Published online before print June 15, 2006, doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000232542.42968.e3
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Brief Reviews |
Transcriptional Regulators of Angiogenesis
From the Program in Cardiovascular Transcriptional Biology, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Correspondence to Mukesh K. Jain, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail mjain{at}rics.bwh.harvard.edu
Series Editor: Stephanie Dimmeler
Novel Mediators and Mechanisms in Angiogenesis and Vasculogenesis
ATVB In Focus
Previous Brief Reviews in this Series:
•Ferguson JE III, Kelley RW, Patterson C. Mechanisms of endothelial differentiation in embryonic vasculogenesis. 2005;25:2245–2254.
•Werner N, Nickenig G. Influence of cardiovascular risk factors on endothelial progenitor cells: limitations for therapy? 2006;26:257–266.
•van Hinsbergh VWM, Engelse MA, Quax PHA. Pericellular proteases in angiogenesis and vasculogenesis. 2006;26:716–728.
•Sata M. Role of circulating vascular progenitors in angiogenesis, vascular healing, and pulmonary hypertension: lessons from animal models. 2006;26:1008–1014.
•Liebner S, Cavallaro U, Dejana E. The multiple languages of endothelial cell-to-cell communication. 2006;26:1431–1438.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Top
Abstract
IntroductionAngiogenesis, the process by which new blood vessels develop from a pre-existing vascular network, is essential for normal development and in certain physiological states. Inadequate or excessive angiogenesis has been incriminated in a number of pathologic states. For example, vaso-occlusive disease arising from atherosclerosis can lead to ischemia, a situation in which enhanced angiogenesis would be beneficial. Conversely, overzealous angiogenesis can contribute to tumor development and in this case inhibition of angiogenesis is desirable. Thus, strategies to induce or inhibit angiogenesis are of considerable therapeutic interest.
Angiogenesis is essential for normal development and homeostasis. Inadequate angiogenesis results in ischemia whereas overzealous angiogenesis can contribute to tumor development. In recent years, several transcription factors have been identified as directors of the angiogenic process. These factors and the mechanisms by whidch they exert their effects are reviewed.
Key Words: angiogenesis • endothelium • transcription • gene regulation
|
Introduction |
|---|
The angiogenic process is regulated by a wide array of growth factors and signaling pathways. Ultimately, many of these mechanisms converge on nuclear events that regulate cellular gene expression. In this review we focus on a number of transcriptional pathways that have recently been implicated in angiogenesis. In the text and in the Table
, we have grouped specific molecules by the transcription factor class to which they belong. In the Figure, these factors are grouped according to cellular function. Because of space limitations we have excluded factors for which direct evidence (in vitro or in vivo) is lacking even if there is correlative evidence available. Furthermore, we will not discuss certain established pathways, such as hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1
), that have been the subject of numerous reviews.
|
|
|
|
Zinc-Finger Proteins |
|---|
Zinc-finger proteins (ZnF) constitute one of the most abundant classes of DNA binding proteins. The coordination of cysteine (C) and/or histidine (H) residues around a zinc ion forms an independent domain that protrudes as a finger-like projection. The number and spacing of these cysteine and/or histidine residues account for the different subclasses of ZnF proteins. Most DNA-binding ZnF proteins contain
3 fingers that contact DNA in the major groove.
Kruppel-Like Factors
Kruppel-like factors (KLF) are C2H2 zinc-finger proteins implicated in aspects of cellular growth and differentiation. KLF2 (Lung-Kruppel-like factor) was originally identified by Lingrel et al.1 KLF2 is induced by laminar flow, an important stimulus for endothelial differentiation and vascular remodeling.2 As such, it was not surprising that KLF2-null mice exhibited vascular defects. Targeting of this factor in mice has revealed important roles for KLF2 in multiple cell types including endothelial cells. Specifically, KLF2-deficient mice die in mid-gestation because of leaky blood vessels.3 More recently, studies from our laboratory show that adenoviral overexpression of KLF2 potently abrogates vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-mediated angiogenesis as well as tissue edema.4 This potent inhibitory effect appears to be caused, at least in part, by a reduction in expression of the key VEGF receptor VEGFR2.4 In addition, Dekker et al have also shown that KLF2 induces the potent anti-migratory factor SEMA3F that may also contribute to its anti-angiogenic effects.5 Studies from the laboratory of R. Nagai implicate a second KLF family member in regulating angiogenesis. KLF5 is expressed in activated endothelial cells and studies using KLF5+/– mice demonstrate impaired angiogenic activity in models of hind-limb ischemia and tumor implantation.6 Taken together these studies support an important role for KLFs in angiogenesis.
Vascular Endothelial Zinc Finger 1
Using a retroviral entrapment genetic screening strategy, Stuhlman et al identified vascular endothelial zinc finger protein 1 (Vezf1) on the basis of its endothelial restricted expression in the developing embryo.7 Vezf1 contains 6 C2H2 zinc fingers, is expressed at sites of postnatal angiogenesis, and can regulate endothelial gene products such as endothelin-1.8 Downregulation of Vezf1 expression in endothelial cells impairs proliferation, migration, and network formation.9 These data suggest that Vezf1 may normally function to promote aspects of angiogenesis.
Early Growth Response Factor 1
Early growth response factor 1 (Egr-1) is a broadly expressed C2H2 zinc-finger protein first discovered as an immediate early gene induced by serum. Egr-1 can induce a broad spectrum of growth factors, cytokines, receptors, adhesion molecules, and proteases implicated in angiogenesis. Using an RNA-cleaving phosphodiester-linked DNA-based enzyme approach to eliminate Egr-1 expression, Khachigian et al demonstrated a reduction in endothelial cell replication, migration, tubule formation, and fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-dependent angiogenesis.10 Consistent data were obtained when an inhibitor of Egr-1, Nab2, was shown to inhibit angiogenesis in vitro.11
|
Basic Helix-Loop-Helix |
|---|
Members of the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) family of transcriptional factors share a common sequence motif of a stretch of basic amino acids responsible for site-specific DNA binding adjacent to a helix-loop-helix domain. bHLH proteins play important roles in regulating gene expression by forming homodimers and heterodimers that bind to a 6-basepair DNA site with the consensus sequence CANNTG.
Inhibition of DNA Binding/Inhibitor of Cell Differentiation
Inhibition of DNA binding/inhibitor of cell differentiation (Id) proteins contain the helix-loop-helix that allows for heterodimerization with other members of this family but lack a DNA binding domain. As a consequence, Id proteins form inactive heterodimers with other bHLH factors and function in a dominant-negative fashion. The Id protein family is comprised of 4 members designated Id1, Id2, Id3, and Id4. They are widely expressed during development and are responsible for regulation of a variety of cellular processes including cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis.12 With respect to angiogenesis, Id1 and Id3 appear to be particularly important. Double-knockout mice (Id1–/–Id3–/–) are not viable and exhibit defects in neural differentiation and angiogenesis but not vasculogenesis. Furthermore, although mice with targeted disruption of Id1, Id2, or Id3 are viable, they exhibit a marked reduction in tumor angiogenesis and metastasis.13 The basis for these effects may be multifactorial as Id proteins have been shown to regulate the expression of multiple factors implicated in angiogenesis such as VEGF and its receptor VEGFR2,13–15 6 integrin, ß4 integrin, FGF receptor 1, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2, and thrombospondin (TSP-1).16,17
Stem Cell Leukemia/T-Cell Acute Leukemia-1
Stem cell leukemia (SCL) was originally identified as an oncogene in human T-cell leukemia.18 Gene-targeting studies showed SCL was essential for both normal yolk sac angiogenesis19 and adult hematopoiesis.20,21 In adult animals, SCL expression in nonhematopoietic cells is limited to endothelial cells lining new blood vessels.22,23 Furthermore, consistent with this observation, SCL expression is robust in endothelial cells of tumor vasculature but not in mature quiescent vasculature.24 Ectopic expression of SCL augmented endothelial cell chemotactic migration and accelerated capillary formation in vitro and in vivo.25
Heart and Neural Crest Derivatives
The heart and neural crest derivative (HAND) subfamily of bHLH proteins comprises 2 members: HAND 1 (eHAND, Hxt, Thing1) and HAND2 (dHAND, Hed, Thing2). Originally identified by protein interaction screens,26,27 HAND gene expression is restricted to heart, lateral mesoderm and neural crest derivatives. In addition, HAND1 is expressed in extra-embryonic membranes, whereas HAND2 is uniquely expressed within the maternal deciduum.26–28 Knockout analysis of HAND1 and HAND2 in mouse model resulted in embryonic lethality. Although vasculogenesis was unaltered in HAND1–/– yolk sacs, vascular refinement and smooth muscle cell recruitment was disrupted.29 In HAND2-null mice, endothelial differentiation was unaltered; however, endothelial cell patterning and smooth muscle cell differentiation were disrupted leading to abnormal vascular development.30 These studies implicate HAND factors as essential for embryonic vessel development. The role of these factors in adult angiogenesis remains to be elucidated.
Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Proteins
Sterol regulatory element binding proteins (SREBPs) are endoplasmic reticulum-bound transcription factors that are critical regulators of cellular cholesterol synthesis. In sterol-loaded cells SREPBs bind to and are inactivated by SREBP cleavage activating protein (SCAP). When sterol levels drop, SCAP transports SREBPs to the Golgi where they are cleaved, allowing nuclear translocation of the N-terminal end and transactivation of genes such as receptor, hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A (CoA) (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl [HMG] CoA) reductase and fatty acid synthase. Previous studies have shown that VEGF and bFGF modulate the microviscosity of the plasma membrane as part of their pro-angiogenic effect. VEGF activates SREBP1 and SREBP2 in endothelial cell in a SCAP- and Akt-dependent manner.31 Inhibition of SCAP blocks VEGF-induced pseudopodia extension and migration. Thus, SREBPs may influence angiogenesis via an initial step in the migration of endothelial cells.
Transcription Factor II-I
Transcription factor II-I (TFII-I) is a ubiquitously expressed basal transcription factor activated in response to a number of extracellular signals and functions through a core promoter site termed an initiator element (Inr). Wu and Patterson32 identified TFII-1 as capable of binding to a site within the basal promoter of the VEGFR2 (KDR/Flk-1) gene and regulating transcriptional activity in vitro and in vivo. More recently, Jackson et al33 extended these observations to show that TFII-1 can act at both basal and regulatory sites within the VEGFR2 promoter and that small inhibitory RNA (siRNA)-mediated knockdown of TFII-1 reduced VEGFR2 expression. Given the central importance of VEGFR2, these studies support a role for TFII-1 in angiogenesis. However, in vivo studies to date have been lacking.
|
Hey Factors |
|---|
The Hey family of factors (Hey 1, Hey2, HeyL) are key effectors of the Notch signaling pathway and critical regulators of cardiovascular development. With respect to vessel biology, these factors have been implicated in regulating vascular development and angiogenesis. In vitro, Hey 1 has been shown to regulate endothelial proliferation, migration, and tube formation.34 Surprisingly, targeting of Hey1 did not reveal any overt vascular phenotype. However, the combined loss of Hey1 and Hey2 was lethal with global lack of vascular remodeling and impaired arterial fate determination and maturation.35 Together, these finding suggest an important role of Hey proteins in angiogenesis.
|
Basic Leucine Zipper Protein |
|---|
Basic leucine zipper (bZIP) proteins contain 4 or 5 leucine residues spaced at intervals of seven amino acids, resulting in their hydrophobic side chains being exposed at one side of a helical region. Like bHLH, many bZIP transcription factors exert their functions by forming heterodimers of 2 different polypeptide chains, each containing one bZIP domain. Some members of this family of transcriptional regulators have been implicated to play a role in angiogenesis.
cAMP Response Element-Binding Proteins
The cAMP response element-binding (CREB) proteins are key transcriptional mediators of stimulus-induced nuclear responses that underlie the development and function of diverse cell types. The CREB family consists of CREB and two closely related factors termed CREM and ATF1. Several lines of evidence implicate CREB in angiogenesis. For example, CREB regulates the expression of a number of genes induced by hypoxia such as VEGF.36 CREB binding has been implicated in the regulation of 2 key VEGF receptors, VEGFR1 (Flt1)37 and VEGFR2 (Flk). Furthermore, VEGF binding to its cognate receptor VEGFR2 induced CREB phosphorylation at serine 133, and increased DNA-binding and transcriptional activity. Furthermore, overexpression of a constitutively active form of CREB enhanced tumor angiogenesis.
Activator Protein-1
Activator protein-1 (AP-1) transcription factors are dimers of proteins encoded by Jun (c-Jun, JunB, JunD), Fos (c-Fos, Fra-1, Fra-2, and FosB), and ATFs. Dimers formed between ATF and Jun preferentially bind to cAMP-responsive elements. Jun homodimers or the more stable Jun-Fos heterodimers regulate a large variety of biological processes including cell differentiation, proliferation, apoptosis, and oncogenic transformation. Targeting of c-Jun, JunB, Fra-1, and Fra-2 results in embryonic or early postnatal death. With respect to angiogenesis, several family members have been shown to regulate gene products implicated in angiogenesis. For example, c-Fos induces VEGF-D;38 Fra-1 induces urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), uPA receptor (uPAR) and various matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs),39,40 and c-Jun/JunB induces proliferin.41 In vivo evidence supporting a role has been more challenging given that, as noted, knockout of several family members results in nonviable animals. However, examination of the Fra-1-null embryos revealed evidence for inadequate placental vascularization suggesting that this factor promotes vessel development.42 In the case of JunD, animals are viable and thus amenable to further study. In the context of cancer biology recent studies show that JunD reduces tumor angiogenesis by limiting Ras-mediated production of reactive oxygen species.43 Furthermore, JunD-null mice exhibit higher cardiac capillary density and increased VEGF levels along with enhanced cardiomyocyte apoptosis in response to pressure overload.44 Taken together, these data suggest that members of the AP-1 family can differentially regulate angiogenesis.
|
Nuclear Receptors |
|---|
Chicken Ovalbumin Upstream Promoter-Transcription Factor II
Chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factors (COUPTF) are orphan members of the steroid/thyroid hormone superfamily. COUP-TFII-null mice die as embryos from defects in angiogenesis and heart development.45 These mice show decreased expression of angiopoietin-1 (ang-1) and defective remodeling of the primitive capillary plexus into large and small microcapillaries, a pattern suggesting disrupted mesenchymal-endothelial interactions. COUP-TFII and ets-1 are colocalized in mesenchymal cells during embryogenesis, and ets-1 can transactivate a COUP-TFII construct in transient transfections.46 COUP-TFII can confer an invasive phenotype to human lung carcinoma cell lines by inducing MMP-2 and uPA/uPAR,47 reminiscent of similar modulation of MMP-2 and uPA seen during angiogenesis.
Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptors
Peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) are ligand-activated nuclear receptors that have well-established pleiotropic roles in cell metabolism and tend to confer anti-proliferative and pro-differentiation properties. The 3 isoforms, PPAR, PPAR
, and PPARß/
, are all receptors for the class of synthetic ligands called thiazolidinediones well as for natural ligands, the most widely studied of which is the prostaglandin 15 deoxy-PGJ2. The effects of PPARs on angiogenesis have been subject to an excellent recent review48 and readers are referred thereto for comprehensive references. Briefly, PPAR is expressed in endothelial cells and inhibits angiogenesis at multiple steps. Activation by ligand decreases tube formation, the proliferative response to VEGF, bFGF, and phorbol myristate acetate, and angiogenesis in the rat cornea.49,50 PPAR ligands also inhibit leptin-induced Akt-mediated endothelial cell migration.51 Importantly, PPAR activation can inhibit inflammation-independent angiogenesis such as in the chicken chorioallantoic membrane as well as angiogenesis induced by the inflammatory mediators ELR+ and CXC chemokines IL-8, ENA-78 and Gro-a in tumors.52
|
Helix-Turn-Helix |
|---|
Homeobox Factors
The homeobox (HOX) family members contain a helix-turn-helix DNA-binding homeodomain and have critical roles in pattern formation and organogenesis, where they regulate cell differentiation, proliferation, and migration. More recently, they have been shown to regulate these same processes during adult neovascularization.53 Ex vivo models of adult neovascularization indicate that HOX gene products have both complementary and antagonistic functions. For example, HOXD3 increases the invasive and migratory behavior of the transformed cell line HMEC-1, whereas its paralog HOXB3 enhances subsequent capillary morphogenesis.54 However, HOXD10, GAX and HEX have effects that are nonangiogenic.55–57 Interestingly, much of the data available thus far indicate that the mechanism of function for these transcription factors is via regulation of genes that contribute to remodeling of the extracellular matrix, rather than a direct effect on endothelial cell proliferation. Thus, HOXD3 upregulates
vß3 integrin and collagen 1,58,59 and HOXA3 increases, whereas HOXD10 decreases, MMP-14 and uPAR expression.55,60 A growth factor-independent function of HOXD3 is suggested by a study demonstrating up-regulation of HOXD3 as a result of the binding of the extracellular protein Del-1 to integrin vß5.61 More traditional angiogenic targets have also been highlighted in studies of HOXA9, whose pro-angiogenic effects are mediated at least in part via direct effects on the up-regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and VEGFR262 and downregulation of ephrin B4.63
E26 Transformation Specific
The E26 transformation specific (ETS) family of transcription factors is characterized by a conserved winged helix-turn-helix structural motif that serves as the DNA-binding domain. In the early 1990s, ets-1 was the first member of this family to be recognized as a critical factor in vascular development and angiogenesis. The characterization of ets-1 and early information about other members of this family has been summarized in a review by Sato.64 Since that time, ets-1 has been shown to be a potent stimulator of angiogenesis in vivo65 and to be negatively regulated by SP100.66 Additional members of the ETS family have since been identified as regulators of angiogenesis. For example, novel ets transcriptional factor 2 (NERF2) is highly expressed in endothelial cells and upregulates the expression of Tie2 (the ang-1 receptor), an effect that may be most important under hypoxic conditions.67 Elf-1 is expressed in a subset of endothelial cells and can transactivate both the Tie1 and Tie2 promoters68 as well as the angiopoietin-2 (ang-2) promoter.69 Ras/MAPK-dependent phosphorylation of Ets-2 was demonstrated to be required for tubule formation by transformed EC lines and able to transactivate the CD13/APN promoter, a metallopeptidase with angiogenic properties.70 ESE-1 expression is induced in endothelial cells in response to inflammatory mediators where it then mediates transcription of ang-1.71 This is particularly interesting as ang-1, although known to be induced under inflammatory conditions, does not have obvious binding sites for the traditional mediators of inflammation including NF-kB, STAT, NFAT, or C/EPB. Finally, downregulation of Net (Elk-3/Sap-2/ERP) has been demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo to inhibit angiogenesis and VEGF expression. Net is converted from a transcriptional repressor to a transcriptional activator via the Ras/MAPK pathway.72
|
MADS-Box Factors |
|---|
Myocyte enhancer factor-2 (MEF2) proteins comprise a subfamily of the MADS (MCM1, agamous, deficiens, serum response factor)-box factors and are best known as critical regulators of muscle development and differentiation. Four MEF2 factors—MEF2A, MEF2B, MEF2C, and MEF2D—have been identified to date. MEF2C is expressed in developing endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, and surrounding mesenchyme during embryogenesis.73 Mice carrying a mutant MEF2C gene die early during embryogenesis and exhibit multiple vascular defects including the failure of endothelial cells to organize into complex vascular structures and inadequate smooth muscle cell differentiation.73,74 Information regarding the role of this family of factors in adult angiogenesis is lacking.
|
Smad Family |
|---|
The founding member of the Smad family was first identified as the product of drosophila gene mothers against decapentaplegic (MAD). This discovery led to the identification of Mad-related gene products, referred to as Smads in nematodes and vertebrates. Smad proteins are a component of the transforming growth factor ß (TGFß) signaling pathway and function downstream of the TGFß receptor to directly transduce signals from the cell membrane into the nucleus. There are 9 vertebrate Smads: pathway-specific Smads1, 2, 3, 5, and 8 and MADH6; the common mediator Smad4; and the inhibitory Smads 6 and 7. Smad2 and 3 act as the downstream mediators of TGFß and activin receptors, whereas Smad1 and 5 respond to bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signals. Because TGFß has been shown to have both pro-angiogenic and anti-angiogenic effects depending on the status of the cell, it is conceivable that Smad proteins are important transcriptional factors that mediate those effects. Studies of Smad5-null embryos revealed obvious defects in angiogenesis.75 At E9.0, the yolk sacs of Smad5-null mice lacked a well-organized yolk sac vasculature, a defect that may be caused by a failure of communication between endothelium and mesenchyme during angiogenesis. Smad4, the only Smad protein involved in signaling pathways of all members of the TGFß superfamily, has a central role in mediating TGFß effects. It was originally identified as a tumor suppressor gene DPC4 (deleted in pancreatic carcinoma). In fact, the most potent mechanism underlying Smad4-mediated tumor suppression is via inhibition of angiogenesis,76 which involves both downregulation of VEGF and upregulation of TSP-1. Smad3 is becoming recognized as a pro-angiogenic factor due to the fact that it mediates TGFß1-stimulated VEGF-A expression.77,78 In contrast, Smad2 has been implicated in promoting the production of anti-angiogenic factors such as TSP-1 and the soluble VEGF-A receptor Flt-1(sVEGFR1).77 Together, these results demonstrate that Smad proteins play distinct and opposing roles in regulating expression of angiogenic factors.
|
Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription |
|---|
The signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) factor are a family of transcription factors that are activated by cytokines, growth factors, and hormones. Seven family members have been identified and shown to play crucial roles in different physiological processes such as cellular differentiation, proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis.79 Among this family, STAT3 has emerged as particularly important in the context of angiogenesis. STAT3 is a direct transcriptional activator of HIF-1 and VEGF in a broad range of human cancers.80,81 Transgenic overexpression of STAT3 in the heart resulted in increased VEGF expression and capillary density.82 Conversely, cardiomyocyte-restricted deletion of STAT3 resulted in reduced myocardial capillary density.83 Consistent with these observations, targeting of STAT3 with a small-molecule inhibitor blocked HIF-1/VEGF expression in vitro and tumor angiogenesis in vivo.84 These studies established an essential role of Stat3 in controlling cardiac capillary vasculature.
|
The Nuclear Factor of Activated T Cells |
|---|
Members of the nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) family of transcriptional factors normally reside in the cytoplasm and on stimulation translocate to the nucleus to affect cellular gene expression. Four main family members have been identified to date termed NFATc (NFAT2/NFATc1), NFATp (NFAT1/NFATc2), NFAT3 (NFATc4), and NFAT4 (NFATc3). Studies to date implicate several members in embryonic and adult angiogenesis. While targeting of NFATc3 and c4 revealed viable animals, the double-knockout results in embryonic death.85 Examination of the NFATc3/4-null mice demonstrated disorganized major vessels including the intersomitic vessels, branchial arch arteries, and cranial vessels. No defect was observed in the differentiation and proliferation of mutant endothelial cells. However, null embryos exhibited reduced association of smooth muscle cells and pericytes indicating that NFATc3/4 are required for recruitment of these cells to the vessel wall. In the adult vasculature, NFAT1 is the dominant form expressed. NFAT1 is activated by pro-angiogenic factors such as VEGF/bFGF and inhibited by anti-angiogenic molecules such as pigment epithelial-derived factor (PEDF). NFAT1 activation has been shown to increase pro-angiogenic/pro-inflammatory factors such as tissue factor and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2).86,87 Furthermore, VEGF-induced NFAT directly upregulates expression of the caspase-8 inhibitor cellular Fas-associated death domain-like IL1ß-converting enzyme inhibitory protein (c-FLIP), which mediates resistance to apoptotic signaling.88 Finally, a mechanistic rationale for the potential importance of the NFAT pathway in the angiogenesis seen in diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis is supported by the observation that treatment of endothelial cells with the immunosuppressive drug cyclosporine prevents VEGF-mediated angiogenesis at least in part by inhibiting the NFAT-dependent upregulation of COX-2.86 Taken together these studies implicate the NFAT family as critical regulators of embryonic and adult angiogenesis.
|
Runt Domain Factors |
|---|
The RUNX transcription factors are members of the Ig-loop DNA-binding family of proteins that contain a conserved Runt-homology domain. The group consists of at least 3 phosphorylated
subunits which have several alternative names abbreviated from the core "runt-related gene/core binding factor/acute myeloid leukemia/polyoma enhancer-binding protein 2," ie, RUNX1/Cbf2/AML1/PEBP2B, RUNX2/Cbf1/AML3/PEBP2A, and RUNX3/Cbf3/AML2/PEBP2C. Each of these heterodimerizes with a single ß subunit, Cbfß. Mice deficient in either RUNX1 or RUNX2 die as embryos or soon after birth with a defect in definitive hematopoiesis (RUNX1)89 or ossification (RUNX2).90,91 RUNX1 is expressed in endothelial cell lines and at sites of angiogenesis in vivo and is induced by bFGF and VEGF. A dominant-negative construct impairs endothelial cell proliferation, migration, and tube formation,92 whereas overexpression of RUNX1 in endothelial progenitors leads to enhanced expression of vascular endothelial cadherin (VE-cadherin) and the formation of vascular networks, demonstrating a role in endothelial cell differentiation and maturation.93 Interestingly, in RUNX2-deficient mice, although there is normal vascularity of the perichondrium and surrounding tissue, there is a lack of blood vessel invasion into areas of hypertrophied chondrocytes, a process required for the transformation of cartilage to bone.94 In human bone marrow endothelial cells, a dominant-negative RUNX2 causes decreased endothelial cell differentiation and impairs growth arrest.95 |
Forkhead Factors |
|---|
The FOXO subclass of forkhead transcription factors (FKHR/FOXO1, FKHRL1/FOXO3a, AFX/FOXO4) has been shown to have roles in stress responses, control of cell cycle, and apoptosis. Recent studies also implicate this family of factors in angiogenesis. FOXO1-null mice die on embryonic day 10 to 11 with defects in vasculogenesis and angiogenesis.96,97 Histological analyses revealed defects in the dorsal aorta, hypoplastic branchial arches, and absence of distinct yolk sac blood vessels. FOXO3a-null mice demonstrated only abnormalities of ovarian follicular development, and FOXO4-null mice had no obvious phenotype.96 However, both FOXO1 and FOXO3a have been shown to regulate postnatal neovascularization.98 Overexpression of either of these transcription factors inhibited endothelial cell migration and tube formation in vitro, and knockdown significantly increased migration and sprout formation. Both FOXO1 and FOXO3a bind to and transrepress the eNOS promoter. eNOS is essential for postnatal neovascularization, and FOXO3a-null mice reflect this by demonstrating increased eNOS expression and postnatal neovascularization.
Regulation of the cell cycle by FOXO1 and FOXO4 is mediated by FOXO-dependent induction of expression of p27KIP1, which causes growth suppression and increased endothelial cell apoptosis.99,100 Akt-dependent phosphorylation of FOXO proteins leads to sequestration in the cytoplasm and, thus, inactivation. This mechanism has been demonstrated after cytokine induction of the PI3K/Akt pathway,99 with treatment of endothelial cells with epoxyeicosatrienoic acid101 and after addition of ang-1.102 By activating Akt, ang-1 blocks FOXO1-induced apoptosis and FOXO1-mediated gene expression. Furthermore, microarray analysis of endothelial cells over-expressing FOXO1 shows enhanced expression of genes associated with vascular destabilization and remodeling. Finally, in Tet-on HeLa cells, FOXO4 inhibits hypoxia-induced HIF-1 by mediating proteosomal degradation of HIF-1 by a mechanism different from the previously described von Hippel Lindau-dependent ubiquitin-mediated process.103 This may represent a novel mechanism for hypoxic regulation. However, endogenous FOXO4 has not been demonstrated in endothelial cells,101 nor does exogenous expression have an effect on neovascularization.98
|
Histone Deacetylases |
|---|
Histone deacetylases (HDACs) modulate chromatin structure and associate with transcription factors involved in repressing gene expression. A function in angiogenesis is suggested by the fact that HDAC1 is induced by hypoxia in multiple cell types. Overexpression of HDAC1 downregulated p53 and von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor genes and stimulated angiogenesis in human endothelial cells.104 Inhibition of HDAC1 upregulated the aforementioned genes and also inhibited HIF-1
and VEGF expression. Thus HDAC1 may regulate hypoxia-mediated angiogenesis. |
Notch |
|---|
Notch family receptors are associated with the plasma membrane and are cleaved on activation by ligand binding. The intracellular domain of the receptor then translocates into the nucleus and acts as a transcriptional coactivator. Members of the Notch family are expressed in the endothelium and targeted mutations of many, including Notch1,105 result in vascular defects. VEGF, but not bFGF, induces Notch1 and its ligand Dll4 in human arterial endothelial cells (but not in human umbilical vein endothelial cells) via activation of Akt.106 Constitutive activation of Notch1 enhances formation of arterial endothelial cell tubule formation. Thus Notch1/Dll4 may have a particularly important role in arteriogenesis.
|
Summary |
|---|
As reviewed, the past few years have witnessed the identification of many transcriptional regulators of angiogenesis. Although these studies have provided novel scientific information, much remains to be done. Several key questions are: (1) precisely which step(s) in the angiogenic process does each factor affect?; (2) can this effect be verified in more than one model of angiogenesis in vivo?; (3) are the observed effects of a factor critical during embryonic angiogenesis, adult angiogenesis, or both?; (4) does the specific transcription factor cooperate with others to exact its angiogenic effects?; and (5) can the expression/function of a specific transcription factor be altered in a therapeutically beneficial manner?
Angiogenesis is a complex multistep process that involves degradation of the extracellular matrix, endothelial cell migration and proliferation, tube formation, and vessel maturation with investment of pericytes and/or smooth muscle cells. Studies on a specific factor have, to date, often focused on a single or very restricted number of steps in this process. Furthermore, many studies have been limited to in vitro assays. Moving forward, it will be critical that more detailed studies for each individual factor be undertaken in order to gain a more comprehensive understanding of its role in the angiogenic process. Additionally, studies should be extended to at least one (and preferably more than one) in vivo model of angiogenesis. This is an important point as the milieu of tumor angiogenesis may be quite different than that seen, for example, during embryogenesis or in response to a specific stimulus (eg, specific growth factor or cytokine).
Transcription factors clearly do not function in a vacuum. Interaction and cooperation with other transcriptional regulators, components of the general transcriptional machinery, and chromatin-modifying factors can have profound cellular effects. An understanding of the transcriptional hierarchy and network is critical to gaining a more complete understanding of how specific factors regulate the complex angiogenic process.
Finally, identification of novel transcriptional pathways that regulate angiogenesis offers, in principal, the foundation for novel therapeutic strategies. Traditionally, transcription factors have not served as attractive targets. However, the nuclear receptor family (eg, PPARs) is a notable exception. These factors are activated in the cytoplasm by ligand binding, with subsequent translocation to the nucleus to affect gene expression. Of particular interest is that potential PPAR ligands include currently prescribed oral medications. In the same vein, recent studies demonstrate that KLF2 expression can be induced by statins. Given that both high doses of statins and KLF2 can inhibit angiogenesis, this raises the interesting possibility that some of the anti-angiogenic properties of statins may be, in part, KLF2 dependent. If so, a rationale would be provided to explore the Kruppel-like factors as targets for pharmaceutical agents aimed to inhibit angiogenesis.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
This work was partly supported by National Institutes of Health grants HL69477 (M.K.J.), HL72952 (M.K.J.), HL75427 (M.K.J.), HL76754 (M.K.J.), P01 HL48743 (M.K.J.), T32 HOLO 760420 (A.H.), and the Alliance for Cancer Gene Therapy (M.K.J.).
Disclosures
None.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
Original received November 3, 2005; final version accepted June 2, 2006.
|
References |
|---|
1. Anderson KP, Kern CB, Crable SC, Lingrel JB. Isolation of a gene encoding a functional zinc finger protein homologous to erythroid Kruppel-like factor: identification of a new multigene family. Molecular & Cellular Biology. 1995; 15: 5957–5965.[Abstract]
2. Dekker RJ, van Soest S, Fontijn RD, Salamanca S, de Groot PG, VanBavel E, Pannekoek H, Horrevoets AJ. Prolonged fluid shear stress induces a distinct set of endothelial cell genes, most specifically lung Kruppel-like factor (KLF2). Blood. 2002; 100: 1689–1698.
3. Kuo CT, Veselits ML, Barton KP, Lu MM, Clendenin C, Leiden JM. The LKLF transcription factor is required for normal tunica media formation and blood vessel stabilization during murine embryogenesis. Genes Dev. 1997; 11: 2996–3006.
4. Bhattacharya R, Senbanerjee S, Lin Z, Mir S, Hamik A, Wang P, Mukherjee P, Mukhopadhyay D, Jain MK. Inhibition of vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated angiogenesis by the Kruppel-like factor KLF2. J Biol Chem. 2005; 280: 28848–28851.
5. Dekker RJ, Boon RA, Rondaij MG, Kragt A, Volger OL, Elderkamp YW, Meijers JC, Voorberg J, Pannekoek H, Horrevoets AJ KLF2 provokes a gene expression pattern that establishes functional quiescent differentiation of the endothelium. Blood. 2006.
6. Shindo T, Manabe I, Fukushima Y, Tobe K, Aizawa K, Miyamoto S, Kawai-Kowase K, Moriyama N, Imai Y, Kawakami H, Nishimatsu H, Ishikawa T, Suzuki T, Morita H, Maemura K, Sata M, Hirata Y, Komukai M, Kagechika H, Kadowaki T, Kurabayashi M, Nagai R. Kruppel-like zinc-finger transcription factor KLF5/BTEB2 is a target for angiotensin II signaling and an essential regulator of cardiovascular remodeling. Nat Med. 2002; 8: 856–863.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Xiong JW, Leahy A, Lee HH, Stuhlmann H. Vezf1: A Zn finger transcription factor restricted to endothelial cells and their precursors. Dev Biol. 1999; 206: 123–141.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Aitsebaomo J, Wennerberg K, Der CJ, Zhang C, Kedar V, Moser M, Kingsley-Kallesen ML, Zeng GQ, Patterson C. p68RacGAP is a novel GTPase-activating protein that interacts with vascular endothelial zinc finger-1 and modulates endothelial cell capillary formation. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279: 17963–17972.
9. Miyashita H, Kanemura M, Yamazaki T, Abe M, Sato Y. Vascular endothelial zinc finger 1 is involved in the regulation of angiogenesis: possible contribution of stathmin/OP18 as a downstream target gene. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24: 878–884.
10. Fahmy RG, Dass CR, Sun LQ, Chesterman CN, Khachigian LM. Transcription factor Egr-1 supports FGF-dependent angiogenesis during neovascularization and tumor growth. Nat Med. 2003; 9: 1026–1032.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Lucerna M, Mechtcheriakova D, Kadl A, Schabbauer G, Schafer R, Gruber F, Koshelnick Y, Muller HD, Issbrucker K, Clauss M, Binder BR, Hofer E. NAB2, a corepressor of EGR-1, inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated gene induction and angiogenic responses of endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278: 11433–11440.
12. Ruzinova MB, Benezra R. Id proteins in development, cell cycle and cancer. Trends Cell Biol. 2003; 13: 410–418.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Lyden D, Young AZ, Zagzag D, Yan W, Gerald W, O’Reilly R, Bader BL, Hynes RO, Zhuang Y, Manova K, Benezra R. Id1 and Id3 are required for neurogenesis, angiogenesis and vascularization of tumour xenografts. Nature. 1999; 401: 670–677.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Lasorella A, Rothschild G, Yokota Y, Russell RG, Iavarone A. Id2 mediates tumor initiation, proliferation, and angiogenesis in Rb mutant mice. Mol Cell Biol. 2005; 25: 3563–3574.
15. Ling MT, Lau TC, Zhou C, Chua CW, Kwok WK, Wang Q, Wang X, Wong YC. Overexpression of Id-1 in prostate cancer cells promotes angiogenesis through the activation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Carcinogenesis. 2005; 26: 1668–1676.
16. Volpert OV, Pili R, Sikder HA, Nelius T, Zaichuk T, Morris C, Shiflett CB, Devlin MK, Conant K, Alani RM. Id1 regulates angiogenesis through transcriptional repression of thrombospondin-1. Cancer Cell. 2002; 2: 473–483.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Ruzinova MB, Schoer RA, Gerald W, Egan JE, Pandolfi PP, Rafii S, Manova K, Mittal V, Benezra R. Effect of angiogenesis inhibition by Id loss and the contribution of bone-marrow-derived endothelial cells in spontaneous murine tumors. Cancer Cell. 2003; 4: 277–289.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Chen Q, Cheng JT, Tasi LH, Schneider N, Buchanan G, Carroll A, Crist W, Ozanne B, Siciliano MJ, Baer R. The tal gene undergoes chromosome translocation in T cell leukemia and potentially encodes a helix-loop-helix protein. Embo J. 1990; 9: 415–424.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Visvader JE, Fujiwara Y, Orkin SH. Unsuspected role for the T-cell leukemia protein SCL/tal-1 in vascular development. Genes Dev. 1998; 12: 473–479.
20. Robb L, Elwood NJ, Elefanty AG, Kontgen F, Li R, Barnett LD, Begley CG. The scl gene product is required for the generation of all hematopoietic lineages in the adult mouse. EMBO J. 1996; 15: 4123–4129.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Sanchez MJ, Bockamp EO, Miller J, Gambardella L, Green AR. Selective rescue of early haematopoietic progenitors in Scl(-/-) mice by expressing Scl under the control of a stem cell enhancer. Development. 2001; 128: 4815–4827.
22. Kallianpur AR, Jordan JE, Brandt SJ. The SCL/TAL-1 gene is expressed in progenitors of both the hematopoietic and vascular systems during embryogenesis. Blood. 1994; 83: 1200–1208.
23. Pulford K, Lecointe N, Leroy-Viard K, Jones M, Mathieu-Mahul D, Mason DY. Expression of TAL-1 proteins in human tissues. Blood. 1995; 85: 675–684.
24. Chetty R, Dada MA, Boshoff CH, Comley MA, Biddolph SC, Schneider JW, Mason DY, Pulford KA, Gatter KC. TAL-1 protein expression in vascular lesions. J Pathol. 1997; 181: 311–315.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Lazrak M, Deleuze V, Noel D, Haouzi D, Chalhoub E, Dohet C, Robbins I, Mathieu D. The bHLH TAL-1/SCL regulates endothelial cell migration and morphogenesis. J Cell Sci. 2004; 117: 1161–1171.
26. Cross JC, Flannery ML, Blanar MA, Steingrimsson E, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG, Rutter WJ, Werb Z. Hxt encodes a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor that regulates trophoblast cell development. Development. 1995; 121: 2513–2523.[Abstract]
27. Hollenberg SM, Sternglanz R, Cheng PF, Weintraub H. Identification of a new family of tissue-specific basic helix-loop-helix proteins with a two-hybrid system. Mol Cell Biol. 1995; 15: 3813–3822.[Abstract]
28. Cserjesi P, Brown D, Lyons GE, Olson EN. Expression of the novel basic helix-loop-helix gene eHAND in neural crest derivatives and extraembryonic membranes during mouse development. Dev Biol. 1995; 170: 664–678.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Morikawa Y, Cserjesi P. Extra-embryonic vasculature development is regulated by the transcription factor HAND1. Development. 2004; 131: 2195–2204.
30. Yamagishi H, Olson EN, Srivastava D. The basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor, dHAND, is required for vascular development. J Clin Invest. 2000; 105: 261–270.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Zhou R-H, Yao M, Lee T-S, Zhu Y, Martins-Green M, Shyy JY-J. Vascular endothelial growth factor activation of sterol regulatory element binding protein: a potential role in angiogenesis. Circ Res. 2004; 95: 471–478.
32. Wu Y, Patterson C. The human KDR/flk-1 gene contains a functional initiator element that is bound and transactivated by TFII-I. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274: 3207–3214.
33. Jackson TA, Taylor HE, Sharma D, Desiderio S, Danoff SK. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2: counter-regulation by the transcription factors, TFII-I and TFII-IRD1 J Biol Chem. 2005; 280: 29856–29863.
34. Henderson AM, Wang SJ, Taylor AC, Aitkenhead M, Hughes CC. The basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor HESR1 regulates endothelial cell tube formation. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 6169–6176.
35. Fischer A, Schumacher N, Maier M, Sendtner M, Gessler M. The Notch target genes Hey1 and Hey2 are required for embryonic vascular development. Genes Dev. 2004; 18: 901–911.
36. Mayo LD, Kessler KM, Pincheira R, Warren RS, Donner DB. Vascular endothelial cell growth factor activates CRE-binding protein by signaling through the KDR receptor tyrosine kinase. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 25184–25189.
37. Morishita K, Johnson DE, Williams LT. A novel promoter for vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (flt-1) that confers endothelial-specific gene expression. J Biol Chem. 1995; 270: 27948–27953.
38. Marconcini L, Marchio S, Morbidelli L, Cartocci E, Albini A, Ziche M, Bussolino F, Oliviero S. c-fos-induced growth factor/vascular endothelial growth factor D induces angiogenesis in vivo and in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96: 9671–9676.
39. Kustikova O, Kramerov D, Grigorian M, Berezin V, Bock E, Lukanidin E, Tulchinsky E. Fra-1 induces morphological transformation and increases in vitro invasiveness and motility of epithelioid adenocarcinoma cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1998; 18: 7095–7105.
40. Belguise K, Kersual N, Galtier F, Chalbos D. FRA-1 expression level regulates proliferation and invasiveness of breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 2005; 24: 1434–1444.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Toft DJ, Rosenberg SB, Bergers G, Volpert O, Linzer DI. Reactivation of proliferin gene expression is associated with increased angiogenesis in a cell culture model of fibrosarcoma tumor progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98: 13055–13059.
42. Schreiber M, Wang ZQ, Jochum W, Fetka I, Elliott C, Wagner EF. Placental vascularisation requires the AP-1 component fra1. Development. 2000; 127: 4937–4948.[Abstract]
43. Gerald D, Berra E, Frapart YM, Chan DA, Giaccia AJ, Mansuy D, Pouyssegur J, Yaniv M, Mechta-Grigoriou F. JunD reduces tumor angiogenesis by protecting cells from oxidative stress. Cell. 2004; 118: 781–794.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Hilfiker A, Kaminski K, Schaefer A, Park JK, Michel K, Quint A, Yaniv M, Weitzman JB, Drexler H. Lack of JunD promotes pressure overload-induced apoptosis, hypertrophic growth, and angiogenesis in the heart. Circulation. 2005; 112: 1470–1477.
45. Pereira FA, Qiu Y, Zhou G, Tsai MJ, Tsai SY. The orphan nuclear receptor COUP-TFII is required for angiogenesis and heart development. Genes Dev. 1999; 13: 1037–1049.
46. Huggins GS, Bacani CJ, Boltax J, Aikawa R, Leiden JM. Friend of GATA 2 physically interacts with chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-TF2 (COUP-TF2) and COUP-TF3 and represses COUP-TF2-dependent activation of the atrial natriuretic factor promoter. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 28029–28036.
47. Navab R, Gonzalez-Santos JM, Johnston MR, Liu J, Brodt P, Tsao MS, Hu J. Expression of chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor II enhances invasiveness of human lung carcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 2004; 64: 5097–5105.
48. Panigrahy D, Huang S, Kieran MW, Kaipainen A. PPARgamma as a therapeutic target for tumor angiogenesis and metastasis. Cancer Biol Ther. 2005; 4: 687–693.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Xin X, Yang S, Kowalski J, Gerritsen ME. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma ligands are potent inhibitors of angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274: 9116–9121.
50. Panigrahy D, Singer S, Shen LQ, Butterfield CE, Freedman DA, Chen EJ, Moses MA, Kilroy S, Duensing S, Fletcher C, Fletcher JA, Hlatky L, Hahnfeldt P, Folkman J, Kaipainen A. PPARgamma ligands inhibit primary tumor growth and metastasis by inhibiting angiogenesis. J Clin Invest. 2002; 110: 923–932.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Goetze S, Bungenstock A, Czupalla C, Eilers F, Stawowy P, Kintscher U, Spencer-Hansch C, Graf K, Nurnberg B, Law RE, Fleck E, Grafe M. Leptin induces endothelial cell migration through Akt, which is inhibited by PPARgamma-ligands. Hypertension. 2002; 40: 748–754.
52. Keshamouni VG, Arenberg DA, Reddy RC, Newstead MJ, Anthwal S, Standiford TJ. PPAR-gamma activation inhibits angiogenesis by blocking ELR+CXC chemokine production in non-small cell lung cancer. Neoplasia. 2005; 7: 294–301.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. Gorski DH, Walsh K. Control of vascular cell differentiation by homeobox transcription factors. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2003; 13: 213–220.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
54. Myers C, Charboneau A, Boudreau N. Homeobox B3 promotes capillary morphogenesis and angiogenesis. J Cell Biol. 2000; 148: 343–352.
55. Myers C, Charboneau A, Cheung I, Hanks D, Boudreau N. Sustained expression of homeobox D10 inhibits angiogenesis. Am J Pathol. 2002; 161: 2099–2109.
56. Patel S, Leal AD, Gorski DH. The homeobox gene Gax inhibits angiogenesis through inhibition of nuclear factor-kappaB-dependent endothelial cell gene expression. Cancer Res. 2005; 65: 1414–1424.
57. Nakagawa T, Abe M, Yamazaki T, Miyashita H, Niwa H, Kokubun S, Sato Y. HEX acts as a negative regulator of angiogenesis by modulating the expression of angiogenesis-related gene in endothelial cells in vitro. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23: 231–237.
58. Boudreau N, Andrews C, Srebrow A, Ravanpay A, Cheresh DA. Induction of the Angiogenic Phenotype by Hox D3. J Cell Biol. 1997; 139: 257–264.
59. Uyeno LA, Newman-Keagle JA, Cheung I, Hunt TK, Young DM, Boudreau N. Hox D3 expression in normal and impaired wound healing. J Surg Res. 2001; 100: 46–56.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
60. Mace KA, Hansen SL, Myers C, Young DM, Boudreau N. HOXA3 induces cell migration in endothelial and epithelial cells promoting angiogenesis and wound repair. J Cell Sci. 2005; 118: 2567–2577.
61. Zhong J, Eliceiri B, Stupack D, Penta K, Sakamoto G, Quertermous T, Coleman M, Boudreau N, Varner JA. Neovascularization of ischemic tissues by gene delivery of the extracellular matrix protein Del-1. J Clin Invest. 2003; 112: 30–41.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
62. Rossig L, Li H, Fisslthaler B, Urbich C, Fleming I, Forstermann U, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Inhibitors of histone deacetylation downregulate the expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase and compromise endothelial cell function in vasorelaxation and angiogenesis. Circ Res. 2002; 91: 837–844.
63. Bruhl T, Urbich C, Aicher D, Acker-Palmer A, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Homeobox A9 transcriptionally regulates the EphB4 receptor to modulate endothelial cell migration and tube formation. Circ Res. 2004; 94: 743–751.
64. Sato Y. Role of ETS family transcription factors in vascular development and angiogenesis. Cell Struct Funct. 2001; 26: 19–24.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
65. Hashiya N, Jo N, Aoki M, Matsumoto K, Nakamura T, Sato Y, Ogata N, Ogihara T, Kaneda Y, Morishita R. In vivo evidence of angiogenesis induced by transcription factor Ets-1: Ets-1 is located upstream of angiogenesis cascade. Circulation. 2004; 109: 3035–3041.
66. Yordy JS, Moussa O, Pei H, Chaussabel D, Li R, Watson DK. SP100 inhibits ETS1 activity in primary endothelial cells. Oncogene. 2005; 24: 916–931.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
67. Christensen RA, Fujikawa K, Madore R, Oettgen P, Varticovski L. NERF2, a member of the Ets family of transcription factors, is increased in response to hypoxia and angiopoietin-1: a potential mechanism for Tie2 regulation during hypoxia. J Cell Biochem. 2002; 85: 505–515.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
68. Dube A, Thai S, Gaspar J, Rudders S, Libermann TA, Iruela-Arispe L, Oettgen P. Elf-1 is a transcriptional regulator of the Tie2 gene during vascular development. Circ Res. 2001; 88: 237–244.
69. Hegen A, Koidl S, Weindel K, Marme D, Augustin HG, Fiedler U. Expression of angiopoietin-2 in endothelial cells is controlled by positive and negative regulatory promoter elements. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24: 1803–1809.
70. Petrovic N, Bhagwat SV, Ratzan WJ, Ostrowski MC, Shapiro LH. CD13/APN transcription is induced by RAS/MAPK-mediated phosphorylation of Ets-2 in activated endothelial Cells. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278: 49358–49368.
71. Brown C, Gaspar J, Pettit A, Lee R, Gu X, Wang H, Manning C, Voland C, Goldring SR, Goldring MB, Libermann TA, Gravallese EM, Oettgen P. ESE-1 is a novel transcriptional mediator of angiopoietin-1 expression in the setting of inflammation. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279: 12794–12803.
72. Zheng H, Wasylyk C, Ayadi A, Abecassis J, Schalken JA, Rogatsch H, Wernert N, Maira S-M, Multon M-C, Wasylyk B. The transcription factor Net regulates the angiogenic switch. Genes Dev. 2003; 17: 2283–2297.
73. Bi W, Drake CJ, Schwarz JJ. The transcription factor MEF2C-null mouse exhibits complex vascular malformations and reduced cardiac expression of angiopoietin 1 and VEGF. Dev Biol. 1999; 211: 255–267.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
74. Lin Q, Lu J, Yanagisawa H, Webb R, Lyons GE, Richardson JA, Olson EN. Requirement of the MADS-box transcription factor MEF2C for vascular development. Development. 1998; 125: 4565–4574.[Abstract]
75. Yang X, Castilla LH, Xu X, Li C, Gotay J, Weinstein M, Liu PP, Deng CX. Angiogenesis defects and mesenchymal apoptosis in mice lacking SMAD5. Development. 1999; 126: 1571–1580.[Abstract]
76. Schwarte-Waldhoff I, Volpert OV, Bouck NP, Sipos B, Hahn SA, Klein-Scory S, Luttges J, Kloppel G, Graeven U, Eilert-Micus C, Hintelmann A, Schmiegel W. Smad4/DPC4-mediated tumor suppression through suppression of angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97: 9624–9629.
77. Nakagawa T, Li JH, Garcia G, Mu W, Piek E, Bottinger EP, Chen Y, Zhu HJ, Kang DH, Schreiner GF, Lan HY, Johnson RJ. TGF-beta induces proangiogenic and antiangiogenic factors via parallel but distinct Smad pathways. Kidney Int. 2004; 66: 605–613.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
78. Sanchez-Elsner T, Botella LM, Velasco B, Corbi A, Attisano L, Bernabeu C. Synergistic cooperation between hypoxia and transforming growth factor-beta pathways on human vascular endothelial growth factor gene expression. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 38527–38535.
79. Darnell JE, Jr. STATs and gene regulation. Science. 1997; 277: 1630–1635.
80. Wei D, Le X, Zheng L, Wang L, Frey JA, Gao AC, Peng Z, Huang S, Xiong HQ, Abbruzzese JL, Xie K. Stat3 activation regulates the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and human pancreatic cancer angiogenesis and metastasis. Oncogene. 2003; 22: 319–329.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
81. Jung JE, Lee HG, Cho IH, Chung DH, Yoon SH, Yang YM, Lee JW, Choi S, Park JW, Ye SK, Chung MH. STAT3 is a potential modulator of HIF-1-mediated VEGF expression in human renal carcinoma cells. FASEB J. 2005; 19: 1296–1298.
82. Osugi T, Oshima Y, Fujio Y, Funamoto M, Yamashita A, Negoro S, Kunisada K, Izumi M, Nakaoka Y, Hirota H, Okabe M, Yamauchi-Takihara K, Kawase I, Kishimoto T. Cardiac-specific activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 promotes vascular formation in the heart. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277: 6676–6681.
83. Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Hilfiker A, Fuchs M, Kaminski K, Schaefer A, Schieffer B, Hillmer A, Schmiedl A, Ding Z, Podewski E, Poli V, Schneider MD, Schulz R, Park JK, Wollert KC, Drexler H. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 is required for myocardial capillary growth, control of interstitial matrix deposition, and heart protection from ischemic injury. Circ Res. 2004; 95: 187–195.
84. Xu Q, Briggs J, Park S, Niu G, Kortylewski M, Zhang S, Gritsko T, Turkson J, Kay H, Semenza GL, Cheng JQ, Jove R, Yu H. Targeting Stat3 blocks both HIF-1 and VEGF expression induced by multiple oncogenic growth signaling pathways. Oncogene. 2005; 24: 5552–5560.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
85. Graef IA, Chen F, Chen L, Kuo A, Crabtree GR. Signals transduced by Ca(2+)/calcineurin and NFATc3/c4 pattern the developing vasculature. Cell. 2001; 105: 863–875.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
86. Hernandez GL, Volpert OV, Iniguez MA, Lorenzo E, Martinez-Martinez S, Grau R, Fresno M, Redondo JM. Selective inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated angiogenesis by cyclosporin A: roles of the nuclear factor of activated T cells and cyclooxygenase 2. J Exp Med. 2001; 193: 607–620.
87. Armesilla AL, Lorenzo E, Gomez del Arco P, Martinez-Martinez S, Alfranca A, Redondo JM. Vascular endothelial growth factor activates nuclear factor of activated T cells in human endothelial cells: a role for tissue factor gene expression. Mol Cell Biol. 1999; 19: 2032–2043.
88. Zaichuk TA, Shroff EH, Emmanuel R, Filleur S, Nelius T, Volpert OV. Nuclear factor of activated T cells balances angiogenesis activation and inhibition. J Exp Med. 2004; 199: 1513–1522.
89. Okuda T, van Deursen J, Hiebert SW, Grosveld G, Downing JR. AML1, the target of multiple chromosomal translocations in human leukemia, is essential for normal fetal liver hematopoiesis. Cell. 1996; 84: 321–330.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
90. Komori T, Yagi H, Nomura S, Yamaguchi A, Sasaki K, Deguchi K, Shimizu Y, Bronson RT, Gao YH, Inada M, Sato M, Okamoto R, Kitamura Y, Yoshiki S, Kishimoto T. Targeted disruption of Cbfa1 results in a complete lack of bone formation owing to maturational arrest of osteoblasts. Cell. 1997; 89: 755–764.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
91. Otto F, Thornell AP, Crompton T, Denzel A, Gilmour KC, Rosewell IR, Stamp GW, Beddington RS, Mundlos S, Olsen BR, Selby PB, Owen MJ. Cbfa1, a candidate gene for cleidocranial dysplasia syndrome, is essential for osteoblast differentiation and bone development. Cell. 1997; 89: 765–771.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
92. Namba K, Abe M, Saito S, Satake M, Ohmoto T, Watanabe T, Sato Y. Indispensable role of the transcription factor PEBP2/CBF in angiogenic activity of a murine endothelial cell MSS31. Oncogene. 2000; 19: 106–114.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
93. Iwatsuki K, Tanaka K, Kaneko T, Kazama R, Okamoto S, Nakayama Y, Ito Y, Satake M, Takahashi S, Miyajima A, Watanabe T, Hara T. Runx1 promotes angiogenesis by downregulation of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3. Oncogene. 2005; 24: 1129–1137.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
94. Zelzer E, Glotzer DJ, Hartmann C, Thomas D, Fukai N, Soker S, Olsen BR. Tissue specific regulation of VEGF expression during bone development requires Cbfa1/Runx2. Mech Dev. 2001; 106: 97–106.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
95. Sun L, Vitolo M, Passaniti A. Runt-related gene 2 in endothelial cells: inducible expression and specific regulation of cell migration and invasion. Cancer Res. 2001; 61: 4994–5001.
96. Hosaka T, Biggs WH, 3rd, Tieu D, Boyer AD, Varki NM, Cavenee WK, Arden KC. Disruption of forkhead transcription factor (FOXO) family members in mice reveals their functional diversification. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101: 2975–2980.
97. Furuyama T, Kitayama K, Shimoda Y, Ogawa M, Sone K, Yoshida-Araki K, Hisatsune H, Nishikawa S, Nakayama K, Nakayama K, Ikeda K, Motoyama N, Mori N. Abnormal angiogenesis in Foxo1 (Fkhr)-deficient mice. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279: 34741–34749.
98. Potente M, Urbich C, Sasaki KI, Hofmann WK, Heeschen C, Aicher A, Kollipara R, Depinho RA, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Involvement of Foxo transcription factors in angiogenesis and postnatal neovascularization. J Clin Invest. 2005; 115: 2382–2392.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
99. Dijkers PF, Medema RH, Pals C, Banerji L, Thomas NS, Lam EW, Burgering BM, Raaijmakers JA, Lammers JW, Koenderman L, Coffer PJ. Forkhead transcription factor FKHR-L1 modulates cytokine-dependent transcriptional regulation of p27(KIP1). Mol Cell Biol. 2000; 20: 9138–9148.
100. Medema RH, Kops GJ, Bos JL, Burgering BM. AFX-like Forkhead transcription factors mediate cell-cycle regulation by Ras and PKB through p27kip1. Nature. 2000; 404: 782–787.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
101. Potente M, Fisslthaler B, Busse R, Fleming I. 11,12-Epoxyeicosatrienoic acid-induced inhibition of FOXO factors promotes endothelial proliferation by down-regulating p27Kip1. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278: 29619–29625.
102. Daly C, Wong V, Burova E, Wei Y, Zabski S, Griffiths J, Lai KM, Lin HC, Ioffe E, Yancopoulos GD, Rudge JS. Angiopoietin-1 modulates endothelial cell function and gene expression via the transcription factor FKHR (FOXO1). Genes Dev. 2004; 18: 1060–1071.
103. Tang TT, Lasky LA. The forkhead transcription factor FOXO4 induces the down-regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha by a von Hippel-Lindau protein-independent mechanism. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278: 30125–30135.
104. Kim MS, Kwon HJ, Lee YM, Baek JH, Jang JE, Lee SW, Moon EJ, Kim HS, Lee SK, Chung HY, Kim CW, Kim KW. Histone deacetylases induce angiogenesis by negative regulation of tumor suppressor genes. Nat Med. 2001; 7: 437–443.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
105. Huppert SS, Le A, Schroeter EH, Mumm JS, Saxena MT, Milner LA, Kopan R. Embryonic lethality in mice homozygous for a processing-deficient allele of Notch1. Nature. 2000; 405: 966–970.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
106. Liu Z-J, Shirakawa T, Li Y, Soma A, Oka M, Dotto GP, Fairman RM, Velazquez OC, Herlyn M. Regulation of Notch1 and Dll4 by Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Arterial Endothelial Cells: Implications for Modulating Arteriogenesis and Angiogenesis. Mol Cell Biol. 2003; 23: 14–25.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  J. Niu, A. Azfer, O. Zhelyabovska, S. Fatma, and P. E. Kolattukudy Monocyte Chemotactic Protein (MCP)-1 Promotes Angiogenesis via a Novel Transcription Factor, MCP-1-induced Protein (MCPIP) J. Biol. Chem., May 23, 2008; 283(21): 14542 - 14551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Doyle and N. Caplice Plaque Neovascularization and Antiangiogenic Therapy for Atherosclerosis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 29, 2007; 49(21): 2073 - 2080. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||