Editorials |
From the Department of Pathology, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Colchester.
Correspondence to Nancy Swords Jenny, PhD, Department of Pathology, University of Vermont College of Medicine, 208 South Park Drive, Suite 2, Colchester, VT 05446. E-mail Nancy.Jenny{at}uvm.edu
Inflammation is clearly recognized as a central component in the development and progression of cardiovascular disease (CVD). What is not clear, however, is how to best identify and monitor pathophysiologic inflammatory processes leading to acute coronary events. Many studies have focused on the potential of circulating biomarkers of inflammation to define risk of incident CVD events and morbidity and mortality following events.
See pages 2517 and 2523
Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) holds promise as a biomarker specifically associated with several key aspects of atherogenesis. Lp-PLA2, also known as platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase (PAF-AH), is an enzyme produced primarily by macrophages and lymphocytes.1 Although Lp-PLA2 has been reported to exhibit both pro- and antiinflammatory activities, its primary role appears to be proatherogenic. In this context, Lp-PLA2 hydrolyzes oxidized phospholipids such as those within oxidized LDL, generating proinflammatory moieties lysophosphatidylcholine and oxidized fatty acids.1 In addition, approximately 80% of circulating Lp-PLA2 is sequestered on LDL particles which serve to modulate enzyme activity.1 Enzyme activity is reported to be increased when Lp-PLA2 bound to more atherogenic small dense LDL versus larger particles.2
In this issue of Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, Kolodgie and colleagues3 and Gerber and colleagues4 provide important new evidence on the role of Lp-PLA2 in atherosclerosis development and prognostic value of this novel biomarker after myocardial infarction (MI). In an immunohistochemical study of Lp-PLA2 expression in coronary segments from 25 sudden coronary death patients, Kolodgie et al3 found strong expression of Lp-PLA2 within the necrotic core and in macrophages, notably apoptotic macrophages, surrounding vulnerable and ruptured plaques. There was minimal expression of Lp-PLA2, primarily in the lipid pool, detected in less advanced lesions. Localization of Lp-PLA2 to the lipid-rich necrotic core of developing and advanced lesions likely reflects its key role in lipid hydrolysis. Products of this activity attract circulating monocytes and participate in macrophage activation. Further supporting a causal role of Lp-PLA2 in atherosclerosis, fibrous cap thickness was determined in part by macrophage infiltration.3 In addition, Lp-PLA2 was associated with apoptotic macrophages and macrophage apoptosis, in turn correlated with expansion of the lipid core. These findings suggest that Lp-PLA2 may be both a specific marker and causal mediator of plaque progression and instability. The study by Kolodgie et al3 is therefore important in elucidating the numerous complex processes within the vessel wall which underlie the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Understanding these processes is a key step in reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with CVD.
The potential causal role of Lp-PLA2 in atherosclerosis is of even greater interest given the findings of Gerber et al4 who examined the potential role of Lp-PLA2 in defining risk of adverse outcomes after MI. In a community-based study of 271 patients with acute MI, high Lp-PLA2 levels at the time of event were strongly and independently associated with mortality over one year of follow-up. Survival estimates (95% confidence intervals) were 92% (68% to 98%), 85% (78% to 93%), and 74% (65% to 84%) for the lowest, middle, and upper tertiles of Lp-PLA2. Compared with the lowest tertile, hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for death in the middle and upper tertiles of Lp-PLA2 were 2.2 (0.9 to 5.5) and 4.8 (2.1 to 11.6) in models adjusted for age and sex. Associations were stronger when models were adjusted for additional risk factors. Lp-PLA2 also provided incremental predictive value over traditional risk factors and C-reactive protein. The study by Gerber et al4 extends and compliments previous findings. Several studies have reported associations between Lp-PLA2 and risk of developing CVD.59 Lp-PLA2 has also been associated with adverse events in patients with clinical CVD.1013 Combined with the novel information on the prognostic value of Lp-PLA2 after MI in the current study, these data support a role for Lp-PLA2 in risk stratification following major CVD events.
Although these studies highlight both potential causal and biomarker roles for Lp-PLA2 in atherosclerosis, there are still many questions to be resolved.14 Perhaps one of the most important is whether measurement of Lp-PLA2 antigen level or enzymatic activity provides the best reflection of ongoing atherosclerosis. Lp-PLA2 mass, but not activity, was associated with calcified coronary plaque in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study.5 This likely reflects the complex biology of Lp-PLA2 and of lipids and lipid-related moieties in general. Lp-PLA2 is considered to be predominantly proatherogenic; however, the enzyme may have antiinflammatory properties as well. Lp-PLA2 degrades platelet-activating factor (PAF) in vitro. Although similar activity has not been demonstrated in vivo, Lp-PLA2 cleavage of minimally modified LDL likely reduces the ability of LDL to promote monocyte chemotaxis and adhesion.1 In terms of proatherogenic activities, Lp-PLA2 degradation of oxidized LDL generates proinflammatory molecules and as oxidized phospholipids themselves may have antiinflammatory properties, Lp-PLA2 activity would nullify these properties.1 The complexity of this system is further illustrated by the distribution of circulating Lp-PLA2. 70% to 80% of the enzyme is associated with the apolipoprotein B moiety of LDL, in particular, with small dense LDL particles that are believed to be more proatherogenic and appear to increase Lp-PLA2 activity. The remaining 20% to 30% of Lp-PLA2 is bound to the phospholipid moiety of HDL. This association is not well characterized but may be antiinflammatory in nature.1 More mechanistic studies are needed to resolve the full range of Lp-PLA2 functionality and how these actions modulate the development and progression of atherosclerosis.
Given its potentially central role in atherosclerosis, the discovery of specific Lp-PLA2 inhibitors has rendered Lp-PLA2 a viable therapeutic target. In this context, a clinical threshold for Lp-PLA2 has recently been proposed.15 However, key questions remain to be answered in this arena as well.14 Statins lower Lp-PLA2 activity, presumably through reduction of LDL levels.16 What role would specific Lp-PLA2 inhibitors play in therapy? It is not known whether the recommended threshold for Lp-PLA2 activity can be achieved by current therapeutic regimens (ie, diet, exercise, statins) alone. Studies to date have focused primarily on Whites with limited data on other ethnic groups. Is the proposed clinical threshold relevant in all populations? Studies of Lp-PLA2 genetics will also provide interesting information. These and other questions await answers in future prospective epidemiologic and clinical research.Figure
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
None.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Articles:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. S. Sabatine, D. A. Morrow, M. O'Donoghue, K. A. Jablonksi, M. M. Rice, S. Solomon, Y. Rosenberg, M. J. Domanski, J. Hsia, and for the PEACE Investigators Prognostic Utility of Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 for Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., November 1, 2007; 27(11): 2463 - 2469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |