This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tuomainen, A.M. Articles by Pussinen, P.J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Tuomainen, A.M. Articles by Pussinen, P.J.

(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2008;28:e17.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.

Letters to the Editor

Matrix Metalloproteinase-8 and Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-1 in Serum Do Not Reflect the Analytes Circulating in Blood

A.M. Tuomainen

Institute of Dentistry, University of Helsinki, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland

K. Nyyssönen

Research Institute of Public Health, University of Kuopio, Finland

T. Tervahartiala; T. Sorsa; P.J. Pussinen

Institute of Dentistry, University of Helsinki, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland

Key Words: matrix metalloproteinase-8 • time-resolved immunofluorometric assay • enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay • serum • plasma

An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.

In response:

We appreciate the interest of Professor Jung¹ in our article. He raises an important issue concerning the methods of collecting blood samples for assay determinations and points out the differences between serum and plasma matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-8 measurements. The serum samples used in our study were collected in vacuum glass tubes (Venoject VT-100 Terumo Corp) as previously described in detail.² Clotting in glass tubes is faster and more effective than in plastic tubes, and thus no clot activator was used. Unfortunately, no plasma samples were available for our studies.³

We are aware of the differences of the MMP-8 concentrations between serum and plasma samples. The Figure shows the MMP-8 concentrations of 15 serum and plasma samples from patients with chronic adult periodontitis.⁴ For determinations we use both time-resolved immunofluorometric assay, IFMA (Medix Biochemica) with monoclonal catching and tracer antibodies as in the original article, and ELISA (GE Healthcare, Amersham MMP-8 Human Biotrak ELISA System). As shown in the Figure, both methods gave significantly higher serum MMP-8 values compared with plasma samples from the same patients. The differences between serum IFMA and ELISA results may be explained by the high sensitivity of IFMA, and by the obviously different specificities of the antibodies used in the assays. The differences were most notable with high serum MMP-8 concentrations as measured by IFMA (>20 ng/mL), whereas smaller concentrations gave similar results with both procedures (data not shown). Most importantly, there were significant positive correlations between serum and plasma IFMA . . . [Full Text of this Article]