Published online before print December 8, 2005, doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000199679.40501.ac
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Vascular Biology |
Conjugated Linoleic Acid Impairs Endothelial Function
From Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK; University of Glamorgan, Pontypridd, UK; Royal Glamorgan Hospital, Llantrisant, UK; Wales Heart Research Institute, Cardiff, UK; Dept Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Correspondence to Justin S. W. Taylor, Department of Cardiology, Morriston Hospital, Morriston, Swansea SA6 6NL, UK. E-mail jswt{at}totalise.co.uk
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Objectives— To determine the effect of dietary supplementation with conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) on body mass index (BMI), body fat distribution, endothelial function, and markers of cardiovascular risk.
Methods and Results— Forty healthy volunteers with BMI >27 kg/m2 were randomized to receive a CLA isomeric mixture or olive oil in a 12-week double-blind study. Subcutaneous body fat and abdominal/hepatic fat content were assessed using skin-fold thicknesses and computed tomography scanning, respectively. Endothelial function was assessed by brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation (FMD). Plasma isoprostanes were measured as an index of oxidative stress. CLA supplementation did not result in a significant change in BMI index or total body fat. There was a significant decrease in limb (–7.8 mm, P<0.001), but not torso skin-fold thicknesses or abdominal or liver fat content. Brachial artery FMD declined (–1.3%, P=0.013), and plasma F2-isoprostanes increased (+91pg/mL, P=0.042).
Conclusions— A CLA isomeric mixture had at most modest effects on adiposity and worsened endothelial function. On the basis of these results, the use of the isomeric mixture of CLA as an aid to weight loss cannot be recommended.
Twelve-week supplementation with isomeric conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) did not change BMI or total body fat compared with olive oil. There was a decrease in limb, but not torso skin fold thicknesses, a decrease in FMD of the brachial artery, and an increase in plasma F2-isoprostanes. Isomeric CLA cannot be recommended as a dietary supplement to aid weight loss.
Key Words: body composition • conjugated linoleic acid • endothelial function • obesity • oxidative stress
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Abdominal obesity1 and the associated dysmetabolic syndrome2 confer increased cardiovascular risk. Dietary modification with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids appears to reduce the risk of coronary artery disease and improve mortality.3–5 Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) is a naturally occurring fatty acid and is found in dairy products and meat from ruminants. It differs from the better known linoleic acid by having an extra carbon-carbon double bond. It has been widely promoted in the lay press,6 with claims that it can prevent and treat cancer,7 prevent heart disease,8 improve immune function,9 and treat obesity.10 Whereas some of these effects are supported by studies in animals,8,11 there is conflicting published human research on CLA, and in particular there have been no conclusive studies measuring its effect on markers of cardiovascular risk. Furthermore, it is now realized that the different isomers of CLA may have very different biological properties and may have different mechanisms of action.12 The 2 main CLA isomers that have been studied are 9,11 and 10,12 CLA. Other studies have suggested that CLA supplementation may increase oxidative stress, although this was not proven.16,17 Furthermore, the small number of studies thus far published have suggested that in humans, weight loss produced by CLA supplementation is at most modest.10,13,16,18 To assess the efficacy of CLA as an aid to weight loss and its effect on cardiovascular risk factors, we undertook a double blind study examining the effects of a commercially available isomeric mixture of CLA on body weight, body fat mass and distribution, endothelial function, insulin sensitivity, and markers of oxidative stress in overweight middle-aged men.
|
Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Subjects
Forty nonsmoking white men, aged 35 to 60, without diabetes, hypertension, or cardiovascular disease, with a body mass index (BMI) >27 kg/m2 were recruited from the local community through media advertisements. All subjects gave informed written consent and the protocol was approved by the local research and ethics committee.
Protocol
Subjects were randomly assigned to receive 4.5 g/d of CLA(isomeric mixture 60 calories/d) or olive oil(54 calories/d). The randomization was performed by an independent observer who also matched subjects by age and BMI. The isomeric mixture contained 35% 9c,11t CLA, 36% t10,c12 CLA, 1% to 2% 9c,11c and 10c,12c CLA, 1.5% 9t,11t and 10t,11t CLA, and <1% t8,c10 and c11,t13 CLA. The CLA and olive oil capsules were supplied by Natural Lipids (Hovdebygda, Norway). All vascular measurements were made in the morning after an overnight fast, at the beginning of the study, and after 12 weeks of supplementation.
Body Composition
Body weight and height were measured and BMI calculated. Skin-fold thicknesses were measured according to standard guidelines19 with Harpenden skinfold calipers (Holtain Ltd, Crymych, UK) at the following sites: biceps, triceps, front mid-thigh, medial calf, subscapular, mid-axillary, and abdominal. Abdominal, waist, and hip girths were measured. All measurements were made in triplicate and averaged. Bioelectrical impedance analysis was performed using the tetrapolar method and a Bodystat 1500 analyser (Bodystat Ltd, Isle of Man). Abdominal adipose tissue and liver fat were measured using two computed tomography (CT) images as described previously.20 Abdominal adipose tissue is presented as a surface area at the level of the fourth lumbar vertebrae, and hepatic and splenic fat is presented as radiographic density in Hounsfield units (HU). Images were acquired using a Somatom Plus 4 scanner. CT slices were 10 mm in thickness and were obtained at 120 kV and 200 mA, with a 42-cm field of view and a 512x512 matrix. Image analysis was performed using dedicated software (SliceOmatic Version 4.2; Tomovision, Montreal, Canada).
Endothelial Function
Changes in brachial artery diameter in response to reactive hyperemia (FMD) were measured noninvasively using a high-resolution ultrasonic wall-tracking system (Vadirec Wall-track SystemTM) as previously validated.21,49,50 Studies were performed at a controlled temperature of 21°C, with subjects supine and their arm held outstretched on a cushion. Baseline measurements of internal brachial artery diameter were taken after 15 minutes of rest. Reactive hyperemia was produced by releasing a pediatric sphygmomanometer wrist cuff inflated to systolic pressure plus 50 mm Hg for 5 minutes. Internal brachial artery diameter was measured every minute after cuff release, and the maximum change from baseline was used to calculate FMD. Data are presented as the percentage diameter change from baseline in the brachial artery.
Laboratory Measurements
Venous blood samples were freshly analyzed for glucose, insulin, cholesterol (including low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein), and C-reactive protein. Further samples were centrifuged and the supernatant frozen at –80°C. These samples were analyzed later using enzyme immuno-linked assays for leptin (Alexis), adiponectin (Biogenesis UK), F2-isoprostanes (Alexis), and tumor necrosis factor-
(paired antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). Insulin sensitivity was measured indirectly using HOMA-IR [fasting serum insulin (µU/mL)xfasting plasma glucose (mmol/L)/22.5].
Statistical Analysis
Analysis was performed using SPSS v11.5. Baseline values are presented as mean±SD. Variables with a skewed distribution were logarithmically transformed to achieve a normal distribution prior to analysis. Baseline comparison between the CLA and olive oil groups was assessed by Student t test. The effects of treatment with CLA versus olive oil were assessed by using ANCOVA using baseline values as covariates and are presented with 95% confidence intervals. To avoid type I errors, post-hoc Bonferroni corrections were applied to the groups of primary objective measurements. Therefore, 2-tailed P<0.025, P<0.005, P<0.001, P<0.025, and P<0.008 were regarded as significant for blood pressure, skin-folds, girths, FMD, and abdominal CT measurements, respectively. A 2-tailed P<0.05 was regarded as significant for primary objective measurements weight, and bioimpedance, and the exploratory blood analyses.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Baseline measurements did not differ significantly in the olive oil (19 subjects) and CLA (21 subjects) groups (Table 1). All subjects completed the study. The effect of 12 weeks of supplementation is shown in Table 2. The important changes are also displayed in the Figure. There were no significant changes in parameters in the olive oil group except for a decline in tumor necrosis factor-
(–61pg/mL [95% CI, –3 to –120]; P=0.04). In the CLA group there was no significant change in body mass (–1.1 kg [95% CI, –2.3 to 0.04]; P=0.06), BMI (–0.4kg/m2 [95% CI, –0.8 to 0.03]; P=0.07), or total body fat (–1% [95% CI, –2.5 to 0.5]; P=0.18). There was a significant decrease in limb (–7.8 mm [95% CI, –11.1 to –4.5]; P<0.001), but not torso (–4.0 mm [95% CI, –11.5 to 3.5]; P=0.29) skin folds, and a significant increase in the total torso-to-limb skin-fold ratio(+0.13 [95% CI, 0.03 to 0.24]; P=0.017). There was no significant change in abdominal, waist, or hip girths, or in subcutaneous abdominal fat and liver fat measured by CT. However, there was a significant decrease in brachial artery FMD (–1.3% [95% CI, –2.4 to –0.3]; P=0.013), and a significant increase in plasma F2-isoprostanes(+91pg/mL [95% CI, 3 to 178]; P=0.042). There was no change in estimated insulin sensitivity, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, CRP, leptin, or adiponectin.
|
|
|
There was a significant negative correlation between change in F2-isoprostanes and change in total limb skin folds (ie, loss of limb skin-fold thickness was associated with an increase in F2-isoprostanes) for the entire group (CLA+olive oil) (P=0.012) but no significant correlation when each group was analyzed separately. There was no significant correlation between change in endothelial function and change in F2-isoprostanes or change in limb skin-fold thicknesses.
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Obesity, and in particular abdominal obesity, is associated with increased cardiovascular risk,22–24 and intentional weight reduction improves cardiovascular risk.25,26 Recently there has been a great deal of interest in the effect of the Mediterranean diet on cardiovascular risk. A 2-year study examining the effect of the Mediterranean diet in patients with the metabolic syndrome found a reduction in body weight, an improvement in endothelial function, a decrease in CRP and an improvement in insulin resistance.27 A study that tried to identify which component of the Mediterranean diet was responsible for improving cardiovascular risk paradoxically found that olive oil impaired endothelial function, although this was inversely correlated with changes in triglycerides.28 The conclusion of the study was that it was the antioxidant and omega-3–rich foods that conferred cardiovascular benefit. Nevertheless, these studies supported the view that dietary modification or supplementation may have a significant impact on obesity and, in particular, cardiovascular risk.
Experimental evidence in animal models suggests that CLA supplementation, in particular the 10,12 CLA isomer, induces fat mass loss.29–32 On the basis of this initial evidence, there has been a great deal of interest in its use as an aid to lose fat and weight in humans. Blankson et al reported that 12-week supplementation with >3.4 g/d isomeric CLA significantly reduced body fat mass in overweight volunteers, although there was no change in weight or BMI,10 and Riserus et al found that only 4-week supplementation with 4.2 g/d isomeric CLA significantly improved sagittal abdominal diameter.33 However, Zambell et al found no significant change in weight, BMI, or fat mass after 3-g/d supplementation with isomeric CLA (in women who were not overweight).18 The observation in two studies of an impairment of insulin sensitivity have raised concerns.13–15 This study was therefore designed to assess the effect of CLA supplementation on BMI, body fat distribution, and markers of cardiovascular risk, including endothelial function.
Our study found that an isomeric mixture of CLA did not cause significant weight loss (although there was a trend to weight loss of 1.1 kg). This is consistent with the 0.24 to 0.46 kg weight loss reported in previous studies.13,18 Although CLA reduced limb fat, it had no effect on abdominal fat or liver fat(although there was a nonsignificant trend to an increase in liver fat, measured as a decrease in liver density in Hounsfield units). This finding is in contrast to a previous report that found a decrease in sagittal abdominal diameter after 4 weeks of 4.2 g/d CLA.33 However, the suggestion that CLA may have a lipodystrophic effect is not new. A study supplementing mice with isomeric CLA found a reduction in fat mass, liver hypertrophy, and an increase in insulin resistance,34 whereas mice fed the 10,12 CLA isomer had hyperinsulinemia and an increase in liver fat develop.35 The mechanism for this is not clear, although a rapid decrease in leptin and adiponectin has been observed in mice only 2 days after starting CLA supplementation.36 A decrease in leptin has also been observed in rats.37 This hypothesis is supported by the observation that hyperinsulinemia and liver steatosis are partially reversed when hypoleptinemia is normalized by leptin infusion in CLA lipoatrophic mice.34 However, there is conflicting evidence regarding the effects of CLA supplementation on plasma leptin in humans. One study supplementing patients with type 2 diabetes with CLA found a decrease in leptin,38 but another study supplementing obese men with CLA found no change in leptin.13 No clinical studies in humans have measured adiponectin after CLA supplementation. In contrast to these findings, a study supplementing Zucker diabetic fatty rats with CLA found that the previous impaired glucose tolerance improved.39
Cell culture and animal studies have suggested several other potential mechanisms by which CLA may reduce body fat, including reducing apolipoprotein B secretion in HepG2 cells,40 increasing carnitine palmitoyltransferase activity and decreasing lipoprotein lipase activity,30 and increasing tumor necrosis factor and uncoupling protein levels.34 The role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR
) activity is not clear. PPAR activity was increased in Zucker diabetic fatty rats and genetically obese mice fed CLA,39,41,42 although several in vitro studies have found that 10,12 CLA downregulates PPAR activity in mice adipocytes.43,44 In vivo and in vitro studies in pigs have also found that CLA induced an increase in PPAR activity.45 However, human studies have found an opposite effect on PPAR. Human adipocytes cultured in vitro with 10,12 CLA decreased the expression of PPAR,41,43 and diabetic patients treated with PPAR agonists (glitazones) experience decreased central fat and increased peripheral fat.46
Our observations are important because reducing nonabdominal fat is less likely to reduce cardiovascular risk, and an increase in hepatic fat will increase insulin requirements.47 Thus any weight loss with this regime is at most modest and the pattern of weight loss is not metabolically favorable.
Furthermore, we found that CLA significantly impaired brachial artery endothelial function, consistent with an adverse impact on cardiovascular risk.51 The mechanism of this effect is not clear. We and others16 found an increase in F2 isoprostanes, a lipid peroxidation product generally considered to be a marker of increased oxidative stress. Another previous study reported an increase in plasma CRP, a marker of inflammation.17 Taken together, these data suggest that this CLA regime impairs endothelial function and that this may, at least in part, be caused by increased oxidative stress. It is possible that the observed change in FMD in this study has been caused by the change in limb skin-fold thicknesses interfering with the FMD technique (for example, by altering wrist arterial occlusion pressure or changing depth from probe to brachial artery), thus giving a false measurement. However, we feel that this is unlikely because a high wrist arterial occlusion pressure was used and a change in depth to the brachial artery of 1 to 2 mm is well within the capability of the ultrasound probe. Brachial artery FMD measurements vary markedly from laboratory to laboratory, dependant on the exact technique used.48 In this study, we used the wrist cuff technique, which results in lower values of brachial artery FMD than those obtained using the upper arm or mid-forearm techniques. We did not observe an adverse impact on insulin sensitivity. However, the study may have been under-powered to detect differences using the HOMA technique.52 We did not identify any change in plasma lipid profiles.
The effect of CLA on other cardiovascular risk factors has been examined. One study reported that CLA decreased platelet aggregability,53 but another reported no change in platelet aggregability.54 A small decrease in total, low-density lipoprotein, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was found in overweight men taking 1.7 g/d CLA and 3.4 g/d CLA, although this was not maintained at higher doses.10 A further study in obese men using 10,12 CLA and a CLA mixture lowered high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, although no change was observed in total or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol or triglycerides.13 No change in lipids was found in a study with healthy women supplemented with 3.9 g/d CLA.55
Consistent with our observations, 4.2 g/d CLA for 1 month was found to increase urinary isoprostanes in men with abdominal obesity.16 Isoprostanes are produced from peroxidation of lipids, and it was suggested that the increase in isoprostanes might be simply a result of increased fat lipolysis, rather than indicating increased oxidative stress. However, more recent studies have found that 10,12 CLA increases insulin resistance13 and plasma CRP.17 Taken together with our observation of an impairment of endothelial function, it seems highly likely that the increase in isoprostanes does indeed imply an increase in oxidative stress.
Conclusions
CLA supplementation for 12 weeks using the regime used in this study had no significant effect on BMI. Even if this represents a type 2 error, the reduction is at most modest, consistent with previous reports in man. Furthermore, the pattern of fat loss is peripheral rather than central. Importantly, the observed impairment of endothelial function and increase in markers of oxidative stress raise concerns about the widespread use of this agent until further studies demonstrate its cardiovascular safety or otherwise.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Source of funding: British Heart Foundation Project Grant.
Received January 24, 2005; accepted November 29, 2005.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
1. Peiris AN, Sothmann MS, Hoffmann RG, Hennes MI, Wilson CR, Gustafson AB, Kissebah AH. Adiposity, fat distribution, and cardiovascular risk. Ann Intern Med. 1989; 110: 867–872.
2. Isomaa B, Almgren P, Tuomi T, Forsen B, Lahti K, Nissen M, Taskinen MR, Groop L. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2001; 24: 683–689.
3. Bigger JT, Jr., El Sherif T. Polyunsaturated fatty acids and cardiovascular events: a fish tale. Circulation. 2001; 103: 623–625.
4. Hu FB, Stampfer MJ, Manson JE, Rimm EB, Wolk A, Colditz GA, Hennekens CH, Willett WC. Dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid and risk of fatal ischemic heart disease among women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999; 69: 890–897.
5. Dietary supplementation with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and vitamin E after myocardial infarction: results of the GISSI-Prevenzione trial. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell’Infarto miocardico. Lancet. 1999; 354: 447–455.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Wahle KWJ, Heys SD. Conjugated Linoleic Acids (CLA): Are they Ambrosia or Merely a Panacea. Rowett Research Institute - News & Reviews [1], 4–7. 1–12-2001. 1–12-2001.
7. Lee KW, Lee HJ, Cho HY, Kim YJ. Role of the conjugated linoleic acid in the prevention of cancer. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2005; 45: 135–144.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Kritchevsky D, Tepper SA, Wright S, Tso P, Czarnecki SK. Influence of conjugated linoleic acid(CLA) on establishment and progression of atherosclerosis in rabbits. J Am Coll Nutr. 2000; 19: 472S–477S.
9. Ntambi JM, Choi Y, Park Y, Peters JM, Pariza MW. Effects of conjugated linoleic acid(CLA) on immune responses, body composition and stearoyl-CoA desaturase. Can J Appl Physiol. 2002; 27: 617–628.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Blankson H, Stakkestad JA, Fagertun H, Thom E, Wadstein J, Gudmundsen O. Conjugated linoleic acid reduces body fat mass in overweight and obese humans. J Nutr. 2000; 130: 2943–2948.
11. Hargrave KM, Li C, Meyer BJ, Kachman SD, Hartzell DL, Della-Fera MA, Miner JL, Baile CA. Adipose depletion and apoptosis induced by trans-10, cis-12 conjugated linoleic Acid in mice. Obes Res. 2002; 10: 1284–1290.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Pariza MW, Park Y, Cook ME. Mechanisms of action of conjugated linoleic acid: evidence and speculation. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 2000; 223: 8–13.
13. Riserus U, Arner P, Brismar K, Vessby B. Treatment with dietary trans10cis12 conjugated linoleic acid causes isomer-specific insulin resistance in obese men with the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25: 1516–1521.
14. Riserus U, Vessby B, Arnlov J, Basu S. Effects of cis-9,trans-11 conjugated linoleic acid supplementation on insulin sensitivity, lipid peroxidation, and proinflammatory markers in obese men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004; 80: 279–283.
15. Moloney F, Yeow TP, Mullen A, Nolan JJ, Roche HM. Conjugated linoleic acid supplementation, insulin sensitivity, and lipoprotein metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004; 80: 887–895.
16. Basu S, Riserus U, Turpeinen A, Vessby B. Conjugated linoleic acid induces lipid peroxidation in men with abdominal obesity. Clin Sci (Colch). 2000; 99: 511–516.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Riserus U, Basu S, Jovinge S, Fredrikson GN, Arnlov J, Vessby B. Supplementation with conjugated linoleic acid causes isomer-dependent oxidative stress and elevated C-reactive protein: a potential link to fatty acid-induced insulin resistance. Circulation. 2002; 106: 1925–1929.
18. Zambell KL, Keim NL, Van Loan MD, Gale B, Benito P, Kelley DS, Nelson GJ. Conjugated linoleic acid supplementation in humans: effects on body composition and energy expenditure. Lipids. 2000; 35: 777–782.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1991.
20. Nguyen-Duy TB, Nichaman MZ, Church TS, Blair SN, Ross R. Visceral fat and liver fat are independent predictors of metabolic risk factors in men. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2003; 284: E1065–E1071.
21. Goodfellow J, Bellamy MF, Ramsey MW, Jones CJ, Lewis MJ. Dietary supplementation with marine omega-3 fatty acids improve systemic large artery endothelial function in subjects with hypercholesterolemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35: 265–270.
22. Misra A, Vikram NK. Clinical and pathophysiological consequences of abdominal adiposity and abdominal adipose tissue depots. Nutrition. 2003; 19: 457–466.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Hwu CM, Fuh JL, Hsiao CF, Wang SJ, Lu SR, Wei MC, Kao WY, Hsiao LC, Ho LT. Waist circumference predicts metabolic cardiovascular risk in postmenopausal Chinese women. Menopause. 2003; 10: 73–80.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Lamarche B. Abdominal obesity and its metabolic complications: implications for the risk of ischaemic heart disease. Coron Artery Dis. 1998; 9: 473–481.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Tuomilehto J, Lindstrom J, Eriksson JG, Valle TT, Hamalainen H, Ilanne-Parikka P, Keinanen-Kiukaanniemi S, Laakso M, Louheranta A, Rastas M, Salminen V, Uusitupa M. Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 1343–1350.
26. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA, Nathan DM. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 393–403.
27. Esposito K, Marfella R, Ciotola M, Di Palo C, Giugliano F, Giugliano G, D’Armiento M, D’Andrea F, Giugliano D. Effect of a mediterranean-style diet on endothelial dysfunction and markers of vascular inflammation in the metabolic syndrome: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2004; 292: 1440–1446.
28. Vogel RA, Corretti MC, Plotnick GD. The postprandial effect of components of the Mediterranean diet on endothelial function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36: 1455–1460.
29. DeLany JP, Blohm F, Truett AA, Scimeca JA, West DB. Conjugated linoleic acid rapidly reduces body fat content in mice without affecting energy intake. Am J Physiol. 1999; 276: R1172–R1179.
30. Park Y, Albright KJ, Liu W, Storkson JM, Cook ME, Pariza MW. Effect of conjugated linoleic acid on body composition in mice. Lipids. 1997; 32: 853–858.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Park Y, Storkson JM, Albright KJ, Liu W, Pariza MW. Evidence that the trans-10,cis-12 isomer of conjugated linoleic acid induces body composition changes in mice. Lipids. 1999; 34: 235–241.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Cook ME, Drake B, Jerome D, Pariza MW. The interaction of 9c, 11t/9t, 11c and 10t, 12c conjugated linoleic acid on fat deposition in mice. Fed Am Soc Exp Biol J. 1999; 13: A1023.
33. Riserus U, Berglund L, Vessby B. Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) reduced abdominal adipose tissue in obese middle-aged men with signs of the metabolic syndrome: a randomised controlled trial. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001; 25: 1129–1135.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Tsuboyama-Kasaoka N, Takahashi M, Tanemura K, Kim HJ, Tange T, Okuyama H, Kasai M, Ikemoto S, Ezaki O. Conjugated linoleic acid supplementation reduces adipose tissue by apoptosis and develops lipodystrophy in mice. Diabetes. 2000; 49: 1534–1542.[Abstract]
35. Clement L, Poirier H, Niot I, Bocher V, Guerre-Millo M, Krief S, Staels B, Besnard P. Dietary trans-10,cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid induces hyperinsulinemia and fatty liver in the mouse. J Lipid Res. 2002; 43: 1400–1409.
36. Poirier H, Rouault C, Clement L, Niot I, Monnot MC, Guerre-Millo M, Besnard P Hyperinsulinaemia triggered by dietary conjugated linoleic acid is associated with a decrease in leptin and adiponectin plasma levels and pancreatic beta cell hyperplasia in the mouse. Diabetologia. 2005.
37. Yamasaki M, Mansho K, Ogino Y, Kasai M, Tachibana H, Yamada K. Acute reduction of serum leptin level by dietary conjugated linoleic acid in Sprague-Dawley rats. J Nutr Biochem. 2000; 11: 467–471.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Belury MA, Mahon A, Banni S. The conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomer, t10c12-CLA, is inversely associated with changes in body weight and serum leptin in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Nutr. 2003; 133: 257S–260S.
39. Houseknecht KL, Vanden Heuvel JP, Moya-Camarena SY, Portocarrero CP, Peck LW, Nickel KP, Belury MA. Dietary conjugated linoleic acid normalizes impaired glucose tolerance in the Zucker diabetic fatty fa/fa rat. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998; 244: 678–682.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Yotsumoto H, Hara E, Naka S, Adlof R, Emken E, Yanagita T. 10trans, 12cis-linoleic acid reduces apolipoprotein B secretion in HepG2 cells. Food Res Int. 1999; 31: 403–409.[CrossRef]
41. Brown JM, Boysen MS, Jensen SS, Morrison RF, Storkson J, Lea-Currie R, Pariza M, Mandrup S, McIntosh MK. Isomer-specific regulation of metabolism and PPARgamma signaling by CLA in human preadipocytes. J Lipid Res. 2003; 44: 1287–1300.
42. Wargent E, Sennitt MV, Stocker C, Mayes AE, Brown L, O’Dowd J, Wang S, Einerhand AW, Mohede I, Arch JR, Cawthorne MA. Prolonged treatment of genetically obese mice with conjugated linoleic acid improves glucose tolerance and lowers plasma insulin concentration: possible involvement of PPAR activation. Lipids Health Dis. 2005; 4: 3.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Granlund L, Juvet LK, Pedersen JI, Nebb HI. Trans10, cis12-conjugated linoleic acid prevents triacylglycerol accumulation in adipocytes by acting as a PPARgamma modulator. J Lipid Res. 2003; 44: 1441–1452.
44. Kang K, Liu W, Albright KJ, Park Y, Pariza MW. trans-10,cis-12 CLA inhibits differentiation of 3T3–L1 adipocytes and decreases PPAR gamma expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003; 303: 795–799.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Changhua L, Jindong Y, Defa L, Lidan Z, Shiyan Q, Jianjun X. Conjugated linoleic acid attenuates the production and gene expression of proinflammatory cytokines in weaned pigs challenged with lipopolysaccharide. J Nutr. 2005; 135: 239–244.
46. Smith SA. Central role of the adipocyte in the insulin-sensitising and cardiovascular risk modifying actions of the thiazolidinediones. Biochimie. 2003; 85: 1219–1230.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Ryysy L, Hakkinen AM, Goto T, Vehkavaara S, Westerbacka J, Halavaara J, Yki-Jarvinen H. Hepatic fat content and insulin action on free fatty acids and glucose metabolism rather than insulin absorption are associated with insulin requirements during insulin therapy in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes. 2000; 49: 749–758.[Abstract]
48. Bots ML, Westerink J, Rabelink TJ, de Koning EJ. Assessment of flow-mediated vasodilatation(FMD) of the brachial artery: effects of technical aspects of the FMD measurement on the FMD response. Eur Heart J. 2005; 26: 363–368.
49. Smith JC, Evans LM, Wilkinson I, Goodfellow J, Cockcroft JR, Scanlon MF, Davies JS. Effects of GH replacement on endothelial function and large-artery stiffness in GH-deficient adults: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2002; 56: 493–501.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Evans M, Anderson RA, Smith JC, Khan N, Graham JM, Thomas AW, Morris K, Deely D, Frenneaux MP, Davies JS, Rees A. Effects of insulin lispro and chronic vitamin C therapy on postprandial lipaemia, oxidative stress and endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Eur J Clin Invest. 2003; 33: 231–238.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Quyyumi AA Prognostic value of endothelial function. Am J Cardiol. 2003; 91: 19H–24H.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
52. Wallace TM, Levy JC, Matthews DR. Use and abuse of HOMA modeling. Diabetes Care. 2004; 27: 1487–1495.
53. Truitt A, McNeill G, Vanderhoek JY. Antiplatelet effects of conjugated linoleic acid isomers. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999; 1438: 239–246.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
54. Benito P, Nelson GJ, Kelley DS, Bartolini G, Schmidt PC, Simon V. The effect of conjugated linoleic acid on platelet function, platelet fatty acid composition, and blood coagulation in humans. Lipids. 2001; 36: 221–227.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
55. Benito P, Nelson GJ, Kelley DS, Bartolini G, Schmidt PC, Simon V. The effect of conjugated linoleic acid on plasma lipoproteins and tissue fatty acid composition in humans. Lipids. 2001; 36: 229–236.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  I. Sluijs, Y. Plantinga, B. de Roos, L. I Mennen, and M. L Bots Dietary supplementation with cis-9,trans-11 conjugated linoleic acid and aortic stiffness in overweight and obese adults Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2010; 91(1): 175 - 183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Raff, T. Tholstrup, S. Toubro, J. M. Bruun, P. Lund, E. M. Straarup, R. Christensen, M. B. Sandberg, and S. Mandrup Conjugated Linoleic Acids Reduce Body Fat in Healthy Postmenopausal Women J. Nutr., July 1, 2009; 139(7): 1347 - 1352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Raff, T. Tholstrup, S. Basu, P. Nonboe, M. T. Sorensen, and E. M. Straarup A Diet Rich in Conjugated Linoleic Acid and Butter Increases Lipid Peroxidation but Does Not Affect Atherosclerotic, Inflammatory, or Diabetic Risk Markers in Healthy Young Men J. Nutr., March 1, 2008; 138(3): 509 - 514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. D Whigham, A. C Watras, and D. A Schoeller Efficacy of conjugated linoleic acid for reducing fat mass: a meta-analysis in humans Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2007; 85(5): 1203 - 1211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||