Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2008;28:455-462
Published online before print February 7, 2008, doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.153239
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Additional Materials
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/3/455    most recent
ATVBAHA.107.153239v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, I. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, I. J.
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2008;28:455.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Integrative Physiology/Experimental Medicine

In Vivo Arterial Lipoprotein Lipase Expression Augments Inflammatory Responses and Impairs Vascular Dilatation

Mayumi Takahashi; Yaeko Hiyama; Masayoshi Yokoyama; Shuiqing Yu; Yunying Hu; Kristan Melford; André Bensadoun; Ira J. Goldberg

From the Department of Medicine (M.T., Y.H., M.Y., S.Y., Y.H., I.J.G.), Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York; Division of Nutritional Sciences (K.M., A.B.), Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

Correspondence to Ira J. Goldberg, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032. E-mail ijg3{at}columbia.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Objective— Although epidemiologic data suggest that hypertriglyceridemia and elevated plasma levels of fatty acids are toxic to arteries, in vitro correlates have been inconsistent. To investigate whether increased endothelial cell expression of lipoprotein lipase (LpL), the primary enzyme creating free fatty acids from circulating triglycerides (TG), affects vascular function, we created transgenic mice that express human LpL (hLpL) driven by the promoter and enhancer of the Tie2 receptor.

Methods and Results— Mice expressing this transgene, denoted EC-hLpL and L for low and H for high expression, had decreased plasma TG levels compared with wild-type mice (WT): 106±31 in WT, 37±17 (line H), and 63±31 mg/dL (line L) because of a reduction in VLDL TG; plasma cholesterol and HDL levels were unaltered. Crossing a high expressing EC-hLpL transgene onto the LpL knockout background allowed for survival of the pups; TG in these mice was approximately equal to that of heterozygous LpL knockout mice. Surprisingly, under control conditions the EC-hLpL transgene did not alter arterial function or endothelial cell gene expression; however, after tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-{alpha} treatment, arterial vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), E-selectin, and endogenous TNF-{alpha} mRNA levels were increased and arteries had impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilatation. This was associated with reduced eNOS dimers.

Conclusions— Therefore, we hypothesize that excess vascular wall LpL augments vascular dysfunction in the setting of inflammation.

Expressing human lipoprotein lipase (LpL) in endothelial cells allows for survival of LpL knockout mice. Although under control conditions, expression of this transgene did not alter inflammatory gene expression in arteries, after TNF-{alpha} treatment there was greater expression of inflammatory molecules and reduced arterial vasodilatation.


Key Words: triglyceride • fatty acids • lipolysis • adhesion molecules • endothelial cells


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Epidemiologic data have implicated circulating levels of triglyceride (TG) with increased cardiac events.1 One of the mechanisms for this is thought to be via toxic effects of lipolysis products such as fatty acids (FAs) and lysolecithin on endothelial cells. Many tissue culture studies have supported this by showing increased expression of adhesion molecules by lysolecithin2 or FAs,3 plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)-1 by FAs,4 and reduced eNOS activity by FAs in the presence of excess glucose.5

LpL is the rate-limiting enzyme for hydrolysis of plasma TG. LpL is synthesized by myocytes and adipocytes but is thought to function primarily on the luminal surface of endothelial cells. Therefore, along the arterial wall much of the exposure of endothelial cells to FAs is modulated by LpL actions.

LpL has been suggested to have a dual effect on atherosclerosis development.6 We and others have demonstrated that LpL contributes to lipid accumulation by stimulating the cellular binding and uptake of atherogenic lipoproteins in different vascular cell types including smooth muscle cells and macrophages.7,8 Moreover, loss of macrophage LpL reduces atherosclerosis.9 LpL acts as an activator of macrophage function, inducing TNF alpha (TNF-{alpha}),10 augmenting monocyte adhesion11,12 and increasing phagocytosis in low glucose conditions.13 Although these data suggest that LpL has atherogenic and inflammatory effects, there are contradictory data. LpL is reported to play an antiinflammatory role through generation of PPAR ligands for endothelial cells14 and macrophages.15 In human endothelial cells, LpL alone attenuated the inflammatory cascade produced by TNF-{alpha}.16 Thus, the function and role of LpL in inflammatory responses are not clear, but may vary depending on the in vitro conditions studied.

To study the actions of LpL in arteries, we created mice with human LpL (hLpL) expression specifically in endothelial cells using the Tie2 promoter-enhancer17 to drive an hLpL minigene. These transgenic mice (denoted EC-hLpL) have reduced plasma levels of VLDL-TG. The transgene rescued LpL knockout mice from neonatal death and allowed us to assess the roles of LpL in arterial biology under control and inflammatory conditions.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Construction of EC-hLpL Transgene and Generation of Transgenic Mice on the Wild-Type Background
The murine Tie2 promoter and enhancer fragment (a gift from Dr Thomas N Sato, University of Texas) was used to generate transgenic mice with vascular endothelial cell specific gene expression.17 A 2.1-kbp HindIII Tie2 promoter fragment was inserted into the NotI/SmaI site of pBluescript SK (+) (Stratagene) [pBl-Tie2P]. The hLpL minigene18 with muscle creatine kinase (MCK) promoter was used as template DNA and was inserted 3' to the Tie2 promoter. The enhancer was then added distal to the LpL 3' UTR (Figure 1A). Translation initiation and termination sites are indicated as ATG and TGA. A NotI/NotI fragment of this construction was purified and microinjected as described.19 Founder animals (C57BL/6J-129Sv hybrids) were continually mated with C57BL/6J mice. N5 generation descendants from these crosses were used for experiments.


