This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 23/12/2260    most recent 01.ATV.0000095976.40874.E0v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zhu, H. Articles by Friedman, M. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zhu, H. Articles by Friedman, M. H. Related Collections Risk Factors Coronary imaging: angiography/ultrasound/Doppler/CC Vasculitis Brain Arteries

(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2003;23:2260.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.

Atherosclerosis and Lipoproteins

Relationship Between the Dynamic Geometry and Wall Thickness of a Human Coronary Artery

Hui Zhu; Morton H. Friedman

From the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC.

Correspondence to Morton H. Friedman, Box 90281, Campus, Duke University, Durham NC 27708-0281. E-mail mhfriedm{at}duke.edu

Objective— It is widely recognized that hemodynamic and wall mechanical forces are involved in the initiation and development of atherosclerosis. In the coronary vasculature, these forces are likely mediated by arterial dynamics and geometry. This research examines the hypothesis that coronary artery motion and geometry affect the local predisposition to disease, presumably through their influence on the stresses at and in the artery wall.

Methods and Results— The dynamics of a human right coronary artery and the variation of wall thickness along its length were characterized from biplane cineangiograms and intravascular ultrasound records, respectively. The dynamic geometry parameters were distance along the vessel, cyclic displacement, axial strain, curvature, and torsion. Multiple regression analyses using principal components show that (1) no single dynamic geometry parameter has a dominant influence on wall thickness, (2) linear combinations of such parameters predict wall thickness measures with high confidence (P<0.001; R² between 0.17 and 0.44), and (3) both the time-average values of curvature and torsion and their excursion during the cardiac cycle are positively correlated with maximum wall thickness and cross-sectional asymmetry.

Conclusions— The relationships seen here support the hypothesis that dynamic geometry plays a role in the localization of early coronary artery thickening.

Key Words: coronary arteries • dynamic geometry • wall thickness • biplane angiography • intravascular ultrasound

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. K. Joshi, R. L. Leask, J. G. Myers, M. Ojha, J. Butany, and C. R. Ethier Intimal Thickness Is not Associated With Wall Shear Stress Patterns in the Human Right Coronary Artery Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., December 1, 2004; 24(12): 2408 - 2413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]