Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2004;24:e197
doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000148203.03346.b5
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wakatsuki, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sakuma, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wakatsuki, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sakuma, I.
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2004;24:e197.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Letters to the Editor

Lower Doses of Estrogen Replacement Therapy and the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease

Akihiko Wakatsuki

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,, Kochi Medical School, Kochi, Japan


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

To the Editor:

In their interesting study, Koh et al demonstrated that lower dosage of oral conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) eliminated the adverse effects of conventional dosage of CEE on markers of vascular inflammation and coagulation, in addition to preserving the favorable effects of estrogen on endothelial function.1 Similar to their report, our previous findings demonstrated that CEE at a dosage of 0.625 mg increased inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein, serum amyloid protein A, and interleukin-6, whereas CEE at a dosage of 0.3125 mg did not elevate these markers. Additionally, low-dose CEE has an effect comparable to high-dose CEE on endothelium,2 and low-dose CEE has benefits of plasma triglyceride and the size of low-density lipoprotein (LDL). High-dose CEE increases plasma concentrations of triglyceride, and this estrogen-induced increase in plasma triglyceride reduces the size of LDL particles that are more susceptible to oxidation. In contrast, plasma triglyceride concentrations and the size of LDL particles are unaffected and the oxidative susceptibility of LDL is inhibited by low-dose CEE administration.3

The Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study and the Women’s Health Initiative reported that hormone therapy increased the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) in postmenopausal women. In contrast, Grodstein et al demonstrated that CEE at a daily dosage of ≥0.625 mg increases the risk for stroke, whereas 0.3 mg of CEE daily is associated with a reduction in the risk for stroke.4 In addition, Ferrara et al also demonstrated that low dosage but not medium or high dosage estrogen decreased the risk . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Kwang Kon Koh; Eak Kyun Shin

Cardiology, Gil Heart Center, Gachon Medical School, Incheon, Korea

Ichiro Sakuma

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan