Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2008;28:812-819
Published online before print February 14, 2008, doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.159327
Free Article
This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/5/812    most recent
ATVBAHA.107.159327v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doran, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by McNamara, C. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doran, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by McNamara, C. A.
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2008;28:812.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Brief Review

Role of Smooth Muscle Cells in the Initiation and Early Progression of Atherosclerosis

Amanda C. Doran; Nahum Meller; Coleen A. McNamara

From the Cardiovascular Division/Department of Medicine, the Cardiovascular Research Center, and Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville.

Correspondence to Coleen A. McNamara, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Cardiovascular Division, PO Box 801394, Charlottesville, VA 22908. E-mail cam8c{at}virginia.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowIntimal SMCs: Harbingers of...
down arrowPhenotype of SMCs Within...
down arrowLipid Uptake by SMCs
down arrowRetention of Monocytes and...
down arrowAntiapoptotic Effect of SMCs...
down arrowCytokine Production by Smooth...
down arrowExtracellular Matrix Production...
down arrowSMCs: Guilt by Association...
down arrowReferences
 
The initiation of atherosclerosis results from complex interactions of circulating factors and various cell types in the vessel wall, including endothelial cells, lymphocytes, monocytes, and smooth muscle cells (SMCs). Recent reviews highlight the role of activated endothelium and inflammatory cell recruitment in the initiation of and progression of early atherosclerosis. Yet, human autopsy studies, in vitro mechanistic studies, and in vivo correlative data suggest an important role for SMCs in the initiation of atherosclerosis. SMCs are the major producers of extracellular matrix within the vessel wall and in response to atherogenic stimuli can modify the type of matrix proteins produced. In turn, the type of matrix present can affect the lipid content of the developing plaque and the proliferative index of the cells that are adherent to it. SMCs are also capable of functions typically attributed to other cell types. Like macrophages, SMCs can express a variety of receptors for lipid uptake and can form foam-like cells, thereby participating in the early accumulation of plaque lipid. Like endothelial cells, SMCs can also express a variety of adhesion molecules such as vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 to which monocytes and lymphocytes can adhere and migrate into the vessel wall. In addition, through these adhesion molecules, SMCs can also stabilize these cells against apoptosis, thus contributing to the early cellularity of the lesion. Like many cells within the developing plaque, SMCs also produce many cytokines such as PDGF, transforming growth factor-β, IFN{gamma}, and MCP-1, all of which contribute to the initiation and propagation of the inflammatory response to lipid. Recent advances in SMC-specific gene modulation have enhanced our ability to determine the role of SMCs in early atherogenesis.

Smooth muscle cells (SMCs) play a key role in fibrous cap formation and plaque stability in advanced atherosclerosis; however, less is known about the role of SMCs in the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis. This review summarizes the present data implicating SMCs in the development of early atherogenesis.


Key Words: atherosclerosis • smooth muscle cells • intimal thickening


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowIntimal SMCs: Harbingers of...
down arrowPhenotype of SMCs Within...
down arrowLipid Uptake by SMCs
down arrowRetention of Monocytes and...
down arrowAntiapoptotic Effect of SMCs...
down arrowCytokine Production by Smooth...
down arrowExtracellular Matrix Production...
down arrowSMCs: Guilt by Association...
down arrowReferences
 
Understanding the molecular and cellular mechanisms that lead to the development of atherosclerosis is critical for identifying strategies to limit disease progression before it leads to clinical consequences. Studies have revealed that many different cell types, including macrophages, lymphocytes, endothelial cells, and smooth muscle cells (SMCs), are involved in atherosclerotic lesion formation.1 Most reviews on atherosclerosis focus on the role of endothelial and inflammatory cells in the initiation of atherosclerosis and discuss SMCs largely in the context of late atherosclerosis when they migrate into the neointima and secrete matrix proteins to stabilize the plaque.1–6 Histological studies of autopsy specimens of human coronary arteries ranging from infants to adults provide evidence that regions prone to the development of atherosclerosis contain abundant SMCs whereas regions that are more resistant to atherosclerosis contain few,7–9 raising the interesting question: Do SMCs in areas of intimal thickening play a pathogenic role in the increased development of atherosclerosis at these sites? The potential role of SMCs in early lesion initiation has not been extensively reviewed. This article reviews existing in vitro and in vivo data implicating a role for SMCs in early atherogenesis. Although many of the mechanisms discussed herein may be involved not only in early atherosclerosis but also at later stages, we will focus on the role SMCs play in the development of early stage I through III lesions, before the formation of stage IV "atheroma" (see Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. American Heart Association Classification of Atherosclerotic Lesions7–9,15


*    Intimal SMCs: Harbingers of Lesion Development?
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Intimal SMCs: Harbingers of...
down arrowPhenotype of SMCs Within...
down arrowLipid Uptake by SMCs
down arrowRetention of Monocytes and...
down arrowAntiapoptotic Effect of SMCs...
down arrowCytokine Production by Smooth...
down arrowExtracellular Matrix Production...
down arrowSMCs: Guilt by Association...
down arrowReferences
 
Although the majority of SMCs in the vessel wall of humans are contained within the medial layer, a significant number of SMCs exist within the intima as well. These areas, known as "intimal thickenings" can be either "eccentric" or "diffuse", although these 2 types are often contiguous and can be difficult to distinguish from each other. Eccentric intimal thickenings tend to be focal and involve up to half of the circumference of the arterial wall.7 They are found in conserved locations, including branchpoints and areas of turbulent blood flow.7,10–13 Eccentric intimal thickenings have been identified as early as 36 weeks’ gestation and are present in nearly all humans by 1 year of age.7,13,14 Most interestingly, regions of eccentric intimal thickening correlate with the locations in which advanced atherosclerotic lesions are later observed.7,15 Unlike eccentric thickenings, diffuse intimal thickenings occur throughout the vasculature, particularly in older patients, suggesting that it may be part of the normal aging process.7,10,12,16,17 Both types of intimal thickening consist almost exclusively of SMCs and the proteoglycans that they produce.7 Investigation into the character of the SMCs within these thickenings suggest that within a particular area, the SMCs present are of a monoclonal nature, whereas the SMCs within the underlying media are polyclonal.14,18 These monoclonal regions could result from any one of several scenarios, including: somatic mutation resulting in a neoplastic-type proliferation, selection of a rare cell that proliferates in response to a particular stimulus, or the migration and trapping of rare cells during development.19 These topics have been concisely reviewed in 2 articles by Schwartz et al.16,19 Although the migration and trapping hypothesis is widely favored, definitive evidence confirming this is lacking. Progress in this area, as with all atherosclerosis research, has been hindered by the lack of an ideal animal model. It is important to note that not all animal models of atherosclerosis develop intimal thickening as a precursor to lesion formation. While intimal thickening is observed in primate and chicken models, it is not found in any of the commonly used rodent models.7 Many investigators over the years have attempted to study atherosclerosis in rodent models by injuring vessels and disrupting the internal elastic lamina, thus producing a robust proliferation of SMCs from the media. Although many reports in the literature use this strategy, the plaques that result from this injury model differ significantly from spontaneous atherosclerosis in cellular content. Because of this, we will attempt to limit our review to those articles which do not rely solely on the injury model. Independent of how intimal thickenings arise, the effect of the presence of intimal SMCs on the subsequent development of atherosclerosis remains an interesting question.


*    Phenotype of SMCs Within Atherosclerotic Lesions
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowIntimal SMCs: Harbingers of...
*Phenotype of SMCs Within...
down arrowLipid Uptake by SMCs
down arrowRetention of Monocytes and...
down arrowAntiapoptotic Effect of SMCs...
down arrowCytokine Production by Smooth...
down arrowExtracellular Matrix Production...
down arrowSMCs: Guilt by Association...
down arrowReferences
 
Present evidence suggests that intimal SMCs differ significantly from medial SMCs and as such may have unique atherogenic properties that make them fertile ground for the initiation of plaques.20 Whereas human medial SMCs predominantly express proteins involved in the contractile function of the cell such as smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SM-MHC) or smooth muscle {alpha}-actin (SM-{alpha}A), those SMCs found in the intima express lower levels of these proteins, have a higher proliferative index, and have a greater synthetic capacity for extracellular matrix, proteases, and cytokines.6,21,22 Follow on studies, predominantly in vitro, have gone on to show that rat and mouse SMCs can switch between the "contractile" and "synthetic" phenotypic states in response to a variety of atherogenic stimuli including extracellular matrix,23,24 cytokines,25–27 shear stress,28 reactive oxygen species,29 and lipids.30 In addition, this "phenotypic switching" correlates with the ability of SMCs to perform a variety of functions. These "synthetic" SMCs migrate and proliferate more readily than "contractile" SMCs and can synthesize up to 25 to 46 times more collagen.6,31 In addition, they express a greater proportion of VLDL, LDL, and scavenger receptors allowing more efficient lipid uptake and foam cell formation.21,32 Therefore, transition to the "synthetic" state facilitates many of the pathogenic roles of SMCs. Recently, an in vivo study confirmed the ability of lipids to induce phenotypic switching of SMCs.30 Using a pluronic gel system, the authors demonstrated that local exposure of rat carotid arteries to the oxidized phospholipid 1-palmytoyl-2-(5-oxovaleroyl)-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POVPC) caused SMCs to downregulate SM-{alpha}A and SM-MHC.


*    Lipid Uptake by SMCs
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowIntimal SMCs: Harbingers of...
up arrowPhenotype of SMCs Within...
*Lipid Uptake by SMCs
down arrowRetention of Monocytes and...
down arrowAntiapoptotic Effect of SMCs...
down arrowCytokine Production by Smooth...
down arrowExtracellular Matrix Production...
down arrowSMCs: Guilt by Association...
down arrowReferences
 
Although the majority of foam cells in the atherosclerotic lesion are thought to be derived from macrophages, SMCs also give rise to a significant number of lipid laden cells.9 This phenomenon has been established by colocalization studies in vitro and in vivo by demonstrating simultaneous staining for smooth muscle markers and lipids.32–35

Smooth muscle cells from humans, rats, and rabbits have been demonstrated to express a variety of cholesterol uptake receptors, including the LDL receptor,36 VLDL receptor,37 CD36,38,39 type I and type II scavenger receptors,39,40 and CXCL16/SR-PSOX.41 In diet-induced models of atherosclerosis, SMCs derived from rabbits fed a Western diet were shown to have increased levels of scavenger receptor.42 Similarly, in the presence of atherogenic cytokines including interleukin (IL)-1β, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-{alpha}, and macrophage colony stimulating factor (MCSF), the expression of LDL and VLDL receptors is increased in rats and rabbits.36,37,41,43 In addition to enhancing expression of the LDL receptor, TNF{alpha} and MCSF also increase the binding of LDL to SMCs, therefore promoting foam cell formation.43 Cholesterol uptake studies have confirmed that these receptors are indeed functional and in the presence of various forms of cholesterol, SMCs can become "lipid laden."32 In vitro, the LDL receptor on SMCs can mediate the uptake of unmodified LDL,36 acetylated LDL,44 enzymatically modified LDL,35 as well as chylomicron remnants45–47 in the same manner demonstrated in macrophages. The scavenger receptor CXCL16/SR-PSOX, which is found in atherosclerotic but not healthy vessels, is also associated with the uptake of oxidized LDL into human SMCs.41

In addition to cholesterol uptake, smooth muscle cells also express the necessary components of the reverse cholesterol transport pathway, including the ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporter, ABCA1.48 The reverse transport pathway, extensively studied in macrophages, is the means by which lipid laden cells can metabolize lipid and export it to carriers that recycle it to the liver. In macrophages, these cellular transporters are downregulated as atherosclerosis progresses, leading to foam cell formation. After initial cholesterol loading, mouse SMCs upregulate ABCA1 and ABCG1 while downregulating the typical smooth muscle markers including smooth muscle {alpha}-actin, {alpha}-tropomyosin, and myosin heavy chain.32 With continued lipid loading in a proatherogenic milieu, these SMCs go on to downregulate the levels of the cholesterol transporters, enhancing foam cell formation.48 These data suggest that lipid accumulation in SMCs may contribute to atherosclerosis development.


*    Retention of Monocytes and Macrophages by SMCs
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowIntimal SMCs: Harbingers of...
up arrowPhenotype of SMCs Within...
up arrowLipid Uptake by SMCs
*Retention of Monocytes and...
down arrowAntiapoptotic Effect of SMCs...
down arrowCytokine Production by Smooth...
down arrowExtracellular Matrix Production...
down arrowSMCs: Guilt by Association...
down arrowReferences
 
Interaction of monocytes with cells of the vascular wall allows these cells to move from the bloodstream into the intima where they differentiate into macrophages. Although endothelial cells are thought to be the major cell type responsible for interacting with macrophages, SMCs are also capable of doing so. Electron microscopic and immunohistochemical analysis of human atherosclerotic plaques have shown that SMCs and macrophages are in direct contact.9 This process is mediated by the expression of a variety of adhesion molecules on endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells, including intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), and fractalkine (CX3CL1).

VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 have been well characterized on endothelium as adhesion molecules that are induced in response to inflammatory cytokines and enable endothelial cell:monocyte as well as endothelial cell:lymphocyte interactions.49 The expression of VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 has also been detected on human smooth muscle cells, indicating that they are capable of interacting with leukocytes by this mechanism.50 This fact, taken together with their colocalization with monocytes within the intima, suggest that smooth muscle cells could play an important role in retaining monocytes and macrophages within the lesion.51,52

VCAM-1 has been shown to be expressed by intimal smooth muscle cells within the atherosclerotic coronaries, aorta, and carotids of both mice and humans, but is not found in healthy medial SMCs.53,54 In addition, the presence of VCAM-1 has been detected on smooth muscle cells within lesion prone areas of the aorta of ApoE–/– mice, suggesting that this event occurs early in atherogenesis.50 In fact, expression of VCAM-1 in medial SMCs was found to occur before or coincident with mononuclear cell infiltration, providing further support for this idea.50 Like VCAM-1, ICAM-1 is also expressed by SMCs in the intima of lesions, but is not found in healthy aorta. Its expression is confined to areas prone to lesion formation and is upregulated before mononuclear infiltration.55

Fractalkine (CX3CL1) is a ligand for the chemokine receptor CX3CR1 that is expressed on human smooth muscle cells but unlike ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 is not expressed on endothelial cells.56 In the presence of oxidized lipids, human monocytes upregulate expression of CX3CR1, enabling them to bind to SMCs and accumulate in the vessel wall under hyperlipidemic conditions.57 Likewise, SMCs in healthy regions of arteries do not express fractalkine, however it is significantly upregulated on those found in regions of atherosclerotic plaque.58 In vitro, monocyte adhesion to mouse SMCs can be inhibited by blocking fractalkine on SMCs prior to incubation with monocytes and in vivo, CX3CR1–/– ApoE–/– mice have reduced monocyte accumulation within lesions.58


*    Antiapoptotic Effect of SMCs on Monocytes and Macrophages
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowIntimal SMCs: Harbingers of...
up arrowPhenotype of SMCs Within...
up arrowLipid Uptake by SMCs
up arrowRetention of Monocytes and...
*Antiapoptotic Effect of SMCs...
down arrowCytokine Production by Smooth...
down arrowExtracellular Matrix Production...
down arrowSMCs: Guilt by Association...
down arrowReferences
 
In addition to being able to bind and retain monocytes within the developing atherosclerotic lesion, SMCs are also able to protect them from apoptosis. One group observed that very few apoptotic monocytes were found in early atherosclerotic lesions when SMCs are abundant, leading them to propose that local interactions between these 2 cell types may protect the monocytes.59 This potential antiapoptotic phenomenon could be part of the mechanism of monocyte accumulation in early atherosclerosis after migration to the subendothelial layer.51,52,59 Recent in vitro studies have demonstrated that SMCs can in fact protect monocytes from apoptosis. Serum-deprived peripheral blood monocytes rapidly undergo apoptosis, but when cocultured with human SMCs, the monocytes survive.51 This effect was found to be mediated by an increase in Bcl-2 expression and increased activity of the Akt and MAPK pathways. Furthermore, the effect was blocked by a neutralizing antibody to VCAM-1, suggesting that the VCAM-1/VLA4 interaction may be essential.51 In addition, several stimuli, including angiotensin II, PDGF-BB, and 12/15 lipoxygenase activation, were found to increase monocyte binding to SMCs and prevent apoptosis.52


*    Cytokine Production by Smooth Muscle Cells
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowIntimal SMCs: Harbingers of...
up arrowPhenotype of SMCs Within...
up arrowLipid Uptake by SMCs
up arrowRetention of Monocytes and...
up arrowAntiapoptotic Effect of SMCs...
*Cytokine Production by Smooth...
down arrowExtracellular Matrix Production...
down arrowSMCs: Guilt by Association...
down arrowReferences
 
Atherosclerosis is a form of chronic inflammation associated with the secretion of many cytokines, which are produced by T cells, macrophages, endothelial cells, and smooth muscle cells. Smooth muscle cells in particular produce cytokines that attract and activate leukocytes, induce proliferation of SMCs, promote endothelial cell dysfunction, and stimulate production of extracellular matrix components. Although SMCs are capable of producing many cytokines, some of the most important are: platelet derived growth factor (PDGF), TGF-β, macrophage inhibitory factor (MIF), interferon gamma (IFN{gamma}), and monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP-1). All of these cytokines can also be produced by other cells within the lesion, therefore although a role for SMC production of these cytokines seems probable, their precise contribution remains unknown (Table 2). Recently, an excellent review by Raines et al detailed many of the cytokines produced by SMCs under atherogenic conditions.60


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Atherogenic Cytokines Elaborated by Smooth Muscle Cells


*    Extracellular Matrix Production by Smooth Muscle Cells
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowIntimal SMCs: Harbingers of...
up arrowPhenotype of SMCs Within...
up arrowLipid Uptake by SMCs
up arrowRetention of Monocytes and...
up arrowAntiapoptotic Effect of SMCs...
up arrowCytokine Production by Smooth...
*Extracellular Matrix Production...
down arrowSMCs: Guilt by Association...
down arrowReferences
 
One of the major roles of smooth muscle cells is to produce extracellular matrix, which accumulates over the course of lesion progression.3,61 Although endothelial cells, macrophages, and smooth muscle cells all contribute to ECM production, SMCs are known to be the major producers of connective tissue both in the healthy and atherosclerotic vessel.2 Whereas most of the ECM within a healthy artery is type I and type III fibrillar collagen, atherosclerotic lesions tend to contain mostly proteoglycans with scattered type I collagen fibrils and fibronectin.43 This transition can alter not only the architecture of the vessel, but also the lipid content and the proliferative index.

ECM within the developing lesion of humans, monkeys, and rodents can trap and retain lipoproteins.62 As atherosclerosis progresses, the presence of many atherogenic cytokines stimulate SMCs to favor the production of proteoglycans and fibronectin as well as enhance the rate of ECM synthesis.60 Once present in the vessel wall, proteoglycans entrap additional LDL via ionic interactions with the LDL core proteins, ApoB100 and ApoE. When bound, LDL can be quickly oxidized, enhancing lipid uptake by macrophages and foam cell formation.63,64 OxLDL, in turn, stimulates SMCs to secrete larger and more highly sulfated proteoglycans, which increases their affinity for LDL.64,65 Therefore, alterations in SMC production of ECM can increase lipid content and accelerate lesion progression.

ECM content can in turn influence the cellularity of the lesion. When SMCs are bound to healthy fibrillar collagen or laminin, they quickly become arrested in G1. This cell cycle arrest was found to be concomitant with SMC upregulation of cdk2 inhibitors and subsequent phosphorylation of these proteins by cyclin E associated kinase in rodents and primates.66,67 In contrast, when SMCs are bound to fibronectin and proteoglycan as in an atherosclerotic plaque, cdk2 inhibitors such as p27kip1 are downregulated to promote SMC proliferation.66–69 In turn, proliferating SMCs produce more proteoglycan than quiescent cells, amplifying the effect.64,70,71


*    SMCs: Guilt by Association or Truly Guilty?
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowIntimal SMCs: Harbingers of...
up arrowPhenotype of SMCs Within...
up arrowLipid Uptake by SMCs
up arrowRetention of Monocytes and...
up arrowAntiapoptotic Effect of SMCs...
up arrowCytokine Production by Smooth...
up arrowExtracellular Matrix Production...
*SMCs: Guilt by Association...
down arrowReferences
 
Specific regions of the vascular tree are more susceptible to the development of atherosclerosis than others, and these regions are found to have abundant SMCs in the intima. In vitro mechanistic and in vivo correlative data provide evidence that these phenotypically modulated SMCs participate in functions that can lead to atherogenesis as outlined above. While these data suggest a key role for SMCs in the initiation and early progression of atherosclerosis, mechanistic in vivo data confirming the role of SMCs in these processes are just recently surfacing. These studies have been hindered by the fact that lesions are complex and many SMC functions that would lead to atherosclerosis initiation and progression are redundant with other cell types that participate in early lesion development. More definitive studies involving the depletion of a specific cell type, as has been done with specific inflammatory cell populations to confirm their role in atherosclerosis, are not feasible for SMCs because any such mutation would be lethal in embryonic stages. Recent in vivo studies using SMC-specific gene modulation in mice have provided some insights into the role of SMCs in vascular pathologies. SMC-specific knockout of connexin43 results in an increased neointimal response to injury.72 SMC-specific overexpression of genes involved in the production of reactive oxygen species, Nox1, and catalase can alter the hypertrophic and hypertensive response to Angiotensin II.73,74 These data highlight the fact that the use of this technology is feasible for studying the in vivo role of SMC in atherosclerosis. Yet there is still a dearth of literature using these tools to confirm the in vitro mechanistic studies reviewed herein.

Reasons for the relative lack of this in vivo data are explored in more detail in a recent review by Wamhoff et al.75 First, there is no single gene that marks the SMC lineage, making it difficult to select a target promoter to drive cell-specific expression. For example, SM-{alpha}A and smooth muscle 22-{alpha} (SM22{alpha}) are restricted to SMCs in the adult animal, but are expressed in a variety of tissues including cardiomyocytes and skeletal myoblasts during development.6,75 Smooth muscle myosin heavy chain, although more specific than most other markers, is still expressed in some atrial myocytes.76 Such promiscuous expression raises the question of whether the resulting phenotype can be truly attributed to a SMC-specific phenomenon or it is attributable at least in part to effects in other tissues over the course of development. Secondly, as discussed above, SMCs retain a certain degree of plasticity even in the adult animal, altering their expression of cell-specific genes in response to many stimuli. Therefore, overexpression studies using transgenes driven by these SMC-specific promoters could be affected by the pathophysiological state of the animal. Indeed, studies have shown significant variation in expression after vascular injury, which is known to induce phenotypic switching of SMCs.77 This is a significant consideration in the choice of promoter construct for studying SMCs in atherosclerosis, because phenotypic modulation of SMCs within lesions is known to be an early phenomenon.6 Lastly, exogenous Cre recombinase expressed by cells lining the reproductive tract of parent mice can result in high levels of recombination that are not specific to SMCs in their offspring. To date, the reason for this is unproven, although Wamhoff et al have postulated that it may be attributable to transplacental leakage from the SMC-rich uterus.75

To circumvent the problems associated with SMC-specific gene targeting, conditional or inducible gene targeting has been used. Wolfsgruber et al crossed SM22{alpha}-CreERT2(ki) mice with ApoE–/– mice expressing a floxed cGMP-dependent protein kinase. When fed a Western diet, these animals were found to have decreased plaque size attributable to a decrease in cGMP-dependent protein kinase–mediated nitric oxide production.78 Another study by Feil et al bred SM22{alpha}-CreERT2(ki) mice to each other, generating inducible SM22{alpha} knockouts. They found that the lack of SM22{alpha} significantly increased the amount of atherosclerosis in these animals.79 Clarke et al have used SMC promoter technology to induce SMC-specific cell death in atherosclerotic plaques. By placing the human diphtheria toxin receptor under the control of a minimal SM22{alpha} promoter, the authors generated transgenic mice whose vascular SMCs would be susceptible to cell death in the presence of diphtheria toxin. When crossed to the ApoE–/– background and fed a Western diet for 12 weeks, these animals developed advanced atherosclerotic plaques. On subsequent administration of diphtheria toxin to these animals, 50% to 70% of their SMCs underwent apoptosis. Although overall plaque size remained unchanged, the investigators noted that SMC death was enough to induce increased macrophage content, increased necrotic core volume, decreased matrix content, and significant thinning of the fibrous cap.80 No thrombosis, disruption of elastic laminae, or inflammation was detected. Although the study by Clarke is focused on the function of SMCs in late atherosclerosis and plaque stability, it illustrates the feasibility of this type of technique to study SMC-specific function in vivo. In addition, the studies by Wolfsgruber and Feil, which both modified SMC function before the development of atherosclerosis, provide evidence that SMCs may contribute to the earlier stages of atherogenesis and that these types of conditional gene manipulation can be successfully used for the study of SMCs in early disease.

These recent studies, coupled with significant in vitro mechanistic data and in vivo correlative data reviewed herein, provide strong evidence that SMCs are indeed important in early atherogenesis. SMCs are the first cells present in locations destined to develop atherosclerotic plaques. These SMCs, more than medial SMCs, secrete extracellular matrix that traps lipid from the bloodstream and can take up this lipid to form foam-like cells just as macrophages do in more advanced atheroma. SMCs can also enhance the accumulation of monocytes and macrophages within the early lesion by secreting cytokines to attract them from the bloodstream, secreting matrix to which these cells can attach and by direct SMC:monocyte contact that retains and stabilizes these cells. At the same time, these studies also underscore a key role for conditional SMC-specific gene modification in providing further in vivo mechanistic data to confirm these various functions and isolate their role from that of other cell types during the initiation and early progression of atherosclerosis.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Sources of Funding

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants RO1 HL-62522 (to C.A.M.), P01 HL-55798 (to C.A.M.), and by an American Heart Association predoctoral fellowship (to A.C.D.).

Disclosures

None.


*    Footnotes
 
Original received November 14, 2007; final version accepted January 27, 2008.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowIntimal SMCs: Harbingers of...
up arrowPhenotype of SMCs Within...
up arrowLipid Uptake by SMCs
up arrowRetention of Monocytes and...
up arrowAntiapoptotic Effect of SMCs...
up arrowCytokine Production by Smooth...
up arrowExtracellular Matrix Production...
up arrowSMCs: Guilt by Association...
*References
 

  1. Lusis AJ. Atherosclerosis. Nature. 2000; 407: 233–241.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Falk E. Pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47: C7–C12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Geng YJ, Libby P. Progression of atheroma: a struggle between death and procreation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002; 22: 1370–1380.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Gronholdt ML, Dalager-Pedersen S, Falk E. Coronary atherosclerosis: determinants of plaque rupture. Eur Heart J. 1998; 19 Suppl C: C24–C29.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Newby AC, Zaltsman AB. Fibrous cap formation or destruction–the critical importance of vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation, migration and matrix formation. Cardiovasc Res. 1999; 41: 345–360.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Owens GK, Kumar MS, Wamhoff BR. Molecular regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation in development and disease. Physiol Rev. 2004; 84: 767–801.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Stary HC, Blankenhorn DH, Chandler AB, Glagov S, Insull W Jr, Richardson M, Rosenfeld ME, Schaffer SA, Schwartz CJ, Wagner WD, Wissler RW. A definition of the intima of human arteries and of its atherosclerosis-prone regions. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Arterioscler Thromb. 1992; 12: 120–134.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Stary HC, Chandler AB, Dinsmore RE, Fuster V, Glagov S, Insull W Jr, Rosenfeld ME, Schwartz CJ, Wagner WD, Wissler RW. A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1995; 92: 1355–1374.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Stary HC, Chandler AB, Glagov S, Guyton JR, Insull W Jr, Rosenfeld ME, Schaffer SA, Schwartz CJ, Wagner WD, Wissler RW. A definition of initial, fatty streak, and intermediate lesions of atherosclerosis. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994; 14: 840–856.[Abstract]
  10. Velican C, Velican D. Coronary arteries in children up to the age of ten years II. Intimal thickening and its role in atherosclerotic involvement. Med Interne. 1976; 14: 17–24.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Velican C, Velican D. The precursors of coronary atherosclerotic plaques in subjects up to 40 years old. Atherosclerosis. 1980; 37: 33–46.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Velican C, Velican D. Study of coronary intimal thickening. Atherosclerosis. 1985; 56: 331–344.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Weninger WJ, Muller GB, Reiter C, Meng S, Rabl SU. Intimal hyperplasia of the infant parasellar carotid artery: a potential developmental factor in atherosclerosis and SIDS. Circ Res. 1999; 85: 970–975.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Ikari Y, McManus BM, Kenyon J, Schwartz SM. Neonatal intima formation in the human coronary artery. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999; 19: 2036–2040.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Stary HC. Natural history and histological classification of atherosclerotic lesions: an update. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000; 20: 1177–1178.[Free Full Text]
  16. Schwartz SM, Heimark RL, Majesky MW. Developmental mechanisms underlying pathology of arteries. Physiol Rev. 1990; 70: 1177–1209.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Stary HC. Evolution and progression of atherosclerotic lesions in coronary arteries of children and young adults. Arteriosclerosis. 1989; 9: I19–32.
  18. Benditt EP, Benditt JM. Evidence for a monoclonal origin of human atherosclerotic plaques. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973; 70: 1753–1756.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Schwartz SM, Murry CE. Proliferation and the monoclonal origins of atherosclerotic lesions. Annu Rev Med. 1998; 49: 437–460.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Mosse PR, Campbell GR, Wang ZL, Campbell JH. Smooth muscle phenotypic expression in human carotid arteries. I. Comparison of cells from diffuse intimal thickenings adjacent to atheromatous plaques with those of the media. Lab Invest. 1985; 53: 556–562.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Campbell JH, Campbell GR. The role of smooth muscle cells in atherosclerosis. Curr Opin Lipidol. 1994; 5: 323–330.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Worth NF, Rolfe BE, Song J, Campbell GR. Vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypic modulation in culture is associated with reorganisation of contractile and cytoskeletal proteins. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2001; 49: 130–145.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Hedin U, Bottger BA, Luthman J, Johansson S, Thyberg J. A substrate of the cell-attachment sequence of fibronectin (Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser) is sufficient to promote transition of arterial smooth muscle cells from a contractile to a synthetic phenotype. Dev Biol. 1989; 133: 489–501.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Thyberg J, Hultgardh-Nilsson A. Fibronectin and the basement membrane components laminin and collagen type IV influence the phenotypic properties of subcultured rat aortic smooth muscle cells differently. Cell Tissue Res. 1994; 276: 263–271.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Corjay MH, Thompson MM, Lynch KR, Owens GK. Differential effect of platelet-derived growth factor- versus serum-induced growth on smooth muscle alpha-actin and nonmuscle beta-actin mRNA expression in cultured rat aortic smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem. 1989; 264: 10501–10506.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Hautmann MB, Madsen CS, Owens GK. A transforming growth factor beta (TGFbeta) control element drives TGFbeta-induced stimulation of smooth muscle alpha-actin gene expression in concert with two CArG elements. J Biol Chem. 1997; 272: 10948–10956.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Li X, Van Putten V, Zarinetchi F, Nicks ME, Thaler S, Heasley LE, Nemenoff RA. Suppression of smooth-muscle alpha-actin expression by platelet-derived growth factor in vascular smooth-muscle cells involves Ras and cytosolic phospholipase A2. Biochem J. 1997; 327 (Pt 3): 709–716.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Reusch P, Wagdy H, Reusch R, Wilson E, Ives HE. Mechanical strain increases smooth muscle and decreases nonmuscle myosin expression in rat vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res. 1996; 79: 1046–1053.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Su B, Mitra S, Gregg H, Flavahan S, Chotani MA, Clark KR, Goldschmidt-Clermont PJ, Flavahan NA. Redox regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation. Circ Res. 2001; 89: 39–46.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Pidkovka NA, Cherepanova OA, Yoshida T, Alexander MR, Deaton RA, Thomas JA, Leitinger N, Owens GK. Oxidized phospholipids induce phenotypic switching of vascular smooth muscle cells in vivo and in vitro. Circ Res. 2007; 101: 792–801.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Ang AH, Tachas G, Campbell JH, Bateman JF, Campbell GR. Collagen synthesis by cultured rabbit aortic smooth-muscle cells. Alteration with phenotype. Biochem J. 1990; 265: 461–469.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Rong JX, Shapiro M, Trogan E, Fisher EA. Transdifferentiation of mouse aortic smooth muscle cells to a macrophage-like state after cholesterol loading. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100: 13531–13536.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Wolfbauer G, Glick JM, Minor LK. Rothblat growthhormone (GH). Development of the smooth muscle foam cell: uptake of macrophage lipid inclusions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986; 83: 7760–7764.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Faggiotto A, Ross R, Harker L. Studies of hypercholesterolemia in the nonhuman primate. I. Changes that lead to fatty streak formation. Arteriosclerosis. 1984; 4: 323–340.[Abstract]
  35. Klouche M, Rose-John S, Schmiedt W, Bhakdi S. Enzymatically degraded, nonoxidized LDL induces human vascular smooth muscle cell activation, foam cell transformation, and proliferation. Circulation. 2000; 101: 1799–1805.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Ruan XZ, Moorhead JF, Tao JL, Ma KL, Wheeler DC, Powis SH, Varghese Z. Mechanisms of dysregulation of low-density lipoprotein receptor expression in vascular smooth muscle cells by inflammatory cytokines. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006; 26: 1150–1155.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Takahashi M, Takahashi S, Suzuki C, Jia L, Morimoto H, Ise H, Iwasaki T, Hattori H, Suzuki J, Miyamori I, Kobayashi E, Ikeda U. IL-1beta attenuates beta-very low-density lipoprotein uptake and its receptor expression in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2005; 38: 637–646.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Lim HJ, Lee S, Lee KS, Park JH, Jang Y, Lee EJ, Park HY. PPARgamma activation induces CD36 expression and stimulates foam cell like changes in rVSMCs. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2006; 80: 165–174.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Matsumoto K, Hirano K, Nozaki S, Takamoto A, Nishida M, Nakagawa-Toyama Y, Janabi MY, Ohya T, Yamashita S, Matsuzawa Y. Expression of macrophage (Mphi) scavenger receptor, CD36, in cultured human aortic smooth muscle cells in association with expression of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-gamma, which regulates gain of Mphi-like phenotype in vitro, and its implication in atherogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000; 20: 1027–1032.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Bickel PE, Freeman MW. Rabbit aortic smooth muscle cells express inducible macrophage scavenger receptor messenger RNA that is absent from endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1992; 90: 1450–1457.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Wagsater D, Olofsson PS, Norgren L, Stenberg B, Sirsjo A. The chemokine and scavenger receptor CXCL16/SR-PSOX is expressed in human vascular smooth muscle cells and is induced by INF gamma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004; 325: 1187–1193.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Li H, Freeman MW, Libby P. Regulation of smooth muscle cell scavenger receptor expression in vivo by atherogenic diets and in vitro by cytokines. J Clin Invest. 1995; 95: 122–133.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Ross R. Atherosclerosis–an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340: 115–126.[Free Full Text]
  44. Pitas RE. Expression of the acetyl low density lipoprotein receptor by rabbit fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells. Up-regulation by phorbol esters. J Biol Chem. 1990; 265: 12722–12727.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Floren CH, Albers JJ, Bierman EL. Uptake of chylomicron remnants causes cholesterol accumulation in cultured human arterial smooth muscle cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1981; 663: 336–349.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Yu KC, Mamo JC. Binding and uptake of chylomicron remnants by cultured arterial smooth muscle cells from normal and Watanabe-heritable-hyperlipidemic rabbits. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997; 1346: 212–220.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Botham KM, Bravo E, Elliott J, Wheeler-Jones CP. Direct interaction of dietary lipids carried in chylomicron remnants with cells of the artery wall: implications for atherosclerosis development. Curr Pharm Des. 2005; 11: 3681–3695.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Nagao S, Murao K, Imachi H, Cao WM, Yu X, Li J, Matsumoto K, Nishiuchi T, Ahmed RA, Wong NC, Ueda K, Ishida T. Platelet derived growth factor regulates ABCA1 expression in vascular smooth muscle cells. FEBS Lett. 2006; 580: 4371–4376.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Huo Y, Ley K. Adhesion molecules and atherogenesis. Acta Physiol Scand. 2001; 173: 35–43.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Braun M, Pietsch P, Schror K, Baumann G, Felix SB. Cellular adhesion molecules on vascular smooth muscle cells. Cardiovasc Res. 1999; 41: 395–401.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Cai Q, Lanting L, Natarajan R. Interaction of monocytes with vascular smooth muscle cells regulates monocyte survival and differentiation through distinct pathways. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24: 2263–2270.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Cai Q, Lanting L, Natarajan R. Growth factors induce monocyte binding to vascular smooth muscle cells: implications for monocyte retention in atherosclerosis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2004; 287: C707–C714.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Jang Y, Lincoff AM, Plow ejectionfactor (EF), Topol EJ. Cell adhesion molecules in coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994; 24: 1591–1601.[Abstract]
  54. O’Brien KD, Allen MD, McDonald TO, Chait A, Harlan JM, Fishbein D, McCarty J, Ferguson M, Hudkins K, Benjamin CD, Lobb R, Alpers CE. Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 is expressed in human coronary atherosclerotic plaques. Implications for the mode of progression of advanced coronary atherosclerosis. J Clin Invest. 1993; 92: 945–951.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  55. Endres M, Laufs U, Merz H, Kaps M. Focal expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in the human carotid bifurcation. Stroke. 1997; 28: 77–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Wong BW, Wong D, McManus BM. Characterization of fractalkine (CX3CL1) and CX3CR1 in human coronary arteries with native atherosclerosis, diabetes mellitus, and transplant vascular disease. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2002; 11: 332–338.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  57. Barlic J, Zhang Y, Foley JF, Murphy PM. Oxidized lipid-driven chemokine receptor switch, CCR2 to CX3CR1, mediates adhesion of human macrophages to coronary artery smooth muscle cells through a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma-dependent pathway. Circulation. 2006; 114: 807–819.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Barlic J, Zhang Y, Murphy PM. Atherogenic lipids induce adhesion of human coronary artery smooth muscle cells to macrophages by up-regulating chemokine CX3CL1 on smooth muscle cells in a TNFalpha-NFkappaB-dependent manner. J Biol Chem. 2007; 282: 19167–19176.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Isner JM, Kearney M, Bortman S, Passeri J. Apoptosis in human atherosclerosis and restenosis. Circulation. 1995; 91: 2703–2711.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  60. Raines EW, Ferri N. Thematic review series: The immune system and atherogenesis. Cytokines affecting endothelial and smooth muscle cells in vascular disease. J Lipid Res. 2005; 46: 1081–1092.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Engelberg H. Endogenous heparin activity deficiency: the ‘missing link’ in atherogenesis? Atherosclerosis. 2001; 159: 253–260.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  62. O’Brien KD, Olin KL, Alpers CE, Chiu W, Ferguson M, Hudkins K, Wight TN, Chait A. Comparison of apolipoprotein and proteoglycan deposits in human coronary atherosclerotic plaques: colocalization of biglycan with apolipoproteins. Circulation. 1998; 98: 519–527.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  63. Chait A, Wight TN. Interaction of native and modified low-density lipoproteins with extracellular matrix. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2000; 11: 457–463.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  64. Camejo G, Fager G, Rosengren B, Hurt-Camejo E, Bondjers G. Binding of low density lipoproteins by proteoglycans synthesized by proliferating and quiescent human arterial smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem. 1993; 268: 14131–14137.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Chang MY, Potter-Perigo S, Tsoi C, Chait A, Wight TN. Oxidized low density lipoproteins regulate synthesis of monkey aortic smooth muscle cell proteoglycans that have enhanced native low density lipoprotein binding properties. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 4766–4773.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Bond M, Sala-Newby GB, Newby AC. Focal adhesion kinase (FAK)-dependent regulation of S-phase kinase-associated protein-2 (Skp-2) stability. A novel mechanism regulating smooth muscle cell proliferation. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279: 37304–37310.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  67. Koyama H, Raines EW, Bornfeldt KE, Roberts JM, Ross R. Fibrillar collagen inhibits arterial smooth muscle proliferation through regulation of Cdk2 inhibitors. Cell. 1996; 87: 1069–1078.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  68. Koyama N, Kinsella MG, Wight TN, Hedin U, Clowes AW. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans mediate a potent inhibitory signal for migration of vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res. 1998; 83: 305–313.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  69. Roy J, Tran PK, Religa P, Kazi M, Henderson B, Lundmark K, Hedin U. Fibronectin promotes cell cycle entry in smooth muscle cells in primary culture. Exp Cell Res. 2002; 273: 169–177.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  70. Edwards IJ, Wagner WD. Distinct synthetic and structural characteristics of proteoglycans produced by cultured artery smooth muscle cells of atherosclerosis-susceptible pigeons. J Biol Chem. 1988; 263: 9612–9620.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  71. Wight TN, Kinsella MG, Lark MW, Potter-Perigo S. Vascular cell proteoglycans: evidence for metabolic modulation. Ciba Found Symp. 1986; 124: 241–259.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  72. Liao Y, Regan CP, Manabe I, Owens GK, Day KH, Damon DN, Duling BR. Smooth muscle-targeted knockout of connexin43 enhances neointimal formation in response to vascular injury. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007; 27: 1037–1042.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  73. Dikalova A, Clempus R, Lassegue B, Cheng G, McCoy J, Dikalov S, San Martin A, Lyle A, Weber DS, Weiss D, Taylor WR, Schmidt HH, Owens GK, Lambeth JD, Griendling KK. Nox1 overexpression potentiates angiotensin II-induced hypertension and vascular smooth muscle hypertrophy in transgenic mice. Circulation. 2005; 112: 2668–2676.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  74. Zhang Y, Griendling KK, Dikalova A, Owens GK, Taylor WR. Vascular hypertrophy in angiotensin II-induced hypertension is mediated by vascular smooth muscle cell-derived H2O2. Hypertension. 2005; 46: 732–737.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  75. Wamhoff BR, Sinha S, Owens GK. Conditional mouse models to study developmental and pathophysiological gene function in muscle. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2007; 178: 441–468.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  76. Regan CP, Manabe I, Owens GK. Development of a smooth muscle-targeted cre recombinase mouse reveals novel insights regarding smooth muscle myosin heavy chain promoter regulation. Circ Res. 2000; 87: 363–369.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  77. Regan CP, Adam PJ, Madsen CS, Owens GK. Molecular mechanisms of decreased smooth muscle differentiation marker expression after vascular injury. J Clin Invest. 2000; 106: 1139–1147.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  78. Wolfsgruber W, Feil S, Brummer S, Kuppinger O, Hofmann F, Feil R. A proatherogenic role for cGMP-dependent protein kinase in vascular smooth muscle cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100: 13519–13524.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  79. Feil S, Hofmann F, Feil R. SM22alpha modulates vascular smooth muscle cell phenotype during atherogenesis. Circ Res. 2004; 94: 863–865.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  80. Clarke MC, Figg N, Maguire JJ, Davenport AP, Goddard M, Littlewood TD, Bennett MR. Apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells induces features of plaque vulnerability in atherosclerosis. Nat Med. 2006; 12: 1075–1080.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  81. Leon ML, Zuckerman SH. Gamma INF: a central mediator in atherosclerosis. Inflamm Res. 2005; 54: 395–411.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  82. Gupta S, Pablo AM, Jiang X, Wang N, Tall AR, Schindler C. IFN-gamma potentiates atherosclerosis in ApoE knock-out mice. J Clin Invest. 1997; 99: 2752–2761.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  83. Gerdes N, Sukhova GK, Libby P, Reynolds RS, Young JL, Schonbeck U. Expression of IL-18 and functional IL-18 receptor on human vascular endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, and macrophages: implications for atherogenesis. J Exp Med. 2002; 195: 245–257.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  84. Isoda K, Sawada S, Ishigami N, Matsuki T, Miyazaki K, Kusuhara M, Iwakura Y, Ohsuzu F. Lack of IL-1 receptor antagonist modulates plaque composition in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24: 1068–1073.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  85. Tellides G, Tereb DA, Kirkiles-Smith NC, Kim RW, Wilson JH, Schechner JS, Lorber MI, Pober JS. INF-gamma elicits arteriosclerosis in the absence of leukocytes. Nature. 2000; 403: 207–211.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  86. Elhage R, Jawien J, Rudling M, Ljunggren HG, Takeda K, Akira S, Bayard F, Hansson GK. Reduced atherosclerosis in IL-18 deficient apolipoprotein E-knockout mice. Cardiovasc Res. 2003; 59: 234–240.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  87. Mallat Z, Gojova A, Marchiol-Fournigault C, Esposito B, Kamate C, Merval R, Fradelizi D, Tedgui A. Inhibition of transforming growth factor-beta signaling accelerates atherosclerosis and induces an unstable plaque phenotype in mice. Circ Res. 2001; 89: 930–934.