Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2006;26:212-217
Published online before print November 3, 2005, doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000194099.65024.17
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
26/1/212    most recent
01.ATV.0000194099.65024.17v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sie, M. P.S.
Right arrow Articles by Witteman, J. C.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sie, M. P.S.
Right arrow Articles by Witteman, J. C.M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Growth factors/cytokines
Right arrow Acute coronary syndromes
Right arrow Acute myocardial infarction
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrow Genetics of cardiovascular disease
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2006;26:212.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.


Atherosclerosis and Lipoproteins

Interleukin 6 –174 G/C Promoter Polymorphism and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease

Results from the Rotterdam Study and a Meta-Analysis

Mark P.S. Sie; Fakhredin A. Sayed-Tabatabaei; Hok-Hay S. Oei; André G. Uitterlinden; Hubert A.P. Pols; Albert Hofman; Cornelia M. van Duijn; Jacqueline C.M. Witteman

From the Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (M.P.S.S., F.A.S.-T., H.-H.S.O., A.G.U., H.A.P.P., A.H., C.M.v.D., J.C.M.W.) and Internal Medicine (M.P.S.S., A.G.U., H.A.P.P.), Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Correspondence to J.C.M. Witteman, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail j.witteman{at}erasmusmc.nl


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Objective— Inflammation plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Interleukin (IL) 6 has many inflammatory functions, and the IL-6 –174 G/C promoter polymorphism appears to influence IL-6 levels. Findings of previous studies on the relation between this polymorphism and risk of cardiovascular diseases are inconsistent. We investigated this polymorphism in relation to risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) in a population-based study and meta-analysis.

Methods and Results— Participants (6434) of the Rotterdam Study were genotyped. Analyses on the relation between genotype and CHD were performed using Cox proportional hazards tests, and the association between genotype and plasma levels of IL-6 and C-reactive protein was investigated. All of the analyses were adjusted for age, sex, and common cardiovascular risk factors. A meta-analysis was performed, using a random effects model. No association between genotype and risk of CHD was observed. The polymorphism was not associated with IL-6 levels, but the C-allele was associated with higher C-reactive protein levels (P<0.01). Our meta-analysis did not show a significant association between the genotype and risk of CHD.

Conclusions— We conclude that the polymorphism is not a suitable genetic marker for increased risk of CHD in subjects ≥55 years of age.

Inflammation plays an important role in atherosclerosis. The association of the inflammatory interleukin 6 –174 G/C polymorphism and risk of coronary heart disease was investigated in a population-based study and additional meta-analysis. No association was found; we conclude the polymorphism is not a suitable marker for increased risk.


Key Words: coronary heart disease • inflammation • IL-6 • polymorphism


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Inflammatory processes play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis.1–4 Within the inflammatory pathway, cytokines fulfill a multitude of functions. Interleukin (IL) 6 is a pleiotropic inflammatory cytokine. It plays an important part in the acute-phase response and inflammatory cascade, such as upregulation of acute-phase proteins as C-reactive protein (CRP).5,6 CRP levels have been found to be associated with risk of coronary heart disease (CHD).7,8 Several studies have also shown an association between IL-6 plasma levels and cardiovascular pathology.9–17 Ridker et al12 found elevated IL-6 levels to be associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI). This finding was replicated in another large population by Bennet et al,15 who found an increased risk of MI for those in the upper quartile levels of IL-6 versus those in the lowest quartile levels, and by Cesari et al,10 when comparing subjects with highest and lowest IL-6 tertiles in an American population. Fishman et al18 detected a functional polymorphism (G->C) in the promoter region of the human IL-6 gene (174 bp upstream from the start site). This polymorphism appears to influence the transcription of the IL-6 gene and also plasma levels of IL-6, and IL-6 is, therefore, a candidate gene for additional study into its role in cardiovascular disease.18 However, results from previous studies on the –174 G/C polymorphism and CHD were inconsistent.15,19–26 Five studies, most of which were case-control studies, conducted in Western, mainly white, populations, found the C-allele to be associated with (an increased risk of) CHD or cardiovascular disease.21–24,26 Four other studies, however, did not find a significant association.15,19,20,25 We studied the IL-6 –174 G/C polymorphism in relation to risk of CHD in a large population–based study. Also, a meta-analysis was conducted including studies on this polymorphism and CHD.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Study Population
The Rotterdam Study is an ongoing prospective cohort study including 7983 participants of ≥55 years in age. Its general aims are to investigate determinants of chronic diseases.27 During the first phase of this study (1990–1993), all of the inhabitants of a Rotterdam suburban area (Ommoord) aged ≥55 years were invited to participate in this study. The response rate was 78%. Baseline investigations included an interview and visits to the research center, where a number of clinical measurements were performed. Approval of the Medical Ethics Committee of the Erasmus University in Rotterdam was obtained for the Rotterdam Study. From all of the participants, written informed consent was acquired. A more in-depth description of the Rotterdam Study was published previously.27

