This Article Full Text Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Smedby, O. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Smedby, O.

(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1997;17:912-918.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.

Articles

Do Plaques Grow Upstream or Downstream?

An Angiographic Study in the Femoral Artery

Örjan Smedby

From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Uppsala University, Sweden.

Correspondence to Örjan Smedby, MD, PhD, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital, S-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden. E-mail orjan.smedby{at}radiol.uu.se

Abstract Although the distribution of atherosclerosis has been described, little is known about the direction of growth of plaques. In this study, 237 patients with slight or moderate atherosclerosis underwent femoral angiography twice at a 3-year interval, and the films were studied with computerized image analysis. First, atherosclerosis was measured as edge roughness, and the change in roughness of each 1-cm segment over the 3-year period was related to the edge roughness of the segments immediately upstream and downstream. On the medial side of the artery, the change in edge roughness was found to be more strongly related to the roughness values upstream than to those downstream of the segment studied. This suggests that growth in the downstream direction is more common than growth in the upstream direction. On the lateral side, more equivocal results were obtained. Atherosclerosis was also assessed by study of the cross-sectional area of the artery as a function of distance along the vessel. A mathematical model of plaque growth was formulated as a nonlinear filtering of this curve. Growth in the downstream direction was significantly (P<.001) more frequent than growth in the upstream direction. The findings are compatible with an atherogenic effect of fluid mechanical disturbances, such as flow separation, that may occur downstream of a stenosis.

Key Words: atherosclerosis • stenosis • progression • blood flow • flow separation

This article has been cited by other articles:

				U. Olgac, D. Poulikakos, S. C. Saur, H. Alkadhi, and V. Kurtcuoglu Patient-specific three-dimensional simulation of LDL accumulation in a human left coronary artery in its healthy and atherosclerotic states Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2009; 296(6): H1969 - H1982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. Olgac, V. Kurtcuoglu, and D. Poulikakos Computational modeling of coupled blood-wall mass transport of LDL: effects of local wall shear stress Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): H909 - H919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. R. Ward, G. Pasterkamp, A. C. Yeung, and C. Borst Arterial Remodeling : Mechanisms and Clinical Implications Circulation, September 5, 2000; 102(10): 1186 - 1191. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. T. Dirksen, A. C. van der Wal, F. M. van den Berg, C. M. van der Loos, and A. E. Becker Distribution of Inflammatory Cells in Atherosclerotic Plaques Relates to the Direction of Flow Circulation, November 10, 1998; 98(19): 2000 - 2003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]