Figure 1
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Construction and tissue expression of EC-hLpL. A, Schematic diagram for endothelial specific transgenic construct in which expression of hLPL transgene is driven by promoter and enhancer sequences from the Tie2 gene. B, Expression of EC-hLpL transgene in different tissues from EC-hLpLH (black bars, n=3) and EC-hLpLL (gray bars, n=3) were determined by quantitative real-time PCR. C, hLpL protein levels in different tissues were assayed by ELISA. WT (open bars, n=5), EC-hLpLH (black bars, n=5), and EC-hLpLL (gray bars, n=5). WAT indicates white adipose tissue. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.

Breeding of Mice Expressing hLpL Only in Endothelial Cells
EC-hLpL mice were crossed with heterozygous LpL knockout mice (Lpl+/–).20 Pups expressing the EC-hLpL transgene and heterozygous for LpL deficiency (EC-hLpL/Lpl+/–) were then crossed with Lpl+/– mice to obtain EC-hLpL/Lpl–/– mice and littermates Lpl+/– and EC-hLpL/Lpl+/– mice. All procedures were in accordance with current NIH guidelines and were approved by the Columbia University Animal Care and Use Committee.

Genotyping of Transgenic Mice and Estimation of Copy Number
Genotypes were determined from tail tip DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using hLpL specific primers (sense, 5'-GAGATTTCTCTGTATGGCACC-3'; antisense, 5'-CTGCAAATGAGACACTTTCTC-3') and mouse LpL (mLpL) specific primers (sense, 5'-CTCGCTGGCACCGTTGAGCCTCGTTACCG-3'; antisense, 5'-ACTGGAGCGCGGTGGAGCGCCGTAGGGCA-3', and 5'-GCGGGGCGGGGGGGAACTTCCTGACTAGGGG-3'). To estimate the relative copy number in transgenic mouse lines, 10 {eta}g of tail tip DNA was used for quantitative real-time PCR.

Endothelial Cell and Peritoneal Macrophage Isolations
For endothelial cell isolation, hearts were removed from anesthetized mice, rinsed with PBS, minced into 1-mm3 pieces, and incubated in a collagenase mixture (Liberase Blendzyme 4 [Roche], DMEM low glucose with L-glutamine [Invitrogen]) at 37°C for 30 minutes with occasional agitation. The heart digest was filtered sequentially through sterile 100 and 35 µm nylon mesh (BD Bioscience), centrifuged at 900g for 5 minutes at 4°C, and washed twice with 0.5% BSA-PBS. The cell pellet was resuspended and incubated in 10% FBS-DMEM containing CD31-activated protein C (APC), CD45-PE, and CD41-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) anti-mouse antibodies (BD Bioscience) at 4°C. After 30 minutes, the samples were centrifuged and resuspended in PBS with DAPI (Invitrogen). Live, CD31-positive, CD45/CD41 double negative cells were sorted (BD FACSAria Cell-sorting system) directly into lysis buffer (Qiagen) for RNA isolation. Purity of the cells was confirmed by the presence of endothelial specific receptor tyrosine kinase, and absence of Cd11b, desmin, and collagen type III alpha 1.

Peritoneal macrophages were harvested 3 days after intraperitoneal injection of 40 µg concanavalin A in 0.5 mL sterile PBS. Cells were seeded in 6-well plates for RNA isolation. The isolated cells were incubated in 5 mmol/L glucose containing DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 20% L cell–conditioned medium. Before isolation of RNA, the cells were washed with PBS to remove any excess medium, and cells were scraped from the plate in PBS and pelleted.

Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis
Total RNA was isolated with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). One microgram of total RNA was reverse transcribed by random hexamers and ThermoScript RT-PCR System (Invitrogen). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed with the Stratagene Mx3005 using SYBER Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). The primer sequences were as follows: hLpL (sense, 5'-AGTGAAACCCATACCAATCAGG-3'; antisense, 5'-GAATGGCGAAGCCGGGACT-3'), mLpL (sense, 5'-AGGTGGACATCGGAGAACTG-3'; antisense, 5'–TCCCTAGCACAGAAGATGACC3'), VCAM-1 (VCAM-1) (sense, 5'-CCTCACTTGCAGCACTACGGGCT-3'; antisense, 5'-TTTTCCAATATCCTCAATGACGGG-3'), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) (sense, 5'-TGCGTTTTGGAGCTAGCGGACCA-3'; antisense, 5'-CGAGGACCATACAGCACGTGCAG-3'), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) (sense, 5'-AGGTCTGTGCTGACCCCAAG-3'; antisense, 5'- TGCTTGAGGTGGTTGTGGAA-3'), PAI-1 (sense, 5'-GCCAGATTTATCATCAATGACTGGG-3'; antisense, 5'-GGAGAGGTGCACATCTTTCTCAAAG-3'), E-selectin (sense, 5'-CCGTCCCTTGGTAGTTGCAC-3'; antisense, 5'-CAAGTAGAGCAATGAGGACGATGT-3'), and TNF-{alpha} (sense, 5'-TCAGCGAGGACAGCAAGG–3'; antisense, 5'-GTGAGTGAAAGGGACAGAACC-3'). All values obtained were normalized to mouse 18S rRNA (sense, 5'-CCATCCAATCGGTAGTAGCG-3'; antisense, 5'-GTAACCCGTTGAACCCCATT-3').

LpL Mass and Activity Measurements
To obtain postheparin plasma (PHP), fasted mice were bled 5 minutes after tail vein injection of 100 U of heparin/kg body weight (Elkins-Sinns). LpL mass measurements in tissues were obtained using the homogenization buffer of Hocquette et al21 supplemented with 20 mmol/L Hecameg; addition of Hecameg resulted in a better solubilization of tissue LpL protein. hLpL protein levels were measured by ELISA as described previously by Peterson et al.22 LpL activity was determined using a glycerol-based assay with human serum as the source of apoCII.23 The contribution of hepatic lipase was determined by assay under 1 mol/L NaCl conditions. Mouse antibody for hLpL was used to estimate the amount of human LpL and mouse LpL. Activity, expressed as micromoles of FAs per hour per ml of PHP, was determined by comparison with a standard source of hLpL of known activity.

Lipid and Lipoprotein Determination in Plasma
Blood samples were taken by retro-orbital puncture after an overnight fast. Plasma TG and cholesterol levels were measured enzymatically using kits (Wako Chemicals). Lipoprotein separation was performed by fast performance liquid chromatography (FPLC) of 500 µL pooled plasma on 2 serial Superose 6 columns (Pharmacia). In addition, VLDL (d <1.006 g/mL), IDL/LDL (d=1.006 to 1.063 g/mL), and HDL (d=1.063 to 1.21g/mL) were isolated by sequential ultracentrifugation using a TLA 100 rotor (Beckman Instruments). Fractions were analyzed for TG and cholesterol.

Immunohistochemical Staining of Mouse Aortas
Five-micron paraffin sections of mouse aorta were stained with antibody. Antigen retrieval procedure was performed using Citra Solution according to the manufacturer’s protocol (BioGenex). Primary antibodies were labeled with biotinylated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody and visualized with ABC staining system (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc). Endothelial staining of aorta sections was analyzed with Image-Pro Plus (Version 5.0.1) software (Media Cybernetics Inc). To compare the intensity of staining, endothelial cell areas were selected and integrated optical density was determined in sections.

VLDL Uptake Study
Human VLDL and the density >1.21 g/mL fraction of human plasma (containing cholesteryl ester transfer protein) were isolated by ultracentrifugation. VLDL and >1.21 g/mL fractions were added to dried 15 µCi glycerol [1-14C] trioleate and 150 µCi [1{alpha},2{alpha} (n)-3H] cholesterol oleyl ether (GE Healthcare) and mixed overnight at 37°C. Labeled VLDL were then dialyzed in PBS at 4°C overnight. Anesthetized mice were injected with 4.8x105 dpm [14C] TG and 3.0x106 dpm [3H] cholesterol oleyl ether labeled VLDL into their femoral veins. The disappearance rate of labeled VLDL was determined by measuring the remaining radioactivity in 10 µL of plasma drawn 0.5, 2, 5, 10, 20, and 30 minutes after injection. Immediately after the final time point, mice were perfused with 10 mL of PBS through the left ventricle. The tissue samples were excised and homogenized for analysis.

Vascular Function After TNF-{alpha} Treatment
Mice were given TNF-{alpha} (Sigma), 25 µg/kg body weight by intraperitoneal injection, and femoral arteries and aortas were harvested 4 hours later. Femoral arteries with similar dimensions, isolated with care that the endothelium was intact, were mounted on a small vessel wire myograph (Danish Myo Technology) and maintained at 37°C in physiological buffer that had been bubbled with 5% CO2/95% O2 to achieve a pH of 7.4. The arteries were set to a predetermined optimal internal circumference,24 and viability was assessed as previously described.25 For the relaxation/vasodilatation experiments, arteries were precontracted with 3 µmol/L phenylephrine and relaxed with acetylcholine (endothelium dependent) and sodium nitroprusside (endothelium independent nitric oxide releasing agent). Wall tension was expressed as milliNewton per millimeter (mN/mm) of artery length. Relaxation was expressed as percent decrease of phenylephrine induced tone. Sensitivity to the agonist was expressed as negative log of effective concentration required to produce 50% of maximum effect (–log EC50).

Western Blot
eNOS protein expression levels were analyzed by Western blot. Fifteen micrograms of protein from each femoral artery were separated by low temperature SDS-PAGE.26 After transfer onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, the membrane was blocked by 5% non-fat milk solution. Primary antibody (BD bioscience) was used at a 1:2500 dilution and the bound antibody was detected with horseradish-peroxidase-conjugated detection system (Pierce).

Liver Lipid and Histology
Anesthetized mice were perfused with 10 mL of PBS until the livers blanched. Livers were then excised, weighed, and homogenized in ice-cold PBS. Lipids were extracted with chloroform:methanol (2:1 vol/vol) and extracts were analyzed using kits (Wako). For histology, livers were frozen in OCT compound (Tissue-Tek; Sakura Finetek) and stained for lipid accumulation with Oil Red O.

Statistical Analysis
Results are given as means±SE. Statistical significance was tested using a 2-tailed Student t test. In some cases, ANOVA with a Fisher’s Protected Least Significant Difference test was used. Statistical analysis was done using the StatView version 5.0 (Abacus Concepts).


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Expression of the EC-hLpL Gene in Transgenic Mice
Transgenic mice were generated with an hLpL-minigene driven by an endothelial specific fragment of the murine Tie2 promoter and enhancer; 2 of 4 transgenic mice born after microinjection were used to establish lines. Real-time PCR assay was used to determine the transgene copy number; the higher hLpL expressing line, denoted EC-hLpLH, had 9-fold greater copy number than the lower expressing line, denoted EC-hLpLL (supplemental Figure 1A, available online at http://atvb.ahajournals.org). EC-hLpLH transgenic mice had 928±163 {eta}g/mL and EC-hLpLL mice 497±73 {eta}g/mL hLpL protein in PHP.

hLpL mRNA was detected in all tissues of each transgenic mouse line. When normalized to 18S rRNA, the highest expression was found in lung, white adipose tissue, and aorta (Figure 1B). In EC-hLpLH mice mRNA expression was 1.5- to 5-fold greater than EC-hLPLL mice in brain, skeletal muscle, white adipose tissue, and aorta. mLpL mRNA expression was not reduced by the transgene (supplemental Figure 1B) and several tissues—heart and lung—had modest increases in LpL activity (supplemental Table 1). hLpL protein levels were greater in lung, aorta, and skeletal muscle of line H (Figure 1C). When expressed per mg protein, aortic hLpL content exceeded that of the other tissues.

To verify the endothelial cell expression of the hLpL transgene, cardiac endothelial cells were harvested using flow cytometry. hLpL expression was present in endothelial cells derived from EC-hLpL hearts (supplemental Figure II). hLpL mRNA was not detected in peritoneal macrophages or plasma white cells.

Plasma Lipid Levels in EC-hLpL Transgenic Mice
The effects of the EC-hLpL transgene on plasma lipid profiles are summarized in the Table. Relative to WT mice, TG levels decreased 65% (EC-LpLH) and 41% (EC-LpLL; 37±17 and 63±31 versus 106±31 mg/dL). Plasma cholesterol levels of transgenic mice were similar to WT mice. The FPLC elusion patterns of EC-LpL and WT plasmas are shown in Figure 2A and 2B. The 2 lines had 62% and 51% reductions in VLDL-TG. The plasma samples were also analyzed using ultracentrifugation (Figure 2C and 2D). VLDL-TG levels of EC-hLpLH and EC-hLpLL mice were decreased: WT 40.7±7.4, EC-hLpLH 17.4±6.1, and EC-hLpLL 28.2±6.3 mg/dL. HDL-cholesterol levels were unchanged by the transgene.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table. Plasma TG and Cholesterol Levels of Overnight-Fasted 12- to 13-Week-Old Male Mice


Figure 2
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Lipoprotein profiles and plasma lipoprotein level. Pooled plasmas were applied to columns as described in Methods. TG (A) and Cholesterol (B) distribution patterns of WT (open circle), EC-hLpLH (black circle), and EC-hLpLL (gray circle) mice are shown. Plasmas were also separated by ultracentrifugation. TG (C) and Cholesterol (D) levels of WT (open bars), EC-hLpLH (black bars), and EC-hLpLL (gray bars) were measured. (n=5 to 6). *P<0.05.

Hepatic Expression of EC-hLpL Transgene
Although LpL is primarily expressed in peripheral tissues, the EC-hLpL transgene was also expressed in liver, and gene expression and hLpL protein and activity in livers of the 2 lines of mice were similar (Figure 1B and 1C). This suggested that the relative expression was greater in liver than peripheral tissues of EC-hLpLL compared with EC-hLpLH; the liver to skeletal muscle hLpL mRNA ratios were 0.2 for line H and 0.8 for line L. Livers from EC-hLpLL female mice contained more TG than did WT (WT, 14.8±2.3 versus EC-hLPL, 50.5±5.5 mg/µg protein), but liver cholesterol was not altered. Livers of line EC-hLpLL female, but not male, mice were grossly steatotic and lipid deposition by Oil Red O staining was observed (supplemental Figure III).

Effects of EC-hLpL Expression on Survival of LpL Knockout Mice
Transgenic mouse lines were bred onto Lpl+/– and Lpl–/– backgrounds. Lpl+/– mice had mild hypertriglyceridemia, with 1.8-fold elevated TG levels compared with WT. Introduction of the EC-hLpL transgene lowered TG to levels equal to those of the WT mice. When the EC-hLpL transgenes were crossed onto the Lpl–/– background, only line H allowed for survival; line L embryos were found in expected numbers but did not survive. The TG levels in EC-hLpLH/Lpl–/– mice were only mildly increased compared with that in Lpl+/– mice (Table). No significant changes were observed in cholesterol levels on the Lpl+/– and Lpl–/– background mice. The remaining experiments were all performed using the EC-hLpLH line.

VLDL Metabolism in EC-hLpL Mice
To determine how endothelial LpL altered VLDL metabolism in tissues, a kinetic study was performed comparing EC-hLpL/Lpl–/– and Lpl+/– mice using double-labeled VLDL to assessed tissue uptake of hydrolyzable lipid (TG) and nonhydrolyzable core cholesteryl ether. In all high LpL-expressing tissues (heart, skeletal muscle, and adipose), more TG than cholesteryl ether was, as expected, assimilated. Aortic uptake was below the level of detection in this study. Although the ratio of TG/cholesteryl ether uptake was slightly increased in heart, skeletal muscle, and white adipose tissue in EC-hLpL/Lpl–/– compared with Lpl+/– mice, these increases were not significant (supplemental Figure IV). Thus, endothelial cell expression of LpL and lack of parenchymal LpL expression did not lead to changes in tissue lipid uptake.

Vascular Gene Expression and Vascular Function in EC-hLPL
We next studied the role of LpL on vascular gene expression and endothelial function under control and inflammatory conditions. VCAM-1, a gene that has been reported to be regulated by LpL actions,14 was expressed at equal levels in WT and EC-hLpL aortas. However, after animals were treated with TNF-{alpha}, VCAM-1 gene expression was greater in aortas of EC-hLpL mice (Figure 3). E-selectin and endogenous TNF-{alpha}, but not ICAM-1 and MCP-1, mRNA levels were also increased. It has been suggested that FAs regulate PAI-1 expression4,27 and endothelial vasodilatation.28 Aortic PAI-1 mRNA levels were low and no differences could be detected between WT and EC-hLpL mice, even after TNF-{alpha} treatment.


Figure 3
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Effect of TNF-{alpha} treatment on aortic gene expression. Male mice were treated with PBS or TNF-{alpha} (25 µg/kg body weight), and aortas were harvested 4 hours later. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed for mRNA expression of VCAM-I, E-selectin, TNF-{alpha}, ICAM-1, MCP-1, and PAI-1. Values are expressed as means±SE. (n=4). *P<0.05.

Aortas from TNF-{alpha}–treated control and EC-hLpL mice were stained for VCAM-1 and E-selectin. Although after the TNF-{alpha} treatment robust staining was found in all vessels, quantification showed greater VCAM-1 staining intensity in the EC-hLpL vessels (supplemental Figure V).

Femoral arteries were obtained from control and TNF-{alpha}–treated mice; under control conditions, relaxation in response to increasing concentration of acetylcholine was unaltered. However, after TNF-{alpha} treatment, relaxation was reduced in arteries from EC-hLpL mice relative to that of the WT (Figure 4A). Similarly, arteries from EC-hLpL/Lpl–/– mice had reduced dilatation compared with Lpl+/– (Figure 4B). Relaxation induced by the NO donor, sodium nitroprusside, was similar for WT and EC-hLpL arteries (Figure 4C and 4D), indicating that the relaxation defect was not attributable to the inability of smooth muscle to respond to NO.


Figure 4
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Vasodilatation of femoral arteries from TNF-{alpha}–treated WT, EC-hLpL, and EC-hLpL/Lpl–/– mice. Acetylcholine-ind- uced relaxation and sodium nitroprusside- induced relaxation of phenylephrine precontracted femoral arteries. A and C, TNF-{alpha}–treated WT (open circle) and EC-hLpL (filled circle) mice. (n=5). *P<0.05. B and D, TNF-{alpha}–treated Lpl+/– (open square) and EC-hLPL/Lpl–/– (filled square) mice. (n=5). *P<0.05, **P<0.01.

To determine whether the differences in artery relaxation could be attributable to changes in NO production associated with reduced eNOS activity, arterial eNOS protein was analyzed by Western blot. Although monomeric eNOS was not altered, the amount of homodimer was reduced in arteries from EC-hLpL/Lpl–/– mice compared with Lpl+/– mice (Figure 5). This result suggests that the dysfunction in isolated EC-hLPL/Lpl–/– arteries was due to reduction of NO production.


Figure 5
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. eNOS protein expression in femoral arteries of TNF-{alpha}–treated EC-hLpL/Lpl–/– and Lpl+/– mice. eNOS dimer and monomer determined by Western blot.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
LpL is expressed in many cells and organs including heart, skeletal muscle, adipose, kidney, brain, and macrophages. It is concentrated on the luminal surface of endothelial cells, but also found on both adipocyte and myocyte cell surfaces.29 Thus, it is possible that this enzyme functions in a different manner depending on its location. Most importantly, a number of in vitro studies have suggested that high local concentrations of FA, including FAs generated by LpL hydrolysis of TG, modulate endothelial function and gene expression. By expressing LpL in endothelial cells we were able to study this directly and in vivo. Our data show the following: (1) The Tie2 promoter-enhancer can direct expression of LpL in endothelial cells. (2) Enzymatically active LpL can be produced by endothelial cells in vivo. (3) Endothelial cell LpL, without parenchymal cell LpL, is sufficient to rescue the neonatal demise of LpL knockout mice. (4) In the heart and other tissues, Tie2-expression of LpL, alone, leads to normal TG-derived FA uptake. In addition, uptake of nonhydrolyzable core lipid, represented by cholesteryl ether, was not reduced. (5) Under control conditions, EC-hLpL did not alter endothelial cell gene expression; however, in the presence of TNF-{alpha} some inflammatory genes had enhanced expression. (6) Arterial dilatation in the presence of TNF-{alpha} was reduced in the EC-hLpL transgenic mice. This suggests that high local concentrations of de novo generated FAs lead to vascular dysfunction.

Using the Tie2 promoter-enhancer system, we created mice that expressed LpL in endothelial cells. By isolating endothelial cells, this gene expression was confirmed. Lungs and aortas expressed relatively high levels of hLpL mRNA. The organ expression profile of the two lines of mice differed, and this difference likely reflected the phenotypes found. Of interest, female mice from the lower expressing line developed fatty livers (supplemental Figure III). This line of mice had relatively greater hepatic than peripheral LpL expression (Figure 1C). Thus, as we had noted previously,30 LpL-mediated diversion of plasma lipids into the liver can lead to steatosis.

Endothelial cell expression of hLpL reduced plasma TG in both lines of transgenics compared with WT; this was the expected phenotype and proved that the EC-hLpL transgene created enzymatically active LpL. The higher expressing line also rescued the knockout mice from neonatal demise, another proof that the enzyme was active in vivo. In contrast, although some pups were born and survived to 1 week, no lower expressing EC-hLpL transgenic mice survived to weaning. The reasons for the demise of the Lpl–/– mice are not obvious. However, previous studies found that neonatal Lpl–/– pups have very low levels of plasma glucose30 and, we assume, die from hypoglycemia. It is likely that EC-hLpLL mice did not produce sufficient FAs to prevent this.

One objective of this study and of previous experiments was to determine whether parenchymal cell- and endothelial cell-associated LpL have different roles in tissue lipid uptake. Mice with cardiomyocyte expression of anchored LpL have dilated cardiomyopathy and increased heart lipids, primarily cholesterol and cholesteryl ester but not TG.31 This suggested that LpL on parenchymal cells was more important for core lipid uptake than TG hydrolysis. However, EC-hLpL/Lpl–/– mouse hearts did not have more VLDL TG-derived FA than cholesteryl ether uptake than did WT hearts (supplemental Figure IV). Therefore, endothelial expressed LpL allowed core lipid uptake attributable to either of 2 processes: (1) selective uptake of lipid,32 or (2) migration and association with underlying cardiomyocytes.

Although both FAs and lysolecithin have been shown in vitro to have potentially toxic effects on endothelial cells,2,33,34 others have suggested that LpL-mediated lipolysis14 or LpL alone16 may be antiinflammatory. Whether these conditions mimic those that occur in vivo is unknown. We were, at first, surprised that under control conditions arterial gene expression did not differ between control and EC-hLpL mice; genes for PAI-1, VCAM-1, ICAM-1, and MCP-1 were not altered in vessels expressing excess LpL. In contrast to some in vitro studies, TNF-{alpha}–treated EC-hLpL mice had increased VCAM-1 expression in aortas (Figure 3). It may well be that the levels of baseline lipolysis or the presence of free FAs associated with albumin dampen the effects of excess lipolysis on gene expression in vivo such that FA effects are only found in the "stressed" TNF{alpha}–treated animals.

Because changes in endothelial cell exposure to FAs altered eNOS activity in vitro35 we assessed vascular reactivity in WT and EC-hLpL mice. After TNF-{alpha} treatment, isolated femoral arteries from EC-hLpL mice had reduced acetylcholine-induced vasodilatation. Vasodilatation in response to sodium nitroprusside was identical in the EC-hLpL–expressing and WT vessels. Therefore, the arteries were able to respond normally to an exogenous source of NO. EC-hLpL/Lpl–/– mice also showed similar endothelial dysfunction.

Under normal conditions, NO released by eNOS causes vasodilatation.36 For eNOS to function, it must be an active dimer.37,38 In EC-hLpL/Lpl–/– femoral arteries, eNOS dimer formation was reduced and this is likely to have created NO deficiency. Excess reactive oxygen species formation inhibits eNOS activity.39 We postulate that endothelial LpL increases local FA levels and augments reactive oxygen species production. FA treatment of cultured endothelial cells leads to reduced eNOS activity.5 This might mimic conditions that occur in diabetic arteries that, at least in experimental models, have impaired NO mediated endothelium-dependent vasodilatation associated with reduced eNOS dimers.40

In humans higher FA levels are positively correlated with vascular disease34; these elevations are attributable to systemic factors such as obesity and diabetes. Although total plasma FA levels were not increased in the EC-hLpL mice, increased lipolysis along the endothelial surface especially in the aorta is likely to have occurred. There is no obvious way to prove this in vivo. Excess FAs along with reduced eNOS could be atherogenic. Studies are ongoing to assess whether the EC-hLpL transgene alters vascular disease in atherosclerosis-prone hyperlipidemic mice.

In summary, we created mice with endothelial-specific expression of LpL. Unlike myocytes and adipocytes, endothelial cells do not normally express this enzyme; however, our data show that they are capable of LpL production. If produced in sufficient amounts, endothelial cell LpL can prevent the early neonatal demise of LpL-deficient mice. Most of the many gene expression changes that one might expect with increased local lipolysis were not found in these animals. Only in the presence of an inflammatory stimulus, TNF-{alpha}, was arterial dysfunction evident. VCAM-1 expression was increased and there was impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilatation. Thus, arterial responses to FAs might only be defective in the setting of vascular activation. Such conditions occur commonly and are thought to underlie the advanced vascular disease seen with diabetes, dyslipidemia, and cigarette smoking.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Sources of Funding

These studies were supported by grants HL45095 and 73029 from NHLBI and a mentored postdoctoral research grant from the American Diabetes Association (to M.Y.).

Disclosures

None.


*    Footnotes
 
M.T. and Y.H. contributed equally to this study.

Original received August 3, 2007; final version accepted December 4, 2007.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Carmena R, Duriez P, Fruchart JC. Atherogenic lipoprotein particles in atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2004; 109: III2–III7.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Kume N, Cybulsky MI, Gimbrone MA Jr. Lysophosphatidylcholine, a component of atherogenic lipoproteins, induces mononuclear leukocyte adhesion molecules in cultured human and rabbit arterial endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1992; 90: 1138–1144.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. De Caterina R, Libby P. Control of endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecules by fatty acids. Lipids. 1996; 31 Suppl: S57–S63.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Nilsson L, Banfi C, Diczfalusy U, Tremoli E, Hamsten A, Eriksson P. Unsaturated fatty acids increase plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 expression in endothelial cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998; 18: 1679–1685.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Du X, Edelstein D, Obici S, Higham N, Zou MH, Brownlee M. Insulin resistance reduces arterial prostacyclin synthase and eNOS activities by increasing endothelial fatty acid oxidation. J Clin Invest. 2006; 116: 1071–1080.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Williams KJ, Fless GM, Petrie KA, Snyder ML, Brocia RW, Swenson TL. Mechanisms by which lipoprotein lipase alters cellular metabolism of lipoprotein(a), low density lipoprotein, and nascent lipoproteins. Roles for low density lipoprotein receptors and heparan sulfate proteoglycans. J Biol Chem. 1992; 267: 13284–13292.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Rumsey SC, Obunike JC, Arad Y, Deckelbaum RJ, Goldberg IJ. Lipoprotein lipase-mediated uptake and degradation of low density lipoproteins by fibroblasts and macrophages. J Clin Invest. 1992; 90: 1504–1512.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Mulder M, Lombardi P, Jansen H, van Berkel TJ, Frants RR, Havekes LM. Low density lipoprotein receptor internalizes low density and very low density lipoproteins that are bound to heparan sulfate proteoglycans via lipoprotein lipase. J Biol Chem. 1993; 268: 9369–9375.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Babaev VR, Fazio S, Gleaves LA, Carter KJ, Semenkovich CF, Linton MF. Macrophage lipoprotein lipase promotes foam cell formation and atherosclerosis in vivo. J Clin Invest. 1999; 103: 1697–1705.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Renier G, Skamene E, DeSanctis JB, Radzioch D. Induction of tumor necrosis factor alpha gene expression by lipoprotein lipase. J Lipid Res. 1994; 35: 271–278.[Abstract]

11. Mamputu JC, Desfaits AC, Renier G. Lipoprotein lipase enhances human monocyte adhesion to aortic endothelial cells. J Lipid Res. 1997; 38: 1722–1729.[Abstract]

12. Saxena U, Kulkarni NM, Ferguson E, Newton RS. Lipoprotein lipase-mediated lipolysis of very low density lipoproteins increases monocyte adhesion to aortic endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992; 189: 1653–1658.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Yin B, Loike JD, Kako Y, Weinstock PH, Breslow JL, Silverstein SC, Goldberg IJ. Lipoprotein lipase regulates Fc receptor-mediated phagocytosis by macrophages maintained in glucose-deficient medium. J Clin Invest. 1997; 100: 649–657.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Ziouzenkova O, Perrey S, Asatryan L, Hwang J, MacNaul KL, Moller DE, Rader DJ, Sevanian A, Zechner R, Hoefler G, Plutzky J. Lipolysis of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins generates PPAR ligands: evidence for an antiinflammatory role for lipoprotein lipase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100: 2730–2735.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Chawla A, Lee CH, Barak Y, He W, Rosenfeld J, Liao D, Han J, Kang H, Evans RM. PPARdelta is a very low-density lipoprotein sensor in macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100: 1268–1273.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Kota RS, Ramana CV, Tenorio FA, Enelow RI, Rutledge JC. Differential effects of lipoprotein lipase on tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interferon-gamma-mediated gene expression in human endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2005; 280: 31076–31084.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Schlaeger TM, Bartunkova S, Lawitts JA, Teichmann G, Risau W, Deutsch U, Sato TN. Uniform vascular-endothelial-cell-specific gene expression in both embryonic and adult transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94: 3058–3063.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Levak-Frank S, Radner H, Walsh A, Stollberger R, Knipping G, Hoefler G, Sattler W, Weinstock PH, Breslow JL, Zechner R. Muscle-specific overexpression of lipoprotein lipase causes a severe myopathy characterized by proliferation of mitochondria and peroxisomes in transgenic mice. J Clin Invest. 1995; 96: 976–986.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Walsh A, Ito Y, Breslow JL. High levels of human apolipoprotein A-I in transgenic mice result in increased plasma levels of small high density lipoprotein (HDL) particles comparable to human HDL3. J Biol Chem. 1989; 264: 6488–6494.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Weinstock PH, Bisgaier CL, Aalto-Setala K, Radner H, Ramakrishnan R, Levak-Frank S, Essenburg AD, Zechner R, Breslow JL. Severe hypertriglyceridemia, reduced high density lipoprotein, and neonatal death in lipoprotein lipase knockout mice. Mild hypertriglyceridemia with impaired very low density lipoprotein clearance in heterozygotes. J Clin Invest. 1995; 96: 2555–2568.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Hocquette JF, Graulet B, Olivecrona T. Lipoprotein lipase activity and mRNA levels in bovine tissues. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 1998; 121: 201–212.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Peterson J, Fujimoto WY, Brunzell JD. Human lipoprotein lipase: relationship of activity, heparin affinity, and conformation as studied with monoclonal antibodies. J Lipid Res. 1992; 33: 1165–1170.[Abstract]

23. Nilsson-Ehle P, Schotz MC. A stable, radioactive substrate emulsion for assay of lipoprotein lipase. J Lipid Res. 1976; 17: 536–541.[Abstract]

24. Docherty CC, Kalmar-Nagy J, Engelen M, Nathanielsz PW. Development of fetal vascular responses to endothelin-1 and acetylcholine in the sheep. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2001; 280: R554–R562.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Anwar MA, Docherty C, Poston L, Nathanielsz PW. A comparative study of vascular responsiveness of myometrial and omental small resistance arteries in late-gestation sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 181: 663–668.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Klatt P, Schmidt K, Lehner D, Glatter O, Bachinger HP, Mayer B. Structural analysis of porcine brain nitric oxide synthase reveals a role for tetrahydrobiopterin and L-arginine in the formation of an SDS-resistant dimer. Embo J. 1995; 14: 3687–3695.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Chen Y, Sobel BE, Schneider DJ. Effect of fatty acid chain length and thioesterification on the augmentation of expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2002; 12: 325–330.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Tripathy D, Mohanty P, Dhindsa S, Syed T, Ghanim H, Aljada A, Dandona P. Elevation of free fatty acids induces inflammation and impairs vascular reactivity in healthy subjects. Diabetes. 2003; 52: 2882–2887.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Goldberg IJ. Lipoprotein lipase and lipolysis: central roles in lipoprotein metabolism and atherogenesis. J Lipid Res. 1996; 37: 693–707.[Abstract]

30. Merkel M, Weinstock PH, Chajek-Shaul T, Radner H, Yin B, Breslow JL, Goldberg IJ. Lipoprotein lipase expression exclusively in liver. A mouse model for metabolism in the neonatal period and during cachexia. J Clin Invest. 1998; 102: 893–901.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Yagyu H, Chen G, Yokoyama M, Hirata K, Augustus A, Kako Y, Seo T, Hu Y, Lutz EP, Merkel M, Bensadoun A, Homma S, Goldberg IJ. Lipoprotein lipase (LpL) on the surface of cardiomyocytes increases lipid uptake and produces a cardiomyopathy. J Clin Invest. 2003; 111: 419–426.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Seo T, Al-Haideri M, Treskova E, Worgall TS, Kako Y, Goldberg IJ, Deckelbaum RJ. Lipoprotein lipase-mediated selective uptake from low density lipoprotein requires cell surface proteoglycans and is independent of scavenger receptor class B type 1. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 30355–30362.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Morimoto M, Kume N, Miyamoto S, Ueno Y, Kataoka H, Minami M, Hayashida K, Hashimoto N, Kita T. Lysophosphatidylcholine induces early growth response factor-1 expression and activates the core promoter of PDGF-A chain in vascular endothelial cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001; 21: 771–776.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Sattar N, Petrie JR, Jaap AJ. The atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype and vascular endothelial dysfunction. Atherosclerosis. 1998; 138: 229–235.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

35. Huang PL. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase and endothelial dysfunction. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2003; 5: 473–480.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

36. Munzel T, Daiber A, Ullrich V, Mulsch A. Vascular consequences of endothelial nitric oxide synthase uncoupling for the activity and expression of the soluble guanylyl cyclase and the cGMP-dependent protein kinase. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005; 25: 1551–1557.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Leber A, Hemmens B, Klosch B, Goessler W, Raber G, Mayer B, Schmidt K. Characterization of recombinant human endothelial nitric-oxide synthase purified from the yeast Pichia pastoris. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274: 37658–37664.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Nathan C, Xie QW. Nitric oxide synthases: roles, tolls, and controls. Cell. 1994; 78: 915–918.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

39. Zou MH, Shi C, Cohen RA. Oxidation of the zinc-thiolate complex and uncoupling of endothelial nitric oxide synthase by peroxynitrite. J Clin Invest. 2002; 109: 817–826.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

40. Molnar J, Yu S, Mzhavia N, Pau C, Chereshnev I, Dansky HM. Diabetes induces endothelial dysfunction but does not increase neointimal formation in high-fat diet fed C57BL/6J mice. Circ Res. 2005; 96: 1178–1184.[Abstract/Free Full Text]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Additional Materials
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/3/455    most recent
ATVBAHA.107.153239v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, I. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, I. J.