| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atherosclerosis and Lipoproteins |
From the School of Medicine (P.M.L.S., A.C., A.J.M.), Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK; Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology Unit (R.S., M.F., T.D.S., A.J.M.), Kings College, London, UK.
Correspondence to Paula Skidmore, School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich., NR4 7JT. E-mail p.skidmore{at}uea.ac.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Birth weights and fasting blood lipid levels were available for 2900 women aged 18 to 80 years. Individual level regressions indicated that a 1-kg increase in birth weight was associated with a 0.08-mmol/L decrease in total cholesterol (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12, 0.04) and a 0.06-mmol/L decrease in low-density lipoprotein (0.10, 0.03). Using a regression model that includes both mean twin pair birth weight and individual twins difference from the pair mean, we found that these significant relationships were between twin pairs only and not within pairs. We found no significant relationships for high-density lipoprotein. When monozygotic and dizygotic twins were analyzed separately we found similar effect sizes. Restricting the analysis to postmenopausal women we found stronger relationships between birth weight and lipid levels, which was attenuated after adjustment for body mass index (BMI).
Conclusions These novel results suggest that significant relationships between birth weight and lipids are mediated through shared influences on the maternal environment and do not support the hypothesis that fetal malnutrition is an important determinant of adult lipid levels. Adjustment for BMI also indicates that postnatal growth may be more important than prenatal growth.
In a cohort of 2900 female twins, we found that birth weight was inversely significantly related to total and LDL cholesterol, between twin pairs only and not within pairs. These findings indicate that the relationships between birth weight and lipids are mediated through shared influences on the maternal environment.
Key Words: birth weight environment epidemiology lipids twins
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
0.02 to 0.05 mmol/L.46 For other lipids the results have been inconsistent, partly accounted for by gender and age effects and interactions.4,6 The association between total cholesterol and birth weight is reported to be stronger for men than women; and the positive relationship between birth weight and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) is most apparent in postmenopausal women.7,8 Where associations have been shown between birth weight and lipids, it remains unclear whether these might be a direct effect of undernutrition or caused by confounding as a result of parental factors. The association may also be mediated by a shared genetic mechanism. These influences of birth weight, maternal environment, and genetic factors on lipid levels can be separated by studying twins. Twin pairs are naturally and uniquely matched for age, genetic factors, and a range of covariates in their shared environment. Examining lipid levels in the group overall provides an estimate of effect of birth weight. Studying within-pair differences in the twins provides a measure of the extent to which any association is caused by difference in fetal nutrition as opposed to confounding factors in the maternal environment. Comparing the degree of association in monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins gives an indication of the extent to which any putative association might be mediated genetically.
In this study we have examined the relationship between birth weight and adult lipid levels in a sample of adult female twins from the extensively characterized Twins UK Registry.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Twins included in this sample were female and between the ages of 18 and 80 years. All attended for clinical assessment at St Thomas Hospital between 1996 and 2000. Height was measured to the nearest 0.5 cm by using a wall-mounted stadiometer. Weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg using digital scales. A venous blood sample was also drawn after an overnight fast. For both twins of each pair, blood was taken 5 minutes apart. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the Quetelet index. At assessment twins completed a questionnaire detailing their medical history and lifestyle factors. Birth weight was recalled by participants. Medication history, including details of lipid-lowering medication, was coded according to the British National Formula (BNF) Number 40 (2000).
Laboratory Methods
Serum samples were stored at 40°C until analysis. Levels of all lipids were measured by using a Cobas Fara machine (Roche Diagnostics). Total cholesterol, HDL, and triglycerides were determined by a colorimetric enzymatic method. HDL cholesterol was determined after precipitation of larger particles (chylomicron, very-low-density lipoprotein, and low-density lipoprotein [LDL]) by magnesium and dextran sulfate. LDL levels were estimated by using the Friedewald equation. This formula was applied only if the triglyceride concentration of subjects did not exceed 4.52 mmol/L. Subjects with extremely high or low lipid values (3 SD above or below the mean) were excluded from the analyses.
Statistical Methods
Linear regression analysis was first undertaken treating the twins as individuals, allowing a direct comparison with findings in singleton populations:
|
|
where Yij and Xij, respectively, represent the lipid (Y) value and birth weight (X) of twin j from pair i. ßc represents expected change in lipid level per kg increase in birth weight in individuals. The regression analysis took into account the correlated structure of the data. Second, after the approach described in detail by Carlin et al,9 the effect of birth weight of each individual twin on lipid levels was examined in a model parameterized with birth weight included as: (a) a variable representing the mean birth weight of the pair from which the twin is derived; and (b) a variable representing the individual twins difference from the pair mean. This approach provides a simultaneous estimation of within-pair and between-pair influences of birth weight on lipid levels:
|
|
where Xi. is the mean value of X for twin pair i. The within-pair coefficient ßw gives the expected change in Y for 1-unit change in the difference between the individual X and the twin-pair average X value. The between-pair coefficient ßB gives the expected change in Y for a 1-unit change in the twin-pair average X, while holding the individual deviation from the average constant. The within-pair effect ßw represents an association that is free of confounding because of factors that are common to the twin pair. The between-pair effect ßB reflects further variation in Y that can be explained by variation in the twin-pair mean of X. Variation caused by confounding because of the maternal environment would be expected to be detected in ßB but not ßw.9
In the analysis, total cholesterol, HDL, and LDL were normally distributed. The triglyceride data were log-transformed to achieve a normal distribution. The regression analyses were performed in MZ and then DZ twins separately, with adjustment for age, and where no significant differences existed between zygosity groups the data were pooled. To investigate the effect of postnatal effects, we examined a sequence of models including: (1) BMI; (2) height; and (3) BMI and height together. The latter model takes into account any residual confounding caused by size that is not accounted for by BMI. Because high lipoprotein levels may be more adverse in postmenopausal than premenopausal women,1012 we repeated the analysis only in those subjects aged 60 years and older. Four subjects who were taking cholesterol-lowering drugs were excluded from the study. All statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 9.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Total Cholesterol
The results from the individual level regression analysis showed a significant inverse relationship between total cholesterol and birth weight (0.08 mmol/L decrease in total cholesterol per 1-kg increase in birth weight). There were no differences in the magnitude of the relationship between MZ (0.08 mmol/L) and DZ twins (0.07 mmol/L). Total cholesterol was negatively associated with birth weight between twin pairs but not within pairs, ie, the association was mediated through an effect on the twin pair mean and did not account for individual differences from the pair mean in all analyses (Table 2). When the analyses were confined to all postmenopausal women twin pairs, the relationship between total cholesterol and birth weight was apparent after adjusting for age alone (Table 2). This relationship was also evident in MZ postmenopausal twin pairs. Although the relationship was not significant in postmenopausal DZ twins, the magnitude of the effect was similar to that observed in the MZ pairs.
|
LDL Cholesterol
The results for LDL cholesterol were similar to those for total cholesterol and indicated a significant inverse relationship between LDL cholesterol and birth weight (0.06 mmol/L decrease in total cholesterol per 1-kg increase in birth weight), which was observed in the individual level regression. There were no significant differences in the magnitude of the relationship between MZ (0.07 mmol/L) and DZ twins (0.05 mmol/L). This relationship was also observed between, but not within twin pairs (Table 3). When the analyses were restricted to all postmenopausal women twin pairs, the relationship was similar to that observed for total cholesterol. (Table 3).
|
HDL Cholesterol
There were no significant relationships between HDL cholesterol and birth weight, and no significant differences in the magnitude of the relationship between MZ and DZ twins (Table 4).
|
Triglyceride
Results from the individual level regression analysis indicate a significant inverse relationship between triglyceride and birth weight and the magnitude of this effect did not differ between MZ and DZ twins (Table 5). In the models allowing estimation of within-pair and between-pair differences, triglyceride was negatively associated with birth weight between twin pairs only in all twins (Table 5). In postmenopausal women, significant relationships were only observed after adjustment for age alone.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2-fold larger effect size than has been reported in recent meta-analyses, which estimated a decrease
0.02 to 0.05 mmol/L per 1kg increase in birth weight, although the confidence intervals were wide, because of reduced power compared with the meta-analysis46 However relationships of this size have been found, particularly in older female populations,4 and higher effect sizes are generally found in older women.4 The difference in effect size from the results found in meta-analyses may also reflect the impact in previous studies of various confounders (perhaps because of more diverse lifestyles of unrelated adults; or different parental influences) that may have obscured the true size of the association. While adjustment for most potential confounders may increase the size of the relationship, adjustment has also been shown to reduce the effect size in some female cohorts.4 Our results also suggest a stronger relationship between birth weight and total cholesterol after the menopause, although the effect was attenuated after adjustment for BMI. This small difference in effect size in the unadjusted analyses may be due to small cyclic variations in lipid levels in premenopausal and perimenopausal women.15,16 This suggests that it is high postmenopausal BMI that is responsible for adverse lipid levels, rather than lack of estrogen after menopause and would indicate that postnatal change in size, rather than fetal growth, is important.17
We also found a significant relationship between birth weight and current LDL levels, as would be expected, given the association with total cholesterol. Our analysis has the advantage of being based on fasting lipid levels. While significant relationships have been consistently observed between birth weight and total cholesterol levels in other studies, relationships with other lipid levels have generally only been reported in large-scale studies in which fasting lipid levels have been collected.7,1820
The use of the twin study design has allowed us uniquely to demonstrate that the associations between lipids levels and birth weight are mediated though a relationship with the mean birth weight of each pair and are not apparent in individual differences from the pair mean. This is consistent with the effect being related to factors in the uterine environment that are shared by the twins, for example, differences in the maternal hormone environment and other aspects of maternal health. As birth weight is a crude indicator of intrauterine nutrition, it would suggest that external confounding factors affecting maternal nutrition, such as socioeconomic status, smoking, alcohol, or exercise, rather then the processing of nutrients and in utero delivery of these is responsible. Our data also suggest that the relationship between birth weight and lipid levels is not mediated through genetic influences as a similar effect size in the relationship was found between MZ and DZ twins.
The potential underlying mechanism linking small birth size with adverse lipid levels in adult life remains unclear as shown by the influence on total cholesterol and LDL, but not HDL. Barker et al21 observed that small abdominal circumference, representing small liver size, was associated with subsequent higher levels of total and LDL cholesterol. As the liver regulates lipid metabolism, impaired in utero growth of the liver may program more adverse levels of total and LDL cholesterol, whereas relationships with HDL and triglycerides may in theory be mediated through genetic factors that influence insulin resistance.22 However, our results did not indicate such a genetic influence.
This is the only large-scale twin study to our knowledge to investigate the relationships between birth weight and subsequent lipid levels. Some common criticism of the twin design is that twins are not representative of the general population because they may have lower birth weights and lipid levels and intrauterine growth in twins may be different to that in singletons.23,24 However in this study, while birth weights were lower than for comparable singletons, lipid levels were similar to comparable singleton populations,13,14 including one female population of a similar age and sex distribution, drawn from the UK population.25 Our results also indicate that the size of associations in our sample are comparable to those of singleton populations. We used recalled birth weights, rather than more accurate prospective measures, but this would mask any associations, rather than enhance them.26
Although we found statistically significant negative relationships between birth weight and total cholesterol and LDL, these relationships are of such a small size that they are unlikely to be of any clinical significance. It is estimated that realistically achievable increases in birth weight would only be associated with a reduction of only 0.005 mmol/L of total cholesterol, which would have a negligible effect on coronary heart disease risk.27
In conclusion, this study conducted in a large sample of female twins, drawn from a representative population, has shown significant relationships between birth weight and total and LDL cholesterol. Our results suggest that these associations are mediated through shared influences on the maternal environment such as socioeconomic status, smoking, alcohol, or exercise, and do not support the hypothesis that fetal malnutrition is an important determinant of adult lipid levels.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This work was supported in part by The Wellcome Trust and The Chronic Diseases Research Foundation.
Disclosures
None.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |