Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2009;29:232-238
Published online before print December 12, 2008, doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.179457
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/2/232    most recent
ATVBAHA.108.179457v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hegner, B.
Right arrow Articles by Dragun, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hegner, B.
Right arrow Articles by Dragun, D.
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2009;29:232.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Cell Biology/Signaling

mTOR Regulates Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Differentiation From Human Bone Marrow–Derived Mesenchymal Progenitors

Björn Hegner; Maria Lange; Angelika Kusch; Kirill Essin; Orhan Sezer; Eckhard Schulze-Lohoff; Friedrich C. Luft; Maik Gollasch; Duska Dragun

From the Clinic for Nephrology and Intensive Care Medicine (B.H., M.L., A.K., K.E., M.G., D.D.), Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, the Center for Cardiovascular Research (B.H., M.L., A.K., D.D.), Experimental and Clinical Research Center (K.E., F.C.L., M.G.), Clinic for Hematology and Oncology (O.S.), Charité Campus Mitte, Berlin; the Department of Medicine I (E.S.-L.), Cologne General Hospital, Cologne; and Max-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and HELIOS Klinikum (F.C.L.), Berlin, Germany.

Correspondence to Dr Duska Dragun, Clinic for Nephrology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Campus Virchow Klinihum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany. E-mail duska.dragun{at}charite.de


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Objective— Vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) and circulating mesenchymal progenitor cells (MSCs) with a VSMC phenotype contribute to neointima formation and lumen loss after angioplasty and during allograft arteriosclerosis. We hypothesized that phosphoinositol-Akt-mammalian target of rapamycin-p70S6 kinase (PI3K/Akt/mTOR/p70S6K) pathway activation regulates VSMC differentiation from MSCs.

Methods and Results— We studied effects of PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling on phenotypic modulation of MSC and VSMC marker expression, including L-type Ca(2+) channels. Phosphorylation of Akt and p70S6K featured downregulation of VSMC markers in dedifferentiated MSCs. mTOR inhibition with rapamycin at below pharmacological concentrations blocked p70S6K phosphorylation and induced a differentiated contractile phenotype with smooth muscle (sm)-calponin, sm-{alpha}-actin, and SM protein 22-alpha (SM22{alpha}) expression. The PI3K inhibitor Ly294002 abolished Akt and p70S6K phosphorylation and reversed the dedifferentiated phenotype via induction of sm-calponin, sm-{alpha}-actin, SM22{alpha}, and myosin light chain kinase. Rapamycin acted antiproliferative without impairing MSC viability. In VSMCs, rapamycin increased a homing chemokine for MSCs, stromal cell–derived factor-1–alpha, at mRNA and protein levels. The CXCR4-mediated MSC migration toward conditioned medium of rapamycin-treated VSMCs was enhanced.

Conclusions— We describe novel pleiotropic effects of rapamycin at very low concentrations that stabilized differentiated contractile VSMCs from MSCs in addition to exerting antiproliferative and enhanced homing effects.


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Extensive neointima formation is a primary pathophysiologic mechanism of postintervention restenosis and transplant arteriosclerosis.1 Until recently, the neointima formation was attributed to uncontrolled proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) that migrate from the media and replace the intima of affected arteries.2 A phenotypic switch from a contractile to a proliferative and less differentiated synthetic phenotype accompanies the migration process.3 Animal and human studies have indicated that neointimal cells may not only originate from the vascular media or adventitia, but also from bone marrow– and nonmarrow-derived progenitors. The cells migrate on injury to affected vasculature and actively become part of neointima formation by differentiating into VSMCs.4,5 Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in particular seem to have a high potential for neointimal growth.6 The precise mechanisms responsible for differentiation and homing of VSMC precursors are unknown. The phosphoinositol-Akt-mammalian target of rapamycin-p70S6 kinase (PI3K/Akt/mTOR/p70S6K) pathway regulates cell growth and cell differentiation in response to nutrients, growth factors, and cytokines.7 Pharmacological rapamycin inhibition of mTOR markedly reduces transplant vasculopathy progression in recipients of cardiac8,9 and renal transplants.10 Comparison of rapamycin-eluting stents with paclitaxel-eluting stents documented the superiority of rapamycin-eluting stents in terms of preventing late in-stent lumen loss and a lower incidence of in-stent restenosis.11 Based on our previous findings on VSMC differentiation of human bone marrow MSCs,12 we investigated activation and inhibition of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR/p70S6K pathway in the phenotypic modulation and expression of VSMC markers in MSCs. We also sought to determine how low-dose mTOR inhibition influences MSC proliferation and migration.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Cell Culture
Human MSCs were isolated by plastic adherence from aspirated iliac crest marrow from consenting normal adult donors and cultured as described previously.12 Passages 2 to 6 were used for experiments. Under these culture conditions MSCs maintain multilineage differentiation capacity,12 are positive for CD73, CD90, and CD105 and negative for CD11b, CD14, CD19, CD34, CD45, CD79alpha, and HLA-DR (supplemental Figure I, available online at http://atvb.ahajournals.org), thereby meeting the criteria for MSCs.13 Human coronary artery VSMCs were obtained from Lonza (Cambiex Bio Science, Walkersville, Md).

Ca2+ Imaging
Cells were seeded onto glass coverslips and loaded with the Ca2+ indicator fluo-4-AM (Invitrogen). Changes in intracellular calcium were expressed as relative fluorescence changes, ie, F/Fo (with Fo indicating the fluorescence before stimulation and F the time-dependent fluorescence signal after stimulation) as described previously.14

Western Blotting
Western blots were performed according to standard procedures as described previously.12

BrdU Incorporation and MTT Assays
Cell proliferation was measured as BrdU incorporation (BrdU cell proliferation kit, Roche) in MSCs grown in presence of 10% FCS and rapamycin for 24 hours. Cytotoxicity was tested in MSCs incubated with rapamycin for 24 hours and addition of 1.5 mmol/L 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) during the last 4 hours. Absorption was measured at 570 nm in an ELISA reader.

Quantitative Real-Time PCR
VSMCs and MSCs were grown serum-free for 24 hours before incubation with rapamycin for 8 hours. Total RNA was extracted using the phenol/chloroform method and transcribed into cDNA with the PCR core kit (Roche). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using a Roche Light Cycler system.

SDF-1{alpha} ELISA
VSMCs grown with serum-free DMEM were incubated with control or rapamycin for 72 hours. SDF-1{alpha} in supernatants was measured with a human SDF-1{alpha} ELISA (R&D Systems) and normalized to total protein content.

MSC Migration on Conditioned Medium of Rapamycin-Treated VSMCs
Supernatants of VSMCs cultured for 72 hours with or without rapamycin were applied to the lower chamber of a micro chemotaxis chamber (Neuro Probe). MSCs in serum-free DMEM in presence of control IgG or anti-CXCR4 (R&D Systems) were seeded in the upper chamber and allowed to migrate for 24 hours. Migrated cells on the bottom side were stained with crystal violet. Absorbance was measured with an ELISA reader at 570 nm. Results were normalized to total protein content of the supernatants.

Statistical Analysis
Values for calcium influx are given as mean±SEM and were compared by Student t test. Band intensities of smooth muscle markers were normalized to {alpha}-tubulin. Control without treatment was set 1.00. Analysis of multiple blots is expressed as mean±SD. The Kruskal—Wallis test was used for multiple comparisons, whereas pairwise comparison with control was done using Mann–Whitney U test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Please see supplemental materials for expanded methods section and for detailed figure legends.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Resting MSCs Have Functional VSMC-Like L-Type Calcium Channels
Voltage-dependent dihydropyridine-sensitive (Cav1.2) L-type Ca2+ channels represent a specific marker of differentiated VSMCs15,16 and play a key role in excitation-contraction coupling in terminally differentiated contractile VSMCs.17 Based on our findings that resting MSCs with multilineage differentiation potential express smooth muscle specific contractile proteins,12 we investigated whether or not they would display functional L-type Cav1.2 Ca2+ channels. We studied how L-type Ca2+ channel activation relates to the expression of contractile proteins during MSC differentiation and dedifferentiation. We applied culture conditions in which MSCs maintain their capability to differentiate into several cell types such as adipocytes and osteoblasts, as previously established.12 We observed an increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentrations ([Ca2+]i) when MSCs loaded with the calcium sensitive fluorescent dye fluo-4 were depolarized with iso-osmotic 60 mmol/L KCl (Figure 1A and 1E). This increase in [Ca2+]i was largely blocked by preincubation of the cells with 1 µmol/L nimodipine (Figure 1B and 1E). MSC dedifferentiation can be reproducibly achieved by incubation with nontoxic DMSO concentrations.12 After incubation of MSCs with 1.25% DMSO for 8 days, the Ca2+ responses to KCl were significantly reduced and nimodipine did not have a significant effect on KCl-induced Ca2+ influx (Figure 1C, 1D, and 1E). The results suggest that multipotent MSCs share important features of VSMCs by expressing functional L-type Cav1.2 Ca2+ channels, which represent a specific marker of differentiated VSMCs and are required for excitation-contraction coupling.14


Figure 1
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. MSCs express functional VSMC like L-type Ca2+ channels. Calcium transients without (A) and after (B) nimodipine pretreatment. Calcium transients after treatment with DMSO without (C) and after (D) nimodipine pretreatment. E, Peak amplitudes of calcium transients. Numbers above bars indicate number of cells. Mean values±SEM, *P<0.05.

The PI3K/Akt/mTOR Pathway Is Activated in Dedifferentiated MSCs
Akt links signals downstream from PI3K-coupled growth factor receptors to mTOR, whereas p70S6K, which is downstream from mTOR, governs protein synthesis.18 We tested the activation status of Akt and p70S6K in differentiated and dedifferentiated MSCs by immunoblotting with phospho-specific antibodies. Treatment with 1.25% DMSO induced a strong (10-fold) increase in phosphorylated Akt, the downstream target of PI3K (Figure 2A and 2B) without change in total Akt. The maximal phosphorylation occurred rapidly after 10 minutes and persisted for 30 minutes. Preincubation with Ly294002, a specific PI3K inhibitor, for 30 minutes completely blocked Akt phosphorylation (Figure 2C). DMSO also induced a strong (5-fold) increase in p70S6K phosphorylation at the mTOR-dependent Thr389 phosphorylation site (Figure 2D and 2E). Compared to Akt, the maximal increase in p70S6K phosphorylation occurred after 30 minutes, consistent with the more downstream location of p70S6K in the pathway. Preincubation with pharmacological 6 nmol/L rapamycin concentration for 30 minutes entirely abrogated p70S6K phosphorylation at Thr389 (Figure 2F). As expected, Akt phosphorylation was not influenced by rapamycin preincubation (data not shown). Preincubation with Ly294002, targeting PI3K upstream from mTOR, achieved the same inhibitory effect on p70S6K phosphorylation at Thr389 (data not shown).


Figure 2
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR-pathway in MSCs by 1.25% DMSO. A, Densitometric analysis of pAkt normalized to total Akt. B, Representative Western blots. C, Ly294002 preincubation abolished Akt phosphorylation. D, Densitometric analysis of phosphorylated p70S6K normalized to total p70S6K. E, Representative Western blots. F, Rapamycin preincubation abolished p70S6K phosphorylation.

PI3K/Akt/mTOR-Pathway Blockade Preserves the Differentiated MSC Phenotype and Induces Expression of VSMC Antigens
To further establish the notion that VSMC differentiation and the phenotypic switch from differentiated and contractile to a less differentiated MSC phenotype is regulated via the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway, we performed coincubation studies with specific inhibitors of different signaling elements. Under culture conditions in which MSCs retain their pluripotent differentiation potential, VSMC-like progenitors change from large cells with prominent stress fibers to spindle-shaped cells without stress fibers after 8 days of 1.25% DMSO incubation (supplemental Figure IIA and IIB). This morphological transformation was accompanied by marked downregulation of the smooth muscle marker proteins sm-calponin, MLCK, and sm-{alpha}-actin, indicating dedifferentiation of MSCs.12 When we coincubated cells for 8 days with 1.25% DMSO together with the PI3K inhibitor Ly294002 at 15 µmol/L concentration or with 6 nmol/L rapamycin, MSCs preserved their VSMC-like phenotype (supplemental Figure IIC and IID).

In additional experiments, we tested whether or not PI3K inhibition mediated the switch toward differentiated contractile phenotype in MSCs and induces the expression of VSMC antigens. Quiescent MSCs with the contractile phenotype express the VSMC markers sm-calponin (Figure 3A), sm-{alpha}-actin (Figure 3B), SM22{alpha} (Figure 3C), and the short MLCK isoform (Figure 3D). Incubation with 1.25% DMSO downregulated all 4 markers. In contrast, blockade of PI3K with 5 and 15 µmol/L Ly294002 reversed DMSO-mediated downregulation of all smooth muscle markers, as shown by Western blot analysis.


