| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atherosclerosis and Lipoproteins |
From JDRF Danielle Alberti Memorial Centre for Diabetes Complications (A.C.C., J.M.F., C.M.S., M.L., M.E.C., K.A.J.-D., T.J.A.), Vascular Division, Wynn Domain, Baker Heart Research Institute, and the Department of Medicine (A.C.C.), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Correspondence to Anna C. Calkin, JDRF Danielle Alberti Centre for Diabetes Complications, Baker Heart Research Institute, PO Box 6492, St Kilda Rd Central, Melbourne 8008, Australia. E-mail anna.calkin{at}baker.edu.au
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Control and diabetic apolipoprotein Edeficient mice received rosiglitazone or placebo. Diabetic mice demonstrated a 3-fold increase in plaque area, which was attenuated by rosiglitazone. There was no significant difference in glucose, insulin, or cholesterol levels between treated and untreated diabetic animals. Rosiglitazone attenuated the increase in superoxide production observed in diabetic mice. A 4-fold increase in the reverse cholesterol transport marker ABCA1 was observed in treated diabetic mice. Rosiglitazone reduced angiotensin II receptor gene expression in control and diabetic mice, and macrophage accumulation was increased in diabetic mice compared with controls and was attenuated by rosiglitazone.
Conclusions These findings suggest peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-
ligands such as rosiglitazone confer vascular protection independent of their effects on metabolic control. These antiatherosclerotic effects may have important clinical ramifications not only in insulin resistance/type 2 diabetes and also in type 1 diabetes.
To assess the independent vascular effects of rosiglitazone, we treated streptozotocindiabetic apolipoprotein Edeficient mice with rosiglitazone for 20 weeks. Rosiglitazone significantly reduced plaque area in the absence of changes in glucose, insulin, or cholesterol levels. These results may implicate a role for thiazolidinediones in the absence of insulin resistance.
Key Words: ABCA1 atherosclerosis diabetes macrophages oxidative stress
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The underlying cause for the increased atherosclerosis remains unknown, with various pathways implicated, including advanced glycation end products (AGEs), oxidative stress,2 and the renin-angiotensin system (RAS).3 These factors have been demonstrated to contribute toward the acceleration of atherosclerotic plaque development,2,3 particularly in the context of concomitant hyperglycemia.
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are nuclear transcription factors that alter the expression of target genes. On heterodimerization with retinoid X receptor, they translocate to the nucleus, whereupon they bind to the PPAR response element in the promoter region of target genes and proceed to induce transcription.4 There are 3 isoforms of PPARs,
,
, and ß/
, differentially expressed with specific roles.4 Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone are PPAR
agonists currently used in the clinic for the treatment of type 2 diabetes as insulin sensitizing agents. Whereas PPAR
is expressed most abundantly in adipose tissue as well as skeletal muscle and the kidney, it has also been shown to be expressed in cells of the vessel wall, including endothelial cells,5 smooth muscle cells,6 and macrophages.7 Furthermore, recent studies have demonstrated a role for PPAR
agonists in directly regulating many of the processes involved in atherosclerotic plaque development such as monocyte recruitment8 and migration,9 foam cell formation,10,11 and plaque stability,12 as well as inhibiting such pathways as AGEs,13 oxidative stress,14 and RAS.15 There are, however, few studies undertaken in in vivo models. Previous studies have established a role for PPAR
in attenuating atherosclerosis in both apolipoprotein Edeficient (apo E/) and low-density lipoprotein receptordeficient (LDLR/) mice.1618 However, these effects were observed in association with beneficial effects on plasma insulin. Specifically, these studies have not determined whether the antiatherosclerotic effects of PPAR
agonists are related to their well-characterized effects on various metabolic parameters or are independent vascular effects.
Thus the aims of this study were firstly to determine whether the PPAR
agonist, rosiglitazone, exerts antiatherogenic properties in vivo, independent of its effects on insulin sensitivity and glycemic control. This study used an animal model of insulin deficiency, streptozotocindiabetes, in which PPAR
agonism has no significant impact on insulin and glucose levels. The second aim was to explore the potential molecular and cellular mechanisms responsible for the antiatherosclerotic effect observed with rosiglitazone.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Metabolic Parameters
Red blood cells were collected for measurement of glycohemoglobin by high-performance liquid chromatography.19 Plasma glucose, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, total cholesterol, and triglycerides were measured using an automated system (Abbott Architect ci8200; Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Ill), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was calculated according to the Friedewald formula.20 Fasting plasma insulin was determined by a radioimmunoassay (Linco Research, St Charles, Minn).
Plaque Area Quantitation
Plaque area was quantitated as described previously.21 Aortas removed from mice were cleaned of excess fat under a dissecting microscope and subsequently stained with Sudan IV-Herxheimers solution (0.5% wt/vol) (Gurr; BDH Limited, Poole, UK). Aortas were dissected longitudinally, divided into arch, thoracic, and abdominal segments, and pinned flat onto wax. Images were acquired with a dissecting microscope equipped with an Axiocam camera (Zeiss, Heidelberg, Germany). Total and segmental plaque area was quantitated as a percentage area of aorta stained (Adobe Photoshop version 7.0). Tissue was subsequently embedded in paraffin and sections cut for immunohistochemical analysis.
Vascular Superoxide Production
Vascular superoxide was quantitated by lucigenin-enhanced chemiluminescence as established by Omar et al.22 Freshly excised aortas were cleaned of peripheral fat in chilled Krebs buffer, cut into 2-mm sections, and placed in a 96-well plate such that aortic origin (arch, thoracic, or abdominal) was randomized. NADH (125 µmol/L) or NADPH (125 µmol/L) was added to wells with either diphenylene iodinium (30 µmol/L), an inhibitor of NAD(P)H oxidase, or rotenone (100 µmol/L), a mitochondrial complex I inhibitor, respectively (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, Mo). Lucigenin (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to a final concentration of 3.75 µmol/L. Luminescence measurements were taken at 6-minute intervals for a period of 60 minutes and results were averaged per well and expressed as relative light units (RLU) per 10 mg.
Real-Time Reverse-Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction
Total RNA was extracted from whole aorta by homogenizing (Polytron PT-MR2100; Kinematica AG) in Trizol (Life Technologies, Rockville, Md). Total RNA was then DNAse-treated (DNA removal kit; Ambion, Austin, Tex) and cDNA was synthesized by reverse transcription (Pierce, Rockford, Ill). Quantitative real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction was performed using the Taqman System as described previously3 on an ABI Prism 7700 Sequence Detector (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif) and analyzed using software detection systems (SDS version 1.9) software. Gene expression was normalized to 18S rRNA (Applied Biosystems). For detailed information on probes, please see http://atvb.ahajournals.org.
Immunohistochemistry
Serial sections were stained for gp91phox, CuZnSOD, and p47phox using a standard immunohistochemical procedure as previously described.3 Sections were incubated with primary antibody at dilutions of 1:100 for gp91phox (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, Calif), 1:50 for CuZnSOD (Sigma-Aldrich) or 1:500 for p47phox (Upstate Biotechnology, Charlottesville, Va) overnight at 4°C. Secondary antibody (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, Calif), anti-goat immunoglobulin (1:500), anti-mouse immunoglobulin (1:250), or anti-rabbit immunoglobulin (1:500), respectively, was applied for 10 minutes at room temperature. The CSA mouse amplification kit (Dako Corporation, Carpinteria, Calif) was used to stain for macrophage marker F4/8023 (Serotec Ltd, Oxford, UK). Primary antibody was added at a dilution of 1:50 and left overnight at 4°C. Secondary antibody, anti-rat immunoglobulin (Vector Laboratories) was added at a dilution of 1:200 to sections for 15 minutes at room temperature. Images were quantitated on an Olympus BX50 microscope using Optimis (version 6.2) and digitized using a color video camera (3-charge coupled device; JVC, Wayne, NJ). Results were quantitated as percent of positively stained tissue.3
Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed by ANOVA using Statview (version 5.0). Post-hoc comparisons were made among the various groups using Fishers least significant difference method. Data are expressed as mean±SEM unless otherwise specified. P
0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Plaque Area
Diabetic mice had a 3-fold increase in total plaque area as compared with control mice (Figure 1 A). Rosiglitazone attenuated total plaque area in both control (P<0.005) and diabetic (P<0.0001) mice when compared with their untreated counterparts. Quantitation of plaque area revealed that plaques were predominantly seen in the aortic arch (Figure 1B) and rosiglitazone was most effective at reducing plaque accumulation at this site.
|
Inflammation
Using F4/80 as a marker of macrophage accumulation, we investigated F4/80 staining across all groups within the present study. We demonstrated a significant increase in F4/80 staining in diabetic animals (14.6±1.8%) compared with controls (9.1±1.9%), which was attenuated by rosiglitazone (6.1±1.6%; P<0.002) (Figure 2). Furthermore, we demonstrated an increase in gene expression of the NF-
B subunit p65 in diabetic mice, which was attenuated by rosiglitazone (Table 2).
|
|
Lipid Regulation
Gene expression of the ATP-binding cassette transporter A1, ABCA1, was significantly increase in rosiglitazone-treated diabetic animals compared with all other groups (P<0.02) (Table 2). Using real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, we demonstrated in our model that rosiglitazone had no effect on the regulation of the scavenger receptor, CD36, at the mRNA level (Table 2).
Oxidative Stress
We demonstrated that aortic tissue from diabetic mice exhibited an increase in NADPH-dependent superoxide production compared with control mice in the presence of rotenone (Figure 3). Rosiglitazone significantly attenuated NADPH-dependent superoxide production in both control and diabetic mice (P<0.0005). There was no difference in NADH-dependent superoxide production between control and diabetic mice (data not shown). To further elucidate the regulation of NADPH-dependent superoxide production by rosiglitazone, subunit expression was analyzed. No change in gp91phox gene (Table 2) or protein expression was observed across all groups (see http://atvb.ahajournals.org). Analysis of p47phox gene expression revealed a 2.6-fold upregulation in diabetic mice compared with control mice (P<0.001), and this was attenuated by rosiglitazone treatment (P<0.05) (Table 2). Furthermore, immunohistochemistry revealed a diabetes-related increase in p47phox protein expression, which was attenuated by rosiglitazone treatment (Figure 4). Investigation of gene expression of rac-1, involved in NAD(P)H oxidase assembly, demonstrated a 3.8-fold increase in diabetic mice which was abrogated to control levels with rosiglitazone treatment. Gene expression of the antioxidant, CuZnSOD, was unaltered in diabetic mice, although rosiglitazone increased CuZnSOD protein expression 1.6-fold in control mice but not in diabetic mice (see http://atvb.ahajournals.org.).
