Atherosclerosis and Lipoproteins |
From the Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (M.P.S.S., F.A.S.-T., H.-H.S.O., A.G.U., H.A.P.P., A.H., C.M.v.D., J.C.M.W.) and Internal Medicine (M.P.S.S., A.G.U., H.A.P.P.), Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Correspondence to J.C.M. Witteman, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail j.witteman{at}erasmusmc.nl
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Participants (6434) of the Rotterdam Study were genotyped. Analyses on the relation between genotype and CHD were performed using Cox proportional hazards tests, and the association between genotype and plasma levels of IL-6 and C-reactive protein was investigated. All of the analyses were adjusted for age, sex, and common cardiovascular risk factors. A meta-analysis was performed, using a random effects model. No association between genotype and risk of CHD was observed. The polymorphism was not associated with IL-6 levels, but the C-allele was associated with higher C-reactive protein levels (P<0.01). Our meta-analysis did not show a significant association between the genotype and risk of CHD.
Conclusions We conclude that the polymorphism is not a suitable genetic marker for increased risk of CHD in subjects
55 years of age.
Inflammation plays an important role in atherosclerosis. The association of the inflammatory interleukin 6 174 G/C polymorphism and risk of coronary heart disease was investigated in a population-based study and additional meta-analysis. No association was found; we conclude the polymorphism is not a suitable marker for increased risk.
Key Words: coronary heart disease inflammation IL-6 polymorphism
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
55 years in age. Its general aims are to investigate determinants of chronic diseases.27 During the first phase of this study (19901993), all of the inhabitants of a Rotterdam suburban area (Ommoord) aged
55 years were invited to participate in this study. The response rate was 78%. Baseline investigations included an interview and visits to the research center, where a number of clinical measurements were performed. Approval of the Medical Ethics Committee of the Erasmus University in Rotterdam was obtained for the Rotterdam Study. From all of the participants, written informed consent was acquired. A more in-depth description of the Rotterdam Study was published previously.27
Clinical Characteristics
Trained investigators collected information using a computerized questionnaire during the home visits. The information included current health status, medical history, use of medication, and smoking behavior. During the 2 subsequent visits to the center, blood samples were obtained, and established cardiovascular risk factors were measured as described elsewhere.28 Hypertension was defined as a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of
160 mm Hg and/or a diastolic blood pressure of
100 mm Hg and/or use of antihypertensive medication (with indication hypertension). Diabetes mellitus (DM) was defined as a nonfasting serum glucose level of
11.1 mmol/L and/or use of antidiabetic medication. A 12-lead ECG was recorded and analyzed by the Modular ECG Analysis System.29 Evaluation of the atherosclerotic status of participants was accomplished using ultrasonography (carotid arteries), radiographic detection (aorta), and ankle-arm index (via blood pressure measurements); these methods have been extensively described previously.30
Measurement of IL-6 and CRP plasma levels
A venapuncture was performed by application of minimal stasis with a 21-gauge Butterfly needle with tube (Surflo winged infusion set, Terumo). Nonfasting blood was collected in tubes containing 0.129 mol/L sodium citrate at 4°C. The ratio of blood:sodium citrate was 9:1. Plasma was collected after centrifugation for 10 minutes at 3000 rpm. Subsequently, platelet-free plasma was obtained by centrifugation for 10 minutes at 10 000 rpm, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen (LN2), and stored at 20°C. All of the tubes were stored on ice before and after blood sampling. Levels of IL-6 were measured by using a commercially available ELISA (Quantikine HS from R&D Systems Europe). CRP was measured in samples stored at 20°C by sensitive immunologic methods based on rate near-infrared particle immunoassays (IMMAGE from Beckman Coulter Netherlands).
Genotyping
Genotyping of the IL-6 174 G/C polymorphism was performed using samples stored earlier at 80°C. DNA was isolated using standard procedures. Genotypes were determined in 2-ng genomic DNA with the Taqman allelic discrimination assay (Applied Biosystems). Primer and probe sequences were optimized by using the single-nucleotide polymorphism assay-by-design service of Applied Biosystems (details available online at http://store.appliedbiosystems.com). Reactions were performed with the Taqman Prism 7900HT 384-wells format in 2 µL of reaction volume.
Follow-Up Procedures and Definition of Events
General practitioners (GPs) in the research district, with whom 85% of the participants of the Rotterdam Study were enlisted, reported fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events. Research assistants verified all of the information by checking medical records at the GP offices. All of the medical records of the participants under the care of GPs outside the study area were checked annually for possible events. Letters and, in case of hospitalization, discharge reports from medical specialists were obtained. With respect to the vital status of participants, information was also obtained regularly from the municipal health authorities in Rotterdam. After notification, the cause and circumstances of death were established by a questionnaire from the GPs. Two research physicians independently coded all of the reported events according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition.31 Codes on which the research physicians disagreed were discussed to reach consensus. Finally, a medical expert in cardiovascular disease, whose judgment was considered final, reviewed all of the events. CHD was defined (based on International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition) as the occurrence of an MI (I21), revascularization procedure (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass graft; Z95.5 and Z95.1), ischemic heart disease (I20 and I22 through I25), sudden cardiac death (I46), ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia (I49), congestive heart failure (I50), or sudden death undefined (R96) during follow-up. Sudden death was defined as death occurring instantaneously or within 1 hour after the onset of symptoms. Incident MI was defined as the occurrence of a fatal or nonfatal MI after the baseline examination.
Meta-Analysis
For the meta-analysis, published data were used from previously published studies, concerning the IL-6 174 G/C polymorphism and CHD, until December 2004. In addition, our own data were also included. Studies were found with Pubmed/Medline using the following key words: IL-6, 174, polymorphism, cardiovascular disease, MI, and CHD and using references from retrieved articles. Eight studies were identified, of which 7 were included in the analysis.15,1925 One study was excluded, because no genotype frequencies were available specified for cases and controls.23 All of the studies were conducted in European populations. As end point in the analyses, we used CHD, defined as the occurrence of an MI, revascularization procedure (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass graft), ischemic heart disease, (sudden) cardiac death, ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia, sudden death undefined, or congestive heart failure.
Statistical Analyses
Baseline characteristics were tested for differences between the genotypes using ANOVA analyses for continuous variables [age, body mass index (BMI), SBP, cholesterol levels, IL-6 levels, and CRP levels) and Pearson
2 tests for discrete variables (sex, smoking, diabetic status, and history of MI). All of the values above mean plus 3 times the SD were excluded, as correction for outliers. Natural-log transformed values of IL-6 and CRP levels were used to normalize the distribution of these variables; presented data are back transformed. Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed to obtain relative risks. All of the analyses were adjusted for age and sex and, additionally, for BMI, SBP, high-density lipoprotein and total cholesterol levels, baseline smoking, and DM. Subjects with prevalent MI were excluded from the analyses. Additional analyses were performed in various age strata (10-year strata starting from 55 years, and above and below 75 years), in strata of sex, smoking, and DM, and in various strata of atherosclerosis (tertiles of aorta calcification and carotid plaques and ankle-arm index above and below 0.9). A P value of
0.05 was considered significant in all of the analyses. The statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 11 and S-Plus 6.0 for MS-Windows.
For the meta-analysis, the method of moments has been used to calculate the relative risks in a random-effects model for the pooled data.32 We used the funnel plots to examine publication bias of reported associations. The meta-analysis and heterogeneity analysis were performed using Review Manager 4.2.7 (RevMan Analyses version 1.0; Cochrane CollaborationWintertree Software Inc).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
IL-6 plasma levels were determined in a random subgroup of 641 subjects after exclusion of outliers (2%). No significant difference in mean IL-6 plasma levels between the genotypes was observed (Figure 1). CRP plasma levels were successfully determined in 5924 cases after exclusion of outliers (1%). The level of CRP was significantly higher in CC (P<0.01) and GC (P<0.01) individuals as compared with the individuals with the wild-type genotype GG (Figure 1). The C-allele was significantly associated with higher CRP levels (P<0.01).
|
During a mean follow-up period of 6.8 (± 2.3) years, there were 648 cases of CHD and 280 cases of MI. After exclusion of patients with previous MI, there were 463 newly diagnosed cases of CHD and 208 cases of incident MI.
There was no significant difference in relative risk of CHD or MI when comparing the GC or CC genotypes and C-allele carriership with the 174 GG wild-type genotype, although there appeared to be a slightly but not significantly increased risk for the subjects with the GC and CC genotype (Table 2). Adjusting for age, BMI, SBP, total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, smoking, and DM did not alter these results.
|
No difference in survival and event-free survival was found among the genotypes CC, GC, and GG for CHD in men (P=0.36) or women (P=0.79). There was also no difference in survival between the genotypes for MI in men (P=0.81) or women (P=0.63). Additional adjustment for covariates did not alter these findings. No significant associations between the 174 genotype and the risk of CHD or MI were observed in strata of age, smoking, diabetic status, and levels of atherosclerosis (data not shown).
Meta-Analysis Results
In the meta-analysis were a total of 13 434 C-allele carriers of whom 36% (n=4799) were CHD cases and 6364 subjects with the wild-type GG genotype of whom 33% (n=2128) were CHD cases. The meta-analysis did not show a significant association between the polymorphism and CHD. Subjects with the CC genotype compared with individuals with the GG genotype had a relative risk of 1.03 (95% CI, 0.92 to 1.16; P=0.59). Also when carriers of the C-allele were compared with the GG genotype, there was no significant difference in risk, 1.12 (95% CI, 0.97 to 1.29; P=0.12; Figure 2). There was evidence for heterogeneity (P=0.003). This was caused by the study of Licastro et al,24 which was an outlier with a very high odds ratio (Figures 2 and 3
). We did not exclude this study, because the exclusion would only shift the nonsignificant results further toward the null value and would not lead to a significant difference in the overall outcome.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our study is based on a large, ongoing populationbased study in a relatively homogeneous population, because 98% of the participants in our study are white and are all living in the same area, a suburb of Rotterdam. In contrast to case control studies, the prospective nature of our study makes our results less prone to survival bias. We adjusted all of the analyses for established risk factors, but this did not change the estimates.
Results from previous studies on this IL-6 174 G/C polymorphism and CHD were inconsistent (Table I, available online at http://atvb.ahajournals.org).15,1926 In the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health (LURIC) cohort and several other studies, no association between this polymorphism and CHD was found.15,19,20,25 Other studies, such as the Étude Cas-Temoins de lInfarctus du Myocarde (ECTIM) Study and a study based on the CHS cohort, found a higher risk of CHD associated with the C-allele.2124,26 All of the studies on IL-6 genotype and CHD were performed in Western populations with predominantly male subjects with an average age of
50 years. It is, therefore, unlikely that differences in findings are because of ethnicity, gender, or age differences between the studies.
To provide a better overview of (inconsistent) findings of various studies, we also studied the association between the IL-6 genotype and the risk of CHD by performing a meta-analysis, which made it possible to study a very large number of events. This meta-analysis also did not show an association between the genotype and risk of CHD. Publication bias is always an important potential source of bias in meta-analyses. However, studies have been published both with positive and negative findings on the association between the polymorphism and the risk of CHD, and the funnel plot does not suggest a strong publication bias.
There is also no consensus on the effect of the genotype on plasma levels of IL-6 and CRP.14,15,1921,23,25,26 The C-allele in our study was significantly associated with higher CRP levels. In most studies showing an effect of the C-allele on plasma levels, the C-allele was associated with higher plasma levels of both IL-6 and CRP.20,21,26,33 This is pathophysiologically plausible, because CRP is produced in the liver, and IL-6 is a hepatocyte stimulant, so elevated IL-6 levels will result in higher CRP levels. However, IL-6 has been described to be too unstable in time (plasma half-life of <2 hours) to be measured precisely.34,35 In addition, there was a limited sample size of IL-6 levels. Given the short half-life, larger numbers would have been needed to detect a relatively small difference in IL-6 levels. This might explain the lack of association between the genotype and IL-6 plasma levels in our study.
In our study, we did not find a clear association between genotype and risk of CHD. This may be related to the fact that the functionality of the polymorphism, at least with respect to the extent of the influence on IL-6 plasma levels, has not been definitively established. Although an effect on transcription and IL-6 levels was described, the view presented by Terry et al,36 whereby the effect is cell-specific and dependent on complex interactions between several polymorphisms, rather then on an individual polymorphism, might be more applicable.18,33 This implies that the solitary 174 G/C genotype might influence plasma levels but not in a substantial way.
There is evidence for the IL-6 174 G/C polymorphism to be in linkage disequilibrium with other functional but less frequently investigated polymorphisms, such as 597 G/A and 572 G/C, and with possibly functional polymorphisms in the 373 AT run.3742 Because of this linkage disequilibrium, these polymorphisms were not considered in our analyses, as analyzing these would provide similar information.
In conclusion, we did not find a significant relation between the IL-6 promoter polymorphism 174 G/C and risk of CHD. Based on our analyses and results from our meta-analysis, we conclude that the polymorphism does not have a prominent role in the pathogenesis of CHD and is, therefore, not a suitable genetic marker for increased risk of CHD.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received May 12, 2005; accepted October 14, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. M. Fleming and G. M. Harrington What Is the Relationship Between Myocardial Perfusion Imaging and Coronary Artery Disease Risk Factors and Markers of Inflammation? Angiology, March 1, 2008; 59(1): 16 - 25. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Qi, C. Zhang, R. M. van Dam, and F. B. Hu Interleukin-6 Genetic Variability and Adiposity: Associations in Two Prospective Cohorts and Systematic Review in 26,944 Individuals J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2007; 92(9): 3618 - 3625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. E. Ntzani, E. C. Rizos, and J. P. A. Ioannidis Genetic Effects versus Bias for Candidate Polymorphisms in Myocardial Infarction: Case Study and Overview of Large-Scale Evidence Am. J. Epidemiol., May 1, 2007; 165(9): 973 - 984. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P.S. Sie, A. G. Uitterlinden, M. J. Bos, P. P. Arp, M. M.B Breteler, P. J. Koudstaal, H. A.P. Pols, A. Hofman, C. M. van Duijn, and J. C.M. Witteman TGF-{beta}1 Polymorphisms and Risk of Myocardial Infarction and Stroke: The Rotterdam Study Stroke, November 1, 2006; 37(11): 2667 - 2671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |