SMA expression has only been reported in KCl-treated SMCs.14 This study concluded that KCl-induced cell depolarization and the subsequent influx of calcium through L-type VGCCs regulates activation of RhoA.14 A similar mechanism has recently been proposed for S1P-induced activation of RhoA, based on the observation that nifedipine blocks both translocation of RhoA to the membrane and SRF enrichment at the SMA CArG domains in response to S1P.6 This further implies that nifedipine also blocks S1P-induced SMA expression, although these data were not presented. We tested the possibility that S1P might regulate SMA expression via L-type VGCCs operating upstream of RhoA by measuring S1P-induced RhoA activation and SMA expression in the absence and the presence of BAPTA-AM or nifedipine. Somewhat surprisingly, we found that nifedipine had no effect on RhoA activation or SMA expression (Figures 4 and 5⇑), and we therefore conclude that L-type VGCCs are not required for S1P-induced SMA expression in mouse SMCs. Given this observation, we investigated whether calcium release from intracellular stores is stimulated by S1P and contributes to SMA expression. The SERCA-inhibitor thapsigargin blocked S1P-mediated SMA expression (Figure 4) as well as the increase of intracellular calcium (Figure 6D), but not the activation of RhoA by S1P (Figure 5B). This apparent discrepancy in S1P using different calcium stores to express SMA may be attributable to cell-type-specific properties as the above mentioned study6 was performed in rat aortic SMCs, whereas we used mouse carotid SMCs.

The mechanism by which calcium regulates SMA expression in SMCs is unknown. SRF is phosphorylated by calcium-dependent calmodulin kinase (CaMK) at multiple sites,29 which may directly regulate its activity.30 In cardiac myocytes, calcium/CaMK inhibits the association between SRF and a histone deacetylase thereby derepressing SRF activity.31 Epigenetic regulation of the SMA promoter has been shown,32,33 and it is an attractive possibility that calcium regulates SRF activity by the recruitment of histone modifying enzymes.

In summary, we provide evidence that S1P/S1P2R regulates SMA expression in arteries after injury. In vitro, the extent of induction of other SRF-dependent SMC differentiation genes by S1P greatly varies, and in vivo, SMA is the only SMC differentiation gene we found regulated by S1P2R. Although more work is necessary to define the role for S1P2R in the injury response, we believe that induction of SMA, and potentially additional SMC differentiation genes, contributes to the inhibition of neointimal growth by S1P2R. We further demonstrate that S1P-mediated induction of SMA expression in vitro requires S1P2R-dependent activation of RhoA and release of calcium from intracellular stores.

Acknowledgments

We thank Richard Proia for the generous gift of S1P2R-null mice, Aesim Cho for mouse colony maintenance, L. Fernando Santana and Michael LaFlamme for their help with calcium measurements, Ron Seifert for his help with confocal microscopy, as well as Joel Nelson and Karol Bomsztyk for their expert advice concerning the FastChIP method.

Sources of Funding

This work was supported by NIH grants HL052459, HL070850, and HL088374. A.D.G. is a recipient of an AHA predoctoral fellowship.

Disclosures

None.

Footnotes

  • Received May 22, 2009; revision accepted July 2, 2009.

References

  1. ↵
    Owens GK, Kumar MS, Wamhoff BR. Molecular regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation in development and disease. Physiol Rev. 2004; 84: 767–801.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Hao H, Gabbiani G, Bochaton-Piallat ML. Arterial smooth muscle cell heterogeneity: implications for atherosclerosis and restenosis development. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23: 1510–1520.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Cyster JG. Chemokines, sphingosine-1-phosphate, and Cell migration in secondary lymphoid organs. Ann Rev Immunol. 2005; 23: 127–159.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Schwab SR, Cyster JG. Finding a way out: lymphocyte egress from lymphoid organs. Nat Immunol. 2007; 8: 1295–1301.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Liu Y, Wada R, Yamashita T, Mi Y, Deng CX, Hobson JP, Rosenfeldt HM, Nava VE, Chae SS, Lee MJ, Liu CH, Hla T, Spiegel S, Proia RL. Edg-1, the G protein-coupled receptor for sphingosine-1-phosphate, is essential for vascular maturation. J Clin Invest. 2000; 106: 951–961.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Wamhoff BR, Lynch KR, Macdonald TL, Owens GK. Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor subtypes differentially regulate smooth muscle cell phenotype. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008; 28: 1454–1461.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Deutschman DH, Carstens JS, Klepper RL, Smith WS, Page MT, Young TR, Gleason LA, Nakajima N, Sabbadini RA. Predicting obstructive coronary artery disease with serum sphingosine-1-phosphate. Am Heart J. 2003; 146: 62–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Shimizu T, Nakazawa T, Cho A, Dastvan F, Shilling D, Daum G, Reidy MA. Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 2 negatively regulates neointimal formation in mouse arteries. Circ Res. 2007; 101: 995–1000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Lockman K, Hinson JS, Medlin MD, Morris D, Taylor JM, Mack CP. Sphingosine 1-phosphate stimulates smooth muscle cell differentiation and proliferation by activating separate serum response factor co-factors. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279: 42422–42430.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Urata Y, Nishimura Y, Hirase T, Yokoyama M. Sphingosine 1-phosphate induces alpha-smooth muscle actin expression in lung fibroblasts via Rho-kinase. Kobe J Med Sci. 2005; 51: 17–27.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    Wang DZ, Olson EN. Control of smooth muscle development by the myocardin family of transcriptional coactivators. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2004; 14: 558–566.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Cen B, Selvaraj A, Prywes R. Myocardin/MKL family of SRF coactivators: key regulators of immediate early and muscle specific gene expression. J Cell Biochem. 2004; 93: 74–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Lu J, Landerholm TE, Wei JS, Dong XR, Wu SP, Liu X, Nagata K, Inagaki M, Majesky MW. Coronary smooth muscle differentiation from proepicardial cells requires rhoA-mediated actin reorganization and p160 rho-kinase activity. Dev Biol. 2001; 240: 404–418.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Wamhoff BR, Bowles DK, McDonald OG, Sinha S, Somlyo AP, Somlyo AV, Owens GK. L-type voltage-gated Ca2+ channels modulate expression of smooth muscle differentiation marker genes via a Rho kinase/myocardin/SRF-dependent mechanism. Circ Res. 2004; 95: 406–414.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Kono M, Mi Y, Liu Y, Sasaki T, Allende ML, Wu YP, Yamashita T, Proia RL. The sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors S1P1, S1P2, and S1P3 function coordinately during embryonic angiogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279: 29367–29373.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Kumar A, Lindner V. Remodeling with neointima formation in the mouse carotid artery after cessation of blood flow. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997; 17: 2238–2244.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Cho A, Reidy MA. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 is necessary for the regulation of smooth muscle cell replication and migration after arterial injury. Circ Res. 2002; 91: 845–851.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Nelson JD, Denisenko O, Sova P, Bomsztyk K. Fast chromatin immunoprecipitation assay. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 34: e2.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Ishii I, Fukushima N, Ye X, Chun J. Lysophospholipid receptors: signaling and biology. Annu Rev Biochem. 2004; 73: 321–354.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Kluk MJ, Hla T. Signaling of sphingosine-1-phosphate via the S1P/EDG-family of G-protein-coupled receptors. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002; 1582: 72–80.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    Takuwa Y. Subtype-specific differential regulation of Rho family G proteins and cell migration by the Edg family sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002; 1582: 112–120.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    Watterson KR, Ratz PH, Spiegel S. The role of sphingosine-1-phosphate in smooth muscle contraction. Cell Signal. 2005; 17: 289–298.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Boquet P. Bacterial toxins inhibiting or activating small GTP-binding proteins. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999; 886: 83–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Ishii I, Ye X, Friedman B, Kawamura S, Contos JJ, Kingsbury MA, Yang AH, Zhang G, Brown JH, Chun J. Marked perinatal lethality and cellular signaling deficits in mice null for the two sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptors, S1P(2)/LP(B2)/EDG-5 and S1P(3)/LP(B3)/EDG-3. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277: 25152–25159.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Okamoto H, Takuwa N, Yokomizo T, Sugimoto N, Sakurada S, Shigematsu H, Takuwa Y. Inhibitory regulation of Rac activation, membrane ruffling, and cell migration by the G protein-coupled sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor EDG5 but not EDG1 or EDG3. Mol Cell Biol. 2000; 20: 9247–9261.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Ryu Y, Takuwa N, Sugimoto N, Sakurada S, Usui S, Okamoto H, Matsui O, Takuwa Y. Sphingosine-1-phosphate, a platelet-derived lysophospholipid mediator, negatively regulates cellular Rac activity and cell migration in vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res. 2002; 90: 325–332.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Rapizzi E, Donati C, Cencetti F, Pinton P, Rizzuto R, Bruni P. Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors modulate intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis. Biochem Biophys Res Comm. 2007; 353: 268–274.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Mehta D, Ahmmed GU, Paria BC, Holinstat M, Voyno-Yasenetskaya T, Tiruppathi C, Minshall RD, Malik AB. RhoA interaction with inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor and transient receptor potential channel-1 regulates Ca2+ ENTRY: role in signaling increased endothelial permeability. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278: 33492–33500.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Flück M, Booth FW, Waxham MN. Skeletal muscle CaMKII enriches in nuclei and phosphorylates myogenic factor SRF at multiple sites. Biochem Biophys Res Comm. 2000; 270: 488–494.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Miranti CK, Ginty DD, Huang G, Chatila T, Greenberg ME. Calcium activates serum response factor-dependent transcription by a Ras- and Elk-1-independent mechanism that involves a Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase. Mol Cell Biol. 1995; 15: 3672–3684.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Davis FJ, Gupta M, Camoretti-Mercado B, Schwartz RJ, Gupta MP. Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase activates serum response factor transcription activity by its dissociation from histone deacetylase, HDAC4. Implications in cardiac muscle gene regulation during hypertrophy. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278: 20047–20058.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Cao D, Wang Z, Zhang CL, Oh J, Xing W, Li S, Richardson JA, Wang DZ, Olson EN. Modulation of smooth muscle gene expression by association of histone acetyltransferases and deacetylases with myocardin. Mol Cell Biol. 2005; 25: 364–376.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    McDonald OG, Wamhoff BR, Hoofnagle MH, Owens GK. Control of SRF binding to CArG box chromatin regulates smooth muscle gene expression in vivo. J Clin Invest. 2006; 116: 36–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
October 2009, Volume 29, Issue 10
  • Table of Contents
Previous ArticleNext Article

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Supplemental Materials
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Article Tools

  • Print
  • Citation Tools
    Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor-2 Regulates Expression of Smooth Muscle Alpha-Actin After Arterial Injury
    Allison D. Grabski, Takuya Shimizu, Jessie Deou, William M. Mahoney, Michael A. Reidy and Guenter Daum
    Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2009;29:1644-1650, originally published September 16, 2009
    https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.191965

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
  •  Download Powerpoint
  • Article Alerts
    Log in to Email Alerts with your email address.
  • Save to my folders

Share this Article

  • Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor-2 Regulates Expression of Smooth Muscle Alpha-Actin After Arterial Injury
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology web site.
  • Share on Social Media
    Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor-2 Regulates Expression of Smooth Muscle Alpha-Actin After Arterial Injury
    Allison D. Grabski, Takuya Shimizu, Jessie Deou, William M. Mahoney, Michael A. Reidy and Guenter Daum
    Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2009;29:1644-1650, originally published September 16, 2009
    https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.191965
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Related Articles

Cited By...

Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology

  • About ATVB
  • AHA CME
  • Meeting Abstracts
  • Permissions
  • Email Alerts
  • Open Access Information
  • AHA Journals RSS
  • AHA Newsroom

Contact the Editorial Office:
email: atvb@atvb.org

Information for:
  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Subscriber Help
  • Institutions / Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions FAQ
  • International Users
American Heart Association Learn and Live
National Center
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231

Customer Service

  • 1-800-AHA-USA-1
  • 1-800-242-8721
  • Local Info
  • Contact Us

About Us

Our mission is to build healthier lives, free of cardiovascular diseases and stroke. That single purpose drives all we do. The need for our work is beyond question. Find Out More about the American Heart Association

  • Careers
  • SHOP
  • Latest Heart and Stroke News
  • AHA/ASA Media Newsroom

Our Sites

  • American Heart Association
  • American Stroke Association
  • For Professionals
  • More Sites

Take Action

  • Advocate
  • Donate
  • Planned Giving
  • Volunteer

Online Communities

  • AFib Support
  • Garden Community
  • Patient Support Network
  • Professional Online Network

Follow Us:

  • Follow Circulation on Twitter
  • Visit Circulation on Facebook
  • Follow Circulation on Google Plus
  • Follow Circulation on Instagram
  • Follow Circulation on Pinterest
  • Follow Circulation on YouTube
  • Rss Feeds
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Ethics Policy
  • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Linking Policy
  • Diversity
  • Careers

©2018 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. The American Heart Association is a qualified 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization.
*Red Dress™ DHHS, Go Red™ AHA; National Wear Red Day ® is a registered trademark.

  • PUTTING PATIENTS FIRST National Health Council Standards of Excellence Certification Program
  • BBB Accredited Charity
  • Comodo Secured