|
|
In addition, superoxide production can increase via activation of the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE)24 or the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1).25 In our study, although diabetes was associated with >2.5-fold increase in RAGE gene expression, rosiglitazone had no effect on this parameter (Table 2). In contrast, AT1 gene expression was not altered in diabetic mice compared with control; however, rosiglitazone attenuated AT1 expression in both control and diabetic mice (Table 2).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
agonist, attenuates diabetes-associated atherosclerosis. This was observed in the absence of changes in glycemic control and, most importantly, in the absence of an effect on insulin levels in diabetic apo E/ mice. Further examination of potential mechanisms of action of rosiglitazone suggests that this attenuation in plaque area by the PPAR
agonist may be mediated through pathways involving inflammation as well as modulation of pathways linked to the generation of oxidative stress. The apo E/ mouse model is a well-characterized animal model of atherosclerosis, exhibiting advanced lesions when fed a high-fat diet, with a morphology similar to that seen in humans.26 The induction of diabetes by streptozotocin in this model has been previously established, and studies have demonstrated attenuation of atherosclerotic plaques via the inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system3,21 or reduction in AGE-mediated phenomena27,28 in this model. Furthermore, the changes seen in this model appear to be directly related to the increase in glucose and are not a toxic effect of streptozotocin because a recent study using a different approach to induce type 1 diabetes, viral-induced pancreatic destruction on a LDLR/ background, was also associated with increased atherosclerosis.29
This study has specifically investigated the direct antiatherosclerotic effects of a PPAR
agonist after long-term treatment in a model of insulin deficiency. In our study, rosiglitazone did not affect glucose levels in either control or diabetic mice. However, as anticipated, this agent significantly reduced plasma insulin levels in control mice consistent with PPAR
agonists acting as insulin sensitizers. Rosiglitazone had no effect on fasting insulin levels in diabetic mice because streptozotocin had induced insulin insufficiency. This lack of effect on insulin in the diabetic mice by rosiglitazone has allowed us to assess the direct vascular effects of this agent. Therefore, it is tempting to suggest that the antiatherosclerotic effects of rosiglitazone observed in the diabetic mice are essentially independent of its effects on both insulin and glucose levels. Another group has recently demonstrated that short-term treatment with rosiglitazone reduces plaque area in diabetic apo E/ mice but did not determine whether the effects seen were linked to insulin sensitization.30
PPAR
agonists have been shown previously to reduce MCP-1,9 intercellular adhesion molecule-1, and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1,31 and thus monocytemacrophage homing to atherosclerotic plaques.31 We demonstrated in the present study that diabetes was associated with an increase in macrophage staining in the aorta. The antiinflammatory effect of PPAR
agonists may explain the reduction in macrophage accumulation observed in the vessel wall of the diabetic mice treated with rosiglitazone.
Whereas PPARs are recognized to work through DNA-dependent mechanisms, more recent studies have shown that they may exert some of their antiinflammatory effects through the transrepression pathway, interfering with the activation of nuclear transcription factors such as nuclear factor-
B (NF-
B), STAT, and activator protein-1 (AP-1).7 This effect was confirmed in our study as demonstrated by a reduction in gene expression of the NF-
B subunit p65 with rosiglitazone treatment in diabetic mice.
Our study demonstrated an increase in ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) gene expression in diabetic mice in association with rosiglitazone treatment. ABCA1, a mediator of reverse cholesterol transport, is involved in apolipoprotein A1mediated cholesterol efflux from macrophages, which can lead to an increase in HDL cholesterol.32 PPAR
agonists have been previously shown to increase cholesterol efflux from macrophages via the ABCA1 pathway in vitro.32 In the current study, an increase in ABCA1 gene expression did not lead to changes in HDL levels. Thus, changes in lipoproteins do not appear to be a major mechanism, whereby rosiglitazone is mediating its antiatherogenic actions. This interpretation is consistent with previous studies exploring links between PPAR
agonists and ABCA1 expression in vivo.33 Although in vitro studies had suggested that PPAR
agonism promotes ABCA1 expression, such an effect was not observed in vivo in that study.33
PPAR
agonists have also been demonstrated to influence macrophage biology by regulation of the scavenger receptor CD36.10 CD36 is responsible for the uptake of oxidized LDL, which is itself a ligand for PPAR
. This leads to increased expression of CD36, a target gene for PPAR
.10 However, in vivo studies have demonstrated that despite an increase in CD36 expression, troglitazone, another TZD, caused attenuation of fatty streak formation in high-fatfed apo E/ mice.18 Thus, controversy has surrounded the role of PPAR
in macrophages biology. In the current study, we demonstrated no change in CD36 expression in response to PPAR
activation by rosiglitazone in the setting of a clearly documented antiatherosclerotic effect of this agent.
Oxidative stress leads to an upregulation of adhesion molecules,34 acceleration of foam cell formation, reduced plaque stability,35 and endothelial dysfunction.14 In the current study, we observed an increase in exogenous NADPH-stimulated superoxide production, (inhibitable by apocynin and DPI) in aortas from diabetic mice. This effect was attenuated by rosiglitazone, consistent with previous literature demonstrating a role for PPAR
agonists in reducing oxidative stress in such settings as human endothelial cells,36 hypercholesterolemic rabbits,14 and obese subjects.37
Hyperglycemia per se has been associated with an increase in oxidative stress. Rosiglitazone had no significant effect on plasma glucose levels in this study, suggesting that the rosiglitazone effect did not occur via direct effects on glucose-induced upregulation of oxidative stress. RAGE expression was investigated because of previous findings that, first, RAGE activation increases oxidative stress24 and, second, that rosiglitazone, albeit in a cell culture medium,13 modulates RAGE expression. However, in the current study, RAGE gene expression was unaltered by rosiglitazone treatment.
Previous studies have shown that PPAR
agonists can modulate expression of NAD(P)H oxidase subunits38 as well as antioxidant expression.36 In the current study, we demonstrated that rosiglitazone attenuated the increase in expression of p47phox observed in diabetic mice, an effect previously shown in vitro in endothelial cells.36 Similarly, diabetes was associated in a marked increase in rac-1, which was also abrogated by rosiglitazone. Rac is a GTPase involved in NAD(P)H oxidase activation, and its inhibition has been associated with reductions in angiotensin IImediated oxidative stress.39 This may further contribute to the reduction in superoxide production observed in rosiglitazone-treated diabetic mice.
Angiotensin II has been shown to increase reactive oxygen species through modulating NAD(P)H-dependent pathways, and inhibition of angiotensin II via AT1 blockade results in a reduction in superoxide production.25 Interestingly, angiotensin II has been shown to regulate p47phox expression.40 Thus, inhibition of angiotensin IImediated superoxide production via downregulation of the angiotensin II receptor, as was seen in response to rosiglitazone in this study, may be a major mechanism responsible for the reduction in superoxide production seen with rosiglitazone treatment. Whereas no change in gp91phox expression was observed in the current study, there may have an alteration in other isoforms shown to be expressed in the vasculature, including nox1 or nox4.
Previous studies have demonstrated an upregulation of the RAS in the vessel wall in diabetic apo E/ mice3 and blockade of the RAS either via AT1 blockade or via angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition has been demonstrated to attenuate plaque formation in apoE/ mice.3,21 Infusion of angiotensin II has been reported to increase plaque area 6-fold in apo E/ mice fed an atherogenic diet.41 Angiotensin II has also been demonstrated to mediate effects on monocyte recruitment,42 foam cell formation,43 and inflammation.42 Furthermore, angiotensin II has been demonstrated to mediate proinflammatory effects via the activation of NF-
B.42 In the current study, the finding that rosiglitazone attenuated AT1 gene expression further emphasizes the potential role of the vascular renin-angiotensin system in atherogenesis, including in the context of diabetes. The antiinflammatory effects mediated by rosiglitazone as observed by F4/80 staining may be mediated via downregulation of AT1 expression. This effect in vivo on expression of this receptor subtype is consistent with previous studies demonstrating that PPAR
agonists reduce AT1 receptor promoter activity.44 It remains to be determined if this indirect effect via interruption of the RAS, specifically the angiotensin II receptor 1 subtype, or a direct effect of the PPAR
agonist on NF-
B/I
-B
regulation plays the dominant role in mediating the antiatherogenic effects of rosiglitazone. Ultimately, it would be of interest to assess if these effects seen with rosiglitazone treatment lead to improvements in endothelial function. This issue warrants further investigation to determine whether the molecular and cellular events observed in this study ultimately translate to improved vascular function.
Rosiglitazone also attenuated atherosclerosis in control mice. Treatment in these animals was associated with reductions in AT1 receptor and superoxide production and an increase in the antioxidant CuZnSOD. The beneficial effects seen in control mice may partly be caused by insulin-sensitizing effects of this agent, as has been previously reported with PPAR
agonists in high-fatfed LDLR/ mice16,17 and apo E/ mice.18
There are now a small number of clinical studies investigating the effect of PPAR
agonists in patients with and without diabetes on cardiovascular risk factors and, in particular, on endothelial function, a well-recognized marker of atherosclerosis.4547 However, although PPAR
agonism was associated with improvement in cardiovascular risk, even in those patients without diabetes, concomitant changes in insulin sensitivity and/or glycemic control as measured by fasting insulin levels, HbA1c, or the HOMA-R index were observed. Whereas those studies support our experimental findings, they still were unable to differentiate whether the effects of these PPAR
agonists on cardiovascular risk are independent of alterations in insulin sensitivity. We consider that the in vivo animal studies described have led to further characterization of the mechanisms of action of these drugs, which are now so widely administered as part of the treatment regimen for type 2 diabetes.
Further studies are required to fully elucidate the effect of PPAR
agonists on atherosclerosis. Currently, we await the outcome of a large number of long-term clinical trials, including ADOPT,48 PROACTIVE,49 and DREAM.50 These studies will greatly assist clinicians in determining the future role of PPAR
agonists in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Nevertheless, if PPAR
agonists can be shown to have vascular benefits independent of their effects on glucose homeostasis, it is predicted that these agents may also be useful in other clinical settings such as in type 1 diabetes or even in the absence of insulin resistance.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received April 19, 2003; accepted July 1, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Demozay, J.-C. Mas, S. Rocchi, and E. Van Obberghen FALDH Reverses the Deleterious Action of Oxidative Stress Induced by Lipid Peroxidation Product 4-Hydroxynonenal on Insulin Signaling in 3T3-L1 Adipocytes Diabetes, May 1, 2008; 57(5): 1216 - 1226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Z. Duan, M. G. Usher, and R. M. Mortensen Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{gamma}-Mediated Effects in the Vasculature Circ. Res., February 15, 2008; 102(3): 283 - 294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Ceolotto, A. Gallo, I. Papparella, L. Franco, E. Murphy, E. Iori, E. Pagnin, G. P. Fadini, M. Albiero, A. Semplicini, et al. Rosiglitazone Reduces Glucose-Induced Oxidative Stress Mediated by NAD(P)H Oxidase via AMPK-Dependent Mechanism Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., December 1, 2007; 27(12): 2627 - 2633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Zadelaar, R. Kleemann, L. Verschuren, J. de Vries-Van der Weij, J. van der Hoorn, H. M. Princen, and T. Kooistra Mouse Models for Atherosclerosis and Pharmaceutical Modifiers Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 2007; 27(8): 1706 - 1721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Askari, J. E. Kanter, A. M. Sherrid, D. L. Golej, A. T. Bender, J. Liu, W. A. Hsueh, J. A. Beavo, R. A. Coleman, and K. E. Bornfeldt Rosiglitazone Inhibits Acyl-CoA Synthetase Activity and Fatty Acid Partitioning to Diacylglycerol and Triacylglycerol via a Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{gamma}-Independent Mechanism in Human Arterial Smooth Muscle Cells and Macrophages Diabetes, April 1, 2007; 56(4): 1143 - 1152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Calkin, S. Giunti, K. A. Jandeleit-Dahm, T. J. Allen, M. E. Cooper, and M. C. Thomas PPAR-{alpha} and -{gamma} agonists attenuate diabetic kidney disease in the apolipoprotein E knockout mouse Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2006; 21(9): 2399 - 2405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 America |