Thrombosis |
From the First Department of Internal Medicine (T.S., T.I., N.S., K. Sugimoto, H.O., K.N., K.Y., M. Kamioka, Y.M.), Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima; the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (K.E., T .I.), Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka; the Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology (N.S., Y.T.), Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa; the Department of Medicine and Biological Science (M. Kurabayashi), Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi; and the Department of Molecular Pathobiology (K. Suzuki), Mie University School of Medicine, Japan.
Correspondence to Toshiyuki Ishibashi, MD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan. E-mail masaishi{at}fmu.ac.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Inhibition of endogenous NO by N
-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) enhanced TF promoter activity and protein expression induced in human coronary ECs by monocyte adhesion, as well as EC surface TF activity. L-NAME also induced monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) expression, which was blocked by an NO donor, NOC18. Exogenous MCP-1 enhanced TF expression induced by monocyte adhesion, whereas adenovirus-mediated expression of the mutant MCP-1, 7ND, abolished the L-NAME enhancement of TF expression induced by monocyte adhesion. Monocyte attachment to L-NAMEtreated ECs increased Ca2+ influx, which was prevented by NOC18, antiMCP-1 antibody or 7ND. These results indicate that the binding of increased MCP-1 induced by endogenous NO blockade to CCR2 mediated the enhancement of Ca2+ influx only when monocytes adhered to ECs, which upregulated TF expression in ECs triggered by monocyte adhesion.
Conclusion MCP-1/CCR2 may play a role in Ca2+ influx-dependent TF regulation in the monocyteEC interaction in the impairment of NO synthesis.
Endogenous NO blockade increased Ca2+ influx and TF expression in ECs when monocytes adhered to them. This was inhibited by the mutant MCP-1, 7ND. These suggest a role for MCP-1/CCR2 in endogenous NO blockade in procoagulant activity via Ca2+ influxdependent TF expression in monocyteEC interaction.
Key Words: calcium endothelium nitric oxide MCP-1 tissue factor
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nitric oxide (NO) synthesized in ECs contributes to normal vascular function, including vascular relaxation, antiinflammation, and antithrombogenicity. Yang et al reported that enhanced production of NO reduces endotoxin- and cytokine-induced tissue factor (TF) expression.6 Endothelial NO synthesis is inhibited by N
-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) which increases MCP-1 in ECs in vitro.7 In vivo studies with a rat model showed that inhibition of NO synthesis by L-NAME increased MCP-1 expression and induced increased arterial thrombogenicity including upregulated expression of TF and the resultant thrombin generation.2,8
Intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) consists of intracellular mobilization from Ca2+ stores and influx via the plasma membrane. The upregulated expression of TF is inhibited by 1,2-bis(o-amino-5-fluorophenoxy)ethane-N,N,Nc,Nc-tetraacetic acid tetraacetoxymethylester (BAPTA-AM) chelation of Ca2+ in cultured smooth muscle cells, indicating that Ca2+ signaling is involved in the induction of TF gene expression.9 Ziegelstein et al showed that endothelial Ca2+ signaling, including intracellular Ca2+ mobilization and Ca2+ influx, is induced by monocyte attachment.10 We recently showed that monocyte adhesion upregulates TF expression mediated via the RhoA/NF-
B pathway in ECs.11 However, little is known about the relationships between MCP-1/CCR2 and Ca2+ signaling in TF expression of the monocyteEC interaction.
In the present study, we examined this using human coronary ECs and peripheral blood monocytes, and found that MCP-1 induced by L-NAME increased Ca2+ signaling via Ca2+ influx in ECs when monocytes adhered to ECs and that the increased Ca2+ entry enhanced the TF expression in ECs compared with nonL-NAME treatment in response to monocyte adhesion.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Isolation of Human Peripheral Blood Monocytes
Human peripheral blood monocytes were isolated as described previously.11 Informed consent for experimental examination of human peripheral blood was obtained from all the volunteers, and ethical approval was obtained for the study at Fukushima Medical University.
Cell Culture
Human coronary arterial ECs were cultured according to the suppliers instructions (Clonetics Incand Sanko Junyaku Co Ltd) as described previously.11,12 ECs were pretreated with L-NAME or L-arginine overnight, and 1x104 or 5x105 monocytes were added to confluent ECs in 24-well or 60-mm dishes for immunoassay, Western blotting and TF activity. Supernatants and ECs were used for immunoassays and Western blotting of TF and MCP-1, respectively. The conditioned medium from the coculture of ECs and monocytes or from MCP-1treated monocytes for 18 hours was added to ECs to determine TF expression. ECs were cultured in 35-mm glass bottom dishes (MatTek Co), and [Ca2+]i was measured in ECs when monocytes attached to them. Culture conditions for promoter analysis are described below.
Immunoassays
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for TF and MCP-1 in the medium was performed using ELISA kits (IMUBIND Tissue Factor ELISA Kit, American Diagnostic Inc and AN'ALYZA Human MCP-1, Genzyme/Techne) as described previously.13
Western Blotting
Western blotting was performed as described previously.1113 ECs were washed with PBS three times to minimize the contamination of monocytes. We used mouse monoclonal antibody to human TF (Enzyme Research Laboratories) diluted 1:500, goat polyclonal antibody to human MCP-1 (Genzyme/Techne) diluted 1:500, mouse monoclonal antibody to human CD14 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) diluted 1:500, and goat polyclonal antibody to human CCR2 (ab1668, Abcam Ltd) diluted 1:1000.14 NF-
B activation was also determined by Western blotting as described previously.11
Determination of EC Surface TF Activity
TF activity was determined as factor X activation by factor VIIa/TF complex on ECs after monocyte adhesion as described previously.15 After 6 hours of incubation, the cells were washed three times with HEPES-buffered saline (20 mmol/L HEPES, 150 mmol/L NaCl, pH 7.5) containing 5 mmol/L CaCl2. Aliquots of a mixture of 1 µL of 10 nmol/L factor VIIa, 5 µL of 400 nmol/L factor X, and 194 µL of HEPES-buffered saline containing 5 mmol/L CaCl2 were added to the washed cells and incubated for 1 hour at 37°C. The generated factor Xa was determined using 100 µL of 200 µmol/L Boc-Ile-Glu-Gly-Arg-MCA. The reaction was determined by measuring the absorbance at 390 nm (excitation) and 444 nm (emission) with SPECTRA microplate reader (Molecular Devices Corporation).
DNA Transfection and Luciferase Assay
The luciferase reporter construct TF/Luc contains the human TF promoter region between 383 and +121 as described previously.11
Measurement of [Ca2+]i
Endothelial [Ca2+]i was measured in response to monocyte attachment or thrombin in the absence or presence of external Ca2+ as described previously.16 ECs were incubated with 104 mol/L L-NAME in the absence or presence of antiMCP-1 antibody (250 µg/mL) overnight. Fura-2loaded ECs were perfused with prewarmed (37°C) Tyrode solution with or without external Ca2+ in the absence or presence of 20 ng/mL MCP-1, and isolated monocytes were added. [Ca2+]i was also measured in the ECs transfected with LacZ or the dominant negative human MCP-1, 7ND, as described below, in response to monocyte attachment. Ni2+ was used as a nonspecific Ca2+ channel inhibitor.
Adenovirus Gene Transfer
ECs were infected with adenoviruses encoding 7ND (N-terminal MCP-1 deletion variant), which binds to the receptor for MCP-1 (CCR2) and subsequently blocks MCP-1mediated biological activities, or LacZ at a multiplicity of infection of
50, as described previously.2,11
Densitometric Analysis
The optical densities of individual immunoblots were analyzed using the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD) IMAGE program as described previously.11,12
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA with Scheffé post hoc test if appropriate. A value of P<0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Promoter analysis revealed that L-NAME treatment had no effect on the promoter activity of TF in ECs cultured alone (Figure 1B, lane 2). Addition of monocytes increased the activity of the TF promoter in ECs after 6 hours of incubation, and pretreatment of ECs with L-NAME overnight significantly augmented the increased promoter activity of TF in ECs induced by monocyte adhesion (Figure 1B, lanes 3 and 4), indicating that the upregulation of the TF gene expression in ECs in response to monocytes was at the transcriptional level.
We also measured EC surface TF activity in response to monocyte adhesion (Figure 1C). A similar result by TF activity was obtained to those of TF expression and promoter activity. Monocyte adhesion induced 45±13% and 81±20% increases in EC surface TF activity in control and L-NAMEtreated ECs, respectively (Figure 1C, lanes 3 and 4).
We examined the effects on TF expression of adding monocytes and the conditioned medium from the coculture for 18 hours. At least as determined by Western blotting, adding monocytes alone showed a negligible band (Figure 1D, lane 1), and the addition of the conditioned medium to ECs did not significantly increase the expression of TF (Figure 1D, lanes 2 and 3). In addition, we further examined the expression of relatively monocyte-specific antigen CD14 to clarify that the TF being measured is coming from ECs rather than residual monocytes/macrophages. Western blotting revealed the negligible effect of monocyte adhesion on CD14 expression in ECs after the cultures were washed extensively to remove the monocytes (data not shown).
Effect of L-NAME on MCP-1 Production in ECs
Western blotting demonstrated that 104 mol/L L-NAME significantly increased the expression of MCP-1 in ECs cultured alone (Figure 2A, lane 2). A similar result was obtained by ELISA of the culture medium (Figure 2B, lane 2). Coincubation with 500 µmol/L NOC18, an NO donor, prevented the increased production of MCP-1 in ECs induced by 104 mol/L L-NAME (Figure 2A and 2B, lane 3).
|
Effect of MCP-1 on TF Expression
To clarify the relationship between L-NAMEinduced MCP-1 production and enhancement of monocyte adhesion-triggered TF expression in ECs, we examined the effect of pretreatment with MCP-1 overnight on TF expression in ECs cultured alone and in those cocultured with monocytes. The concentrations of MCP-1 in the medium of ECs cultured alone and after adding monocytes were 2.5±0.4 ng/mL and 4.3±0.6 ng/mL of 4 separate experiments, respectively. Western blotting revealed that various concentrations of MCP-1 (2.5, 5, 20, and 100 ng/mL) alone did not change the expression of TF in ECs cultured alone (20 ng/mL MCP-1; Figure 3, lane 2). Monocyte adhesion increased the TF expression in ECs as described above (Figure 1), and MCP-1 augmented the increased expression of TF caused by monocyte adhesion (Figure 3, lanes 3 and 4). These results were consistent with those of the L-NAME experiments (Figure 1), suggesting that MCP-1 mediates L-NAMEinduced enhancement of TF expression triggered by monocyte adhesion.
|
We further determined whether conditioned medium from MCP-1treated monocytes for 18 hours induced an increase of TF expression without the necessity for monocyte adhesion, indicating no significant increase in TF expression in ECs alone stimulated with the MCP-1treated monocyte-conditioned medium (Figure 3B).
Effect of Blockade of CCR2 on Monocyte AdhesionTriggered TF Expression
To clarify the role of MCP-1 in TF expression in L-NAMEtreated ECs caused by monocytes, we examined the expression of CCR2 in the ECs used in this study and transfected 7ND into ECs to block CCR2, followed by L-NAME treatment and adding monocytes. Figure 4A shows the expression of CCR2 in the ECs in addition to the control expression by monocytes as determined by Western blotting. Importantly, 7ND prevented the augmentation of the increased TF expression caused by monocyte adhesion in L-NAMEtreated ECs (Figure 4B, lane 3).
|
Correlation Between Ca2+ Signaling and TF Expression
We examined the relationship between Ca2+ signaling and TF expression. Without decreasing cell viability (94±3% versus 96±2% of control, not significant), BAPTA-AM (10 µmol/L), an intracellular Ca2+ chelator, prevented the upregulation of TF expression in L-NAMEtreated ECs induced by monocyte adhesion as determined by Western blotting (Figure 5A, lane 3). Representative immunoblots are shown at the top of Figure 5A. Similar results were obtained from promoter analysis (Figure 5B). Monocyte adhesion to L-NAMEtreated ECs increased the phosphorylation of NF-
B p65, whereas Ca2+ chelation prevented the activation of NF-
B p65 caused by monocyte adhesion in L-NAMEtreated ECs (Figure 5C, lane 3). These results indicate that Ca2+ plays a crucial role in TF expression at a site upstream of NF-
B.
|
Correlation Between Ca2+ Influx and MCP-1
To investigate the mechanism by which L-NAME augments the increased TF expression caused by monocyte adhesion, we focused on the correlation between Ca2+ influx and MCP-1/CCR2. First, we measured endothelial [Ca2+]i in response to monocyte attachment in the presence or absence of external Ca2+. Monocyte attachment induced a rapid and transient increase in [Ca2+]i in ECs. Mean peak [Ca2+]i values increased by 26±5% in the presence of external Ca2+ compared with those in its absence (n=40, each group, P<0.0001, Figure 6A), indicating that the increase in the presence of external Ca2+ was attributable to Ca2+ influx through the plasma membrane in response to monocyte attachment. In the absence of external Ca2+, incubation of ECs with 104 mol/L L-NAME or exogenous MCP-1 did not alter the [Ca2+]i peak values in ECs when monocytes attached to them (Figure 6B, lanes 2 and 3). In contrast, in the presence of external Ca2+, there was an increase in [Ca2+]i in response to monocyte attachment in L-NAMEtreated cells compared with the control (Figure 6C, lane 2). Coincubation with NOC18 prevented the [Ca2+]i increase caused by L-NAME in ECs triggered by monocytes (Figure 6C, lane 3). The L-NAMEinduced [Ca2+]i increase was also abolished by incubating ECs with antiMCP-1 overnight (Figure 6C, lane 4).
