Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2006;26:1936-1947
Published online before print June 15, 2006,
doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000232542.42968.e3
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2006;26:1936.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Transcriptional Regulators of Angiogenesis
Anne Hamik;
Baiqiu Wang;
Mukesh K. Jain
From the Program in Cardiovascular Transcriptional Biology, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Correspondence to Mukesh K. Jain, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail mjain{at}rics.bwh.harvard.edu
Series Editor: Stephanie Dimmeler
Novel Mediators and Mechanisms in Angiogenesis and Vasculogenesis
ATVB In Focus
Previous Brief Reviews in this Series:
Ferguson JE III, Kelley RW, Patterson C. Mechanisms of endothelial differentiation in embryonic vasculogenesis. 2005;25:22452254.
Werner N, Nickenig G. Influence of cardiovascular risk factors on endothelial progenitor cells: limitations for therapy? 2006;26:257266.
van Hinsbergh VWM, Engelse MA, Quax PHA. Pericellular proteases in angiogenesis and vasculogenesis. 2006;26:716728.
Sata M. Role of circulating vascular progenitors in angiogenesis, vascular healing, and pulmonary hypertension: lessons from animal models. 2006;26:10081014.
Liebner S, Cavallaro U, Dejana E. The multiple languages of endothelial cell-to-cell communication. 2006;26:14311438.
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
Angiogenesis, the process by which new blood vessels develop
from a pre-existing vascular network, is essential for normal
development and in certain physiological states. Inadequate
or excessive angiogenesis has been incriminated in a number
of pathologic states. For example, vaso-occlusive disease arising
from atherosclerosis can lead to ischemia, a situation in which
enhanced angiogenesis would be beneficial. Conversely, overzealous
angiogenesis can contribute to tumor development and in this
case inhibition of angiogenesis is desirable. Thus, strategies
to induce or inhibit angiogenesis are of considerable therapeutic
interest.
Angiogenesis is essential for normal development and homeostasis. Inadequate angiogenesis results in ischemia whereas overzealous angiogenesis can contribute to tumor development. In recent years, several transcription factors have been identified as directors of the angiogenic process. These factors and the mechanisms by whidch they exert their effects are reviewed.
Key Words: angiogenesis endothelium transcription gene regulation
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
The angiogenic process is regulated by a wide array of growth
factors and signaling pathways. Ultimately, many of these mechanisms
converge on nuclear events that regulate cellular gene expression.
In this review we focus on a number of transcriptional pathways
that have recently been implicated in angiogenesis. In the text
and in the
Table
, we have grouped specific molecules by the
transcription factor class to which they belong. In the
Figure,
these factors are grouped according to cellular function. Because
of space limitations we have excluded factors for which direct
evidence (in vitro or in vivo) is lacking even if there is correlative
evidence available. Furthermore, we will not discuss certain
established pathways, such as hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1

),
that have been the subject of numerous reviews.

View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Schematic illustrating the site of cellular functions and pathways regulated by transcription factors recently described to be active in angiogenesis. Transcription factors listed on the right have been shown to regulate or be regulated by the molecules, signaling pathways, or structures included in each titled subsection. Directionality of effect is indicated by the arrows; for example, the RAS pathway regulates Net, and HDACs regulate HIF-1 degradation. Each subsection is illustrated graphically in the portion of the figure directly to its left.
|
|
 |
Zinc-Finger Proteins
|
|---|
Zinc-finger proteins (ZnF) constitute one of the most abundant
classes of DNA binding proteins. The coordination of cysteine
(C) and/or histidine (H) residues around a zinc ion forms an
independent domain that protrudes as a finger-like projection.
The number and spacing of these cysteine and/or histidine residues
account for the different subclasses of ZnF proteins. Most DNA-binding
ZnF proteins contain

3 fingers that contact DNA in the major
groove.
Kruppel-Like Factors
Kruppel-like factors (KLF) are C2H2 zinc-finger proteins implicated in aspects of cellular growth and differentiation. KLF2 (Lung-Kruppel-like factor) was originally identified by Lingrel et al.1 KLF2 is induced by laminar flow, an important stimulus for endothelial differentiation and vascular remodeling.2 As such, it was not surprising that KLF2-null mice exhibited vascular defects. Targeting of this factor in mice has revealed important roles for KLF2 in multiple cell types including endothelial cells. Specifically, KLF2-deficient mice die in mid-gestation because of leaky blood vessels.3 More recently, studies from our laboratory show that adenoviral overexpression of KLF2 potently abrogates vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-mediated angiogenesis as well as tissue edema.4 This potent inhibitory effect appears to be caused, at least in part, by a reduction in expression of the key VEGF receptor VEGFR2.4 In addition, Dekker et al have also shown that KLF2 induces the potent anti-migratory factor SEMA3F that may also contribute to its anti-angiogenic effects.5 Studies from the laboratory of R. Nagai implicate a second KLF family member in regulating angiogenesis. KLF5 is expressed in activated endothelial cells and studies using KLF5+/ mice demonstrate impaired angiogenic activity in models of hind-limb ischemia and tumor implantation.6 Taken together these studies support an important role for KLFs in angiogenesis.
Vascular Endothelial Zinc Finger 1
Using a retroviral entrapment genetic screening strategy, Stuhlman et al identified vascular endothelial zinc finger protein 1 (Vezf1) on the basis of its endothelial restricted expression in the developing embryo.7 Vezf1 contains 6 C2H2 zinc fingers, is expressed at sites of postnatal angiogenesis, and can regulate endothelial gene products such as endothelin-1.8 Downregulation of Vezf1 expression in endothelial cells impairs proliferation, migration, and network formation.9 These data suggest that Vezf1 may normally function to promote aspects of angiogenesis.
Early Growth Response Factor 1
Early growth response factor 1 (Egr-1) is a broadly expressed C2H2 zinc-finger protein first discovered as an immediate early gene induced by serum. Egr-1 can induce a broad spectrum of growth factors, cytokines, receptors, adhesion molecules, and proteases implicated in angiogenesis. Using an RNA-cleaving phosphodiester-linked DNA-based enzyme approach to eliminate Egr-1 expression, Khachigian et al demonstrated a reduction in endothelial cell replication, migration, tubule formation, and fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-dependent angiogenesis.10 Consistent data were obtained when an inhibitor of Egr-1, Nab2, was shown to inhibit angiogenesis in vitro.11
 |
Basic Helix-Loop-Helix
|
|---|
Members of the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) family of transcriptional
factors share a common sequence motif of a stretch of basic
amino acids responsible for site-specific DNA binding adjacent
to a helix-loop-helix domain. bHLH proteins play important roles
in regulating gene expression by forming homodimers and heterodimers
that bind to a 6-basepair DNA site with the consensus sequence
CANNTG.
Inhibition of DNA Binding/Inhibitor of Cell Differentiation
Inhibition of DNA binding/inhibitor of cell differentiation (Id) proteins contain the helix-loop-helix that allows for heterodimerization with other members of this family but lack a DNA binding domain. As a consequence, Id proteins form inactive heterodimers with other bHLH factors and function in a dominant-negative fashion. The Id protein family is comprised of 4 members designated Id1, Id2, Id3, and Id4. They are widely expressed during development and are responsible for regulation of a variety of cellular processes including cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis.12 With respect to angiogenesis, Id1 and Id3 appear to be particularly important. Double-knockout mice (Id1/Id3/) are not viable and exhibit defects in neural differentiation and angiogenesis but not vasculogenesis. Furthermore, although mice with targeted disruption of Id1, Id2, or Id3 are viable, they exhibit a marked reduction in tumor angiogenesis and metastasis.13 The basis for these effects may be multifactorial as Id proteins have been shown to regulate the expression of multiple factors implicated in angiogenesis such as VEGF and its receptor VEGFR2,1315
6 integrin, ß4 integrin, FGF receptor 1, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2, and thrombospondin (TSP-1).16,17
Stem Cell Leukemia/T-Cell Acute Leukemia-1
Stem cell leukemia (SCL) was originally identified as an oncogene in human T-cell leukemia.18 Gene-targeting studies showed SCL was essential for both normal yolk sac angiogenesis19 and adult hematopoiesis.20,21 In adult animals, SCL expression in nonhematopoietic cells is limited to endothelial cells lining new blood vessels.22,23 Furthermore, consistent with this observation, SCL expression is robust in endothelial cells of tumor vasculature but not in mature quiescent vasculature.24 Ectopic expression of SCL augmented endothelial cell chemotactic migration and accelerated capillary formation in vitro and in vivo.25
Heart and Neural Crest Derivatives
The heart and neural crest derivative (HAND) subfamily of bHLH proteins comprises 2 members: HAND 1 (eHAND, Hxt, Thing1) and HAND2 (dHAND, Hed, Thing2). Originally identified by protein interaction screens,26,27 HAND gene expression is restricted to heart, lateral mesoderm and neural crest derivatives. In addition, HAND1 is expressed in extra-embryonic membranes, whereas HAND2 is uniquely expressed within the maternal deciduum.2628 Knockout analysis of HAND1 and HAND2 in mouse model resulted in embryonic lethality. Although vasculogenesis was unaltered in HAND1/ yolk sacs, vascular refinement and smooth muscle cell recruitment was disrupted.29 In HAND2-null mice, endothelial differentiation was unaltered; however, endothelial cell patterning and smooth muscle cell differentiation were disrupted leading to abnormal vascular development.30 These studies implicate HAND factors as essential for embryonic vessel development. The role of these factors in adult angiogenesis remains to be elucidated.
Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Proteins
Sterol regulatory element binding proteins (SREBPs) are endoplasmic reticulum-bound transcription factors that are critical regulators of cellular cholesterol synthesis. In sterol-loaded cells SREPBs bind to and are inactivated by SREBP cleavage activating protein (SCAP). When sterol levels drop, SCAP transports SREBPs to the Golgi where they are cleaved, allowing nuclear translocation of the N-terminal end and transactivation of genes such as receptor, hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A (CoA) (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl [HMG] CoA) reductase and fatty acid synthase. Previous studies have shown that VEGF and bFGF modulate the microviscosity of the plasma membrane as part of their pro-angiogenic effect. VEGF activates SREBP1 and SREBP2 in endothelial cell in a SCAP- and Akt-dependent manner.31 Inhibition of SCAP blocks VEGF-induced pseudopodia extension and migration. Thus, SREBPs may influence angiogenesis via an initial step in the migration of endothelial cells.
Transcription Factor II-I
Transcription factor II-I (TFII-I) is a ubiquitously expressed basal transcription factor activated in response to a number of extracellular signals and functions through a core promoter site termed an initiator element (Inr). Wu and Patterson32 identified TFII-1 as capable of binding to a site within the basal promoter of the VEGFR2 (KDR/Flk-1) gene and regulating transcriptional activity in vitro and in vivo. More recently, Jackson et al33 extended these observations to show that TFII-1 can act at both basal and regulatory sites within the VEGFR2 promoter and that small inhibitory RNA (siRNA)-mediated knockdown of TFII-1 reduced VEGFR2 expression. Given the central importance of VEGFR2, these studies support a role for TFII-1 in angiogenesis. However, in vivo studies to date have been lacking.
 |
Hey Factors
|
|---|
The Hey family of factors (Hey 1, Hey2, HeyL) are key effectors
of the Notch signaling pathway and critical regulators of cardiovascular
development. With respect to vessel biology, these factors have
been implicated in regulating vascular development and angiogenesis.
In vitro, Hey 1 has been shown to regulate endothelial proliferation,
migration, and tube formation.
34 Surprisingly, targeting of
Hey1 did not reveal any overt vascular phenotype. However, the
combined loss of Hey1 and Hey2 was lethal with global lack of
vascular remodeling and impaired arterial fate determination
and maturation.
35 Together, these finding suggest an important
role of Hey proteins in angiogenesis.
 |
Basic Leucine Zipper Protein
|
|---|
Basic leucine zipper (bZIP) proteins contain 4 or 5 leucine
residues spaced at intervals of seven amino acids, resulting
in their hydrophobic side chains being exposed at one side of
a helical region. Like bHLH, many bZIP transcription factors
exert their functions by forming heterodimers of 2 different
polypeptide chains, each containing one bZIP domain. Some members
of this family of transcriptional regulators have been implicated
to play a role in angiogenesis.
cAMP Response Element-Binding Proteins
The cAMP response element-binding (CREB) proteins are key transcriptional mediators of stimulus-induced nuclear responses that underlie the development and function of diverse cell types. The CREB family consists of CREB and two closely related factors termed CREM and ATF1. Several lines of evidence implicate CREB in angiogenesis. For example, CREB regulates the expression of a number of genes induced by hypoxia such as VEGF.36 CREB binding has been implicated in the regulation of 2 key VEGF receptors, VEGFR1 (Flt1)37 and VEGFR2 (Flk). Furthermore, VEGF binding to its cognate receptor VEGFR2 induced CREB phosphorylation at serine 133, and increased DNA-binding and transcriptional activity. Furthermore, overexpression of a constitutively active form of CREB enhanced tumor angiogenesis.
Activator Protein-1
Activator protein-1 (AP-1) transcription factors are dimers of proteins encoded by Jun (c-Jun, JunB, JunD), Fos (c-Fos, Fra-1, Fra-2, and FosB), and ATFs. Dimers formed between ATF and Jun preferentially bind to cAMP-responsive elements. Jun homodimers or the more stable Jun-Fos heterodimers regulate a large variety of biological processes including cell differentiation, proliferation, apoptosis, and oncogenic transformation. Targeting of c-Jun, JunB, Fra-1, and Fra-2 results in embryonic or early postnatal death. With respect to angiogenesis, several family members have been shown to regulate gene products implicated in angiogenesis. For example, c-Fos induces VEGF-D;38 Fra-1 induces urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), uPA receptor (uPAR) and various matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs),39,40 and c-Jun/JunB induces proliferin.41 In vivo evidence supporting a role has been more challenging given that, as noted, knockout of several family members results in nonviable animals. However, examination of the Fra-1-null embryos revealed evidence for inadequate placental vascularization suggesting that this factor promotes vessel development.42 In the case of JunD, animals are viable and thus amenable to further study. In the context of cancer biology recent studies show that JunD reduces tumor angiogenesis by limiting Ras-mediated production of reactive oxygen species.43 Furthermore, JunD-null mice exhibit higher cardiac capillary density and increased VEGF levels along with enhanced cardiomyocyte apoptosis in response to pressure overload.44 Taken together, these data suggest that members of the AP-1 family can differentially regulate angiogenesis.
 |
Nuclear Receptors
|
|---|
Chicken Ovalbumin Upstream Promoter-Transcription Factor II
Chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factors (COUPTF)
are orphan members of the steroid/thyroid hormone superfamily.
COUP-TFII-null mice die as embryos from defects in angiogenesis
and heart development.
45 These mice show decreased expression
of angiopoietin-1 (ang-1) and defective remodeling of the primitive
capillary plexus into large and small microcapillaries, a pattern
suggesting disrupted mesenchymal-endothelial interactions. COUP-TFII
and ets-1 are colocalized in mesenchymal cells during embryogenesis,
and ets-1 can transactivate a COUP-TFII construct in transient
transfections.
46 COUP-TFII can confer an invasive phenotype
to human lung carcinoma cell lines by inducing MMP-2 and uPA/uPAR,
47 reminiscent of similar modulation of MMP-2 and uPA seen during
angiogenesis.
Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptors
Peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) are ligand-activated nuclear receptors that have well-established pleiotropic roles in cell metabolism and tend to confer anti-proliferative and pro-differentiation properties. The 3 isoforms, PPAR
, PPAR
, and PPARß/
, are all receptors for the class of synthetic ligands called thiazolidinediones well as for natural ligands, the most widely studied of which is the prostaglandin 15 deoxy-PGJ2. The effects of PPARs on angiogenesis have been subject to an excellent recent review48 and readers are referred thereto for comprehensive references. Briefly, PPAR
is expressed in endothelial cells and inhibits angiogenesis at multiple steps. Activation by ligand decreases tube formation, the proliferative response to VEGF, bFGF, and phorbol myristate acetate, and angiogenesis in the rat cornea.49,50 PPAR
ligands also inhibit leptin-induced Akt-mediated endothelial cell migration.51 Importantly, PPAR activation can inhibit inflammation-independent angiogenesis such as in the chicken chorioallantoic membrane as well as angiogenesis induced by the inflammatory mediators ELR+ and CXC chemokines IL-8, ENA-78 and Gro-a in tumors.52
 |
Helix-Turn-Helix
|
|---|
Homeobox Factors
The homeobox (HOX) family members contain a helix-turn-helix
DNA-binding homeodomain and have critical roles in pattern formation
and organogenesis, where they regulate cell differentiation,
proliferation, and migration. More recently, they have been
shown to regulate these same processes during adult neovascularization.
53 Ex vivo models of adult neovascularization indicate that HOX
gene products have both complementary and antagonistic functions.
For example, HOXD3 increases the invasive and migratory behavior
of the transformed cell line HMEC-1, whereas its paralog HOXB3
enhances subsequent capillary morphogenesis.
54 However, HOXD10,
GAX and HEX have effects that are nonangiogenic.
5557 Interestingly, much of the data available thus far indicate
that the mechanism of function for these transcription factors
is via regulation of genes that contribute to remodeling of
the extracellular matrix, rather than a direct effect on endothelial
cell proliferation. Thus, HOXD3 upregulates

vß3 integrin
and collagen 1,
58,59 and HOXA3 increases, whereas HOXD10 decreases,
MMP-14 and uPAR expression.
55,60 A growth factor-independent
function of HOXD3 is suggested by a study demonstrating up-regulation
of HOXD3 as a result of the binding of the extracellular protein
Del-1 to integrin

vß5.
61 More traditional angiogenic
targets have also been highlighted in studies of HOXA9, whose
pro-angiogenic effects are mediated at least in part via direct
effects on the up-regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase
(eNOS) and VEGFR2
62 and downregulation of ephrin B4.
63
E26 Transformation Specific
The E26 transformation specific (ETS) family of transcription factors is characterized by a conserved winged helix-turn-helix structural motif that serves as the DNA-binding domain. In the early 1990s, ets-1 was the first member of this family to be recognized as a critical factor in vascular development and angiogenesis. The characterization of ets-1 and early information about other members of this family has been summarized in a review by Sato.64 Since that time, ets-1 has been shown to be a potent stimulator of angiogenesis in vivo65 and to be negatively regulated by SP100.66 Additional members of the ETS family have since been identified as regulators of angiogenesis. For example, novel ets transcriptional factor 2 (NERF2) is highly expressed in endothelial cells and upregulates the expression of Tie2 (the ang-1 receptor), an effect that may be most important under hypoxic conditions.67 Elf-1 is expressed in a subset of endothelial cells and can transactivate both the Tie1 and Tie2 promoters68 as well as the angiopoietin-2 (ang-2) promoter.69 Ras/MAPK-dependent phosphorylation of Ets-2 was demonstrated to be required for tubule formation by transformed EC lines and able to transactivate the CD13/APN promoter, a metallopeptidase with angiogenic properties.70 ESE-1 expression is induced in endothelial cells in response to inflammatory mediators where it then mediates transcription of ang-1.71 This is particularly interesting as ang-1, although known to be induced under inflammatory conditions, does not have obvious binding sites for the traditional mediators of inflammation including NF-kB, STAT, NFAT, or C/EPB. Finally, downregulation of Net (Elk-3/Sap-2/ERP) has been demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo to inhibit angiogenesis and VEGF expression. Net is converted from a transcriptional repressor to a transcriptional activator via the Ras/MAPK pathway.72
 |
MADS-Box Factors
|
|---|
Myocyte enhancer factor-2 (MEF2) proteins comprise a subfamily
of the MADS (MCM1, agamous, deficiens, serum response factor)-box
factors and are best known as critical regulators of muscle
development and differentiation. Four MEF2 factorsMEF2A,
MEF2B, MEF2C, and MEF2Dhave been identified to date.
MEF2C is expressed in developing endothelial cells, smooth muscle
cells, and surrounding mesenchyme during embryogenesis.
73 Mice
carrying a mutant MEF2C gene die early during embryogenesis
and exhibit multiple vascular defects including the failure
of endothelial cells to organize into complex vascular structures
and inadequate smooth muscle cell differentiation.
73,74 Information
regarding the role of this family of factors in adult angiogenesis
is lacking.
 |
Smad Family
|
|---|
The founding member of the Smad family was first identified
as the product of
drosophila gene
mothers against decapentaplegic (MAD). This discovery led to the identification of Mad-related
gene products, referred to as Smads in nematodes and vertebrates.
Smad proteins are a component of the transforming growth factor
ß (TGFß) signaling pathway and function
downstream of the TGFß receptor to directly transduce
signals from the cell membrane into the nucleus. There are 9
vertebrate Smads: pathway-specific Smads1, 2, 3, 5, and 8 and
MADH6; the common mediator Smad4; and the inhibitory Smads 6
and 7. Smad2 and 3 act as the downstream mediators of TGFß
and activin receptors, whereas Smad1 and 5 respond to bone morphogenetic
protein (BMP) signals. Because TGFß has been shown
to have both pro-angiogenic and anti-angiogenic effects depending
on the status of the cell, it is conceivable that Smad proteins
are important transcriptional factors that mediate those effects.
Studies of Smad5-null embryos revealed obvious defects in angiogenesis.
75 At E9.0, the yolk sacs of Smad5-null mice lacked a well-organized
yolk sac vasculature, a defect that may be caused by a failure
of communication between endothelium and mesenchyme during angiogenesis.
Smad4, the only Smad protein involved in signaling pathways
of all members of the TGFß superfamily, has a central
role in mediating TGFß effects. It was originally
identified as a tumor suppressor gene DPC4 (deleted in pancreatic
carcinoma). In fact, the most potent mechanism underlying Smad4-mediated
tumor suppression is via inhibition of angiogenesis,
76 which
involves both downregulation of VEGF and upregulation of TSP-1.
Smad3 is becoming recognized as a pro-angiogenic factor due
to the fact that it mediates TGFß1-stimulated VEGF-A
expression.
77,78 In contrast, Smad2 has been implicated in promoting
the production of anti-angiogenic factors such as TSP-1 and
the soluble VEGF-A receptor Flt-1(sVEGFR1).
77 Together, these
results demonstrate that Smad proteins play distinct and opposing
roles in regulating expression of angiogenic factors.
 |
Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription
|
|---|
The signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)
factor are a family of transcription factors that are activated
by cytokines, growth factors, and hormones. Seven family members
have been identified and shown to play crucial roles in different
physiological processes such as cellular differentiation, proliferation,
apoptosis, and angiogenesis.
79 Among this family, STAT3 has
emerged as particularly important in the context of angiogenesis.
STAT3 is a direct transcriptional activator of HIF-1 and VEGF
in a broad range of human cancers.
80,81 Transgenic overexpression
of STAT3 in the heart resulted in increased VEGF expression
and capillary density.
82 Conversely, cardiomyocyte-restricted
deletion of STAT3 resulted in reduced myocardial capillary density.
83 Consistent with these observations, targeting of STAT3 with
a small-molecule inhibitor blocked HIF-1/VEGF expression in
vitro and tumor angiogenesis in vivo.
84 These studies established
an essential role of Stat3 in controlling cardiac capillary
vasculature.
 |
The Nuclear Factor of Activated T Cells
|
|---|
Members of the nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) family
of transcriptional factors normally reside in the cytoplasm
and on stimulation translocate to the nucleus to affect cellular
gene expression. Four main family members have been identified
to date termed NFATc (NFAT2/NFATc1), NFATp (NFAT1/NFATc2), NFAT3
(NFATc4), and NFAT4 (NFATc3). Studies to date implicate several
members in embryonic and adult angiogenesis. While targeting
of NFATc3 and c4 revealed viable animals, the double-knockout
results in embryonic death.
85 Examination of the NFATc3/4-null
mice demonstrated disorganized major vessels including the intersomitic
vessels, branchial arch arteries, and cranial vessels. No defect
was observed in the differentiation and proliferation of mutant
endothelial cells. However, null embryos exhibited reduced association
of smooth muscle cells and pericytes indicating that NFATc3/4
are required for recruitment of these cells to the vessel wall.
In the adult vasculature, NFAT1 is the dominant form expressed.
NFAT1 is activated by pro-angiogenic factors such as VEGF/bFGF
and inhibited by anti-angiogenic molecules such as pigment epithelial-derived
factor (PEDF). NFAT1 activation has been shown to increase pro-angiogenic/pro-inflammatory
factors such as tissue factor and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2).
86,87 Furthermore, VEGF-induced NFAT directly upregulates expression
of the caspase-8 inhibitor cellular Fas-associated death domain-like
IL1ß-converting enzyme inhibitory protein (c-FLIP),
which mediates resistance to apoptotic signaling.
88 Finally,
a mechanistic rationale for the potential importance of the
NFAT pathway in the angiogenesis seen in diseases such as rheumatoid
arthritis is supported by the observation that treatment of
endothelial cells with the immunosuppressive drug cyclosporine
prevents VEGF-mediated angiogenesis at least in part by inhibiting
the NFAT-dependent upregulation of COX-2.
86 Taken together these
studies implicate the NFAT family as critical regulators of
embryonic and adult angiogenesis.
 |
Runt Domain Factors
|
|---|
The RUNX transcription factors are members of the Ig-loop DNA-binding
family of proteins that contain a conserved Runt-homology domain.
The group consists of at least 3 phosphorylated

subunits which
have several alternative names abbreviated from the core "runt-related
gene/core binding factor/acute myeloid leukemia/polyoma enhancer-binding
protein 2," ie, RUNX1/Cbf

2/AML1/PEBP2

B, RUNX2/Cbf

1/AML3/PEBP2

A,
and RUNX3/Cbf

3/AML2/PEBP2

C. Each of these heterodimerizes with
a single ß subunit, Cbfß. Mice deficient
in either RUNX1 or RUNX2 die as embryos or soon after birth
with a defect in definitive hematopoiesis (RUNX1)
89 or ossification
(RUNX2).
90,91 RUNX1 is expressed in endothelial cell lines and
at sites of angiogenesis in vivo and is induced by bFGF and
VEGF. A dominant-negative construct impairs endothelial cell
proliferation, migration, and tube formation,
92 whereas overexpression
of RUNX1 in endothelial progenitors leads to enhanced expression
of vascular endothelial cadherin (VE-cadherin) and the formation
of vascular networks, demonstrating a role in endothelial cell
differentiation and maturation.
93 Interestingly, in RUNX2-deficient
mice, although there is normal vascularity of the perichondrium
and surrounding tissue, there is a lack of blood vessel invasion
into areas of hypertrophied chondrocytes, a process required
for the transformation of cartilage to bone.
94 In human bone
marrow endothelial cells, a dominant-negative RUNX2 causes decreased
endothelial cell differentiation and impairs growth arrest.
95
 |
Forkhead Factors
|
|---|
The FOXO subclass of forkhead transcription factors (FKHR/FOXO1,
FKHRL1/FOXO3a, AFX/FOXO4) has been shown to have roles in stress
responses, control of cell cycle, and apoptosis. Recent studies
also implicate this family of factors in angiogenesis. FOXO1-null
mice die on embryonic day 10 to 11 with defects in vasculogenesis
and angiogenesis.
96,97 Histological analyses revealed defects
in the dorsal aorta, hypoplastic branchial arches, and absence
of distinct yolk sac blood vessels. FOXO3a-null mice demonstrated
only abnormalities of ovarian follicular development, and FOXO4-null
mice had no obvious phenotype.
96 However, both FOXO1 and FOXO3a
have been shown to regulate postnatal neovascularization.
98 Overexpression of either of these transcription factors inhibited
endothelial cell migration and tube formation in vitro, and
knockdown significantly increased migration and sprout formation.
Both FOXO1 and FOXO3a bind to and transrepress the eNOS promoter.
eNOS is essential for postnatal neovascularization, and FOXO3a-null
mice reflect this by demonstrating increased eNOS expression
and postnatal neovascularization.
Regulation of the cell cycle by FOXO1 and FOXO4 is mediated by FOXO-dependent induction of expression of p27KIP1, which causes growth suppression and increased endothelial cell apoptosis.99,100 Akt-dependent phosphorylation of FOXO proteins leads to sequestration in the cytoplasm and, thus, inactivation. This mechanism has been demonstrated after cytokine induction of the PI3K/Akt pathway,99 with treatment of endothelial cells with epoxyeicosatrienoic acid101 and after addition of ang-1.102 By activating Akt, ang-1 blocks FOXO1-induced apoptosis and FOXO1-mediated gene expression. Furthermore, microarray analysis of endothelial cells over-expressing FOXO1 shows enhanced expression of genes associated with vascular destabilization and remodeling. Finally, in Tet-on HeLa cells, FOXO4 inhibits hypoxia-induced HIF-1
by mediating proteosomal degradation of HIF-1
by a mechanism different from the previously described von Hippel Lindau-dependent ubiquitin-mediated process.103 This may represent a novel mechanism for hypoxic regulation. However, endogenous FOXO4 has not been demonstrated in endothelial cells,101 nor does exogenous expression have an effect on neovascularization.98
 |
Histone Deacetylases
|
|---|
Histone deacetylases (HDACs) modulate chromatin structure and
associate with transcription factors involved in repressing
gene expression. A function in angiogenesis is suggested by
the fact that HDAC1 is induced by hypoxia in multiple cell types.
Overexpression of HDAC1 downregulated p53 and von Hippel-Lindau
tumor suppressor genes and stimulated angiogenesis in human
endothelial cells.
104 Inhibition of HDAC1 upregulated the aforementioned
genes and also inhibited HIF-1

and VEGF expression. Thus HDAC1
may regulate hypoxia-mediated angiogenesis.
 |
Notch
|
|---|
Notch family receptors are associated with the plasma membrane
and are cleaved on activation by ligand binding. The intracellular
domain of the receptor then translocates into the nucleus and
acts as a transcriptional coactivator. Members of the Notch
family are expressed in the endothelium and targeted mutations
of many, including Notch1,
105 result in vascular defects. VEGF,
but not bFGF, induces Notch1 and its ligand Dll4 in human arterial
endothelial cells (but not in human umbilical vein endothelial
cells) via activation of Akt.
106 Constitutive activation of
Notch1 enhances formation of arterial endothelial cell tubule
formation. Thus Notch1/Dll4 may have a particularly important
role in arteriogenesis.
 |
Summary
|
|---|
As reviewed, the past few years have witnessed the identification
of many transcriptional regulators of angiogenesis. Although
these studies have provided novel scientific information, much
remains to be done. Several key questions are: (1) precisely
which step(s) in the angiogenic process does each factor affect?;
(2) can this effect be verified in more than one model of angiogenesis
in vivo?; (3) are the observed effects of a factor critical
during embryonic angiogenesis, adult angiogenesis, or both?;
(4) does the specific transcription factor cooperate with others
to exact its angiogenic effects?; and (5) can the expression/function
of a specific transcription factor be altered in a therapeutically
beneficial manner?
Angiogenesis is a complex multistep process that involves degradation of the extracellular matrix, endothelial cell migration and proliferation, tube formation, and vessel maturation with investment of pericytes and/or smooth muscle cells. Studies on a specific factor have, to date, often focused on a single or very restricted number of steps in this process. Furthermore, many studies have been limited to in vitro assays. Moving forward, it will be critical that more detailed studies for each individual factor be undertaken in order to gain a more comprehensive understanding of its role in the angiogenic process. Additionally, studies should be extended to at least one (and preferably more than one) in vivo model of angiogenesis. This is an important point as the milieu of tumor angiogenesis may be quite different than that seen, for example, during embryogenesis or in response to a specific stimulus (eg, specific growth factor or cytokine).
Transcription factors clearly do not function in a vacuum. Interaction and cooperation with other transcriptional regulators, components of the general transcriptional machinery, and chromatin-modifying factors can have profound cellular effects. An understanding of the transcriptional hierarchy and network is critical to gaining a more complete understanding of how specific factors regulate the complex angiogenic process.
Finally, identification of novel transcriptional pathways that regulate angiogenesis offers, in principal, the foundation for novel therapeutic strategies. Traditionally, transcription factors have not served as attractive targets. However, the nuclear receptor family (eg, PPARs) is a notable exception. These factors are activated in the cytoplasm by ligand binding, with subsequent translocation to the nucleus to affect gene expression. Of particular interest is that potential PPAR ligands include currently prescribed oral medications. In the same vein, recent studies demonstrate that KLF2 expression can be induced by statins. Given that both high doses of statins and KLF2 can inhibit angiogenesis, this raises the interesting possibility that some of the anti-angiogenic properties of statins may be, in part, KLF2 dependent. If so, a rationale would be provided to explore the Kruppel-like factors as targets for pharmaceutical agents aimed to inhibit angiogenesis.
 |
Acknowledgments
|
|---|
Sources of Funding
This work was partly supported by National Institutes of Health grants HL69477 (M.K.J.), HL72952 (M.K.J.), HL75427 (M.K.J.), HL76754 (M.K.J.), P01 HL48743 (M.K.J.), T32 HOLO 760420 (A.H.), and the Alliance for Cancer Gene Therapy (M.K.J.).
Disclosures
None.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
Original received November 3, 2005; final version accepted June
2, 2006.
 |
References
|
|---|
- Anderson KP, Kern CB, Crable SC, Lingrel JB. Isolation of a gene encoding a functional zinc finger protein homologous to erythroid Kruppel-like factor: identification of a new multigene family. Molecular & Cellular Biology. 1995; 15: 59575965.[Abstract]
- Dekker RJ, van Soest S, Fontijn RD, Salamanca S, de Groot PG, VanBavel E, Pannekoek H, Horrevoets AJ. Prolonged fluid shear stress induces a distinct set of endothelial cell genes, most specifically lung Kruppel-like factor (KLF2). Blood. 2002; 100: 16891698.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kuo CT, Veselits ML, Barton KP, Lu MM, Clendenin C, Leiden JM. The LKLF transcription factor is required for normal tunica media formation and blood vessel stabilization during murine embryogenesis. Genes Dev. 1997; 11: 29963006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Bhattacharya R, Senbanerjee S, Lin Z, Mir S, Hamik A, Wang P, Mukherjee P, Mukhopadhyay D, Jain MK. Inhibition of vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated angiogenesis by the Kruppel-like factor KLF2. J Biol Chem. 2005; 280: 2884828851.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Dekker RJ, Boon RA, Rondaij MG, Kragt A, Volger OL, Elderkamp YW, Meijers JC,