| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vascular Biology |
From CARIM (A.B., M.A.M.J.Z., B.J.S., T.M.H., B.H.G.J.S.-S., A.B., L.H., J.P.M.C., A.D., M.J.P.), University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Cardiology (M.B.S., D.P.V.d.K.), University Hospital Utrecht, The Netherlands; Angiogenesis Research Center (E.D.d.M.), Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH.
Correspondence to Alexandra Buehler, Johnson & Johnson, Janssen pharmaceutica n.v., Turnhoutseweg 30, B-2340 Beerse, Belgium. E-mail abuehler{at}prdbe.jnj.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results CD13/APN induction and cNGR homing were studied in the murine myocardial infarction (MI) model. By real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) at 7 days after MI, CD13/APN expression was 10- to 20-fold higher in the angiogenic infarct border zone and the MI area than in non-MI areas. In vivo fluorescence microscopy confirmed specific homing of fluorophore-tagged cNGR to the border zone and MI territory at 4 and 7 days after MI with a local advantage of 2.3, but not at 1 or 14 days after MI. Tissue residence half-life was 9.1±0.3 hours, whereas the half-life in plasma was 15.4±3.4 minutes. Pulse chase experiments confirmed reversible binding of cNGR in the infarct area. Fluorescent labeled cNGR conjugates or antibodies were injected in vivo, and their distribution was studied ex vivo by 2-photon laser scanning microscopy (TPLSM). cNGR co-localized exclusively with CD13/APN and the endothelial marker CD31 on vessels.
Conclusions In cardiac angiogenesis endothelial CD13/APN is upregulated. It can be targeted specifically with cNGR conjugates. In the heart cNGR binds its endothelial target only in angiogenic areas.
In murine myocardial infarcts we show that the cell surface marker CD13/APN (aminopeptidase N) is selectively upregulated on angiogenic endothelium. Using in vivo fluorescence imaging and ex vivo 2-photon scanning electron microscopy, we show that angiogenic CD13/APN can be targeted and imaged specifically with the synthetic targeting peptide cNGR.
Key Words: aminopeptidase N angiogenesis molecular imaging NGR vascular biology
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Molecular imaging, ie, using targeting antibody or nonantibody ligands to molecular markers is emerging as a useful technique that may provide the necessary sensitivity while also providing insight into the disease mechanisms.2,3 A critical component of molecular targeting is the identification of a marker, for instance angiogenic or "activated" endothelium. Novel markers of angiogenic endothelium and their ligands have been identified by differential phage display experiments in tumor models. Two peptide motifs, NGR (Asn-Gly-Arg) and RGD, have been shown to home specifically to tumor vessels in tumor xenograft bearing mice.4 NGR had a 3-fold higher homing efficacy than RGD, and it showed the greatest tumor selectivity of all peptides that were tested.4 In addition NGR conjugated doxorubicin, tumor necrosis factor-
, and pro-apoptotic peptides, had a greater anti-tumor effect than uncoupled drugs, probably because of local concentration.46 The vascular address for NGR has been identified as CD13/APN (aminopeptidase N, henceforth named CD13), a membrane bound glycoprotein that functions as an extracellular aminopeptidase.7 Antibodies against CD13 inhibited tumor-homing of NGR phage, whereas cells overexpressing CD13 bind the NGR phage specifically. CD13 is mainly expressed on tumor endothelium and new vessels in the corpus luteum, but not on quiescent vessels.7 In accordance, CD13 is transcriptionally activated by multiple angiogenic signals and appears to regulate angiogenesis in in vitro models.8,9 The expression of CD13 in adult ischemic tissues undergoing active neovascularization has not been studied yet.
In the current study, we aimed to investigate the utility of CD13 as a vascular address for targeted imaging of angiogenic vessels in the ischemic heart using cyclic NGR (cNGR) conjugates labeled with 2 different fluorescent tags (Oregon Green and Quantum dots [Qd]). Qd enhance the fluorescent signal and are very stable. We used the well-characterized angiogenic marker CD105 as a positive control. First, we studied the expression of CD13 in the angiogenic border zone of mouse cardiac infarcts. Using 2 complementary optical imaging methods, in vivo fluorescence imaging and ex vivo 2-photon laser scanning microscopy (TPLSM), we were further documented specific homing of cNGR conjugates to CD13 on the newly formed vasculature in infarcted myocardium.
Vascular addresses as targets for molecular contrasts can serve as prognosticators and tools to monitor therapy in postmyocardial infarct remodeling including angiogenesis.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All animal studies were approved by the Animal Welfare Committee of the University of Maastricht. Animals were handled in accordance with the American Physiological Society guidelines for animal welfare and the Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the United States National Institutes of Health.
Murine Myocardial Infarction
Myocardial infarction (MI) was induced in 10- to 12-week-old male Swiss mice by ligation of the left coronary artery, as previously described.10 The wound healing response leads to angiogenesis in the border zone (BZ) and in the infarct area (IA). The IA could clearly be distinguished morphologically and the BZ was the area between the infarcted and the still viable myocardium. Sham surgery consisted of the same procedure without tying the ligature.
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
CD13 expression in the border zone (BZ) and in the infarct area (IA) was assayed quantitatively by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). To measure the CD13 mRNA content, hearts were harvested at 4 days, 7 days, or 14 days after MI or sham surgery (n=6 to 7). Quantities were determined by comparison with known quantities of cloned CD13 and 18S PCR products.
In Vivo Fluorescence Microscopy
Myocardial infarction or sham procedures in the mouse were performed as described earlier11 One, 4, 7, and 14 days after MI, cNGR-OG488 binding to the infarct zone was studied using in vivo fluorescence imaging (n=2 to 5). Unconjugated OG488 was used as a control. Probes were injected before imaging through an indwelling catheter in the left jugular vein and were allowed to recirculate for 3 hours. Seven days after MI the pharmacokinetic properties of molecular contrast were determined by fluorescent imaging at 15 minutes, and 6, 12, and 24 hours after injection of 30 µg cNGR-OG488 or 12.5 µg OG488 in 150 µL PBS (n=3 per time point, and per probe). Reversibility of cNGR binding was studied in a separate washout study in which a 20-fold excess of unlabeled cNGR was given 15 minutes after injection of the cNGR-OG488 (n=3). No further postprocessing of images was performed. Mean fluorescence intensity (FI) after 15 minutes was set at 100% and local advantage (the ratio of target and background concentration of the fluorescent label) was calculated as the ratio of target to background concentration (right ventricle or atrium) of the fluorescent label.
TTC Protocol
After in vivo image acquisition the hearts were excised, frozen at 20°C for 15 minutes and subsequently cut into 1.5-mm-thick slices. To determine the infarction area and relate it to the area of contrast labeling, slices were incubated in 1.5% triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) (Sigma; T8877) in PBS at 37°C for 20 minutes. Brightfield and fluorescent images were taken and areas of necrosis and of fluorescent labeling were determined as percentage of the total area.
2-Photon Laser Scanning Microscopy
To assess intra-myocardial localization of CD13 expression, and cNGR binding after intravenous administration, we applied 2-photon laser scanning microscopy (TPLSM)14 to intact excised heart tissue that was not treated with TTC. Seven days after either sham (n=5) or MI (n=16) surgery the probe (or probe combination) was injected intravenously and allowed to circulate for 10 minutes. Subsequently, the animals were euthanized, the hearts harvested and separated in BZ and IA, nonrisk area (NRA), and right ventricle (RV), washed in saline, and embedded in agarose gel (1% in PBS). Both monovalent cNGR-OG488 (60 µg in 150 µL ie, 50 nanomoles/mouse) and multivalent cNGR-QD (120 picomoles/mouse) were studied, either alone or in combination. Cell-nuclei were identified by additional staining of excised tissue with Syto44 (blue, 0.5 µmol/L,
em=470 nm; Molecular Probes, Eugene, Ore). Eosin was used to visualize connective tissue and myocytes (purple, 0.25 µmol/L,
em=540 nm; Molecular Probes, Eugene, Ore), and anti-CD11b-PE was used for macrophage, neutrophil, and eosinophil staining (red, 10 µmol/L,
em=580 nm; Pharmingen, San Diego, Calif).
Statistical Analyses
All data are represented as mean±standard error of the mean (SEM). Differences between groups were analyzed with either ANOVA with Dunns post hoc analysis or a Kruskal Wallis (real-time PCR data). A P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CD13 Is Preferentially Expressed in the Angiogenic Area After MI
By real-time PCR, CD13 mRNA expression was significantly upregulated in the IA and BZ, but not in other areas of the infarcted heart and the sham operated hearts (Figure 1). CD13 mRNA expression in IA and BZ peaked at 7 days after MI with a significant 10- to 20-fold increase, confirming that CD13 is induced in MI.
|
In Vivo Homing of cNGR to the Infarct Region
To study the homing of intravenously administered cNGR, in vivo fluorescence microscopy was applied 7 days after MI, at the peak of CD13 expression in the BZ and IA. Monovalent cNGR-OG488 showed a rapid and unequivocal above background fluorescence in the target areas that could not be detected in other myocardial regions or sham-operated animals (Figure 2A). FI peaked at 15 minutes after injection and this FI was taken as 100% (SD=14%, P<0.001 compared with background FI, n=7). At 12 hours, FI was still significantly elevated (17.8±1.2%, P<0.05), but at 24 hours fluorescence had decreased to background levels of 2±2% (Figure 2B). Sham operated hearts showed non-specific binding (eg, FI of 8.7±0.4% in LV, n=3). Likewise, untargeted OG488 did not bind in infarcted hearts (FI of 7.8±1.5% in IA, n=3). Applying single-order kinetics, the residence half time (T1/2) of cNGR-OG488 in the infarct area was 9.1±0.3 hours. Chase experiments with a 20-fold excess of unlabeled cNGR (n=3), showed rapid displacement of cNGR-OG488 and a decrease in T1/2 down to 1.3±0.2 hours, strongly suggesting reversible binding of cNGR. The plasma T1/2 of cNGR-OG488 in plasma (please see http://atvb.ahajournals.org) was 15±3 minutes and 7.7±0.9 minutes for untargeted OG488. Rapid clearance of the conjugate from the blood stream is in accordance with its small size and predominant clearance by the kidneys2 as attested by fluorescence in the bladder (not shown).
|
In accordance with the CD13 expression data, specific binding of the cNGR conjugated label to the infarct zone was enhanced at 4 and 7 days after induction of the infarct (Figure 3A), but not at 1 or 14 days. The local advantage of the cNGR probe was 2.28±0.14 at 4 days after MI and 2.26±0.3 at 7 days after MI. Fourteen days after MI an advantage of 1.37±0.49 was observed, which was similar to unconjugated OG488 at 1.33±0.08.
|
These results show that at 4 and 7 days after MI cNGR specifically targets to the BZ and IA. However, the limited resolution of in vivo fluorescence microscopy did not allow visualization of the exact target of cNGR at the cellular level.
Macroscopic Targeting to the Target Area
To study the relation between the necrotic area and cNGR labeling we compared macroscopic fluorescent labeling with TTC staining for the 4- and 7-day specimens. TTC staining did not influence the fluorescent intensity (data not shown). The areas showed an excellent match with a correlation coefficient of 1.01, R2=0.90, P<0.001 (Figure 3B).
TPLSM: Cellular Localization of cNGR After In Vivo Injection
TPLSM was used to identify the cellular target of cNGR. Intravenous injection of OG488 (n=2) did not result in tissue staining, neither in the BZ and IA nor in the control areas (not shown). Likewise, in non-infarcted hearts or control tissues of infarcted hearts, we were unable to detect any cNGR binding after intravenous injection of cNGR, linked to OG488, QD525, or QD585 (n=3). Postmortem staining of tissue with eosin and Syto44 resulted in clear visualization of myocyte cytoplasm and cell-nuclei (of both myocytes and vascular cells; Figure 4A), respectively. After injection of anti-CD31-PE (n=2) networks of interconnected small vessels surrounding myocytes and networks of larger vessels were distinguishable (Figure 4B). Additional staining with Syto44 showed myocytes with one or more nuclei, surrounded by multiple capillaries (Figure 4C). After co-injection of anti-CD31-PE and anti-CD13-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), noninfarct heart tissue showed presence of endothelial CD31 in vascular patterns with occasional co-localization of CD13 at the cellular level (Figure 4D; please see http://atvb.ahajournals.org for a movie of these measurements). Subcellular co-localization was not always complete as judged by the absence of yellow hue typical of red and green overlay. This is in accordance with the predominant basolateral location of CD3112 and the apical location of CD13.
|
The findings in the IA and BZ are summarized in Figure 5. In these areas autofluorescence was prominent (n=4). Injection of cNGR-QD585, cNGR-QD525, or cNGR-OG488 (n=4) all resulted in similar labeling patterns, although fluorescence of QD was brighter and less bleachable than that of OG488. Furthermore, 2 hours after excision of the hearts, cNGR-OG488 fluorescence had disappeared, even in parts of the hearts that had not been illuminated before. In contrast, the fluorescence of cNGR-QD525 or cNGR-QD585 remained present for hours. This indicates more stable binding of QD to the tissue, probably attributable to the multivalency of QD. Because of the irregular pattern of fluorescent spots, the exact cellular location of the cNGR binding site could not be discerned. However, co-injection of anti-CD31-PE with cNGR conjugates revealed preferential localization of cNGR to endothelial cells of capillaries and larger vessels with an inner diameter up to 15 µm (Figure 5A and 5B). Although many such small vessels exhibit cNGR staining, we want to stress that not all do. CD13 presence on endothelium of small and large vessels was confirmed by double labeling with anti-CD13-FITC and anti-CD31-PE (n=2, Figure 5C). Whereas myocytes were scarce, anti-CD13FITC staining showed that CD13-positive macrophages were abundant. cNGR-OG488 did not stain these macrophages (data not shown). Injection of cNGR-QD585, immediately followed by injection with anti-CD13-FITC showed that cNGR binds only to a subset of CD13-positive endothelial cells (Figure 5D).
|
To test whether cNGR specifically binds to angiogenic endothelial cells, experiments using anti-CD105-FITC13 were performed, both in healthy (n=3) and infarcted (n=4) tissue. In noninfarcted tissue of both MI and healthy mice CD105 had low expression in the microvascular endothelium illustrated by co-localization with CD31 (Figure 5E). However, in IA or BZ tissue, CD105 expression was much higher (Figure 5F) and also present in larger vessels. Co-labeling of CD105 (FITC) with cNGR (QD585) showed strong co-localization of both probes in IA and BZ (Figure 5G). In control tissue of MI mice only CD105 was stained, with staining pattern similar as in Figure 5E. cNGR staining was not observed (not shown).
In summary, intravenously injected cNGR binds specifically to the endothelium of small vessels in the BZ and IA and not in normal myocardium. cNGR specifically targets cells that overexpress CD105, ie, endothelial cells that are actively involved in angiogenesis.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous immunohistochemical studies show that CD13 is preferentially expressed on angiogenic vessels in tumor bearing mice and on vessels in human cancer samples.7,14 In this study we extended these observations to ischemia and inflammation driven neovascularization in the heart. We established that CD13 is expressed in the infarct area and border zone by real-time PCR. No CD13 upregulation was observed in non risk areas, in accordance with earlier findings that adaptation of capillary microstructure fails to occur in viable tissues after MI.15 As a next step, we took advantage of optical sectioning, high-resolution (0.5x0.5x1 µm) and large penetration depth of TPLSM to obtain a more comprehensive picture of CD13 distribution on angiogenic and quiescent vessels in this model.16 Indeed, TPLSM allowed us to generate 3D- images of the vasculature in the target areas (see supplemental data).17 By combining multiple probes in vivo and with additional staining ex vivo, we were able to show that CD13 is expressed on vessels in healthy myocardium, and is abundantly present on endothelium of capillaries and larger vessels in infarct areas and their border zones. In accordance to the known expression pattern of CD13 we also found CD13 labeling on macrophages.18 Remarkably, however, cNGR binding was limited to endothelial CD13 in angiogenic infarct and border zone areas, based on co-localization with CD105 and CD31 and absence of binding to CD13-positive vessels in the healthy myocardium. Also, cNGR bound preferentially (±70%) to vessels with an inner diameter below 15 µm and not to larger CD13 was positive vessels. It has been suggested that cNGR targets a subset of posttranslationally modified CD13 that might be specific to smaller and perhaps newly formed vessels. For instance, earlier work in human tumor specimens indicated that different antigenic forms of CD13 were expressed on normal epithelial cells in the brush border of renal proximal tubules and vascular endothelium in renal carcinoma, and that cNGR only bound to tumor vessels.14 The observed co-localization with CD105 suggests that cNGR binds to activated, not quiescent, endothelium
RGD is another known tripeptide that labels activated endothelium by binding to the integrin
vß3. Several studies in different angiogenic vascular beds have been performed using an RGD conjugated contrast agent. Both radiolabeled RGD in a canine MI model19 and magnetic resonance-focused paramagnetic-tagged RGD in a mouse tumor model20 have been used to image neovascularization noninvasively in vivo.
In phage display selective for tumor vessels, both NGR and RGD were found to bind to these vessels.4 However, competition studies with NGR and RGD phage showed that they both home to different targets in tumor endothelium, and that the homing ratio (tumor/control organ) for NGR was 3-fold greater than for RGD.4 We therefore chose to pursue the NGR peptide and used the cyclic form that has a 10-fold greater targeting efficacy than linear modalities.21
In this study we used a monovalent contrast label, OG488, and a multivalent label, Quantum Dots. QD are decorated with up to 20 cNGR moieties and have a higher intrinsic fluorescence energy with lower bleaching rates than OG-488. Multivalent targeting particles have been proposed to bind with higher avidity than a monovalent homing peptide.22 In accordance with these observations, we were more successful with Quantum Dots than with cNGR-OG488 to show robust differences between CD13-poor and CD13-rich cells. Also in vivo, the QD probes displayed greater signal intensity and longer persistence of fluorescence than cNGR-OG488, despite >400-fold lower dose. Conjugating QDs to gadolinium renders them useful in magnetic resonance imaging.20 Hence, we show that QD decorated with peptide homing sequences are a useful tool for obtaining proof of principle targeted optical imaging. In the near future cNGR-binding to angiogenic vessels might be shown noninvasively by conjugating cNGR to either radioprobes or paramagnetic particles such as gadolinium.
The ultimate goal is to translate this principle into a clinical imaging technique such as MRI. By combining targeted vascular imaging with cNGR-labeled magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents and perfusion-sensitive imaging techniques that we have developed,23 we will be able to acquire signals from the neovasculature in combination with measurements of myocardial perfusion, cardiac function, and extent of myocardial scar. The biggest challenge is to concentrate sufficient label at the target to boost the inherently low signal to noise ratio of magnetic resonance imaging.3 QDs might be a useful tool to achieve this.
Thus, we show that, in the heart, CD13 is preferentially upregulated in angiogenic areas, and that it can be targeted effectively with monovalent and multivalent cNGR conjugates. Importantly, we demonstrate that the homing sequence binds its endothelial target only in angiogenic areas of the heart, and for the first time to our knowledge we show co-localization of a peptide homing sequence with its target after injection in vivo. Nanoparticles decorated with cNGR are effective optical imaging agents, and in a translational step can be further developed into particles for targeted magnetic resonance imaging of vessel growth and targeted delivery of agents that stimulate this process. The concept of treating and monitoring therapeutic effect at the same target holds great promise for the development of clinically successful strategies that promote new vessel growth.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
This study was supported from a grant from the Dutch Heart Foundation (NHS 2001-B047) and by the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands (ICIN 33) and the Dutch Scientific Organization (NWO 902-16-276).
Disclosures
None.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Original received May 29, 2006; final version accepted August 28, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Allen TM. Ligand-targeted therapeutics in anticancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002; 2: 750763.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Weissleder R, Mahmood U. Molecular imaging. Radiology. 2001; 219: 316333.
4. Arap W, Pasqualini R, Ruoslahti E. Cancer treatment by targeted drug delivery to tumor vasculature in a mouse model. Science. 1998; 279: 377380.
5. Curnis F, Sacchi A, Borgna L, Magni F, Gasparri A, Corti A. Enhancement of tumor necrosis factor alpha antitumor immunotherapeutic properties by targeted delivery to aminopeptidase N (CD13). Nat Biotechnol. 2000; 18: 11851190.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Ellerby HM, Arap W, Ellerby LM, Kain R, Andrusiak R, Rio GD, Krajewski S, Lombardo CR, Rao R, Ruoslathi E, Bredesen DE, Pasqualini R. Anti-cancer activity of targeted pro-apoptotic peptides. Nat Med. 1999; 5: 10321038.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Pasqualini R, Koivunen E, Kain R, Lahdenranta J, Sakamoto M, Stryhn A, Ashmun RA, Shapiro LH, Arap W, Ruoslathi E. Aminopeptidase N is a receptor for tumor-homing peptides and a target for inhibiting angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 2000; 60: 722727.
8. Bhagwat SV, Lahdenranta J, Giordano R. CD13/APN is activated by angiogenic signals and is essential for capillary tube formation. Blood. 2001; 97: 652659.
9. Bhagwat SV, Petrovic N, Okamoto Y, Shapiro LH. The angiogenic regulator CD13/APN is a transcriptional target of Ras signaling pathways in endothelial morphogenesis. Blood. 2003; 101: 18181826.
10. Lutgens E, Daemen MJ, de Muinck ED, Debets J, Leenders P, Smits JF. Chronic myocardial infarction in the mouse: cardiac structural and functional changes. Cardiovasc Res. 1999; 41: 586593.
11. Dumont EA, Reutelingsperger CP, Smits JF, Daemen MJ, Doevedans PA, Wellens HJ, Hofstra L. Real-time imaging of apoptotic cell-membrane changes at the single-cell level in the beating murine heart. Nat Med. 2001; 7: 13521355.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Bazzoni G, Dejana E. Endothelial cell-to-cell junctions: molecular organization and role in vascular homeostasis. Physiol Rev. 2004; 84: 869901.
13. Duff SE, Li C, Garland JM, Kumar S. CD105 is important for angiogenesis: evidence and potential applications. Faseb J. 2003; 17: 984992.
14. Curnis F, Arrigoni G, Sacchi A, Fischetti L, Arap W, Pasqualini R, Corti A. Differential binding of drugs containing the NGR motif to CD13 isoforms in tumor vessels, epithelia, and myeloid cells. Cancer Res. 2002; 62: 867874.
15. Anversa P, Loud AV, Levicky V, Guideri G. Left ventricular failure induced by myocardial infarction. II. Tissue morphometry. Am J Physiology. 1985; 248 (6Pt2): H883H889.
16. van Zandvoort M, Engels W, Douma K, Beckers L, Oude Egbrink M, Daemen M, Slaaf DW. Two-photon microscopy for imaging of the (atherosclerotic) vascular wall: a proof of concept study. J Vasc Res. 2004; 41: 5463.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. van Zandvoort MBA, Hackeng T, Engels W, Slaaf D, Post M, Shapiro L, de Muinck E. 3-D visualization of cardiac angiogenesis in wound healing after myocardial infarction (MI) by two-photon laser scanning microscopy (TPLSM). Paper presented at: Experimental Biology, 2004; San Fransisco, CA.
18. Hogg N HM. Myeloid antigens: new and previously defined clusters. In: AJ. MM, ed. Leukocyte Typing III: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Human Leukocyte Differentiation Antigens. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1987: 576621.
19. Meoli DF, Sadeghi MM, Krassilnikova S, Bourke BN, Giordano FJ, Dione DP, Su H, Edwards DS, Liu S, Harris TD, Madri JA, Zaret BL, Sinusas AJ. Noninvasive imaging of myocardial angiogenesis following experimental myocardial infarction. J Clin Invest. 2004; 113: 16841691.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Mulder WJ, Strijkers GJ, Habets JW, Bleeker EJ, van der Schaft DW, Storm G, Koning GA, Griffioen AW, Nicolay K. MR molecular imaging and fluorescence microscopy for identification of activated tumor endothelium using a bimodal lipidic nanoparticle. FASEB J. 2005; 19: 20082010. Epub Oct 4 2005.
21. Colombo G, Curnis F, De Mori GM, Gasparri A, Longoni C, Sacchi A, Longhi R, Corti A. Structure-activity relationships of linear and cyclic peptides containing the NGR tumor-homing motif. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277: 4789147897.
22. Hood JD, Bednarski M, Frausto R, Guccione S, Reisfeld RA, Xiang R, Cheresh DA. Tumor regression by targeted gene delivery to the neovasculature. Science. 2002; 296: 24042407.
23. Pearlman JD, Laham RJ, Simons M. Coronary angiogenesis: detection in vivo with MR imaging sensitive to collateral neocirculationpreliminary study in pigs. Radiology. 2000; 214: 801807.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Corti, F. Curnis, W. Arap, and R. Pasqualini The neovasculature homing motif NGR: more than meets the eye Blood, October 1, 2008; 112(7): 2628 - 2635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Oostendorp, K. Douma, T. M. Hackeng, A. Dirksen, M. J. Post, M. A.M.J. van Zandvoort, and W. H. Backes Quantitative Molecular Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Tumor Angiogenesis Using cNGR-Labeled Paramagnetic Quantum Dots Cancer Res., September 15, 2008; 68(18): 7676 - 7683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Curnis, A. Sacchi, A. Gasparri, R. Longhi, A. Bachi, C. Doglioni, C. Bordignon, C. Traversari, G.-P. Rizzardi, and A. Corti Isoaspartate-Glycine-Arginine: A New Tumor Vasculature-Targeting Motif Cancer Res., September 1, 2008; 68(17): 7073 - 7082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Mina-Osorio, B. Winnicka, C. O'Conor, C. L. Grant, L. K. Vogel, D. Rodriguez-Pinto, K. V. Holmes, E. Ortega, and L. H. Shapiro CD13 is a novel mediator of monocytic/endothelial cell adhesion J. Leukoc. Biol., August 1, 2008; 84(2): 448 - 459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |