| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brief Reviews |
From Université Louis Pasteur (O.M., F.T., B.H., B.B., J.-M.F.), Faculté de Médecine, Institut dHématologie et dImmunologie, Strasbourg, France; Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (O.M., B.B.), Fédération de Cardiologie, Strasbourg, France; INSERM (O.M., F.T., B.H., B.B., J.-M.F.), U.770, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Université Paris-Sud 11 (F.T.), Faculté de Médecine, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; INSERM (L.C.-J., F.D.-G.), U.608, Marseille, France; Université de la Méditerranée (L.C.-J., F.D.-G.), Faculté de Pharmacie, Marseille, France; Hôpital de la Conception (L.C.-J., F.D.-G.), Laboratoire dHématologie, Marseille, France.
Correspondence to Jean-Marie Freyssinet, Institut dHématologie et dImmunologie, Faculté de Médecine, 4, rue Kirschleger 67085 Strasbourg Cedex, France. E-mail Jean-Marie.Freyssinet{at}hemato-ulp.u-strasbg.fr
| Abstract |
|---|
Plasma membrane-derived microparticles are at the crossroad of atherothrombosis processes involving vascular inflammation, remodeling, endothelial dysfunction, and plaque thrombogenicity. After plaque disruption, trapped and circulating microparticles provide the concentration of tissue factor allowing blood coagulation to be triggered. The pharmacological modulation of microparticle release appears a promising preventive approach.
Key Words: microvesicles phosphatidylserine tissue factor
| Introduction |
|---|
| Membrane Remodeling and Vesiculation |
|---|
| The Hemostatic Balance at the MP Surface and Causes of Disruption |
|---|
200- and 1000-fold respectively.7 Additionally, PhtdSer considerably enhances the procoagulant activity of TF, the main cellular initiator of blood coagulation.
Circulating MPs in the Modulation of the Hemostatic Balance
Because of their plasma membrane reactivity, platelets constitute the main source of circulating procoagulant MPs under many pathophysiological situations,8 with leukocyte, erythrocyte, or endothelial lineages being other providers.1,2 MPs harbor functional membrane or cytoplasmic effectors (selectins, GPIIbIIIa, GPIb, von Willebrand factor, arachidonic acid, thromboxane A2, etc.) able to promote prothrombotic responses. When bearing appropriate counterligands, MPs can transfer their procoagulant potential to target cells. For instance, platelet-derived MPs (PMPs) can bind to soluble and immobilized fibrinogen, thus delivering procoagulant entities to the thrombus via the formation of aggregates.9 In vitro, interaction between endothelial MPs and monocytes promotes TF mRNA expression and TF-dependent procoagulant activity.10
At the MP surface, the presence of thrombomodulin, TF pathway inhibitor (TFPI)11 or protein C12 is indicative of possible MP contribution to anticoagulant pathways. Nevertheless, after lipopolysaccharide-treatment promoting TF expression, thrombomodulin activity at monocytes and derived-MP surfaces is overwhelmed by TF and prothrombinase activities.12 During fibrinolysis for myocardial infarction, a reduced TFPI expression at the MP surface was associated to TF-driven coagulation.11 Reactive oxygen species, highly expressed in cellMP aggregates, may contribute to TFPI inactivation and to the de-encryption of TF activity.13 When expressed at the MP surface, TF activity would thus prevail as a result of insufficient anticoagulant counterbalance.
Another mechanism worth considering in the thrombo-resistance at the endothelial and monocyte MP surfaces involves activated protein C pathway.14 Activated protein C has been reported to promote the shedding of endothelial and monocyte MPs through protease activated receptor-1 and endothelial protein C receptor-dependent mechanisms. Such MPs harbor functional endothelial protein C receptor, protected from metalloproteinase cleavage, and display anticoagulant ability toward factor Va inactivation.14
Circulating MPs and Blood-Borne TF
The long-standing dogma that TF is a constitutive protein expressed in minute amounts, switching the procoagulant properties of the endothelium toward the initiation of a clotting TF-driven process when upregulated, was recently challenged by the description of a reservoir of circulating TF spread by MPs.15 Termed blood-borne TF, it can be trapped within the developing thrombus through CD15, CD18, and TF-dependent interactions.15 The cellular origin of blood-borne TF is still debated, most likely varying with the pathophysiologic context. Under resting conditions, blood-borne TF was mainly harbored by PMPs,8 whereas monocyte-derived MPs could be expected important providers after stimulation by lipopolysaccharide.16 The absence of TF mRNA in megakaryocytes raises the question of TF transfer to platelets. Multiple fusions and exchanges between monocyte, endothelial, and platelet plasma or MP membranes have been considered.1719 Polynuclear leukocytes constitute another controversial source of blood-borne TF evidenced by MP labeling, which does not exclude fusion or phagocytosis events between cell lineages.20,21 The contribution of endothelial-derived MPs (EMPs) to blood-borne TF appears limited in the absence of stimulation, its importance being evoked under circumstances of drastic endothelial activation.10,22,23 Leukocyte-derived MPs and EMPs were also demonstrated to induce TF expression by monocytes endothelial cells.10,24,25
The debate remains as to whether TF exposed at the MP surface is a major factor for MP thrombogenicity,26,27 TF encryption/de-encryption being a probable crucial step. A circulating alternatively spliced form of TF was proposed to account for thrombogenicity.28 However, its clinical relevance remains to be established since representing only a small proportion of active blood-borne TF.29
MicroparticleSelectin Interactions in the Growing Thrombus
During the past decade, selectins, MPs, and TF have merged into a determining triad in thrombosis.30,31 P-selectin, an adhesion molecule expressed at platelet and endothelial cell surfaces, is necessary for TF accumulation and leukocyte incorporation into the thrombus after endothelial injury.32 The interactions between P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (PSGL-1) and platelet P-selectin were proved necessary to concentrate TF activity at the thrombus edge. The accumulation of hematopoietic cell-derived TF in the developing thrombus correlates with the kinetics of MPs accumulation before the leukocytethrombus interaction.33 In a murine model of hemophilia A, soluble P-selectin (sP-selectin) was demonstrated to promote the shedding of leukocyte-derived TF+-MPs, most likely from monocytes, that correct hemostasis.34 MPs plasma levels increase with age, except in PSGL-1null mice, indicating the contribution of the P-selectin/PSGL-1 pathway. Moreover, in mice engineered to express a several-fold elevation in sP-selectin plasma concentrations, unusual procoagulant potency and elevated proportions of circulating leukocyte-derived MPs harboring TF were evidenced.35,36
Other mechanisms triggered by P-selectin could contribute to increased thrombotic propensity. P-selectin was shown to favor the transfer of TF sorted from raft into monocyte-derived MPs and delivered as a functional entity to platelets.37 P-selectin also promotes PhtdSer exposure by monocytes and TF expression.7,38
MPs and Stabilization of the Thrombus: Role in Stasis
TF+-MPs recruited through P-selectin interactions may stabilize the thrombus by inducing fibrin formation.39 Because P-selectinPSGL-1 interactions usually mediate unstable rolling, additional cytoadhesins such as MAC-1, a ß integrin on leukocyte TF+-MPs, could contribute to thrombus stabilization.36 EMPs exposing unusually large von Willebrand multimers would promote the formation of platelet aggregates with increased stability.40
The contribution of blood-borne TF to the thrombotic process could be crucial in ischemia or stasis. Stasis would limit the dilution of recruited MPs, blood-borne TF becoming determinant even at sites of limited injury. In engineered mice presenting high levels of leukocyte-derived MPs and submitted to ischemia, P-selectin is upregulated at the endothelium surface suggesting increased MPs recruitment leading to the formation of larger thrombi observed in deep vein.41,42 In patients with venous thromboembolism, a marked activation of endothelium, platelets and leukocytes could be demonstrated through combined measurements of EMPs (harboring E-selectin and CD31), EMPsmonocytes conjugates, P-selectin expression, and plateletleukocytes aggregates.43
| Procoagulant MPs in Immune-Mediated Thrombosis |
|---|
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a common cause of drug-related immune-mediated thrombocytopenia known to favor thrombotic diathesis. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia patients develop antibodies against circulating heparin-platelet factor-4 (PF4) complexes, leading to platelets cross-linking and activation. Released PMPs expose GPIb, GPIIbIIIa, P-selectin, and thrombospondin and were found highly thrombogenic with the potency to trigger the activation of the coagulation system.45 PMPs would additionally bind to the subendothelial matrix, thus promoting the recruitment of additional platelet complexes and the constitution of a PMPs reservoir.46
| Procoagulant MPs in Atherothrombosis |
|---|
Regulation of MP Clearance Within the Plaque
Apoptotic cells and MPs are cleared by phagocytes in order to prevent (tissue) inflammatory responses. This dogma of a clean death was challenged by the demonstration of Fas-mediated activation of several inflammatory genes during apoptosis. Little is known on the clearance of apoptotic bodies within the plaque. Phagocytosis could be blunted or saturated by oxidized LDL, an abundant pro-atherogenic component of LDL cholesterol, able to interfere in the recognition of MPs phosphatidylcholine moities by macrophage scavenger receptors. Indeed, continuous infusion of lysophosphatidylcholine was shown to impair apoptotic clearance in mice.52 In turn, apoptotic bodies could promote macrophage apoptosis and enhanced MPs shedding.53 Apoptotic cells recruited to atherosclerotic plaques thus represent a reservoir of highly thrombogenic material, including derived MPs, made accessible to the blood stream in case of spontaneous or mechanical disruption.51
Possible Contribution of Lesion-Bound MPs to Plaque Vulnerability
Several mechanisms involving MPs from the plaque could account for instability, as suggested by in vitro data. MP would mediate the recruitment of inflammatory cells within the plaque. Endothelial-derived MPs released on VEGF or FGF2 stimulation harbor functional matrix metalloproteinases possibly favoring fibrous cap proteolysis.54 In the course of plaque remodeling, MPs of various origin could modulate angiogenesis, a key determinant of plaque vulnerability.55 PMPs, possibly incorporated within the plaque after local engulfment of a thrombus could promote angiogenesis,56 whereas EMPs could enhance oxidative stress leading to apoptosis.57 In addition, PMPs are providers of active NADPH oxidase involved in reactive oxygen species -mediated endothelial or SMC apoptosis.58 Furthermore, apoptotic lymphocyte-derived MPs could impede endothelial nitric oxide (NO) synthesis by downregulating NO synthase expression, leading to endothelial apoptosis.59
Respective Contribution of Vessel Wall TF and Blood-borne TF to the Growing Thrombus
After erosion or rupture, plaque-bound TF was long considered sufficient to initiate thrombus formation. While certainly accurate at a microscopic level, the role assigned to this sequestered form of TF is not physically realistic at a macroscopic scale considering the rapid growth of a thrombus. The diffusion of procoagulant intermediates would be completed within hours and even more, owing to obstruction by adherent platelets and fibrin deposition on the damaged surface.60 To decipher the respective contribution of circulating or sequestered TF+-MPs in thrombus development, reciprocal bone marrow transplants were performed between wild-type and engineered mice expressing minimal TF. Results suggest that whereas arterial vessel-wall TF is involved in the initiation of platelet activation, blood-borne TF spread by MPs mediates thrombus propagation.61 Once vessel wall TF is covered by a layer of fibrin and platelets, the plaque might become impermeable to circulating clotting factors. Thus, blood-borne TF would prevail in puncture wounds or venous thrombosis, its contribution being less effective in the presence of high amounts of plaque TF.39,61,62
The MP Reservoir Contributes to the Amplification of the Thrombotic Response
Because TF+-MPs are the main thrombogenic components of the atherosclerotic plaque, spontaneous or mechanical disruption during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) could lead to procoagulant MPs release. The exposure of the subendothelium could in turn enhance platelet activation and MPs shedding. PCI therefore constitutes a relevant model to understand the contribution of MPs to thrombotic processes. A peak of circulating PMPs was reported 8 hours after PCI, occurring in parallel with the fall of the platelet count.63 Ex vivo, plaque disruption by scraping led to the release of TF+-MPs. Indeed, intracoronary samples retrieved after angioplasty from distal protection devices exhibited TF+-MPs.5 Because circulating white blood cells are unable to upregulate TF before 96 hours after PCI,64 membrane-bound TF would mainly originate from the ruptured plaque.5 Indeed, we could evidence a significant raise of procoagulant MPs across the tightest lesions assessed by intravascular ultrasound (unpublished data). Sequestration of TF+-MPs within the myocardial microvasculature could contribute to the no-reflow phenomenon. Active membrane-bound TF shed from dissected plaques is elevated in patients presenting profound impairment of myocardial perfusion. Likewise, perfusion of the porcine coronary beds with membrane-bound TF induced no-reflow and positive TF staining in the microvasculature obstructed by fibrin thrombi.5 In addition to their procoagulant properties, MPs could contribute to the drastic reduction of myocardial perfusion through multiple and intricate pathways: (1) impairment of coronary flow through NO synthase pathway59; (2) enhancement of inflammatory response and oxidative stress25; and (3) recruitment of leukocytes through PMP rolling.65 Other amplification loops might be triggered during atherothrombosis. PMPs release has previously been reported under a variety of conditions including collagen or thrombin stimulation, shear66 or oxidative stress67 conditions, elevated plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1),68 P-selectin,34 or CD40L69 plasma concentrations.
MPs in the Development of Atherothrombosis
Several studies point at MPs of various origins as effectors of vascular wall inflammation.1,2 MPs upregulate cytokine expression in monocytes and endothelium,25,66 promote leukocyteleukocyte aggregation and recruitment through P-selectin.70 In turn, leukocyte-derived MPs would stimulate interleukin (IL)-6 and MCP-1 endothelial release and TF expression trough a JNK1 signaling pathway.24,25 Under conditions of oxidative stress, endothelial-derived MPs contain oxidized phospholipids that promote monocyteendothelial interactions.71 PMPs are able to upregulate cytoadhesion expression in monocytes and endothelial cells through the delivery of arachidonic acid, thus reinforcing cell adhesiveness.72 As providers of proinflammatory IL-1ß,73 PMPs also contribute to endothelial inflammation. At high shear stress, PMPs GPIb and P-selectindependent rolling would enable delivery of RANTES, a CC chemokine, to the inflamed endothelium65,74 and favor monocyte adhesion. Interestingly, PMPs would thus contribute to the atherosclerotic plaque development through P-selectin or RANTES mediation in cells of arterial or microvascular origin but might be ineffective in the inflamed venous bed, as reported in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs).74 Most of the experiments aimed at examining the effects of circulating MPs using in vitro models were carefully performed, with relevant controls. In some circumstances, it cannot be excluded that contamination with pyrogenic material may have led to overestimation of their deleterious role.
| Circulating MPs and Vascular Dysfunction |
|---|
|
MPs shed under pathological situations exhibit multiple abilities in the dysregulation of vascular tone, whereas MPs from healthy volunteers were ineffective on normal isolated vessels.7578 Indeed, PMPs are a source of thromboxane A2, a potent regulator of vascular tone, as shown in rabbit aorta.79,80 In addition, MPs from apoptotic T lymphocytes impair endothelium-dependent relaxation, independently of CD11a-CD18 or FasFasL pathways.59 Impairment was linked to endothelial nitric oxide synthetic (eNOS) downregulation and caveolin-1 overexpression. Endothelial dysfunction was also targeted by MPs from rat FasL-mediated apoptotic SMCs that diminished NO production. The effect, mediated by endothelial ß3 integrins, was sensitive to abciximab or eptifibatide.81
EMPs from rat renal microvasculature alter endothelium-dependent relaxation and NO production in the aorta, an effect related to superoxide anion production.78 In patients with end-stage renal failure, EMPs levels were found correlated with the loss of flow-mediated dilation and increased aortic pulse wave velocity, whereas PMPs were not correlated with vascular dysfunction. EMPs, possibly released on uremic toxins accumulation, were confirmed as reducers of NO release.75,82 In patients with coronary artery disease, circulating EMPs appeared a reliable parameter in the identification of high-risk patients. Endothelial-dependent vasodilation closely correlated with the degree of CD31+-MPs shed by apoptotic endothelial cells.83 In diabetes, EMPs bearing vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin appear the most significant risk factor for coronary heart disease with respect to well-known markers of atherothrombosis.84
Altogether, these results point at EMPs not only as a surrogate marker of endothelial dysfunction or injury but also as effectors able to amplify a pre-existing vascular dysfunction. Conversely, in inflammatory diseases, circulating MPs of lymphocytic origin could promote ex vivo vascular hyporeactivity through the release of vasodilatory factors from SMCs. The recruitment of such MPs into the aorta media was confirmed in mice injected with human CD4+ lymphocyte-derived MPs. In this paracrine pathway, FasFasL interactions between lymphocyte-derived MPs and targeted SMCs seemed mandatory and involved NF-
B. Hyporeactivity was characterized by NO and PGI2 production, prompted by the up-regulation of inducible NO synthase and COX-2.85
| Angiogenesis and MPs |
|---|
MPs cellular origin, concentration, and sequential recruitment might determine the magnitude of the angiogenic signal (Table 2). For instance, MPs isolated from HUVECs and applied at low concentrations promoted angiogenesis, whereas high concentrations produced an opposite response.54 At physiological concentrations, EMPs showed no pro-angiogenic effect whereas pathological concentrations (
100-fold enhancement) impaired angiogenesis and enhanced the apoptotic rate.57 In human and rodent endothelial cells, the oxidative stress induced by EMPs appeared as a key actor in the balance governing angiogenesis and apoptosis.57,78 Future pharmacological strategies aimed at modulating circulating EMP levels or composition could prove useful in pathological issues where abnormalities of neovascularization prevail.
|
| Circulating MPs: Effectors in the Tuning of Thrombotic Propensity Associated With Cardiovascular Risk |
|---|
Healthy Individuals
In the peripheral blood of healthy subjects, low levels of MPs are detected. A typical Western meal is nevertheless able to increase blood-borne TF and circulating levels of EMPs, the latter being tightly correlated with triglyceride levels.90,91 Mean levels of circulating MPs appear stable in adulthood, whereas a
2-fold elevation is characteristic of childhood.92 This observation does not weaken MPs as reliable markers of the thrombotic risk but rather testifies to massive cell and tissue remodeling in child development. In young healthy men, subclinical inflammation assessed by IL-6 plasma levels was associated to circulating CD31+-MPs as a possible result of increased endothelial apoptosis.93
Diabetes Mellitus
In diabetes, a wide panel of blood or vascular cells, including platelets, endothelial cells, monocytes, and islets of Langerhans, release MPs.18,94 Shedding is triggered by a variety of cytokines or stimuli, such as tumor necrosis factor-
, IL-1ß, soluble CD40L, advanced glycation end products, oxidative stress, and hyperglycemia.95 MPs phenotype and procoagulant potential may vary according to the type of diabetes or glycemic control.18,27 Indeed, high procoagulant activity borne by circulating MPs was detected in patients with poorly controlled HbA1c levels.18 EMPs and PMPs appear particularly elevated in type 1 patients,18 the highest EMPs levels being detected in patients with microvascular complications. In type 2 diabetes, high levels of monocyte- or platelet-derived MPs were reported indicative of nephropathy and retinopathy.96,97 During acute myocardial infarction, the raise in platelet-, endothelial-, and monocyte-derived MPs contributes to enhanced thrombogenicity, regardless of the diabetes type.98,99
Hypertension
Platelets and endothelial cells become activated during hypertension and are possible actors in the development of a thrombotic response through the release of procoagulant MPs. High levels of circulating MPs, from platelet, monocytic, or endothelial lineages, were observed in patients with hypertension, EMP being features of both systolic and diastolic pressures.100,101 Apart from neurohormonal stimulation, physiological (230 sec1)102 or supra physiological shear rates (1500 to 10 800 sec1)66 would per se promote platelet activation and the release of MPs able to induce a proadhesive phenotype on target endothelial cells.66 Altogether, MPs could be viewed pathogenic effectors of organ injury in severe hypertension.
Dyslipidemia
Altered MPs patterns have been reported in patients with hyperlipidemia. On oxidation or aggregation, LDL were demonstrated potent inducers of membrane blebbing.50 Differences in plasma selectins, platelet-, monocyte-, and/or endothelial-derived MPs were pointed at in hyperlipemic patients, the highest values being observed in those combining 3 major cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipemia).103105
MPs: A Marker of Vascular Damage
In asymptomatic subjects, leukocyte-derived MPs were recently demonstrated an independent marker of preclinical carotid atherosclerosis, still informative after adjustment for Framingham risk, waist circumference, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.106 First results in myocardial infarction107,108 were recently confirmed in a larger multicentric international study109 reporting procoagulant MPs of better value in mortality prognosis than usual biological markers. It is therefore tempting to consider circulating MPs relevant indicators of the overall vascular status in the assessment of the individual atherothrombotic risk.
| Pharmacological Modulation of Circulating MPs |
|---|
|
Statins
Several observations suggest that MPs can be targeted by statin treatment. In vitro, fluvastatin was reported to inhibit EMPs shedding, partly through Rho small GTPases, key regulators in cytoskeleton remodeling.110 In vivo, GPIIbIIIa sorting was diminished in PMPs from patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated by pravastatin.111 Circulating monocyte-derived MPs were reduced in hypertensive patients treated by a combination of losartan and simvastatin.112
GPIIbIIIa Antagonists and Other Anti-platelet Treatments
Various anti-platelet treatments, such as GIIbIIIa antagonists and thienopyridines, lower circulating PMP levels. Within a given pharmacological class, the potency may vary. For instance, the specific inhibition of PMPs release by abciximab was reported higher than by eptifibatide, whereas the reduction of shear stress-induced aggregation was found similar.113 Specific inhibition of P-selectin proteolytic shedding at high shear stress or sensitivity to steric hindrance because of abciximab binding were suggested as possible mechanisms.114 The pharmacological reduction of circulating PMPs was associated to diminished leukocyte MPs levels108,115 and reduced release of soluble cytoadhesins vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and intercellular adhesion molecule-1,116 suggesting a weakened transcellular activation.
Other Candidates in the Pharmacological Control of MP Release
Several signaling pathways are associated with membrane shedding and are therefore possible targets for a pharmacological control. Oxidative stress, cytokines, and neuro-hormonal stimulation (angiotensin II, catecholamines) promote MPs release. A more ubiquitous target would be any specific or occasional PhtdSer membrane translocator such as ABCA1,117 modulating membrane remodeling, and subsequent blebbing and MPs shedding.118
MPs in the Treatment of Bleeding Disorders
In bleeding disorders, the procoagulant potential spread by MPs could be of therapeutic benefit. In hemophilic mice, bleeding correction was achieved by procoagulant leukocyte-derived MPs generated through soluble P-selectin infusion.34 In hemophiliacs, part of the procoagulant potential of recombinant FVIIa could rely on the endogenous generation of procoagulant PMPs.119 Upregulation of endogenous reservoirs of procoagulant MPs could also provide new insights in the treatment of acquired (thrombocytopenia) or congenital bleeding disorders.
| Conclusion |
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
This work was partly supported by a fellowship from OPAL-Atherothrombose awarded to O.M., by a fellowship from the Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale awarded to B. Bakouboula, and institutional grants from the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, the Université Louis Pasteur Strasbourg, the Université Paris-Sud 11, The Université de la Méditerrannée, and the Agence Nationale pour la cecherche (ANR-05-PCOD-24-01).
Disclosures
None.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|