Figure 3
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. PI3K inhibitor Ly294002 induced upregulation of VSMC marker proteins in MSCs treated with 1.25% DMSO for 8 days. A, sm-calponin. B, sm-{alpha}-actin. C, SM22{alpha}. D, Short MLCK. E, {alpha}-tubulin. Representative Western blots and densitometric analysis normalized to {alpha}-tubulin. *P<0.05 for comparison with control, #P<0.05 for comparison with DMSO.

Rapamycin Promotes VSMC Marker Expression in Quiescent MSCs
Our data supported the hypothesis that the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway regulates VSMC differentiation from MSCs and that activation of this pathway induces dedifferentiation and loss of the contractile phenotype. We next studied whether or not modulation of the downstream element, mTOR, would also enhance spontaneous VSMC differentiation from quiescent MSCs in culture. Incubation of MSCs with rapamycin for 8 days at concentrations even below the recommended levels used in transplant patients, as low as 1 nmol/L, resulted in upregulation of VSMC antigens sm-calponin (supplemental Figure IIIA), {alpha}-smooth muscle actin (supplemental Figure IIIB), SM22{alpha} (supplemental Figure IIIC), but had no influence on the short MLCK isoform (supplemental Figure IIID). The observed effects on VSMC antigen expression were not further enhanced by the recommended low pharmacological 6 nmol/L rapamycin concentration or at suprapharmacologic 20 and 100 nmol/L concentrations.

Rapamycin Acts Antiproliferative on MSCs Without Impairment of Viability
Beneficial effects of rapamycin and its derivatives on prevention of neointima formation during transplant vasculopathy or after angioplastic interventions were attributed to antiproliferative effects via prevention of cell cycle progression from G1 to S phase.19 We tested the antiproliferative effects in MSCs cultured in medium containing increasing rapamycin concentrations for 24 hours by measuring BrdU incorporation into newly synthesized DNA. Rapamycin exerted a potent antiproliferative effect (–50%) at below pharmacological concentrations as low as 1 nmol/L (Figure 4A). Therapeutic concentrations of rapamycin and the derivative everolimus in transplant patients are in the 4 to 10 nmol/L range.20,21 There was no additional proliferation inhibition at above pharmacological concentrations up to 100 nmol/L. To exclude the possibility that the observed decrease in DNA synthesis was related to cytotoxic effects, we analyzed cell viability by the MTT assay. MSCs were exposed to the same increasing rapamycin concentrations for 24 hours. We observed no toxic effects of rapamycin on MSCs, even at suprapharmacological concentrations (Figure 4B).


Figure 4
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Rapamycin acts antiproliferative but not cytotoxic on MSCs. A, Measurement of incorporated BrdU during 24-hour incubation with rapamycin. B, MTT assay after 24 hours of treatment with rapamycin. n=3, mean values±SD, *P<0.05.

Rapamycin Induces SDF-1 Expression in VSMCs and Enhances MSC Migration
VSMCs are target cells of injury during allograft rejection or after angioplastic interventions. Vascular cells secrete the chemokine SDF-1{alpha} as part of the response to injury and interact with target receptor CXCR4 expressed on MSCs.22 SDF-1{alpha} stimulates MSC migration. Furthermore, there is evidence that MSCs are mobilized by and directed to sites of tissue injury by a SDF-1{alpha} gradient.22 We tested how mTOR inhibition could affect VSMC SDF-1{alpha} secretion and influence mobilization and homing of MSCs. Human coronary VSMCs were incubated with pharmacological 6 nmol/L rapamycin concentrations and analyzed for SDF-1{alpha} mRNA expression and secretion of SDF-1{alpha} protein. SDF-1{alpha} mRNA was significantly upregulated after eight hours (Figure 5A), whereas secretion of SDF-1{alpha} protein (Figure 5B) increased after 72 hours of rapamycin incubation. We also documented enhanced CXCR4-mediated migration of MSCs toward conditioned medium of rapamycin-stimulated VSMCs in Boyden chamber model (Figure 5C).


Figure 5
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. Rapamycin induces the homing chemokine SDF-1{alpha} and enhances migration of MSCs toward VSMCs. A, SDF-1{alpha} mRNA in rapamycin-treated VSMCs. B, Secreted SDF-1{alpha} in supernatant of VSMCs. C, Enhanced CXCR4-dependent migration of MSCs to conditioned medium of VSMCs treated with rapamycin. n=4, mean values±SD, *P<0.05.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Recipient-derived hematopoietic and mesenchymal progenitor cells contribute to neointima formation after extensive injury to the vascular media. We identified a critical role for PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway activation in VSMC differentiation in mesenchymal progenitors. Pharmacological PI3K inhibition by Ly294002, as well as mTOR inhibition by rapamycin, modulated several aspects of MSC physiology including induction of a VSMC-like differentiated state and induction of a protective contractile phenotype in MSCs. In parallel, rapamycin exerted a potent antiproliferative effect on MSCs without signs of toxicity. Finally, rapamycin also interfered with mobilization and homing of MSCs by induction of SDF-1{alpha} in VSMCs and MSC migration. We describe novel effects, even at very low doses of mTOR inhibition on MSCs, and propose protective phenotypic switching together with MSC homing modulation. We believe our findings serve to explain the unique potential of mTOR inhibitors that extend beyond antiproliferatiion and T-cell suppression.

The finding that rapamycin promotes a VSMC-like differentiated contractile phenotype in MSCs is compelling and may facilitate the understanding of several unexplained beneficial and adverse effects observed in transplant recipients treated with mTOR inhibitors or in patients with rapamycin-coated stents. Both rapamycin23 and the derivative everolimus8 are superior to other immunosuppressants in prevention and treatment of transplant vasculopathy in patients with cardiac allografts. Comparison of rapamycin-eluting stents with paclitaxel-eluting stents documented the superiority of rapamycin-eluting stents in terms of preventing late in-stent lumen loss and a lower incidence of in-stent restenosis.11 Similar results were reported in high-risk patients with diabetes mellitus.24 Stronger beneficial effects of rapamycin-eluting stents were thus far attributed to more prominent effects of rapamycin on VSMC proliferation and migration, lesser cytotoxicity, and stronger effect on Akt activation compared to paclitaxel.25 Similar to local drug delivery, oral rapamycin for 10 days beginning 2 days before angioplastic reintervention resulted in a significantly reduced restenosis rate in rapamycin-treated patients compared to control patients.26

Some of the rapamycin-induced effects on MSCs with the VSMC-like phenotype in terms of potent antiproliferative and lack of cytotoxic effects are consistent with studies performed in VSMCs.27 However, proliferation inhibition alone is not sufficient to promote VSMC differentiation.28 Subtle changes in signaling mechanisms may be responsible for injury-specific phenotypic changes. Loss of the contractile phenotype is faster and more prominent in transplant vasculopathy compared to atherosclerosis of native vessels.29 Transition of the contractile to the synthetic phenotype is also regulated by mTOR in VSMCs.30 Rapamycin-mediated effects on VSMC differentiation were attributed to mTOR/PI3K feedback in VSMCs.31 The authors proposed that a unique signaling pattern where S6K1, downstream from mTOR, is inhibited and Akt, upstream from mTOR but downstream from PI3K, is activated results in optimal differentiation signals and induction of contractile phenotypic markers.31 We did not focus on mTOR/PI3K feedback. Nevertheless, Akt phosphorylation was not influenced by rapamycin in quiescent MSCs. Furthermore, we documented not only reprogramming toward the differentiated state in dedifferentiated cells, but also increased VSMC marker protein expression in resting MSCs after mTOR Inhibition. Interestingly, VSMCs were described as "multifunctional mesenchymal cells" forty years ago,32 anticipating the later findings of MSCs as subpopulations of VSMCs within the vascular wall. Location and type of injury may determine the importance of MSC accumulation.33

Severe injury of the vascular media that occurs after angioplasty or during allograft vascular rejection is prerequisite for progenitor cell homing and lesion repair.33 Peritransplant ischemic injury is associated with significant SDF-1{alpha} upregulation in cardiac allografts.34 SDF-1{alpha} probably serves to recruit stem cells in response to hypoxic injury.35 Rapamycin inhibits VSMC migration.36 Rapamycin increased expression and secretion of SDF-1{alpha} in VSMCs, an effect that has not been previously described. CXCR4-dependent MSC migration to conditioned medium of rapamycin-treated VSMCs was also enhanced. Thus, rapamycin probably enhances, or at least does not impair, MSC migration and homing to target cells after vascular injury. Most studies on progenitor cell homing and differentiation in vitro and in vivo refer to cells of hematopoietic origin.22 Hematopoietic cells isolated from buffy coats cultured in platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-BB–enriched medium can also acquire the VSMC-like phenotype and express {alpha}-smooth muscle actin and calponin.37 In mouse model of severe wire-induced femoral artery injury, locally delivered rapamycin decreased the number of bone marrow–derived CD45-positive hematopoietic cells and attenuated neointima formation.38 Induction of cell death in endothelial progenitors after rapamycin treatment may offer an explanation for this observation. Our data add to the complexity of rapamycin-mediated actions that also may help explain effects observed in other lineages. Rapamycin may influence differentiation process through opposing cell-type specific effects. For example, rapamycin induces hematopoietic differentiation,39 yet inhibits adipocyte differentiation40 and chondrogenesis.41 The PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway is also critically involved in tumor biology. Simultaneous promotion of beneficial phenotypic switch together with antiproliferative and antiangiogenic effects may explain the reduced incidence of tumors in patients treated with mTOR inhibitors.42 Bone marrow–derived MSCs are also implicated in the initiation and progression of cancer metastasis.43

Dose-related side effects limit the use of mTOR inhibitors in transplant patients. Our finding that the pleiotropic effects were already operative at the 1 nmol/L concentration, 8-fold below the recommended trough rapamycin or everolimus levels, inspires confidence in the relevance of our findings.20,21 Poor wound healing that is associated with higher trough levels is well documented for mTOR inhibitors.44 Control of amount of drug release in eluting stents is becoming an increasingly important issue that enables application of different target drug concentrations.45 We suggest that our data may well fit to these concepts. We believe that mTOR inhibition at very low concentrations may open new treatment options with minimal side effects to suppress the development of transplant arteriosclerosis and postintervention restenosis.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Sources of Funding

This work was supported by Charité intramural funds.

Disclosures

Dr Hegner and Dr Dragun received travel grants by Novartis Pharma GmbH and Wyeth Pharma GmbH.


*    Footnotes
 
Received February 8, 2008; revision accepted November 27, 2008.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Dzau VJ, Braun-Dullaeus RC, Sedding DG. Vascular proliferation and atherosclerosis: new perspectives and therapeutic strategies. Nat Med. 2002; 8: 1249–1256.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Libby P, Pober JS. Chronic rejection. Immunity. 2001; 14: 387–397.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Owens GK, Kumar MS, Wamhoff BR. Molecular regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation in development and disease. Physiol Rev. 2004; 84: 767–801.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Hillebrands JL, Klatter FA, van den Hurk BM, Popa ER, Nieuwenhuis P, Rozing J. Origin of neointimal endothelium and alpha-actin-positive smooth muscle cells in transplant arteriosclerosis. J Clin Invest. 2001; 107: 1411–1422.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Grimm PC, Nickerson P, Jeffery J, Savani RC, Gough J, McKenna RM, Stern E, Rush DN. Neointimal and tubulointerstitial infiltration by recipient mesenchymal cells in chronic renal-allograft rejection. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 93–97.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Wang CH, Cherng WJ, Yang NI, Kuo LT, Hsu CM, Yeh HI, Lan YJ, Yeh CH, Stanford WL. Late-outgrowth endothelial cells attenuate intimal hyperplasia contributed by mesenchymal stem cells after vascular injury. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008; 28: 54–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Corradetti MN, Guan KL. Upstream of the mammalian target of rapamycin: do all roads pass through mTOR? Oncogene. 2006; 25: 6347–6360.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Eisen HJ, Tuzcu EM, Dorent R, Kobashigawa J, Mancini D, Valantine-von Kaeppler HA, Starling RC, Sørensen K, Hummel M, Lind JM, Abeywickrama KH, Bernhardt P; RAD B253 Study Group. Everolimus for the prevention of allograft rejection and vasculopathy in cardiac-transplant recipients. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349: 847–858.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Viganò M, Tuzcu M, Benza R, Boissonnat P, Haverich A, Hill J, Laufer G, Love R, Parameshwar J, Pulpón LA, Renlund D, Abeywickrama K, Cretin N, Starling RC, Eisen HJ; RAD B253 Study Group. Prevention of acute rejection and allograft vasculopathy by everolimus in cardiac transplants recipients: a 24-month analysis. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007; 26: 584–592.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Liu M, Zhang W, Gu M, Yin C, Zhang WY, Lv Q, Xu D. Protective effects of sirolimus by attenuating connective tissue growth factor expression in human chronic allograft nephropathy. Transplant Proc. 2007; 39: 1410–1415.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Windecker S, Remondino A, Eberli FR, Jüni P, Räber L, Wenaweser P, Togni M, Billinger M, Tüller D, Seiler C, Roffi M, Corti R, Sütsch G, Maier W, Lüscher T, Hess OM, Egger M, Meier B. Sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353: 653–662.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Hegner B, Weber M, Dragun D, Schulze-Lohoff E. Differential regulation of smooth muscle markers in human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J Hypertens. 2005; 23: 1191–1202.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini F, Krause D, Deans R, Keating A, Prockop Dj, Horwitz E. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2006; 8: 315–317.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Essin K, Welling A, Hofmann F, Luft FC, Gollasch M, Moosmang S. Indirect coupling between Cav1.2 channels and ryanodine receptors to generate Ca2+ sparks in murine arterial smooth muscle cells. J Physiol. 2007; 584: 205–219.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Gollasch M, Haase H, Ried C, Lindschau C, Morano I, Luft FC, Haller H. L-type calcium channel expression depends on the differentiated state of vascular smooth muscle cells. FASEB J. 1998; 12: 593–601.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Wamhoff BR, Bowles DK, McDonald OG, Sinha S, Somlyo AP, Somlyo AV, Owens GK. L-type voltage-gated Ca2+ channels modulate expression of smooth muscle differentiation marker genes via a rho kinase/myocardin/SRF-dependent mechanism. Circ Res. 2004; 95: 406–414.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Moosmang S, Schulla V, Welling A, Feil R, Feil S, Wegener JW, Hofmann F, Klugbauer N. Dominant role of smooth muscle L-type calcium channel Cav1.2 for blood pressure regulation. EMBO J. 2003; 22: 6027–6034.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Hay N, Sonenberg N. Upstream and downstream of mTOR. Genes Dev. 2004; 18: 1926–1945.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Wiederrecht GJ, Sabers CJ, Brunn GJ, Martin MM, Dumont FJ, Abraham RT. Mechanism of action of rapamycin: new insights into the regulation of G1-phase progression in eukaryotic cells. Prog Cell Cycle Res. 1995; 1: 53–71.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Grinyó JM, Cruzado JM. Mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus combination in renal transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2006; 6: 1991–1999.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Gustafsson F, Ross HJ. Proliferation signal inhibitors in cardiac transplantation. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2007; 22: 111–116.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Schober A. Chemokines in vascular dysfunction and remodeling. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008;28:epub.

23. Keogh A, Richardson M, Ruygrok P, Spratt P, Galbraith A, O'Driscoll G, Macdonald P, Esmore D, Muller D, Faddy S. Sirolimus in de novo heart transplant recipients reduces acute rejection and prevents coronary artery disease at 2 years: a randomized clinical trial. Circulation. 2004; 110: 2694–2700.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Dibra A, Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Pache J, Schühlen H, von Beckerath N, Ulm K, Wessely R, Dirschinger J, Schömig A; ISAR-DIABETES Study Investigators. Paclitaxel-eluting or sirolimus-eluting stents to prevent restenosis in diabetic patients. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353: 663–670.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Patterson C, Mapera S, Li HH, Madamanchi N, Hilliard E, Lineberger R, Herrmann R, Charles P. Comparative effects of paclitaxel and rapamycin on smooth muscle migration and survival: role of AKT-dependent signaling. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006; 26: 1473–1480.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Hausleiter J, Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Vogeser M, Zohlnhöfer D, Schühlen H, Goos C, Pache J, Dotzer F, Pogatsa-Murray G, Dirschinger J, Heemann U, Schömig A; OSIRIS Investigators. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of oral sirolimus for restenosis prevention in patients with in-stent restenosis: the Oral Sirolimus to Inhibit Recurrent In-stent Stenosis (OSIRIS) trial. Circulation. 2004; 110: 790–795.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Rosner D, McCarthy N, Bennett M. Rapamycin inhibits human in stent restenosis vascular smooth muscle cells independently of pRB phosphorylation and p53. Cardiovasc Res. 2005; 66: 601–610.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. O'Brien ER, Alpers CE, Stewart DK, Ferguson M, Tran N, Gordon D, Benditt EP, Hinohara T, Simpson JB, Schwartz SM. Proliferation in primary and restenotic coronary atherectomy tissue. Implications for antiproliferative therapy. Circ Res. 1993; 73: 223–231.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Rahmani M, Cruz RP, Granville DJ, McManus BM. Allograft vasculopathy versus atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 2006; 99: 801–815.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Martin KA, Rzucidlo EM, Merenick BL, Fingar DC, Brown DJ, Wagner RJ, Powell RJ. The mTOR/p70 S6K1 pathway regulates vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2004; 286: C507–C517.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Martin KA, Merenick BL, Ding M, Fetalvero KM, Rzucidlo EM, Kozul CD, Brown DJ, Chiu HY, Shyu M, Drapeau BL, Wagner RJ, Powell RJ. Rapamycin promotes vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation through insulin receptor substrate-1/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt2 feedback signaling. J Biol Chem. 2007; 282: 36112–36120.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Wissler RW, Vesselinovitch D. Comparative pathogenetic patterns in atherosclerosis. Adv Lipid Res. 1968; 6: 181–206.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Sata M. Role of circulating vascular progenitors in angiogenesis, vascular healing, and pulmonary hypertension: lessons from animal models. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006; 26: 1008–1014.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Yamani MH, Ratliff NB, Cook DJ, Tuzcu EM, Yu Y, Hobbs R, Rincon G, Bott-Silverman C, Young JB, Smedira N, Starling RC. Peritransplant ischemic injury is associated with up-regulation of stromal cell-derived factor-1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46: 1029–1035.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Ceradini DJ, Kulkarni AR, Callaghan MJ, Tepper OM, Bastidas N, Kleinman ME, Capla JM, Galiano RD, Levine JP, Gurtner GC. Progenitor cell trafficking is regulated by hypoxic gradients through HIF-1 induction of SDF-1. Nat Med. 2004; 10: 858–864.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

36. Poon M, Marx SO, Gallo R, Badimon JJ, Taubman MB, Marks AR. Rapamycin inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell migration. J Clin Invest. 1996; 98: 2277–2283.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

37. Simper D, Stalboerger PG, Panetta CJ, Wang S, Caplice NM. Smooth muscle progenitor cells in human blood. Circulation. 2002; 106: 1199–1204.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Fukuda D, Sata M, Tanaka K, Nagai R. Potent inhibitory effect of sirolimus on circulating vascular progenitor cells. Circulation. 2005; 111: 926–931.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Yamamoto-Yamaguchi Y, Okabe-Kado J, Kasukabe T, Honma Y. Induction of differentiation of human myeloid leukemia cells by immunosuppressant macrolides (rapamycin and FK506) and calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase inhibitors. Exp Hematol. 2001; 29: 582–588.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

40. Gagnon A, Lau S, Sorisky A. Rapamycin-sensitive phase of 3T3–L1 preadipocyte differentiation after clonal expansion. J Cell Physiol. 2001; 189: 14–22.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

41. Oh CD, Kim SJ, Ju JW, Song WK, Kim JH, Yoo YJ, Chun JS. Immunosuppressant rapamycin inhibits protein kinase C alpha and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase leading to the inhibition of chondrogenesis. Eur J Pharmacol. 2001; 427: 175–185.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

42. Campistol JM, Eris J, Oberbauer R, Friend P, Hutchison B, Morales JM, Claesson K, Stallone G, Russ G, Rostaing L, Kreis H, Burke JT, Brault Y, Scarola JA, Neylan JF. Sirolimus therapy after early cyclosporine withdrawal reduces the risk for cancer in adult renal transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006; 17: 581–589.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

43. Väänänen HK. Mesenchymal stem cells. Ann Med. 2005; 37: 469–479.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

44. Pascual J, Boletis IN, Campistol JM. Everolimus (Certican) in renal transplantation: a review of clinical trial data, current usage and future directions. Transplant Rev. 2006; 20: 1–18.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

45. Wessely R, Hausleiter J, Michaelis C, Jaschke B, Vogeser M, Milz S, Behnisch B, Schratzenstaller T, Renke-Gluszko M, Stöver M, Wintermantel E, Kastrati A, Schömig A. Inhibition of neointima formation by a novel drug-eluting stent system that allows for dose-adjustable, multiple, and on-site stent coating. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005; 25: 748–753.[Abstract/Free Full Text]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/2/232    most recent
ATVBAHA.108.179457v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hegner, B.
Right arrow Articles by Dragun, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hegner, B.
Right arrow Articles by Dragun, D.