Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2008;28:1694-1702
Published online before print July 31, 2008, doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.155143
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/10/1694    most recent
ATVBAHA.107.155143v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kavurma, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kavurma, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, M. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Apoptosis
Right arrow Cell signalling/signal transduction
Right arrow Smooth muscle proliferation and differentiation
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2008;28:1694.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Brief Reviews

Death Receptors and Their Ligands in Atherosclerosis

Mary M. Kavurma; Nicole Y. Tan; Martin R. Bennett

From the Centre for Vascular Research (M.M.K., N.Y.T.), The University of New South Wales, Australia; and the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (M.R.B.), University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

Correspondence to Dr Mary M. Kavurma, The Centre for Vascular Research, The University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia. E-mail m.kavurma{at}unsw.edu.au


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowTNFR Family Signaling
down arrowRole of Death Receptors...
down arrowConclusions
down arrowReferences
 
Atherosclerosis is characterized by the accumulation of a fibro-fatty plaque consisting of immune cells, vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), vascular endothelial cells (ECs), and extracellular matrix, surrounding a lipid-rich core. The complexity of atherosclerosis is highlighted by the multifaceted effects that apoptosis and proliferation of specific cell types can have on vessels at different stages of the disease. Death receptors are membrane-bound protein complexes that on binding their cognate ligand, activate an intracellular signaling cascade that results in apoptosis. More recently, signaling from these receptors has been shown to activate multiple other processes, including cell proliferation. This review summarizes our current understanding of signaling events after death receptor activation and the role of death receptors and their ligands in atherosclerosis.

On binding to their ligands, death receptors transmit apoptotic signals leading to irreversible programmed cell death. Recent studies also implicate death receptors in survival/activation signals, and consequently their role in atherosclerosis is unclear. This review encapsulates our recent understanding of death receptor signaling in atherosclerosis and related disorders.


Key Words: apoptosis • TNF/TNFR signalling • proliferation • atherosclerosis


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowTNFR Family Signaling
down arrowRole of Death Receptors...
down arrowConclusions
down arrowReferences
 
There are currently more than 40 tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-ligand/TNF-receptor (TNFR) members,1 with biological roles ranging from inflammation, apoptosis, autoimmunity, and organogenesis. TNFR superfamily members are type I transmembrane proteins and can be classified into 3 groups (reviewed in1,2). Members of the first group include receptors such as TNFR1, TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) death receptors (DR) DR4 and DR5, and CD95/Fas. These proteins contain a death domain (DD) within their cytoplasmic tail which provides the capacity for protein–protein interactions with other DD-containing proteins. The second group of proteins include TNFR2 and receptor activator of NF{kappa}B (RANK), where the cytoplasmic tail of these proteins do not contain a DD. Instead, these receptors contain TIM domains (TNF receptor-associating factor [TRAF] interacting motifs), which leads to recruitment of TRAF proteins and activation of signal transduction pathways such as NF{kappa}B, Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and p38. The third group of proteins does not contain functional intracellular signaling domains and is termed decoy receptors (DcR). These receptors can compete with their corresponding TNFR for ligand binding and include DcR1, DcR2, and osteoprotegerin (OPG) for TRAIL, and DcR and soluble DcR3 for Fas. TNFRs are characterized by highly conserved cystein-rich domains (CRD), containing 1 to 4 CRDs within their extracellular domain among the various family members, which are required for ligand binding and self association. TNFRs can form trimers or oligomers on the cell surface, and this oligomerisation defines the potency of subsequent signaling events.1

Most TNF ligands are type II transmembrane proteins (reviewed in1,2) and include TNF (for TNFR1), TRAIL (for TRAIL receptors [TRAIL-Rs]), and Fas ligand (FasL, for Fas). Some of these ligands are released from the membrane after proteolytic cleavage to produce biologically active soluble trimers that can trigger receptor activation (Figure 1). The main signals transmitted from TNF death receptors such as TNFR1, TRAIL-R, and Fas result in an apoptotic response characterized by direct activation of intracellular cysteine proteases (caspases), without directly involving the mitochondrial death pathway. However, these death receptors have also been shown to initiate survival signals via the activation of transcription factors NF{kappa}B and Ap1,1 and consequently their function is far more complicated than originally described (below).


Figure 1
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. TNF ligand-receptor interaction. Left, TNF (soluble and membrane-bound) binding to TNFR1 results in TNFR1 trimerisation. Middle, FasL can bind Fas to initiate apoptosis. Decoy receptors, DcR and soluble DcR3 contain extracellular ligand-binding domains but do not contain an intracellular death domain, competing with Fas to bind FasL and subsequently do not induce apoptosis. Right, There are 4 membrane-bound and one soluble TRAIL receptor (OPG). Apoptosis only occurs after TRAIL binding to death receptors DR4 or DR5. Decoy receptors of TRAIL (DcR1 and 2) do not induce apoptosis. Orange shading indicates death domain; white shading, partial death domain.


*    TNFR Family Signaling
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*TNFR Family Signaling
down arrowRole of Death Receptors...
down arrowConclusions
down arrowReferences
 
Induction of Apoptosis
Emerging evidence now indicates that TNFR members exist as preassembled oligomers before ligand stimulation.3 Studies of Fas and TNFR1 have identified a ligand-independent oligomerisation domain termed the preligand assembly domain (PLAD), which is believed to assist in the specificity and speed of the apoptotic response, because the receptors can preassemble and induce superclustering at the cell membrane after ligand engagement.3 Subsequently apoptosis is initiated via the formation of the death-inducing signaling complex (DISC), which comprises the ligand, death receptor, and the Fas-associated death domain (FADD) protein (Figure 2). FADD contains a death effector domain (DED) motif that binds procaspase-8. Recruitment of caspase-8 to the DISC leads to the activation of caspase-8 and subsequent activation of effector caspases (-3, -6, and -7). Similarly, caspase-10 recruitment also requires FADD and can initiate an apoptotic signal in the absence of caspase-8.4 This receptor-mediated pathway has been termed the extrinsic death pathway.


Figure 2
View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Pathways induced by TNF ligand–TNFR interactions. Right, On ligand binding to the TNFR, the death-inducing signaling complex (DISC) is formed consisting of TNF ligand-receptor, Fas-associated death domain (FADD), and caspase-8 or -10. During extrinsic apoptotic pathways, the N terminus of FADD binds to activate caspase-8 followed by activation of caspase-3, -6, and -7. c-FLIP can inhibit apoptosis by binding the DISC and blocking activation of caspase-8. The intrinsic apoptotic pathway involves the mitochondria, where translocation of Bax into the mitochondria results cytochrome c and Smac/DIABLO release into the cytosol. Cytochrome c and Apaf-1 activate caspase-9, which subsequently activates caspase-3, -6, and -7. Left, Nonapoptotic signaling of TNFR involves recruitment of TRAF and TRADD. The complex then recruits FADD and RIP to activate NF{kappa}B, JNK, MAPK/ERK, or Akt pathways with subsequent transcriptional activation of survival genes such as IGF1R, c-FLIP, c-XIAP-1, c-XIAP-2, XIAP, TRAF-1 and -2, and Bcl-XL.

The extrinsic pathway should be contrasted with that activated when cells undergo DNA damage for example, whereby translocation of the proapoptotic protein Bax to the mitochondria results in the loss of transmembrane potential, and induces the release of cytochrome c and Smac/DIABLO into the cytosol. Cytochrome c and Apaf-1 then activate caspase-9 with subsequent proteolytic activation of caspases -3, -6, and –7 (Figure 2). This pathway has been termed the intrinsic death pathway because it involves the mitochondria. Interestingly, cross-talk between the extrinsic and intrinsic pathways has been observed. In cells with insufficient activation of caspase-8 or -10 after death receptor activation, cleavage of Bid results in translocation to the mitochondria where it can activate Bax and Bak to stimulate apoptosis. These apoptotic signaling pathways are illustrated in Figure 2.

Cell Survival and Proliferation
Other than programmed cell death, TNFRs also present survival/activation signals (Figure 2), typically through activation of JNK and NF{kappa}B. Interestingly, TNFR1 also transduces survival signals by recruiting adapter molecules TRAFs. At least 6 mammalian TRAFs have been identified to date1 and they interact directly with the TNFR-associated-DD protein (TRADD), a 34-kDa adapter protein that binds to TNFR1 via its DD. TRADD then recruits downstream signaling molecules including FADD and receptor-interacting protein (RIP). Subsequently, TRAFs are capable of mediating activation of JNK and NF{kappa}B. In apoptosis signaling, the cellular FADD-like interleukin (IL)-1beta-converting enzyme (FLICE)-like inhibitory protein (c-FLIP) binds to the DISC and blocks caspase-8 processing and activation, and subsequently inhibits Fas-induced apoptosis.5 However, c-FLIPs also interact with TRAF-1, TRAF-2, and RIP, resulting in activation of NF{kappa}B and extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK).6 This inhibition of caspase 8 and activation of NF{kappa}B and ERK switches the signal from apoptosis to nonapoptotic pathways. Like TNFR1, activation of NF{kappa}B and JNK via TRAIL death receptors DR4 or DR5 is mediated by recruitment of TRADD,7 RIP,8 and TRAF28 and can occur independently of caspase-8 or -10.9 Once in the nucleus, NF{kappa}B can mediate the activation of genes shown to suppress apoptosis including cellular inhibitor of apoptosis proteins 1 and 2 (c-IAP1 and c-IAP2),10 X-linked mammalian inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP),11 TRAF1 and TRAF2,10 c-FLIP,12 and B-cell leukemia-extra long (Bcl-XL).13

In addition to the cell-execution death pathway, FasL and Fas are also capable of activating other cellular processes including proliferation.14 For example, activation of Fas enhances proliferation of TCR-stimulated T cells and thymocytes by caspase activation without the induction of apoptosis.15 Interestingly, the strongly conserved proline-rich cytoplasmic tail of FasL interacts with SH3 (Src homology 3)-domain containing proteins16 to stimulate activation of Akt, ERK1/2, and JNK.17 Although TRAIL, DR4, and DR5 can also activate ERK1/2,18 MAPK,18 JNK,9 and Akt,19 the mechanisms for the antiapoptotic role of FasL/Fas and TRAIL/TRAIL-R at present are largely undefined.

Lipid Rafts: The Switch From Apoptosis to Survival?
One of the major unanswered questions from these studies has been how signaling events from the same ligand receptor can activate diametrically opposed pathways, either apoptosis or survival, and at what level such regulation is exerted. Recent studies have suggested that at least some of this regulation occurs at the level of incorporation of specific protein components into lipid rafts. During apoptosis, 4 sequential molecular ordering events occur in Fas-mediated signaling: (1) formation of Fas microaggregates at the cell surface induced by FasL, (2) actin-dependent assembly of FADD and DISC components, (3) formation of higher-order receptor clusters that are caspase-8 dependent, and (4) actin-dependent FasL-Fas internalization via an endosomal pathway.20 Recent evidence has implicated Fas translocation and clustering into lipid rafts21 in Fas signaling. Lipid rafts are membrane microdomains capable of forming platforms, consisting of a dynamic pool of cholesterol and sphingolipids. The tight interaction of cholesterol and sphingolipids determines the transition of the microdomains to a liquid-ordered phase; lipid rafts may thus act as platforms for recruiting and concentrating signaling molecules including cell surface receptors.22 Consistent with these findings, expression of sphingomyelin causes Fas-mediated apoptosis with translocation of Fas into lipid rafts and subsequent Fas clustering.23 Redistribution of TNFR1 and TRAIL receptors into lipid rafts have also been observed.24,25

However, the role of signal transduction events after receptor translocation into lipid rafts is controversial. For example, multiple drugs induce the translocation of Fas and TRAIL receptors into lipid rafts to initiate an apoptotic signal.24,26 In contrast, TNFR1 initiates the activation of NF{kappa}B,27 ERK2,28 and MAPK,25 and FasL-SH3-domain containing protein recruitment to lipid rafts involves activation of Akt, ERK1/2, and JNK, signaling pathways involved in survival. Interestingly, a recent study reports that TRAIL-receptor-DISC assembly in lipid rafts initiates an apoptotic signal in nonsmall cell lung carcinoma, whereas nonrafts mediate TRAIL induced activation of NF{kappa}B and ERK1/2.22 Furthermore, the assembly of RIP and c-FLIP to TRAIL-receptor interactions mediates the nonapoptotic signals of TRAIL.22 These findings suggest that redistribution of TNFR and DISC components from nonrafts to lipid rafts can control the switch between survival signals and apoptosis.22


*    Role of Death Receptors in the Vasculature
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowTNFR Family Signaling
*Role of Death Receptors...
down arrowConclusions
down arrowReferences
 
Apoptosis and proliferation are intimately coupled processes involved in normal tissue homeostasis within the vasculature. The balance between aberrant proliferation and apoptosis is accountable for mediating profound changes in the development of atherosclerosis. The consequences of abnormal apoptosis or proliferation of cells within atherosclerotic plaques is either beneficial or detrimental to lesion development, depending on the stage of lesions, localization, and the cell type involved. For example, elimination of VSMCs from a vessel via FasL/Fas-induced apoptosis can inhibit intimal hyperplasia after vascular injury.29,30 On the other hand, aberrant apoptosis of VSMCs cells induced during the advanced stage of atherosclerosis can promote plaque rupture.31 Some of these effects are outlined in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Abnormal Apoptosis and Proliferation of Vascular Cells in Atherosclerosis

Multiple cell types of the vessel wall express TNF-ligands and TNFRs including FasL/Fas, TNF-{alpha}/TNFR1, and TRAIL/TRAIL-R, in both normal vessels and lesions of atherosclerosis.32–41 Although not fully established, factors evident in atherosclerotic lesions can influence the expression of these death receptors and their ligands (Table 2), and some of these factors include TNF-{alpha} itself, insulin, oxLDL, IFN family members, homocystein, IL-1, and NF{kappa}B. Increased or decreased expression of TNFR or TNF ligands may contribute to their physiological role to induce death or survival of cells; however, vascular cells are frequently resistant to TNFR-mediated death. For example, TNF- or Fas-receptor signaling alone did not trigger apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) but required the contribution of other cytokines to induce vascular cell death.32,42 Additionally, death receptor signaling in some cell types may be proatherogenic but antiatherogenic in other cells. This means that studies in which a particular gene or protein is overexpressed or inhibited in multiple cell types are difficult to interpret. For example, global deficiency of FasL and TNF-{alpha} alone does not alter atherosclerotic lesion development even after a high-fat diet.43,44 Interestingly, plasma from patients with acute myocardial function, unstable angina pectoris, and hypertension have elevated levels of soluble FasL,45,46 linking the presence of the less active soluble form of FasL with unstable coronary syndromes, although the significance of this finding is unclear. However, we do know that FasL–/– ApoE–/– mice and Fas–/– ApoE–/– mice display enhanced atherosclerotic lesions compared to ApoE–/– mice.43,47 TNFR1 knockout mice display increased atherosclerosis,43,44 suggesting that the presence of this receptor is ultimately antiatherogenic. Death receptor signaling is further complicated in TNF-{alpha}–/– ApoE–/– double-knockout mice which display reduced lesion size and diminished development of atherosclerosis.48 The effects of TRAIL in atherosclerosis in vivo also remains uncertain, although the finding that serum soluble TRAIL levels are reduced in patients predisposed to coronary artery disease34,49 implicates a protective role for TRAIL in cardiovascular disorders. In addition to the apparently contradictory effects of manipulations of specific TNFs, TNFRs attributable to changes in multiple cell types within the vessel wall, global deficiency of TNFRs or TNF ligands may predispose to atherosclerosis via systemic effects. For example, Fas-deficient (lpr) and FasL-deficient (gld) mice have a lupus-like syndrome, resulting in the production of neoepitopes that may cross-react with oxidized low density lipoprotein (OxLDL), and thus may promote inflammation.35


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Expression of TNFR and TNF-Ligands Induced by Atherogenic and Antiatherogenic Factors in Vascular Cells

In contrast to the effects of global absence of death receptors or ligands in all vessel walls in vivo, effects of death ligand receptor interactions have been studied in individual cell types in culture. ECs, VSMCs, and inflammatory cells including macrophages and T cells express death ligands and death receptors to a variable extent. Our understanding of death receptor signaling in ECs, VSMCs, and inflammatory cells is summarized below.

Death Receptor Signaling in ECs of the Vessel Wall
The endothelium controls inflammation, vascular remodeling, and vascular tone, and ECs can retard atherogenesis by acting as barriers to inflammatory T-cells and macrophages.50 Because vascular ECs are primary targets for proinflammatory actions within the vessel wall, EC dysfunction may lead to the infiltration of inflammatory cells and lipids. After damage to the endothelium, VSMC migration and proliferation is also induced within the denuded lesion, suggesting that EC dysfunction can regulate VSMC proliferation leading to increased intimal thickening.51 Indeed, Fas activation in ECs sensitizes to Fas-mediated death under hypercholesterolemic conditions, promoting EC loss, leading to accelerated atherogenesis.52 EC loss can also induce local thrombosis, and may thus partly underlie vessel occlusion after plaque erosion.53

Although the role of EC apoptosis in vivo needs further elucidation, multiple strands of evidence suggest that TNFR-induced apoptosis of ECs is important in vivo. For example, in vitro TNFR/ligand-initiated apoptosis of vascular ECs has been observed.54–59 TNF-{alpha} is expressed in ECs and multiple cell types within human atheroma and in lesion-prone regions of aorta.40,60 Human plaque microparticles carry active TNF-{alpha}-converting enzyme that enhances cell surface processing of TNF and TNFR1 on ECs,61 and ligation of TNF-{alpha} to TNFR1 on ECs can induce apoptosis.57 Finally, activation of TNFR1 can induce apoptosis and inhibit migration of ECs.57

In contrast to TNF-{alpha}, ECs express FasL62 and low levels of Fas, but appear to be resistant to FasL/Fas-mediated apoptosis.62 However, on stimulation with cytokines such as TNF-{alpha} or interferon gamma (IFN{gamma}), Fas expression and apoptosis is induced in ECs.63 Furthermore, OxLDL that is evident in atherosclerotic lesions induces EC apoptosis by sensitizing these cells to Fas-mediated cell death.35,63 Interestingly this Fas-mediated EC apoptosis occurs through decreased expression of c-FLIP.63

Human aortic ECs (HAECs) and human umbilical vein ECs (HUVECs) also express TRAIL and TRAIL-R (DR4, DR5, DcR1, and DcR2).18,54 Although there are reports of TRAIL-induced EC death in culture,56 the majority of studies implicate TRAIL in nonapoptotic pathways in ECs. For example, recent evidence suggests that TRAIL may play a role in leukocyte/EC adhesion,57,64,65 in part through NF{kappa}B. 70% of EC that did not die after TRAIL treatment in culture demonstrated increased NF{kappa}B activity and increased expression of adhesion molecules on ECs.56 Not only is the proadhesive role of TRAIL in ECs supported by other studies,64,65 this effect is also seen with the decoy receptor DcR3. DcR3 activation increases monocyte adhesion to ECs via NF{kappa}B activation and transcriptional upregulation of ICAM1, VCAM1, and IL-8.66 In contrast, FasL on vascular endothelium inhibits TNF-{alpha}-induced leukocyte extravasation67 and in carotid artery allografts delayed infiltration of inflammatory cells and diminished intimal hyperplasia,68,69 suggesting antiinflammatory functions for TNFR and their ligands in atherosclerosis.

TNF ligands and TNFR have other multiple actions in ECs. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) maintains vascular tone, promotes EC survival and migration, and has antithrombotic and antiinflammatory activity in atherosclerosis.70 TRAIL in particular is implicated in NO production resulting in migration of HUVECs and subsequent activation of eNOS in an Akt-dependent manner.71 TRAIL-inducible NO occurs by redistribution of eNOS from the plasma membrane to the cytoplasm without inducing apoptosis.72 TRAIL has also been implicated in EC proliferation18,54 and survival, in part by activating Akt and ERK but not p38, JNK, or NF{kappa}B.18 These recent findings have significant implications in TNF ligand/TNFR-mediated EC biology and subsequent cardiovascular function.

Death Receptor Signaling in Inflammatory Cells of the Vessel Wall
Inflammatory cells are found in all stages of atherogenesis,73 and the recruitment of monocytes and lymphocytes into the vessel wall is a critical factor in the progression of atherosclerosis.73 Once in the lesion, T-cells and macrophages can generate reactive oxygen species and cytokines that can subsequently amplify the inflammatory response. It has been generally perceived that loss of macrophages through systemic apoptosis may promote plaque stability. For example, direct induction of monocyte/macrophage apoptosis in ApoE–/– mice either reduced plaque development in atherogenesis or had no effect on plaque size or inflammation when induced in established lesions.74 Indeed, administration of TRAIL to ApoE–/– diabetic mice induced macrophage apoptosis and markedly reduced plaque formation, suggesting that macrophage apoptosis may be beneficial in reducing plaque development. This concept is consistent with previous studies showing that ablation of monocyte/macrophage recruitment and/or reduction of macrophages in mice lacking chemoattractant proteins such as monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) inhibits atherogenesis,75 and CD4 T-cell depletion results in reduced lesion formation.76

However, there is some controversy regarding this because apoptotic inflammatory cells colocalize to regions both of inflammation and to sites of plaque rupture,77 and apoptosis increases the release of tissue factor from macrophages.78 Furthermore, secondary necrosis of unphagocytosed apoptotic macrophages, for example when phagocytosis is delayed, is suggested to be a potent proinflammatory event.79 The increase in apoptosis of macrophages at these sites is believed to contribute to atheroprogression via cellular debris accumulation, increased inflammation, and growth of the necrotic core.80 Thus, the contribution of inflammatory cell apoptosis both local and systemic in the development of atherosclerosis is a multi-faceted complex process dependent on different stages of the disease.

The role of death receptors in inflammatory cell apoptosis in vivo and in vitro is also not well established. T lymphocytes and macrophages express some TNFR/ligands in plaques,36,73,81–84 and TNFR pathways have been implicated in T cell and macrophage death.38,69,85–87 In particular, FasL overexpression on the endothelium significantly attenuated T cell and macrophage accumulation in atherosclerosis,69,87 suggesting that Fas-L on ECs engages Fas on migrating inflammatory cells, inducing apoptosis as they adhere. Furthermore, NO-induced macrophage death was inhibited by Fas-Fc chimeras, and macrophages from Fas-deficient mice are more resistant to NO-induced death.86 As mentioned above, administration of TRAIL in diabetic ApoE-null mice also demonstrated apoptosis of infiltrating macrophages.38 In contrast to these findings suggesting that the major effect of Fas/FasL on inflammatory of immune cells is induction of apoptosis, activation of Fas enhances proliferation of TCR-stimulated T-cells and thymocytes.15,17 In particular, the proline-rich intracellular domain of FasL can stimulate antigen-specific T-cell proliferation by inducing the phosphorylation of Akt, ERK1/2, JNK, and FasL itself.17 FasL can also transduce a costimulatory signal by activating the transcription factors NFAT and AP-1, and by enhancing IFN-{gamma} production.17 These studies suggest that Fas-FasL signaling may induce apoptosis of macrophages but also promote proliferation and change phenotype of T cells, ultimately promoting atherosclerosis. Indeed, adenovirus administration of FasL to hypercholesterolaemic rabbits enhances atherosclerosis.88

VSMCs
Although apoptosis of VSMCs is seen less frequently than in macrophages in atherosclerosis, recent studies have clarified the role of VSMC apoptosis in all phases of atherosclerosis. Apoptosis of VSMCs in advanced lesions can reduce VSMC production of extracellular matrix and collagen, thinning the fibrous cap, expanding the necrotic core, and subsequently promoting plaque instability and potential rupture.31 Intense VSMC apoptosis can also promote both local and systemic inflammation.31 Low level VSMC apoptosis can induce vulnerable plaque features as plaques develop or in established lesions, and profound changes in vessel media, resulting in acceleration of vascular calcification and medial degeneration.89 FasL and Fas are expressed in VSMCs from normal vessels and atherosclerotic plaques,32,33 and FasL-induced apoptosis can reduce VSMC accumulation and inhibit intimal hyperplasia after vascular injury.29,30,62,87 In contrast, VSMC apoptosis induced by the FasL/Fas in established plaques can promote plaque rupture.62,90

FasL-Fas–mediated apoptosis in VSMCs has also been observed in vitro.83,84,91–93 For example, macrophages expressing FasL can induce apoptosis of plaque-derived VSMCs,83 and IFN{gamma}, a cytokine abundant in atherosclerotic lesions and secreted by T lymphocytes, can also induce apoptosis of VSMC in a Fas-dependent manner both in vitro and in human arteries transplanted into immunodeficient mice in vivo.92 Unlike in inflammatory cells, Fas and some other death receptors are predominantly intracellular in VSMCs, requiring priming of the cell with either expression of specific gene products (eg, the tumor suppressor gene p53 or inflammatory cytokines such as IFN{gamma}, NO, and IL-1β) to relocate it to the cell surface where it is active.94 IFN{gamma}-induced Fas trafficking requires PI3K, Akt, and Jak-2.92 Furthermore, apoptosis of VSMCs is induced after increased expression of FasL by the zinc-finger transcription factor Sp1, which in turn is phosphorylated by the atypical protein kinase C-zeta (PKC-{zeta}).93 Indeed, human carotid atherosclerotic plaques demonstrate increased expression of PKC-{zeta} and FasL in terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling (TUNEL)–positive VSMCs.95

Like FasL-Fas, TRAIL and TRAIL-R have been implicated in VSMC death.34,36,37 In vitro studies demonstrate that VSMCs express all TRAIL-Rs,96 and VSMCs are susceptible to cell death induced by TRAIL.36 TRAIL is expressed on the surface of immune cells and adoptive transfer of CD4 T cells to immunodeficient mice implanted with human carotid plaque tissue induces plaque VSMC apoptosis,36 suggesting that immune cells invading the plaque may kill VSMCs in lesions. Interestingly, VSMC apoptosis was blocked using antibodies targeting TRAIL and DR5,36 and other studies have shown that TRAIL-R death pathways are active in VSMCs.96,97

Recently, nonapoptotic functions of TRAIL have been identified.98 TRAIL administration increases the VSMC content in plaques of diabetic ApoE–/– mice,38 implicating a protective role for TRAIL in VSMC biology. Although this phenomenon may be attributable in part to the reciprocal induction of macrophage apoptosis, TRAIL has been shown to increase VSMC proliferation and migration in vitro, via activation of ERK and Akt.38,99 In support of these findings, we recently showed that TRAIL-induced VSMC proliferation involved the activation of NF{kappa}B and increased expression of the antiapoptotic growth factor receptor, insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF1R).96 Interestingly, the proliferative effects of TRAIL on VSMCs were biphasic. Increased proliferation of VSMCs was dependent on DR4 and DcR1 and only observed at low concentrations (0.1 to 1 ng/mL), an effect no longer evident at higher subapoptotic concentrations (100 to 400 ng/mL).96


*    Conclusions
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowTNFR Family Signaling
up arrowRole of Death Receptors...
*Conclusions
down arrowReferences
 
TNFR signaling is implicated in both the development and consequences of atherosclerosis, and it is now clear that death receptor signaling initiates multiple pathways resulting in apoptosis or proliferation of cells. However, the multiple TNF-ligand/TNFRs, and different cell types that express them, make interpretation of studies with global administration or knockdown of particular TNF-ligand/TNFR in a complex disease such as atherosclerosis difficult to interpret. In contrast, future studies involving cell-selective administration or inhibition of specific TNFR and their ligands in animal models are required to analyze the contribution of TNF-ligands and TNFR in atherosclerosis and related disorders. However, the widespread expression and the profound effects of targeting TNFR in atherosclerosis may potentially lead to useful therapies for its prevention or treatment.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Sources of Funding

M.M.K. is supported by an NHMRC CJ Martin Fellowship and a UNSW Early Career Research Grant. M.R.B. is supported by a British Heart Foundation Chair grant.

Disclosures

None.


*    Footnotes
 
Original received June 17, 2008; final version accepted July 21, 2008.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowTNFR Family Signaling
up arrowRole of Death Receptors...
up arrowConclusions
*References
 
1. MacEwan DJ. TNF receptor subtype signalling: differences and cellular consequences. Cell Signal. 2002; 14: 477–492.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Dempsey PW, Doyle SE, He JQ, Cheng G. The signaling adaptors and pathways activated by TNF superfamily. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2003; 14: 193–209.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Chan FK, Chun HJ, Zheng L, Siegel RM, Bui KL, Lenardo MJ. A domain in TNF receptors that mediates ligand-independent receptor assembly and signaling. Science. 2000; 288: 2351–2354.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Kischkel FC, Lawrence DA, Chuntharapai A, Schow P, Kim KJ, Ashkenazi A. Apo2L/TRAIL-dependent recruitment of endogenous FADD and caspase-8 to death receptors 4 and 5. Immunity. 2000; 12: 611–620.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Lens SM, Kataoka T, Fortner KA, Tinel A, Ferrero I, MacDonald RH, Hahne M, Beermann F, Attinger A, Orbea HA, Budd RC, Tschopp J. The caspase 8 inhibitor c-FLIP(L) modulates T-cell receptor-induced proliferation but not activation-induced cell death of lymphocytes. Mol Cell Biol. 2002; 22: 5419–5433.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Kataoka T, Budd RC, Holler N, Thome M, Martinon F, Irmler M, Burns K, Hahne M, Kennedy N, Kovacsovics M, Tschopp J. The caspase-8 inhibitor FLIP promotes activation of NF-kappaB and Erk signaling pathways. Curr Biol. 2000; 10: 640–648.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Harper N, Hughes M, MacFarlane M, Cohen GM. Fas-associated death domain protein and caspase-8 are not recruited to the tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 signaling complex during tumor necrosis factor-induced apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278: 25534–25541.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Liu ZG, Hsu H, Goeddel DV, Karin M. Dissection of TNF receptor 1 effector functions: JNK activation is not linked to apoptosis while NF-kappaB activation prevents cell death. Cell. 1996; 87: 565–576.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Muhlenbeck F, Schneider P, Bodmer JL, Schwenzer R, Hauser A, Schubert G, Scheurich P, Moosmayer D, Tschopp J, Wajant H. The tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptors TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2 have distinct cross-linking requirements for initiation of apoptosis and are non-redundant in JNK activation. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 32208–32213.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Wang CY, Mayo MW, Korneluk RG, Goeddel DV, Baldwin ASJ. NF-kappaB antiapoptosis: induction of TRAF1 and TRAF2 and c-IAP1 and c- IAP2 to suppress caspase-8 activation. Science. 1998; 281: 1680–1683.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Stehlik C, de Martin R, Kumabashiri I, Schmid JA, Binder BR, Lipp J. Nuclear factor (NF)-kappaB-regulated X-chromosome-linked iap gene expression protects endothelial cells from tumor necrosis factor alpha- induced apoptosis. J Exp Med. 1998; 188: 211–216.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Micheau O, Lens S, Gaide O, Alevizopoulos K, Tschopp J. NF-kappaB signals induce the expression of c-FLIP. Mol Cell Biol. 2001; 21: 5299–5305.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Chen C, Edelstein LC, Gelinas C. The Rel/NF-kappaB family directly activates expression of the apoptosis inhibitor bcl-x(L). Mol Cell Biol. 2000; 20: 2687–2695.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Suzuki I, Martin S, Boursalian TE, Beers C, Fink PJ. Fas ligand costimulates the in vivo proliferation of CD8+ T cells. J Immunol. 2000; 165: 5537–5543.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Alderson MR, Armitage RJ, Maraskovsky E, Tough TW, Roux E, Schooley K, Ramsdell F, Lynch DH. Fas transduces activation signals in normal human T lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1993; 178: 2231–2235.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Blott EJ, Bossi G, Clark R, Zvelebil M, Griffiths GM. Fas ligand is targeted to secretory lysosomes via a proline-rich domain in its cytoplasmic tail. J Cell Sci. 2001; 114: 2405–2416.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Sun M, Ames KT, Suzuki I, Fink PJ. The cytoplasmic domain of Fas ligand costimulates TCR signals. J Immunol. 2006; 177: 1481–1491.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Secchiero P, Gonelli A, Carnevale E, Milani D, Pandolfi A, Zella D, Zauli G. TRAIL promotes the survival and proliferation of primary human vascular endothelial cells by activating the Akt and ERK pathways. Circulation. 2003; 107: 2250–2256.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Morel J, Audo R, Hahne M, Combe B. Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) induces rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblast proliferation through mitogen-activated protein kinases and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt. J Biol Chem. 2005; 280: 15709–15718.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Algeciras-Schimnich A, Shen L, Barnhart BC, Murmann AE, Burkhardt JK, Peter ME. Molecular ordering of the initial signaling events of CD95. Mol Cell Biol. 2002; 2002: 207–220.

21. Gajate C, Mollinedo F. The antitumor ether lipid ET-18-OCH(3) induces apoptosis through translocation and capping of Fas/CD95 into membrane rafts in human leukemic cells. Blood. 2001; 98: 3860–3863.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Song JH, Tse MC, Bellail A, Phuphanich S, Khuri F, Kneteman NM, Hao C. Lipid rafts and nonrafts mediate tumor necrosis factor related apoptosis-inducing ligand induced apoptotic and nonapoptotic signals in non small cell lung carcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 2007; 67: 6946–6955.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Miyaji M, Jin ZX, Yamaoka S, Amakawa R, Fukuhara S, Sato SB, Kobayashi T, Domae N, Mimori T, Bloom ET, Okazaki T, Umehara H. Role of membrane sphingomyelin and ceramide in platform formation for Fas-mediated apoptosis. J Exp Med. 2005; 202: 249–259.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Gajate C, Mollinedo F. Edelfosine and perifosine induce selective apoptosis in multiple myeloma by recruitment of death receptors and downstream signaling molecules into lipid rafts. Blood. 2007; 109: 711–719.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Hunter I, Nixon GF. Spatial compartmentalization of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor 1-dependent signaling pathways in human airway smooth muscle cells. Lipid rafts are essential for TNF-alpha-mediated activation of RhoA but dispensable for the activation of the NF-kappaB and MAPK pathways. J Biol Chem. 2006; 281: 34705–34715.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Mollinedo F, Gajate C. Fas/CD95 death receptor and lipid rafts: new targets for apoptosis-directed cancer therapy. Drug Resist Updat. 2006; 9: 51–73.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Lotocki G, Alonso OF, Dietrich WD, Keane RW. Tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 and its signaling intermediates are recruited to lipid rafts in the traumatized brain. J Neurosci. 2004; 24: 11010–11016.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Doan JE, Windmiller DA, Riches DW. Differential regulation of TNF-R1 signaling: lipid raft dependency of p42mapk/erk2 activation, but not NF-kappaB activation. J Immunol. 2004; 172: 7654–7660.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Jiang C, Yang YF, Cheng SH. Fas ligand gene therapy for vascular intimal hyperplasia. Curr Gene Ther. 2004; 4: 33–39.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Luo Z, Sata M, Nguyen T, Kaplan JM, Akita GY, Walsh K. Adenovirus-mediated delivery of fas ligand inhibits intimal hyperplasia after balloon injury in immunologically primed animals. Circulation. 1999; 99: 1776–1779.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Clarke MC, Figg N, Maguire JJ, Davenport AP, Goddard M, Littlewood TD, Bennett MR. Apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells induces features of plaque vulnerability in atherosclerosis. Nat Med. 2006; 12: 1075–1080.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Geng YJ, Henderson LE, Levesque EB, Muszynski M, Libby P. Fas is expressed in human atherosclerotic intima and promotes apoptosis of cytokine-primed human vascular smooth muscle cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997; 17: 2200–2208.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Geng YJ, Liao HS, Macgovern J. Expression of FasL in advanced human atherosclerotic lesions: implications for co-occurence of immunocytotoxicity and immune privilege. Circulation. 1998; 98: I-48.

34. Michowitz Y, Goldstein E, Roth A, Afek A, Abashidze A, Ben Gal Y, Keren G, George J. The involvement of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) in atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45: 1018–1024.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Sata M, Walsh K. Oxidized LDL activates fas-mediated endothelial cell apoptosis. J Clin Invest. 1998; 102: 1682–1689.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

36. Sato K, Niessner A, Kopecky SL, Frye RL, Goronzy JJ, Weyand CM. TRAIL-expressing T cells induce apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells in the atherosclerotic plaque. J Exp Med. 2006; 203: 239–250.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Schoppet M, Al-Fakhri N, Franke FE, Katz N, Barth PJ, Maisch B, Preissner KT, Hofbauer LC. Localization of osteoprotegerin, tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand, and receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand in Monckeberg’s sclerosis and atherosclerosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004; 89: 4104–4112.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Secchiero P, Candido R, Corallini F, Zacchigna S, Toffoli B, Rimondi E, Fabris B, Giacca M, Zauli G. Systemic tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand delivery shows antiatherosclerotic activity in apolipoprotein E-null diabetic mice. Circulation. 2006; 114: 1522–1530.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Shiraishi H, Toyozaki T, Tsukamoto Y, Saito T, Masuda Y, Hiroshima K, Ohwada H, Kobayashi N, Hiroe M. Antibody binding to fas ligand attenuates inflammatory cell infiltration and cytokine secretion, leading to reduction of myocardial infarct areas and reperfusion injury. Lab Invest. 2002; 82: 1121–1129.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

40. Wara AK, Mitsumata M, Yamane T, Kusumi Y, Yoshida Y. Gene Expression in Endothelial Cells and Intimal Smooth Muscle Cells in Atherosclerosis-Prone or Atherosclerosis-Resistant Regions of the Human Aorta. J Vasc Res. 2008; 45: 303–313.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

41. Zhang L, Peppel K, Sivashanmugam P, Orman ES, Brian L, Exum ST, Freedman NJ. Expression of tumor necrosis factor receptor-1 in arterial wall cells promotes atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007; 27: 1087–1094.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Geng YJ, Wu Q, Muszynski M, Hansson GK, Libby P. Apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells induced by in vitro stimulation with interferon-gamma, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and interleukin-1 beta. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996; 16: 19–27.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

43. Aprahamian T, Rifkin I, Bonegio R, Hugel B, Freyssinet JM, Sato K, Castellot JJJ, Walsh K. Impaired clearance of apoptotic cells promotes synergy between atherogenesis and autoimmune disease. J Exp Med. 2004; 199: 1121–1131.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

44. Schreyer SA, Peschon JJ, LeBoeuf RC. Accelerated atherosclerosis in mice lacking tumor necrosis factor receptor p55. J Biol Chem. 1996; 271: 26174–26178.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

45. Okura T, Watanabe S, Jiang Y, Nakamura M, Takata Y, Yang ZH, Kohara K, Kitami Y, Hiwada K. Soluble Fas ligand and atherosclerosis in hypertensive patients. J Hypertens. 2002; 20: 895–898.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

46. Shimizu M, Fukuo K, Nagata S, Suhara T, Okuro M, Fujii K, Higashino Y, Mogi M, Hatanaka Y, Ogihara T. Increased plasma levels of the soluble form of Fas ligand in patients with acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 39: 585–590.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

47. Feng X, Li H, Rumbin AA, Wang X, La Cava A, Brechtelsbauer K, Castellani LW, Witztum JL, Lusis AJ, Tsao BP. ApoE–/–Fas–/– C57BL/6 mice: a novel murine model simultaneously exhibits lupus nephritis, atherosclerosis, and osteopenia. J Lipid Res. 2007; 48: 794–805.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

48. Bråne'n L, Hovgaard L, Nitulescu M, Bengtsson E, Nilsson J, Jovinge S. Inhibition of tumor necrosis factor-alpha reduces atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E knockout mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24: 2137–2142.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

49. Schoppet M, Sattler AM, Schaefer JR, Hofbauer LC. Osteoprotegerin (OPG) and tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) levels in atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 2006; 184: 446–447.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

50. Lusis AJ. Atherosclerosis. Nature. 2000; 407: 233–241.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

51. Bochaton-Piallat ML, Gabbiani F, Redard M, Desmoulière A, Gabbiani G. Apoptosis participates in cellularity regulation during rat aortic intimal thickening. Am J Pathol. 1995; 146: 1059–1064.[Abstract]

52. Schneider P, Tschopp J. Apoptosis induced by death receptors. Pharm Acta Helv. 2000; 74: 281–286.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

53. Durand E, Scoazec A, Lafont A, Boddaert J, Al Hajzen A, Addad F, Mirshahi M, Desnos M, Tedgui A, Mallat Z. In vivo induction of endothelial apoptosis leads to vessel thrombosis and endothelial denudation: a clue to the understanding of the mechanisms of thrombotic plaque erosion. Circulation. 2004; 109: 2503–2506.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

54. Alladina SJ, Song JH, Davidge ST, Hao C, Easton AS. TRAIL-induced apoptosis in human vascular endothelium is regulated by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt through the short form of cellular FLIP and Bcl-2. J Vasc Res. 2005; 42: 337–347.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

55. Koide N, Morikawa A, Tumurkhuu G, Dagvadorj J, Hassan F, Islam S, Naiki Y, Mori I, Yoshida T, T. Y. Lipopolysaccharide and interferon-gamma enhance Fas-mediated cell death in mouse vascular endothelial cells via augmentation of Fas expression. Clin Exp Immunol. 2007; 150: 553–560.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

56. Li JH, Kirkiles-Smith NC, McNiff JM, Pober JS. TRAIL induces apoptosis and inflammatory gene expression in human endothelial cells. J Immunol. 2003; 171: 1526–1533.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

57. Luo D, Luo Y, He Y, Zhang H, Zhang R, Li X, Dobrucki WL, Sinusas AJ, Sessa WC, Min W. Differential functions of tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 and 2 signaling in ischemia-mediated arteriogenesis and angiogenesis. Am J Pathol. 2006; 169: 1886–1898.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

58. Sata M, Perlman H, Muruve DA, Silver M, Ikebe M, Libermann TA, Oettgen P, Walsh K. Fas ligand gene transfer to the vessel wall inhibits neointima formation and overrides the adenovirus-mediated T cell response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95: 1213–1217.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

59. Sugano M, Tsuchida K, Makino N. Effects of soluble TNF-alpha receptor 1 on apoptosis induced by oxidized LDL in endothelial cells. Mol Cell Biochem. 2004; 258: 57–63.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

60. Barath P, Fishbein MC, Cao J, Berenson J, Helfant RH, Forrester JS. Detection and localization of tumor necrosis factor in human atheroma. Am J Cardiol. 1990; 65: 297–302.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

61. Canault M, Leroyer AS, Peiretti F, Leseche G, Tedgui A, Bonardo B, Alessi MC, Boulanger CM, Nalbone G. Microparticles of human atherosclerotic plaques enhance the shedding of the tumor necrosis factor-alpha converting enzyme/ADAM17 substrates, tumor necrosis factor and tumor necrosis factor receptor-1. Am J Pathol. 2007; 171: 1713–1723.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

62. Sata M, Suhara T, Walsh K. Vascular endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells differ in expression of Fas and Fas ligand and in sensitivity to Fas ligand-induced cell death: implications for vascular disease and therapy. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000; 20: 309–316.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

63. Sata M, Walsh K. Endothelial cell apoptosis induced by oxidized LDL is associated with the down-regulation of the cellular caspase inhibitor FLIP. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273: 33103–33106.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

64. Secchiero P, Corallini F, di Iasio MG, Gonelli A, Barbarotto E, Zauli G. TRAIL counteracts the proadhesive activity of inflammatory cytokines in endothelial cells by down-modulating CCL8 and CXCL10 chemokine expression and release. Blood. 2005; 105: 3413–3419.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

65. Secchiero P, Gonelli A, Carnevale E, Corallini F, Rizzardi C, Zacchigna S, Melato M, Zauli G. Evidence for a proangiogenic activity of TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand. Neoplasia. 2004; 6: 364–373.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

66. Yang CR, Hsieh SL, Ho FM, Lin WW. Decoy receptor 3 increases monocyte adhesion to endothelial cells via NF-kappa B-dependent up-regulation of intercellular adhesion molecule-1, VCAM-1, and IL-8 expression. J Immunol. 2005; 174: 1647–1656.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

67. Imanishi T, Hano T, Nishio I, Han DK, Schwartz SM, Karsan A. Apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells is induced by Fas ligand derived from endothelial cells. Jpn Circ J. 2001; 65: 556–560.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

68. Yang J, Jones SP, Suhara T, Greer JJ, Ware PD, Nguyen NP, Perlman H, Nelson DP, Lefer DJ, Walsh K. Endothelial cell overexpression of fas ligand attenuates ischemia-reperfusion injury in the heart. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278: 15185–15191.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

69. Yang J, Sato K, Aprahamian T, Brown NJ, Hutcheson J, Bialik A, Perlman H, Walsh K. Endothelial overexpression of Fas ligand decreases atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24: 1466–1473.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

70. Hobbs AJ, Higgs A, Moncada S. Inhibition of nitric oxide synthase as a potential therapeutic target. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1999; 39: 191–220.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

71. Zauli G, Pandolfi A, Gonelli A, Di Pietro R, Guarnieri S, Ciabattoni G, Rana R, Vitale M, Secchiero P. Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) sequentially upregulates nitric oxide and prostanoid production in primary human endothelial cells. Circ Res. 2003; 92: 732–740.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

72. Di Pietro R, Mariggiò MA, Guarnieri S, Sancilio S, Giardinelli A, Di Silvestre S, Consoli A, Zauli G, Pandolfi A. Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) regulates endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activity and its localization within the human vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) in culture. J Cell Biochem. 2006; 97: 782–794.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

73. Libby P. Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Nature. 2002; 420: 868–874.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

74. Stoneman V, Braganza D, Figg N, Mercer J, Lang R, Goddard M, Bennett M. Monocyte/macrophage suppression in CD11b diphtheria toxin receptor transgenic mice differentially affects atherogenesis and established plaques. Circ Res. 2007; 100: 884–893.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

75. Gosling J, Slaymaker S, Gu L, Tseng S, Zlot CH, Young SG, Rollins BJ, Charo IF. MCP-1 deficiency reduces susceptibility to atherosclerosis in mice that overexpress human apolipoprotein B. J Clin Invest. 1999; 103: 773–778.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

76. Emeson EE, Shen ML, Bell CG, Qureshi A. Inhibition of atherosclerosis in CD4 T-cell-ablated and nude (nu/nu) C57BL/6 hyperlipidemic mice. Am J Pathol. 1996; 149: 675–685.[Abstract]

77. Kolodgie FD, Narula J, Burke AP, Haider N, Farb A, Hui-Liang Y, Smialek J, Virmani R. Localization of apoptotic macrophages at the site of plaque rupture in sudden coronary death. Am J Pathol. 2000; 157: 1259–1268.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

78. Hutter R, Valdiviezo C, Sauter BV, Savontaus M, Chereshnev I, Carrick FE, Bauriedel G, Luderitz B, Fallon JT, Fuster V, Badimon JJ. Caspase-3 and tissue factor expression in lipid-rich plaque macrophages: evidence for apoptosis as link between inflammation and atherothrombosis. Circulation. 2004; 109: 2001–2008.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

79. Tabas I. Consequences and therapeutic implications of macrophage apoptosis in atherosclerosis: the importance of lesion stage and phagocytic efficiency. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005; 25: 2255–2264.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

80. Mitra AK, Dhume AS, Agrawal DK. "Vulnerable plaques"–ticking of the time bomb. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2004; 82: 860–871.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

81. Kiener PA, Davis PM, Rankin BM, Klebanoff SJ, Ledbetter JA, Starling GC, Liles WC. Human monocytic cells contain high levels of intracellular Fas ligand: rapid release following cellular activation. J Immunol. 1997; 159: 1594–1598.[Abstract]

82. Kotani N, Fukuo K, Yasuda O, Sugimoto K, Katuya T, Takemura Y, Kawamoto H, Yokoi T, Suzuki A, Ogihara T. Fas ligand mRNA levels of circulating leukocytes reflect endothelial dysfunction in hyperlipidemic but not in non-hyperlipidemic patients. Hypertens Res. 2006; 29: 217–225.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

83. Boyle JJ, Bowyer DE, Weissberg PL, Bennett MR. Human blood-derived macrophages induce apoptosis in human plaque-derived vascular smooth muscle cells by Fas-ligand/Fas interactions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001; 21: 1402–1407.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

84. Boyle JJ, Weissberg PL, Bennett MR. Human macrophage-induced vascular smooth muscle cell apoptosis requires NO enhancement of Fas/Fas-L interactions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002; 22: 1624–1630.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

85. Krammer PH, Dhein J, Walczak H, Behrmann I, Mariani S, Matiba B, Fath M, Daniel PT, Knipping E, Westendorp MO, et al. The role of APO-1-mediated apoptosis in the immune system. Immunol Rev. 1994; 142: 175–191.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

86. Niinobu T, Fukuo K, Yasuda O, Tsubakimoto M, Mogi M, Nishimaki H, Morimoto S, Ogihara T. Negative feedback regulation of activated macrophages via Fas-mediated apoptosis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2000; 279: C504–509.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

87. Sata M, Luo Z, Walsh K. Fas ligand overexpression on allograft endothelium inhibits inflammatory cell infiltration and transplant-associated intimal hyperplasia. J Immunol. 2001; 166: 6964–6971.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

88. Schneider DB, Vassalli G, Wen S, Driscoll RM, Sassani AB, DeYoung MB, Linnemann R, Virmani R, Dichek DA. Expression of Fas Ligand in Arteries of Hypercholesterolemic Rabbits Accelerates Atherosclerotic Lesion Formation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000; 20: 298–308.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

89. Clarke MC, Littlewood TD, Figg N, Maguire JJ, Davenport AP, Goddard M, Bennett MR. Chronic apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells accelerates atherosclerosis and promotes calcification and medial degeneration. Circ Res. 2008; 102: 1529–1538.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

90. Imanishi T, Han DK, Hofstra L, Hano T, Nishio I, Liles WC, Gown AM, Schwartz SM. Apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells is induced by Fas ligand derived from monocytes/macrophage. Atherosclerosis. 2002; 161: 143–151.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

91. Li Y, Song YH, Mohler J, Delafontaine P. ANG II induces apoptosis of human vascular smooth muscle via extrinsic pathway involving inhibition of Akt phosphorylation and increased FasL expression. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006; 290: H2116–H2123.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

92. Rosner D, Stoneman V, Littlewood T, McCarthy N, Figg N, Wang Y, Tellides G, Bennett M. Interferon-gamma induces Fas trafficking and sensitization to apoptosis in vascular smooth muscle cells via a PI3K- and Akt-dependent mechanism. Am J Pathol. 2006; 168: 2054–2063.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

93. Kavurma MM, Santiago FS, Bonfoco E, Khachigian LM. Sp1 phosphorylation regulates apoptosis via extracellular FasL-Fas engagement. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 4964–4971.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

94. Bennett M, Macdonald K, Chan SW, Luzio JP, Simari R, Weissberg P. Cell surface trafficking of Fas: a rapid mechanism of p53-mediated apoptosis. Science. 1998; 282: 290–293.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

95. Kavurma MM, Bobryshev Y, Khachigian LM. Ets-1 positively regulates Fas ligand transcription via cooperative interactions with Sp1. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277: 36244–36252.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

96. Kavurma MM, Schoppet M, Bobryshev YV, Khachigian LM, Bennett MR. Trail stimulates proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells via activation of NF-kappa B and induction of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor. J Biol Chem. In press.

97. Gochuico BR, Zhang J, Ma BY, Marshak-Rothstein A, Fine A. TRAIL expression in vascular smooth muscle. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2000; 278: L1045–L1050.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

98. Di Pietro R, Zauli G. Emerging non-apoptotic functions of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)/Apo2L. J Cell Physiol. 2004; 201: 331–340.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

99. Secchiero P, Zerbinati C, Rimondi E, Corallini F, Milani D, Grill V, Forti G, Capitani S, Zauli G. TRAIL promotes the survival, migration and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2004; 61: 1965–1974.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

100. Matter CM, Chadjichristos CE, Meier P, von Lukowicz T, Lohmann C, Schuler PK, Zhang D, Odermatt B, Hofmann E, Brunner T, Kwak BR, Luscher TF. Role of endogenous Fas (CD95/Apo-1) ligand in balloon-induced apoptosis, inflammation, and neointima formation. Circulation. 2006; 113: 1879–1887.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

101. Zhou X, Nicoletti A, Elhage R, Hansson GK. Transfer of CD4(+) T cells aggravates atherosclerosis in immunodeficient apolipoprotein E knockout mice. Circulation. 2000; 102: 2919–2922.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

102. Lee T, Chau L. Fas/Fas ligand-mediated death pathway is involved in oxLDL-induced apoptosis in vascular smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2001; 280: C709–C718.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

103. Li D, Yang B, Mehta JL. Ox-LDL induces apoptosis in human coronary artery endothelial cells: role of PKC, PTK, bcl-2, and Fas. Am J Physiol. 1998; 275: H568–H576.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

104. Yamaoka-Tojo M, Yamaguchi S, Nitobe J, Abe S, Inoue S, Nozaki N, Okuyama M, Sata M, Kubota I, Nakamura H, Tomoike H. Dual response to Fas ligation in human endothelial cells: apoptosis and induction of chemokines, interleukin-8 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. Coron Artery Dis. 2003; 14: 89–94.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

105. Tanaka F, Kawakami A, Tamai M, Nakamura H, Iwanaga N, Izumi Y, Arima K, Aratake K, Huang M, Kamachi M, Ida H, Origuchi T, Eguchi K. IFN-gamma/JAK/STAT pathway-induced inhibition of DR4 and DR5 expression on endothelial cells is cancelled by cycloheximide-sensitive mechanism: novel finding of cycloheximide-regulating death receptor expression. Int J Mol Med. 2005; 15: 833–839.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

106. Inagaki Y, Yamagishi S, Amano S, Okamoto T, Koga K, Makita Z. Interferon-gamma-induced apoptosis and activation of THP-1 macrophages. Life Sci. 2002; 71: 2499–2508.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

107. Corallini F, Celeghini C, Rizzardi C, Pandolfi A, Di Silvestre S, Vaccarezza M, Zauli G. Insulin down-regulates TRAIL expression in vascular smooth muscle cells both in vivo and in vitro. J Cell Physiol. 2007; 212: 89–95.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

108. Niessner A, Sato K, Chaikof EL, Colmegna I, Goronzy JJ, Weyand CM. Pathogen-sensing plasmacytoid dendritic cells stimulate cytotoxic T-cell function in the atherosclerotic plaque through interferon-alpha. Circulation. 2006; 114: 2482–2489.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

109. Suhara T, Fukuo K, Yasuda O, Tsubakimoto M, Takemura Y, Kawamoto H, Yokoi T, Mogi M, Kaimoto T, Ogihara T. Homocysteine enhances endothelial apoptosis via upregulation of Fas-mediated pathways. Hypertension. 2004; 43: 1208–1213.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

110. Fukuo K, Nakahashi T, Nomura S, Hata S, Suhara T, Shimizu M, Tamatani M, Morimoto S, Kitamura Y, Ogihara T. Possible participation of Fas-mediated apoptosis in the mechanism of atherosclerosis. Gerontology. 1997; 43 Suppl 1: 35–42.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
N. Pamir, T. S. McMillen, K. J. Kaiyala, M. W. Schwartz, and R. C. LeBoeuf
Receptors for Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} Play a Protective Role against Obesity and Alter Adipose Tissue Macrophage Status
Endocrinology, September 1, 2009; 150(9): 4124 - 4134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
N. Y. Tan, J.-M. Li, R. Stocker, and L. M. Khachigian
Angiotensin II-Inducible Smooth Muscle Cell Apoptosis Involves the Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor, GATA-6 Activation, and FasL-Fas Engagement
Circ. Res., August 28, 2009; 105(5): 422 - 430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/10/1694    most recent
ATVBAHA.107.155143v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kavurma, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kavurma, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, M. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Apoptosis
Right arrow Cell signalling/signal transduction
Right arrow Smooth muscle proliferation and differentiation