|
To further examine the role of MCP-1/CCR2 in the [Ca2+]i increase in the presence of external Ca2+ in response to monocyte attachment, we transfected the 7ND gene into ECs. Transfection of the LacZ gene into ECs did not significantly affect the [Ca2+]i increase caused by L-NAME in response to monocyte attachment (Figure 6D, lane 2). 7ND reversed the L-NAMEinduced enhancement of [Ca2+]i increase in response to monocyte attachment to ECs (Figure 6D, lane 3).
Ni2+ (5 mmol/L) blocked the Ca2+ influx in response to monocyte attachment in the presence of external Ca2+ (Figure 6E, lane 4). The [Ca2+]i increase induced by L-NAME or MCP-1 in ECs in response to monocyte attachment was also completely blocked by Ni2+ (Figure 6E, lanes 5 and 6).
To mimic the effect of monocyte attachment on Ca2+ influx in ECs, we used thrombin as another agonist of Ca2+ influx. Thrombin (1 U/mL) induced a rapid increase in [Ca2+]i in the presence or absence of external Ca2+ in ECs. Exogenous MCP-1 (20 ng/mL) augmented the Ca2+ influx caused by thrombin in the presence of external Ca2+, but not the intracellular Ca2+ mobilization in the absence of external Ca2+ (Figure 6F), although MCP-1 alone did not induce Ca2+ influx or intracellular Ca2+ mobilization in ECs.
Moreover, nifedipine or nicardipine did not change the monocyte attachmentinduced increase in [Ca2+]i in L-NAMEtreated ECs, suggesting that it is unlikely that L-type voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels are involved (data not shown).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, blockade of endogenous NO by L-NAME induced modest but clear increases in endothelial TF promoter activity, TF expression, and surface TF activity in response to monocyte adhesion by 71±9%, 119±18%, and 81±20%, respectively (Figure 1), although the degree of increase was modest compared with those induced by other agonists such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS), interleukin (IL)-1ß, and Ca2+ ionophore in ECs.6,17 Especially, EC surface TF activity as determined by factor X activation increased in response to monocyte adhesion in L-NAMEtreated ECs, indicating that the modest but definite upregulation of coagulation cascade. These results, to our knowledge, are the first in the literature to demonstrate the significance of endogenous NO blockade in TF gene expression induced in ECs by monocyte adhesion at least in vitro using the various assay systems as described above. This would suggest that monocyte adhesion to NO-impaired ECs promotes the procoagulability of the vascular wall in the initial steps of atherosclerosis. The issue that monocyte adhesion induces significant amounts of TF in NO-impaired ECs in vivo remains to be elucidated. Because L-NAME produced MCP-1 and CCR2 was expressed in ECs used in this study which were consistent with previous reports.7,1820 Thus, we determined whether or not MCP-1 directly induces TF gene expression in ECs. There was no significant difference in TF promoter activity and TF expression in response to the various concentrations of MCP-1 in ECs cultured alone, suggesting that MCP-1 does not induce TF directly in ECs. The medium from MCP-1treated monocytes did not augment TF expression in ECs cultured alone, indicating no involvement of MCP-1derived other factor(s) from monocytes. However, in response to monocyte adhesion, the elevated or exogenous MCP-1 augmented the increased expression of TF in L-NAMEtreated ECs, which was prevented by blockade of CCR2 by 7ND. This suggests that MCP-1 only works when monocytes adhere to ECs.
The induction of TF is Ca2+-dependent in various cells.9,17 In this study, TF expression was not altered by L-NAME in ECs cultured alone with no significant change in [Ca2+]i. When monocytes were attached, there were increases in endothelial [Ca2+]i and NF-
B activation in L-NAMEtreated ECs compared with untreated ECs (Figures 5C and 6
C). BAPTA-AM prevented the upregulation of TF expression caused by monocyte adhesion as well as the increased activation of NF-
B in L-NAMEtreated ECs (Figure 5). These results indicate that Ca2+ signaling is upstream of NF-
B in monocyte adhesion to ECs. Ca2+ experiments performed in the present study demonstrated that L-NAMEtreated ECs had increased Ca2+ influx unrelated to voltage-dependent L-type Ca2+ channel when monocytes were attached, and that an NO donor reversed the effect of L-NAME on the increased Ca2+ influx in this monocyteEC interaction.
Thus, we clarified the relationship between MCP-1/CCR2 and Ca2+ influx in the monocyteEC interaction. L-NAME treatment and exogenous MCP-1 augmented the Ca2+ influx caused by monocyte attachment in ECs, but not the intracellular Ca2+ mobilization. Blockade of CCR2 by 7ND or an antibody to MCP-1 prevented the increase in monocyte attachmentinduced Ca2+ influx in ECs caused by L-NAME. Our results show, again for the first time, that the increased endothelial MCP-1 caused by NO blockade augmented Ca2+ influx in response to monocyte attachment, which may serve to enhance TF gene expression at the transcriptional level. For a better understanding of the mechanism involved, we used thrombin as another agonist of Ca2+ influx. Exogenous MCP-1 also enhanced the Ca2+ influx induced by thrombin in ECs (Figure 6F). These findings suggest that the binding of increased MCP-1 to G-proteincoupled receptor CCR2 may directly enhance the signaling to the Ca2+ channel which is responsible for the Ca2+, only when ECs are stimulated with agonists such as monocyte attachment and thrombin. Mirzadegan et al showed that CCR2 antagonists inhibit MCP-1stimulated Ca2+ influx in CCR2-transfected cells.21 Taken together, our results suggest that MCP-1 may play a role in Ca2+ influx involving CCR2-activated channel. The detailed mechanism by which MCP-1/CCR2 modulates agonist-mediated Ca2+ influx induced in ECs by monocytes attachment must be elucidated.
In a rat model, increased MCP-1 expression is responsible for macrophage accumulation in the vascular wall induced by chronic blockade of NO synthesis by L-NAME.2 Using the same model of long-term inhibition of NO increased arterial thrombogenicity along with upregulated expression of TF.8 Our study may thus provide a possible mechanism involving MCP-1/CCR2-mediated Ca2+ influx for the increased TF expression in the monocyteEC interaction in their animal model in vivo. The present study suggests the role of MCP-1/CCR2 in procoagulant activity in the vascular wall, which is critical for the development of early atherosclerosis and the formation of vulnerable plaques.1,5In conclusion, our study presents evidence that endogenous NO blockade increases endothelial Ca2+ influx in response to monocyte attachment, and that this is mediated via MCP-1/CCR2, which causes upregulation of TF in ECs. This indicates that impairment of NO synthesis enhances TF expression via inflammation-dependent Ca2+ influx in the monocyteEC interaction.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received November 22, 2004; accepted July 1, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Egashira K. Molecular mechanism mediating inflammation in vascular disease: special reference to monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. Hypertension. 2003; 41 [part 2]: 834841.
3. Gerszten RE, Garcia-Zepeda EA, Lim YC, Yoshida M, Ding HA, Gimbrone MA Jr, Luster AD, Luscinskas FW, Rosenzweig A. MCP-1 and IL-8 trigger firm adhesion of monocytes to vascular endothelium under flow conditions. Nature. 1999; 398: 718723.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Namiki M, Kawashima S, Yamashita T, Ozaki M, Hirase T, Ishida T, Inoue N, Hirata K, Matsukawa A, Morishita R, Kaneda Y, Yokoyama M. Local overexpression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 at vessel wall induces infiltration of macrophages and formation of atherosclerotic lesion: synergism with hypercholesterolemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002; 22: 115120.
5. Boring L, Gosling J, Cleary M, Charo IF. Decreased lesion formation in CCR2/ mice reveals a role for chemokines in the initiation of atherosclerosis. Nature. 1998; 394: 894897.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Yang Y, Loscalzo J. Regulation of tissue factor expression in human microvascular endothelial cells by nitric oxide. Circulation. 2000; 101: 21442148.
7. Zeiher AM, Fisslthaler B, Schray-Utz B, Busse R. Nitric oxide modulates the expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 in cultured human endothelial cells. Circ Res. 1995; 76: 980986.
8. Kubo-Inoue M, Egashira K, Usui M, Takemoto M, Ohtani K, Katoh M, Shimokawa H, Takeshita A. Long-term inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis increases arterial thrombogenecity in rat carotid artery. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002; 282: H1478H1484.
9. Taubman MB, Marmur JD, Rosenfield CL, Guha A, Nichtberger S, Nemerson Y. Agonist-mediated tissue factor expression in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells: role of Ca2+ mobilization and protein kinase C activation. J Clin Invest. 1993; 91: 547552.
10. Ziegelstein RC, Corda S, Pili R, Passaniti A, Lefer D, Zweier JL, Fraticelli A, Capogrossi MC. Initial contact and subsequent adhesion of human neutrophils or monocytes to human aortic endothelial cells releases an endothelial intracellular calcium store. Circulation. 1994; 90: 18991907.
11. Ishibashi T, Sakamoto T, Ohkawara H, Nagata K, Sugimoto K, Sakurada S, Sugimoto N, Watanabe A, Yokoyama K, Sakamoto N, Kurabayashi M, Takuwa Y, Maruyama Y. Integral role of RhoA activation in monocyte adhesion-triggered tissue factor expression in endothelial cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23: 681687.
12. Ohkawara H, Ishibashi T, Sakamoto T, Sugimoto K, Nagata K, Yokoyama K, Sakamoto N, Kamioka M, Matsuoka I, Fukuhara S, Sugimoto N, Takuwa Y, Maruyama Y. Thrombin-induced rapid geranylgeranylation of RhoA as an essential process for RhoA activation in endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2005; 280: 1018210188.
13. Nagata K, Ishibashi T, Sakamoto T, Nakazato K, Seino Y, Yokoyama K, Ohkawara H, Teramoto T, Maruyama Y. Effects of blockade of the renin-angiotensin system on tissue factor and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 synthesis in human cultured monocytes. J Hypertens. 2001; 19: 775783.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Charo IF, Myers SJ, Herman A, Franci C, Connolly AJ, Coughlin SR. Molecular cloning and functional expression of two monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 receptors reveals alternative splicing of the carboxyl-terminal tails. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994; 91: 27522756.
15. Deguchi H, Takeya H, Wada H, Gabazza EC, Hayashi G, Urano H, Suzuki K. Dilazep, an antiplatelet agent, inhibits tissue factor expression in endothelial cells and monocytes. Blood. 1997; 90: 23452356.
16. Yokoyama K, Ishibashi T, Ohkawara H, Kimura J, Matsuoka I, Sakamoto T, Nagata K, Sugimoto K, Sakurada S, Maruyama Y. 3hydroxy3methylglutaryl (HMG)-coenzymeA (CoA) reductase inhibitors suppress intracellular calcium mobilization and membrane current induced by lysophosphatidylcholine in endothelial cells. Circulation. 2002; 105: 962967.
17. Wakita K, Stearns-Kurosawa DJ, Marumoto Y. The effect of calcium ionophore A23187 on tissue factor activity and mRNA in endothelial cells. Thromb Res. 1994; 74: 95103.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Salcedo R, Ponce SM, Young HA, Wasserman K, Ward JM, Kleinman HK, Oppenheim JJ, Murphy WJ. Human endothelial cells express CCR2 and respond to MCP-1: direct role of MCP-1 in angiogenesis and tumor progression. Blood. 2000; 96: 3440.
19. Weber KS, Nelson PJ, Gröne HJ, Weber C. Expression of CCR2 by endothelial cells implications for MCP-1 mediated wound injury repair and in vivo inflammatory activation of endothelium. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999; 19: 20852093.
20. Stamatovic SM, Keep RF, Kunkel SL, Andjelkovic AV. Potential role of MCP-1 in endothelial cell tight junction opening: signaling via Rho and Rho kinase. J Cell Sci. 2003; 116: 46154628.
21. Mirzadegan T, Diehl F, Ebi B, Bhakta S, Polsky I, McCarley D, Mulkins M, Weatherhead GS, Lapierre JM, Dankwardt J, Morgans D Jr., Wilhelm R, Jarnagin K. Identification of the binding site for a novel class of CCR2b chemokine receptor antagonists. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 2556225571.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Sugimoto, T. Ishibashi, T. Sawamura, N. Inoue, M. Kamioka, H. Uekita, H. Ohkawara, T. Sakamoto, N. Sakamoto, Y. Okamoto, et al. LOX-1-MT1-MMP axis is crucial for RhoA and Rac1 activation induced by oxidized low-density lipoprotein in endothelial cells Cardiovasc Res, October 1, 2009; 84(1): 127 - 136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nakagawa Uncoupling of the VEGF-endothelial nitric oxide axis in diabetic nephropathy: an explanation for the paradoxical effects of VEGF in renal disease Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): F1665 - F1672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |