This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fager, G. Articles by Wiklund, O. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fager, G. Articles by Wiklund, O.

(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1997;17:3527-3533.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.

Articles

Cholesterol Reduction and Clinical Benefit

Are There Limits to Our Expectations?

Gunnar Fager; ; Olov Wiklund

From the Wallenberg Laboratory for Cardiovascular Research, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden.

Correspondence to Gunnar Fager, MD, PhD, the Wallenberg Laboratory for Cardiovascular Research, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, S-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden. E-mail Gunnar.Fager{at}Wlab.Wall.gu.se

Abstract Encouraging intervention trials drive our expectations toward more aggressive cholesterol-lowering therapies, lower target levels, and less severe hypercholesterolemia. Available studies may predict which patients, degrees of total cholesterol (TC) reduction, and baseline and target levels of TC provide the most clinical benefit. Data were pooled from seven primary and nine secondary controlled trials with major coronary heart disease (CHD) events as primary endpoints. The analysis showed that we can expect large reductions in CHD from TC reduction in primary and secondary prevention. However, the reduction is much larger in subjects with high TC and/or previous CHD events. The percent reduction in CHD increased exponentially with increasing percent TC reductions, which predicted >70% of the change in CHD. Consequently, we cannot expect cost-effective clinical benefits from mean reductions in TC >15 (LDL cholesterol >20)%. The TC level at the study endpoint correlated with CHD incidence irrespective of the study group and explained almost 45% of CHD incidence. The relationship was progressive and leveled off at a TC level below about 150 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L) (LDL cholesterol 110 mg/dL [2.8 mmol/L]). Little extra clinical benefit can be expected from further reductions. We can expect an average 2% reduction in CHD events per percent reduction in TC. We can also expect a 2-fold greater clinical benefit among subjects with high initial TC levels than among those with low levels. Finally, we can expect that the cholesterol-attributable risk is reset to that predicted by the TC level achieved within 4 to 6 years.

Key Words: cholesterol • coronary heart disease • hypolipidemic drugs • hyperlipidemia • prevention

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Moy, A. A. B. Sallam, and M. Wong The results of a worksite health promotion programme in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Health Promot. Int., December 1, 2006; 21(4): 301 - 310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. N. Khot, M. B. Khot, C. T. Bajzer, S. K. Sapp, E. M. Ohman, S. J. Brener, S. G. Ellis, A. M. Lincoff, and E. J. Topol Prevalence of Conventional Risk Factors in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease JAMA, August 20, 2003; 290(7): 898 - 904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Di Napoli, A.A. Taccardi, M. Oliver, and R. De Caterina Statins and stroke: evidence for cholesterol-independent effects Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2002; 23(24): 1908 - 1921. [PDF]

				C. A. Aguilar-Salinas, G. Olaiz, V. Valles, J. M. R. Torres, F. J. G. Perez, J. A. Rull, R. Rojas, A. Franco, and J. Sepulveda High prevalence of low HDL cholesterol concentrations and mixed hyperlipidemia in a Mexican nationwide survey J. Lipid Res., August 1, 2001; 42(8): 1298 - 1307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. R. van Lennep, H. T. Westerveld, H. W. O. R. van Lennep, A. H. Zwinderman, D. W. Erkelens, and E. E. van der Wall Apolipoprotein Concentrations During Treatment and Recurrent Coronary Artery Disease Events Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., November 1, 2000; 20(11): 2408 - 2413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. A. Jacobson "The Lower the Better" in Hypercholesterolemia Therapy: A Reliable Clinical Guideline? Ann Intern Med, October 3, 2000; 133(7): 549 - 554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Forrester, C. N. Bairey-Merz, and S. Kaul The aggressive low density lipoprotein lowering controversy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2000; 36(4): 1419 - 1425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. A. McAlister, A. Laupacis, G. A. Wells, D. L. Sackett, and for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: XIX. Applying Clinical Trial Results; B. Guidelines for Determining Whether a Drug Is Exerting (More Than) a Class Effect JAMA, October 13, 1999; 282(14): 1371 - 1377. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. M. Sacks, L. A. Moye, B. R. Davis, T. G. Cole, J. L. Rouleau, D. T. Nash, M. A. Pfeffer, and E. Braunwald Relationship Between Plasma LDL Concentrations During Treatment With Pravastatin and Recurrent Coronary Events in the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial Circulation, April 21, 1998; 97(15): 1446 - 1452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]