Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2007;27:448-449
doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000257573.32695.e1
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Larsson, E.
Right arrow Articles by Akyürek, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Larsson, E.
Right arrow Articles by Akyürek, L. M.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2007;27:448.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorials

RhoA-Dependent Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell–Specific Transcription

Adding Diaphanous Formins to the Puzzle

Erik Larsson; Xianghua Zhou; Levent M. Akyürek

From the Sahlgrenska Center for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, The Wallenberg Laboratory and Institute of Biomedicine, Department of Medical Chemistry and Cell Biology, Göteborg University, Sweden.

Correspondence to Dr Levent M. Akyürek, The Wallenberg Laboratory, Göteborg University, Bruna Stråket 16, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden. E-mail levent.akyurek{at}wlab.gu.se

Phenotypic modulation of vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs) plays an integral role in both vascular development and vasculoproliferative disorders. SMC-specific marker genes include caldesmon, smooth muscle myosin heavy chain, {alpha}-smooth muscle actin, calponin, SM22{alpha}, and {alpha}- and ß-tropomyosins. Studies aimed at understanding the role of coactivators and corepressors of phenotypic modulation of SMC have been stimulated by the cloning and characterization of these SMC-specific genes and the discovery that the widely expressed serum response factor (SRF) is central to the expression of SMC-specific genes. SRF directly regulates the coordinated expression of several contractile and cytoskeletal genes through one or more CArG-box elements in the regulatory sequences of SMC-specific genes. This CArG-dependent program of SMC differentiation is modulated during both vascular development and arterial remodeling.1 Myocardin and myocardin-related transcription factors (MRTFs) bind to SRF, potently stimulate SRF-dependent transcription, and are necessary and sufficient for SMC differentiation.2 The RhoA pathway appears to activate myocardins by altering their binding to G-actins and causing translocation of myocardins from the cytoplasm to the nucleus.3 The regulation of the myocardins is key to understanding how SRF target genes are activated during SMC differentiation or growth factor-induced proliferation.

See page 478

The role of RhoA effectors in SMC-specific transcription and actin polymerization has not been extensively explored. In this issue of Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, Staus et al studied two RhoA effectors, diaphanous formins 1 and 2 (Dia1 and Dia2), which activate SMC-specific transcription regulated by the myocardin family of SRF cofactors.4 These effectors belong to the subfamily of diaphanous-related formins.5 Formins are modular proteins that contain a series of domains and functional motifs and are potent regulators of actin dynamics.5 Most eukaryotes have multiple formin isoforms, suggesting diverse cellular roles. Although the precise mechanisms by which these formins stimulate actin polymerization are not well understood, Dia1/2 appear to promote polymerization from actin barbed ends in cooperation with an actin-binding protein, profilin.6,7 Staus et al demonstrated that Dia1/2 are expressed in many SMC-rich tissues. They proved that Dia1/2 signaling activated by RhoA induces SMC-specific promoter activity, requires the presence of SRF, and increases nuclear translocation of the myocardin-related transcription factors (Figure). To further support this model, the authors expressed a dominant-negative Dia1 variant that inhibits both Dia1 and Dia2 and demonstrated a decreased SMC-specific transcription in primary SMCs.


Figure 1
View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
RhoA-dependent vascular smooth muscle–specific transcription. Many microenvironmental cues, including growth factors, cell–cell contacts, and extracellular matrix, induce activation of RhoA. ROK, PKN, and Dia1/2 are the RhoA effector molecules that are operating in SMCs to regulate cytoskeletal reorganization and nuclear translocation of MRTF-A/B. These transcriptional factors then facilitate the binding of SRF to one or more CArG sequences in the promoter of many SMC-specific genes. CArG indicates CC(AT)6GG sequences; Dia, diaphanous formin; MRTF, myocardin-related transcriptional factor; PKN, protein kinase N; ROK, RhoA-binding kinase; SRF, serum-response factor.

These intriguing observations raise several questions that remain to be further studied. Molecular mechanisms that dissect the specific interaction not only between Dia1/2 and RhoA but also with RhoB and RhoC need to be identified. In fact, Dia1 is also recruited to endosomes by activated RhoB.8 A comparison of Dia1/2 activity with other RhoA effectors including ROK9 and PKN10 is also necessary to identify the dominating or overlapping signaling pathways that regulate SMC-specific transcription. These different RhoA effectors may positively or negatively operate with each other in a cell-specific manner.11 In addition to SMC-containing tissues, Staus et al demonstrated Dia1/2 expression in skeletal muscle,4 raising the possibility that these effectors may also be involved in differentiation of other muscle tissues. The development of a Dia1/2-deficient mouse line will be very useful to determine the biological importance of Dia1 or Dia2 for vascular development. The role of Dia1/2 in SMC-specific gene expression may be important not only for the vascular development, but also for the progression of atherosclerotic plaques. In this context, extracellular cues regulating Dia1/2 should be mapped.

The model that has further evolved here is that regulation of SMC differentiation is extremely complex. Given the fact that the contribution of circulating progenitor SMCs to vasculoproliferative human disorders is still controversial, it is important to investigate the phenotypic modulation of preexisting SMCs in response to microenvironmental cues and the genetic program that controls the coordinate SMC-specific expression. Future studies should focus on identifying and characterizing new pieces in the signaling pathways of SMC-specific transcription and their significance to both vascular development and vasculoproliferative disorders.


*    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Rosie Perkins for editorial assistance.

Sources of Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Swedish Heart Lung Foundation (to L.M.A.).

Disclosures

None.


*    References
up arrowTop
*References
 
1. Owens GK, Kumar MS, Wamhoff BR. Molecular regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation in development and disease. Physiol Rev. 2004; 84: 767–801.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Wang DZ, Olson EN. Control of smooth muscle development by the myocardin family of transcriptional coactivators. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2004; 14: 558–566.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Mack CP, Somlyo AV, Hautmann M, Somlyo AP, Owens GK. Smooth muscle differentiation marker gene expression is regulated by RhoA-mediated actin polymerization. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 341–347.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Staus DP, Blaker AL, Taylor JM, Mack CP. Diaphanous 1 and 2 regulate smooth muscle cell differentiation by activating the myocardin-related transcription factors. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007; 27: 478–486.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Wallar BJ, Alberts AS. The formins: active scaffolds that remodel the cytoskeleton. Trends Cell Biol. 2003; 13: 435–446.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Higashida C, Miyoshi T, Fujita A, Oceguera-Yanez F, Monypenny J, Andou Y, Narumiya S, Watanabe N. Actin polymerization-driven molecular movement of mDia1 in living cells. Science. 2004; 303: 2007–2010.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Shimada A, Nyitrai M, Vetter IR, Kuhlmann D, Bugyi B, Narumiya S, Geeves MA, Wittinghofer A. The core FH2 domain of diaphanous-related formins is an elongated actin binding protein that inhibits polymerization. Mol Cell. 2004; 13: 511–522.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Fernandez-Borja M, Janssen L, Verwoerd D, Hordijk P, Neefjes J. RhoB regulates endosome transport by promoting actin assembly on endosomal membranes through Dia1. J Cell Sci. 2005; 118: 2661–2670.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Chapados R, Abe K, Ihida-Stansbury K, McKean D, Gates AT, Kern M, Merklinger S, Elliott J, Plant A, Shimokawa H, Jones PL. ROCK controls matrix synthesis in vascular smooth muscle cells: coupling vasoconstriction to vascular remodeling. Circ Res. 2006; 99: 837–844.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Deaton RA, Su C, Valencia TG, Grant SR. Transforming growth factor-beta1-induced expression of smooth muscle marker genes involves activation of PKN and p38 MAPK. J Biol Chem. 2005; 280: 31172–31181.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Sahai E, Marshall CJ. ROCK and Dia have opposing effects on adherens junctions downstream of Rho. Nat Cell Biol. 2002; 4: 408–415.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Related Article:

Diaphanous 1 and 2 Regulate Smooth Muscle Cell Differentiation by Activating the Myocardin-Related Transcription Factors
Dean P. Staus, Alicia L. Blaker, Joan M. Taylor, and Christopher P. Mack
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2007 27: 478-486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. Chen and B. L. Firestein
RhoA Regulates Dendrite Branching in Hippocampal Neurons by Decreasing Cypin Protein Levels
J. Neurosci., August 1, 2007; 27(31): 8378 - 8386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Larsson, E.
Right arrow Articles by Akyürek, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Larsson, E.
Right arrow Articles by Akyürek, L. M.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article