Clinical Characteristics
Trained investigators collected information using a computerized questionnaire during the home visits. The information included current health status, medical history, use of medication, and smoking behavior. During the 2 subsequent visits to the center, blood samples were obtained, and established cardiovascular risk factors were measured as described elsewhere.28 Hypertension was defined as a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of ≥160 mm Hg and/or a diastolic blood pressure of ≥100 mm Hg and/or use of antihypertensive medication (with indication hypertension). Diabetes mellitus (DM) was defined as a nonfasting serum glucose level of ≥11.1 mmol/L and/or use of antidiabetic medication. A 12-lead ECG was recorded and analyzed by the Modular ECG Analysis System.29 Evaluation of the atherosclerotic status of participants was accomplished using ultrasonography (carotid arteries), radiographic detection (aorta), and ankle-arm index (via blood pressure measurements); these methods have been extensively described previously.30

Measurement of IL-6 and CRP plasma levels
A venapuncture was performed by application of minimal stasis with a 21-gauge Butterfly needle with tube (Surflo winged infusion set, Terumo). Nonfasting blood was collected in tubes containing 0.129 mol/L sodium citrate at 4°C. The ratio of blood:sodium citrate was 9:1. Plasma was collected after centrifugation for 10 minutes at 3000 rpm. Subsequently, platelet-free plasma was obtained by centrifugation for 10 minutes at 10 000 rpm, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen (LN2), and stored at –20°C. All of the tubes were stored on ice before and after blood sampling. Levels of IL-6 were measured by using a commercially available ELISA (Quantikine HS from R&D Systems Europe). CRP was measured in samples stored at –20°C by sensitive immunologic methods based on rate near-infrared particle immunoassays (IMMAGE from Beckman Coulter Netherlands).

Genotyping
Genotyping of the IL-6 –174 G/C polymorphism was performed using samples stored earlier at –80°C. DNA was isolated using standard procedures. Genotypes were determined in 2-ng genomic DNA with the Taqman allelic discrimination assay (Applied Biosystems). Primer and probe sequences were optimized by using the single-nucleotide polymorphism assay-by-design service of Applied Biosystems (details available online at http://store.appliedbiosystems.com). Reactions were performed with the Taqman Prism 7900HT 384-wells format in 2 µL of reaction volume.

Follow-Up Procedures and Definition of Events
General practitioners (GPs) in the research district, with whom 85% of the participants of the Rotterdam Study were enlisted, reported fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events. Research assistants verified all of the information by checking medical records at the GP offices. All of the medical records of the participants under the care of GPs outside the study area were checked annually for possible events. Letters and, in case of hospitalization, discharge reports from medical specialists were obtained. With respect to the vital status of participants, information was also obtained regularly from the municipal health authorities in Rotterdam. After notification, the cause and circumstances of death were established by a questionnaire from the GPs. Two research physicians independently coded all of the reported events according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition.31 Codes on which the research physicians disagreed were discussed to reach consensus. Finally, a medical expert in cardiovascular disease, whose judgment was considered final, reviewed all of the events. CHD was defined (based on International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition) as the occurrence of an MI (I21), revascularization procedure (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass graft; Z95.5 and Z95.1), ischemic heart disease (I20 and I22 through I25), sudden cardiac death (I46), ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia (I49), congestive heart failure (I50), or sudden death undefined (R96) during follow-up. Sudden death was defined as death occurring instantaneously or within 1 hour after the onset of symptoms. Incident MI was defined as the occurrence of a fatal or nonfatal MI after the baseline examination.

Meta-Analysis
For the meta-analysis, published data were used from previously published studies, concerning the IL-6 –174 G/C polymorphism and CHD, until December 2004. In addition, our own data were also included. Studies were found with Pubmed/Medline using the following key words: IL-6, –174, polymorphism, cardiovascular disease, MI, and CHD and using references from retrieved articles. Eight studies were identified, of which 7 were included in the analysis.15,19–25 One study was excluded, because no genotype frequencies were available specified for cases and controls.23 All of the studies were conducted in European populations. As end point in the analyses, we used CHD, defined as the occurrence of an MI, revascularization procedure (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass graft), ischemic heart disease, (sudden) cardiac death, ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia, sudden death undefined, or congestive heart failure.

Statistical Analyses
Baseline characteristics were tested for differences between the genotypes using ANOVA analyses for continuous variables [age, body mass index (BMI), SBP, cholesterol levels, IL-6 levels, and CRP levels) and Pearson {chi}2 tests for discrete variables (sex, smoking, diabetic status, and history of MI). All of the values above mean plus 3 times the SD were excluded, as correction for outliers. Natural-log transformed values of IL-6 and CRP levels were used to normalize the distribution of these variables; presented data are back transformed. Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed to obtain relative risks. All of the analyses were adjusted for age and sex and, additionally, for BMI, SBP, high-density lipoprotein and total cholesterol levels, baseline smoking, and DM. Subjects with prevalent MI were excluded from the analyses. Additional analyses were performed in various age strata (10-year strata starting from 55 years, and above and below 75 years), in strata of sex, smoking, and DM, and in various strata of atherosclerosis (tertiles of aorta calcification and carotid plaques and ankle-arm index above and below 0.9). A P value of ≤0.05 was considered significant in all of the analyses. The statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 11 and S-Plus 6.0 for MS-Windows.

For the meta-analysis, the method of moments has been used to calculate the relative risks in a random-effects model for the pooled data.32 We used the funnel plots to examine publication bias of reported associations. The meta-analysis and heterogeneity analysis were performed using Review Manager 4.2.7 (RevMan Analyses version 1.0; Cochrane Collaboration–Wintertree Software Inc).


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Rotterdam Study Results
Genotyping of the IL-6 –174 G/C polymorphism was successfully performed in 6434 subjects. The main characteristics of the study population are summarized in Table 1 (2612 male and 3822 female). Mean age was 69.5 (±9.1) years. There were 2301 participants (36%) with the GG genotype (wild-type), 3050 (47%) with the GC genotype, and 1083 (17%) with the CC genotype. Genotype and allele proportions were in Hardy Weinberg equilibrium (P=0.18).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Baseline Characteristics

IL-6 plasma levels were determined in a random subgroup of 641 subjects after exclusion of outliers (2%). No significant difference in mean IL-6 plasma levels between the genotypes was observed (Figure 1). CRP plasma levels were successfully determined in 5924 cases after exclusion of outliers (1%). The level of CRP was significantly higher in CC (P<0.01) and GC (P<0.01) individuals as compared with the individuals with the wild-type genotype GG (Figure 1). The C-allele was significantly associated with higher CRP levels (P<0.01).



View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. *Significantly different from GG (P<0.01). {dagger}Significantly different from GG (P<0.01).

During a mean follow-up period of 6.8 (± 2.3) years, there were 648 cases of CHD and 280 cases of MI. After exclusion of patients with previous MI, there were 463 newly diagnosed cases of CHD and 208 cases of incident MI.

There was no significant difference in relative risk of CHD or MI when comparing the GC or CC genotypes and C-allele carriership with the –174 GG wild-type genotype, although there appeared to be a slightly but not significantly increased risk for the subjects with the GC and CC genotype (Table 2). Adjusting for age, BMI, SBP, total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, smoking, and DM did not alter these results.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Risk of CHD and MI by IL-6 Genotype

No difference in survival and event-free survival was found among the genotypes CC, GC, and GG for CHD in men (P=0.36) or women (P=0.79). There was also no difference in survival between the genotypes for MI in men (P=0.81) or women (P=0.63). Additional adjustment for covariates did not alter these findings. No significant associations between the –174 genotype and the risk of CHD or MI were observed in strata of age, smoking, diabetic status, and levels of atherosclerosis (data not shown).

Meta-Analysis Results
In the meta-analysis were a total of 13 434 C-allele carriers of whom 36% (n=4799) were CHD cases and 6364 subjects with the wild-type GG genotype of whom 33% (n=2128) were CHD cases. The meta-analysis did not show a significant association between the polymorphism and CHD. Subjects with the CC genotype compared with individuals with the GG genotype had a relative risk of 1.03 (95% CI, 0.92 to 1.16; P=0.59). Also when carriers of the C-allele were compared with the GG genotype, there was no significant difference in risk, 1.12 (95% CI, 0.97 to 1.29; P=0.12; Figure 2). There was evidence for heterogeneity (P=0.003). This was caused by the study of Licastro et al,24 which was an outlier with a very high odds ratio (Figures 2 and 3Down). We did not exclude this study, because the exclusion would only shift the nonsignificant results further toward the null value and would not lead to a significant difference in the overall outcome.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Meta-analysis of CHD risk for carriers of the C-allele vs the GG genotype.



View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Meta-analysis funnel plot.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In this prospective population–based study, no significant association between the IL-6 –174 G/C genotype and CHD or MI was found, nor was there an association with plasma levels of IL-6. A higher CRP level was found among subjects with the C-allele. Adjusting for possible confounders and analyses in various substrata did not alter these findings. A meta-analysis, including our own study, showed no significant association between the genotype and risk of CHD.

Our study is based on a large, ongoing population–based study in a relatively homogeneous population, because 98% of the participants in our study are white and are all living in the same area, a suburb of Rotterdam. In contrast to case control studies, the prospective nature of our study makes our results less prone to survival bias. We adjusted all of the analyses for established risk factors, but this did not change the estimates.

Results from previous studies on this IL-6 –174 G/C polymorphism and CHD were inconsistent (Table I, available online at http://atvb.ahajournals.org).15,19–26 In the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health (LURIC) cohort and several other studies, no association between this polymorphism and CHD was found.15,19,20,25 Other studies, such as the Étude Cas-Temoins de l’Infarctus du Myocarde (ECTIM) Study and a study based on the CHS cohort, found a higher risk of CHD associated with the C-allele.21–24,26 All of the studies on IL-6 genotype and CHD were performed in Western populations with predominantly male subjects with an average age of ≥50 years. It is, therefore, unlikely that differences in findings are because of ethnicity, gender, or age differences between the studies.

To provide a better overview of (inconsistent) findings of various studies, we also studied the association between the IL-6 genotype and the risk of CHD by performing a meta-analysis, which made it possible to study a very large number of events. This meta-analysis also did not show an association between the genotype and risk of CHD. Publication bias is always an important potential source of bias in meta-analyses. However, studies have been published both with positive and negative findings on the association between the polymorphism and the risk of CHD, and the funnel plot does not suggest a strong publication bias.

There is also no consensus on the effect of the genotype on plasma levels of IL-6 and CRP.14,15,19–21,23,25,26 The C-allele in our study was significantly associated with higher CRP levels. In most studies showing an effect of the C-allele on plasma levels, the C-allele was associated with higher plasma levels of both IL-6 and CRP.20,21,26,33 This is pathophysiologically plausible, because CRP is produced in the liver, and IL-6 is a hepatocyte stimulant, so elevated IL-6 levels will result in higher CRP levels. However, IL-6 has been described to be too unstable in time (plasma half-life of <2 hours) to be measured precisely.34,35 In addition, there was a limited sample size of IL-6 levels. Given the short half-life, larger numbers would have been needed to detect a relatively small difference in IL-6 levels. This might explain the lack of association between the genotype and IL-6 plasma levels in our study.

In our study, we did not find a clear association between genotype and risk of CHD. This may be related to the fact that the functionality of the polymorphism, at least with respect to the extent of the influence on IL-6 plasma levels, has not been definitively established. Although an effect on transcription and IL-6 levels was described, the view presented by Terry et al,36 whereby the effect is cell-specific and dependent on complex interactions between several polymorphisms, rather then on an individual polymorphism, might be more applicable.18,33 This implies that the solitary –174 G/C genotype might influence plasma levels but not in a substantial way.

There is evidence for the IL-6 –174 G/C polymorphism to be in linkage disequilibrium with other functional but less frequently investigated polymorphisms, such as –597 G/A and –572 G/C, and with possibly functional polymorphisms in the –373 AT run.37–42 Because of this linkage disequilibrium, these polymorphisms were not considered in our analyses, as analyzing these would provide similar information.

In conclusion, we did not find a significant relation between the IL-6 promoter polymorphism –174 G/C and risk of CHD. Based on our analyses and results from our meta-analysis, we conclude that the polymorphism does not have a prominent role in the pathogenesis of CHD and is, therefore, not a suitable genetic marker for increased risk of CHD.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, grant 904-61-196. We thank all who contributed to the Rotterdam Study, either as participant or professional, and, in addition, P.P. Arp for his contributions to the actual genotyping.

Received May 12, 2005; accepted October 14, 2005.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Ross R. Atherosclerosis–an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340: 115–126.[Free Full Text]
  2. Libby P, Ridker PM, Maseri A. Inflammation and atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2002; 105: 1135–1143.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Plutzky J. Inflammatory pathways in atherosclerosis and acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol. 2001; 88: 10K–15K.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Ross R. Atherosclerosis is an inflammatory disease. Am Heart J. 1999; 138: S419–S420.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Yudkin JS, Stehouwer CD, Emeis JJ, Coppack SW. C-reactive protein in healthy subjects: associations with obesity, insulin resistance, and endothelial dysfunction: a potential role for cytokines originating from adipose tissue? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999; 19: 972–978.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Nabata T, Morimoto S, Koh E, Shiraishi T, Ogihara T. Interleukin-6 stimulates c-myc expression and proliferation of cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. Biochem Int. 1990; 20: 445–453.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Danesh J, Wheeler J, Hirschfield G, Eda S, Eiriksdottir G, Rumley A, Lowe G, Pepys M, Gudnason V. C-reactive protein and other circulating markers of inflammation in the prediction of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350: 1387–1397.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Danesh J, Whincup P, Walker M, Lennon L, Thomson A, Appleby P, Gallimore JR, Pepys MB. Low grade inflammation and coronary heart disease: prospective study and updated meta-analyses. Bmj. 2000; 321: 199–204.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Biasucci LM, Vitelli A, Liuzzo G, Altamura S, Caligiuri G, Monaco C, Rebuzzi AG, Ciliberto G, Maseri A. Elevated levels of interleukin-6 in unstable angina. Circulation. 1996; 94: 874–877.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Cesari M, Penninx BW, Newman AB, Kritchevsky SB, Nicklas BJ, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Rubin SM, Ding J, Simonsick EM, Harris TB, Pahor M. Inflammatory markers and onset of cardiovascular events: results from the Health ABC study. Circulation. 2003; 108: 2317–2322.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Rundek T, Elkind MS, Pittman J, Boden-Albala B, Martin S, Humphries SE, Juo SH, Sacco RL. Carotid intima-media thickness is associated with allelic variants of stromelysin-1, interleukin-6, and hepatic lipase genes: the Northern Manhattan Prospective Cohort Study. Stroke. 2002; 33: 1420–1423.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Stampfer MJ, Hennekens CH. Plasma concentration of interleukin-6 and the risk of future myocardial infarction among apparently healthy men. Circulation. 2000; 101: 1767–1772.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Burzotta F, Iacoviello L, Di Castelnuovo A, Glieca F, Luciani N, Zamparelli R, Schiavello R, Donati MB, Maseri A, Possati G, Andreotti F. Relation of the -174 G/C polymorphism of interleukin-6 to interleukin-6 plasma levels and to length of hospitalization after surgical coronary revascularization. Am J Cardiol. 2001; 88: 1125–1128.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Bennermo M, Held C, Green F, Strandberg LE, Ericsson CG, Hansson LO, Watkins H, Hamsten A, Tornvall P. Prognostic value of plasma interleukin-6 concentrations and the -174 G > C and -572 G > C promoter polymorphisms of the interleukin-6 gene in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis. Atherosclerosis. 2004; 174: 157–163.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Bennet AM, Prince JA, Fei GZ, Lyrenas L, Huang Y, Wiman B, Frostegard J, Faire U. Interleukin-6 serum levels and genotypes influence the risk for myocardial infarction. Atherosclerosis. 2003; 171: 359–367.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Biasucci LM, Liuzzo G, Fantuzzi G, Caligiuri G, Rebuzzi AG, Ginnetti F, Dinarello CA, Maseri A. Increasing levels of interleukin (IL)-1Ra and IL-6 during the first 2 days of hospitalization in unstable angina are associated with increased risk of in-hospital coronary events. Circulation. 1999; 99: 2079–2084.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Jones KG, Brull DJ, Brown LC, Sian M, Greenhalgh RM, Humphries SE, Powell JT. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and the prognosis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Circulation. 2001; 103: 2260–2265.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Fishman D, Faulds G, Jeffery R, Mohamed-Ali V, Yudkin JS, Humphries S, Woo P. The effect of novel polymorphisms in the interleukin-6 (IL-6) gene on IL-6 transcription and plasma IL-6 levels, and an association with systemic-onset juvenile chronic arthritis. J Clin Invest. 1998; 102: 1369–1376.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Nauck M, Winkelmann BR, Hoffmann MM, Bohm BO, Wieland H, Marz W. The interleukin-6 G(-174)C promoter polymorphism in the LURIC cohort: no association with plasma interleukin-6, coronary artery disease, and myocardial infarction. J Mol Med. 2002; 80: 507–513.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Basso F, Lowe GD, Rumley A, McMahon AD, Humphries SE. Interleukin-6–174G>C polymorphism and risk of coronary heart disease in West of Scotland coronary prevention study (WOSCOPS). Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002; 22: 599–604.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Humphries SE, Luong LA, Ogg MS, Hawe E, Miller GJ. The interleukin-6–174 G/C promoter polymorphism is associated with risk of coronary heart disease and systolic blood pressure in healthy men. Eur Heart J. 2001; 22: 2243–2252.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Georges JL, Loukaci V, Poirier O, Evans A, Luc G, Arveiler D, Ruidavets JB, Cambien F, Tiret L. Interleukin-6 gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to myocardial infarction: the ECTIM study. Etude Cas-Temoin de l’Infarctus du Myocarde. J Mol Med. 2001; 79: 300–305.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Jenny NS, Tracy RP, Ogg MS, Luong le A, Kuller LH, Arnold AM, Sharrett AR, Humphries SE. In the elderly, interleukin-6 plasma levels and the -174G>C polymorphism are associated with the development of cardiovascular disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002; 22: 2066–2071.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Licastro F, Chiappelli M, Caldarera CM, Tampieri C, Nanni S, Gallina M, Branzi A. The concomitant presence of polymorphic alleles of interleukin-1beta, interleukin-6 and apolipoprotein E is associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction in elderly men. Results from a pilot study. Mech Ageing Dev. 2004; 125: 575–579.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Lieb W, Pavlik R, Erdmann J, Mayer B, Holmer SR, Fischer M, Baessler A, Hengstenberg C, Loewel H, Doering A, Riegger GA, Schunkert H. No association of interleukin-6 gene polymorphism (-174 G/C) with myocardial infarction or traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Int J Cardiol. 2004; 97: 205–212.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Bruunsgaard H, Christiansen L, Pedersen AN, Schroll M, Jorgensen T, Pedersen BK. The IL-6–174G>C polymorphism is associated with cardiovascular diseases and mortality in 80-year-old humans. Exp Gerontol. 2004; 39: 255–261.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Hofman A, Grobbee DE, de Jong PT, van den Ouweland FA. Determinants of disease and disability in the elderly: the Rotterdam Elderly Study. Eur J Epidemiol. 1991; 7: 403–422.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Bots ML, Hoes AW, Koudstaal PJ, Hofman A, Grobbee DE. Common carotid intima-media thickness and risk of stroke and myocardial infarction: the Rotterdam Study. Circulation. 1997; 96: 1432–1437.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Van Bemmel JH, Kors JA, van Herpen G. Methodology of the modular ECG analysis system MEANS. Methods Inf Med. 1990; 29: 346–353.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Van Der Meer IM, De Maat MP, Hak AE, Kiliaan AJ, Del Sol AI, Van Der Kuip DA, Nijhuis RL, Hofman A, Witteman JC. C-reactive protein predicts progression of atherosclerosis measured at various sites in the arterial tree: the Rotterdam Study. Stroke. 2002; 33: 2750–2755.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. World Health Organization. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1992.
  32. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986; 7: 177–188.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Vickers MA, Green FR, Terry C, Mayosi BM, Julier C, Lathrop M, Ratcliffe PJ, Watkins HC, Keavney B. Genotype at a promoter polymorphism of the interleukin-6 gene is associated with baseline levels of plasma C-reactive protein. Cardiovasc Res. 2002; 53: 1029–1034.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Riches P, Gooding R, Millar BC, Rowbottom AW. Influence of collection and separation of blood samples on plasma IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-alpha concentrations. J Immunol Methods. 1992; 153: 125–131.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Waage A, Brandtzaeg P, Halstensen A, Kierulf P, Espevik T. The complex pattern of cytokines in serum from patients with meningococcal septic shock. Association between interleukin 6, interleukin 1, and fatal outcome. J Exp Med. 1989; 169: 333–338.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Terry CF, Loukaci V, Green FR. Cooperative influence of genetic polymorphisms on interleukin 6 transcriptional regulation. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 18138–18144.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Jerrard-Dunne P, Sitzer M, Risley P, Buehler A, von Kegler S, Markus HS. Inflammatory gene load is associated with enhanced inflammation and early carotid atherosclerosis in smokers. Stroke. 2004; 35: 2438–2443.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Park BL, Lee HS, Kim YJ, Kim JY, Jung JH, Kim LH, Shin HD. Association between interleukin 6 promoter variants and chronic hepatitis B progression. Exp Mol Med. 2003; 35: 76–82.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Ferrari SL, Karasik D, Liu J, Karamohamed S, Herbert AG, Cupples LA, Kiel DP. Interactions of interleukin-6 promoter polymorphisms with dietary and lifestyle factors and their association with bone mass in men and women from the Framingham Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res. 2004; 19: 552–559.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Zhang Z, Liu W, Jia X, Gao Y, Hemminki K, Lindholm B. Use of pyrosequencing to detect clinically relevant polymorphisms of genes in basal cell carcinoma. Clin Chim Acta. 2004; 342: 137–143.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Festa F, Kumar R, Sanyal S, Unden B, Nordfors L, Lindholm B, Snellman E, Schalling M, Forsti A, Hemminki K. Basal cell carcinoma and variants in genes coding for immune response, DNA repair, folate and iron metabolism. Mutat Res. 2005; 574: 105–111.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Kelberman D, Fife M, Rockman MV, Brull DJ, Woo P, Humphries SE. Analysis of common IL-6 promoter SNP variants and the AnTn tract in humans and primates and effects on plasma IL-6 levels following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004; 1688: 160–167.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
R. M. Fleming and G. M. Harrington
What Is the Relationship Between Myocardial Perfusion Imaging and Coronary Artery Disease Risk Factors and Markers of Inflammation?
Angiology, March 1, 2008; 59(1): 16 - 25.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. Qi, C. Zhang, R. M. van Dam, and F. B. Hu
Interleukin-6 Genetic Variability and Adiposity: Associations in Two Prospective Cohorts and Systematic Review in 26,944 Individuals
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2007; 92(9): 3618 - 3625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
E. E. Ntzani, E. C. Rizos, and J. P. A. Ioannidis
Genetic Effects versus Bias for Candidate Polymorphisms in Myocardial Infarction: Case Study and Overview of Large-Scale Evidence
Am. J. Epidemiol., May 1, 2007; 165(9): 973 - 984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. P.S. Sie, A. G. Uitterlinden, M. J. Bos, P. P. Arp, M. M.B Breteler, P. J. Koudstaal, H. A.P. Pols, A. Hofman, C. M. van Duijn, and J. C.M. Witteman
TGF-{beta}1 Polymorphisms and Risk of Myocardial Infarction and Stroke: The Rotterdam Study
Stroke, November 1, 2006; 37(11): 2667 - 2671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
26/1/212    most recent
01.ATV.0000194099.65024.17v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sie, M. P.S.
Right arrow Articles by Witteman, J. C.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sie, M. P.S.
Right arrow Articles by Witteman, J. C.M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Growth factors/cytokines
Right arrow Acute coronary syndromes
Right arrow Acute myocardial infarction
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrow Genetics of cardiovascular disease