Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2008;28:e25
doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.159525
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huang, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Vita, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Huang, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Vita, J. A.
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2008;28:e25.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Letters to the Editor

Reactive Hyperemia Revisited

Alex L. Huang; Joseph A. Vita

Evans Department of Medicine and Whitaker, Cardiovascular Institute, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass


An extract of the first 100% of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

In response:

We thank Calderaro et al for their interest in our work. They provide interesting data from their unpublished study that examined the relation between measures of vascular function and adverse events in a cohort of 96 patients undergoing vascular surgery. Similar to our findings, they report that reactive hyperemia is lower in patients with postoperative events compared to patients without an event. In contrast to our study, however, they observed no significant difference in brachial artery flow-mediated dilation between groups. This apparently discrepant result could result from a variety of factors, including differences in the patient population and the methodology used to assess vascular function. In addition, we respectfully point out that our sample size (267 patients) and number of events (50) was substantially larger, and we therefore had more statistical power to detect a difference in flow-mediated dilation between groups. We strongly concur with the authors that reactive hyperemia is an important and previously under-recognized aspect of vascular function that may be relevant to the pathogenesis of cardiovascular events. Measures of reactive hyperemia may have potential as method to assess cardiovascular risk.

Disclosures

None.