Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2008;28:1123-1129
Published online before print March 13, 2008, doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.161190
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/6/1123    most recent
ATVBAHA.107.161190v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Webler, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Webler, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, I.
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2008;28:1123.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Integrative Physiology/Experimental Medicine

Cytochrome P450 2C9-Induced Angiogenesis Is Dependent on EphB4

Anke C. Webler; Rüdiger Popp; Thomas Korff; U. Ruth Michaelis; Carmen Urbich; Rudi Busse{dagger}; Ingrid Fleming

From the Vascular Signalling Group (A.C.W., R.P., U.R.M., R.B., I.F.), Institut für Kardiovaskuläre Physiologie; and Molecular Cardiology (C.U.), Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt; and the Institute of Physiology and Pathophysiology (T.K.), University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany.

Correspondence to Ingrid Fleming, PhD, Vascular Signalling Group, Institut für Kardiovaskuläre Physiologie, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Germany. E-mail fleming{at}em.uni-frankfurt.de


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Objective— Cytochrome P450 (CYP) epoxygenase-derived epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs) are known to stimulate angiogenesis, but the mechanisms involved are incompletely understood. Because EphB4 is involved in vascular development, the aim of this study was to investigate whether, and to what extent, EphB4 is part of the signaling cascade that results in CYP2C9-mediated angiogenesis.

Methods and Results— CYP2C9 overexpression as well as stimulation with 11,12-EET (up to 48 hours) time-dependently increased EphB4 expression in endothelial cells. This effect and the activation of the EphB4 promoter were mediated by the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (P13-K)/Akt pathway and sensitive to the P13-K inhibitor LY 294002 as well as to simultaneous transfection with dominant-negative Akt. 11,12-EET treatment also increased EphB4 expression in isolated mouse mesenteric arteries as well as in the vessels that developed in 11,12-EET-impregnated Matrigel plugs. Moreover, the CYP2C9-stimulated formation of capillary-like structures in a modified spheroid assay was markedly attenuated by EphB4 downregulation (antisense oligonucleotides). Using a parallel approach in vivo, the inclusion of siRNA directed against EphB4 in EET-impregnated Matrigel plugs prevented endothelial cell invasion and vascularization.

Conclusions— Our data indicate that EphB4 is a critical component of the CYP2C9- and 11,12-EET-activated signaling cascade that promotes angiogenesis in vitro as well as in vivo.


Key Words: Akt • angiogenesis • epoxyeicosatrienoic acid • siRNA


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Cytochrome P450 (CYP) epoxygenases, of the CYP2B, 2C, and 2J subfamilies are expressed in endothelial cells, and metabolize arachidonic acid to different regioisomers of epoxyeicosatrienoic acid (EET, for recent reviews see1,2). Interest in the vascular actions of CYP enzymes, and consequently EETs, was initially linked to their identification as endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factors (EDHFs).3,4 However, it is now generally appreciated that these compounds mediate a number of membrane potential-independent effects, including endothelial cell proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis.5

Relatively little is known about the molecular mechanisms underlying CYP epoxygenase/EET-induced angiogenesis. However, CYP epoxygenase-derived metabolites of arachidonic acid are reported to transactivate the EGF receptor by activating matrix metalloproteinases to release heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF) from the cell membrane.6,7 The EET-mediated activation of the EGF receptor leads in turn to the activation of the kinase Akt and an enhanced expression of cyclin D1. Other signaling pathways also contribute to the increase in cyclin D1 expression including the MAP kinase phosphatase-1 which decreases JNK activity.8 Activation of Akt by EETs also induces the phosphorylation and therefore inhibition of the forkhead factors FoxO1 and FoxO3a and subsequently a decrease in the expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27kip1.9

EphB4 receptor and its ligand ephrinB2 play an important role in neuronal patterning and vascular development during embryogenesis (for review see10). Although classically ephrinB2 was thought to be expressed in arterial endothelial cells whereas EphB4 was expressed preferentially in venous endothelial cells,11,12 more recent observations suggest that endothelial cells in newly developing vessels of the adult, at least in the cornea and remodeling rat mesenteric microvessels, express different members of the Eph/ephrin family of proteins, including ephrinB2 and EphB4.13,14

The aim of the present investigation was to assess the role of EphB4 in CYP2C-mediated angiogenesis in vitro as well as in vivo and to determine whether EETs contribute to angiogenic signaling pathways upstream of EphB4.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Materials
Matrigel was from BD Biosciences, 11,12-EET was from Cayman Chemicals and MSPPOH was kindly provided by John R. Falck (Dallas, Tex).15 The polyclonal antimouse EphB4 antibody was purchased from R&D Systems, and the monoclonal mouse anti-EphB4 antibody was from Zymed. The monoclonal anti-mouse PECAM-1 (clone: MEC 13.3) antibody was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, and the antibodies directed against Akt and phospho-Ser473 Akt were from Cell Signaling. All other substances were from Sigma.

Cell Culture
Human umbilical vein,16 porcine aortic,17 and murine lung endothelial cells18 were isolated and cultured as described previously. First passage human umbilical vein endothelial cells were used throughout. Porcine aortic and murine lung endothelial cells were used up to passage 5.

Adenoviral Transduction
Endothelial cells (80% confluent) were serum-starved for 10 hours before infection with adenoviral vectors. Cells were incubated with recombinant adenoviruses (10 pfU/cell) expressing either CYP2C9 sense or antisense cDNA in medium for 4 hours and afterward left to recover in medium containing 2% FCS. As reported previously,19 infection efficiency was between 90% and 100%, and those cells infected with CYP2C9 sense adenovirus generated approximately 2-fold more 11,12- and 14,15-EET under basal conditions than cells infected with the control (CYP2C9 antisense) virus. This increase in EET production was sensitive to the CYP2C9 inhibitor miconazole.

Downregulation of EphB4 Expression
EphB4 expression was downregulated in HUVECs using an antisense approach, as described.18 Briefly, endothelial cells (80% confluent) were treated with either EphB4 antisense oligonucleotides (5'-ATGGAGGCCTCGCTCAGAAA-3', 2 µmol/L) or control oligonucleotides (EphB4 scrambled: 5'-TACCTGAAGGTCAGGCGCAC-3', 2 µmol/L)20 using Gene Trans II according to the manufacturer’s instructions (MobiTec). Thereafter, cells were left to recover in medium containing 8% FCS.

Mouse lung endothelial cells were infected with either control or CYP2C9 adenoviruses and then immediately transfected with either a control siRNA (GFP) or 1 of 3 siRNAs directed against EphB4 (siRNA1: 5'-AAG-UAG-GUC-AAG-UUC-GUG-A99-3' siRNA2: 5'-UGU-CUC-CUA-UGU-CAA-GAU-U99-3', siRNA3: 5'AAU-CUU-GAC-AUA-GGA-GAC-3'), using TransPass HUVEC Transfection Reagent (New England BioLabs). Cells were then cultured in medium containing 2.5% FCS for an additional 48 hours.

Immunoblotting
Cells were lysed in sample buffer and separated by SDS-PAGE as described.7 Proteins were detected using specific antibodies as described in the results section.

Reporter Gene Assay
Porcine endothelial cells were transiently cotransfected with the EphB4 promoter luciferase construct as described,21 together with either pcDNA 3.1 or CYP2C9. After 36 hours, the cells were lysed, and luciferase activity was measured according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Promega).

Endothelial Cell Spheroids
Spheroids containing 400 cells were generated as described.22,23 After 24 hours in a collagen gel, angiogenesis was quantified by measuring the cumulative length of all capillary like sprouts originating from the central plane of an individual spheroid using a computer assisted microscope (Axio-Observer Z1, Zeiss). At least 5 randomly selected spheroids per experimental group and experiment were analyzed.

In Vivo Matrigel Plug Assay
Female C57BL/6 mice (8 weeks old) were lightly anesthetized with chloralhydrate (200 µL of a 4% solution, s.c.) and then injected with 0.5 mL of Matrigel impregnated with heparin (0,0025 U/mL s.c.) and 11,12-EET (10 µmol/L) and containing either a control siRNA (GFP; 2 µmol/L) or siRNA directed against EphB4 (siRNA1; 2 µmol/L) along the dorsal midline on each side of the spine. After 7 days the mice were euthanized, the Matrigel plugs removed, embedded in tissue tech (Sakura Finetec) and frozen. Plugs were then either cryo-sectioned (10 µm) and processed for staining for PECAM or harvested and washed with phosphate-buffered saline solution. The latter samples were mixed with water (200 µL), homogenized, and centrifuged at 14 000 rpm for 15 minutes to remove particulate material and the concentration of the hemoglobin contained in the plugs was determined at 595 nm using Drabkin reagent (Sigma). In some experiments Matrigel implants were fixed in zinc fixative overnight, dehydrated using alcohol and isopropanol, and processed for paraffin sectioning. EphB4 expression in the Matrigel plugs was determined using a polyglonal goat antimouse EphB4 antibody in combination with an enhanced detection method (Envision, DAKO) 3, 3'-diaminobenzidine enhanced liquid substrate system solution A and B (DAB) (Sigma) and Mayers Hematoxylin Solution (Sigma).

Vessel formation was quantified by analyzing pixel/area of at least 5 sections per plug using a computer-assisted program (Nikon NIS-Elements). The data obtained were normalized with respect to values recorded in the respective control.

EphB4 Expression in Isolated Mesenteric Arteries
Mesenteric arteries were isolated from male adult NMRI mice and incubated for 18 hours in DMEM supplemented with 15% FCS and either solvent (0.1% DMSO) or 11,12-EET (10 µmol/L). Blood vessels were then fixed in zinc overnight, dehydrated using alcohol and isopropanol and processed for paraffin sectioning. Staining for EphB4 was performed using paraffin sections (4 µm) and the polyclonal antimouse EphB4 in combination with Envision and tyramide-Cy3 (Perkin Elmer) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. EphB4 staining intensity was determined by using the Cell^R software analyzing at least 2 different sections per experimental group and animal. Exposure times during digital imaging were kept constant.

Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as mean±SE. Statistical analysis were performed by 1-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni multiple comparison test. Values of P<0.05 were considered statistically significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Effect of CYP2C9-Derived EETs on Endothelial EphB4 Expression In Vitro and In Vivo
Although CYP2C protein is expressed in native endothelial cells, expression levels decrease rapidly after cell isolation.12 Therefore, to determine whether or not a link exists between CYP2C9 and EphB4 expression, human umbilical vein endothelial cells were infected with either control (CYP2C9 antisense) or CYP2C9 overexpression viruses. Although low levels of EphB4 were detected in the endothelial cells used, CYP2C9-overexpression resulted in a 4-fold increase in EphB4 expression within 24 hours compared to control virus-treated cells (Figure 1A). The increase in EphB4 expression could be attributed to elevated CYP epoxygenase activity as the CYP2C9-induced (48 hours) increase in its expression was inhibited in the presence of the epoxygenase inhibitor, MSPPOH (10 µmol/L, Figure 1B). Moreover, exogenously applied 11,12-EET (1 µmol/L) was also able to elicit a time-dependent increase in endothelial EphB4 expression (Figure 1C). Although ephrinB2, the main ligand for EphB4 was expressed by the endothelial cells used, there was no detectable change in the expression of the protein after the overexpression of CYP2C9 (data not shown).


Figure 1
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Effect of CYP2C9 overexpression and 11,12-EET on EphB4 expression in vitro. Experiments were performed in the absence (A) and presence (B) of MSPPOH (MS). C, Time course of the 11,12–EET-induced increase in EphB4 expression. The bar graphs summarize data obtained in 3 to 9 independent experiments; *P<0.05, **P<0.001 vs the respective CTL/Sol.

To ensure that similar changes in EphB4 expression can be observed in endothelial cells in situ, isolated mesenteric arteries and vein were incubated with either solvent or 11,12-EET (1 µmol/L) and EphB4 was assessed by immunofluorescence after 18 hours. Quantification of fluorescence staining confirmed the EET-induced increase in EphB4 levels in mesenteric arteries (Figure 2A). Although EphB4 is reported to be preferentially expressed in veins,24 a much weaker response was detected in mesenteric vein endothelial cells treated with 11,12-EET (supplemental Figure I, available online at http://atvb.ahajournals.org).


Figure 2
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Effect of 11,12-EET on EphB4 expression in vivo. A, Mesenteric arteries were incubated with solvent (Sol) or 11,12-EET and the expression of EphB4 (red) and PECAM-1 (green) assessed. B, Representative section showing EphB4 expression in a Matrigel plug impregnated with 11,12-EET. The bar graph summarizes data obtained using vessels from 3 different animals; *P<0.05 vs Sol.

To determine whether a link exists between 11,12-EET and the in vivo expression of EphB4, Matrigel plugs were impregnated with 11,12-EET and implanted in mice for a total of 14 days. Thereafter, the expression of EphB4 in the Matrigel plug vessels was assessed by immunohistochemistry. As in the in vitro assays, we were able to detect EphB4 positive vessels in the Matrigel plugs (Figure 2B).

Effect of CYP2C9 Overexpression and Inhibition With LY 294002 on EphB4 Expression
As EETs, in particular 11,12- and 14,15-EET, have been reported to activate the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI 3-K)/Akt signaling pathway in endothelial cells,9,12 we assessed the effects of CYP2C9 overexpression on the activity of the EphB4 promoter and the consequences of PI 3-K inhibition on this response.

The overexpression of CYP2C9 significantly increased EphB4 promoter activity compared to that detected in cells transfected with pcDNA (Figure 3A). This increase in luciferase activity was prevented in cells treated with the PI 3-K inhibitor LY 294002 (1.5 µmol/L). Similar effects on the expression of EphB4 protein were observed (Figure 3B).


Figure 3
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Effect of PI 3-K/Akt pathway inhibition. EphB4 promoter activity (A) and protein expression (B) in cells lacking or overexpressing CYP2C9 was assessed in the absence and presence of LY294002. Effect of CYP2C9 on Akt phosphorylation (C) and effect of a dominant negative Akt (DN Akt) (D) on the CYP2C9-induced expression of EphB4. The bar graphs summarize data obtained in 3 to 4 independent experiments; *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 vs the respective CTL.

The overexpression of CYP2C9 resulted in the phosphorylation of Akt (Figure 3C), an observation that confirms our previous report.12 In the same cells, the tyrosine phosphorylation of EphB4 was enhanced (supplemental Figure II). We next determined whether or not a dominant negative Akt mutant could inhibit the CYP2C9-induced increase in EphB4 expression. As before, EphB4 expression increased in cells treated with CYP2C9 adenoviruses and transfected with pcDNA (Figure 3D). However, no increase in EphB4 was observed in cells overexpressing CYP2C9 and transfected with the dominant negative Akt mutant.

Effect of EphB4 Antisense Oligonucleotides on CYP2C9-Induced Endothelial Cell Sprouting In Vitro
To assess the impact of EphB4 on CYP2C9-mediated angiogenesis in vitro, we performed a collagen-based in vitro spheroid assay using cells treated with scrambled or antisense oligonucleotides directed against EphB4.

Whereas control (scrambled) oligonucleotides were without effect, the EphB4 antisense oligonucleotides decreased basal EphB4 protein levels in human endothelial cells and completely prevented the CYP2C9-induced increase in protein expression (Figure 4A). We next incubated CYP2C9-overexpressing endothelial cells with EphB4 antisense oligonucleotides before generating spheroids and assessing sprouting. We observed a significantly attenuated CYP2C9-induced (24 hours) sprout formation in the presence of the EphB4 antisense oligonucleotides (Figure 4B).


Figure 4
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Effect of EphB4 antisense oligonucleotides. EphB4 expression (A) and endothelial cell sprouting (B) assessed in endothelial cells infected with either control (CTL) or CYP2C9 adenoviruses and transfected with EphB4 antisense (As) or scrambled (Scr) oligonucleotides. The bar graphs summarize data obtained in 3 to 10 independent experiments; **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 vs CTL.

Inhibition of 11,12-EET-Induced Angiogenesis In Vivo by EphB4 siRNA
To confirm the importance of EphB4 in CYP2C9-induced angiogenesis in vivo, we assessed the effect of including siRNA directed against murine EphB4 in solvent or 11,12-EET-impregnated Matrigel plugs.

As observed before in human umbilical vein endothelial cells, the overexpression of CYP2C9 in murine lung endothelial cells increase the expression of EphB4 (Figure 5). We then determined the ability of a control siRNA (GFP) and 3 different EphB4 siRNAs to downregulate murine endothelial EphB4 expression. Two of the siRNA tested (siRNA1 and siRNA2) prevented at least the CYP2C9-induced increase in EphB4 expression but only 1 of them (siRNA1) also decreased basal levels of the protein.


Figure 5
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. siRNA-mediated downregulation of EphB4 in murine endothelial cells. Mouse lung endothelial cells were infected with either control (CTL) or CYP2C9 (2C9) adenoviruses and transfected with 3 different siRNAs directed against EphB4. The bar graph summarizes data obtained in 3 independent experiments; *P<0.05 vs CTL.

Matrigel plugs impregnated with either solvent or 11,12-EET together with either a control siRNA (GFP) or the siRNA1 characterized above were then implanted in mice for a total of 7 days. Whereas PECAM-1–positive cells could be detected in plugs treated with solvent, PECAM and β-actin positive vessels were detected in plugs impregnated with 11,12-EET (Figure 6A). These plugs were also blood perfused as they contained measurable levels of hemoglobin (Figure 6B). There was no evidence of blood perfusion of the plugs containing either the CTL nor the EphB4 siRNA in the absence of 11,12-EET (supplemental Figure III). However, the inclusion of EphB4 siRNA1 in the Matrigel plugs completely prevented 11,12-EET-stimulated formation of PECAM-1– and β-actin–expressing vessels and the accumulation of hemoglobin. As expected, the siRNA directed against EphB4 also attenuated the number of PECAM-1–positive cells detected in Matrigel impregnated with bFGF (supplemental Figure III).


Figure 6
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6. Effect of downregulating EphB4 on angiogenesis in vivo. A, PECAM-1 (red) and {alpha}-actin (green) labeled cells in Matrigel plugs containing solvent (Sol) or 11,12-EET together with either a control siRNA or EphB4 siRNA1. B, General appearance and hemoglobin (Hb) content of 11,12-EET-impregnated Matrigel plugs also containing either the CTL or EphB4 siRNA. The bar graphs summarize data from 3 to 4 animals per group; *P<0.05, **P<0.01 vs CTL siRNA-containing plugs.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The results of the present investigation indicate that the overexpression of CYP2C9 as well as the direct application of 11,12-EET increases EphB4 mRNA and protein expression in human and murine endothelial cells. Moreover, the increase in EphB4 seems to be essential for the initiation of CYP epoxygenase/EET-induced angiogenesis as endothelial cell sprouting and the formation of vessels in Matrigel in vivo were prevented by the downregulation (antisense oligonucleotides and siRNA) of EphB4.

Our findings suggest that cytochrome P450-derived EETs play an important role regulating the expression of key molecules involved in angiogenesis and vascular development. However, the role of CYP epoxygenase-derived EETs may have gone largely unnoticed because of the lack of readily available selective tools to activate and inhibit the different enzymes. There are in addition other more basic considerations such as the fragility of CYP expression in some cultured endothelial cells as although CYP epoxygenases are expressed in native endothelial cells, their expression can decrease rapidly after cell isolation.25 This means that the majority of the in vitro assays of endothelial cell sprouting and angiogenesis have been determined in cells that express little or no CYP epoxygenase. Rather intriguingly, EET-induced angiogenesis has been observed when CYP levels are elevated in endothelial cells (either as the result of overexpression of a CYP epoxygenase,7,26 its induction by stimuli such as cyclic strain and hypoxia19,27), or when the EETs are derived from an extraendothelial source (such as EET-generating astrocytes,28,29 an EET-impregnated methylcellulose disk7 or CYP overexpressing tumor cells26,30). This implies that both intra- and extracellular sources of EETs are involved in angiogenesis. The molecular mechanisms by which EETs can stimulate such cellular responses are unclear, and although EET-specific binding sites have been reported on rat aortic smooth muscle cells31 and guinea pig monocytes,32 a specific EET receptor has yet to be identified. EETs can, however, affect several angiogenic signaling cascades.5 One EET-activated pathway clearly linked to angiogenesis is the transactivation of the EGF receptor6,7 which leads in turn to the activation of the serine threonine kinase Akt and an enhanced expression of cyclin D1.7,33,34 The activation of Akt by EETs also induces the phosphorylation, and therefore inhibition of the forkhead factors FoxO1 and FoxO3a and subsequently a decrease in the expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27kip1.9 The results of the present study indicate that CYP2C9 overexpression and the addition of exogenous 11,12-EET increase the expression of EphB4 in cultured human and murine endothelial cells and that the signaling cascade activated involves PI 3-K and Akt.

Signaling by the EphB4 receptor and its ligand ephrinB2 plays an important role in vascular development during embryogenesis.10 Although the exact consequences of Eph-ephrin interactions and forward and reverse signaling on endothelial cell function in adult animals are not clear, it has been proposed that the Eph-ephrin signals are likely to play a role in the spatial organization of developing/remodeling vasculature.35 The results of our investigation, however, indicate that EphB4 is essential for 11,12-EET-induced sprouting angiogenesis. Indeed, preventing the CYP2C9-induced upregulation of EphB4 markedly attenuated endothelial cell sprouting in a modified spheroid assay. Although a role for EphB4 in endothelial migration and tube formation has been proposed by others,21,36 these findings are somewhat controversial as EphB4 is classed as a negative regulator of blood vessel branching and vascular network formation, and is generally accepted to switch the vascularization program from sprouting angiogenesis to circumferential vessel growth.37 This implies that large vessels with few branches would be expected to form in vessels expressing EphB4.

Classically, ephrinB2 was thought to be expressed in arterial endothelial cells whereas EphB4 was restricted to venous endothelial cells.11,12 However, this no longer appears to be strictly the case, and although the arterial expression of ephrinB2 has been confirmed in many different models,12 EphB4 expression has also been detected in arterial endothelial cells.38,39 Moreover, EphB4 expression has been detected in remodeling rat mesenteric microvessels and particularly in capillary sprouts.14 In the present study, we also found atypical EphB4 expression and observed the strongest EET-induced expression of EphB4 in isolated murine mesenteric arteries, even though there was no detectable expression of the protein in the endothelium of freshly isolated vessels. In contrast, EphB4 was abundantly expressed in mesenteric venous endothelial cells but was not upregulated by EET treatment. We also observed that the vessels that formed within Matrigel plugs impregnated with 11,12-EET expressed EphB4, and that endothelial cell infiltration into Matrigel was prevented by its downregulation. Thus, EphB4 may also be implicated in capillary sprouting in specific situations, such as angiogenesis associated with inflammation eg, in the mouse ear (T. Korff, unpublished data, 2007).

Although we have previously reported that CYP epoxygenase-derived EETs can initiate angiogenesis,7,19 the results of the present investigation indicate that 11,12-EET also stimulates vessel maturation as the vessels detected in EET-impregnated Matrigel were coated with {alpha}-actin expressing cells. Given that EphB4 reduces the permeability of the tumor vasculature via activation of the angiopoietin-1/Tie2 system at the endothelium/pericyte interface,37 it is certainly tempting to speculate that the induction of EphB4 at least partly contributes to pericyte recruitment to endothelial cell tubes in plugs containing 11,12-EET.


*    Acknowledgments
 
The authors are indebted to Isabel Winter for expert technical assistance.

Sources of Funding

This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB-TR 23, A6, B5, & C5 and Exzellenzcluster 147 "Cardio-Pulmonary Systems") as well as by the European Vascular Genomics Network a Network of Excellence supported by the European Community’s sixth Framework Program (Contract No. LSHM-CT-2003-503254).

Disclosures

None.


*    Footnotes
 
{dagger}Deceased. Back

Original received December 17, 2007; final version accepted March 4, 2008.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Larsen BT, Campbell WB, Gutterman DD. Beyond vasodilatation: non-vasomotor roles of epoxyeicosatrienoic acids in the cardiovascular system. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2007; 28: 32–38.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Spector AA, Norris AW. Action of epoxyeicosatrienoic acids on cellular function. Am J Physiol Cell Physiology. 2007; 292: C996–C1012.

3. Campbell WB, Gebremedhin D, Pratt PF, Harder DR. Identification of epoxyeicosatrienoic acids as endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factors. Circ Res. 1996; 78: 415–423.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Fisslthaler B, Popp R, Kiss L, Potente M, Harder DR, Fleming I, Busse R. Cytochrome P450 2C is an EDHF synthase in coronary arteries. Nature. 1999; 401: 493–497.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Michaelis UR, Fleming I. From endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF) to angiogenesis: epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs) and cell signaling. Pharmacol Ther. 2006; 111: 584–595.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Chen J-K, Capdevila J, Harris RC. Heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor mediates the biological effects of P450 arachidonate epoxygenase metabolites in epithelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99: 6029–6034.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Michaelis UR, Fisslthaler B, Medhora M, Harder D, Fleming I, Busse R. Cytochrome P450 2C9-derived epoxyeicosatrienoic acids induce angiogenesis via cross-talk with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). FASEB J. 2003; 17: 770–772.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Potente M, Michaelis UR, Fisslthaler B, Busse R, Fleming I. Cytochrome P450 2C9-induced endothelial cell proliferation involves induction of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase phosphatase-1, inhibition of the c-Jun N-terminal kinase, and up-regulation of cyclin D1. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277: 15671–15676.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Potente M, Fisslthaler B, Busse R, Fleming I. 11,12-Epoxyeicosatrienoic acid-induced inhibition of FOXO factors promotes endothelial proliferation by down-regulating p27Kip1. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278: 29619–29625.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Kuijper S, Turner CJ, Adams RH. Regulation of angiogenesis by Eph-ephrin interactions. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2007; 17: 145–151.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Gerety SS, Wang HU, Chen ZF, Anderson DJ. Symmetrical mutant phenotypes of the receptor EphB4 and its specific transmembrane ligand ephrin-B2 in cardiovascular development. Mol Cell. 1999; 4: 403–414.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Shin D, Garcia-Cardena G, Hayashi S, Gerety S, Asahara T, Stavrakis G, Isner J, Folkman J, Gimbrone MA Jr, Anderson DJ. Expression of ephrinB2 identifies a stable genetic difference between arterial and venous vascular smooth muscle as well as endothelial cells, and marks subsets of microvessels at sites of adult neovascularization. Dev Biol. 2001; 230: 139–150.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Kojima T, Chung TY, Chang JH, Sayegh R, Casanova FH, Azar DT. Comparison of EphA receptor tyrosine kinases and ephrinA ligand expression to EphB-ephrinB in vascularized corneas. Cornea. 2007; 26: 569–578.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Taylor AC, Murfee WL, Peirce SM. EphB4 expression along adult rat microvascular networks: EphB4 is more than a venous specific marker. Microcirculation. 2007; 14: 253–267.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Gauthier KM, Deeter C, Krishna UM, Reddy YK, Bondlela M, Falck JR, Campbell WB. 14,15-Epoxyeicosa-5(Z)-enoic acid: a selective epoxyeicosatrienoic acid antagonist that inhibits endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization and relaxation in coronary arteries. Circ Res. 2002; 90: 1028–1036.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Busse R, Lamontagne D. Endothelium-derived bradykinin is responsible for the increase in calcium produced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in human endothelial cells. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1991; 344: 126–129.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Popp R, Bauersachs J, Hecker M, Fleming I, Busse R. A transferable, β-naphthoflavone-inducible, hyperpolarizing factor is synthesized by native and cultured porcine coronary endothelial cells. J Physiol (Lond). 1996; 497: 699–709.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Fleming I, Fisslthaler B, Dixit M, Busse R. Role of PECAM-1 in the shear-stress-induced activation of Akt and the endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) in endothelial cells. J Cell Sci. 2005; 118: 4103–4111.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Michaelis UR, Fisslthaler B, Barbosa-Sicard E, Falck JR, Fleming I, Busse R. Cytochrome P450 epoxygenases 2C8 and 2C9 are implicated in hypoxia-induced endothelial cell migration and angiogenesis. J Cell Sci. 2005; 118: 5489–5498.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Xia G, Kumar SR, Masood R, Koss M, Templeman C, Quinn D, Zhu S, Reddy R, Krasnoperov V, Gill PS. Up-regulation of EphB4 in mesothelioma and its biological significance. Clin Cancer Res. 2005; 11: 4305–4315.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Bruhl T, Urbich C, Aicher D, cker-Palmer A, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Homeobox A9 transcriptionally regulates the EphB4 receptor to modulate endothelial cell migration and tube formation. Circ Res. 2004; 94: 743–751.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Korff T, Dandekar G, Pfaff D, Fuller T, Goettsch W, Morawietz H, Schaffner F, Augustin HG. Endothelial ephrinB2 is controlled by microenvironmental determinants and associates context-dependently with CD31. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006; 26: 468–474.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Korff T, Augustin HG. Tensional forces in fibrillar extracellular matrices control directional capillary sprouting. J Cell Sci. 1999; 112: 3249–3258.[Abstract]

24. Wang HU, Chen ZF, Anderson DJ. Molecular distinction and angiogenic interaction between embryonic arteries and veins revealed by ephrin-B2 and its receptor Eph-B4. Cell. 1998; 93: 741–753.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Fisslthaler B, Hinsch N, Chataigneau T, Popp R, Kiss L, Busse R, Fleming I. Nifedipine increases cytochrome P4502C expression and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor-mediated responses in coronary arteries. Hypertension. 2000; 36: 270–275.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Medhora M, Daniels J, Mundey K, Fisslthaler B, Busse R, Jacobs ER, Harder DR. Epoxygenase-driven angiogenesis in human lung microvascular endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 2003; 284: H215–H224.

27. Michaelis UR, Falck JR, Schmidt R, Busse R, Fleming I. Cytochrome P4502C9-derived epoxyeicosatrienoic acids induce the expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in endothelial cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005; 25: 321–326.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Munzenmaier DH, Harder DR. Cerebral microvascular endothelial cell tube formation: role of astrocytic epoxyeicosatrienoic acid release. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000; 278: H1163–H1167.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Zhang B, Cao H, Rao GN. Fibroblast growth factor-2 is a downstream mediator of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-Akt signaling in 14,15-epoxyeicosatrienoic acid-induced angiogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2006; 281: 905–914.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Jiang JG, Chen CL, Card JW, Yang S, Chen JX, Fu XN, Ning YG, Xiao X, Zeldin DC, Wang DW. Cytochrome P450 2J2 promotes the neoplastic phenotype of carcinoma cells and is up-regulated in human tumors. Cancer Res. 2005; 65: 4707–4715.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Wong PY, Lai PS, Falck JR. Mechanism and signal transduction of 14 (R), 15 (S)-epoxyeicosatrienoic acid (14,15-EET) binding in guinea pig monocytes. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2000; 62: 321–333.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Snyder GD, Krishna UM, Falck JR, Spector AA. Evidence for a membrane site of action for 14,15-EET on expression of aromatase in vascular smooth muscle. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002; 283: H1936–H1942.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Chen JK, Capdevila J, Harris RC. Cytochrome P450 epoxygenase metabolism of arachidonic acid inhibits apoptosis. Mol Cell Biol. 2001; 21: 6322–6331.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Fleming I, Fisslthaler B, Michaelis UR, Kiss L, Popp R, Busse R. The coronary endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF) stimulates multiple signalling pathways and proliferation in vascular cells. Pflugers Arch. 2001; 442: 511–518.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

35. Füller T, Korff T, Kilian A, Dandekar G, Augustin HG. Forward EphB4 signaling in endothelial cells controls cellular repulsion and segregation from ephrinB2 positive cells. J Cell Sci. 2003; 116: 2461–2470.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Salvucci O, De La Luz SM, Martina JA, McCormick PJ, Tosato G. EphB2 and EphB4 receptors forward signaling promotes SDF-1-induced endothelial cell chemotaxis and branching remodeling. Blood. 2006; 108: 2914–2922.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Erber R, Eichelsbacher U, Powajbo V, Korn T, Djonov V, Lin J, Hammes HP, Grobholz R, Ullrich A, Vajkoczy P. EphB4 controls blood vascular morphogenesis during postnatal angiogenesis. EMBO J. 2006; 25: 628–641.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

38. Hall SM, Hislop AA, Haworth SG. Origin, differentiation, and maturation of human pulmonary veins. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2002; 26: 333–340.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Diehl S, Bruno R, Wilkinson GA, Loose DA, Wilting J, Schweigerer L, Klein R. Altered expression patterns of EphrinB2 and EphB2 in human umbilical vessels and congenital venous malformations. Pediatr Res. 2005; 57: 537–544.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
A. A. Spector
Arachidonic acid cytochrome P450 epoxygenase pathway
J. Lipid Res., April 1, 2009; 50(Supplement): S52 - S56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
Y. Tang, E. A. Scheef, S. Wang, C. M. Sorenson, C. B. Marcus, C. R. Jefcoate, and N. Sheibani
CYP1B1 expression promotes the proangiogenic phenotype of endothelium through decreased intracellular oxidative stress and thrombospondin-2 expression
Blood, January 15, 2009; 113(3): 744 - 754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/6/1123    most recent
ATVBAHA.107.161190v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Webler, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Webler, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, I.