Editorials |
From the Divisions of Nephrology and Hypertension (L.O.L.) and Cardiovascular Diseases (L.O.L., A.L.) Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn.
Correspondence to Amir Lerman, MD, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases Mayo Clinic Rochester 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905. E-mail lerman.amir{at}mayo.edu
Free radicals and other oxygen- or nitrogen-derived reactive species formed during cellular metabolism and respiration, like superoxide (O2·), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and nitric oxide (NO), are important second messengers and fundamental mediators in biological processes, redox signaling, and cellular growth. However, over the past 2 decades it has become clear that reactive oxygen species (ROS) in particular are also important participants in a number of pathological processes, including cardiovascular and kidney diseases. In fact, increased production of ROS has been proposed as a common pathomechanism by which cardiovascular risk factors affect the vessel wall to induce and amplify vessel and organ injury.
See page 943
Several possible enzymatic sources of ROS have been identified in blood vessels and other tissues, such as nicotineamide adenine dinucleotide (phosphate) oxidase (NAD(P)H oxidase), xanthine oxidase (XO), and uncoupled nitric oxide synthase. NAD(P)H oxidase has long been considered one of the most important sources of ROS in the vessel wall. One of its most potent stimulants is angiotensin II. In turn, NAD(P)H oxidase mediates several downstream effects of angiotensin II like inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, collagen deposition, and vascular hypertrophy.
Nevertheless, an important role in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease has also been ascribed to XO. This ROS-producing enzyme is generated by the posttranslational modification of xanthine dehydrogenase, catalyzes the oxidation of purines to uric acid, and in the process reduces molecular oxygen and generates the free radical superoxide (Figure). In this issue of Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, Landmesser et al contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms regulating XO by showing that angiotensin II upregulates its expression and stimulates production of superoxide from XO in cultured bovine and human aortic endothelial cells.
|
Previous studies have reported that angiotensin receptor antagonist decreased plasma XO activity in hypercholesterolemia.1 However, activation of XO by angiotensin II appears to be cell type-specific, because it was not observed in human vascular endothelial cells in vitro,2 and may be related to differential tissue distribution of these enzymes. In cardiac fibroblasts, the membrane-associated NAD(P)H oxidase is the predominant source of ROS generation by angiotensin II,3 and in patients with coronary artery disease it contributes around 60% while XO contributes around 25% of superoxide anion production.4
Another important finding in the study by Landmesser et al is that NAD(P)H oxidase activates XO, an interaction previously suggested to involve hydrogen peroxide.5 The ability of angiotensin II to activate both enzymes, and of NAD(P)H oxidase to subsequently further activate XO, underscores the important role of angiotensin II in cardiovascular pathophysiology. The importance of this interaction is that it could represent a feed forward mechanism of self-propagation of oxidative stress, by which vascular damage would be amplified during exposure to risk factors. Alas, this process may be partly self-limiting by negative feedback regulation of ROS, which decrease AT1 receptor mRNA expression through intracellular release of calcium and inactivation of p38 MAP kinase.6
The relevance of these pathways to human disease is underscored by the elevated expression of both NAD(P)H oxidase and XO observed in humans with coronary artery disease.4,7 It is not unlikely that NAD(P)H oxidase and XO mediate different effects of angiotensin II.3 XO appears to show greater increases during prolonged ischemia, ischemia/reperfusion,8 and hypercholesterolemia,9,10 and has been implicated in endothelial function in patients with congestive heart failure.11 The increase in NAD(P)H oxidase expression, conversely, is observed during a large variety of pathological conditions, and more frequently stimulated in hypertension.12 Therefore, a number of studies have shown that inhibition of XO using oxypurinol or allopurinol can improve endothelial function in both animal models13 and in humans.14 It remains to be determined whether XO can reciprocally activate NAD(P)H oxidase or other ROS-producing systems, and whether uric acid plays a direct role in the pathomechanism mediated by XO.
Importantly, Landmesser et al translated their in vitro observations to a clinical study. They demonstrated that in patients with coronary artery disease acute inhibition of the endogenous XO activity significantly improved peripheral endothelial function, an effect that was markedly attenuated after 4 weeks of chronic AT1 receptor blockade. Although allopurinol and losartan similarly reduced XO activity, losartan led to greater improvement of endothelial function. These results may have several implications. Firstly, they further support the interaction between angiotensin II and the XO pathway established in vitro. Secondly, endothelial dysfunction is an independent marker for cardiovascular events,15 and several therapeutic interventions, such as statins and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, improve endothelial function beyond their intended primary effect. These observations suggest a common pathway shared by cardiovascular risk factors and that contributes to endothelial dysfunction. The current study further supports this notion and provides insight on the role of angiotensin II and the endogenous XO in early atherosclerosis. The amplification of oxidative stress downstream to angiotensin II may account for the beneficial effect of angiotensin receptor blockers or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in resolving oxidative stress and addressing many important diseases. Indeed, the improvement in endothelial function by allopurinol and losartan may provide novel therapeutic options for the treatment of endothelial dysfunction.
A role for serum uric acid as a marker for cardiovascular events also continues to emerge. In the current study the investigators did not report serum uric acid levels. However, recent studies have demonstrated that the beneficial effect of XO inhibition on endothelial function may be independent of the effect on uric acid levels.11
In summary, the current study enhances our understanding of the seminal role of angiotensin II in promoting endogenous oxidative stress and its functional consequence, endothelial dysfunction. Future studies should establish the role of these therapeutic modalities in patients with coronary artery disease.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
None.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2007 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |