Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2005;25:2005-2011
Published online before print July 14, 2005, doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000178171.61754.cd
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/9/2005    most recent
01.ATV.0000178171.61754.cdv1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sakamoto, T.
Right arrow Articles by Maruyama, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sakamoto, T.
Right arrow Articles by Maruyama, Y.
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2005;25:2005.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


Thrombosis

Endogenous NO Blockade Enhances Tissue Factor Expression via Increased Ca2+ Influx Through MCP-1 in Endothelial Cells by Monocyte Adhesion

Takayuki Sakamoto; Toshiyuki Ishibashi; Nobuo Sakamoto; Koichi Sugimoto; Kensuke Egashira; Hiroshi Ohkawara; Kenji Nagata; Keiko Yokoyama; Masashi Kamioka; Toshihiro Ichiki; Naotoshi Sugimoto; Masahiko Kurabayashi; Koji Suzuki; Yoh Takuwa; Yukio Maruyama

From the First Department of Internal Medicine (T.S., T.I., N.S., K. Sugimoto, H.O., K.N., K.Y., M. Kamioka, Y.M.), Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima; the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (K.E., T .I.), Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka; the Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology (N.S., Y.T.), Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa; the Department of Medicine and Biological Science (M. Kurabayashi), Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi; and the Department of Molecular Pathobiology (K. Suzuki), Mie University School of Medicine, Japan.

Correspondence to Toshiyuki Ishibashi, MD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan. E-mail masaishi{at}fmu.ac.jp


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Objective— Ca2+ plays an important role in tissue factor (TF) gene expression. We investigated the role of endogenous nitric oxide (NO) in the induction of TF expression in endothelial cells (ECs) by monocyte adhesion and the mechanisms of NO action.

Methods and Results— Inhibition of endogenous NO by N{omega}-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) enhanced TF promoter activity and protein expression induced in human coronary ECs by monocyte adhesion, as well as EC surface TF activity. L-NAME also induced monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) expression, which was blocked by an NO donor, NOC18. Exogenous MCP-1 enhanced TF expression induced by monocyte adhesion, whereas adenovirus-mediated expression of the mutant MCP-1, 7ND, abolished the L-NAME enhancement of TF expression induced by monocyte adhesion. Monocyte attachment to L-NAME–treated ECs increased Ca2+ influx, which was prevented by NOC18, anti–MCP-1 antibody or 7ND. These results indicate that the binding of increased MCP-1 induced by endogenous NO blockade to CCR2 mediated the enhancement of Ca2+ influx only when monocytes adhered to ECs, which upregulated TF expression in ECs triggered by monocyte adhesion.

Conclusion— MCP-1/CCR2 may play a role in Ca2+ influx-dependent TF regulation in the monocyte–EC interaction in the impairment of NO synthesis.

Endogenous NO blockade increased Ca2+ influx and TF expression in ECs when monocytes adhered to them. This was inhibited by the mutant MCP-1, 7ND. These suggest a role for MCP-1/CCR2 in endogenous NO blockade in procoagulant activity via Ca2+ influx–dependent TF expression in monocyte–EC interaction.


Key Words: calcium • endothelium • nitric oxide • MCP-1 • tissue factor


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
In the early stage of atherosclerosis, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and adherent molecules are induced in endothelial cells (ECs) under conditions of endothelial dysfunction. These result in monocyte adhesion to the ECs, which plays a crucial role in the progression of atherosclerosis.1,2 MCP-1 also triggers firm adhesion of monocytes to vascular ECs under low flow conditions.3 Namiki et al reported that local overexpression of MCP-1 at the vascular wall induces macrophage accumulation in rabbits.4 In addition, Boring et al showed that the deficiency of CCR2, a receptor for MCP-1, attenuates monocyte/macrophage recruitment at vascular inflammatory sites.5 These observations indicate that MCP-1/CCR2 plays a central role in the monocyte–EC interaction of atherogenesis.

Nitric oxide (NO) synthesized in ECs contributes to normal vascular function, including vascular relaxation, antiinflammation, and antithrombogenicity. Yang et al reported that enhanced production of NO reduces endotoxin- and cytokine-induced tissue factor (TF) expression.6 Endothelial NO synthesis is inhibited by N{omega}-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) which increases MCP-1 in ECs in vitro.7 In vivo studies with a rat model showed that inhibition of NO synthesis by L-NAME increased MCP-1 expression and induced increased arterial thrombogenicity including upregulated expression of TF and the resultant thrombin generation.2,8

Intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) consists of intracellular mobilization from Ca2+ stores and influx via the plasma membrane. The upregulated expression of TF is inhibited by 1,2-bis(o-amino-5-fluorophenoxy)ethane-N,N,Nc,Nc-tetraacetic acid tetraacetoxymethylester (BAPTA-AM) chelation of Ca2+ in cultured smooth muscle cells, indicating that Ca2+ signaling is involved in the induction of TF gene expression.9 Ziegelstein et al showed that endothelial Ca2+ signaling, including intracellular Ca2+ mobilization and Ca2+ influx, is induced by monocyte attachment.10 We recently showed that monocyte adhesion upregulates TF expression mediated via the RhoA/NF-{kappa}B pathway in ECs.11 However, little is known about the relationships between MCP-1/CCR2 and Ca2+ signaling in TF expression of the monocyte–EC interaction.

In the present study, we examined this using human coronary ECs and peripheral blood monocytes, and found that MCP-1 induced by L-NAME increased Ca2+ signaling via Ca2+ influx in ECs when monocytes adhered to ECs and that the increased Ca2+ entry enhanced the TF expression in ECs compared with non–L-NAME treatment in response to monocyte adhesion.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Materials
The sources of most of the conventional reagents for the present study have been described previously.11,12 L-NAME and BAPTA-AM were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co, recombinant human MCP-1 and anti–MCP-1 neutralizing antibody from Genzyme/Techne, and 1-hydroxy-2-oxo-3,3-bis(2-aminoethyl)-1-triazene (NOC18), an NO donor, from Dojindo Laboratories. Human factor VIIa and factor X were provided by Dr Tomohiro Nakagaki (The Chemo-Sera Therapeutic Research Institute, Kumamoto, Japan). The fluorogenic substrate for factor Xa, Boc-Ile-Glu-Gly-Arg-methylcoumarylamide (MCA) was obtained from the Protein Research Foundation. Nifedipine and nicardipine, L-type Ca2+ channel blockers, were generously provided by Bayer Ltd (Leverkusen, Germany) and Yamanouchi Pharmaceutical Co Ltd (Tokyo, Japan), respectively.

Isolation of Human Peripheral Blood Monocytes
Human peripheral blood monocytes were isolated as described previously.11 Informed consent for experimental examination of human peripheral blood was obtained from all the volunteers, and ethical approval was obtained for the study at Fukushima Medical University.

Cell Culture
Human coronary arterial ECs were cultured according to the supplier’s instructions (Clonetics Incand Sanko Junyaku Co Ltd) as described previously.11,12 ECs were pretreated with L-NAME or L-arginine overnight, and 1x104 or 5x105 monocytes were added to confluent ECs in 24-well or 60-mm dishes for immunoassay, Western blotting and TF activity. Supernatants and ECs were used for immunoassays and Western blotting of TF and MCP-1, respectively. The conditioned medium from the coculture of ECs and monocytes or from MCP-1–treated monocytes for 18 hours was added to ECs to determine TF expression. ECs were cultured in 35-mm glass bottom dishes (MatTek Co), and [Ca2+]i was measured in ECs when monocytes attached to them. Culture conditions for promoter analysis are described below.

Immunoassays
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for TF and MCP-1 in the medium was performed using ELISA kits (IMUBIND Tissue Factor ELISA Kit, American Diagnostic Inc and AN'ALYZA Human MCP-1, Genzyme/Techne) as described previously.13

Western Blotting
Western blotting was performed as described previously.11–13 ECs were washed with PBS three times to minimize the contamination of monocytes. We used mouse monoclonal antibody to human TF (Enzyme Research Laboratories) diluted 1:500, goat polyclonal antibody to human MCP-1 (Genzyme/Techne) diluted 1:500, mouse monoclonal antibody to human CD14 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) diluted 1:500, and goat polyclonal antibody to human CCR2 (ab1668, Abcam Ltd) diluted 1:1000.14 NF-{kappa}B activation was also determined by Western blotting as described previously.11

Determination of EC Surface TF Activity
TF activity was determined as factor X activation by factor VIIa/TF complex on ECs after monocyte adhesion as described previously.15 After 6 hours of incubation, the cells were washed three times with HEPES-buffered saline (20 mmol/L HEPES, 150 mmol/L NaCl, pH 7.5) containing 5 mmol/L CaCl2. Aliquots of a mixture of 1 µL of 10 nmol/L factor VIIa, 5 µL of 400 nmol/L factor X, and 194 µL of HEPES-buffered saline containing 5 mmol/L CaCl2 were added to the washed cells and incubated for 1 hour at 37°C. The generated factor Xa was determined using 100 µL of 200 µmol/L Boc-Ile-Glu-Gly-Arg-MCA. The reaction was determined by measuring the absorbance at 390 nm (excitation) and 444 nm (emission) with SPECTRA microplate reader (Molecular Devices Corporation).

DNA Transfection and Luciferase Assay
The luciferase reporter construct TF/Luc contains the human TF promoter region between –383 and +121 as described previously.11

Measurement of [Ca2+]i
Endothelial [Ca2+]i was measured in response to monocyte attachment or thrombin in the absence or presence of external Ca2+ as described previously.16 ECs were incubated with 10–4 mol/L L-NAME in the absence or presence of anti–MCP-1 antibody (250 µg/mL) overnight. Fura-2–loaded ECs were perfused with prewarmed (37°C) Tyrode solution with or without external Ca2+ in the absence or presence of 20 ng/mL MCP-1, and isolated monocytes were added. [Ca2+]i was also measured in the ECs transfected with LacZ or the dominant negative human MCP-1, 7ND, as described below, in response to monocyte attachment. Ni2+ was used as a nonspecific Ca2+ channel inhibitor.

Adenovirus Gene Transfer
ECs were infected with adenoviruses encoding 7ND (N-terminal MCP-1 deletion variant), which binds to the receptor for MCP-1 (CCR2) and subsequently blocks MCP-1–mediated biological activities, or LacZ at a multiplicity of infection of {approx}50, as described previously.2,11

Densitometric Analysis
The optical densities of individual immunoblots were analyzed using the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD) IMAGE program as described previously.11,12

Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA with Scheffé post hoc test if appropriate. A value of P<0.05 was considered significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
TF Expression in ECs Triggered by Monocyte Adhesion
Western blotting showed that L-NAME alone had no effect on TF expression in ECs (Figure 1A, lane 2), and that monocyte adhesion to ECs induced an increase in the expression of TF compared with ECs cultured alone (Figure 1A, lane 3). Pretreatment of ECs with L-NAME overnight enhanced the increased expression of TF caused by monocyte adhesion (Figure 1A, lane 4). Similar results were obtained by ELISA of the culture medium in 4 independent experiments (ECs; control, ECs+L-NAME; 102±14%, ECs+monocytes (Mo); 210±20%, ECs+L-NAME+Mo; 351±34%, P<0.01, control versus ECs+Mo and ECs+L-NAME+Mo, P<0.05, ECs+Mo versus ECs+L-NAME+Mo, n=4, control values; 48±10 pg/mL).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Effect of L-NAME on TF expression (A), TF promoter activity (B), and surface TF activity (C) in ECs with or without being cocultured with monocytes. A, TF expression in ECs treated with or without L-NAME after 1 day of coculturing with or without monocytes (Mo) as determined by Western blotting. Immunoblots are from an experiment representative of 4 similar experiments. Data are expressed as means±SD of 4 separate experiments. *P<0.05. B, The promoter activity of the TF gene in ECs in response to monocyte adhesion was determined after 6 hours of incubation with or without monocytes. Data are expressed as means±SD of 5 separate experiments. *P<0.05. C, EC surface TF activity was determined as factor Xa generation 6 hours after adding monocytes. Data are expressed as means±SD of 4 separate experiments. {dagger}P<0.0001; {ddagger}P<0.01. D, A negligible immunoblot of TF expression by adding monocytes (5x105) and effect of conditioned medium from coculture of monocytes and ECs on TF expression in ECs alone as determined by Western blotting.

Promoter analysis revealed that L-NAME treatment had no effect on the promoter activity of TF in ECs cultured alone (Figure 1B, lane 2). Addition of monocytes increased the activity of the TF promoter in ECs after 6 hours of incubation, and pretreatment of ECs with L-NAME overnight significantly augmented the increased promoter activity of TF in ECs induced by monocyte adhesion (Figure 1B, lanes 3 and 4), indicating that the upregulation of the TF gene expression in ECs in response to monocytes was at the transcriptional level.

We also measured EC surface TF activity in response to monocyte adhesion (Figure 1C). A similar result by TF activity was obtained to those of TF expression and promoter activity. Monocyte adhesion induced 45±13% and 81±20% increases in EC surface TF activity in control and L-NAME–treated ECs, respectively (Figure 1C, lanes 3 and 4).

We examined the effects on TF expression of adding monocytes and the conditioned medium from the coculture for 18 hours. At least as determined by Western blotting, adding monocytes alone showed a negligible band (Figure 1D, lane 1), and the addition of the conditioned medium to ECs did not significantly increase the expression of TF (Figure 1D, lanes 2 and 3). In addition, we further examined the expression of relatively monocyte-specific antigen CD14 to clarify that the TF being measured is coming from ECs rather than residual monocytes/macrophages. Western blotting revealed the negligible effect of monocyte adhesion on CD14 expression in ECs after the cultures were washed extensively to remove the monocytes (data not shown).

Effect of L-NAME on MCP-1 Production in ECs
Western blotting demonstrated that 10–4 mol/L L-NAME significantly increased the expression of MCP-1 in ECs cultured alone (Figure 2A, lane 2). A similar result was obtained by ELISA of the culture medium (Figure 2B, lane 2). Coincubation with 500 µmol/L NOC18, an NO donor, prevented the increased production of MCP-1 in ECs induced by 10–4 mol/L L-NAME (Figure 2A and 2B, lane 3).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. MCP-1 expression in cells and medium was determined by Western blotting (A) and ELISA (B) in response to L-NAME after 1 day of culture. ECs were incubated with 10–4 mol/L L-NAME overnight in the absence or presence of 500 µmol/L NOC18. A, Representative immunoblots of MCP-1 from 4 similar experiments are shown at top. Data are expressed as means±SD of 4 separate experiments. *P<0.05. B, Levels of MCP-1 in the cultured medium. Data are expressed as means±SD of 4 separate experiments. {dagger}P<0.0001.

Effect of MCP-1 on TF Expression
To clarify the relationship between L-NAME–induced MCP-1 production and enhancement of monocyte adhesion-triggered TF expression in ECs, we examined the effect of pretreatment with MCP-1 overnight on TF expression in ECs cultured alone and in those cocultured with monocytes. The concentrations of MCP-1 in the medium of ECs cultured alone and after adding monocytes were 2.5±0.4 ng/mL and 4.3±0.6 ng/mL of 4 separate experiments, respectively. Western blotting revealed that various concentrations of MCP-1 (2.5, 5, 20, and 100 ng/mL) alone did not change the expression of TF in ECs cultured alone (20 ng/mL MCP-1; Figure 3, lane 2). Monocyte adhesion increased the TF expression in ECs as described above (Figure 1), and MCP-1 augmented the increased expression of TF caused by monocyte adhesion (Figure 3, lanes 3 and 4). These results were consistent with those of the L-NAME experiments (Figure 1), suggesting that MCP-1 mediates L-NAME–induced enhancement of TF expression triggered by monocyte adhesion.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. A, Effect of exogenous MCP-1 on TF expression in ECs cultured alone or with monocytes (Mo). ECs were pretreated with or without MCP-1 (2.5, 5, 20, and 100 ng/mL) overnight, monocytes were added, and TF expression was determined by Western blotting after 18 hours of incubation. In this figure, representative immunoblots from 4 similar experiments using 20 ng/mL MCP-1 are shown at top. Data with 20 ng/mL MCP-1 are expressed as means±SD of 4 separate experiments. *P<0.05. B, Effect of conditioned medium from MCP-1–treated monocytes for 18 hours on TF expression in ECs as determined by Western blotting.

We further determined whether conditioned medium from MCP-1–treated monocytes for 18 hours induced an increase of TF expression without the necessity for monocyte adhesion, indicating no significant increase in TF expression in ECs alone stimulated with the MCP-1–treated monocyte-conditioned medium (Figure 3B).

Effect of Blockade of CCR2 on Monocyte Adhesion–Triggered TF Expression
To clarify the role of MCP-1 in TF expression in L-NAME–treated ECs caused by monocytes, we examined the expression of CCR2 in the ECs used in this study and transfected 7ND into ECs to block CCR2, followed by L-NAME treatment and adding monocytes. Figure 4A shows the expression of CCR2 in the ECs in addition to the control expression by monocytes as determined by Western blotting. Importantly, 7ND prevented the augmentation of the increased TF expression caused by monocyte adhesion in L-NAME–treated ECs (Figure 4B, lane 3).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. A, CCR2 expression of ECs and monocytes (Mo) as determined by Western blotting, showing the immunoblot of 40 kDa. Immunoblots of CCR2 are from an experiment representative of 3 separate experiments. B, Effect of adenovirus-mediated expression of 7ND on TF expression triggered by monocyte adhesion in L-NAME–treated ECs. ECs were transfected with LacZ or 7ND as described in Methods. After transfection, ECs were treated with 10–4 mol/L L-NAME overnight, monocytes were added, and after 18 hours of coculture, Western blotting of TF was performed. Immunoblots are from an experiment representative of 3 similar experiments. Data are expressed as means±SD of 3 independent experiments. *P<0.05.

Correlation Between Ca2+ Signaling and TF Expression
We examined the relationship between Ca2+ signaling and TF expression. Without decreasing cell viability (94±3% versus 96±2% of control, not significant), BAPTA-AM (10 µmol/L), an intracellular Ca2+ chelator, prevented the upregulation of TF expression in L-NAME–treated ECs induced by monocyte adhesion as determined by Western blotting (Figure 5A, lane 3). Representative immunoblots are shown at the top of Figure 5A. Similar results were obtained from promoter analysis (Figure 5B). Monocyte adhesion to L-NAME–treated ECs increased the phosphorylation of NF-{kappa}B p65, whereas Ca2+ chelation prevented the activation of NF-{kappa}B p65 caused by monocyte adhesion in L-NAME–treated ECs (Figure 5C, lane 3). These results indicate that Ca2+ plays a crucial role in TF expression at a site upstream of NF-{kappa}B.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Effect of BAPTA-AM on the antigen levels (A), the promoter activity of TF (B), and the phosphorylation of NF-{kappa}B p65 (C) during monocyte adhesion to L-NAME–treated ECs. After ECs were pretreated with 10–4 mol/L L-NAME overnight, 10 µmol/L BAPTA-AM was added 30 minutes before adding monocytes (Mo). A, The expression of TF was determined by Western blotting after 18 hours of coculture. Western blots are from an experiment representative of 3 similar experiments. Data are expressed as means±SD of 3 independent experiments. *P<0.05. B, The TF promoter assay was performed after 6 hours of incubation with monocytes. Data are expressed as means±SD of 3 independent experiments. *P<0.05. C, Phosphorylation of NF-{kappa}B p65 1 hour after coculturing L-NAME–treated ECs with monocytes. Western blots are from an experiment representative of 3 similar experiments.

Correlation Between Ca2+ Influx and MCP-1
To investigate the mechanism by which L-NAME augments the increased TF expression caused by monocyte adhesion, we focused on the correlation between Ca2+ influx and MCP-1/CCR2. First, we measured endothelial [Ca2+]i in response to monocyte attachment in the presence or absence of external Ca2+. Monocyte attachment induced a rapid and transient increase in [Ca2+]i in ECs. Mean peak [Ca2+]i values increased by 26±5% in the presence of external Ca2+ compared with those in its absence (n=40, each group, P<0.0001, Figure 6A), indicating that the increase in the presence of external Ca2+ was attributable to Ca2+ influx through the plasma membrane in response to monocyte attachment. In the absence of external Ca2+, incubation of ECs with 10–4 mol/L L-NAME or exogenous MCP-1 did not alter the [Ca2+]i peak values in ECs when monocytes attached to them (Figure 6B, lanes 2 and 3). In contrast, in the presence of external Ca2+, there was an increase in [Ca2+]i in response to monocyte attachment in L-NAME–treated cells compared with the control (Figure 6C, lane 2). Coincubation with NOC18 prevented the [Ca2+]i increase caused by L-NAME in ECs triggered by monocytes (Figure 6C, lane 3). The L-NAME–induced [Ca2+]i increase was also abolished by incubating ECs with anti–MCP-1 overnight (Figure 6C, lane 4).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Intracellular Ca2+ concentrations ([Ca2+]i) in ECs in response to monocyte attachment (A through E) and thrombin (F) as determined by fura-2 fluorescence assay. A, Peak values of [Ca2+]i in the presence or absence of external Ca2+. Means±SD of % fluorescent values of 40 ECs in the absence of external Ca2+ (lane 2) compared with the control values in the presence of external Ca2+ (lane 1) in an experiment representative of 4 similar experiments. *P<0.0001. B, Peak values of [Ca2+]i in the absence of external Ca2+. ECs were pretreated or not with 10–4 mol/L L-NAME or 20 ng/mL MCP-1. Means±SD of % fluorescent values of 40 ECs compared with the control in an experiment representative of 4 similar experiments. *P<0.0001. C, Effects of NOC18 and anti–MCP-1 antibody on the increased Ca2+ influx in L-NAME–treated ECs in the presence of external Ca2+. ECs were pretreated or not with 10–4 mol/L L-NAME in the presence of 500 µmol/L NOC18 or 250 µg/mL anti–MCP-1 antibody and then monocytes were added. Means±SD of % fluorescent values of 40 ECs compared with the control in an experiment representative of 4 similar experiments. *P<0.0001. D, Effect of 7ND on increased Ca2+ influx in L-NAME–treated ECs in response to monocyte attachment in the presence of external Ca2+. ECs were transfected with LacZ or 7ND and then with 10–4 mol/L L-NAME. Means±SD of % fluorescent values of 40 ECs compared with the control in an experiment representative of 4 similar experiments. *P<0.0001. E, Effect of Ni2+ on the increase in Ca2+ influx induced by monocyte attachment in the presence of external Ca2+. ECs were pretreated or not with 10–4 mol/L L-NAME in the presence of 20 ng/mL MCP-1 or 5 mmol/L Ni2+ and then monocytes were added. Means±SD of % fluorescent values of 40 ECs compared with the control from an experiment representative of 4 similar experiments. *P<0.0001 versus control. F, Effect of exogenous MCP-1 on thrombin-induced Ca2+ influx in ECs. Peak values of [Ca2+]i were measured in response to 1 U/mL thrombin in the presence or absence of external Ca2+ in ECs. Means±SD of % peak fluorescent values of 60 ECs compared with control in an experiment representative of 5 similar experiments. *P<0.0001.

To further examine the role of MCP-1/CCR2 in the [Ca2+]i increase in the presence of external Ca2+ in response to monocyte attachment, we transfected the 7ND gene into ECs. Transfection of the LacZ gene into ECs did not significantly affect the [Ca2+]i increase caused by L-NAME in response to monocyte attachment (Figure 6D, lane 2). 7ND reversed the L-NAME–induced enhancement of [Ca2+]i increase in response to monocyte attachment to ECs (Figure 6D, lane 3).

Ni2+ (5 mmol/L) blocked the Ca2+ influx in response to monocyte attachment in the presence of external Ca2+ (Figure 6E, lane 4). The [Ca2+]i increase induced by L-NAME or MCP-1 in ECs in response to monocyte attachment was also completely blocked by Ni2+ (Figure 6E, lanes 5 and 6).

To mimic the effect of monocyte attachment on Ca2+ influx in ECs, we used thrombin as another agonist of Ca2+ influx. Thrombin (1 U/mL) induced a rapid increase in [Ca2+]i in the presence or absence of external Ca2+ in ECs. Exogenous MCP-1 (20 ng/mL) augmented the Ca2+ influx caused by thrombin in the presence of external Ca2+, but not the intracellular Ca2+ mobilization in the absence of external Ca2+ (Figure 6F), although MCP-1 alone did not induce Ca2+ influx or intracellular Ca2+ mobilization in ECs.

Moreover, nifedipine or nicardipine did not change the monocyte attachment–induced increase in [Ca2+]i in L-NAME–treated ECs, suggesting that it is unlikely that L-type voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels are involved (data not shown).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In this study we showed that treatment of ECs with L-NAME not only enhanced the upregulation of TF expression triggered by monocyte adhesion but also the Ca2+ influx in response to monocyte attachment. Our data also showed that monocyte attachment-induced increase in Ca2+ influx was mediated via MCP-1/CCR2 in L-NAME–treated cells.

In the present study, blockade of endogenous NO by L-NAME induced modest but clear increases in endothelial TF promoter activity, TF expression, and surface TF activity in response to monocyte adhesion by 71±9%, 119±18%, and 81±20%, respectively (Figure 1), although the degree of increase was modest compared with those induced by other agonists such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS), interleukin (IL)-1ß, and Ca2+ ionophore in ECs.6,17 Especially, EC surface TF activity as determined by factor X activation increased in response to monocyte adhesion in L-NAME–treated ECs, indicating that the modest but definite upregulation of coagulation cascade. These results, to our knowledge, are the first in the literature to demonstrate the significance of endogenous NO blockade in TF gene expression induced in ECs by monocyte adhesion at least in vitro using the various assay systems as described above. This would suggest that monocyte adhesion to NO-impaired ECs promotes the procoagulability of the vascular wall in the initial steps of atherosclerosis. The issue that monocyte adhesion induces significant amounts of TF in NO-impaired ECs in vivo remains to be elucidated. Because L-NAME produced MCP-1 and CCR2 was expressed in ECs used in this study which were consistent with previous reports.7,18–20 Thus, we determined whether or not MCP-1 directly induces TF gene expression in ECs. There was no significant difference in TF promoter activity and TF expression in response to the various concentrations of MCP-1 in ECs cultured alone, suggesting that MCP-1 does not induce TF directly in ECs. The medium from MCP-1–treated monocytes did not augment TF expression in ECs cultured alone, indicating no involvement of MCP-1–derived other factor(s) from monocytes. However, in response to monocyte adhesion, the elevated or exogenous MCP-1 augmented the increased expression of TF in L-NAME–treated ECs, which was prevented by blockade of CCR2 by 7ND. This suggests that MCP-1 only works when monocytes adhere to ECs.

The induction of TF is Ca2+-dependent in various cells.9,17 In this study, TF expression was not altered by L-NAME in ECs cultured alone with no significant change in [Ca2+]i. When monocytes were attached, there were increases in endothelial [Ca2+]i and NF-{kappa}B activation in L-NAME–treated ECs compared with untreated ECs (Figures 5C and 6UpC). BAPTA-AM prevented the upregulation of TF expression caused by monocyte adhesion as well as the increased activation of NF-{kappa}B in L-NAME–treated ECs (Figure 5). These results indicate that Ca2+ signaling is upstream of NF-{kappa}B in monocyte adhesion to ECs. Ca2+ experiments performed in the present study demonstrated that L-NAME–treated ECs had increased Ca2+ influx unrelated to voltage-dependent L-type Ca2+ channel when monocytes were attached, and that an NO donor reversed the effect of L-NAME on the increased Ca2+ influx in this monocyte–EC interaction.

Thus, we clarified the relationship between MCP-1/CCR2 and Ca2+ influx in the monocyte–EC interaction. L-NAME treatment and exogenous MCP-1 augmented the Ca2+ influx caused by monocyte attachment in ECs, but not the intracellular Ca2+ mobilization. Blockade of CCR2 by 7ND or an antibody to MCP-1 prevented the increase in monocyte attachment–induced Ca2+ influx in ECs caused by L-NAME. Our results show, again for the first time, that the increased endothelial MCP-1 caused by NO blockade augmented Ca2+ influx in response to monocyte attachment, which may serve to enhance TF gene expression at the transcriptional level. For a better understanding of the mechanism involved, we used thrombin as another agonist of Ca2+ influx. Exogenous MCP-1 also enhanced the Ca2+ influx induced by thrombin in ECs (Figure 6F). These findings suggest that the binding of increased MCP-1 to G-protein–coupled receptor CCR2 may directly enhance the signaling to the Ca2+ channel which is responsible for the Ca2+, only when ECs are stimulated with agonists such as monocyte attachment and thrombin. Mirzadegan et al showed that CCR2 antagonists inhibit MCP-1–stimulated Ca2+ influx in CCR2-transfected cells.21 Taken together, our results suggest that MCP-1 may play a role in Ca2+ influx involving CCR2-activated channel. The detailed mechanism by which MCP-1/CCR2 modulates agonist-mediated Ca2+ influx induced in ECs by monocytes attachment must be elucidated.

In a rat model, increased MCP-1 expression is responsible for macrophage accumulation in the vascular wall induced by chronic blockade of NO synthesis by L-NAME.2 Using the same model of long-term inhibition of NO increased arterial thrombogenicity along with upregulated expression of TF.8 Our study may thus provide a possible mechanism involving MCP-1/CCR2-mediated Ca2+ influx for the increased TF expression in the monocyte–EC interaction in their animal model in vivo. The present study suggests the role of MCP-1/CCR2 in procoagulant activity in the vascular wall, which is critical for the development of early atherosclerosis and the formation of vulnerable plaques.1,5In conclusion, our study presents evidence that endogenous NO blockade increases endothelial Ca2+ influx in response to monocyte attachment, and that this is mediated via MCP-1/CCR2, which causes upregulation of TF in ECs. This indicates that impairment of NO synthesis enhances TF expression via inflammation-dependent Ca2+ influx in the monocyte–EC interaction.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (14370232) and a Research Grant for Cardiovascular Diseases from the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare of Japan.

Received November 22, 2004; accepted July 1, 2005.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Ross R. Atherosclerosis: an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340: 115–126.[Free Full Text]

2. Egashira K. Molecular mechanism mediating inflammation in vascular disease: special reference to monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. Hypertension. 2003; 41 [part 2]: 834–841.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Gerszten RE, Garcia-Zepeda EA, Lim YC, Yoshida M, Ding HA, Gimbrone MA Jr, Luster AD, Luscinskas FW, Rosenzweig A. MCP-1 and IL-8 trigger firm adhesion of monocytes to vascular endothelium under flow conditions. Nature. 1999; 398: 718–723.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Namiki M, Kawashima S, Yamashita T, Ozaki M, Hirase T, Ishida T, Inoue N, Hirata K, Matsukawa A, Morishita R, Kaneda Y, Yokoyama M. Local overexpression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 at vessel wall induces infiltration of macrophages and formation of atherosclerotic lesion: synergism with hypercholesterolemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002; 22: 115–120.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Boring L, Gosling J, Cleary M, Charo IF. Decreased lesion formation in CCR2–/– mice reveals a role for chemokines in the initiation of atherosclerosis. Nature. 1998; 394: 894–897.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Yang Y, Loscalzo J. Regulation of tissue factor expression in human microvascular endothelial cells by nitric oxide. Circulation. 2000; 101: 2144–2148.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Zeiher AM, Fisslthaler B, Schray-Utz B, Busse R. Nitric oxide modulates the expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 in cultured human endothelial cells. Circ Res. 1995; 76: 980–986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Kubo-Inoue M, Egashira K, Usui M, Takemoto M, Ohtani K, Katoh M, Shimokawa H, Takeshita A. Long-term inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis increases arterial thrombogenecity in rat carotid artery. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002; 282: H1478–H1484.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Taubman MB, Marmur JD, Rosenfield CL, Guha A, Nichtberger S, Nemerson Y. Agonist-mediated tissue factor expression in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells: role of Ca2+ mobilization and protein kinase C activation. J Clin Invest. 1993; 91: 547–552.

10. Ziegelstein RC, Corda S, Pili R, Passaniti A, Lefer D, Zweier JL, Fraticelli A, Capogrossi MC. Initial contact and subsequent adhesion of human neutrophils or monocytes to human aortic endothelial cells releases an endothelial intracellular calcium store. Circulation. 1994; 90: 1899–1907.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Ishibashi T, Sakamoto T, Ohkawara H, Nagata K, Sugimoto K, Sakurada S, Sugimoto N, Watanabe A, Yokoyama K, Sakamoto N, Kurabayashi M, Takuwa Y, Maruyama Y. Integral role of RhoA activation in monocyte adhesion-triggered tissue factor expression in endothelial cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23: 681–687.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Ohkawara H, Ishibashi T, Sakamoto T, Sugimoto K, Nagata K, Yokoyama K, Sakamoto N, Kamioka M, Matsuoka I, Fukuhara S, Sugimoto N, Takuwa Y, Maruyama Y. Thrombin-induced rapid geranylgeranylation of RhoA as an essential process for RhoA activation in endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2005; 280: 10182–10188.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Nagata K, Ishibashi T, Sakamoto T, Nakazato K, Seino Y, Yokoyama K, Ohkawara H, Teramoto T, Maruyama Y. Effects of blockade of the renin-angiotensin system on tissue factor and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 synthesis in human cultured monocytes. J Hypertens. 2001; 19: 775–783.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Charo IF, Myers SJ, Herman A, Franci C, Connolly AJ, Coughlin SR. Molecular cloning and functional expression of two monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 receptors reveals alternative splicing of the carboxyl-terminal tails. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994; 91: 2752–2756.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Deguchi H, Takeya H, Wada H, Gabazza EC, Hayashi G, Urano H, Suzuki K. Dilazep, an antiplatelet agent, inhibits tissue factor expression in endothelial cells and monocytes. Blood. 1997; 90: 2345–2356.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Yokoyama K, Ishibashi T, Ohkawara H, Kimura J, Matsuoka I, Sakamoto T, Nagata K, Sugimoto K, Sakurada S, Maruyama Y. 3hydroxy3methylglutaryl (HMG)-coenzymeA (CoA) reductase inhibitors suppress intracellular calcium mobilization and membrane current induced by lysophosphatidylcholine in endothelial cells. Circulation. 2002; 105: 962–967.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Wakita K, Stearns-Kurosawa DJ, Marumoto Y. The effect of calcium ionophore A23187 on tissue factor activity and mRNA in endothelial cells. Thromb Res. 1994; 74: 95–103.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Salcedo R, Ponce SM, Young HA, Wasserman K, Ward JM, Kleinman HK, Oppenheim JJ, Murphy WJ. Human endothelial cells express CCR2 and respond to MCP-1: direct role of MCP-1 in angiogenesis and tumor progression. Blood. 2000; 96: 34–40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Weber KS, Nelson PJ, Gröne HJ, Weber C. Expression of CCR2 by endothelial cells implications for MCP-1 mediated wound injury repair and in vivo inflammatory activation of endothelium. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999; 19: 2085–2093.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Stamatovic SM, Keep RF, Kunkel SL, Andjelkovic AV. Potential role of MCP-1 in endothelial cell tight junction ‘opening’: signaling via Rho and Rho kinase. J Cell Sci. 2003; 116: 4615–4628.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Mirzadegan T, Diehl F, Ebi B, Bhakta S, Polsky I, McCarley D, Mulkins M, Weatherhead GS, Lapierre JM, Dankwardt J, Morgans D Jr., Wilhelm R, Jarnagin K. Identification of the binding site for a novel class of CCR2b chemokine receptor antagonists. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 25562–25571.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
K. Sugimoto, T. Ishibashi, T. Sawamura, N. Inoue, M. Kamioka, H. Uekita, H. Ohkawara, T. Sakamoto, N. Sakamoto, Y. Okamoto, et al.
LOX-1-MT1-MMP axis is crucial for RhoA and Rac1 activation induced by oxidized low-density lipoprotein in endothelial cells
Cardiovasc Res, October 1, 2009; 84(1): 127 - 136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
T. Nakagawa
Uncoupling of the VEGF-endothelial nitric oxide axis in diabetic nephropathy: an explanation for the paradoxical effects of VEGF in renal disease
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): F1665 - F1672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/9/2005    most recent
01.ATV.0000178171.61754.cdv1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sakamoto, T.
Right arrow Articles by Maruyama, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sakamoto, T.
Right arrow Articles by Maruyama, Y.