| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brief Review |
From the Rudolf Virchow Center (D.V.-S., I.P., B.N.), DFG-Research Center for Experimental Biomedicine and the Institute of Clinical Biochemistry and Pathobiochemistry (B.N.), University of Würzburg, Germany.
Correspondence to Bernhard Nieswandt, PhD, Rudolf Virchow Center, DFG Research Center for Experimental Biomedicine, Zinklesweg 10, 97078 Würzburg, Germany. E-mail bernhard.nieswandt{at}virchow.uni.wuerzburg.de
Series Editor: Dietmar Vestweber
Vascular Adhesion Molecules
ATVB In Focus
Previous Brief Reviews in this Series:
van Buul JD, Kanters E, and Hordijk PL. Endothelial signaling by Ig-like cell adhesion molecules. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27:1870-1876.
Bradfield PF, Nourshargh S, Aurrand-Lions M, Imhof BA. JAM family and related proteins in leukocyte migration. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27:2104-2112.
Galkina E and Ley K. Vascular adhesion molecules in atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27: 2292-2301.
Jalkanen S, Salmi M. VAP-1 and CD73, endothelial cell surface enzymes in leukocyte extravasation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008;28:18–26.
Vestweber, D. VE-cadharin: the major endothelial adhesion molecule controlling cellular junctions and blood vessel formation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008;28:223–232.
| Abstract |
|---|
At sites of vascular injury, platelets attach to the exposed extracellular matrix by a complex series of events involving different receptors and their signaling pathways, most notably the vWF receptor GPIb-V-IX and the collagen receptor GPVI, which induce the activation of β1 and β3 integrins and subsequent firm adhesion.
Key Words: adhesion receptors platelet thrombosis activation
| Introduction |
|---|
|
The adhesive properties of platelets have to be tightly regulated to ensure that the cells readily become activated under appropriate conditions to prevent blood loss in cases of vascular injury, while at the same time undesired adhesion, which can lead to thrombotic events, has to be avoided. Platelets, which have evolved relatively late during evolution and which are only found in mammals, possess various adhesion receptors and a sophisticated regulatory machinery to adhere in response to a well-defined set of stimuli. This makes platelets a very instructive model for the cellular mechanisms underlying regulated adhesion. Their central role in ischemic cardio- and cerebrovascular diseases has made the signaling mechanisms and membrane proteins mediating platelet adhesion prime targets for drugs used to treat and prevent arterial thrombosis. A comprehensive discussion of the mechanisms that regulate platelet adhesion and current areas of debate is far beyond the scope of this review. Rather, we focus on the principal receptors that mediate platelet adhesion and aggregation on the damaged vessel wall, the majority of which is exclusively expressed in platelets/megakaryocytes. It is important to note, however, that under pathological conditions platelets can also adhere to the intact activated vascular endothelium by processes involving endothelial as well as platelet P-selectin,3 its ligand P-selectin glycoprotein ligand (PSGL)-1,4 as well as GPIb,5 and thereby contribute to inflammatory processes by facilitating EC activation and leukocyte recuitment.5–7 The mechanisms underlying platelet-EC interaction in inflammation and atherosclerosis have recently been reviewed by Lindemann et al8 and will not be discussed in detail here.
The first step in the hemostatic cascade is platelet interaction with the exposed ECM which contains a large number of adhesive macromolecules, such as laminin, fibronectin, collagens, and vWF. The mechanisms of platelet adhesion at sites of injury are to a large extent determined by the prevailing rheological conditions. Blood flows with a greater velocity in the center of the vessel than near the wall, thereby generating shear forces between adjacent layers of fluid that become maximal at the wall. The drag, which opposes platelet adhesion and aggregation, increases with the prevailing shear rates. Under conditions of high shear, such as is found in small arteries and arterioles, the initial tethering of platelets to the ECM is mediated by the interaction between the platelet receptor glycoprotein (GP)Ib and vWF bound to collagen. Although mandatory at high shear, this interaction may not be relevant under conditions of low shear as found in veins and large arteries.9 The binding of GPIb to vWF has a fast off-rate and is therefore insufficient to mediate stable adhesion but rather maintains the platelet in close contact with the surface, although it continuously translocates in the direction of blood flow. During this "rolling," platelets establish contacts with the thrombogenic ECM protein collagen through the immunoglobulin superfamily receptor, GPVI. While GPVI binds collagen with low affinity and thus is unable to mediate adhesion by itself, it triggers intracellular signals that shift platelet integrins to a high-affinity state and induce the release of the secondary mediators adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and thromboxane A2 (TXA2). These agonists together with locally produced thrombin contribute to cellular activation by stimulating receptors that couple to heterotrimeric G proteins (Gq, G12/G13, Gi), which induce different signaling events and act synergistically to induce full platelet activation (Figure 2). Under conditions, when high concentrations of these soluble agonists are present, this may be sufficient to mediate platelet activation independently of GPVI, as shown experimentally in a model of laser-induced arterial injury in mice, where thrombus formation occurs independently of collagen receptors.10 The mechanisms of G protein–mediated platelet activation have recently been summarized in an excellent review by Offermanns11 and will not be discussed here.
|
Firm adhesion to the ECM is mediated by high-affinity β1 integrins which bind to collagen (
2β1), fibronectin (
5β1), and laminin (
6β1), as well as the major platelet integrin,
IIbβ3, interacting with fibronectin and collagen-bound vWF. In the following, the function of these individual receptors and their ligands will be discussed in more detail.
| vWF |
|---|
IIbβ3.12 vWF is found in the Weibel-Palade bodies of endothelial cells, in the
-granules of platelets, and in the plasma at a concentration of approximately 10 µg/mL in humans.13 The mature subunit of vWF consists of 2050 amino acids and is composed of 4 different repeating domains (A–D).14 The 3 homologous A domains span residues 497 to 1111 and regulate interaction with different receptors and prothrombotic ligands of the subendothelial matrix. The A1 domain exclusively binds collagen type VI, whereas collagen I and III are bound via the A3 domain.15 The C1 domain contains the sequence Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD), which represents a binding motif for both of the platelet β3-integrins, namely
IIbβ3 and
vβ3. The interaction between vWF and the receptor complex GPIb-V-IX occurs via the A1 domain and is of pivotal importance in the initial adhesion of platelets to the subendothelium under conditions of high shear,12 such as found in atherosclerotic vessels. Intracellularly assembled dimers of mature vWF subunits serve as constituents to build large multimers up to 20 MDa in molecular weight. The largest multimers with the greatest thrombogenic potential are stored in platelets and endothelial cells and get secreted on cellular activation or damage.16 Under normal conditions, soluble vWF does not undergo significant interactions with its platelet receptor, GPIb-V-IX. However, when immobilized on exposed collagen at sites of injury, it becomes a strong adhesive substrate. In vitro studies suggest that conformational changes in the A1 domain of vWF could alter its affinity for interaction partners.12 Ristocetin, a bacterial-derived antibiotic from Nocardia lurida and botrocetin, a viper venom protein from Bothrops jararaca, induce vWF/GPIb-V-IX interaction under static conditions, whereas under in vivo conditions, the vWF molecule might alter its conformation because of high shear forces and because of the immobilization on a surface. The absence of vWF in all compartments in humans causes severe defects in primary hemostasis and coagulation.17 Such vWF type 3 patients have strongly reduced factor VIII levels and suffer from spontaneous bleeding. A similar phenotype has also been reported for vWF knockout mice which display massively prolonged bleeding times and defective thrombus formation in vivo, emphasizing the importance of vWF in hemostasis and thrombosis.18 However, in contrast to GPIb, vWF appears not to be essential for thrombus formation in vivo, as much delayed adhesion still occurs even under arterial flow conditions, indicating that GPIb can initiate adhesion by interacting with other ligands. One of the strongest candidates is thrombospondin-1, which has been shown to interact with GPIb under high shear flow conditions in vitro.19
| The GPIb-V-IX Complex |
|---|
- and β-subunits of GPIb, GPIX, and GPV,21 all of which belong to the leucine-rich repeat protein superfamily and are characterized by the presence of 1 or more leucine-rich repeats.13 GPIb
(135 kDa), which represents the major functional subunit of the receptor complex, is linked by disulphide bonds to 2 GPIbβ subunits (25 kDa). GPIX (22 kDa) and GPV (88 kDa) are noncovalently associated, resulting in an overall receptor stochiometry of 2:4:2:1.13,22 The N-terminal extracellular part of GPIb
consists of 8 LLRs and contains the binding domains for most interaction partners of the receptor complex, namely vWF, Mac-1, P-selectin, thrombin, high molecular weight kininogen (HMWK), and factor XII (for review see ref. 13). The C-terminal cytoplasmic tail of GPIb
is composed of 96 amino acids and contains binding sites for putative signaling molecules, such as actin-binding protein and 14-3-3
.23
In humans, lack or dysfunction of GPIb-V-IX has been associated with the Bernard-Soulier syndrome (BSS), a congenital bleeding disorder characterized by mild thrombocytopenia, giant platelets, and inability of the cells to aggregate in response to ristocetin.24 Similarly, mice deficient in GPIb
25 or GPIbβ26 lack the entire receptor complex and reflect human BSS, as they display a severe bleeding phenotype and macrothrombocytopenia. Whereas the macrothrombocytopenia appears to be related to alterations in the cytoplasmic tail of GPIb
,27 increased bleeding is attributed to the lack of the extracellular domain of GPIb
.13 In contrast to GPIb and GPIX, the lack of GPV does not cause a BSS-like phenotype as no mutations within the GPV gene have been described in BSS patients,24 and mice deficient in this subunit produce rather normal platelets and show only very minor alterations in hemostasis.28,29
GPIb -Mediated Tethering on vWF
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
and the A1 domain of vWf immobilized on collagen or on the surface of activated platelets is crucial for the initial tethering (or capture) of flowing platelets.9 This interaction is, however, characterized by a rapid dissociation rate and is insufficient for stable adhesion. This can be illustrated by the rolling of GPIb-IX–expressing cells or platelets on a vWf monolayer at high shear.9 Thus, the principal function of GPIb-V-IX is to recruit platelets to the site of injury and to reduce their velocity to enable the interaction of other receptors with the thrombogenic surface. It is not entirely clear how the interaction between GPIb
and vWF is regulated but this process appears to involve conformational changes in both the receptor and the ligand (recently reviewed in ref. 30). Furthermore, phosphorylation of serine 166 of the GPIbβ subunit may negatively regulate vWF binding by the GPIb-V-IX complex.31
Besides its mandatory function as an adhesion receptor, increasing evidence suggests that GPIb-V-IX also acts as signal transducer that has the capacity to activate integrin
IIbβ3 and thereby facilitates firm adhesion of the cells independently of "classical" activatory receptors, such as G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) or GPVI (see below). It has been proposed that GPIb-V-IX may be involved in immunoreceptor tyrosine activation motif (ITAM) signaling based on the observation that the receptor complex is recruited to lipid rafts,32 where it may interact with GPVI33 and induce phosphorylation of the Fc receptor (FcR)
-chain associated ITAM.34 This could not, however, be confirmed in other studies.35 Others have proposed that GPIb signaling may occur through the association with proteins, such as 14-3-3
, Src kinases, calmodulin, and PI3-kinase.36–38 Recently, adhesion and degranulation promoting adaptor protein (ADAP) was identified as a component of integrin inside-out signaling pathways induced by vWF/GPIb-V-IX and other agonists independent of the FcR
-chain, indicating complementary integrin
IIbβ3 activation by GPVI and GPIb-V-IX.39 Despite these observations the vWF/GPIb-V-IX axis is generally considered to be a very weak agonist based on the observation that rolling of platelets on a vWf surface may last for several minutes until
IIbβ3-mediated stable adhesion (via vWf) is seen.40
The specific requirement for GPIb-vWF interaction under conditions of high shear, such as found in diseased arteries, makes it a potentially attractive target for the pharmacological inhibition of pathological thrombus formation in the setting of precipitate diseases such as myocardial infarction or stroke. In line with this, the inhibition of the vWF binding site of GPIb
by Fab fragments of the inhibitory antibody p0p/B abolished platelet tethering and subsequent thrombus formation at sites of arterial injury in mice.41 In addition, it was shown that arterial thrombus formation is abrogated in mice expressing GPIb
, in which the extracellular domain is replaced by that of the human interleukin (IL)-4 receptor,42 confirming the mandatory role of GPIb for adhesion and thrombus formation under arterial flow conditions. Although anti-GPIb
treatment results in prolonged bleeding times, this does not necessarily translate into an increased bleeding risk. This has only very recently been revealed in a model of ischemic stroke in mice, where anti-GPIb
Fab fragments (p0p/B) profoundly protected the animals from the development of ischemic brain infarcts but did not increase the incidence of intracranial bleeding compared with control.43 An alternative approach to interfere with GPIb-V-IX function could arise from the observation that GPIb
can be down-regulated from the platelet surface by the membrane-expressed sheddase, a disintegrin and metalloproteinase 17 (ADAM17).44 The potential of GPIb-V-IX as an antithrombotic target has recently been reviewed by Vanhoorelbeke et al.45
| Platelet Collagen Receptors |
|---|
IIbβ3, which interact with collagen via vWF,9 several collagen receptors have been identified on the platelet surface, most notably the immunoglobulin superfamily member GPVI and integrin
2β1.48,49 The relative contribution of these 2 receptors to platelet-collagen interactions has been intensively debated in the literature. It is now widely accepted that although GPVI serves as an activatory receptor that is essential for platelet activation and aggregation on collagen, integrin
2β1 contributes to firm adhesion and only makes minor contribution to cellular activation.48 | GPVI |
|---|
(FcR
) chain, the ITAM-bearing signal transducing subunit also complexed with a variety of immune receptors.52,53 The GPVI cytosolic tail contains a proline-rich motif that binds selectively to the SH3 domain of the Src family tyrosine kinases, Fyn, and Lyn. Crosslinking of GPVI by ligand binding brings Fyn and Lyn into contact with the FcR
-chain, resulting in tyrosine phosphorylation of the ITAM.54,55 The tyrosine kinase Syk then binds to the phosphorylated tyrosine via its SH2 domain and thereby becomes autophosphorylated and activated. Activated Syk, in turn, initiates a signaling cascade that is thought to take place in cholesterol-rich membrane domains known as lipid rafts and involves the formation of a "signalosome" containing the adaptors LAT and SLP-76 as well as effector proteins, most notably phospholipase (PL)C
2, phosphoinositide-3 (PI-3) kinase, and small G proteins.56 PLC
2 subsequently induces the formation of the second messengers 1,2-diacylglycerol (DAG) and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3). DAG activates protein kinase (PK) C, whereas IP3 induces the release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores and subsequent Ca2+ entry resulting in an increase in cytosolic Ca2+ concentrations. A very recent study suggests that store-operated Ca2+ entry may play a particular role in this process.57 GPVI-mediated signaling results in strong integrin activation and release of stored mediators, which play a central role for thrombus growth (see below).11,48 GPVI-ITAM signaling can be inhibited by immunoreceptor tyrosine-base inhibition motif (ITIM)-coupled receptors. In platelets, ITIM receptors activate the cytoplasmic tyrosine phosphatases SHP1 and SHP2, thereby inhibiting activation of PLC
2.58 The major ITIM-containing receptor on the platelet surface is PECAM-1 (CD31) (10.000 copies per cell), which significantly inhibits GPVI signaling, but is also involved in the negative regulation of signals generated by G protein–coupled receptors and the GPIb-V-IX complex.59 PECAM-1 is very highly expressed on endothelial cells (1 million copies per cell) and becomes activated by binding to itself, indicating an important role in the prevention of platelet activation on the endothelial surface. However, the inhibitory function of PECAM-1 has been questioned by recent studies showing that PECAM-1 had only a minor inhibitory effect on platelet activation induced by ITAM signaling and that thrombus formation on collagen was not altered if PECAM-1 was absent.60 Furthermore, Wee et al reported even potentiation of aggregation in PECAM-1–/– platelets in response to CRP,61 suggesting that further experiments will be needed to address these discrepancies.
No patient with a genetic deficiency in GPVI has been reported to date. However, a few GPVI-deficient patients have been described who had anti-GPVI antibodies in their blood which was difficult to explain.62,63 A likely explanation for this observation comes from studies in mice showing that injection of an anti-GPVI antibody (JAQ1) into mice results in a downregulation of the receptor from the platelet surface and a GPVI knockout-like phenotype for a prolonged time period.64 Such GPVI-depleted platelets are not activatable by collagen and do not firmly adhere to the immobilized protein under high or low shear flow conditions and the same is seen with platelets from FcR
-chain–deficient mice, which also lack GPVI. Although the initial tethering and rolling still occurs through the interaction of GPIb with collagen-bound vWF, the transition to stable adhesion is defective because of the lack of integrin activation.50,63 Direct activation of integrins by Mn2+ or the addition of agonists, which activate integrins via inside-out signaling, such as ADP, can restore adhesion of such platelets. Mice genetically engineered to lack GPVI later confirmed the essential role of this receptor for collagen-induced platelet activation and spreading on the matrix protein,65,66 although in one study initial adhesion of GPVI-deficient platelets to collagen was detected.65 Mice lacking the GPVI/FcR
-chain complex do not exhibit a major bleeding phenotype but they are profoundly protected from experimental arterial thrombosis. At sites of arterial injury markedly reduced platelet attachment and thrombus formation has been observed in FcR
-chain–deficient,67 GPVI-depleted,41 or GPVI-deficient68 mice. Thus, GPVI is crucial for stable platelet adhesion on collagen surfaces or the ECM, but the receptor is, similar to GPIb-V-IX, unable to mediate this adhesion by itself. Rather, together with GPCRs stimulated by locally produced or released agonists, it mediates cellular activation and the shift of platelet integrins from low to high affinity states, thereby allowing firm adhesion and thrombus growth. Shear-resistant platelet attachment on collagen requires the binding of integrins, notably
2β1 and
IIbβ3, which directly or indirectly (via vWf) bind to the matrix protein, respectively.
| Integrins |
|---|
- and a smaller β-subunit which are noncovalently linked to each other and are type I transmembrane proteins. Both subunits consist of a large N-terminal extracellular domain which in the heterodimeric state of the integrin form a globular head, a single transmembrane domain and a short cytoplasmic tail domain. Integrins are supposed to be expressed in a low affinity state on the surface of resting platelets and will turn into a high affinity state following platelet activation, a process referred to as "inside-out" signaling. Ligand-occupied integrins on the other hand trigger various cellular processes, such as cell spreading, through "outside-in" signaling.70 Platelets express 3 different β1-integrins, namely
2β1 (collagen receptor),
5β1 (fibronectin receptor), and
6β1 (laminin receptor) as well as 2 β3-integrins,
IIbβ3 and
vβ3, the latter only being present in very low amounts. Among them, 2 are considered to be of pivotal importance for platelet adhesion and aggregation on the exposed subendothelial matrix:
2β1 and
IIbβ3.
Integrin 2β1
|
|---|
2β1 (also termed GPIa/IIa, VLA-2, or CD49b/CD29) was the first platelet collagen receptor to be identified and serves mainly as an adhesion receptor.49,71 It is present on the platelet surface with a copy number of approximately 2000 to 4000 and can bind to collagen types I, II, III, IV, and XI. The role of integrin
2β1 in hemostasis and thrombosis has been controversial for a long time. Early publications suggested the integrin to be the central platelet collagen receptor that is essential for shear-resistant adhesion to the ECM.72,73 However, studies on mice lacking either the
2- or the β1-subunit failed to show a major hemostatic defect,50,74,75 and it is now accepted that
2β1 plays a significant but not essential role for the adhesion process as other receptors, most notably integrin
IIbβ3, are also able to mediate shear-resistant platelet attachment to the ECM.9,50,76
2β1 is the only platelet surface receptor containing an I- (or A) domain77 that is placed between the 2nd and 3rd repeats of the seven-bladed β-propeller of the
2 subunit—most probably present as a protrusion—of the extracellular domain and serves as the primary ligand binding interface of the integrin.78 There is a metal coordination site integrated into the protruding I-domain. The binding of a Mg2+ ion to this site is critical for the recognition of a glutamate residue in the collagen molecule.79 Mutations affecting the upper surface of this domain caused loss of collagen binding under both static and flow conditions.80 The I-domain of the
2-subunit contacts the putative metal ion-dependent activation site (MIDAS) (or I-like) domain of the β1-subunit which is neighbored by a plexin-semaphorin-integrin (PSI) domain. The membrane-near extracellular region of β1 is rich in cysteine and disulphide bridges and is suggested to be responsible for conformational changes in the structure of the integrin on inside-out signaling.
Many integrins exist in low affinity states and require cellular activation to undergo a conformational change to efficiently bind their ligands, whereas other integrins have been shown to be constitutively present in a high affinity state. For a long time, platelet
2β1 was thought to belong to the latter group of integrins. An early model of platelet-collagen interactions, the so-called "2-step, 2-site" model incorporated the idea that platelets in a first step firmly bind to collagen via high affinity
2β1 allowing subsequent interaction of a second receptor leading to platelet activation.81 This second, low affinity receptor was later proposed to be GPVI. However, the idea that
2β1 is active on unstimulated platelets was first challenged by Moroi and coworkers who demonstrated that the affinity of the integrin for soluble collagen increases on cellular stimulation.82,83 This suggested that
2β1, like
IIbβ3 (see below), requires an agonist-induced conformational change (via inside-out signaling) to bind to collagen which was further confirmed by the analysis of GPVI-deficient murine platelets.48,50 The underlying "inside-out" signaling events are not clear at present but they might be similar to those regulating the affinity of integrin
IIbβ3 with talin binding as the final step (see below). Based on antibody binding studies, in the case of integrin
2β1 a third (so-called intermediate) conformation is suggested to exist, where the physiological ligand collagen can already bind, but antibodies specific for the high-affinity conformation cannot.84 A recent study that used an antibody that recognizes activation-induced conformational changes in
2β1 suggested that the activation of this integrin is dependent on the previous activation of
IIbβ3.85 However, the underlying mechanisms have not been identified and it remains to be determined whether the detected conformational changes indeed reflect "activation" of the integrin.
Inside-out activation of
2β1 can be induced through ligation of GPVI as demonstrated by defective adhesion of GPVI-deficient or -inhibited platelets to the matrix protein.50,63,66 Binding of
2β1 to collagen, on the other hand, contributes to cellular activation indirectly by reinforcing GPVI-collagen interactions and directly by a series of intracellular signaling events summarized as "outside-in" signaling. This is very similar to that induced by GPVI, including Src, Syk, SLP-76, and phospholipase (PL) C
2.48,86 Thus, although structurally unrelated, the 2 major collagen receptors share important signaling molecules and act in a cooperative manner, reinforcing each others activity.48,49,87 Similarly, recent elegant studies suggest that
2β1 and GPIb have partially overlapping functions and cooperatively mediate primary adhesion on collagen/vWF, reinforced by activation through GPVI.88 Thus, although minor species-specific differences may exist in the interplay between GPIb, GPVI, and
2β1 and the relative contribution of each of these receptors very much depends on the experimental conditions, it is now generally accepted that they act synergistically in the process of platelet adhesion, activation, and expression of procoagulant activity on the ECM. However, because the absence of
2β1 has been shown to have no or only minor protective effect in arterial thrombosis,76,89 inhibition of the integrin may be a less promising antithrombotic strategy than GPVI or GPIb inhibition.
Integrin IIbβ3
|
|---|
IIbβ3 (GPIIb/IIIa) is the most abundant glycoprotein on the platelet surface with a number of 60.000 to 80.000 copies per cell and an additional intracellular pool that is exposed on the surface on activation.70 The affinity of this integrin for its ligands, most notably fibrinogen, fibronectin, and vWF is highly modulatable, and on activation it mediates platelet adhesion, aggregation, and spreading on the exposed extracellular matrix of the injured vessel wall as well as pathological thrombus formation.70,90 Lack or dysfunction of
IIbβ3 gives rise to Glanzmann thrombastenia, a severe bleeding diathesis associated with impaired adhesion and abolished aggregation of platelets.91 Accordingly, mice lacking the β3integrin resemble the phenotype of Glanzmann thrombasthenia with absent platelet aggregation, reduced clot retraction and greatly reduced fibrinogen uptake into platelets.92 These mice have markedly prolonged tail bleeding times and display spontaneous hemorrhage in all developmental stages. In intravital microscopy studies performed in mesenteric arterioles, β3-null mice do not form any thrombi.93 The integrin heterodimer is formed by noncovalent coupling of the
IIb and the β3 subunit during megakaryopoiesis. The "head" domain of the molecule is formed by the 7-bladed β-propeller and thigh domain in the
-chain and by the I-like domain (or A-domain) and hybrid domains in the β-chain,94–96 and has a size of approximately 8x10 nm as determined by rotary shadowing electron microscopy.97,98 The extracellular part of the
subunit further contains a calf1 and a calf2 domain, whereas the β subunit contains a PSI, a β-tail, and 4 EGF-like domains.94–96 These domains form the L-shaped "stalk" which consists of a "neck" and "body" region. Molecular modeling of the transmembrane region by electron cryomicroscopy and x-ray crystallography suggests that the 2 subunits span the membrane forming an
-helical coiled-coil structure,96 and end in a C-terminal short intracellular tail.
Integrin
IIbβ3 binds several ligands each containing an arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) sequence, such as fibrinogen, fibrin, vWF, fibronectin, thrombospondin, and vitronectin. Arginine contacts the
-subunit β-propeller and aspartic acid—through a Mg2+—the MIDAS of the β-subunit I-like domain.95 In resting platelets, however, the integrin is in a "low-affinity" or "off" state, which is characterized by a highly bent conformation which keeps the binding site for the RGD sequence hidden. On agonist-induced platelet activation "inside-out" signaling events lead to a conformational switch, the integrin changes into the "high-affinity" or "on" state, and the RGD binding site becomes unmasked. This process called switchblade-like opening can be initiated also passively by manganese ions.99 The "inside-out" activation of
IIbβ3 seems to be regulated through a mechanism that essentially involves the cytoplasmic tails of the 2 subunits. A current model suggests that there is an important—probably charge-regulated—interaction between the cytoplasmic tails of the
- and β-subunits which keeps the integrin in the inactive state.100 Mutagenesis of the membrane-proximal parts of the cytoplasmic tails or deletion of it results in the permanent activation of
IIbβ3 supporting this hypothesis.101,102 It is hypothesized that during "inside-out" signaling the interaction between the subunits is broken up and that the cytoskeletal protein talin-1 is the final effector molecule of this process.100 Talin-1 (270 kDa) is an elongated flexible protein that can bind to the cytoplasmic tail of integrin β3 and can link it to actin through its actin binding site at the C-terminal region.103 The proposed central role of talin in the activation of
IIbβ3104 has very recently been confirmed by the analysis of platelets from mice with an induced talin-1 deficiency in platelets. These platelets fail to aggregate in response to all major agonists and display abolished adhesion to fibrinogen and collagen in vitro, the latter suggesting also defective activation of
2β1. In vivo, adhesion and thrombus formation at sites of vascular injury is abrogated (Figure 3) and the animals are unable to arrest bleeding.105 These results provide the first direct evidence that the regulation of β3 and β1 integrins in platelets occurs through similar pathways and may involve the same molecules. Furthermore, they demonstrate that
2β1 indeed requires inside-out activation to bind its ligand, collagen, and the same appears to be true for
5β1 and
6β1 (see below).
|
Once bound to its ligands,
IIbβ3 induces processes such as spreading and clot retraction and contributes to platelet procoagulant activity through "outside-in" signaling events.70 Recent data suggest that talin is also essential for this process to occur (Figure 3 and ref. 105), which stands in contrast to previous reports.106 In addition, the cytoplasmic tails of
IIb and β3 establish further functional connections with a number of signaling molecules. Subunit
IIb interacts with the chloride channel ICln,107 with the calcium- and integrin-binding protein (CIB),108 and with the catalytic subunit of protein phosphatase 1.109 The relevance of these interactions is, however, still unclear. More is known about the proteins interacting with the β3 cytoplasmic tail. Filamin,
-actinin, myosin, and skelemin are cytoskeletal proteins and are supposed to be involved in platelet spreading and clot retraction. The Src family kinases—after receptor recruitment—undergo tyrosine autophosphorylation at position 418110 and trigger a signaling cascade that regulates lamellipodia formation.111 Because of the importance of
IIbβ3 integrin in platelet aggregation it has become an attractive pharmacological target for the prevention of ischemic cardiovascular events. Strategies to inhibit its function include antibodies (abciximab), cyclic peptides adapted from a snake venom disintegrin (eptifibitide), and nonpeptide analogues of an RGD peptide (tirofiban and lamifiban) that inhibit ligand binding.112 Although these inhibitors have been beneficial for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, they do not have widespread clinical use because of their side effect of undesired bleeding.112
Integrins vβ3, 5β1, 6β1
|
|---|
IIbβ3 and
2β1) there are further integrins like
vβ3,
5β1 (or VLA-5), and
6β1 (or VLA-6) expressed on the platelet surface. The structure of the
- and β-subunits of these integrins resembles that of
IIb, although small differences exist.113,114 They bind different proteins in the ECM; vitronectin is the preferred ligand of
vβ3 which can, however, also bind fibronectin and osteopontin,
5β1 serves as a receptor for fibronectin, and
6β1 is the major laminin receptor on platelets.115 Although they are all well-established adhesion receptors, their role in platelet attachment at sites of vascular injury has not been assessed in much detail. Recent studies on
2- and β1-deficient mice suggest that integrin
5β1 and
6β1 significantly contribute to the adhesion process in vivo, but they seem to be not essential because of functional redundancy with integrin
IIbβ3.76 Furthermore, laminin-integrin
6β1 interactions have been reported to stimulate platelet spreading through GPVI.116 These observations indicate that these integrins may modulate platelet responses and that their relative importance to the overall processes of adhesion, activation, and spreading is determined by the nature of the exposed ECM, which may significantly differ between individual regions of the body and the type and severity of injury. | Conclusion |
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
The authors are supported by the Rudolf Virchow Center and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Sonderforschungsbereich 688 and grant Ni556/7-1).
Disclosures
None.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Original received October 22, 2007; final version accepted December 1, 2007.
| References |
|---|
2. Junt T, Schulze H, Chen Z, Massberg S, Goerge T, Krueger A, Wagner DD, Graf T, Italiano JE Jr, Shivdasani RA, von Andrian UH. Dynamic visualization of thrombopoiesis within bone marrow. Science. 2007; 317: 1767–1770.
3. Huo Y, Schober A, Forlow SB, Smith DF, Hyman MC, Jung S, Littman DR, Weber C, Ley K. Circulating activated platelets exacerbate atherosclerosis in mice deficient in apolipoprotein E. Nat Med. 2003; 9: 61–67.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Frenette PS, Denis CV, Weiss L, Jurk K, Subbarao S, Kehrel B, Hartwig JH, Vestweber D, Wagner DD. P-Selectin glycoprotein ligand 1 (PSGL-1) is expressed on platelets and can mediate platelet-endothelial interactions in vivo. J Exp Med. 2000; 191: 1413–1422.
5. Massberg S, Brand K, Gruner S, Page S, Muller E, Muller I, Bergmeier W, Richter T, Lorenz M, Konrad I, Nieswandt B, Gawaz M. A critical role of platelet adhesion in the initiation of atherosclerotic lesion formation. J Exp Med. 2002; 196: 887–896.
6. Schober A, Manka D, von Hundelshausen P, Huo Y, Hanrath P, Sarembock IJ, Ley K, Weber C. Deposition of platelet RANTES triggering monocyte recruitment requires P-selectin and is involved in neointima formation after arterial injury. Circulation. 2002; 106: 1523–1529.
7. Mause SF, von Hundelshausen P, Zernecke A, Koenen RR, Weber C. Platelet microparticles: a transcellular delivery system for RANTES promoting monocyte recruitment on endothelium. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005; 25: 1512–1518.
8. Lindemann S, Kramer B, Seizer P, Gawaz M. Platelets, inflammation and atherosclerosis. J Thromb Haemost. 2007; 5 (Suppl 1): 203–211.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Savage B, Almus-Jacobs F, Ruggeri ZM. Specific synergy of multiple substrate-receptor interactions in platelet thrombus formation under flow. Cell. 1998; 94: 657–666.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Furie B, Furie BC. In vivo thrombus formation. J Thromb Haemost. 2007; 5 Suppl 1: 12–17.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Offermanns S. Activation of platelet function through G protein-coupled receptors. Circ Res. 2006; 99: 1293–1304.
12. Ruggeri ZM. Structure and function of von Willebrand factor. Thromb Haemost. 1999; 82: 576–584.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Berndt MC, Shen Y, Dopheide SM, Gardiner EE, Andrews RK. The vascular biology of the glycoprotein Ib-IX-V complex. Thromb Haemost. 2001; 86: 178–188.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Shelton-Inloes BB, Titani K, Sadler JE. cDNA sequences for human von Willebrand factor reveal five types of repeated domains and five possible protein sequence polymorphisms. Biochemistry. 1986; 25: 3164–3171.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Hoylaerts MF, Yamamoto H, Nuyts K, Vreys I, Deckmyn H, Vermylen J. von Willebrand factor binds to native collagen VI primarily via its A1 domain. Biochem J. 1997; 324 (Pt 1): 185–191.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Sporn LA, Marder VJ, Wagner DD. Inducible secretion of large, biologically potent von Willebrand factor multimers. Cell. 1986; 46: 185–190.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Ewenstein BM. Von Willebrands disease. Annu Rev Med. 1997; 48: 525–542.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Denis C, Methia N, Frenette PS, Rayburn H, Ullman-Cullere M, Hynes RO, Wagner DD. A mouse model of severe von Willebrand disease: defects in hemostasis and thrombosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95: 9524–9529.
19. Jurk K, Clemetson KJ, de Groot PG, Brodde MF, Steiner M, Savion N, Varon D, Sixma JJ, Van Aken H, Kehrel BE. Thrombospondin-1 mediates platelet adhesion at high shear via glycoprotein Ib (GPIb): an alternative/backup mechanism to von Willebrand factor. FASEB J. 2003; 17: 1490–1492.
20. Sakariassen KS, Nievelstein PF, Coller BS, Sixma JJ. The role of platelet membrane glycoproteins Ib and IIb-IIIa in platelet adherence to human artery subendothelium. Br J Haematol. 1986; 63: 681–691.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. George JN, Nurden AT, Phillips DR. Molecular defects in interactions of platelets with the vessel wall. N Engl J Med. 1984; 311: 1084–1098.[Abstract]
22. Luo SZ, Mo X, Afshar-Kharghan V, Srinivasan S, Lopez JA, Li R. Glycoprotein Ibalpha forms disulfide bonds with 2 glycoprotein Ibbeta subunits in the resting platelet. Blood. 2007; 109: 603–609.
23. Ozaki Y, Asazuma N, Suzuki-Inoue K, Berndt MC. Platelet GPIb-IX-V-dependent signaling. J Thromb Haemost. 2005; 3: 1745–1751.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Lopez JA, Andrews RK, Afshar-Kharghan V, Berndt MC. Bernard-Soulier syndrome. Blood. 1998; 91: 4397–4418.
25. Ware J, Russell S, Ruggeri ZM. Generation and rescue of a murine model of platelet dysfunction: the Bernard-Soulier syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97: 2803–2808.
26. Kato K, Martinez C, Russell S, Nurden P, Nurden A, Fiering S, Ware J. Genetic deletion of mouse platelet glycoprotein Ib{beta} produces a Bernard-Soulier phenotype with increased {alpha}-granule size. Blood. 2004; 104: 2339–2344.
27. Kanaji T, Russell S, Ware J. Amelioration of the macrothrombocytopenia associated with the murine Bernard-Soulier syndrome. Blood. 2002; 100: 2102–2107.
28. Ramakrishnan V, Reeves PS, DeGuzman F, Deshpande U, Ministri-Madrid K, DuBridge RB, Phillips DR. Increased thrombin responsiveness in platelets from mice lacking glycoprotein V. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96: 13336–13341.
29. Kahn ML, Diacovo TG, Bainton DF, Lanza F, Trejo J, Coughlin SR. Glycoprotein V-deficient platelets have undiminished thrombin responsiveness and do not exhibit a Bernard-Soulier phenotype. Blood. 1999; 94: 4112–4121.
30. Andrews RK, Berndt MC. Platelet physiology and thrombosis. Thromb Res. 2004; 114: 447–453.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Dai K, Bodnar R, Berndt MC, Du X. A critical role for 14-3-3zeta protein in regulating the VWF binding function of platelet glycoprotein Ib-IX and its therapeutic implications. Blood. 2005; 106: 1975–1981.
32. Shrimpton CN, Borthakur G, Larrucea S, Cruz MA, Dong JF, Lopez JA. Localization of the Adhesion Receptor Glycoprotein Ib-IX-V Complex to Lipid Rafts Is Required for Platelet Adhesion and Activation. J Exp Med. 2002; 196: 1057–1066.
33. Arthur JF, Gardiner EE, Matzaris M, Taylor SG, Wijeyewickrema L, Ozaki Y, Kahn ML, Andrews RK, Berndt MC. Glycoprotein VI is associated with GPIb-IX-V on the membrane of resting and activated platelets. Thromb Haemost. 2005; 93: 716–723.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Wu Y, Suzuki-Inoue K, Satoh K, Asazuma N, Yatomi Y, Berndt MC, Ozaki Y. Role of Fc receptor gamma-chain in platelet glycoprotein Ib-mediated signaling. Blood. 2001; 97: 3836–3845.
35. Kasirer-Friede A, Cozzi MR, Mazzucato M, De Marco L, Ruggeri ZM, Shattil SJ. Signaling through GP Ib-IX-V activates alpha IIb beta 3 independently of other receptors. Blood. 2004; 103: 3403–3411.
36. Andrews RK, Harris SJ, McNally T, Berndt MC. Binding of purified 14-3-3 zeta signaling protein to discrete amino acid sequences within the cytoplasmic domain of the platelet membrane glycoprotein Ib-IX-V complex. Biochemistry. 1998; 37: 638–647.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Andrews RK, Munday AD, Mitchell CA, Berndt MC. Interaction of calmodulin with the cytoplasmic domain of the platelet membrane glycoprotein Ib-IX-V complex. Blood. 2001; 98: 681–687.
38. Wu Y, Asazuma N, Satoh K, Yatomi Y, Takafuta T, Berndt MC, Ozaki Y. Interaction between von Willebrand factor and glycoprotein Ib activates Src kinase in human platelets: role of phosphoinositide 3-kinase. Blood. 2003; 101: 3469–3476.
39. Kasirer-Friede A, Moran B, Nagrampa-Orje J, Swanson K, Ruggeri ZM, Schraven B, Neel BG, Koretzky G, Shattil SJ. ADAP is required for normal alphaIIbbeta3 activation by VWF/GP Ib-IX-V and other agonists. Blood. 2007; 109: 1018–1025.
40. Savage B, Saldivar E, Ruggeri ZM. Initiation of platelet adhesion by arrest onto fibrinogen or translocation on von Willebrand factor. Cell. 1996; 84: 289–297.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Massberg S, Gawaz M, Gruner S, Schulte V, Konrad I, Zohlnhofer D, Heinzmann U, Nieswandt B. A crucial role of glycoprotein VI for platelet recruitment to the injured arterial wall in vivo. J Exp Med. 2003; 197: 41–49.
42. Bergmeier W, Piffath CL, Goerge T, Cifuni SM, Ruggeri ZM, Ware J, Wagner DD. The role of platelet adhesion receptor GPIbalpha far exceeds that of its main ligand, von Willebrand factor, in arterial thrombosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103: 16900–16905.
43. Kleinschnitz C, Pozgajova M, Pham M, Bendszus M, Nieswandt B, Stoll G. Targeting platelets in acute experimental stroke: impact of glycoprotein Ib, VI, and IIb/IIIa blockade on infarct size, functional outcome, and intracranial bleeding. Circulation. 2007; 115: 2323–2330.
44. Bergmeier W, Piffath CL, Cheng G, Dole VS, Zhang Y, von Andrian UH, Wagner DD. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha-converting enzyme (ADAM17) mediates GPIbalpha shedding from platelets in vitro and in vivo. Circ Res. 2004; 95: 677–683.
45. Vanhoorelbeke K, Ulrichts H, Van de WG, Fontayne A, Deckmyn H. Inhibition of platelet glycoprotein Ib and its antithrombotic potential. Curr Pharm Des. 2007; 13: 2684–2697.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Morton LF, Hargreaves PG, Farndale RW, Young RD, Barnes MJ. Integrin alpha 2 beta 1-independent activation of platelets by simple collagen-like peptides: collagen tertiary (triple-helical) and quaternary (polymeric) structures are sufficient alone for alpha 2 beta 1-independent platelet reactivity. Biochem J. 1995; 306 (Pt 2): 337–344.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Kehrel B, Wierwille S, Clemetson KJ, Anders O, Steiner M, Knight CG, Farndale RW, Okuma M, Barnes MJ. Glycoprotein VI is a major collagen receptor for platelet activation: it recognizes the platelet-activating quaternary structure of collagen, whereas CD36, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa, and von Willebrand factor do not. Blood. 1998; 91: 491–499.
48. Nieswandt B, Watson SP. Platelet-collagen interaction: is GPVI the central receptor? Blood. 2003; 102: 449–461.
49. Farndale RW, Sixma JJ, Barnes MJ, de Groot PG. The role of collagen in thrombosis and hemostasis. J Thromb Haemost. 2004; 2: 561–573.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Nieswandt B, Brakebusch C, Bergmeier W, Schulte V, Bouvard D, Mokhtari-Nejad R, Lindhout T, Heemskerk JW, Zirngibl H, Fassler R. Glycoprotein VI but not alpha2beta1 integrin is essential for platelet interaction with collagen. EMBO J. 2001; 20: 2120–2130.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Clemetson JM, Polgar J, Magnenat E, Wells TN, Clemetson KJ. The platelet collagen receptor glycoprotein VI is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily closely related to FcalphaR and the natural killer receptors. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274: 29019–29024.
52. Tsuji M, Ezumi Y, Arai M, Takayama H. A novel association of Fc receptor gamma-chain with glycoprotein VI and their co-expression as a collagen receptor in human platelets. J Biol Chem. 1997; 272: 23528–23531.
53. Watson SP, Gibbins J. Collagen receptor signalling in platelets: extending the role of the ITAM. Immunol Today. 1998; 19: 260–264.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
54. Ezumi Y, Shindoh K, Tsuji M, Takayama H. Physical and functional association of the Src family kinases Fyn and Lyn with the collagen receptor glycoprotein VI-Fc receptor gamma chain complex on human platelets. J Exp Med. 1998; 188: 267–276.
55. Briddon SJ, Watson SP. Evidence for the involvement of p59fyn and p53/56lyn in collagen receptor signalling in human platelets. Biochem J. 1999; 338 (Pt 1): 203–209.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
56. Watson SP, Auger JM, McCarty OJ, Pearce AC. GPVI and integrin alphaIIb beta3 signaling in platelets. J Thromb Haemost. 2005; 3: 1752–1762.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
57. Grosse J, Braun A, Varga-Szabo D, Beyersdorf N, Schneider B, Zeitlmann L, Hanke P, Schropp P, Muhlstedt S, Zorn C, Huber M, Schmittwolf C, Jagla W, Yu P, Kerkau T, Schulze H, Nehls M, Nieswandt B. An EF hand mutation in Stim1 causes premature platelet activation and bleeding in mice. J Clin Invest. 2007; 117: 3540–3550.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
58. Pasquet JM, Quek L, Pasquet S, Poole A, Matthews JR, Lowell C, Watson SP. Evidence of a role for SHP-1 in platelet activation by the collagen receptor glycoprotein VI. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 28526–28531.
59. Newman PJ, Newman DK. Signal transduction pathways mediated by PECAM-1: new roles for an old molecule in platelet and vascular cell biology. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23: 953–964.
60. Dhanjal TS, Ross EA, Auger JM, McCarty OJ, Hughes CE, Senis YA, Buckley CD, Watson SP. Minimal regulation of platelet activity by PECAM-1. Platelets. 2007; 18: 56–67.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
61. Wee JL, Jackson DE. The Ig-ITIM superfamily member PECAM-1 regulates the "outside-in" signaling properties of integrin alpha(IIb)beta3 in platelets. Blood. 2005; 106: 3816–3823.
62. Moroi M, Jung SM, Okuma M, Shinmyozu K. A patient with platelets deficient in glycoprotein VI that lack both collagen-induced aggregation and adhesion. J Clin Invest. 1989; 84: 1440–1445.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
63. Boylan B, Chen H, Rathore V, Paddock C, Salacz M, Friedman KD, Curtis BR, Stapleton M, Newman DK, Kahn ML, Newman PJ. Anti-GPVI-associated ITP: an acquired platelet disorder caused by autoantibody-mediated clearance of the GPVI/FcRgamma-chain complex from the human platelet surface. Blood. 2004; 104: 1350–1355.
64. Nieswandt B, Schulte V, Bergmeier W, Mokhtari-Nejad R, Rackebrandt K, Cazenave JP, Ohlmann P, Gachet C, Zirngibl H. Long-term Antithrombotic Protection by In Vivo Depletion of Platelet Glycoprotein VI in Mice. J Exp Med. 2001; 193: 459–470.
65. Kato K, Kanaji T, Russell S, Kunicki TJ, Furihata K, Kanaji S, Marchese P, Reininger A, Ruggeri ZM, Ware J. The contribution of glycoprotein VI to stable platelet adhesion and thrombus formation illustrated by targeted gene deletion. Blood. 2003; 102: 1701–1707.
66. Lockyer S, Okuyama K, Begum S, Le S, Sun B, Watanabe T, Matsumoto Y, Yoshitake M, Kambayashi J, Tandon NN. GPVI-deficient mice lack collagen responses and are protected against experimentally induced pulmonary thromboembolism. Thromb Res. 2006; 118: 371–380.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
67. Konishi H, Katoh Y, Takaya N, Kashiwakura Y, Itoh S, Ra C, Daida H. Platelets activated by collagen through immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif play pivotal role in initiation and generation of neointimal hyperplasia after vascular injury. Circulation. 2002; 105: 912–916.
68. Konstantinides S, Ware J, Marchese P, Almus-Jacobs F, Loskutoff DJ, Ruggeri ZM. Distinct antithrombotic consequences of platelet glycoprotein Ibalpha and VI deficiency in a mouse model of arterial thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost. 2006; 4: 2014–2021.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
69. Hynes RO. Integrins: bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines. Cell. 2002; 110: 673–687.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
70. Shattil SJ, Kashiwagi H, Pampori N. Integrin signaling: the platelet paradigm. Blood. 1998; 91: 2645–2657.
71. Santoro SA. Identification of a 160,000 dalton platelet membrane protein that mediates the initial divalent cation-dependent adhesion of platelets to collagen. Cell. 1986; 46: 913–920.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
72. Nieuwenhuis HK, Akkerman JW, Houdijk WP, Sixma JJ. Human blood platelets showing no response to collagen fail to express surface glycoprotein Ia. Nature. 1985; 318: 470–472.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
73. Kehrel B, Balleisen L, Kokott R, Mesters R, Stenzinger W, Clemetson KJ, van de Loo J. Deficiency of intact thrombospondin and membrane glycoprotein Ia in platelets with defective collagen-induced aggregation and spontaneous loss of disorder. Blood. 1988; 71: 1074–1078.
74. Holtkotter O, Nieswandt B, Smyth N, Muller W, Hafner M, Schulte V, Krieg T, Eckes B. Integrin alpha 2-deficient mice develop normally, are fertile, but display partially defective platelet interaction with collagen. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277: 10789–10794.
75. Chen J, Diacovo TG, Grenache DG, Santoro SA, Zutter MM. The alpha(2) integrin subunit-deficient mouse: a multifaceted phenotype including defects of branching morphogenesis and hemostasis. Am J Pathol. 2002; 161: 337–344.
76. Gruner S, Prostredna M, Schulte V, Krieg T, Eckes B, Brakebusch C, Nieswandt B. Multiple integrin-ligand interactions synergize in shear-resistant platelet adhesion at sites of arterial injury in vivo. Blood. 2003; 102: 4021–4027.
77. Takada Y, Elices MJ, Crouse C, Hemler ME. The primary structure of the alpha 4 subunit of VLA-4: homology to other integrins and a possible cell-cell adhesion function. EMBO J. 1989; 8: 1361–1368.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
78. Emsley J, King SL, Bergelson JM, Liddington RC. Crystal structure of the I domain from integrin alpha2beta1. J Biol Chem. 1997; 272: 28512–28517.
79. Emsley J, Knight CG, Farndale RW, Barnes MJ, Liddington RC. Structural basis of collagen recognition by integrin alpha2beta1. Cell. 2000; 101: 47–56.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
80. Smith C, Estavillo D, Emsley J, Bankston LA, Liddington RC, Cruz MA. Mapping the collagen-binding site in the I domain of the glycoprotein Ia/IIa (integrin alpha(2)beta(1)). J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 4205–4209.
81. Santoro SA, Walsh JJ, Staatz WD, Baranski KJ. Distinct determinants on collagen support alpha 2 beta 1 integrin-mediated platelet adhesion and platelet activation. Cell Regul. 1991; 2: 905–913.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
82. Jung SM, Moroi M. Signal-transducing mechanisms involved in activation of the platelet collagen receptor integrin alpha(2)beta(1). J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 8016–8026.
83. Jung SM, Moroi M. Platelet collagen receptor integrin alpha2beta1 activation involves differential participation of ADP-receptor subtypes P2Y1 and P2Y12 but not intracellular calcium change. Eur J Biochem. 2001; 268: 3513–3522.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
84. Van de Walle GR, Vanhoorelbeke K, Majer Z, Illyes E, Baert J, Pareyn I, Deckmyn H. Two functional active conformations of the integrin {alpha}2{beta}1, depending on activation condition and cell type. J Biol Chem. 2005; 280: 36873–36882.
85. Van de Walle GR, Schoolmeester A, Iserbyt BF, Cosemans JM, Heemskerk JW, Hoylaerts MF, Nurden A, Vanhoorelbeke K, Deckmyn H. Activation of alphaIIbbeta3 is a sufficient but also an imperative prerequisite for activation of alpha2beta1 on platelets. Blood. 2007; 109: 595–602.
86. Inoue O, Suzuki-Inoue K, Dean WL, Frampton J, Watson SP. Integrin {alpha}2{beta}1 mediates outside-in regulation of platelet spreading on collagen through activation of Src kinases and PLC{gamma}2. J Cell Biol. 2003; 160: 769–780.
87. Chen H, Kahn ML. Reciprocal signaling by integrin and nonintegrin receptors during collagen activation of platelets. Mol Cell Biol. 2003; 23: 4764–4777.
88. Siljander PR, Munnix IC, Smethurst PA, Deckmyn H, Lindhout T, Ouwehand WH, Farndale RW, Heemskerk JW. Platelet receptor interplay regulates collagen-induced thrombus formation in flowing human blood. Blood. 2004; 103: 1333–1341.
89. He L, Pappan LK, Grenache DG, Li Z, Tollefsen DM, Santoro SA, Zutter MM. The contributions of the {alpha}2{beta}1 integrin to vascular thrombosis in vivo. Blood. 2003; 102: 3652–3657.
90. Ruggeri ZM. Platelets in atherothrombosis. Nat Med. 2002; 8: 1227–1234.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
91. Nurden AT. Glanzmann thrombasthenia. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2006; 1: 10.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
92. Hodivala-Dilke KM, McHugh KP, Tsakiris DA, Rayburn H, Crowley D, Ullman-Cullere M, Ross FP, Coller BS, Teitelbaum S, Hynes RO. Beta3-integrin-deficient mice are a model for Glanzmann thrombasthenia showing placental defects and reduced survival. J Clin Invest. 1999; 103: 229–238.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
93. Ni H, Denis CV, Subbarao S, Degen JL, Sato TN, Hynes RO, Wagner DD. Persistence of platelet thrombus formation in arterioles of mice lacking both von Willebrand factor and fibrinogen. J Clin Invest. 2000; 106: 385–392.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
94. Xiong JP, Stehle T, Diefenbach B, Zhang R, Dunker R, Scott DL, Joachimiak A, Goodman SL, Arnaout MA. Crystal structure of the extracellular segment of integrin alpha Vbeta3. Science. 2001; 294: 339–345.
95. Xiong JP, Stehle T, Zhang R, Joachimiak A, Frech M, Goodman SL, Arnaout MA. Crystal structure of the extracellular segment of integrin alpha Vbeta3 in complex with an Arg-Gly-Asp ligand. Science. 2002; 296: 151–155.
96. Adair BD, Yeager M. Three-dimensional model of the human platelet integrin alpha IIbbeta 3 based on electron cryomicroscopy and x-ray crystallography. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99: 14059–14064.
97. Carrell NA, Fitzgerald LA, Steiner B, Erickson HP, Phillips DR. Structure of human platelet membrane glycoproteins IIb and IIIa as determined by electron microscopy. J Biol Chem. 1985; 260: 1743–1749.
98. Weisel JW, Nagaswami C, Vilaire G, Bennett JS. Examination of the platelet membrane glycoprotein IIb-IIIa complex and its interaction with fibrinogen and other ligands by electron microscopy. J Biol Chem. 1992; 267: 16637–16643.
99. Smith JW, Piotrowicz RS, Mathis D. A mechanism for divalent cation regulation of beta 3-integrins. J Biol Chem. 1994; 269: 960–967.
100. Ginsberg MH, Partridge A, Shattil SJ. Integrin regulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2005; 17: 509–516.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
101. Hughes PE, Diaz-Gonzalez F, Leong L, Wu C, McDonald JA, Shattil SJ, Ginsberg MH. Breaking the integrin hinge. A defined structural constraint regulates integrin signaling. J Biol Chem. 1996; 271: 6571–6574.
102. Peterson JA, Visentin GP, Newman PJ, Aster RH. A recombinant soluble form of the integrin alpha IIb beta 3 (GPIIb-IIIa) assumes an active, ligand-binding conformation and is recognized by GPIIb-IIIa-specific monoclonal, allo-, auto-, and drug-dependent platelet antibodies. Blood. 1998; 92: 2053–2063.
103. Calderwood DA, Zent R, Grant R, Rees DJ, Hynes RO, Ginsberg MH. The Talin head domain binds to integrin beta subunit cytoplasmic tails and regulates integrin activation. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274: 28071–28074.
104. Tadokoro S, Shattil SJ, Eto K, Tai V, Liddington RC, de Pereda JM, Ginsberg MH, Calderwood DA. Talin binding to integrin beta tails: a final common step in integrin activation. Science. 2003; 302: 103–106.
105. Nieswandt B, Moser M, Pleines I, Varga-Szabo D, Monkley S, Critchley D, Fassler R. Loss of talin 1 in platelets abrogates integrin activation, platelet aggregration, and thrombus formation in vitro and in vivo. J Exp Med. 2007; 204: 3113–3118.
106. Petrich BG, Fogelstrand P, Partridge AW, Yousefi N, Ablooglu AJ, Shattil SJ, Ginsberg MH. The antithrombotic potential of selective blockade of talin-dependent integrin alpha(IIb)beta(3) (platelet GPIIb-IIIa) activation. J Clin Invest. 2007; 117: 2250–2259.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
107. Larkin D, Murphy D, Reilly DF, Cahill M, Sattler E, Harriott P, Cahill DJ, Moran N. ICln, a novel integrin alphaIIbbeta3-associated protein, functionally regulates platelet activation. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279: 27286–27293.
108. Naik UP, Patel PM, Parise LV. Identification of a novel calcium-binding protein that interacts with the integrin alphaIIb cytoplasmic domain. J Biol Chem. 1997; 272: 4651–4654.
109. Vijayan KV, Liu Y, Li TT, Bray PF. Protein phosphatase 1 associates with the integrin alphaIIb subunit and regulates signaling. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279: 33039–33042.
110. Arias-Salgado EG, Lizano S, Sarkar S, Brugge JS, Ginsberg MH, Shattil SJ. Src kinase activation by direct interaction with the integrin beta cytoplasmic domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100: 13298–13302.
111. Wonerow P, Pearce AC, Vaux DJ, Watson SP. A critical role for phospholipase Cgamma2 in alphaIIbbeta3-mediated platelet spreading. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278: 37520–37529.
112. Quinn MJ, Byzova TV, Qin J, Topol EJ, Plow EF. Integrin alphaIIbbeta3 and its antagonism. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23: 945–952.
113. Suzuki S, Argraves WS, Pytela R, Arai H, Krusius T, Pierschbacher MD, Ruoslahti E. cDNA and amino acid sequences of the cell adhesion protein receptor recognizing vitronectin reveal a transmembrane domain and homologies with other adhesion protein receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986; 83: 8614–8618.
114. Kamata T, Handa M, Sato Y, Ikeda Y, Aiso S. Membrane-proximal {alpha}/{beta} stalk interactions differentially regulate integrin activation. J Biol Chem. 2005; 280: 24775–24783.
115. Sonnenberg A, Modderman PW, Hogervorst F. Laminin receptor on platelets is the integrin VLA-6. Nature. 1988; 336: 487–489.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
116. Inoue O, Suzuki-Inoue K, McCarty OJ, Moroi M, Ruggeri ZM, Kunicki TJ, Ozaki Y, Watson SP. Laminin stimulates spreading of platelets through integrin alpha6beta1-dependent activation of GPVI. Blood. 2006; 107: 1405–1412.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. May, I. Hagedorn, I. Pleines, M. Bender, T. Vogtle, J. Eble, M. Elvers, and B. Nieswandt CLEC-2 is an essential platelet-activating receptor in hemostasis and thrombosis Blood, October 15, 2009; 114(16): 3464 - 3472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Schmaier and M. L. Kahn Platelet integrin signaling: wherefore art thou? Blood, September 24, 2009; 114(13): 2571 - 2572. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-P. Collet and G. Montalescot Review: Platelet Function Testing and Implications for Clinical Practice Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, September 1, 2009; 14(3): 157 - 169. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Kleinschnitz, S. F. De Meyer, T. Schwarz, M. Austinat, K. Vanhoorelbeke, B. Nieswandt, H. Deckmyn, and G. Stoll Deficiency of von Willebrand factor protects mice from ischemic stroke Blood, April 9, 2009; 113(15): 3600 - 3603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R. Legate, S. A. Wickstrom, and R. Fassler Genetic and cell biological analysis of integrin outside-in signaling Genes & Dev., February 15, 2009; 23(4): 397 - 418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. S. Coller and S. J. Shattil The GPIIb/IIIa (integrin {alpha}IIb{beta}3) odyssey: a technology-driven saga of a receptor with twists, turns, and even a bend Blood, October 15, 2008; 112(8): 3011 - 3025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |