Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2000;20:e16-e25

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beumer, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sixma, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beumer, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sixma, J. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pathophysiology
Right arrow Platelets
Right arrow Other Vascular biology
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2000;20:e16.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


ATVB Electronic Pages

Fibronectin in an Extracellular Matrix of Cultured Endothelial Cells Supports Platelet Adhesion via Its Ninth Type III Repeat

A Comparison With Platelet Adhesion to Isolated Fibronectin

Sara Beumer; Glenda J. Heijnen-Snyder; Martin J. W. IJsseldijk; Philip G. de Groot; Jan J. Sixma

From University Hospital Utrecht, Department of Hematology, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Correspondence to Dr J.J. Sixma, University Hospital Utrecht, Department of Hematology (G03.647), Heidelberglaan 100/PO Box 85500, 3584 CX Utrecht/3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands. E-mail jsixma{at}laboratory.azu.nl

Abstract

Abstract—We investigated the involvement of different domains of fibronectin in mediating platelet adhesion to fibronectin in the extracellular matrix (ECM) of cultured endothelial cells under flow conditions. Polyclonal anti-fibronectin antibodies were absorbed with Sepharose to which no protein, intact fibronectin, or different fibronectin fragments had been coupled to obtain supernatants (Sups) (Sup0, SupFN, and Supname of the fragment, respectively) from which a specific part of the antibodies had been removed. Treatment of the ECM before perfusion with Sup0 resulted in a 36% decrease in platelet coverage, whereas treatment with SupFN resulted in maximal adhesion. Treatment of the ECM with supernatants from which antibodies directed against the gelatin- or heparin-binding domain had been removed showed the same inhibition as treatment with Sup0. Removal of antibodies directed to the 120-kDa cell-binding domain resulted in a level of adhesion equal to the level found when the ECM was treated with SupFN. Further analysis of this central region showed that only treatment with supernatants from which antibodies directed to the ninth type III repeat (III-9) of fibronectin had been removed resulted in a significantly higher adhesion than treatment with Sup0. Studies of adhesion to the fragments themselves showed that only fragments containing III-10 were able to support adhesion. Mutation of the Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) sequence into Arg-Gly-Glu (RGE) in one of those fragments resulted in a complete loss of adhesive capacity. These data suggest that platelet adhesion to fibronectin in the ECM depends on III-9, whereas III-10 does not seem to be required. For platelet adhesion to isolated fibronectin, an intact RGD sequence seems to be crucial.


Key Words: platelet adhesion • fibronectin • endothelial cell matrix