Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2008;28:575-579
Published online before print January 3, 2008, doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.157123
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/3/575    most recent
ATVBAHA.107.157123v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lamon-Fava, S.
Right arrow Articles by Asztalos, B. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lamon-Fava, S.
Right arrow Articles by Asztalos, B. F.
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2008;28:575.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical and Population Studies

Plasma Levels of HDL Subpopulations and Remnant Lipoproteins Predict the Extent of Angiographically-Defined Coronary Artery Disease in Postmenopausal Women

Stefania Lamon-Fava; David M. Herrington; David M. Reboussin; Michelle Sherman; Katalin V. Horvath; L. Adrienne Cupples; Charles White; Serkalem Demissie; Ernst J. Schaefer; Bela F. Asztalos

From the Lipid Metabolism Laboratory (S.L.-F., M.S., K.V.H., E.J.S., B.F.A.), Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, Mass; the Department of Internal Medicine–Cardiology (D.M.H.) and the Department of Public Health Sciences (D.M.R.), Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; and the Department of Biostatistics (L.A.C., C.W., S.D.), Boston University, Boston, Mass.

Correspondence to Stefania Lamon-Fava, MD, PhD, Lipid Metabolism Laboratory, Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research, Center on Aging at Tufts University, 711 Washington Street, Boston, MA 02111. E-mail stefania.lamon-fava{at}tufts.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowSubjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Objective— The association of coronary heart disease (CHD) with subpopulations of triglyceride (TG)-rich lipoproteins and high-density lipoproteins (HDL) is established in men, but has not been well characterized in women.

Methods and Results— Plasma HDL subpopulation concentrations, quantified by 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis, and plasma remnant-like particle cholesterol (RLP-C) concentrations were measured in 256 postmenopausal women with established CHD and in 126 CHD-free postmenopausal women. Coronary artery disease was assessed in women with CHD by quantitative coronary angiography. Plasma RLP-C and preβ1 HDL concentrations were higher and {alpha}1 and {alpha}2 HDL concentrations were lower in CHD than in CHD-free women. After adjustment for conventional CHD-risk factors, plasma levels of RLP-C were positively associated with the degree of coronary artery disease. In similar analyses, plasma preβ1 HDL particle concentrations were positively associated and {alpha}2 HDL particle concentrations were inversely associated with the extent of coronary atherosclerosis. Plasma TG, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, and HDL cholesterol levels were not associated with the degree of coronary atherosclerosis.

Conclusions— The degree of coronary atherosclerosis in postmenopausal women is linked to a dysregulation of the TG/HDL metabolism. Subpopulations of TG-rich and HDL lipoproteins are better predictors of disease than TG and HDL cholesterol concentrations.

We measured plasma levels of remnant lipoproteins and HDL subpopulations in 256 postmenopausal women with angiographic evidence of coronary heart disease. The degree of coronary atherosclerosis was positively associated with both remnant lipoprotein levels and preβ1 HDL levels and inversely associated with {alpha}2 HDL levels, but not with TG or HDL cholesterol. Subpopulations of TG-rich and HDL lipoproteins are better predictors of CHD severity than TG and HDL-cholesterol levels.


Key Words: women • angiography • lipoproteins • coronary heart disease


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowSubjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Population-based prospective studies have established an association between plasma triglyceride (TG) levels and risk of coronary heart disease (CHD).1 This association is stronger in women than in men.1 Fasting plasma TG concentrations reflect the concentration of both TG-rich very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL) and remnants of VLDL and chylomicrons. Remnant lipoproteins are generated by lipolysis of TG-rich lipoproteins and play a greater role in CHD risk than their precursors. The first evidence that remnant lipoproteins are related to the development of CHD came from studies conducted more than 50 years ago in which remnant lipoproteins with Svedberg flotation rate of 12 to 60 were isolated by ultracentrifugation.2 More recently, case-control studies conducted predominantly in male patients have supported the concept that remnant lipoproteins play an important role in the development of CHD.3–5 Remnant lipoprotein levels have also been shown to be significantly higher in women with CHD as compared with healthy women in the Framingham Offspring Study.6

The association between low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (C) and increased risk of CHD is well documented.7,8 The National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) has defined an HDL-C <40 mg/dL as an independent risk factor for CHD.9 HDL comprise a number of subpopulations differing in apolipoprotein and lipid composition and representing different stages of the continuous HDL remodeling occurring in plasma. These HDL subpopulations exhibit a different ability to protect from CHD.10 Separation of HDL particles by 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis allows the identification of eight major subpopulations: preβ1 to 2, {alpha}1 to 3, and pre{alpha}1 to 3.11 Previous studies conducted in men have established a protective role of {alpha}1 and {alpha}2 particles against the development of CHD.12,13 These studies have also documented an increased plasma level of {alpha}3 and preβ1 particles in men with CHD as compared with healthy men.12 Very little is known about HDL subpopulations and risk of CHD in women.

The objective of the current study was to assess whether plasma levels of remnant lipoproteins and of HDL subpopulations are significant predictors of the extent of coronary atherosclerosis in a cohort of postmenopausal women with established CHD.


*    Subjects and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Subjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Subjects
Subjects were postmenopausal women participating in the Estrogen Replacement and Atherosclerosis (ERA) trial, whose design has been described previously.14 Briefly, postmenopausal women were enrolled if they had established CHD as assessed by quantitative coronary angiography with ≥30% stenosis of the luminal diameter at 1 or more epicardial coronary arteries. Women with a previous history of thromboembolism, symptomatic gallstones, uncontrolled diabetes or hypertension, or with plasma TG levels >400 mg/dL were excluded from participation in the study. Also, women on hormonal replacement therapy were asked to stop treatment for at least 3 months before starting participation. Approval of the study protocol was obtained from the Institutional Review Boards of the different sites involved in patient recruitment. Study candidates provided informed consent. For the purpose of this study, lipoprotein measurements were performed in 256 women for whom plasma samples obtained at the baseline visit and coronary angiography performed at baseline were available.

Postmenopausal women (n=126) participating in cycle 6 of the Framingham Offspring Study (FOS) were randomly selected as a reference population. These women were free of CHD, and of liver, kidney, or thyroid disease. FOS is a long-term prospective observational study of CHD risk.15

Plasma Lipid, HDL Subpopulation, and Lipoprotein Remnant Determinations
Plasma total cholesterol (TC) and TG concentrations were measured by automated enzymatic assays.16 Plasma HDL-C concentrations were measured after heparin-manganese precipitation of apolipoprotein (apo) B–containing lipoproteins.17

Plasma remnant-like particle cholesterol (RLP-C) concentrations were measured using an immunoseparation technique (Polymedco).18,19 This technique uses a monoclonal antibody directed against apoA-I to remove HDL particles, and an anti-apoB antibody that does not recognize partially hydrolyzed lipoprotein remnants to remove both large nascent VLDL and LDL particles. The cholesterol content of the remaining remnant lipoproteins was then measured. The inter-assay CV was <10%.

ApoC-III concentrations in plasma and in the supernatant obtained after the precipitation of apoB-containing lipoproteins with polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000 were measured on a Hitachi 911 autoanalyzer (Hitachi Inc) using an assay and calibrators from Wako Diagnostics.

Plasma apoA-I concentrations were measured using an immunoturbidimetric assay and calibrators from Wako Diagnostics, as previously described.20 ApoA-I–containing HDL subpopulations in plasma were measured by nondenaturing 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis as previously described.11 This method allows for the separation of HDL into 8 separate subpopulations (preβ1 to 2, {alpha}1 to 3, and pre{alpha}1 to 3). The concentration of each HDL subpopulation was calculated by multiplying its percentage with total plasma apoA-I concentration and expressed as mg/dL of total apoA-I. The CV was <10% for {alpha} particles, and was <15% for all other subpopulations.

Angiographic Assessment of Coronary Arteries
Quantitative coronary angiography was performed at baseline according to standard methods.14 A minimum of 3 sets of orthogonal views of the left coronary artery and 1 of the right coronary artery were obtained in each subject. Analysis of angiograms was performed with a previously validated system of cine-projection (SME 3500, Sony). The reference, minimal (the point of greatest narrowing), and average luminal diameters were obtained for 10 proximal epicardial coronary artery segments, as previously described.21 The mean minimal coronary artery diameter was calculated in each subject as the average of the minimal luminal diameter in the 10 coronary segments.

Statistical Analysis
Variables with skewed distribution were log transformed before analyses. Analysis of covariance was used to compare mean lipoprotein and apolipoprotein values between the ERA and FOS groups after adjusting for the following covariates: age, BMI, use of lipid-lowering medications, and diabetes. The association between minimal coronary artery diameter and lipoprotein subfractions (RLP-C and HDL subpopulations) was assessed by mixed-model analysis of covariance with adjustments for location of the segment in the coronary artery tree, age, body mass index (BMI), race, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, use of lipid-lowering medications, and prior percutaneous coronary angioplasty. Because the association between degree of coronary atherosclerosis and lipoprotein subpopulations may not be linear in the models described above, analyses of mean minimal coronary diameter by tertiles of RLP-C and HDL subpopulations, also prespecified, were carried out. These analyses were adjusted for the same CHD-risk factors as listed in the mixed-model analysis. A probability value ≤0.05 was set as statistically significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The baseline characteristics of postmenopausal women participating in the ERA trial are shown in Table 1, together with the characteristics of postmenopausal CHD-free FOS women. ERA women were slightly older, had higher BMI, prevalence of diabetes, and use of lipid-lowering medications than FOS women. ERA women had higher plasma TG and LDL-C and lower HDL-C concentrations than FOS women.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Characteristics of Postmenopausal ERA and FOS Women

Plasma RLP-C concentrations were significantly higher in ERA than in FOS women (Table 2). Plasma HDL-C, apoA-I, and HDL subpopulation {alpha}1, {alpha}2, and pre{alpha}1 and pre{alpha}2 concentrations were significantly lower, whereas HDL subpopulation preβ1 and pre{alpha}3 concentrations were significantly higher in ERA than in FOS women. Figure 1 shows the HDL subpopulation distribution from representative ERA and FOS subjects.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Plasma Concentrations of RLP-C, ApoC-III, and ApoA-I–Containing HDL Subpopulations in Postmenopausal ERA and FOS Women


Figure 1
View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. ApoA-I–containing HDL subpopulation distribution in a representative woman with CHD (ERA) (a) and a healthy normolipidemic woman (FOS) (b). c, schematic representation of HDL subpopulations by 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis.

Plasma RLP-C concentrations were significantly and positively associated with plasma TG and apoC-III levels (Spearman r=0.625 and r=0.702, respectively; P<0.0001) and inversely associated with plasma HDL-C and apoA-I levels (r=–0.436 and –0.194, respectively; P<0.001) in ERA subjects. However, the association of RLP-C with HDL subpopulations was more complex, showing a positive association with preβ1 and {alpha}3 particles (r=0.210, P<0.001; and 0.322, P<0.0001, respectively), and an inverse association with {alpha}1, {alpha}2, pre{alpha}1, and pre{alpha}2 particles (r=–0.523, –0.301, –0.475, and –0.297, respectively; P<0.0001).

In the ERA population, plasma concentrations of RLP-C were associated with minimal coronary artery diameter at baseline (P=0.05; Table 3). No association of minimal coronary artery diameter with plasma TG or apoC-III concentrations was observed (Table 3). Plasma HDL-C and apoA-I concentrations were not significantly associated with the degree of coronary atherosclerosis. However, a significant and inverse association between preβ1 HDL particle concentrations and minimal coronary artery diameter (P<0.01) and a significant and positive association of plasma concentration of {alpha}2 HDL particles with minimal coronary diameter were observed (P<0.03; Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Association of Minimal Coronary Artery Diameter With RLP-C, ApoC-III, and ApoA-I–Containing HDL Subpopulations at Baseline

To further validate the association of the degree of coronary atherosclerosis with plasma RLP-C and HDL subpopulation concentrations, ERA subjects were divided into tertiles according to their plasma lipoprotein concentrations. Regression analyses showed only a trend toward an association between tertiles of RLP-C concentrations and mean minimal coronary artery diameter (P=0.07; Figure 2A). A significant association was observed between mean minimal coronary artery diameter and tertiles of preβ1 (P<0.0001), {alpha}1 (P<0.03), {alpha}2 (P<0.0001), and {alpha}3 (P=0.05) HDL particle concentrations (Figure 2B). Postmenopausal women in the highest tertile for {alpha}1 and {alpha}2 particle concentrations had larger mean minimal coronary diameter than women in the lowest tertile, whereas the reverse was true for preβ1 and {alpha}3 tertiles.


Figure 2
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. A, Mean minimal coronary artery diameter by tertiles of plasma RLP-C levels. B, Mean minimal coronary artery diameter by tertiles of plasma HDL subpopulation levels.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Our study is the first to report an association, although weak, between remnant lipoprotein concentrations and angiographically-defined CHD in postmenopausal women. Previous angiographic studies had shown an association of TG and TG-rich lipoproteins with presence of coronary plaques in women,22,23 but no measurement of remnant lipoproteins was performed in those studies. Some cross-sectional studies have shown plasma levels of RLP-C to be significant independent predictors of CHD risk.6,24 Plasma RLP-C concentrations were also found to be significant and independent predictors of the risk of recurrent events in subjects with CHD.24 Similarly, a measure of remnant lipoproteins, but not TG levels, was significantly correlated with CHD progression in a study of 272 men and 68 women.25 Remnant lipoproteins play a role in the development of CHD through different mechanisms. Remnant lipoproteins have been shown to induce endothelial cell dysfunction26,27 and to enter the subendothelial layer, where they interact with receptors on the surface of macrophages, alter the microenvironment, and promote their own uptake by macrophages and plaque formation.28

Plasma apoC-III levels were highly correlated with plasma TG and RLP-C concentrations in the ERA population, indicating the contribution of this apolipoprotein to the metabolism of TG-rich lipoproteins. However, apoC-III levels in plasma and in HDL were not related to the degree of coronary atherosclerosis in ERA. This observation suggests that other factors, in addition to apoC-III, contribute to plasma remnant lipoprotein concentrations in this population. Although some studies have found apoC-III concentration in HDL or in the non-HDL fraction to be a predictor of CHD in men,29–31 no significant association was found in women.31 This is in agreement with the results of our study. The gender difference in the relationship of apoC-III with CHD should be further investigated.

The inverse association between plasma HDL-C concentrations and CHD risk is well established.7–9 In ERA women, significant associations between minimum luminal coronary diameter and plasma levels of HDL preβ1 (inverse) and {alpha}2 (positive) were observed. These findings were further confirmed by the observation of significant differences in mean minimal coronary diameter by tertiles of plasma preβ1 and {alpha}2 concentrations. No association between HDL-C or apoA-I concentrations and degree of coronary atherosclerosis was observed. Our findings confirm and extend to postmenopausal women recent evidence obtained in men indicating that the profile distribution of HDL subpopulations is more informative than HDL-C concentrations in the assessment of CHD risk.12,13,32–34 Moreover, our results are consistent with observations in men participating in the Veterans Affairs HDL Intervention Trial (VA-HIT), who had established CHD and low HDL-C levels (≤40 mg/dL), similarly to women in the ERA study.33 When VA-HIT subjects were divided into quartiles of different HDL subpopulations, subjects in the upper quartile for preβ1 had a significantly greater risk of recurrent CHD events than subjects in the lowest quartile. In addition, VA-HIT subjects with higher {alpha}2 concentrations had a significantly lower risk of recurrent CHD than subjects with lower concentrations, and the value of {alpha}2 in predicting recurrent CHD was greater than that of {alpha}1.33 We have not noticed a significant association between coronary lumen diameter and plasma {alpha}1 particle levels in the ERA population. This is likely explained by the fact that women in the ERA study had homogeneously low HDL-C and low {alpha}1 particle levels.

HDL particles are involved in different steps in reverse cholesterol transport (RCT), a metabolic pathway responsible for the removal of free cholesterol from peripheral cells and its transport back to the liver for catabolism. Preβ1 HDL particles are small, lipid-poor, apoA-I–containing only particles that interact with the cholesterol transporter ABCA1 (ATP binding cassette A1) to promote cell free-cholesterol efflux. After preβ1 particles pick up cell free-cholesterol they mature into large HDL particles, such as {alpha}1 and {alpha}2 via enzymatic esterification by lecithin:cholesterol acyl transferase (LCAT).35 It has been proposed that increases in preβ1 concentrations reflect an impairment in HDL maturation.33

A limitation of our study is the use of coronary angiography for the assessment of the extent of CHD. When the ERA trial was initiated, coronary angiography was accepted as the gold standard for the assessment of coronary disease lesions. More recently, other diagnostic tools, including intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and 64-slice computed tomography (CT), have shown to have equal or greater accuracy in the assessment of coronary lesions.36,37

Our results strongly support the notion that alterations in plasma lipoprotein levels other than LDL, which is the current target of the NCEP recommendations,9 play an important role in the development of CHD in women. Our findings indicate that the degree of coronary atherosclerosis in postmenopausal women is linked to a dysregulation of the TG-HDL metabolism: increases in remnant lipoprotein levels may be associated with increased lipid deposition in the arterial wall, plaque formation, and the generation of HDL subpopulations that are less efficient in the reverse cholesterol removal from the arterial wall.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Sources of Funding

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health NHLBI grants R01 HL 70081 to S.L.-F. and HL-64738 to B.A., and by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, under agreement No. 58-1950-4-401. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Disclosures

None.


*    Footnotes
 
Original received October 1, 2007; final version accepted December 19, 2007.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Hokanson JE, Austin MA. Plasma triglyceride level as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease independent of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level: a meta-analysis of population-based prospective studies. J Cardiovasc Risk. 1996; 3: 213–219.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Gofman J, Lindgren F, Elliott H, Mantz W, Hewitt J, Strisower B, Herring V, Lyon TP. The role of lipids and lipoproteins in atherosclerosis. Science. 1950; 111: 166–171.[Free Full Text]

3. Simons L, Dwyer T, Simons J, Bernstein L, Mock P, Poonia N, Balasubramaniam S, Baron D, Branson J, Morgan P, Roy P. Chylomicrons and chylomicron remnants in coronary artery disease: a case-control study. Atherosclerosis. 1987; 65: 181–189.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Masuoka H, Ishikura K, Kamei S, Obe T, Seko T, Okuda K, Koyabu S, Tsuneoka K, Tamai T, Sugawa M, Nakano T. Predictive value of remnant-like particles cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio as a new indicator of coronary artery disease. Am Heart J. 1998; 136: 226–230.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Takeichi S, Yukawa N, Nakajima Y, Osawa M, Saito T, Seto Y, Nakano T, Saniabadi AR, Adachi M, Wang T, Nakajima K. Association of plasma triglyceride-rich lipoprotein remnants with coronary atherosclerosis in cases of sudden cardiac death. Atherosclerosis. 1999; 142: 309–315.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. McNamara JR, Shah PK, Nakajima K, Cupples LA, Wilson PWF, Ordovas JM, Schaefer EJ. Remnant-like particle (RLP) cholesterol is an independent cardiovascular disease risk factor in women: results from the Framingham Heart Study. Atherosclerosis. 2001; 154: 229–236.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Gordon T, Castelli WP, Hjortland MC, Kannel WE, Dawber TR. High density lipoprotein as a protective factor against coronary heart disease. The Framingham Study. Am J Med. 1977; 62: 707–714.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Jacobs D, Mebane I, Bangdiwala S, Criqui M, Tyroler A. High density lipoprotein cholesterol as a predictor of cardiovascular disease mortality in men and women: the follow-up study of the Lipid Research Clinics Prevalence Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1990; 131: 32–47.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. The Expert Panel. Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 200116; 285: 2486–2497.[CrossRef]

10. Miller NE. Associations of high-density lipoprotein subclasses and apolipoproteins with ischemic heart disease and coronary atherosclerosis. Am Heart J. 1987; 113: 589–597.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Asztalos BF, Sloop CH, Wong L, Roheim PS. Two-dimensional electrophoresis of plasma lipoproteins: recognition of new apoA-I-containing subpopulations. Bioch Biophys Acta. 1993; 1169: 291–300.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Asztalos BF, Cupples LA, Demissie S, Horvath KV, Cox CE, Batista M, Schaefer EJ. High-density lipoprotein subpopulation profile and coronary heart disease prevalence in male participants of the Framingham Offspring Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24: 2181–2187.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Asztalos BF, Batista M, Horvath KV, Cox CE, Dallal G, Morse JS, Brown GB, Schaefer EJ. Change in alpha1 HDL concentration predicts progression in coronary artery stenosis. Arterioscler, Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23: 847–852.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Herrington DM, Reboussin DM, Brosnihan B, Sharp PC, Shumaker SA, Snyder TE, Furberg CD, Kowalchuk GJ, Stuckey TD, Rogers WJ, Givens DH, Waters D. Effects of estrogen replacement on the progression of coronary-artery atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 522–529.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Feinlab M, Kannel WB, McNamara PM, Garrison RJ, Castelli WP. The Framingham Offspring Study: design and preliminary data. Prev Med. 1975; 4: 518–525.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. McNamara JR, Schaefer EJ. Automated enzymatic standardized lipid analyses for plasma lipoprotein fractions. Clin Chim Acta. 1987; 166: 1–8.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Burstein M, Samaille J. Sur un dosage rapide du cholesterol lie aux alpha- et aux beta-lipoproteines du serum. Clin Chim Acta. 1960; 5: 609–617.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Nakajima K, Saito T, Tamura A. Cholesterol in remnant-like lipoproteins in human serum using monoclonal anti apoB-100 and anti apoA-I immunoaffinity mixed gels. Clin Chim Acta. 1993; 223: 53–71.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. McNamara JR, Shah PK, Nakajima K, Cupples LA, Wilson PW, Ordovas JM, Schaefer EJ. Remnant lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride reference ranges from the Framingham Heart Study. Clin Chem. 1998; 44: 1224–1232.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Contois J, McNamara JR, Lammi-Keefe C, Wilson P, Massov T, Schaefer EJ. Reference intervals for plasma apolipoprotein A-I determined with a standardized commercial immunoturbidimetric assay: results from the Framingham Offspring Study. Clin Chem. 1996; 42: 507–514.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Herrington DM, Reboussin DM, Klein K, Sharp PC, Shumaker SA, Snyder TE, Geisinger K. Estrogen Replacement and Atherosclerosis (ERA) study: study design and baseline characteristics of the cohort. Control Clin Trials. 2000; 21: 257–285.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Nielsen N, Olsson A, Swahn E. Plasma lipoprotein particle concentrations in postmenopausal women with unstable coronary artery disease. Analysis of diagnostic acuracy using receiver operating characteristics. J Intern Med. 2000; 247: 43–52.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Sposito A, Mansur A, Maranhao R, Martinez T, Aldrighi J, Ramires J. Triglyceride and lipoprotein(a) are markers of coronary artery disease severity among postmenopausal women. Maturitas. 2001; 39: 203–208.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Fukushima H, Kugiyama K, Sugiyama S, Honda O, Koide SI, Nakamura SI, Kawano H, Soejima H, Miyamoto S, Yoshimura M. Comparison of remnant-like lipoprotein particles in postmenopausal women with and without coronary artery disease and in men with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2001; 88: 1370–1373.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Phillips NR, Waters D, Havel RJ. Plasma lipoproteins and progression of coronary artery disease evaluated by angiography and clinical events. Circulation. 1993; 88: 2762–2770.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Inoue T, Saniabadi AR, Matsunaga R, Hoshi K, Yaguchi I, Morooka S. Impaired endothelium-dependent acetylcholine-induced coronary artery relaxation in patients with high serum remnant lipoprotein particles. Atherosclerosis. 1998; 139: 363–367.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Doi H, Kugiyama K, Oka H, Sugiyama S, Ogata N, Koide SI, Nakamura SI, Yasue H. Remnant lipoproteins induce proatherothrombogenic molecules in endothelial cells through a redox-sensitive mechanism. Circulation. 2000; 102: 670–676.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Gianturco S, Bradley W. Lipoprotein mediated cellular mechanisms for atherosclerosis in hypertriglyceridemia. Semin Thromb Hemost. 1987; 14: 164–168.

29. Blankenhorn DH, Alaupovic P, Wickham E, Chin H, Azen SP. Prediction of angiographic change in native human coronary arteries and aortocoronary bypass grafts. Lipid and nonlipid factors. Circulation. 1990; 81: 470–476.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Hodis HN, Mack WJ, Azen SP, Alaupovic P, Pogoda J, LaBree L, Hemphill L, Kramsch D, Blankenhorn DH. Triglyceride- and cholesterol-rich lipoproteins have a differential effect on mild/moderate and severe lesion progression as assessed by quantitative coronary angiography in a controlled trial of lovastatin. Circulation. 1994; 90: 42–49.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Onat A, Hergenc G, Sansoy V, Fobker M, Ceyhan K, Toprak S, Assmann G. Apolipoprotein C-III, a strong discriminant of coronary risk in men and a determinant of the metabolic syndrome in both genders. Atherosclerosis. 2003; 168: 81–89.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Asztalos BF, Roheim PS, Milani RL, Lefevre M, McNamara JR, Horvath KV, Schaefer EJ. Distribution of apoA-I-containing HDL subpopulations in patients with coronary heart disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000; 20: 2670–2676.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Asztalos BF, Collins D, Cupples L. A., Demissie S, Horvath KV, Bloomfield HE, Robins SJ, Schaefer EJ. Value of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) subpopulations in predicting recurrent cardiovascular events in the Veterans Affairs HDL Intervention Trial. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005; 25: 2185–2191.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Cheung MC, Brown BG, Wolf A, Albers JJ. Altered particle size distribution of apolipoprotein A-I-containing lipoproteins in subjects with coronary artery disease. J Lipid Res. 1991; 32: 383–394.[Abstract]

35. Asztalos BF, Schaefer EJ, Horvath KV, Yamashita S, Miller M, Franceschini G, Calabresi L. Role of LCAT in HDL remodeling: investigation of LCAT deficiency states. J Lipid Res. 2007; 48: 592–599.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Mintz GS, Painter JA, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Satler LF, Popma JJ, Chuang YC, Bucher TA, Sokolowicz LE, Leon MB. Atherosclerosis in angiographically "normal" coronary artery reference segments: an intravascular study with clinical correlations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 25: 1479–1485.[Abstract]

37. Wilson GT, Gopalakrishnan P, Tak T. Noninvasive cardiac imaging with computed tomography. Clin Med Res. 2007; 5: 165–171.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
E. J. Schaefer, J. A. Gleason, and M. L. Dansinger
Dietary Fructose and Glucose Differentially Affect Lipid and Glucose Homeostasis
J. Nutr., June 1, 2009; 139(6): 1257S - 1262S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/3/575    most recent
ATVBAHA.107.157123v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lamon-Fava, S.
Right arrow Articles by Asztalos, B. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lamon-Fava, S.
Right arrow Articles by Asztalos, B. F.