This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 24/6/1087    most recent 01.ATV.0000128124.72935.0fv1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Olchawa, B. Articles by Sviridov, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Olchawa, B. Articles by Sviridov, D. Related Collections Lipid and lipoprotein metabolism Risk Factors

(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2004;24:1087.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.

Atherosclerosis and Lipoproteins

Physical Fitness and Reverse Cholesterol Transport

Beata Olchawa; Bronwyn A. Kingwell; Anh Hoang; Laurence Schneider; Osamu Miyazaki; Paul Nestel; Dmitri Sviridov

From Baker Heart Research Institute (Wynn Domain) (B.O., B.A.K., A.H., L.S., P.N., D.S.), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; and Daiichi Pure Chemicals (O.M.), Tokyo, Japan.

Correspondence to Dr Dmitri Sviridov, Baker Heart Research Institute, Commercial Rd, PO Box 6492 St. Kilda Rd. Central, Melbourne, Victoria, 8008, Australia. E-mail Dmitri.Sviridov{at}Baker.edu.au

Background— Physical exercise is associated with a decreased risk of cardiovascular disease, which may be partly caused by the effect of exercise on the lipoprotein profile. The most consistent effect of exercise on lipoprotein metabolism is an increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL).

Methods and Results— Parameters of reverse cholesterol transport (RCT) in 25 endurance-trained male athletes were compared with 33 age-matched males enjoying an active lifestyle. VO₂max was higher in athletes than in controls (53.4±1.2 versus 38.8±1.0 mL/min per kg; P<0.01). The following differences in parameters of RCT were found: (1) plasma HDL cholesterol and apoA-I levels were higher in athletes compared with controls (1.7±0.1 versus 1.4±0.1 mmol/L; P<0.001; and 145±2 versus 128±3 mg/dL; P<0.001, respectively). Both correlated with VO₂max up to the value of 51 mL/min per kg; (2) preß₁-HDL was higher in athletes than in controls (54±4 versus 37±3 µg/mL; P<0.001) and correlated positively with VO₂max; (3) lecithin cholesterol: acyltransferase activity was higher in athletes (29.8±1.2 versus 24.2±1.4 nmol/µL per hour; P<0.005); and (4) the capacity of plasma to promote cholesterol efflux from macrophages was higher in athletes (18.8%±0.8% versus 16.2%±0.3%; P<0.03).

Conclusions— The likely reason for higher HDL concentration in physically fit people is increased formation of HDL from apoA-I and cellular lipids.

Parameters of reverse cholesterol transport in athletes were compared with controls. Plasma concentrations of high-density lipoprotein (HDL), apolipoprotein A-I, preß₁-HDL, lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase and capacity of plasma to promote cholesterol efflux were higher in athletes. We conclude that the likely reason for higher HDL concentration in physically fit people is increased formation of HDL.

Key Words: atherosclerosis • lipoproteins • exercise • cholesterol

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. M. M. Ooi, G. F. Watts, P. J. Nestel, D. Sviridov, A. Hoang, and P. H. R. Barrett Dose-Dependent Regulation of High-Density Lipoprotein Metabolism with Rosuvastatin in the Metabolic Syndrome J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2008; 93(2): 430 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]