Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2007;27:2756-2762
Published online before print October 4, 2007, doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.146860
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/12/2756    most recent
ATVBAHA.107.146860v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Széplaki, G.
Right arrow Articles by Entz, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Széplaki, G.
Right arrow Articles by Entz, L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Substance via MeSH
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2007;27:2756.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Atherosclerosis and Lipoproteins

Low C1-Inhibitor Levels Predict Early Restenosis After Eversion Carotid Endarterectomy

Gábor Széplaki; Lilian Varga; Judit Laki; Edit Dósa; Szabolcs Rugonfalvi-Kiss; Hans O. Madsen; Zoltán Prohászka; Andrea Kocsis; Péter Gál; Attila Szabó; György Acsády; István Karádi; László Selmeci; Peter Garred; George Füst; László Entz

From the 3rd Department of Internal Medicine (G.S., L.V., J.L., S.R.-K., Z.P., I.K., G.F.) and the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery (E.D., A.S., G.A., L.S., L.E.), Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Tissue-Typing Laboratory-7631 (H.O.M., P. Garred), Department of Clinical Immunology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; the Research Group of Inflammation Biology and Immunogenomics (Z.P., I.K., G.F.), Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary; and the Institute of Enzymology (A.K., P. Gal), Biological Research Center, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.

Correspondence to Prof George Füst, MD, DSc, 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Kútvölgyi út 4, H-1125, Hungary. E-mail fustge{at}kut.sote.hu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Objective— Homozygotes for the normal (A) allele of mannose-binding lectin (MBL2) gene have higher risks to develop an early restenosis after eversion carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Activation of the lectin pathway is regulated by C1-inhibitor (C1-INH). The objective of the present study was to determine the predictive value of C1-INH in restenosis after CEA.

Methods and Results— C1-INH and MBL-associated serine protease-2 (MASP-2) were determined in samples serially taken from 64 patients with CEA, who were followed-up with carotid duplex scan (CDS) examinations for 14 months. MBL2 genotypes were also determined. Patients with >50% restenosis had lower C1-INH levels at 6 weeks (P=0.0052) and at 4 days (P=0.0277) postsurgery. C1-INH levels at 6 weeks correlated inversely with the CDS values at 14 months (r=–0.3415, P=0.0058), but only in MBL2 A/A homozygotes (r=–0.5044, P=0.0015). Patients with low C1-INH levels (C1-INH <115%) had higher CDS values already at 7 months postsurgery. Patients with MBL2 A/A and low C1-INH levels at 6 weeks postsurgery had 13.97 (95% CI:1.95 to 100.21, P=0.0087) times higher risk to develop an early restenosis. Differences in the MASP-2 concentration were not associated with restenosis.

Conclusions— Determining C1-INH levels at 6 weeks postsurgery—together with genotyping of MBL2—might be a useful marker in the identification of patients with high risk for early carotid restenosis.

Concentrations of C1-inhibitor were determined in samples serially taken from patients who were followed-up after carotid endarterectomy. Low C1-INH levels at 6-weeks postsurgery predicted the development of an early restenosis, indicating that it might be a marker in the identification of patients with high risk for early restenosis.


Key Words: carotid arteries • genetics • inflammation • restenosis • risk factors


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a routine surgical intervention to prevent stroke in patients with severe symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis.1,2 The long-term outcome of CEA is highly affected by the development of recurrent carotid stenosis: either as a consequence of myointimal hyperplasia3 (early restenosis, which develops within 24 months after CEA) or of the renewal of atherosclerosis3 (late restenosis). The incidence of an early restenosis after CEA is approximately 13%4 in the first 2 years. It seems that traditional risk factors of atherosclerosis are unable to predict early restenosis,5,6 although studies are controversial.7,8 This might reflect that the pathomechanism of an early restenosis—which is a consequence of an inflammatory response to the vessel wall leading to myointimal hyperplasia of smooth muscle cells3—differs from those of primary atherosclerosis.

It seems that the complement system plays an important role in the inflammatory response in early restenosis after eversion CEA. Recently in a prospective study, we demonstrated that homozygous carriers of the wild-type (A) alleles of the mannose-binding lectin (MBL) gene (MBL2) have significantly higher risk to develop early restenosis after eversion CEA compared with carriers of the defect (B, C, or D) alleles of MBL2.9 Moreover, we have also demonstrated that elevated levels of complement C3 (C3), but not other noncomplement acute-phase reactants (APRs)—such as C-reactive protein (CRP)—are associated with and might directly contribute to the development of early restenosis, depending on MBL2 genotype.10 Thus the lectin pathway has a dual role in carotid artery disease: on the one hand an intact lectin pathway seems to be protective against primary atherosclerosis,11 whereas it plays a key role in the development of early restenosis after CEA.9,10

Activation of the lectin pathway occurs when MBL (or ficolins) bind their ligands, through MBL associated serine proteases (MASPs, mainly through MASP-212), which leads to activation of the terminal complement cascade by C4 and C2.13 C1-inhibitor (C1-INH) is the main inhibitor of lectin pathway activation, but also inhibits classical pathway of complement and the coagulation, fibrinolysis, and kinin-kallikrein systems also.14 Only scarce literature data are available on the association of C1-INH with atherosclerotic vascular diseases.15 The objective of the present study was to determine whether an association of C1-INH levels with early restenosis after eversion type CEA exists, based on our previous findings with MBL29 and C3.10 In a prospective study, serum C1-INH concentrations were determined in samples serially taken from patients who underwent eversion type CEA and compared with the incidence and degree of restenosis assessed by carotid duplex scan (CDS) examinations during the follow-up. In addition, the influence of different MBL2 genotypes on the association of C1-INH and MASP-2 to early restenosis was also considered.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patients
In this prospective study, we included 64 Hungarian patients (21 female and 43 male, aged between 43 and 79 years), with a median stenosis of 83.8% (78.8 to 90.0, 25th to 75th percentile) of the affected internal carotid arteries, who underwent eversion type CEA at the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest between October 2000 and March 2003. All patients were followed-up for at least 1 year (median 13.8, (12.3 to 19.0) months). All patients gave informed consent and the study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Semmelweis University, Budapest and conformed to the principles outlined in the declaration of Helsinki.

Study Design
Patients included in the present study represent a subgroup of a prospective study of 123 consecutive patients, in which MBL2 genotypes,9 changes in CRP16 and C310 levels were previously published. The reason for including less patients in the present study was the limited availability of the serum samples, otherwise the study setup was the same.9,10,16

Briefly, all patients underwent eversion type CEA: the surgical technique has been described earlier.17 The indication for CEA was in accordance with the American Heart Association guidelines.18

Blood samples were collected at 4 different time intervals; preoperatively and 4 days, 6 weeks, and 14 months postsurgery. Serum was immediately separated and stored at –80°C until laboratory use, whereas EDTA-anticoagulated blood samples were obtained for DNA preparation preoperatively.

CDS examinations (ATL Ultramark 9 HDI system) were performed preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 7 months, and 14 months postsurgery by an experienced radiologist. The common, internal, and external carotid arteries on both sides were examined in the standard fashion, spectral measurements were taken with a Doppler angle between 55° and 60°. The diagnostic criteria for internal carotid artery stenosis and restenosis were based on peak systolic velocities and end diastolic velocities as well as internal carotid artery/common carotid artery ratios. Patients had medical check-up and CDS examinations at 6 weeks (median 5.7 [4.6 to 8.0]), 7 months (median 6.8, [6.2 to 7.9]) and at 14 months (median 13.8 [12.3 to 19.0]) postsurgery. Early restenosis was defined as >50% stenosis of the operated internal carotid artery at 14 months postsurgery (which reflects the pathomechanism). Early restenosis developed in 10/64 (15.63%) patients during the follow-up, which is comparable to data published in the literature,4 in 3/64 (4.7%) cases clinically significant (>70%) restenosis developed (that indicated a second surgery/intervention). Baseline characteristics of the patients who developed or did not develop early restenosis are shown in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of the Patients With or Without Restenosis During the Follow-Up

Laboratory Analysis
Serum concentrations of C1-INH were measured by radial immunodiffusion method,19 using goat antisera against human C1-inhibitor (Quidel) for detection. C1-INH concentrations are expressed as percentages of the standard calibrator, which was pooled human serum of healthy blood donors. Total genomic DNA was extracted from white blood cells using the method of Miller.20 Determination of the alleles of the MBL2 gene were performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using sequence specific priming (PCR-SSP), as described previously.21 MASP-2 levels were measured by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method as described in supplemental Table I (available online at http://atvb.ahajournals.org).

Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS for Windows 13.0.1 (SPSS Inc) and Prism for Windows 4.02 (GraphPad Software) statistical software products. As many of the variables had non-Gaussian distributions we used nonparametric tests throughout the analysis. We used the Mann–Whitney U test to compare 2 independent groups, the Fisher exact test to compare categorical variables, the Friedman test for variance analysis (using Dunn’s post hoc test comparisons between 2 repeated measures), Spearman rho to calculate correlations, and 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni posttests to detect interactions. Multiple logistic regression and receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analyses were also performed. All statistical analyses were performed 2-tailed and P<0.05 was considered as significant. Values presented in the text are medians (interquartile ranges), unless otherwise stated.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Changes in C1-INH Levels During the Follow-Up
Concentrations of C1-INH were determined in the patients at 4 different time intervals; preoperatively, as well as 4 days, 6 weeks, and 14 months postsurgery (Figure 1A). C1-INH levels significantly increased at 4 days postsurgery compared with the preoperative values (156.0 [131.0 to 172.5]% versus 115.0 [95.5 to 131.0]%, P<0.01 Dunn’s post hoc test after Friedman’s test). During the follow-up, we observed a sharp decrease in C1-INH levels at 6 weeks compared with the 4 days postsurgery values (P<0.01) and C1-INH levels remained lower at 14 months as compared with the 4 days postsurgery levels (P<0.01).


Figure 1
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Changes in C1-INH and MASP-2 levels during the follow-up. Elevation in C1-INH levels followed CEA at 4 days postsurgery. From day 4 to week 6 C1-INH and MASP-2 levels decreased sharply. Medians and interquartile ranges are presented. Dunn’s post hoc test after repeated measures ANOVA (Friedman test): *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.

Next, patients were divided into 2 subgroups according to the MBL2 carrier state. Thirty-seven patients were homozygous for the MBL2 normal (A) allele (MBL A/A), whereas 27 patients carried at least 1 variant (B, C, or D) MBL2 allele (MBL A/O or O/O). We found no association between MBL2 genotypes and in changes in C1-INH levels during the follow-up (data not shown).

Changes in MASP-2 Concentrations According to Different MBL2 Genotypes During the Follow-Up
Concentrations of MASP-2 were also determined in the samples. The increase in MASP-2 levels at 4 days postsurgery compared with the baseline values did not reach statistical significance, however an increasing trend could be observed. Considering all patients, MASP-2 levels were lower at 6 weeks (P<0.01) and at 14 months (P<0.01) compared with the 4 days postsurgery results, respectively (Figure 1B). However, the decrease in MASP-2 levels at 6 weeks compared with 4 days postsurgery was only significant (P<0.01) in patients with the MBL A/A genotype, where MASP-2 even decreased below baseline values (P<0.01). In patients with MBL A/O or O/O MASP-2 levels were not decreased at 6 weeks compared with 4 days postsurgery levels.

Association of C1-INH and MASP-2 Levels to Early Restenosis
Concentrations of C1-INH and MASP-2 were compared in patients who developed (n=10) and who did not develop (n=54) early restenosis at 14 months postsurgery. Patients with early restenosis had lower C1-INH levels in blood samples taken at 6 weeks (P=0.0052) and also at 4 days (P=0.0277), compared with the patients who did not develop restenosis (Table 2). Similarly, baseline C1-INH levels tended to be lower in patients who developed restenosis (P=0.0565). In contrast, we found no association between C1-INH concentrations at 14 months postsurgery and restenosis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Association of C1-INH and MASP-2 Levels to Early Restenosis at Different Time Intervals

Considering MASP-2 concentrations, no significant associations with early restenosis were detected (Table 2).

Correlation of C1-INH Concentrations With the Degree of Restenosis
Next, a ROC analysis was performed to determine which blood sampling time of C1-INH (pre-operative, 4 days, or 6 weeks postsurgery) has the best specificity and sensitivity value in the prediction of early restenosis. The area under the curve for the ROC analysis was the highest at 6 weeks (0.7796), followed by the 4 days postsurgery (0.7204) and the preoperative (0.6907) C1-INH measurements. Thus C1-INH levels determined at 6 weeks postsurgery was included in the further analysis.

We found a strong significant inverse correlation between C1-INH concentrations at 6 weeks and the degree of restenosis at 14 months (r=–0.3415, P=0.0058). Correlations were also determined in the patients, grouped by MBL2 genotypes. The strong inverse correlation between serum C1-INH levels at 6 weeks and the degree of restenosis at 14 months postsurgery was only present in patients with MBL A/A (r=–0.5044, P=0.0015), but not in patients with MBL A/O or O/O genotypes (r=–0.1418, P=0.4805).

Predictive Value of Low C1-INH Levels at 6 Weeks in the Development of an Early Restenosis
To assess the predictive value of C1-INH levels on the development of restenosis during the follow-up, patients were categorized according to low versus normal/high C1-INH concentrations measured at 6 weeks postsurgery. Low C1-INH levels were defined according to a ROC analysis with the best specificity (0.741) and sensitivity (0.700) values and were set as C1-INH <115.0%, which equaled to the lowest tertile of the whole group. As presented on Figure 2 CDS values progressively increased in the group of low C1-INH patients whereas those with high C1-INH were characterized with a less pronounced increase. Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni posttests were performed. Patients with low C1-INH levels had significantly higher CDS values at 7 months (P<0.01) and later at 14 months (P<0.05) postsurgery. Low C1-INH levels are associated with high CDS values during the follow-up period at high statistical significance (P<0.0001 for 2-way ANOVA).


Figure 2
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Dynamic changes of CDS values during the follow-up period in groups of patients stratified according to 6 week C1-INH levels. Patients with low C1-INH showed sharp increase and had higher CDS values during the follow-up. Means and 95% confidence intervals are presented, 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni posttests: *P<0.05, **P<0.01.

Next, multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate the odds ratio of low C1-INH levels at 6 weeks postsurgery for the prediction of an early restenosis (CDS >50% at 14 months postsurgery; Table 3). In the model we adjusted for age and sex, as no traditional risk factors or CRP concentrations determined at 6 weeks showed association with restenosis (data not shown). In all patients we found that those patients with low C1-INH levels at 6 weeks postsurgery have 6.93 (95% CI:1.55 to 31.02, P=0.0113) times higher risk to develop an early restenosis in 14 months, compared with the patients with C1-INH levels in the 2 higher tertiles, independent of age and sex (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Predictive Value of Low C1-INH Levels at 6 Weeks for the Development of an Early Restenosis Adjusted for Age and Sex

The predictive value of low C1-INH levels was significant and much more pronounced in patients with the MBL2 A/A genotype (Table 3), the odds ratio for the development of an early restenosis was 13.97 (95% CI:1.95 to 100.21, P=0.0087) in patients with low C1-INH levels. On the contrary, in patients with MBL A/O or O/O, low C1-INH levels did not have significant predictive value (P=0.3791).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The main novel finding of the present report is that low C1-INH levels, determined at 6 weeks postsurgery, are able to predict early restenosis after eversion CEA, depending on MBL2 genotypes. Patients with C1-INH levels at the lowest tertile had almost 7-fold higher risk to develop early restenosis compared with patients with C1-INH levels in the 2 higher tertiles, adjusted for age and sex. The risk is even higher in subjects with the MBL2 A/A genotype: patients with low C1-INH concentrations have nearly 14-times higher risk for early restenosis. Patients with low C1-INH levels had significantly higher CDS values already at 7 months postsurgery compared with the patients with normal/high C1-INH. MASP-2 levels did not have significant predictive value in early restenosis and showed no associations with CDS values during the follow-up. We found that C1-INH levels are increased at 4 days postsurgery compared with the preoperative values. As C1-INH is a well known positive APR,22 this observation might confirm our previous finding, that a strong acute-phase reaction follows CEA at 4 days postsurgery, which can be detected by sensitive inflammatory markers, such as CRP.10 At 6 weeks postsurgery—with the abatement of the acute-phase reaction—levels of C1-INH returned to baseline. During the 14 months of follow-up, however, we observed an increasing trend of C1-INH levels in patients who developed restenosis—similar to our previous observation with C3.10 Thus it seems that the regulation of complement proteins differs from noncomplement APRs, and there might be an upregulation in patients who develop restenosis after CEA.

C1-INH is not only a potent inhibitor of the lectin pathway, but also inhibits classical pathway of complement and proteases of 3 other plasma enzyme cascades (coagulation, fibrinolysis, and kinin-kallikrein).14 It is a serine-protease inhibitor, which forms inactive complexes with its target proteinases (C1r, C1s, coagulation factors XIa, and XIIa, and plasma kallikrein). The primary sources of C1-INH synthesis are hepatocytes, however secondary extrahepatic sites of production has also been described (monocytes, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, megakaryocytes, microglial cells, neurons, placenta).23 Several patients who developed significant early restenosis at the end of the follow-up, had slightly lower serum C1-INH levels already prior CEA (at the margin of statistical significance). During the follow-up this observation has become significant and low levels of C1-INH were able to predict restenosis in the patient group. Thus we assume that initially low C1-INH levels are not able to regulate complement activation sufficiently in patients. This assumption is confirmed by the observation that low C1-INH has significant predictive value only in patients with the MBL2 A/A genotype. Thus we conclude—as we reported earlier9—that an intact lectin pathway might be required for restenosis, and insufficient regulation by low C1-INH levels contributes to the uncontrolled complement activation (Figure 3 shows the pathophysiology). However, we cannot rule out the possibility that dysregulation of the other plasma enzyme systems—because of the decreased C1-INH levels—also contributes to the process.


Figure 3
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. The role of C1-INH and MBL2 in the pathophysiology of restenosis. In patients with an intact lectin pathway MBL might bind to neointimal intermedier filaments or endothelial cells and activate complement (C'), which is insufficiently inhibited by low C1-INH levels. This might lead to hyperplasia of smooth muscle cells (SMCs) and restenosis.

Complement activation plays pathophysiologic roles during ischemia/reperfusion injury24 and the involvement of the lectin pathway is also suggested.25,26 During eversion CEA tissue hypoxia occurs for the time of cross-clamping (approx. 20 minutes) of the carotid artery, which may result in complement activation. During surgery, the atherosclerotic plaque is removed together with the intima, exposing a new surface in the vessel wall, which is mainly composed by smooth muscle cells, inflammatory cells, and extracellular matrix proteins. We assume that the initiation of the lectin pathway occurs by binding of MBL to the endothelial cells or intermedier filaments,27 and it is not sufficiently controlled by low C1-INH levels attributable to low hepatic synthesis or lack of local production of neointimal cells. This leads to activation and proliferation of smooth muscle cells28 and macrophages, which might lead to the increased production of cytokines and growth factors,29 which finally leads to myointimal hyperplasia. Prior studies conducted on patients with acute myocardial infarction have shown that treatment with intravenous C1-INH may reduce myocardial injury.30,31 Based on our findings it can be assumed that supplementation with C1-INH during the postoperative period might be beneficial in the prevention of restenosis in patients with CEA.

It seems that monitoring complement proteins—especially C3 and C1-INH—has a rationale in the follow-up of CEA. Previously we have shown that high C3 levels are associated with the degree of restenosis determined by CDS after CEA.10 High C3 levels might have a direct role in the hyperproliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells28 and indicate the chronic complement dependent inflammation as a special marker, and not as a common acute phase reactant.10 However C3 was not able to predict early restenosis in these patients. In contrast to the increasing evidence on C3 as a useful risk factor in coronary32–34 or carotid10 artery disease, scarce data are available on the association of C1-INH with vascular diseases. Kostner et al found that patients with unstable angina pectoris tended to have higher C1-INH levels compared with patients with stable angina pectoris.15 In the present study we reported that low C1-INH levels are associated with poorer outcome after eversion CEA. Thus the relation of C1-INH levels with different vascular diseases remains to be further examined.

In conclusion, we have shown that low C1-INH levels are associated with and are able to predict early restenosis after CEA. These results are one step toward understanding restenosis development after eversion CEA, however further studies are required to confirm the role of C1-INH as a marker in the identification of patients with high risk for early recurrent carotid stenosis. Moreover it would be interesting and important to study the role of C1-INH in patients with carotid artery stenting, which are currently under way in our Departments.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Sources of Funding

These studies were supported by the National Research Fund of Hungary (OTKA T-046-444, OTKA T-046-837) and the Ministry of Welfare (ETT 154/2006).

Disclosures

None.


*    Footnotes
 
Original received April 24, 2007; final version accepted September 20, 2007.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325: 445–453.[Abstract]
  2. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA. 1995; 273: 1421–1428.[Abstract]
  3. Trisal V, Paulson T, Hans SS, Mittal V. Carotid artery restenosis: an ongoing disease process. Am Surg. 68: 275–279, 2002;discussion 279–280.
  4. Frericks H, Kievit J, van Baalen JM, van Bockel JH. Carotid recurrent stenosis and risk of ipsilateral stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Stroke. 1998; 29: 244–250.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Moore WS, Kempczinski RF, Nelson JJ, Toole JF. Recurrent carotid stenosis: results of the asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis study. Stroke. 1998; 29: 2018–2025.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Ganesan R, Cote R, Mackey A. Significance of carotid restenosis following endarterectomy. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1998; 8: 338–344.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Ladowski JS, Shinabery LM, Peterson D, Peterson AC, Deschner WP. Factors contributing to recurrent carotid disease following carotid endarterectomy. Am J Surg. 1997; 174: 118–120.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Reina-Gutierrez T, Serrano-Hernando FJ, Sanchez-Hervas L, Ponce A, Vega de Ceniga M, Martin A. Recurrent carotid artery stenosis following endarterectomy: natural history and risk factors. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005; 29: 334–341.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Rugonfalvi-Kiss S, Dósa E, Madsen HO, Endrész V, Prohászka Z, Laki J, Karádi I, Gönczöl E, Selmeci L, Romics L, Füst G, Entz L, Garred P. High rate of early restenosis after carotid eversion endarterectomy in homozygous carriers of the normal mannose-binding lectin genotype. Stroke. 2005; 36: 944–948.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Széplaki G, Varga L, Laki J, Dósa E, Madsen HO, Prohászka Z, Szabó A, Acsády G, Selmeci L, Garred P, Füst G, Entz L. Elevated complement C3 is associated with early restenosis after eversion carotid endarterectomy. Thromb Haemost. 2006; 96: 529–534.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Madsen HO, Videm V, Svejgaard A, Svennevig JL, Garred P. Association of mannose-binding-lectin deficiency with severe atherosclerosis. Lancet. 1998; 352: 959–960.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Thiel S, Vorup-Jensen T, Stover CM, Schwaeble W, Laursen SB, Poulsen K, Willis AC, Eggleton P, Hansen S, Holmskov U, Reid KB, Jensenius JC. A second serine protease associated with mannan-binding lectin that activates complement. Nature. 1997; 386: 506–510.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Walport MJ. Complement. First of two parts. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 1058–1066.[Free Full Text]
  14. Caliezi C, Wuillemin WA, Zeerleder S, Redondo M, Eisele B, Hack CE. C1-Esterase inhibitor: an anti-inflammatory agent and its potential use in the treatment of diseases other than hereditary angioedema. Pharmacol Rev. 2000; 52: 91–112.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Kostner KM, Fahti RB, Case C, Hobson P, Tate J, Marwick TH. Inflammation, complement activation and endothelial function in stable and unstable coronary artery disease. Clin Chim Acta. 2006; 365: 129–134.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Dósa E, Rugonfalvi-Kiss S, Prohászka Z, Szabó A, Karadi I, Selmeci L, Romics L, Füst G, Acsády G, Entz L. Marked decrease in the levels of two inflammatory markers, hs-C-reactive protein and fibrinogen in patients with severe carotid atherosclerosis after eversion carotid endarterectomy. Inflamm Res. 2004; 53: 631–635.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Entz L, Járányi S, Nemes A. Eversion endarterectomy in surgery of the internal carotid artery. Cardiovasc Surg. 1996; 4: 190–194.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Biller J, Feinberg WM, Castaldo JE, Whittemore AD, Harbaugh RE, Dempsey RJ, Caplan LR, Kresowik TF, Matchar DB, Toole JF, Easton JD, Adams HP Jr, Brass LM, Hobson RW, 2nd, Brott TG, Sternau L. Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy: a statement for healthcare professionals from a Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1998; 97: 501–509.[Free Full Text]
  19. Kohler PF, Muller-Eberhard HJ. Immunochemical quantitation of the third, fourth and fifth components of human complement: concentrations in the serum of healthy adults. J Immunol. 1967; 99: 1211–1216.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988; 16: 1215.[Free Full Text]
  21. Garred P, J JS, Quist L, Taaning E, Madsen HO. Association of mannose-binding lectin polymorphisms with sepsis and fatal outcome, in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome. J Infect Dis. 2003; 188: 1394–1403.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Gabay C, Kushner I. Acute-phase proteins and other systemic responses to inflammation. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340: 448–454.[Free Full Text]
  23. Zahedin R, Davis AE. C1-inhibitor. In: Morley BJ, Walport MJ, eds. The Complement FactsBook. London: Academic Press; 2000.
  24. Yasuda M, Kawarabayashi T, Akioka K, Teragaki M, Oku H, Kanayama Y, Takeuchi K, Takeda T, Kawase Y, Ikuno Y. The complement system in the acute phase of myocardial infarction. Jpn Circ J. 1989; 53: 1017–1022.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Jordan JE, Montalto MC, Stahl GL. Inhibition of mannose-binding lectin reduces postischemic myocardial reperfusion injury. Circulation. 2001; 104: 1413–1418.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Collard CD, Vakeva A, Morrissey MA, Agah A, Rollins SA, Reenstra WR, Buras JA, Meri S, Stahl GL. Complement activation after oxidative stress: role of the lectin complement pathway. Am J Pathol. 2000; 156: 1549–1556.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Collard CD, Montalto MC, Reenstra WR, Buras JA, Stahl GL. Endothelial oxidative stress activates the lectin complement pathway: role of cytokeratin 1. Am J Pathol. 2001; 159: 1045–1054.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Lin ZH, Fukuda N, Jin XQ, Yao EH, Ueno T, Endo M, Saito S, Matsumoto K, Mugishima H. Complement 3 is involved in the synthetic phenotype and exaggerated growth of vascular smooth muscle cells from spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 2004; 44: 42–47.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Szabó A, Laki J, Madsen HO, Dósa E, Prohászka Z, Rugonfalvi-Kiss S, Kókai M, Acsádi G, Karádi I, Entz L, Selmeci L, Romics L, Füst G, Garred P, Cervenak L. Early rise in serum VEGF and PDGF levels predisposes patients with a normal MBL2 genotype to restenosis after eversion endarterectomy. Stroke. 2007; 38: 2247–2253.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. de Zwaan C, Kleine AH, Diris JH, Glatz JF, Wellens HJ, Strengers PF, Tissing M, Hack CE, van Dieijen-Visser MP, Hermens WT. Continuous 48-h C1-inhibitor treatment, following reperfusion therapy, in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2002; 23: 1670–1677.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Thielmann M, Marggraf G, Neuhauser M, Forkel J, Herold U, Kamler M, Massoudy P, Jakob H. Administration of C1-esterase inhibitor during emergency coronary artery bypass surgery in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006; 30: 285–293.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Muscari A, Massarelli G, Bastagli L, Poggiopollini G, Tomassetti V, Volta U, Puddu GM, Puddu P. Relationship between serum C3 levels and traditional risk factors for myocardial infarction. Acta Cardiol. 1998; 53: 345–354.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Ajjan R, Grant PJ, Futers TS, Brown JM, Cymbalista CM, Boothby M, Carter AM. Complement C3 and C-reactive protein levels in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Thromb Haemost. 2005; 94: 1048–1053.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Széplaki G, Prohászka Z, Duba J, Rugonfalvi-Kiss S, Karádi I, Kókai M, Kramer J, Füst G, Kleiber M, Romics L, Varga L. Association of high serum concentration of the third component of complement (C3) with pre-existing severe coronary artery disease and new vascular events in women. Atherosclerosis. 2004; 177: 383–389.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/12/2756    most recent
ATVBAHA.107.146860v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Széplaki, G.
Right arrow Articles by Entz, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Széplaki, G.
Right arrow Articles by Entz, L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Substance via MeSH