Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2007;27:949-954
Published online before print February 1, 2007, doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000259360.33203.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/4/949    most recent
01.ATV.0000259360.33203.00v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fujiyoshi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kanaide, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fujiyoshi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kanaide, H.
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2007;27:949.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Atherosclerosis and Lipoproteins

Plasmin Induces Endothelium-Dependent Nitric Oxide–Mediated Relaxation in the Porcine Coronary Artery

Tetsuhiro Fujiyoshi; Katsuya Hirano; Mayumi Hirano; Junji Nishimura; Shosuke Takahashi; Hideo Kanaide

From the Division of Molecular Cardiology (T.F., K.H., M.H., J.N., H.K.), Research Institute of Angiocardiology; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care (S.T.), Graduate School of Medical Sciences; and Kyushu University, 21st Century Centers of Excellence Program on Lifestyle-Related Diseases (H.K.), Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Correspondence to Hideo Kanaide, MD, PhD, Professor, Division of Molecular Cardiology, Research Institute of Angiocardiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan. E-mail kanaide{at}molcar.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Objective— Plasmin is a key enzyme in fibrinolysis. We attempted to determine the possible role of plasmin in the regulation of vascular tone, while also investigating the mechanism of plasmin-induced vasorelaxation.

Methods and Results— In porcine coronary artery, plasmin induced an endothelium-dependent relaxation. This relaxing effect was mostly abolished by a proteinase inhibitor, a plasmin inhibitor, or a nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitor. The preceding stimulation with plasmin significantly inhibited the subsequent relaxation induced by thrombin but not that induced by proteinase-activated receptor-1–activating peptide. The relaxation induced by trypsin and substance P remained unaffected by the preceding plasmin stimulation. The pretreatment with plasmin, thrombin, or trypsin significantly attenuated the plasmin-induced relaxation. In porcine coronary artery endothelial cells (PCAECs) and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), plasmin induced a transient elevation in the cytosolic Ca2+ concentrations ([Ca2+]i). The preceding stimulation with plasmin inhibited the subsequent [Ca2+]i elevation induced by thrombin but not that induced by trypsin. In PCAECs, plasmin concentration-dependently induced NO production.

Conclusions— The present study demonstrated, for the first time, that plasmin induced an endothelium-dependent NO-mediated relaxation in the porcine coronary artery, while also showing plasmin to specifically inactivate the thrombin receptor.

Plasmin is a key enzyme in fibrinolysis, although it is known to exert cellular effects. The present study demonstrated, for the first time, that plasmin induced an endothelium-dependent NO-mediated relaxation in the porcine coronary artery, while also showing plasmin to specifically inactivate the thrombin receptor.


Key Words: plasmin • proteinase-activated receptor • vasorelaxation • nitric oxide • endothelium


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Proteinases involved in the blood coagulation cascade not only play an important role in hemostasis but also exert various vascular effects such as the regulation of the vascular tone, tissue remodeling, and angiogenesis.1,2 Proteinase-activated receptors (PARs) play a major role in mediating such cellular effects of proteinases.3–6 PARs belong to a unique family of G protein–coupled receptor.3 Four members of PARs have been cloned. PAR1, PAR3, and PAR4 serve as receptors for thrombin, whereas PAR1, PAR2, and PAR4 serve as receptors for trypsin.3 The activation of PAR is initiated by the proteolytic cleavage at the specific site of the extracellular domain.3 Under physiological conditions, thrombin and trypsin mainly have been reported to induce an endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation in various type of blood vessel.5–7 We have previously reported that thrombin and trypsin induced a transient elevation of cytosolic Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) in vascular and aortic valve endothelial cells8–10 and an endothelium-dependent relaxation in the porcine coronary artery.8,9,10,11

Plasmin, as a key enzyme in fibrinolysis, has been reported to induce the cell migration in Chinese hamster ovary cells,12 the cell proliferation in the murine thoracic aorta smooth muscle cells,13 and an increase in the expression of Cyr61, a growth factor-like gene, in fibroblast.14 These reports suggested PAR1 to mediate the cellular effects of plasmin. However, the roles of plasmin in the regulation of vascular tone still remain to be determined. Plasmin has been reported to cleave PAR1 at the C-terminal side of the tethered ligand region, thus inactivating the responsiveness of PAR1.15,16 Plasmin has been shown to cleave the extracellular region of PAR2 at the N-terminal side of the trypsin cleavage site as well as the trypsin site,16 although it was also shown to attenuate the subsequent PAR2-mediated [Ca2+]i elevation in the rat brain capillary endothelial cell.17 Therefore, the receptor(s) that mediate the cellular effect of plasmin still remain controversial. The NO-dependent relaxant effect of plasmin has been reported in rat arteries.18 However, the precise mechanism for the plasmin-induced relaxation and the receptors involved still remain to be elucidated.

In the present study, we aimed to determine the role of plasmin in the regulation of vascular tone and investigated the mechanism of plasmin-induced vasorelaxation in the porcine coronary artery. The effects of plasmin on [Ca2+]i and the production of NO were also determined in the cultured endothelial cells. The present study demonstrated, for the first time, that plasmin induced an endothelium-dependent NO-mediated relaxation in the porcine coronary artery, whereas it inhibited the endothelium-dependent relaxation induced by thrombin.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The contractile responses were evaluated using the isolated strips of the porcine right coronary artery, as previously described.19 The changes in [Ca2+]i were monitored in the fura-2–loaded porcine coronary artery endothelial cells (PCAECs) and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), as previously described.11,20,21 The NO production was monitored in PCAECs using diaminorhosamine-4M fluorometry, as previously described.22

An expanded Materials and Methods section can be found in the online data supplement at http://atvb.ahajournals.org.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Plasmin-Induced Endothelium-Dependent Relaxation in the Porcine Coronary Artery
In the porcine coronary arterial strips, both with and without an endothelium upon exposure to 30 nmol/L U46619 (a thromboxane A2 analog), the tension rapidly increased as it reached steady state, and it remained at this level for more than 15 minutes. The application of 300 nmol/L plasmin induced a rapid and transient relaxation during U46619-induced contraction (Figure 1a). After reaching its lowest level, the tension returned to a level similar to that seen before the application of plasmin. The evaluation of the concentration-dependent effects of plasmin indicated that plasmin induced a significant relaxation at 100 nmol/L and higher concentrations. The extent of the relaxation obtained with 300 nmol/L plasmin was 52.1±4.4% relaxation (n=4) (Figure 1b). The concentration of the stock solution of plasmin (in 50% glycerol) was 150 µmol/L. It was thus impractical to use final concentrations higher than 300 nmol/L because the final concentrations of glycerol became higher than 0.1%. In the absence of an endothelium, plasmin has no significant relaxation (Figure 1b). The requirement of the proteinase activity for the relaxing effect of plasmin was examined (Figure 1c). The 10-minute preincubation of plasmin with a serine proteinase inhibitor, 4-aminidophenyl methane-sulfonyl fluoride (p-APMSF) or a plasmin inhibitor, tranexamic acid, substantially abrogated the relaxing effect of plasmin. In the presence of an NO synthase inhibitor, N{omega}-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), the plasmin-induced relaxation was almost completely abolished (Figure 1c). p-APMSF and tranexamic acid had no effect on the U46619-induced contraction and the relaxation induced by 30 µmol/L sodium nitroprusside (data not shown). The similar relaxant effect of plasmin was also observed during the precontraction induced by 118 mmol/L K+ or 30 µmol/L prostaglandin (PG) F2{alpha} (data not shown). Thrombin and trypsin also concentration-dependently induced a transient relaxation with an intact endothelium (Figure I in the online data supplement). These relaxations were abolished by p-APMSF, but they were resistant to tranexamic acid. These observations are consistent with the findings of our previous reports.8,10


Figure 1
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Endothelium-dependent relaxation induced by plasmin in the porcine coronary artery. a and b, Representative traces (a) and concentration-response curves (b) showing the effects of plasmin on the contraction induced by 30 nmol/L U46619. c, Summary of the relaxations induced by 300 nmol/L plasmin in the absence (control) and presence of 10 µmol/L p-APMSF, 100 µmol/L tranexamic acid (TXA), or 100 µmol/L L-NAME with an intact endothelium. When the effects of p-APMSF and TXA on the plasmin-induced relaxation were examined, plasmin had been preincubated with p-APMSF or TXA for 10 minutes in a concentrated small volume, and then the mixture was applied to the organ bath to obtain the final concentrations indicated above. The levels of tension at rest and during the sustained phase of the U46619-induced contraction just before the applications of plasmin were assigned as values of 100% and 0% relaxation, respectively. The data are the mean±SEM. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 vs the values without endothelium (b); *P<0.01 vs the control (c).

Inhibition of Thrombin-Induced Relaxation by the Plasmin Pretreatment in Porcine Coronary Artery
To determine the possible involvement of PARs in the plasmin-induced relaxation, we examined the cross-desensitization between plasmin and thrombin or trypsin. After the 20-minute treatment with plasmin at the indicated concentrations, the strips were precontracted with U46619 in the absence of plasmin, and then consecutively stimulated with 3 U/mL thrombin, 100 nmol/L trypsin, and 100 nmol/L substance P (Figure 2a). Substance P was used as a control stimulation to induce an endothelium-dependent relaxation in the porcine coronary artery. The level of the 30 nmol/L U46119-induced contraction after the pretreatment with plasmin (137.6±9.2%, n=5) did not differ from that obtained without the pretreatment with plasmin (130.0±12.1%, n=5). The preceding stimulation with thrombin had no significant effect on the subsequent relaxation induced by trypsin (supplemental Figure Ic versus Figure 2a). The preceding stimulation with thrombin and trypsin had no significant influence on the substance P–induced relaxation (data not shown).


Figure 2
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Effect of plasmin pretreatment on the subsequent relaxations induced by thrombin, trypsin, substance P, and TFLLR-NH2 in the porcine coronary artery. a and b, Representative traces showing the relaxation induced by consecutive applications of 3 U/mL thrombin, 100 nmol/L trypsin, and 100 nmol/L substance P during the contraction induced by 30 nmol/L U46619, without (a) and with (b) 20-minute pretreatment with 300 nmol/L plasmin. c, Summary of the concentration-dependent effects of plasmin on the subsequent relaxations induced 3 U/mL thrombin, 100 nmol/L trypsin, and 100 nmol/L substance P. d, Summary of the relaxations induced by 3 U/mL thrombin during the contraction induced by 30 nmol/L U46619, without (control) and with the 20-minute pretreatment with 300 nmol/L plasmin in the absence (plasmin) or presence of 10 µmol/L p-APMSF (+p-APMSF) or 100 µmol/L tranexamic acid (+TXA). Plasmin had been preincubated with p-APMSF or TXA for 10 minutes in a concentrated small volume, and then the mixture was applied to the organ bath so as to obtain the final concentrations indicated above. e and f, Representative traces and a summary of the relaxation induced by 10 µmol/L TFLLR-NH2 during the 30 nmol/L U46619-induced contraction, without (control) and with the 20-minute pretreatment with 300 nmol/L plasmin or 10 µmol/L TFLLR-NH2. The levels of tension at the rest and during the sustained phase of the U46619-induced contraction just before the application of plasmin (d) and TFLLR-NH2 (e and f) were assigned values of 100% and 0% relaxation, respectively. The data are the mean±SEM. *P<0.05, **P<0.01; n.s., not significantly different vs the values obtained without the plasmin pretreatment (c) and the control (d and f).

Pretreatment with 300 nmol/L plasmin significantly attenuated the thrombin-induced relaxation in comparison to that seen without the plasmin treatment, whereas the relaxations induced by trypsin and substance P remained unaffected (Figure 2a and 2b). A significant attenuation of the thrombin-induced relaxation was observed with 100 nmol/L and 300 nmol/L plasmin (Figure 2c). The longer pretreatment with plasmin did not cause greater inhibition in comparison to that seen with 20-minute pretreatment (data not shown). The inhibitory effect of plasmin on the thrombin-induced relaxation was abolished by the pretreatment of plasmin with p-APMSF (Figure 2d). However, tranexamic acid had no significant effect on the inhibitory effect of plasmin. A PAR1 activating peptide TFLLR-NH2 (10 µmol/L) induced a transient endothelium-dependent relaxation, to the similar extent to that obtained with 3 U/mL thrombin (Figure 2e and 2f). The pretreatment with 300 nmol/L plasmin had no significant effect on the relaxation induced by TFLLR-NH2, whereas the pretreatment with TFLLR-NH2 slightly but significantly attenuated the relaxation induced by the second application of the TFLLR-NH2 (Figure 2e and 2f).

Effects of Pretreatment With Thrombin and Trypsin on the Plasmin-Induced Relaxation in the Porcine Coronary Artery
We next examined the effects of the pretreatment with thrombin and trypsin on the plasmin-induced relaxation according to a similar protocol to that used in Figure 2. The pretreatment with thrombin or trypsin had no significant effect on the level of the U46619-induced contraction (data not shown). When the strips were pretreated with 3 U/mL thrombin or 100 nmol/L trypsin for 20 minutes, and then precontracted by U46619 in the absence of thrombin and trypsin, the subsequent application of the same stimulation failed to induce any relaxations (Figure 3a and 3b). The pretreatment with 300 nmol/L plasmin, 3 U/mL thrombin, and 100 nmol/L trypsin significantly but, only partly, attenuated the subsequent relaxation induced by plasmin (Figure 3c). The major part of the plasmin-induced relaxation was thus resistant to these pretreatments (Figure 3c).


Figure 3
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Effect of the pretreatment with plasmin, thrombin, or trypsin on the subsequent relaxations in the porcine coronary artery. a and b, Summaries of the relaxations induced by 3 U/mL thrombin (a) and 100 nmol/L trypsin (b) during the 30 nmol/L U46619-induced contraction, with (+) and without (–) the 20-minute pretreatment with 3 U/mL thrombin (a) and 100 nmol/L trypsin (b), respectively, and the relaxation induced by 300 nmol/L plasmin (c) during the 30 nmol/L U46619-induced contraction, without (control) and with the 20-minute pretreatment with 300 nmol/L plasmin, 3 U/mL thrombin, or 100 nmol/L trypsin. The level of 0% and 100% relaxation was assigned as in Figure 1. The data are the mean±SEM (n=4 to 6). *P<0.05, **P<0.01 vs the control.

Negligible Involvement of Any Production of Vasoactive Peptides and Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 Receptor in the Plasmin-Induced Relaxation
The observations in Figure 3 suggested that PAR1 to 4 play a negligible role, if any, in the plasmin-induced relaxation. Alternative possibility is that plasmin proteolytically generated vasoactive peptides or proteolytically activated the insulin receptor or insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor, thereby inducing the relaxation.23,24 Insulin and insulin-like growth factor 1 were reported to induce NO production and an endothelium-dependent relaxation.25 To investigate the involvement of the proteolytic generation of vasoactive peptides in the plasmin-induced relaxation, we conducted a bath-transfer experiment (Figure 4) as previously reported.26 After 300 nmol/L plasmin was applied during the U46619-induced contraction, p-APMSF was added to the bath at a final concentration of 10 µmol/L to terminate the proteolytic activity of plasmin (Figure 4a). After the 10-minute incubation, the organ bath solution was transferred to the reporter tissue. The transferred bath solution did not induce any relaxation (Figure 4b). However, when the donor tissue was first relaxed with 100 nmol/L substance P, p-APMSF was added, and then the bath solution was transferred to the reporter tissue, and the bath solution induced a relaxation similar to that seen in the donor tissue (Figure 4c and 4d). The second possibility was ruled out based on the observation that 10 µmol/L AG538, an inhibitor of insulin and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptors, had no significant effect on the plasmin-induced relaxation (data not shown).


Figure 4
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Bath-transfer experiment. During the 30 nmol/L U46619-induced contraction, 300 nmol/L plasmin (a) or 100 nmol/L substance P (c) was applied to the donor arteries. A serine proteinase inhibitor, p-APMSF, was then added to the final concentration of 10 µmol/L. After a 10-minute incubation, the organ bath solution was transferred to the reporter tissue (b and d).

Effect of Plasmin on the [Ca2+]i Elevation Induced by Thrombin and Trypsin in Endothelial Cells
The inhibitory effect of plasmin on the thrombin-induced relaxation suggested the endothelial cells to be a site of crosstalk between plasmin and thrombin. We thus directly examined the effect of plasmin on the [Ca2+]i elevations induced by thrombin and trypsin in endothelial cells (Figure 5). Plasmin induced a concentration-dependent, transient elevation of [Ca2+]i at 100 nmol/L and higher concentrations in both PCAECs and HUVECs (Figure 5b and 5d through 5f). The plasmin-induced [Ca2+]i elevation was also abolished by the pretreatment of plasmin with p-APMSF (data not shown). Thrombin (3 U/mL) induced a transient [Ca2+]i elevation both in PCAECs and HUVECs, whereas trypsin (100 nmol/L) induced a significant [Ca2+]i elevation in only HUVECs (Figure 5a and 5c). The preceding stimulation with plasmin concentration-dependently inhibited the subsequent [Ca2+]i elevation induced by thrombin in both PCAECs and HUVECs (Figure 5e and 5f). However, it had no significant effect on the response to 100 nmol/L trypsin in HUVECs (Figure 5f). The addition of 30 nmol/L U46619, as in the protocol of Figure 2, did not affect the inhibitory effect of plasmin on the thrombin-induced [Ca2+]i elevation (data not shown).


Figure 5
View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. Effects of plasmin on [Ca2+]i in the cultured endothelial cells. a through d, Representative traces showing the changes in [Ca2+]i induced by 300 nmol/L plasmin, 3 U/mL thrombin, and 100 nmol/L trypsin in PCAECs (a and b) and HUVECs (c and d). e and f, Summaries of the concentration-response curves of the plasmin-induced [Ca2+]i elevation (plasmin) and the concentration-dependent effect of plasmin on the subsequent responses to 3 U/mL thrombin or 100 nmol/L trypsin in PCAECs (e) and HUVECs (f). In PCAECs, trypsin induced a negligible effect on [Ca2+]i (a and b). The effect of plasmin on the trypsin-induced [Ca2+]i elevation was thus not evaluated in e. The levels of [Ca2+]i obtained at rest and at the maximum elevation induced by 50 µmol/L ionomycin were assigned values of 0% and 100%, respectively. The data are mean±SEM. {dagger}P<0.01 vs the resting level; *P<0.01 vs the [Ca2+]i level obtained with 3 U/mL thrombin without plasmin pretreatment.

NO Production in Response to Plasmin in PCAECs
Diaminorhosamine-4M fluorometry revealed plasmin to induce NO production in the concentrations similar to those required to induce vasorelaxation (supplemental Figure II). The plasmin-induced NO production was partly inhibited in the 1,2-bis(2-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N'N'-tetraacetic acid (BAPTA)-loaded cells (data not shown), thus suggesting a link between plasmin-induced [Ca2+]i elevation and NO production.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The present study demonstrated, for the first time, that plasmin induces an endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation in the porcine coronary artery and [Ca2+]i elevation and NO production in the cultured endothelial cells. The plasmin-induced vasorelaxation was completely abolished in the absence of endothelium or in the presence of L-NAME. Plasmin induced NO production in the cultured endothelial cells in a similar concentration range to that required to induce vasorelaxation. These observations thus suggested that the endothelium-derived NO played a major role in mediating the plasmin-induced relaxation. In the porcine coronary artery, we have previously reported the endothelium-derived NO and hyperpolarization to be the major mechanisms mediating the relaxation induced by thrombin and trypsin.8,11 Others have also indicated that endothelium-derived NO and hyperpolarization are responsible for the thrombin and trypsin-induced relaxations observed in the human, porcine, and dog coronary artery and rat aorta.27–29 In this respect, the plasmin-induced relaxation is distinct from that induced by thrombin and trypsin.

The identity of the receptor that mediates the plasmin-induced relaxation still remains to be determined. Our observations that the relaxing effect of plasmin was abolished by p-APMSF and tranexamic acid indicated that the proteolytic activity of plasmin was required for its relaxing effect, thus suggesting that a mechanism similar to that of PARs may thus be involved in the plasmin-induced relaxation. Plasmin is listed as an activating proteinase for PAR1,2 although it is also listed as an inactivating proteinase for PAR1.4,5 Plasmin has been shown to cleave the recombinant proteins corresponding to the extracellular domain of PAR1 mainly at the C-terminal side of the ligand region, although plasmin also cleaved it at the same site as that cleaved by thrombin.15,16 In the present study, the greater part of the plasmin-induced relaxation was resistant to the preceding stimulation with thrombin or trypsin, whereas the relaxation induced by thrombin and trypsin was almost completely abolished. These observations thus suggested that the receptors for thrombin and trypsin played only a minor role in the plasmin-induced relaxation. Some other receptors are thus suggested to be involved in the plasmin-induced relaxation. On the contrary, the preceding stimulation with plasmin significantly attenuated the thrombin-induced vasorelaxation and the [Ca2+]i elevation in the cultured endothelial cells, although it had no significant effect on the trypsin-induced vasorelaxation and the [Ca2+]i elevation. These observations thus suggested that plasmin inactivated the thrombin receptor, while having no significant effect on the trypsin receptor. Such an inactivating effect of plasmin on thrombin receptor is consistent with the effect of plasmin on the cleavage of PAR1.15,16 It should be noted that the inactivating effect of plasmin on the thrombin receptor was resistant, whereas the relaxing effect of plasmin was sensitive to tranexamic acid. Both effects of plasmin, however, were inhibited by p-APMSF, an irreversible proteinase inhibitor.30 The inhibitory effect of tranexamic acid on plasmin is considered to be attributable to the interference of the interaction between plasmin and its substrates but not caused by the direct inhibition of the proteolytic activity.31 The differential sensitivity toward tranexamic acid thus supports the notion that the receptor mediating the relaxing effect of plasmin is distinct from the thrombin receptor.

The currently known PARs cannot account for the plasmin-induced relaxation. An atypical PAR may be involved in the plasmin-induced relaxation. Indeed, such an atypical PAR has been proposed for trypsin.27 We have also proposed the possible involvement of a novel member of PAR in the trypsin-induced rat myometrial contraction.26,32 However, proposing such PAR-like mechanism for the effect of plasmin is apparently inconsistent with the fact that the plasmin-induced relaxation was mostly resistant to the preceding stimulation with plasmin. In contrast, the relaxation induced by thrombin and trypsin was almost completely abolished by the preceding same stimulation, which is consistent with the mechanism of PAR.3,4 However, such proteolytic inactivation is also a concentration-dependent phenomenon, as we have reported for the inactivating effect of trypsin on the thrombin receptor.9 It is thus possible that the 300 nmol/L plasmin was insufficient to cause the complete inhibition of the subsequent response to plasmin. In this case, the PAR-like mechanism may thus be involved in the plasmin-induced relaxation, and the partial attenuation of the relaxant effect of plasmin by the preceding stimulation with plasmin is considered to be attributable to the partial proteolytic inactivation of the putative plasmin receptor. The possibility of the proteolytic production of some vasoactive peptides by plasmin was not supported by the bath transfer experiments. The possible involvement of the proteolytic activation of insulin receptor was also ruled out. As a result, a novel member of PARs is thus suggested to mediate the plasmin-induced relaxation.

It has been reported that the plasma concentration of plasmin could increase from 5 to 10 nmol/L under basal conditions, up to 300 nmol/L under such pathophysiological conditions as endotoxin shock, vascular remodeling, or wound healing.14,33 Therefore, the concentrations of plasmin required to induce NO production and vasorelaxation could be achievable in situ. The observed plasmin-induced NO-mediated vasorelaxation is thus operable under either physiological or pathophysiological conditions. It is well known that the activation of PARs induces an endothelium-dependent relaxation in the isolated arteries.3–6 A limited number of studies demonstrate that the activation of PAR1 or PAR2 increases blood flow in vivo and also suggest a possible link between the in vitro observation of the endothelium-dependent relaxation and the in vivo flow regulation.34,35 It is thus conceivable that the relaxant effect of plasmin may be linked to the flow regulation. However, the in vivo role of the relaxant effect of plasmin remains to be investigated. An indication of our discovery is that plasmin can induce cellular effects in vascular endothelial cells. Thrombin is known to induce not only a transient endothelium-dependent relaxation but also the phenotypic conversion to the proinflammatory phenotype in vascular endothelial cells, thus contributing to the pathogenesis of vascular diseases.36 Our discovery of the endothelial action of plasmin may thus imply such a role for plasmin. However, this possibility remains to be elucidated.

In conclusion, the present study demonstrated, for the first time, that plasmin induced an endothelium-dependent NO-mediated relaxation in the porcine coronary artery, while also showing plasmin to inactivate the receptor for thrombin. The identity of a putative plasmin receptor mediating the NO production and the relaxing effect remains to be elucidated. Plasmin is a key enzyme in fibrinolysis, thus antagonizing the thrombotic effect of thrombin. The present study thus proposes a novel function for plasmin as a regulator of vascular tone, while also proposing a new aspect of the interaction between plasmin and thrombin. Plasmin is therefore suggested to antagonize not only the thrombotic effect of thrombin but also the cellular effect of thrombin at the receptor level.


*    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Brian Quinn for linguistic comments and help with the manuscript.

Sources of Funding

This study was supported, in part, by grants from the 21st Century Centers of Excellence Program, Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (nos. 17590222, 17590744, 17790493), Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan; and the Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research.

Disclosures

None.


*    Footnotes
 
Original received June 28, 2006; final version accepted January 17, 2007.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Moser M, Patterson C. Thrombin and vascular development: a sticky subject. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23: 922–930.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Major CD, Santulli RJ, Derian CK, Andrade-Gordon P. Extracellular mediators in atherosclerosis and thrombosis: lessons from thrombin receptor knockout mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23: 931–939.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Macfarlane SR, Seatter MJ, Kanke T, Hunter GD, Plevin R. Proteinase-activated receptors. Pharmacol Rev. 2001; 53: 245–282.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Hollenberg MD, Compton SJ. International Union of Pharmacology. XXVIII. Proteinase-activated receptors. Pharmacol Rev. 2002; 54: 203–217.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Steinberg SF. The cardiovascular actions of protease-activated receptors. Mol Pharmacol. 2005; 67: 2–11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Hirano K, Kanaide H. Role of protease-activated receptors in the vascular system. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2003; 10: 211–225.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Derkach DN, Ihara E, Hirano K, Nishimura J, Takahashi S, Kanaide H. Thrombin causes endothelium-dependent biphasic regulation of vascular tone in the porcine renal interlobar artery. Br J Pharmacol. 2000; 131: 1635–1642.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Mizuno O, Hirano K, Nishimura J, Kubo C, Kanaide H. Mechanism of endothelium-dependent relaxation induced by thrombin in the pig coronary artery. Eur J Pharmacol. 1998; 351: 67–77.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Nakayama T, Hirano K, Shintani Y, Nishimura J, Nakatsuka A, Kuga H, Takahashi S, Kanaide H. Unproductive cleavage and the inactivation of protease-activated receptor-1 by trypsin in vascular endothelial cells. Br J Pharmacol. 2003; 138: 121–130.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Nakayama T, Hirano K, Hirano M, Nishimura J, Kuga H, Nakamura K, Takahashi S, Kanaide H. Inactivation of protease-activated receptor-1 by proteolytic removal of the ligand region in vascular endothelial cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 2004; 68: 23–32.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Nakayama T, Hirano K, Nishimura J, Takahashi S, Kanaide H. Mechanism of trypsin-induced endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation in the porcine coronary artery. Br J Pharmacol. 2001; 134: 815–826.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Majumdar M, Tarui T, Shi B, Akakura N, Ruf W, Takada Y. Plasmin-induced migration requires signaling through protease-activated receptor 1 and integrin {alpha}9ß1. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279: 37528–37534.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Nicholl SM, Roztocil E, Galaria II, Davies MG. Plasmin induces smooth muscle cell proliferation. J Surg Res. 2005; 127: 39–45.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Mandal SK, Rao LV, Tran TT, Pendurthi UR. A novel mechanism of plasmin-induced mitogenesis in fibroblasts. J Thromb Haemost. 2005; 3: 163–169.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Kuliopulos A, Covic L, Seeley SK, Sheridan PJ, Helin J, Costello CE. Plasmin desensitization of the PAR1 thrombin receptor: kinetics, sites of truncation, and implications for thrombolytic therapy. Biochemistry. 1999; 38: 4572–4585.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Loew D, Perrault C, Morales M, Moog S, Ravanat C, Schuhler S, Arcone R, Pietropaolo C, Cazenave JP, van Dorsselaer A, Lanza F. Proteolysis of the exodomain of recombinant protease-activated receptors: prediction of receptor activation or inactivation by MALDI mass spectrometry. Biochemistry. 2000; 39: 10812–10822.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Domotor E, Bartha K, Machovich R, Adam-Vizi V. Protease-activated receptor-2 (PAR-2) in brain microvascular endothelium and its regulation by plasmin and elastase. J Neurochem. 2002; 80: 746–754.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Sergeev I, Bashkov GV, Lazar AV, Machkov VV. Plasmin as an earlier unknown inducer of endothelium-dependent vasodilation. Dokl Akad Nauk. 1996; 349: 707–709.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Kuroiwa M, Aoki H, Kobayashi S, Nishimura J, Kanaide H. Mechanism of endothelium-dependent relaxation induced by substance P in the coronary artery of the pig. Br J Pharmacol. 1995; 116: 2040–2047.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Jaffe EA, Hoyer LW, Nachman RL. Synthesis of antihemophilic factor antigen by cultured human endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1973; 52: 2757–2764.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Hirano M, Hirano K, Nishimura J, Kanaide H. Transcriptional up-regulation of p27Kip1 during contact-induced growth arrest in vascular endothelial cells. Exp Cell Res. 2001; 271: 356–367.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Momota F, Hirano K, Hirano M, Nishimura J, Kanaide H. Involvement of Gi/o in the PAR-4-induced NO production in endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006; 342: 365–371.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Puglianiello A, Germani D, Rossi P, Cianfarani S. IGF-I stimulates chemotaxis of human neuroblasts. Involvement of type 1 IGF receptor, IGF binding proteins, phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase pathway and plasmin system. J Endocrinol. 2000; 165: 123–131.[Abstract]
  24. Shoelson SE, White MF, Kahn CR. Tryptic activation of the insulin receptor. Proteolytic truncation of the {alpha}-subunit releases the ß-subunit from inhibitory control. J Biol Chem. 1988; 263: 4852–4860.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Kobayashi T, Matsumoto T, Kamata K. The PI3-K/Akt pathway: roles related to alterations in vasomotor responses in diabetic models. J Smooth Muscle Res. 2005; 41: 283–302.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Aman M, Hirano K, Nishimura J, Nakano H, Kanaide H. Enhancement of trypsin-induced contraction by in vivo treatment with 17ß-estradiol and progesterone in rat myometrium. Br J Pharmacol. 2005; 146: 425–434.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Hamilton JR, Nguyen PB, Cocks TM. Atypical protease-activated receptor mediates endothelium-dependent relaxation of human coronary arteries. Circ Res. 1998; 82: 1306–1311.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Hamilton JR, Cocks TM. Heterogeneous mechanisms of endothelium-dependent relaxation for thrombin and peptide activators of protease-activated receptor-1 in porcine isolated coronary artery. Br J Pharmacol. 2000; 130: 181–188.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Laniyonu AA, Hollenberg MD. Vascular actions of thrombin receptor-derived polypeptides: structure-activity profiles for contractile and relaxant effects in rat aorta. Br J Pharmacol. 1995; 114: 1680–1686.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Laura R, Robison DJ, Bing DH. (p-Amidinophenyl)methanesulfonyl fluoride, an irreversible inhibitor of serine proteases. Biochemistry. 1980; 19: 4859–4864.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Akao M, Hasebe Y, Okumura N, Hagiwara H, Seki T, Ariga T. Plasminogen activator-plasmin system potentiates the proliferation of hepatocytes in primary culture. Thromb Res. 2002; 107: 169–174.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Shintani Y, Hirano K, Nakayama T, Nishimura J, Nakano H, Kanaide H. Mechanism of trypsin-induced contraction in the rat myometrium: the possible involvement of a novel member of protease-activated receptor. Br J Pharmacol. 2001; 133: 1276–1285.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Renckens R, Weijer S, de Vos AF, Pater JM, Meijers JC, Hack CE, Levi M, van der Poll T. Inhibition of plasmin activity by tranexamic acid does not influence inflammatory pathways during human endotoxemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24: 483–488.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Gudmundsdottir IJ, Megson IL, Kell JS, Ludlam CA, Fox KA, Webb DJ, Newby DE. Direct vascular effects of protease-activated receptor type 1 agonism in vivo in humans. Circulation. 2006; 114: 1625–1632.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Robin J, Kharbanda R, McLean P, Campbell R, Vallance P. Protease-activated receptor 2-mediated vasodilatation in humans in vivo: role of nitric oxide and prostanoids. Circulation. 2003; 107: 954–959.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Hirano K. The roles of proteinase-activated receptors in the vascular physiology and pathophysiology. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007; 27: 27–36.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/4/949    most recent
01.ATV.0000259360.33203.00v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fujiyoshi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kanaide, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fujiyoshi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kanaide, H.