Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2008;28:705-710
Published online before print February 7, 2008, doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.155333
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Additional Materials
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/4/705    most recent
ATVBAHA.107.155333v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Payeli, S.K.
Right arrow Articles by Tanner, F.C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Payeli, S.K.
Right arrow Articles by Tanner, F.C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2008;28:705.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Cell Biology/Signaling

Prothrombotic Gene Expression Profile in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells of Human Saphenous Vein, but Not Internal Mammary Artery

S.K. Payeli; R. Latini; C. Gebhard; A. Patrignani; U. Wagner; T.F. Lüscher; F.C. Tanner

From Cardiovascular Research, Physiology Institute (S.K.P., R.L., C.G., T.F.L., F.C.T.), the Center for Integrative Human Physiology (S.K.P., R.L., C.G., T.F.L., F.C.T.), and the Functional Genomics Center Zurich (A.P., U.W.), University of Zurich, and Cardiology (C.G., T.F.L., F.C.T.), Cardiovascular Center, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.

Correspondence to Felix C. Tanner, MD, Cardiovascular Research, Physiology Institute, University of Zurich and Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, University Hospital Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland. E-mail felix.tanner{at}access.uzh.ch


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— The resistance of internal mammary artery (IMA) toward thrombotic occlusion and accelerated atherosclerosis is not well understood. This study analyzed gene expression profiles of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) from IMA versus saphenous vein (SV).

Methods and Results— 54'675 probe sets were examined by Affymetrix microarrays. Thirty-one genes belonged to the coagulation system; 2 were differentially expressed, namely tissue factor (TF) and tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA). TF was 3.1-fold lower in IMA than SV (P=0.006), whereas tPA was 9.0-fold higher (P<0.001). TF mRNA expression was lower in IMA than SV (P<0.05); tPA was higher (P<0.001). TF protein expression was 4.2±0.5-fold lower in IMA than SV (P<0.001); tPA was 2.6±0.4-fold higher (P<0.01). In IMA VSMC supernatant, TF protein and activity was lower (P<0.05), TFPI and tPA protein higher (P<0.05 and P<0.005), and clotting time of human plasma prolonged (P<0.05) as compared to SV. Migration to TF/FVIIa (10–9 mol/L) was 3-fold lower in IMA than SV (P=0.01); PAR-2 protein expression was similar (P=NS), PAR-2 blockade without effect (P=NS).

Conclusions— Among the genes of the coagulation system, TF and tPA are differentially expressed in VSMCs from IMA versus SV. This is consistent with protection of IMA from thrombus formation and vascular remodeling.

Expression profiles of coagulation genes were analyzed by Affymetrix microarrays in vascular smooth muscle cells from internal mammary artery (IMA) versus saphenous vein (SV). TF expression was lower in IMA than SV, whereas tPA was higher. This pattern is consistent with protection of IMA from thrombus formation and vascular remodeling.


Key Words: bypass graft disease • tissue factor • tissue plasminogen activator • coagulation • migration


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Coronary artery bypass grafting improves prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease.1,2 Various factors predict graft patency, such as the surgical technique, cardiovascular risk factors, and low left ventricular ejection fraction.3,4 In addition, the type of graft has a major influence on survival; indeed, patients with 2- or 3-vessel disease receiving an internal mammary artery (IMA) in addition to saphenous vein (SV) grafts exhibit higher long-term survival rates as compared to patients treated with veins only.1,2 This difference is related to the occurrence of SV graft disease, an adaptive response of venous grafts leading to accelerated atherosclerosis, whereas the IMA is strikingly resistant toward such alterations.5

SV graft disease is determined by thrombosis, intimal hyperplasia, and accelerated atherosclerosis.6 Thrombosis is the main cause for vein graft occlusion within the first months after bypass surgery, whereas the neointimal changes prevail at later stages. Even when conducted under optimized conditions, harvesting of SV grafts causes extensive endothelial disruption; indeed, more than 50% of the endothelial layer is denuded after preparation.7 Loss of the endothelium activates coagulation via the exposure of tissue factor (TF), a key protease activator forming a catalytic complex with factor VIIa and thereby initiating coagulation, on vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs).8 The important role of TF in the hemostatic activation phase early after bypass surgery is underscored by the observation that expression of TF is enhanced after coronary artery bypass grafting irrespective of whether an on-pump or off-pump procedure was performed.9 To limit thrombus formation, vascular cells express fibrinolytic proteins such as tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), an enzyme mediating the conversion of plasminogen to plasmin. The endothelium is indeed a rich source of tPA; loss of the endothelial layer renders fibrinolysis dependent on tPA released from VSMCs.10

In the pathogenesis of bypass graft disease, thrombosis is interlinked with the development of intimal hyperplasia and accelerated atherosclerosis. VSMCs indeed migrate and proliferate in response to both coagulation factors and platelet-derived mediators.11,12 TF/FVIIa is known to stimulate migration of VSMCs; accordingly, mice lacking the cytoplasmic domain of TF exhibit reduced neointima formation and vascular remodeling after femoral artery injury.13 Hence, mediators primarily regulating thrombus formation in bypass grafts may affect the development of later stages of bypass graft disease as well.

VSMCs are a heterogenous cell population, and different intrinsic properties of VSMCs from IMA versus SV seem to represent an important factor in the pathogenesis of bypass graft disease. VSMCs from IMA indeed exhibit lower contractility as well as lower proliferation and migration rates compared to cells from SV.5,12,14 To improve our understanding of this heterogeneity, we compared the expression profile of genes involved in coagulation between VSMCs from IMA and SV segments retrieved during coronary artery bypass surgery using the Affymetrix microarray technology.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
For the detailed Materials and Methods please see online supplement Materials and Methods at http://atvb.ahajournals.org.

VSMCs of IMA and SV were isolated from 9 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. VSMCs were cultured as described14 and only compared if they originated from the same patient.

RNA was isolated using TRIZOL reagent. 15 µg of biotin-labeled cRNA samples were randomly fragmented at 94°C and hybridized to human genome U133 Plus 2.0 arrays. An Affymetrix gene chip scanner 3000 was used to measure fluorescent intensity. Values were always represented with respect to IMA VSMCs. Only genes exhibiting a more than 2-fold difference in expression were included for further analysis.

Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was applied to confirm microarray data as described.15 Protein expression was determined by Western blot analysis as described15; alternatively, ELISA was used. The effect of VSMC supernatant on clotting time was determined using a Start fibrometer after initiating coagulation by the addition of 50 µL calcium chloride. VSMC migration in response to TF/FVIIa complex was assessed in a 48-well modified Boyden chamber (Neuroprobe) as described.12


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Eight Genes Related to Blood Coagulation Are Differentially Expressed in VSMCs From IMA and SV
Gene expression profiles of VSMCs from IMA and SV segments obtained from 9 patients during coronary artery bypass surgery were assessed by Affymetrix human genome U133 Plus 2.0 arrays (54'675 probe sets). According to the Affymetrix database, 247 genes are related to blood coagulation; the relative expression levels of these genes are indicated along with the respective probability values (n=9) in the online supplement "Gene List" at http://atvb.ahajournals.org. Among the 247 genes, 8 genes (11 probe sets) were differentially expressed in VSMCs from IMA versus SV as defined by a more than 2-fold difference in expression level and statistical significance (P<0.05) in the online supplement Figure at http://atvb.ahajournals.org.

Two Genes Belonging to the Coagulation System Are Differentially Expressed in VSMCs From IMA and SV
The 247 genes related to blood coagulation were filtered by the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG; University of Tokyo) pathway database. This analysis indicated 31 genes belonging to the coagulation system (Figure 1). The gene expression profile of these 31 genes was compared between VSMCs from IMA and SV, which revealed 2 genes differentially expressed in VSMCs from IMA versus SV as defined by a more than 2-fold difference in expression level and statistical significance (P<0.05), namely tissue factor (TF; F3) and t-PA (tPA; PLAT). Expression of TF was 3.1-fold lower in VSMCs from IMA than SV (P=0.006), whereas that of tPA was 9.0-fold higher in IMA than SV (P<0.001). In contrast to tPA, expression of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) was not altered in VSMCs from SV as compared to IMA (n=9; P=NS).


Figure 1
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Expression of 54'675 probe sets is analyzed in vascular smooth muscle cells from internal mammary artery (IMA) and saphenous vein (SV) by the human genome U133 Plus 2.0 array. 31 genes are directly involved in coagulation; 2 of them are differentially expressed: tissue factor (F3) and tissue plasminogen activator (PLAT).

Expression of tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), the physiological inhibitor of TF, and plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)-1, the endogenous antagonist of tPA, was assessed as well. Analysis of the 5 TFPI probe sets revealed very small differences in expression between IMA and SV; the average expression level was 1.2-fold lower in IMA as compared to SV. This difference was not significant in 4 of the 5 probe sets (n=9; P=NS), while reaching significance in 1 probe set (n=9; P<0.05; Figure 2A). The 3 PAI-1 probe sets exhibited minor differences in mRNA expression between IMA and SV VSMCs; the average expression level in IMA was 1.5-fold higher than in SV, and this difference was significant in all the probe sets (P<0.05; Figure 2B).


Figure 2
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Expression profile of tissue factor (TF), t-PA (tPA), tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) in vascular smooth muscle cells from internal mammary artery (IMA) and saphenous vein (SV).

Validation of Microarray Data at the mRNA and Protein Level
TF mRNA expression was analyzed by real-time PCR and observed to be 3.4±1.0-fold lower in VSMCs from IMA as compared to SV (n=4; P<0.05; Figure 3A, upper panel). The increase in TF mRNA expression after thrombin stimulation reached 2.6-fold in IMA and 1.9-fold in SV VSMCs as compared to basal level (n=4; P<0.01 for IMA and P=0.01 for SV). Real-time PCR also confirmed higher tPA mRNA expression in VSMCs from IMA as compared to SV (6.1-fold difference; n=4; P<0.001; Figure 3B, upper panel). Stimulation with thrombin did not affect the expression of tPA in VSMCs from IMA or SV (n=4; P=NS).


Figure 3
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Validation of microarray data in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) from internal mammary artery (IMA) and saphenous vein (SV) at the mRNA level (upper panels) by real time-PCR and protein level (middle and lower panels) by Western blotting or ELISA.

Western blot analysis for TF protein expression revealed a 4.2±0.5-fold lower TF protein expression in VSMCs from IMA as compared to SV (n=5; P<0.001; Figure 3A, middle panel). Similarly, cellular TF activity (cytoplasmic and membrane) was 1.4±1.9 pmoles in IMA and 29.0±3.1 in SV (n=5; P<0.005; Figure 3A, lower panel). The increase in TF protein expression after thrombin stimulation was comparable in VSMCs from IMA (1.8±0.4-fold; n=5) and SV (2.1±0.7-fold; n=5), and the expression level was 5.2±1.6-fold lower in IMA as compared to SV under these conditions (n=5; P<0.05). tPA protein levels were 2.6±0.4-fold higher in the supernatant of VSMCs from IMA as compared to SV (n=3; P<0.01; Figure 3B, middle panel), reaching 20.5±4.8 ng/mL in IMA and 3.3±1.8 ng/mL in SV (n=7; P<0.01; Figure 3B, lower panel). Stimulation with thrombin did not affect tPA levels in VSMCs from IMA and SV (n=3; P=NS).

Modulation of Coagulation by VSMCs From IMA and SV
The functional relevance of the different gene expression profile in VSMCs from IMA and SV was assessed. VSMCs were first serum-starved for 48 hours, and after this time period, cell supernatant was added to citrated human plasma followed by analysis of clotting time. When supernatant from IMA was compared to SV, TF protein was lower (39.0±20.4 versus 95.3±33.1 pg/mL; n=5; P<0.05; Figure 4A) in an ELISA, TF activity was lower (10.7±1.4 versus 18.6±2.7 pmol; n=6; P<0.05; Figure 4B), TFPI protein was higher (6.0±1.4 versus 4.4±1.3 ng/mL; n=6; P<0.05; Figure 4C), and tPA protein was higher (Figure 3B). Consistent with these findings, clotting time was prolonged in the presence of supernatant from IMA (208±29 seconds) as compared to SV (117±16 seconds; n=4; P<0.05; Figure 4D).


Figure 4
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Modulation of clotting time of human plasma by supernatant of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) from internal mammary artery (IMA) and saphenous vein (SV). A, TF protein. B, TF activity. C, TFPI protein. D, Clotting time.

Migration of VSMCs From IMA and SV
TF surface expression was slightly lower in VSMCs from IMA as compared to SV (Figure 5A). Similarly, TF surface activity was 1.4-fold lower in IMA (n=6; P=NS; Figure 5B). Migration in response to the TF/FVIIa complex (10–9 mol/L) was 3.0-fold lower in VSMCs from IMA as compared to SV (n=4; P=0.01; Figure 5C). PAR-2 protein expression was similar in both cell types (n=4; P=NS; data not shown). A PAR-2 cleavage blocking antibody did not affect the response of VSMCs to TF/VIIa (n=4; P=NS; data not shown).


Figure 5
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. TF/FVIIa-induced migration of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) from internal mammary artery (IMA) and saphenous vein (SV). A, Immunofluorescence analysis of TF surface expression. B, TF surface activity. C, Migration to TF-FVIIa.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
This study demonstrates that, among the genes of the coagulation system, only TF and tPA are differentially expressed in VSMCs from IMA versus SV. TF, the key protein for thrombus initiation, was expressed at a lower level in IMA VSMCs, whereas tPA, a major regulator of fibrinolysis, was expressed at a higher level in these cells. Consistently, conditioned media from IMA VSMCs induced a smaller reduction in clotting time of human plasma than media from SV. Moreover, IMA VSMCs responded to TF/FVIIa by a weaker migration than those from SV. These data demonstrate that IMA VSMCs exhibit intrinsic functional differences as compared to those from SV regarding the regulation of coagulation and vascular remodeling, and, although performed in vitro, offer an explanation for the protection of IMA from thrombosis and bypass graft disease. Although VSMCs were isolated from patients with coronary artery disease, neither IMA nor SV exhibited any atherosclerosis; hence, their properties reflect primary intrinsic differences and may be present in individuals without any atherosclerosis as well. Moreover, the properties of IMA do not seem to extend to other arteries, because it is unique in its resistance toward atherosclerosis, whereas veins in general may be similar to the SV.

As the major initiator of coagulation, TF plays an important role in the pathogenesis of thrombosis. Increased levels of TF antigen are detectable in atheroma of patients with acute coronary syndromes16; moreover, TF plasma levels are enhanced during and after coronary artery bypass surgery, suggesting that TF is involved in early graft occlusion.17–19 This study demonstrates that VSMCs from IMA express less TF than those from SV at both the RNA and the protein level.20,21 Although the difference in TF expression is smaller and may have less functional consequences than that in tPA expression, the lower TF expression in IMA VSMCs may protect this vessel from thrombotic occlusion if an endothelial erosion or denudation occurs, which is particularly important in the early postoperative phase. Indeed, IMA exhibits a dual protection from thrombus formation, as it cannot only be prepared with less endothelial damage, but its subendothelial gene expression profile is less thrombogenic than that of the SV, where endothelial damage during surgical preparation is extensive.

Tissue factor activity is counterbalanced by its endogenous inhibitor, TFPI. In human arteries, TFPI diminishes thrombogenicity of atherosclerotic plaques and reduces fibrin as well as platelet deposition.22 TFPI release was higher in VSMCs from IMA than SV; hence, the lower TF expression in IMA is not counteracted by a parallel decrease in TFPI and therefore would be expected to represent a true protecting factor in IMA. Because endothelial cells are a major source of TFPI, they may modulate the balance of TF and TFPI; however, these cells are difficult to isolate in sufficient numbers from human bypass vessels.

Subacute or late occlusion of coronary artery bypass grafts occurs as a result of migration and proliferation of VSMCs leading to neointimal growth and the accelerated formation of atherosclerotic lesions.6 Besides activating the coagulation cascade, TF is involved in regulating vascular remodelling. Indeed, TF is the receptor for FVIIa and as such mediates cellular responses like migration and proliferation of VSMCs23–25; consistently, low TF expression induces less arterial remodeling in vivo. IMA VSMCs did not only exhibit lower TF expression, but also lower migration in response to TF, indicating that the IMA is protected from both thrombus formation and vascular remodeling. PAR-2 has been described to play a role in signaling the migratory response to TF/FVIIa.24 However, VSMCs from IMA and SV exhibited similar PAR-2 protein expression, and a PAR-2 cleavage blocking antibody did not affect migration in response to TF/VIIa; hence, this receptor does not seem to regulate migration in response to TF/VIIa under our experimental conditions. The slightly lower TF surface expression and activity in IMA as compared to SV may only in part account for the lower migration of IMA VSMCs; hence, additional intrinsic differences in the regulation of migration may well exist. This interpretation is consistent with the observation that migration of IMA VSMCs is lower than that of SV in response to PDGF BB as well.14 These properties may protect the IMA from remodeling and neointima formation and thereby promote the long-term success of IMA grafts.

Although it has been clearly demonstrated that the TF cytoplasmic domain regulates arterial remodeling in vivo,13 it is still a matter of discussion which signal transduction events mediate this effect. Indeed, TF/VIIa was observed to activate the MAP kinases extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK) and p38, the GTPase Rac1, and different Src family members.25–27 The role of these mediators in regulating TF/VIIa-induced migration of VSMCs from human bypass vessels is not known and should be investigated in additional studies.

Antithrombotic mechanisms of vascular cells include the expression of tPA, a fibrinolytic enzyme mediating the conversion of plasminogen to plasmin. tPA indeed induces such an effective thrombolysis that its recombinant forms have several therapeutic indications.28 This study reveals that tPA is expressed at a much higher level in VSMCs from IMA as compared to SV. VSMC supernatant from IMA indeed exerted a lower acceleration of clotting time than supernatant from SV, and this effect seems to be induced by a lower release of TF and a concomitant higher release of TFPI as well as tPA in IMA. These observations suggest a protective role of tPA in IMA. In line with this interpretation, adenoviral tPA gene transfer inhibits thrombus formation and promotes vessel patency in different models of vascular injury.29,30 Hence, the higher tPA production in IMA VSMCs may be equally important for preventing thrombotic events and maintaining graft patency as its lower TF expression.

PAI-1 is a SERPIN that suppresses fibrinolysis by inhibiting the activity of tPA31; thus, excess PAI-1 activity would be expected to overcome the actions of tPA and increase the risk of thrombosis. However, in this study, PAI-1 gene expression was only slightly higher in VSMCs from IMA as compared to SV, indicating that the antithrombotic action of tPA in the IMA grafts is, if at all, to only a minor extent compensated by a concomitant increase in PAI-1 expression.

There is conflicting evidence on the functional role of tPA as a migration modulating factor. Some in vitro studies suggest that tPA stimulates VSMC migration, whereas others indicate that tPA induces migration only in the presence of plasminogen. More recent in vivo research reveals that tPA plays no role or has even a beneficial effect on neointima formation32; moreover, in vivo knockout models indicate that urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), but not tPA, stimulates neointima formation.33 No difference in expression of plasminogen or uPA was observed between VSMCs from IMA and SV, indicating that the effect elicited by the higher tPA production in IMA is not modulated by a concomitant difference in the expression of these fibrinolytic proteins. Further, fibrinolysis rather than facilitation of migration seems to represent the relevant action of tPA in bypass graft disease, as the IMA is resistant against both thrombotic occlusion and neointima formation, and this interpretation is consistent with in vivo studies on the role of tPA in vascular remodeling.33 Moreover, because of intrinsic differences in the regulation of chemotaxis, VSMCs from IMA exhibit less migration than those from SV in response to mediators as different as PDGF BB and TF/FVIIa; hence, these cells would be expected to exhibit a weak migration even if tPA, despite of all the existing evidence, stimulated VSMC migration in bypass vessels.

In conclusion, this study suggests that the IMA is protected from thrombosis and neointima formation by an impaired TF expression in combination with an enhanced tPA production. Although these differences elucidate some properties of IMA, additional studies are required to fully understand the resistance of this vessel toward atherosclerosis. Nevertheless, these observations raise the question of whether a local genetic anticoagulant treatment should be considered in patients with venous bypass grafts in addition to systemic antiplatelet therapy. This question, however, remains to be answered in appropriately designed clinical trials.


*    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Helen Greutert for expert technical assistance.

Sources of Funding

This study was made possible by the GEBERT RÜF FOUNDATION. Further support was obtained from Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 3200B0-113328/1 to F.C.T. and grant no. 3100-068118.02/1 to T.F.L.) and Swiss Heart Foundation.

Disclosures

None.


*    Footnotes
 
S.K.P. and R.L. contributed equally to this study.

Original received September 3, 2007; final version accepted January 20, 2008.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, Stewart RW, Goormastic M, Williams GW, Golding LA, Gill CC, Taylor PC, Sheldon WC. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med. 1986; 314: 1–6.[Abstract]

2. Cameron A, Davis KB, Green G, Schaff HV. Coronary bypass surgery with internal-thoracic-artery grafts–effects on survival over a 15-year period. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334: 216–219.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Goldman S, Zadina K, Krasnicka B, Moritz T, Sethi G, Copeland J, Ovitt T, Henderson W. Predictors of graft patency 3 years after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group No. 297. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 29: 1563–1568.[Abstract]

4. Domanski MJ, Borkowf CB, Campeau L, Knatterud GL, White C, Hoogwerf B, Rosenberg Y, Geller NL. Prognostic factors for atherosclerosis progression in saphenous vein grafts: the postcoronary artery bypass graft (Post-CABG) trial. Post-CABG Trial Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36: 1877–1883.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Luscher TF, Turina MI, Braunwald E (ed). Coronary Artery Graft Disease. Springer Verlag; 1994.

6. Motwani JG, Topol EJ. Aortocoronary saphenous vein graft disease: pathogenesis, predisposition, and prevention. Circulation. 1998; 97: 916–931.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Roubos N, Rosenfeldt FL, Richards SM, Conyers RA, Davis BB. Improved preservation of saphenous vein grafts by the use of glyceryl trinitrate-verapamil solution during harvesting. Circulation. 1995; 92 (Suppl): II31–II36.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Steffel J, Luscher TF, Tanner FC. Tissue factor in cardiovascular diseases: molecular mechanisms and clinical implications. Circulation. 2006; 113: 722–731.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Parolari A, Mussoni L, Frigerio M, Naliato M, Alamanni F, Polvani GL, Agrifoglio M, Veglia F, Tremoli E, Biglioli P, Camera M. The role of tissue factor and P-selectin in the procoagulant response that occurs in the first month after on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005; 130: 1561–1566.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Angles-Cano E, Balaton A, Le BB, Genot E, Elion J, Sultan Y. Production of monoclonal antibodies to the high fibrin-affinity, tissue-type plasminogen activator of human plasma. Demonstration of its endothelial origin by immunolocalization. Blood. 1985; 66: 913–920.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Yang Z, Ruschitzka F, Rabelink TJ, Noll G, Julmy F, Joch H, Gafner V, Aleksic I, Althaus U, Luscher TF. Different effects of thrombin receptor activation on endothelium and smooth muscle cells of human coronary bypass vessels. Implications for venous bypass graft failure. Circulation. 1997; 95: 1870–1876.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Frischknecht K, Greutert H, Weisshaupt C, Kaspar M, Yang Z, Luscher TF, Carrel TP, Tanner FC. Different vascular smooth muscle cell apoptosis in the human internal mammary artery and the saphenous vein. Implications for bypass graft disease. J Vasc Res. 2006; 43: 338–346.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Ott I, Michaelis C, Schuermann M, Steppich B, Seitz I, Dewerchin M, Zohlnhofer D, Wessely R, Rudelius M, Schomig A, Carmeliet P. Vascular remodeling in mice lacking the cytoplasmic domain of tissue factor. Circ Res. 2005; 97: 293–298.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Weiss S, Frischknecht K, Greutert H, Payeli S, Steffel J, Luscher TF, Carrel TP, Tanner FC. Different Migration of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells from Human Coronary Artery Bypass Vessels. Role of Rho/ROCK Pathway. J Vasc Res. 2007; 44: 149–156.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Camici GG, Steffel J, Akhmedov A, Schafer N, Baldinger J, Schulz U, Shojaati K, Matter CM, Yang Z, Luscher TF, Tanner FC. Dimethyl sulfoxide inhibits tissue factor expression, thrombus formation, and vascular smooth muscle cell activation: a potential treatment strategy for drug-eluting stents. Circulation. 2006; 114: 1512–1521.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Mackman N. Role of tissue factor in hemostasis, thrombosis, and vascular development. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24: 1015–1022.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Parolari A, Colli S, Mussoni L, Eligini S, Naliato M, Wang X, Gandini S, Tremoli E, Biglioli P, Alamanni F. Coagulation and fibrinolytic markers in a two-month follow-up of coronary bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003; 125: 336–343.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Chung JH, Gikakis N, Rao AK, Drake TA, Colman RW, Edmunds LH Jr. Pericardial blood activates the extrinsic coagulation pathway during clinical cardiopulmonary bypass. Circulation. 1996; 93: 2014–2018.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Barstad RM, Ovrum E, Ringdal MA, Oystese R, Hamers MJ, Veiby OP, Rolfsen T, Stephens RW, Sakariassen KS. Induction of monocyte tissue factor procoagulant activity during coronary artery bypass surgery is reduced with heparin-coated extracorporeal circuit. Br J Haematol. 1996; 94: 517–525.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Steffel J, Akhmedov A, Greutert H, Luscher TF, Tanner FC. Histamine induces tissue factor expression: implications for acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2005; 112: 341–349.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Guha M, Mackman N. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-Akt pathway limits lipopolysaccharide activation of signaling pathways and expression of inflammatory mediators in human monocytic cells. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277: 32124–32132.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Badimon JJ, Lettino M, Toschi V, Fuster V, Berrozpe M, Chesebro JH, Badimon L. Local inhibition of tissue factor reduces the thrombogenicity of disrupted human atherosclerotic plaques: effects of tissue factor pathway inhibitor on plaque thrombogenicity under flow conditions. Circulation. 1999; 99: 1780–1787.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. D’Andrea MR, Derian CK, Leturcq D, Baker SM, Brunmark A, Ling P, Darrow AL, Santulli RJ, Brass LF, Andrade-Gordon P. Characterization of protease-activated receptor-2 immunoreactivity in normal human tissues. J Histochem Cytochem. 1998; 46: 157–164.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Marutsuka K, Hatakeyama K, Sato Y, Yamashita A, Sumiyoshi A, Asada Y. Protease-activated receptor 2 (PAR2) mediates vascular smooth muscle cell migration induced by tissue factor/factor VIIa complex. Thromb Res. 2002; 107: 271–276.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Cirillo P, Cali G, Golino P, Calabro P, Forte L, De RS, Pacileo M, Ragni M, Scopacasa F, Nitsch L, Chiariello M. Tissue factor binding of activated factor VII triggers smooth muscle cell proliferation via extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation. Circulation. 2004; 109: 2911–2916.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Ott I, Weigand B, Michl R, Seitz I, Sabbari-Erfani N, Neumann FJ, Schömig A. Tissue factor cytoplasmic domain stimulates migration by activation of the GTPase Rac1 and the mitogen-activated protein kinase p38. Circulation. 2005; 111: 349–355.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Siegbahn A, Johnell M, Nordin A, Aberg M, Velling T. TF/VIIa transactivate PDGFRbeta to regulate PDGF-BB-induced chemotaxis in different cell types: involvement of Src and PLC. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008; 28: 135–141.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Llevadot J, Giugliano RP, Antman EM. Bolus fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2001; 286: 442–429.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Carmeliet P, Stassen JM, Van V, I, Meidell RS, Collen D, Gerard RD. Adenovirus-mediated transfer of tissue-type plasminogen activator augments thrombolysis in tissue-type plasminogen activator-deficient and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1-overexpressing mice. Blood. 1997; 90: 1527–1534.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Dichek DA, Anderson J, Kelly AB, Hanson SR, Harker LA. Enhanced in vivo antithrombotic effects of endothelial cells expressing recombinant plasminogen activators transduced with retroviral vectors. Circulation. 1996; 93: 301–309.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Fay WP, Garg N, Sunkar M. Vascular functions of the plasminogen activation system. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007; 27: 1231–1237.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Lijnen HR, Van HB, Lupu F, Moons L, Carmeliet P, Collen D. Function of the plasminogen/plasmin and matrix metalloproteinase systems after vascular injury in mice with targeted inactivation of fibrinolytic system genes. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998; 18: 1035–1045.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Carmeliet P, Moons L, Herbert JM, Crawley J, Lupu F, Lijnen R, Collen D. Urokinase but not tissue plasminogen activator mediates arterial neointima formation in mice. Circ Res. 1997; 81: 829–239.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. A. Parikh and M. A. Costa
Secondary Prevention, the Interventional Way: Prophylactic Drug-Eluting Stents for Nonobstructive Saphenous Vein Graft Disease
Circulation, November 17, 2009; 120(20): 1940 - 1942.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Additional Materials
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/4/705    most recent
ATVBAHA.107.155333v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Payeli, S.K.
Right arrow Articles by Tanner, F.C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Payeli, S.K.
Right arrow Articles by Tanner, F.C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH