Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2007;27:2273-2274
Published online before print August 30, 2007, doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.153114
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/11/2273    most recent
ATVBAHA.107.153114v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schaper, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schaper, W.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2007;27:2273.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial

Prevention of Tissue Death by Killer Cells?

The Role of the Immune System in Arteriogenesis

Wolfgang Schaper

From the Department of Experimental Cardiology, Max-Planck-Institute, Bad Nauheim, Germany.

Correspondence to Wolfgang Schaper, Max-Planck-Institute, Department of Experimental Cardiology, Parkstrasse 1, Bad Nauheim D-61231, Germany. E-mail w.schaper{at}kerckhoff.mpg.de

Based on the observation that mouse strains differing in lymphocyte-mediated immune responses differed also markedly in collateral density, in their ability to develop a collateral circulation, in remodeling and the expression of VEGF-A after femoral artery occlusion, previously reported by Scholz et al,1 Chalothorn,2 and Helisch et al,3 van Weel et al had set out to test the role of lymphocytes in arteriogenesis.4 They found that NK-cells and CD4 cells are important for collateral vessel growth and that substitution in animals deficient for these cells accelerated collateral development. These elegant studies, using mouse genetics as well as antibody-based deletion experiments, provide a solution to a long smoldering discussion about the role of lymphocytes in arteriogenesis as well as in angiogenesis. As early as 1976 Klintworth and collaborators5 showed that angiogenesis in response to corneal injury was associated with an influx of leukocytes. The causal relationship was proven by irradiation to depress the bone marrow leading to impaired angiogenesis. The contribution of subsets of leukocytes was difficult to discern at the time because only morphological markers were available. Lymphocytes were believed to play a lesser role compared with the unfractionated leukocyte population. We could show in 1971 that leukocytes played a role in arteriogenesis because they invaded the wall of developing coronary collaterals,6 and a systematic study published in 19767 identified these cells as monocytes. These findings were later supplemented by increased endothelial expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 and by increased expression of adhesion molecules. The role of the monocyte in angiogenesis was reported by Polverini in 19778 and a few years later by Sunderkotter.9 Selective elimination of monocytes/macrophages by liposomes spiked with phosphonates inhibited arteriogenesis10 and targeted disruption of MCP-1 and its cognate receptor also impaired collateral growth.11 Extreme monocytopenia as in op/op mice markedly inhibited arteriogenesis.12

See page 2310

In the studies by van Weel and colleagues the important role of lymphocytes is very convincingly demonstrated. However, their findings contrast with other previous reports that had come to different conclusions. Hoefer and colleagues13 found completely normal collateral blood flow after femoral occlusion in nude mice, suggesting that lymphocytes do not play a role. This may have been premature because the selection of mouse strains for controls is difficult in view of the wide variation in the arteriogenic potency of different mouse strains. Hoefer et al14 also infused chemokines that attracted either monocytes, leukocytes, or lymphocytes and found that only monocyte attractants stimulated arteriogenesis. These studies were carried out in rabbits and may be difficult to compare with van Weels detailed genetic mouse studies. Studies by Hoefer et al in mouse strains with targeted disruption of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha and its cognate receptors13 seemed also to imply that lymphocytes do not play a role. However, TNFalpha KO mouse strains in our hands were extremely sensitive to variations in the genetic background.

Van Weels studies clearly showed the importance of lymphocytes but not their specific function in the process of arteriogenesis. We hypothesized earlier6 that lymphocytes may play an important role in the remodeling process: when collaterals grow, and this may be up to 20 times their original diameter, depending on the size of the species, additional space has to be provided. We had observed earlier nonischemic myocyte death bordering on the inflamed adventitia of collaterals and in close contact with lymphocytes. The pressure of the expanding vessel may have stimulated the myocytes to present MHC-II antigens invoking a deadly lymphocyte attack. Space for the expanding vessels is thus created by the loss of surrounding tissue. This proposed mechanism is imaginable especially in the tightly packed myocardium. It may not apply to the more loosely arranged peripheral collaterals of the mouse hind limb where some of the vessels are located subcutaneously. A more probable function may be the secretion of chemokines.

Thanks to the studies of van Weel and others we know now that lymphocytes as well as monocytes, well-known and well-specified bone marrow-derived cells, potently cooperate by creating collateral arteries. On the other hand we also know that the shear stressed collateral vessel wall activates other innate pathways important for growth, like the NO-pathway and the Rho pathway.15 What then would be the role of other circulating cells that are less well characterized, like endothelial progenitor cells? Is there a niche for them in this well-known and well-orchestrated cellular interaction that finally results in a fully functional artery originating from a preexisting arteriole? Originally it was assumed that EPCs are attracted to ischemic regions, attach to the collateral vessel wall, invade, undergo a metaplastic change, and become endothelial and smooth muscle cells that divide and proliferate.16 However, arteriogenesis proceeds in a normoxic environment,3 and detailed confocal studies by Ziegelhoeffer et al17 provided experimental proof that bone marrow-derived cells, found in the vicinity of growing collaterals, do not change into other cell types. Furthermore, EPCs are present in exceedingly low concentrations and the very high shear stress in collateral vessels may prevent their adhesion. Van Weel provided us with Ockham’s razor: among competing hypotheses, the simpler one is often closer to the truth. EPCs are most probably not needed for arteriogenesis that is so profoundly influenced by the innate immune system.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Disclosures

None.


*    References
up arrowTop
*References
 
1. Scholz D, Ziegelhoeffer T, Helisch A, Wagner S, Friedrich C, Podzuweit T, Schaper W. Contribution of arteriogenesis and angiogenesis to postocclusive hindlimb perfusion in mice. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2002; 34: 775–787.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Chalothorn D, Clayton JA, Zhang H, Pomp D, Faber JE. Collateral density, remodeling, and VEGF-A expression differ widely between mouse strains. Physiol Genomics. 2007; 30: 179–191.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Helisch A, Wagner S, Khan N, Drinane M, Wolfram S, Heil M, Ziegelhoeffer T, Brandt U, Pearlman JD, Swartz HM, Schaper W. Impact of mouse strain differences in innate hindlimb collateral vasculature. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006; 26: 520–526.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. van Weel V, Toes REM, Seghers LM, Deckers ML, Martin ML, de Vries SR, Eilers PH, Sipkens J, Schepers A, Eefting D, van Hinsbergh VWM, van Bockel JH, Quax PAH. Natural killer cells and CD4+ T-cells modulate collateral artery development. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007; 000: 000–000.

5. Fromer CH, Klintworth GK. An evaluation of the role of leukocytes in the pathogenesis of experimentally induced corneal vascularization. III. Studies related to the vasoproliferative capability of polymorphonuclear leukocytes and lymphocytes. Am J Pathol. 1976; 82: 157–70.[Abstract]

6. Schaper W. The collateral circulation of the heart. Dordrecht: North Holland Publishing Company; 1971.

7. Schaper J, Konig R, Franz D, Schaper W. The endothelial surface of growing coronary collateral arteries. Intimal margination and diapedesis of monocytes. A combined SEM and TEM study. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol. 1976; 370: 193–205.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Polverini PJ, Cotran PS, Gimbrone MA, Jr., Unanue ER. Activated macrophages induce vascular proliferation. Nature. 1977; 269: 804–6.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Sunderkotter C, Steinbrink K, Goebeler M, Bhardwaj R, Sorg C. Macrophages and angiogenesis. J Leukoc Biol. 1994; 55: 410–22.[Abstract]

10. Pipp F, Heil M, Issbrucker K, Ziegelhoeffer T, Martin S, van den Heuvel J, Weich H, Fernandez B, Golomb G, Carmeliet P, Schaper W, Clauss M. VEGFR-1-selective VEGF homologue PlGF is arteriogenic: evidence for a monocyte-mediated mechanism. Circ Res. 2003; 92: 378–85.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Heil M, Ziegelhoeffer T, Wagner S, Fernandez B, Helisch A, Martin S, Tribulova S, Kuziel WA, Bachmann G, Schaper W. Collateral artery growth (arteriogenesis) after experimental arterial occlusion is impaired in mice lacking CC-chemokine receptor-2. Circ Res. 2004; 94: 671–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Bergmann CE, Hoefer IE, Meder B, Roth H, van Royen N, Breit SM, Jost MM, Aharinejad S, Hartmann S, Buschmann IR. Arteriogenesis depends on circulating monocytes and macrophage accumulation and is severely depressed in op/op mice. J Leukoc Biol. 2006; 80: 59–65.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Hoefer IE, Grundmann S, van Royen N, Voskuil M, Schirmer SH, Ulusans S, Bode C, Buschmann IR, Piek JJ. Leukocyte subpopulations and arteriogenesis: specific role of monocytes, lymphocytes and granulocytes. Atherosclerosis. 2005; 181: 285–93.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Hoefer IE, van Royen N, Rectenwald JE, Bray EJ, Abouhamze Z, Moldawer LL, Voskuil M, Piek JJ, Buschmann IR, Ozaki CK. Direct evidence for tumor necrosis factor-alpha signaling in arteriogenesis. Circulation. 2002; 105: 1639–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Eitenmuller I, Volger O, Kluge A, Troidl K, Barancik M, Cai WJ, Heil M, Pipp F, Fischer S, Horrevoets AJ, Schmitz-Rixen T, Schaper W. The range of adaptation by collateral vessels after femoral artery occlusion. Circ Res. 2006; 99: 656–62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Urbich C, Heeschen C, Aicher A, Dernbach E, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Relevance of monocytic features for neovascularization capacity of circulating endothelial progenitor cells. Circulation. 2003; 108: 2511–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Ziegelhoeffer T, Fernandez B, Kostin S, Heil M, Voswinckel R, Helisch A, Schaper W. Bone marrow-derived cells do not incorporate into the adult growing vasculature. Circ Res. 2004; 94: 230–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Related Article:

Natural Killer Cells and CD4+ T-Cells Modulate Collateral Artery Development
V. van Weel, R.E.M. Toes, L. Seghers, M.M.L. Deckers, M.R. de Vries, P.H. Eilers, J. Sipkens, A. Schepers, D. Eefting, V.W.M. van Hinsbergh, J.H. van Bockel, and P.H.A. Quax
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2007 27: 2310-2318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/11/2273    most recent
ATVBAHA.107.153114v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schaper, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schaper, W.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article