Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2006;26:845-850
Published online before print January 12, 2006, doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000203511.66681.7f
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
26/4/845    most recent
01.ATV.0000203511.66681.7fv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meisner, F.
Right arrow Articles by Marx, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meisner, F.
Right arrow Articles by Marx, N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other diabetes
Right arrow Other Treatment
Right arrow Other Vascular biology
Right arrow Pathophysiology
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2006;26:845.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.


Vascular Biology

Effect of Rosiglitazone Treatment on Plaque Inflammation and Collagen Content in Nondiabetic Patients

Data From a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial

Franz Meisner; Daniel Walcher; Florence Gizard; Xaver Kapfer; Roman Huber; Anja Noak; Ludger Sunder-Plassmann; Helga Bach; Cornelia Haug; Max Bachem; Tatjana Stojakovic; Winfried März; Vinzenz Hombach; Wolfgang Koenig; Bart Staels; Nikolaus Marx

From the Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery (F.M., X.K., L.S.-P.), University of Ulm, Germany; Department of Internal Medicine II—Cardiology (D.W., A.N., H.B., V.H., W.K., N.M.), University of Ulm, Germany; UR545 INSERM (F.G., B.S.), Départment d’Athérosclérose, Université de Lille, France; 4Department of Neurology (R.H.), University of Ulm, Germany; Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.H., M.B.), University of Ulm, Germany; and Clinical Institute of Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics (T.S., W.M.), Medical University Graz, Austria.

Correspondence to Nikolaus Marx, MD, Department of Internal Medicine II–Cardiology, University of Ulm, Robert-Koch-Str. 8, D-89081 Ulm, Germany. E-mail nikolaus.marx{at}medizin.uni-ulm.de


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Therapeutic strategies to stabilize advanced arteriosclerotic lesions may prevent plaque rupture and reduce the incidence of acute coronary syndromes. Thiazolidinediones (TZDs), like rosiglitazone, are oral antidiabetic drugs with additional antiinflammatory and potential antiatherogenic properties. In a randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind trial, we examined the effect of 4 weeks of rosiglitazone therapy on histomorphological characteristics of plaque stability in artery specimen of nondiabetic patients scheduled for elective carotid endarterectomy.

Methods and Results— A total of 24 nondiabetic patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis were randomly assigned to rosiglitazone (4 mg BID) or placebo in addition to standard therapy. In this population of nondiabetic patients, rosiglitazone treatment did not significantly change fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin, or lipid parameters. In contrast, rosiglitazone significantly reduced CD4-lymphocyte content as well as macrophage HLA-DR expression in the shoulder region, reflecting less inflammatory activation of these cells by lymphocyte interferon-{gamma}. Moreover, rosiglitazone significantly increased plaque collagen content (7.7±1.6% versus 3.7±0.7% of plaque area; P=0.036) compared with placebo, suggesting that TZD treatment may stabilize arteriosclerotic lesions. In addition, rosiglitazone reduced serum levels of 2 inflammatory arteriosclerosis markers: C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A.

Conclusions— Four weeks of treatment with rosiglitazone significantly reduces vascular inflammation in nondiabetic patients, leading to a more stable type of arteriosclerotic lesion.

The present randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind trial demonstrates in nondiabetic patients scheduled for carotid endarterectomy that 4 weeks of treatment with rosiglitazone significantly reduces vascular inflammation, leading to a more stable type of arteriosclerotic lesion.


Key Words: plaque • thiazolidinediones • inflammation • collagen • diabetes


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Rupture or fissuring of advanced arteriosclerotic lesions with subsequent formation of an occluding or nonoccluding thrombus are major causes of acute coronary syndromes (ACSs). These advanced plaques are characterized by the presence of a large necrotic lipid core and a covering fibrous cap, which separates the circulating blood from the plaque underneath.1 In addition, in such unstable lesions, numerous monocytes/macrophages as well as CD4-positive lymphocytes accumulate in the shoulder region of the plaque and through the expression of inflammatory mediators these cells largely contribute to plaque instability.2 CD4-positive lymphocytes, releasing proinflammatory cytokines like interferon-{gamma} (IFN-{gamma}), induce the expression of matrix-degrading enzymes (matrix metalloproteinases [MMPs]) in macrophages and foam cells. These MMPs, by degrading collagen and elastin, lead to a thinning of the fibrous cap and thus render the plaque more vulnerable.3–5 Therapeutic strategies to stabilize such advanced lesions may prevent plaque rupture and subsequently reduce the incidence of ACSs.

Thiazolidinediones (TZDs), like rosiglitazone or pioglitazone, are a novel class of oral antidiabetic agents currently used to treat patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. These agents, activators of the nuclear transcription factor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma} (PPAR-{gamma}) increase insulin sensitivity and, as such, have favorable effects on blood glucose levels and the lipid profile in treated patients.6,7 Beyond their metabolic action, TZDs have been shown to exhibit antiinflammatory and antiatherogenic effects in vascular cells in vitro and limit lesion development in various animal models of arteriosclerosis.8 In treated patients, TZDs reduce serum levels of inflammatory biomarkers of arteriosclerosis like C-reactive protein (CRP)9–11 as well as MMPs,10,12 considered to be surrogate parameters for plaque instability. Therefore, these agents may also directly modulate the inflammatory process in the vessel wall and potentially influence lesion composition. Indeed, ultrasound data demonstrating a reduction of intima-media thickness (IMT) of the carotid artery13,14 as well as a reduction of neointima formation after coronary intervention on TZD treatment15,16 suggest that these drugs are capable of modulating plaque size and morphology in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Still, nothing is known about the effects of TZDs on lesion composition and histomorphological characteristics of plaque stability.

Therefore, we performed a randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind trial in nondiabetic patients scheduled to undergo elective carotid endarterectomy to evaluate the effect of 4 weeks rosiglitazone treatment on plaque composition and histomorphological parameters of plaque stability.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Study Design and Patient Selection
Twenty-four nondiabetic patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (>70%) were included in this randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind trial. Nondiabetic state was assessed by a negative history for diabetes mellitus, no treatment with antidiabetic drugs, or assessment of fasting blood glucose. All patients were recruited at the Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Ulm, Germany. Exclusion criteria were as follows: diabetes mellitus, chronic heart failure (New York Heart Association class III/IV), impaired liver function (AST or ALT 2.5-fold above upper normal limits), renal insufficiency requiring hemodialysis, pregnancy, systemic inflammatory disease, and life expectancy of <6 months. Patients scheduled for carotid endarterectomy were randomized to placebo or 4 mg rosiglitazone BID after written informed consent was obtained. Study medication was given on top of regular treatment. Patients were seen after 2 weeks for clinical follow-up and were scheduled for surgery after 4 weeks. Blood was taken in a fasting state at baseline and the morning of the procedure. The study was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the local ethics committee.

Immunohistochemical Staining
After surgery, plaque samples taken from the same part of the artery were immediately frozen and stored in liquid nitrogen. For immunohistochemistry, the following antibodies were used: mouse anti-human CD68 antibody (DAKO), anti-human CD4 antibody (DAKO), mouse anti-human CD34 class II antibody (DAKO), mouse anti-human {alpha} actin antibody (DAKO), mouse anti-human HLA-DR antibody (DAKO), rabbit anti-human antibody MMP-3 (Abcam), rabbit anti-human MMP-8 antibody (Abcam), and rabbit anti-human MMP-9 antibody (Abcam).

Serial cryostat section of carotid specimens were cut, air dried onto microscope slides, and fixed in acetone at –20°C for 10 minutes. The sections were preincubated for 10 minutes with methanol containing 1% hydrogen peroxidase and blocked for 30 minutes at 37°C with the appropriate serum. The primary antibody diluted in PBS was stained for 45 minutes, and for negative controls, type and isomatched IgG at similar concentration were used.

Finally, sections were incubated with the respective biotinylated secondary antibody (DAKO) followed by avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (Vector Laboratories).

Antibody binding was visualized with 3-amino-9-ethyl carbazole, and afterward, sections were counterstained with Gill’s Hematoxylin (Sigma).

Collagen content was assessed by Sirius red staining for interstitial collagen (types I and II). Frozen carotid plaque sections were fixed for 10 minutes in acetone, dehydrated with xylol and ethanol, and after rinsing with distilled water, the tissue sections were incubated with 0.1% Sirius red in saturated picric acid for 90 minutes. Sections were rinsed twice with 0.01N HCl and water. After dehydration with ethanol (70%, 90%, 100% Xylol), sections were observed under polarized light.

Computer-assisted image analysis was used to quantify staining on sections using Image-Pro Plus software (Media Cybernetics). In brief, the total plaque area of single microscopic sections of each patient was scanned and positive immunostaining was quantified using computer-assisted pixel detection. Positive pixels were expressed as percentage of total plaque area. Total plaque area was not significantly different between the 2 groups.

Measurement of Lipids and Inflammatory Biomarkers
Levels of total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol as well as triglycerides and LDL radius were assessed as described previously.17 Measurement for CRP and serum amyloid A (SAA) was performed as described previously.18

Statistical Analysis
Differences between groups were analyzed by the Mann–Whitney U test. Differences between treatment time points were calculated using Friedman repeated measurement ANOVA or 1-way repeated measurement ANOVA followed by the appropriate post hoc test. Skewed data were reported as median (interquartile range); all other data were reported as mean±SD. Spearman rank correlation was used to analyze correlation between parameters. Sample size was calculated based on the results of a previous trial examining the effect of pravastatin treatment on plaque collagen content with 11 patients in the verum and 13 patients in the control group.19 A P value <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Clinical Data
Twenty-four nondiabetic patients with carotid artery stenosis requiring endarterectomy were enrolled in this study and randomized to receive placebo (12 patients) or rosiglitazone (12 patients) for 4 weeks on top of regular therapy. In the rosiglitazone group, body mass index was significantly higher compared with placebo, but there was no significant difference with respect to all other baseline characteristics, including cardiovascular risk factors, medication, glucose, and lipid parameters, as well as inflammatory biomarkers of arteriosclerosis (Table 1). No serious drug-related side effects were observed.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Baseline Characteristics of Study Population

In this study population of nondiabetic patients, rosiglitazone treatment did not significantly change fasting blood glucose (5.3 [4.9 to 6.1] mmol/L versus 5.6 (4.7 to 6.4) mmol/L; P=0.56) or fasting insulin levels (14.0 [9.2 to 24.0] µU/mL versus 13.5 (7.7 to 38.3) µU/mL; P=0.95) compared with placebo at 4-week follow-up. In addition, rosiglitazone did not significantly change total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, or triglyceride levels (Table 2). Moreover, LDL particle size, shown previously to increase on TZD treatment,17 did not significantly change after rosiglitazone treatment for 4 weeks.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Metabolic Parameters at Baseline and After 4 Weeks

Inflammatory Cell Composition
To examine the effect of rosiglitazone treatment on inflammatory cell composition, we performed immunohistochemical staining of carotid artery specimens for CD4-positive lymphocytes, macrophages, as well as vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). Rosiglitazone treatment for 4 weeks significantly reduced CD4-positive lymphocytes compared with placebo (0.14±0.08% of plaque area versus 0.76±0.29% of plaque area; P=0.048) but had no significant effect on macrophage (Figure 1) and VSMC (data not shown) content in the plaque.


Figure 1
View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. CD4-positive lymphocyte content is reduced in plaques from rosiglitazone-treated patients. Representative sections of shoulder regions stained for CD4-positive lymphocytes and CD68-positive macrophages are shown from the placebo (A through E) and the rosiglitazone group (F through J). B and G show high-power views (x200) of the areas indicated in A and F for CD4 and E and J show high-power views of the areas indicated in D and I for CD68. C, E, H, and J, Adjacent sections stained with similar concentrations of the respective type and class-matched IgG show no immunoreactivity. Observations from 12 patients in the placebo and 12 patients in rosiglitazone group yielded similar results.

Given the nodal role of CD4-positive lymphocytes in vessel wall inflammation, we next examined the expression of HLA-DR, a protein reflecting cell activation by IFN-{gamma} released from CD4-positive cells.20 Compared with placebo, treatment with rosiglitazone significantly reduced immunoreactivity for HLA-DR (0.14±0.07% of plaque area versus 0.78±0.30% of plaque area; P=0.047), mainly in macrophages and to a lesser extent in VSMCs, suggesting limited IFN-{gamma}–induced cell activation in the plaque (Figure 2). Moreover, HLA-DR content in the plaque significantly correlated with the presence of CD4-positive lymphocytes (r=0.677; P=0.016), underscoring the importance of lymphocyte-mediated inflammation in these lesions.


Figure 2
View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. HLA-DR content is reduced in plaques from rosiglitazone-treated patients. Representative sections of shoulder regions stained for CD68-positive macrophages and HLA-DR are shown from the placebo (A through F) and the rosiglitazone group (G through L). B and H show high-power views (x200) of the areas indicated in A and G for CD68 and E and K show high power of the areas indicated in D and J for HLA-DR. C, F, I, and L, Adjacent sections stained with similar concentrations of the respective type and class-matched IgG show no immunoreactivity. Observations from 12 patients in the placebo and 12 patients in rosiglitazone group yielded similar results.

Plaque Stability
Because inflammatory cell activation with subsequent release of matrix-degrading MMPs from macrophages is a critical determinant for lesion vulnerability, we next compared MMP-3, MMP-8, and MMP-9 content in the carotid artery specimens. Staining of parallel sections revealed that the MMPs examined mainly colocalize with plaque macrophages (Figure I, available online at http://atvb.ahajournals.org). In plaques of rosiglitazone-treated patients, we found a reduction of MMP-3, MMP-8, and MMP-9 expression compared with placebo, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. MMP Content in Carotid Artery Specimens

Next, we examined whether this reduction in macrophage MMP expression by rosiglitazone resulted in an increase in collagen content in the plaque. As shown in Figure 3, picrosirius red staining demonstrated significantly higher collagen content in the rosiglitazone group compared with placebo (7.7±1.6% of plaque area versus 3.7±0.7% of plaque area; P=0.036).


Figure 3
View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Collagen content is increased in plaques from rosiglitazone-treated patients. Representative plaque areas show bright-field sections without polarization (A and C) and corresponding sections with Sirius red stain (B and D) to demonstrate collagen content in the placebo and rosiglitazone group. E, Quantitative image analysis of collagen content in plaques from the placebo and the rosiglitazone group. Bars represent mean±SEM expressed as percentage of plaque area; *P<0.05 compared with placebo; n=12 in each group.

Because recent data suggested that plaque microvessels are associated with plaque inflammation and may be indicators of lesion instability,21 we assessed CD34-positive tubuloluminal capillaries in plaques from both groups. Lesions from rosiglitazone-treated patients showed significantly lower CD34 immunoreactivity (0.04±0.02% of plaque area versus 0.18±0.04% of plaque area; P=0.004), indicating lower microvessel density compared with placebo (Figure II, available online at http://atvb.ahajournals.org). Together, these immunohistochemical data suggest that plaques from rosiglitazone-treated patients may be more stable than those from patients in the placebo group.

Markers of Vascular Inflammation and Plaque Stability
To investigate whether the decrease in plaque inflammation in the rosiglitazone group is associated with a reduction of inflammatory biomarkers of arteriosclerosis, we measured serum levels of CRP and SAA. As shown previously in studies with diabetic as well as nondiabetic subjects, rosiglitazone treatment significantly reduced both CRP (–61.9% [–69.4% to –31.8%]; P=0.016 compared with baseline) and SAA (–33.3% [–39.6% to –6.6%]; P=0.005 compared with baseline) already after 4 weeks, whereas no such effect was observed in the placebo group (Figure 4).


Figure 4
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Rosiglitazone treatment reduces CRP and SAA serum levels in nondiabetic patients. Data are presented as percentage change from baseline. Dots represent median; bars, interquartile range. *P<0.05 compared with baseline; n=12 in each group.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The present randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind trial demonstrates that 4 weeks of treatment with rosiglitazone reduces inflammatory cell composition and cell activation in carotid artery specimen of nondiabetic patients. Moreover, rosiglitazone increased collagen content in the plaque, suggesting that TZD treatment renders these plaques more stable and less vulnerable.

Previous studies have shown that TZDs exhibit antiinflammatory and antiatherogenic properties in vascular cells in vitro, and data from animal models of arteriosclerosis demonstrated a reduction in lesion development on TZD treatment.8 Moreover, clinical studies have shown that TZDs reduce serum levels of inflammatory arteriosclerosis markers in treated patients11,12,22 and induce beneficial morphological changes in the vessel wall by reducing IMT of the carotid artery13 as well as neointima formation after coronary stent implantation.15,16 The present study extends our knowledge on the effect of TZDs in the vessel wall by showing that rosiglitazone treatment for 4 weeks directly affects plaque composition by reducing inflammatory cell activation in the lesion, thus promoting formation of a more stable type of plaque. The modulation of vascular inflammation is evident by a reduction in CD4-positive cell infiltration as well as limited HLA-DR expression. CD4-positive lymphocytes are major effectors of the inflammatory response in the vessel wall through their capacity to release proinflammatory Th-1 cytokines like IFN-{gamma} and tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}. These cytokines are central stimulators of other cells like macrophages and VSMCs, thus orchestrating inflammatory cell activation within the plaque.1 HLA-DR is a marker of such cell activation by IFN-{gamma}. Therefore, a reduction in macrophage and VSMC HLA-DR immunoreactivity, as demonstrated here, suggests limited cell activation by this proinflammatory cytokine. The reduction in macrophage activation is mirrored by a trend to decreased expression of matrix-degrading MMPs in plaques of rosiglitazone-treated patients. The lack of a reduction of macrophage content seen here is consistent with a recent study in apolipoprotein E2 transgenic mice for which rosiglitazone did not decrease the number of macrophages.23 Still, others reported a reduction of macrophages on TZD treatment in preclinical animal models of arterioslerosis.24 In our study, a longer treatment period may have diminished plaque macrophage content, but our data suggest that short-term TZD therapy mainly affects inflammatory cell activation. Finally, we observed a significant increase in collagen content in the rosiglitazone group. This may be attributable to a reduction of IFN-{gamma} release from CD4-positive lymphocytes by TZDs because IFN-{gamma}, on the one hand, enhances matrix degradation by MMPs and, on the other hand, reduces VSMC collagen synthesis. TZDs may finally counterbalance both of these mechanisms. These data, together with our finding that microvessel density, a surrogate for plaque vulnerability, is reduced by rosiglitazone treatment, suggest that TZDs can directly stabilize arteriosclerotic lesions, thus rendering them less vulnerable and less susceptible to plaque rupture.

The effect of rosiglitazone on inflammatory plaque composition and plaque stability is likely to be independent of its metabolic action. First, our study was conducted in nondiabetic subjects, and we did not find any changes in blood glucose or insulin levels after 4 weeks of rosiglitazone treatment. In addition, we did not find changes in total cholesterol, HDL or LDL cholesterol, or triglyceride levels as well as LDL particle size, making it unlikely that the effects on plaque composition resulted from changes in the lipid profile or a shift from small-dense to large buoyant LDL particles. Moreover, the metabolic effects of TZDs usually occur after several weeks of treatment,25 whereas the histomorphological changes observed here are already present after 4 weeks. Still, we did not perform oral glucose tolerance testing in our patients and cannot exclude that some of the patients exhibit an impaired glucose tolerance, which may have been influenced by rosiglitazone treatment. However, the lack of an effect on blood glucose or insulin levels argues against a causal role of major metabolic effects for the histomorphological changes observed here. Patients in the rosiglitazone group had a significantly higher body mass index, potentially suggesting a more insulin-resistant state, which, on TZD treatment, may have contributed to the beneficial effects on plaque stability. On the other hand, glucose and insulin levels were not different before and after treatment, indicating that both groups are comparable with respect to insulin sensitivity.

The reduction of vascular inflammation is paralleled by a decrease in the inflammatory biomarkers CRP and SAA. These data are in line with previous studies, showing a reduction of these markers after short-time TZD treatment in nondiabetic subjects and may reflect the antiinflammatory action of these drugs in the vessel wall.26

The effects of rosiglitazone treatment on plaque inflammation and plaque vulnerability may have important therapeutic implications for the treatment of patients with vascular disease. Strategies to stabilize advanced arteriosclerotic lesions may prevent plaque rupture and reduce the incidence of macrovascular events. So far, only statins have been shown to have similar effects in patients with vascular disease.19,27 Our study now suggests an effect of TZD treatment on plaque stability, promoting the concept that PPAR{gamma}-activating TZDs, independent of their metabolic action, may exhibit direct protective action in the vessel wall. Such mechanisms may, in particular, be of importance with respect to the recently published PROactive trial.28 This study compared the effect of pioglitazone treatment versus placebo on macrovascular events in type 2 diabetic patients. Despite the fact that the combined primary end point (mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, ACS, coronary intervention, leg amputation, and leg revascularization) was not significantly changed by pioglitazone, a significant reduction of 16% was observed for the combined secondary end point of mortality, nonfatal MI, and stroke. Because all of these events are closely related to lesion vulnerability and plaque rupture, the findings reported here may at least in part contribute to such beneficial cardiovascular TZD effects.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by grants of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 451, projects B9 and B11) and the Else-Kröner Fresenius-Stiftung to N.M., as well as by a grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 451, projects B11) to D.W. The Department of Internal Medicine II, University of Ulm, received an unrestricted grant from GSK. We would like to thank Miriam Grüb, Renate Durst, and Gerlinde Trischler for expert technical assistance.


*    Footnotes
 
F.M. and D.W. contributed equally to this study.

Received November 2, 2005; accepted December 28, 2005.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Hansson GK. Inflammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 1685–1695.[Free Full Text]
  2. Cipollone F, Mezzetti A, Fazia ML, Cuccurullo C, Iezzi A, Ucchino S, Spigonardo F, Bucci M, Cuccurullo F, Prescott SM, Stafforini DM. Association between 5-lipoxygenase expression and plaque instability in humans. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005; 25: 1665–1670.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Hansson GK, Jonasson L, Lojsthed B, Stemme S, Kocher O, Gabbiani G. Localization of T lymphocytes and macrophages in fibrous and complicated human atherosclerotic plaques. Atherosclerosis. 1988; 72: 135–141.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Loftus IM, Naylor AR, Goodall S, Crowther M, Jones L, Bell PR, Thompson MM. Increased matrix metalloproteinase-9 activity in unstable carotid plaques. A potential role in acute plaque disruption. Stroke. 2000; 31: 40–47.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Loftus IM, Naylor AR, Bell PR. Plasma MMP-9 - a marker of carotid plaque instability. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2001; 21: 17–21.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Schoonjans K, Auwerx J. Thiazoledinediones: an update. Lancet. 2000; 355: 1008–1010.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Staels B, Fruchart JC. Therapeutic roles of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists. Diabetes. 2005; 54: 2460–2470.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Marx N, Duez H, Fruchart JC, Staels B. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and atherogenesis: regulators of gene expression in vascular cells. Circ Res. 2004; 94: 1168–1178.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Pfutzner A, Marx N, Lubben G, Langenfeld M, Walcher D, Konrad T, Forst T. Improvement of cardiovascular risk markers by pioglitazone is independent from glycemic control: results from the pioneer study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45: 1925–1931.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Haffner SM, Greenberg AS, Weston WM, Chen H, Williams K, Freed MI. Effect of rosiglitazone treatment on nontraditional markers of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2002; 106: 679–684.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Sidhu JS, Cowan D, Kaski JC. The effects of rosiglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist, on markers of endothelial cell activation, C-reactive protein, and fibrinogen levels in non-diabetic coronary artery disease patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 42: 1757–1763.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Marx N, Froehlich J, Siam L, Ittner J, Wierse G, Schmidt A, Scharnagl H, Hombach V, Koenig W. The antidiabetic PPARg-activator rosiglitazone reduces MMP-9 serum levels in type-2 diabetic patients with coronary artery disease. Arterioscl Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23: 283–288.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Langenfeld MR, Forst T, Hohberg C, Kann P, Lubben G, Konrad T, Fullert SD, Sachara C, Pfutzner A. Pioglitazone decreases carotid intima-media thickness independently of glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: results from a controlled randomized study. Circulation. 2005; 111: 2525–2531.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Minamikawa J, Tanaka S, Yamauchi M, Inoue D, Koshiyama H. Potent inhibitory effect of troglitazone on carotid arterial wall thickness in type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998; 83: 1818–1820.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Choi D, Kim SK, Choi SH, Ko YG, Ahn CW, Jang Y, Lim SK, Lee HC, Cha BS. Preventative effects of rosiglitazone on restenosis after coronary stent implantation in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004; 27: 2654–2660.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Marx N, Wöhrle J, Nusser T, Walcher D, Rinker A, Hombach V, Koenig W, Höher M. Pioglitazone reduces neointima volume after coronary stent implantation: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial in non-diabetic patients. Circulation. 2005; 112: 2792–2798.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Winkler K, Konrad T, Fullert S, Friedrich I, Destani R, Baumstark MW, Krebs K, Wieland H, Marz W. Pioglitazone reduces atherogenic dense LDL particles in nondiabetic patients with arterial hypertension: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26: 2588–2594.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Koenig W Haemostatic risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. Eur Heart J. 1998; 19 (suppl C): C39–C43.
  19. Crisby M, Nordin-Fredriksson G, Shah PK, Yano J, Zhu J, Nilsson J. Pravastatin treatment increases collagen content and decreases lipid content, inflammation, metalloproteinases, and cell death in human carotid plaques: implications for plaque stabilization. Circulation. 2001; 103: 926–933.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Warner SJ, Friedman GB, Libby P. Regulation of major histocompatibility gene expression in human vascular smooth muscle cells. Arteriosclerosis. 1989; 9: 279–288.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Moreno PR, Purushothaman KR, Fuster V, Echeverri D, Truszczynska H, Sharma SK, Badimon JJ, O’Connor WN. Plaque neovascularization is increased in ruptured atherosclerotic lesions of human aorta: implications for plaque vulnerability. Circulation. 2004; 110: 2032–2038.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Marx N, Froehlich J, Siam L, Ittner J, Wierse G, Schmidt A, März W, Hombach V, Koenig W. Effect of rosiglitazone treatment on soluble CD40L in type-2 diabetic patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2003; 107: 1954–1957.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Hennuyer N, Tailleux A, Torpier G, Mezdour H, Fruchart JC, Staels B, Fievet C. PPARalpha, but not PPARgamma, activators decrease macrophage-laden atherosclerotic lesions in a nondiabetic mouse model of mixed dyslipidemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005; 25: 1897–1902.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Collins AR, Meehan WP, Kintscher U, Jackson S, Wakino S, Noh G, Palinski W, Hsueh WA, Law RE. Troglitazone inhibits formation of early atherosclerotic lesions in diabetic and nondiabetic low density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001; 21: 365–371.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Raskin P, Rappaport EB, Cole ST, Yan Y, Patwardhan R, Freed MI. Rosiglitazone short-term monotherapy lowers fasting and post-prandial glucose in patients with type II diabetes. Diabetologia. 2000; 43: 278–284.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Hetzel J, Balletshofer B, Rittig K, Walcher D, Kratzer W, Hombach V, Haring HU, Koenig W, Marx N. Rapid effects of rosiglitazone treatment on endothelial function and inflammatory biomarkers. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005; 25: 1804–1809.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Martin-Ventura JL, Blanco-Colio LM, Gomez-Hernandez A, Munoz-Garcia B, Vega M, Serrano J, Ortega L, Hernandez G, Tunon J, Egido J. Intensive treatment with atorvastatin reduces inflammation in mononuclear cells and human atherosclerotic lesions in one month. Stroke. 2005; 36: 1796–1800.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Dormandy JA, Charbonnel B, Eckland DJA, Erdmann E, Massi-Benedetti M, Moules IK, Skene AM, Tan MH, Lefebvre PJ, Murray GD, Standl E, Wilcox RG, Wilhelmsen L, Betteridge J, Birkeland K, Golay A, Heine RJ, Koranyi L, Laakso M, Mokan M, Norkus A, Pirags V, Podar T, Scheen A, Scherbaum W, Schernthaner G, Schmitz O, Skrha J, Smith U, Taton J; PROactive Investigators. Secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the PROactive Study (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005; 366: 1279–1289.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
E. Rigamonti, C. Fontaine, B. Lefebvre, C. Duhem, P. Lefebvre, N. Marx, B. Staels, and G. Chinetti-Gbaguidi
Induction of CXCR2 Receptor by Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} in Human Macrophages
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2008; 28(5): 932 - 939.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
A. S. Kelly, A. M. Thelen, D. R. Kaiser, J. M. Gonzalez-Campoy, and A. J. Bank
Rosiglitazone improves endothelial function and inflammation but not asymmetric dimethylarginine or oxidative stress in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Vascular Medicine, November 1, 2007; 12(4): 311 - 318.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
H. Shen, R. MacDonald, D. Bruemmer, A. Stromberg, A. Daugherty, X.-a. Li, M. Toborek, and B. Hennig
Zinc Deficiency Alters Lipid Metabolism in LDL Receptor Deficient Mice Treated with Rosiglitazone
J. Nutr., November 1, 2007; 137(11): 2339 - 2345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
B. Askari, J. E. Kanter, A. M. Sherrid, D. L. Golej, A. T. Bender, J. Liu, W. A. Hsueh, J. A. Beavo, R. A. Coleman, and K. E. Bornfeldt
Rosiglitazone Inhibits Acyl-CoA Synthetase Activity and Fatty Acid Partitioning to Diacylglycerol and Triacylglycerol via a Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{gamma}-Independent Mechanism in Human Arterial Smooth Muscle Cells and Macrophages
Diabetes, April 1, 2007; 56(4): 1143 - 1152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. D. Brown and J. Plutzky
Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptors as Transcriptional Nodal Points and Therapeutic Targets
Circulation, January 30, 2007; 115(4): 518 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
26/4/845    most recent
01.ATV.0000203511.66681.7fv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meisner, F.
Right arrow Articles by Marx, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meisner, F.
Right arrow Articles by Marx, N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other diabetes
Right arrow Other Treatment
Right arrow Other Vascular biology
Right arrow Pathophysiology