Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2005;25:1641-1646
Published online before print May 26, 2005, doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000171983.95612.90
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/8/1641    most recent
01.ATV.0000171983.95612.90v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reifenberg, K.
Right arrow Articles by Bhakdi, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reifenberg, K.
Right arrow Articles by Bhakdi, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pathophysiology
Right arrow Genetically altered mice
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2005;25:1641.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


Atherosclerosis and Lipoproteins

Role of C-Reactive Protein in Atherogenesis

Can the Apolipoprotein E Knockout Mouse Provide the Answer?

Kurt Reifenberg; Hans-Anton Lehr; Daniela Baskal; Elena Wiese; Stephan C. Schaefer; Steven Black; David Samols; Michael Torzewski; Karl J. Lackner; Matthias Husmann; Maria Blettner; Sucharit Bhakdi

From the Central Laboratory Animal Facility (K.R., E.W.) and the Institutes of Pathology (H.-A.L., D.B., S.C.S.), Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (M.T., K.J.L.), Medical Biometry, Epidemiology, and Informatics (M.B.), and Medical Microbiology and Hygiene (M.H., S. Bhakdi), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany; and the Department of Biochemistry (S. Black, D.S.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

Correspondence to Sucharit Bhakdi, Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz Obere Zahlbacherstr 67 55131 Mainz, Germany. E-mail sbhakdi{at}uni-mainz.de


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Objective— Human C-reactive protein (CRP) was reported to accelerate atherosclerotic lesion development in male but not in female apolipoprotein E (apoE) knockout mice. Here, mice expressing rabbit CRP (rbCRP) were crossbred onto apoE knockout animals, and the effect on atherogenesis was studied.

Methods and Results— Hemolytic complement activity could not be detected in apoE knockout mice. Furthermore, in contrast to human complement, neither rabbit nor human CRP complexed to modified low-density lipoprotein–activated murine complement. At 52 weeks, rbCRP levels were similar in male and female transgenic animals. Serum cholesterol levels were equivalent in female animals irrespective of rbCRP expression, whereas rbCRP–positive males had significantly higher serum cholesterol levels than the rbCRP-negative counterparts. All mice exhibited extensive atherosclerotic lesions, as studied en face, and no differences were noted between rbCRP-negative and rbCRP-positive animals. Atherosclerotic luminal obstruction of aortic arch and first-order neck branches did not differ significantly between rbCRP-positive and rbCRP-negative mice. There was no correlation between rbCRP levels and atherosclerotic lesion formation.

Conclusions— No marked effect of rbCRP on the formation of moderately advanced atherosclerotic lesions could be discerned in the apoE knockout mouse. Because of the oddities of the mouse complement system, however, this may not be a good model to investigate the role of CRP in human atherosclerosis.

Transgenic mice expressing rabbit CRP were crossbred onto apolipoprotein E knockout animals, and the animals were monitored for the development of atherosclerotic lesions. We failed to detect a significant influence of CRP transgenesis on atherogenesis in apoE knockout mice.


Key Words: C-reactive protein • atherosclerosis • complement • transgene murine model


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
A correlation exists between C-reactive protein (CRP) serum concentrations and the risk of cardiac events in patients with coronary heart disease,1–3 but it is unknown whether the acute-phase protein simply represents a marker of inflammation4 or whether it is causally involved in atherogenesis. CRP is present in early human atheromatous plaques and colocalizes with activated complement.5 The capacity of CRP to bind to enzymatically modified low-density lipoprotein (E-LDL),6 the major target of CRP in the atherosclerotic lesion, and to activate complement7 could imply that it drives inflammation and is, hence, proatherogenic.8,9 Reports that CRP downregulates endothelial biosynthesis of nitric oxide synthase10 and stimulates the expression of endothelin 111 might appear to accord with such a contention. However, reports on proinflammatory cellular effects of CRP require confirmation because uncharacterized commercial CRP preparations were used in past studies. One effect has recently been shown to represent a sodium azide artifact.12

See page 1527

Alternatively, CRP may play a physiological role. Complement activation by CRP/E-LDL halts before the proatherogenic terminal sequence, and incomplete complement activation may be a physiological event enabling LDL to be removed from tissues,13 blunting a detrimental response to LDL retention.13–15

Murine apolipoprotein (apoE)16 and LDL receptor17 knockout strains are widely used to study inflammatory mechanisms in atherosclerosis. However, mouse CRP is a trace protein with a concentration that does not exceed 2 mg/L even after an inflammatory stimulus.18 Hence, research on CRP function in atherosclerosis currently relies on the use of transgenic mice expressing rabbit CRP (rbCRP)19 or human CRP (huCRP).20 In a recent study, introduction of a huCRP transgene into the apoE knockout mouse strain was reported to promote deposition of foam cells in the aortic valve cups in 7-month-old animals.8 The effect was restricted to male animals that expressed far higher CRP levels than did the female mice, because expression of transgenic huCRP in the construct is under strict testosterone control.21 However, data published several months prior using the same mouse strain did not appear to accord with these findings.22

Here, we report our observations on a murine strain transgenic for rbCRP and the CRP-negative apoE knockout control. Expression of the rbCRP transgene is independent of gender, and an additional inflammatory stimulus is also not required. rbCRP and huCRP are similar in structure and function. Both bind phosphocholine, C-polysaccharide, polycations, chromatin, and histones, activate complement, and protect mice from lethal challenges with pneumococci.23–29 On the basis of amino acid similarity, rbCRP30 is 83% and 86% homologous to the murine and human counterparts, respectively. huCRP is only 79% homologous to mouse rbCRP. The methodical drawbacks of transgenic expression of huCRP and rbCRP in the mouse are equivalent. The Genbank identification numbers of the murine and human cDNA used for our inquiry are gi|31982450|ref|NM_007768.2| and gi|17530542|gb|AF449713.1|AF449713, respectively.

Unexpectedly, the interactions between CRP and modified LDL and complement, as have been delineated in the human system,7,13 did not appear to be operative in the apoE knockout mouse. No marked effect of CRP expression on the development of moderately advanced atherosclerotic lesions was detected, and there was no correlation between CRP levels and the extent of atherosclerosis.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Mouse Breeds
Mice were maintained at the University of Mainz under specified pathogen free conditions. Lineage PC-12 (internal designation rbCRP) has previously been described.19,28 Briefly, the rbCRP strain carries the coding region of the rbCRP gene cloned downstream of the rat phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) promoter with liver- and kidney-specific activity.31 We used hemizygous rbCRP transgenic mice backcrossed to the C57BL/6 (B6) inbred strain for 5 generations. For rbCRP genotyping, we used primers 5'-TGTGAACATGTGGGACTAT-3' and 5'-TGAAGAAGGCAAAGCTAGG-3'. C57BL/6J-apoEtm1Unc knockout mice (internal designation apoE knockout)16 backcrossed to B6 for 10 generations were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory. The rbCRPxapoE knockout double mutants were generated by outcrossing rbCRP with apoE knockout mice and by backcrossing rbCRP-positive hybrids to the apoE parental strain. The apoE knockout and wild-type alleles could be discriminated as recommended by The Jackson Laboratory.

Diet for Activation of the PEPCK Promoter
The PEPCK promoter of the rbCRP transgene was activated by a protein-rich diet consisting of 60% caseine, 20% cellulose, 11% vegetable oil, 2% brewer’s yeast, and 7% mineral mix with vitamins.31 The mice were fed ad libitum.

Preparation of Aorta and Neck Vessels
Mice were euthanized at the age of 20 and 52 weeks and fixed in 4% buffered formaldehyde. Hearts and aortas were resected en bloc down to the iliac bifurcation. The aortic arch was dissected and 1-mm long rings of the truncus brachiocephalicus, the aortic arch and the left subclavian artery were oriented in paraffin blocks, serially sectioned (approximately two hundred 4-µm sections per sample) and stained with hematoxylin/eosin. The rest of the aortae were stained with Sudan IV as previously described,32 and photographed with a 12 megapixel digital camera (DXM 1200, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) at a total magnification of 40-fold, thus yielding high resolution images ({approx}30 MB; see Figure 4).



View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Representative atherosclerotic lesions seen in rbCRP-negative and rbCRP-positive apoE knockout mice 52 weeks of age. A and B, Representative histological sections through the left subclavian artery (A) and the aortic arch (B). C, Sudan IV–stained aorta en face. The histomorphological characteristics of the atherosclerotic lesions were identical in both groups of animals, consisting of foam cells and lipid cores with cholesterol crystals (arrows) and focal mineralizations, separated from the blood stream by fine fibrous caps. None of the lesions exhibited lipid lakes. Likewise, no differences were seen in terms of inflammatory and histiocytic cell infiltrations between lesions of rbCRP-positive and rbCRP-negative mice. Finally, and in agreement with previous observations by our own group and by others,41 we did see a similar frequency and toporegional distribution of chondroid-like changes in the atherosclerotic lesions, the exact nature of which remains unknown. Taken together, virtually all lesions on rbCRP-negative and rbCPR-positive mice corresponded to Stary classification type V. Asterisks demonstrate characteristic chondroid-like lesions found preferably in advanced mouse atherosclerotic lesions.41 The space bars depict distances of 500 µm for the histological sections (A and B) and 0.5 cm for the en face image (C).

Image Analysis
Atherosclerotic lesions en face were quantified on digitized photos using Photoshop-based image analysis (Adobe Systems Inc, San Jose, Calif).32,33 Images of histological sections were taken with a diagnostic microscope and a high-resolution camera (DXM 1200, Nikon) and imported into Photoshop and obstructive plaques quantified as a fraction of the vessel lumen. For that purpose, atherosclerotic lesions were manually marked and the number of pixels quantified. To correct for the noncylindrical geometry of the partially collapsed vessel rings, vessel lumen was calculated from the length of the inner vessel circumference as measured in Photoshop. Plaque area was expressed as percent luminal obstruction.

rbCRP Binding Assay
Serum rbCRP levels were determined by ELISA as described.29,34

Determination of Serum Cholesterol and Fatty Acids
Murine sera diluted 1:3 with physiological saline were subjected to commercial cholesterol (CHOD-PAP, Roche Diagnostics) and triglyceride (GPO-PAP, Roche Diagnostics) assays.

Hemolytic Complement Assay
Hemolysis tests to assess murine complement activity have been notoriously difficult to establish; therefore, we developed a novel assay. Staphylococcal {alpha}-toxin (SAT) is a protein bacteria toxin that, at concentrations >200 nmol/L, binds nonspecifically, in a nonsaturable manner, and irreversibly to rabbit erythrocytes. A single amino-acid substitution (arginine for histidine at residue 35; H35R) renders the toxin nonlytic, enabling cells to be coated with ample amounts of the mutant toxin without ensuing hemolysis.35 A SAT-specific polyclonal antibody can subsequently be applied and the hypersensitized erythrocytes efficiently lysed by complement of any origin, including the mouse. For this a 5% erythrocyte suspension in veronal-buffered saline (VBS) was incubated with 30 µg/mL H35R SAT for 30 minutes at 24°C. Cells were pelleted, resuspended in VBS to 3%, and 10 µL of anti-SAT serum were added per milliliter. Twenty-five microliters of hypersensitized cells were incubated with 25 µL of mouse serum, and hemolysis was determined after 1 hour (37°C) by reading the absorption of the supernatants at 412 nm.

Complement Consumption Assay
Enzymatic modification of human LDL was performed as described.13,36 The complement consumption assay was carried out as described.13 Briefly, a human serum pool containing <1 µg/mL CRP was diluted 10-fold with VBS, and aliquots of 50 µL were transferred into reaction tubes. Recombinant huCRP (Calbiochem) and human E-LDL were added to the given final concentrations, and the samples were incubated for 60 minutes at 37°C. Subsequently antibody-coated sheep erythrocytes were added, and the degree of hemolysis was determined after 60 minutes by measuring the absorbance of the supernatants at 412 nm. Hemolysis curves were inverted to reflect complement consumption.

For adaptation to the murine system, B6 sera were used instead of human serum samples and, in some of the experiments, rbCRP purified as described29 was used instead of huCRP. These assays were developed using the SAT-hypersensitized rabbit erythrocytes.

Statistical Analysis
Body weights and serum parameters of rbCRPxapoE knockout animals were compared by t tests (Table I, available online at http://atvb.ahajournals.org). Correlation coefficients were calculated between serum rbCRP concentration and atherosclerosis data. When histological data were compared between rbCRP subgroups, parametric t tests and, to compensate for a potential lack of normal distribution, nonparametric Wilcoxon tests were applied. Further, serum cholesterol values were taken into account in a regression model (ANOVA) where the serum cholesterol concentration was used as quantitative variable.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Lack of Detectable Hemolytic Complement Activity in ApoE Knockout Mice
The apoE knockout strain used in our study had been backcrossed to the B6 strain for 10 generations; therefore, testing the serum hemolytic activity of 2 normocholesterolemic B6 control mice and 2 apoE knockout mice was performed originally just on a precautionary basis. Sera of the B6 control mice had normal hemolytic titers (Figure 1A). However, sera of both apoE knockout mice completely lacked detectable hemolytic complement activity (Figure 1B). We subsequently tested sera from each animal in this study as well as sera from 5 nontransgenic apoE knockout animals and found a hemolytic titer of zero in each case.



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Lack of hemolytic activity of apoE knockout serum. Hypersensitized rabbit erythrocytes were incubated with various concentrations of C57BL/6 (A) and apoE–/– knockout (B) sera at the given concentrations. The complement system is intact in the C57BL/6 strain,47 and total hemolysis was observed with undiluted serum (A). In contrast, no hemolytic activity could be observed with the apoE knockout serum (B). Data shown represent the means of 2 independent determinations. Similar absence of hemolytic activity was confirmed in all other mice entered in this study.

Human and Rabbit CRPs Fail to Augment E-LDL–Dependent Activation of Murine Complement
Exploratory mixing experiments indicated that lack of hemolytic complement activity in apoE knockout mice was attributable to the presence of an inhibitor. Because the inhibitor might not necessarily be present in tissues, we tested whether CRP would augment E-LDL–dependent complement activation in normal mouse serum. E-LDL activates human complement via a highly efficient CRP-dependent (Figure 2A, open circles) and a less-efficient CRP-independent mechanism (Figure 2A, closed circles). The same experiment was conducted with mouse B6 serum. High concentrations of E-LDL alone activated murine complement (Figure 2, closed circles). However, neither huCRP (Figure 2B, open circles) nor rbCRP (not shown) had any augmenting influence on murine complement consumption. The experiment was reproduced with 3 different batches of recombinant huCRP.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Lack of huCRP to augment activation of mouse complement. Dose-dependent human (A) and murine (B) complement consumption induced by E-LDL in the presence or absence of 10 µg/mL huCRP. In human serum (A) huCRP-dependent complement consumption could be detected at E-LDL concentrations of >6 µg/mL ({circ}), whereas E-LDL alone was only capable of activating complement at concentrations >50 µg/mL ({OV0321}). In contrast, huCRP did not augment activation of mouse complement by E-LDL (B).

Induction of rbCRP Transgene Expression by a Protein-Rich Diet
Starting at the age of 8 weeks, rbCRPxapoE knockout offspring mice were fed a protein-rich diet to drive rbCRP transgene expression.31 Body weights of rbCRPxapoE knockout mice exhibited significant gender differences (Table I) and hence rbCRP serum concentrations and all further data were not only assorted according to genotype but also to gender. rbCRP was absent in the rbCRP negative mice but expressed at high serum levels independent of gender in the transgenic animals (Table I). Two rbCRP-positive apoE–/– mice did not express the transgene and were excluded from the study. Overall, expression of rbCRP observed here, including the occasional lack of expression, was in accord with the literature.19,28

Development of Hypercholesterolemia in ApoE Knockout Mice
At 52 weeks, serum triglyceride levels of apoE knockout mice barely exceeded physiological murine values. In contrast, serum cholesterol concentrations were increased over those in sex-matched apoE+/– controls of the same rbCRP genotype to a similar degree as that of apoE knockout mice on a balanced diet.37,38 Whereas cholesterol levels in all female animals were similar (Table I), cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations of rbCRP-positive males were significantly (t test) higher than those of rbCRP-negative males (Table I). A similar trend was noted after introduction of a huCRP transgene into apoE knockout mice,8 but the differences did not attain statistical significance, presumably because of the shorter duration of the experiment (6 months versus 12 months in this study).

rbCRP Transgenesis Does Not Augment Atherogenesis in ApoE Knockout Mice at 20 Weeks
Five rbCRP-negative and 5 rbCRP-positive male and 7 rbCRP-negative and 4 rbCRP-positive apoE knockout female mice were euthanized at 20 weeks. In each group, only 1 to 2 animals presented with minimal atherosclerotic changes (<3% of aortic surface and <5% luminal obstruction), whereas the remaining animals showed no atherosclerotic lesions at all. No statistically significant differences were noted between any groups.

rbCRP Transgenesis Does Not Augment Plaque Development in the Aorta of 52-Week-Old ApoE Knockout Mice As Studied En Face
No atherosclerosis was detected in apoE+/– mice. In contrast, all apoE knockout mice exhibited extensive aortic lesions at 52 weeks, and the mean lesion size was significantly more extensive in males compared with females (Figure 3A). However, neither by using t test nor Wilcoxon test nor after adjusting for serum cholesterol in the regression analysis (ANOVA) were any differences in plaque area found between rbCRP-negative and rbCRP-positive mice of either sex (Figure 3A).



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Quantitative analyses of atherosclerotic lesions in rbCRP-negative and rbCRP-positive apoE knockout mice 52 weeks of age. A, Aorta en face. The aortic plaque area of apoE knockout mice was analyzed by computer-based image analysis of aortic preparations en face. Irrespective of gender, no statistically significant (ANOVA) differences in the size of aortic lesions were found between the rbCRP-positive and the rbCRP-negative apoE knockout mice. B, Aortic arch obstruction. Obstruction was calculated in the murine aortic arch using morphometric analysis of serial histological sections. The degree of obstruction was increased in the rbCRP-positive males and females as compared with the rbCRP-negative controls; however, the values did not attain statistical significance (ANOVA). C, Neck vessel obstruction. In the first-order branches of the aortic arch (right, brachiocephalic arch; left, subclavian artery), the rbCRP-positive males and females exhibited a higher degree of luminal obstruction as compared with the rbCRP-negative controls of the same sex. However, the differences observed were not statistically significant (ANOVA). Data are means±SD. n.s. indicates not significant.

Quantification of Luminal Vessel Obstruction
The results of these analyses are shown in Figure 3B and 3C. No histomorphological differences were detected between atherosclerotic lesions of rbCRP-negative and rbCRP-positive mice (Figure 4). By using parametric t test, the differences of aortic and neck vessel obstruction between rbCRP-positive and rbCRP-negative mice were found to be statistically significant for the males but not for the females. These results were confirmed by data analysis with the nonparametric Wilcoxon test. However, when adjusting for the influence of serum cholesterol in the regression analysis (ANOVA), the results between the rbCRP-positive and rbCRP-negative mice were no longer significant, indicating that cholesterol was an important confounding factor in our study. The trend toward increased atherosclerosis in rbCRP-positive animals was more pronounced in males, where the probability values (ANOVA) reached 0.07 and 0.10 for aortic and neck vessel obstruction, respectively. When a regression analysis of CRP levels and vessel obstruction was performed, no correlation was observed in male animals (Figure I, available online at http://atvb.ahajournals.org) or female animals; in the latter, correlation coefficients between CRP levels and obstruction of aortic arch and neck vessel were –0.024 and –0.002, respectively.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Two studies have previously addressed the possible significance of CRP in atherogenesis by expressing huCRP in apoE knockout mice.8,22 Whereas Hirschfield et al22 detected no proatherogenic effect, Paul et al8 reported an increase in lesion size in the aortic arch of male mice and concluded that CRP is atherogenic. In that study,8 only transgenic huCRP male mice had increased atherosclerotic lesions, and the effect was observed in naive animals as well as in mice subjected to a strong inflammatory stimulus (turpentine injections). For unknown reasons, the CRP levels were extraordinarily high as compared with other studies using the same transgenic strain,21,39,40 suggesting a concomitant inflammatory stimulus of unknown origin. In this context, inflammatory stimuli themselves accelerate atherogenesis,32 and conclusions regarding the specific role of CRP in turpentine-treated animals cannot be drawn if appropriate controls are lacking. Of note, although female transgenic mice expressed low CRP levels, these were nevertheless in the range that is considered a risk factor in humans; however, no differences between the CRP-positive and -negative animals were seen.8

In addition to these caveats, animals in the study by Paul et al8 were euthanized at an early age (29 weeks), where genuine atherosclerotic lesions had not yet been formed, and only microscopic histiocytic deposits in the aortic valve cups were taken as the basis for quantification of atherosclerosis. Marginal differences in lesion size were noted only in the aortic route, whereas lesions in the remainder of the aorta exhibited no differences. The finding that male CRP-transgenic mice had more C3 deposits in the lesions8 is also open to interpretation, because current immunohistochemical staining methods permit no differentiation between activated and nonactivated murine complement components. For the same reason, mere detection of CRP in the murine lesions does not demonstrate its complement-activating capacity. In contrast, positive stainings for C3dg and C5b-9-neoantigens constitute unequivocal evidence for complement activation in human lesions.7,13

Experiments with mice expressing rbCRP do not harbor the problem of testosterone and inflammation-dependency of the construct. Atherosclerotic lesion development is slow in the apoE knockout mouse, and only very small lesions begin to appear after 20 weeks. After 52 weeks, moderately advanced lesions developed that corresponded to stage V of the Stary classification. We discerned no proatherogenic effect of CRP at this stage. For unknown reasons, male CRP transgenic mice had significantly higher cholesterol levels than all other groups, which could explain the increase in lesion size that was detected when vascular obstruction was quantified in first-order branches as proposed by Rosenfeld et al.41 This observation would have been missed by conventional en face plaque measurement alone. The group size in our study would have permitted only detection of strong CRP effects, and small differences at this or at earlier stages of atherogenesis might have been missed. This potential shortcoming is common to most animal experiments. Moreover, current discussions on the possible atherogenic effects of CRP in humans relate to consequences in late-stage disease that might be mediated by far lower CRP levels than expressed here.

The oddities of mouse complement, particularly with regard to CRP-dependent activation by lipoproteins, surfaced when we tested whether murine complement would be activated by modified LDL and whether this process would be amplified by CRP as found previously with human complement.13 By using erythrocytes hypersensitized with a bacterial protein toxin, a hemolysis target was obtained that was readily lysed by mouse complement. To our surprise, the apoE knockout mice completely lacked hemolytic complement activity. Earlier work has uncovered an inhibitory effect of mouse fibronectin42 and the existence of an inhibitor of the terminal complement sequence,43 which partially explains the notorious inefficiency of murine complement.44 Pilot mixing experiments indicated that lipemic sera from apoE knockout mice contain either larger amounts of these inhibitors or additional inhibitory factors that await future identification.

Because the putative inhibitor might not diffuse into atherosclerotic lesions, we determined whether the pattern of complement activation by E-LDL±CRP as found in human serum13 could be reproduced in normal murine serum. At high concentrations, modified LDL was indeed capable of consuming murine complement, but complement activation was not augmented by CRP.

All of our present findings thus uncover the disturbing facts that the interactions among CRP, complement, and LDL, as have been delineated in humans, may not exist similarly in mice. It can naturally not be excluded that mouse CRP might be active, but the incapacity of transgenically expressed CRP to execute 1 of its primary functions places obvious constraints on the validity of this animal model. Hence, any effect of CRP in the apoE knockout mouse is probably independent of the complement system. Vice versa, it must be conceded that any lack of effect as observed here might be attributable to this shortcoming.

It has been reported that C3 deficiency protects LDL receptor knockout mice against atherosclerosis.45 This finding would be in accord with the earlier observation that C6 deficiency in rabbits is also protective46 and need not stand in conflict with the present work. Preliminary data from this laboratory indicate that hemolytic complement activity in LDL receptor knockout mice is not nil and, as shown above, higher concentrations of E-LDL do activate mouse complement independent of CRP. In summary, caution should be exercised when extrapolating observations in genetically engineered mouse models with incompletely characterized physiological alterations to the situation in human disease, and we believe that a definitive statement regarding the role of CRP in human atherogenesis should be deferred at this stage.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Bh 2/2-3) and by grant 8312-38 62 61/527 of the "Stiftung Rheinland-Pfalz für Innovation." The excellent technical assistance of Antonietta Valentino, Claudia Braun, Petra Nusser, and Sybille Ott is gratefully acknowledged.


*    Footnotes
 
K.R. and H.-A.L. contributed equally to this work.

Received December 23, 2004; accepted April 29, 2005.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Kuller LH, Tracy RP, Shaten J, Meilahn EN. Relation of C-reactive protein and coronary heart disease in the MRFIT nested case-control study. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Am J Epidemiol. 1996; 144: 537–547.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Ridker PM, Cushman M, Stampfer MJ, Tracy RP, Hennekens CH. Inflammation, aspirin, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy men. N Eng J Med. 1997; 336: 973–979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Danesh J, Wheeler JG, Hirschfield GM, Eda S, Eiriksdottir G, Rumley A, Lowe GD, Pepys MB, Gudnason V. C-reactive protein and other circulating markers of inflammation in the prediction of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350: 1387–1397.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Hackam DG, Anand SS. Emerging risk factors for atherosclerotic vascular disease: a critical review of the evidence. JAMA. 2003; 290: 932–940.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Torzewski J, Torzewski M, Bowyer DE, Frohlich M, Koenig W, Waltenberger J, Fitzsimmons C, Hombach V. C-reactive protein frequently colocalizes with the terminal complement complex in the intima of early atherosclerotic lesions of human coronary arteries. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998; 18: 1386–1392.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Bhakdi S, Dorweiler B, Kirchmann R, Torzewski J, Weise E, Tranum-Jensen J, Walev I, Wieland E. On the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: enzymatic transformation of human low density lipoprotein to an atherogenic moiety. J Exp Med. 1995; 182: 1959–1971.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Bhakdi S, Torzewski M, Klouche M, Hemmes M. Complement and atherogenesis: binding of CRP to degraded, nonoxidized LDL enhances complement activation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999; 19: 2348–2354.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Paul A, Ko KW, Li L, Yechoor V, McCrory MA, Szalai AJ, Chan L. C-reactive protein accelerates the progression of atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Circulation. 2004; 109: 647–655.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Pepys MB, Hirschfield GM. C-reactive protein and atherothrombosis. Ital Heart J. 2001; 2: 196–199.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Venugopal SK, Devaraj S, Yuhanna I, Shaul P, Jialal I. Demonstration that C-reactive protein decreases eNOS expression and bioactivity in human aortic endothelial cells. Circulation. 2002; 106: 1439–1441.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Verma S, Li SH, Badiwala MV, Weisel RD, Fedak PW, Li RK, Dhillon B, Mickle DA. Endothelin antagonism and interleukin-6 inhibition attenuate the proatherogenic effects of C-reactive protein. Circulation. 2002; 105: 1890–1896.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. van den Berg CW, Taylor KE, Lang D. C-reactive protein-induced in vitro vasorelaxation is an artefact caused by the presence of sodium azide in commercial preparations. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24: e168–e171.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Bhakdi S, Torzewski M, Paprotka K, Schmitt S, Barsoom H, Suriyaphol P, Han SR, Lackner KJ, Husmann M. Possible protective role for C-reactive protein in atherogenesis: complement activation by modified lipoproteins halts before detrimental terminal sequence. Circulation. 2004; 109: 1870–1876.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Bhakdi S, Lackner KJ, Han SR, Torzewski M, Husmann M. Beyond cholesterol: the enigma of atherosclerosis revisited. Thromb Haemost. 2004; 91: 639–645.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Williams KJ, Tabas I. The response-to-retention hypothesis of early atherogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995; 15: 551–561.[Free Full Text]

16. Piedrahita JA, Zhang SH, Hagaman JR, Oliver PM, Maeda N. Generation of mice carrying a mutant apolipoprotein E gene inactivated by gene targeting in embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992; 89: 4471–4475.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Ishibashi S, Brown M, Goldstein J, Gerard RD, Hammer RE, Herz J. Hypercholesterolemia in LDL receptor knockout mice and its reversal by adenovirus-mediated gene delivery. J Clin Invest. 1993; 92: 883–893.

18. Pepys MB, Hirschfield GM. C-reactive protein: a critical update. J Clin Invest. 2003; 111: 1805–1812.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Xia D, Samols D. Transgenic mice expressing rabbit C-reactive protein are resistant to endotoxemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94: 2575–2580.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Ciliberto G, Arcone R, Wagner EF, Ruther U. Inducible and tissue-specific expression of human C-reactive protein in transgenic mice. EMBO J. 1987; 6: 4017–4022.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Szalai AJ, van Ginkel FW, Dalrymple SA, Murray R, McGhee JR, Volanakis JE. Testosterone and IL-6 requirements for human C-reactive protein gene expression in transgenic mice. J Immunol. 1998; 160: 5294–5299.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Hirschfield GM, Gallimore R, Gilbertson JA, Benson M, Pepys MB. Systemic inflammation and atherogenesis in apoE knockout mice expressing transgenic human C-reactive protein. Circulation. 2003; 108 (suppl IV): IV–41Abstract.

23. Bach BA, Gewurz H, Osmand AP. C-reative protein in the rabbit: isolation, characterization and binding affinity to phosphocholine. Immunochemistry. 1977; 14: 215–219.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Oliveira EB, Gotschlich EC, Liu TY. Comparative studies on the binding properties of human and rabbit C- reactive proteins. J Immunol. 1980; 124: 1396–1402.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Robey FA, Jones KD, Tanaka T, Liu TY. Binding of C-reactive protein to chromatin and nucleosome core particles. A possible physiological role of C-reactive protein. J Biol Chem. 1984; 259: 7311–7316.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Horowitz J, Volanakis JE, Briles DE. Blood clearance of Streptococcus pneumoniae by C-reactive protein. J Immunol. 1987; 138: 2598–2603.[Abstract]

27. Dougherty TJ, Gewurz H, Siegel JN. Preferential binding and aggregation of rabbit C-reactive protein with arginine-rich proteins. Mol Immunol. 1991; 28: 1113–1120.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Lin CS, Xia D, Yun JS, Wagner T, Magnuson T, Mold C, Samols D. Expression of rabbit C-reactive protein in transgenic mice. Immunol Cell Biol. 1995; 73: 521–531.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Black S, Agrawal A, Samols D. The phosphocholine and the polycation-binding sites on rabbit C-reactive protein are structurally and functionally distinct. Mol Immunol. 2003; 39: 1045–1054.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Hu S, Miller S, Samols D. Cloning and characterization of the gene for rabbit C-reactive protein. Biochemistry. 1986; 25: 7834–7839.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. McGrane MM, de Vente J, Yun J, Bloom J, Park E, Wynshaw-Boris A, Wagner T, Rottman FM, Hanson RW. Tissue-specific expression and dietary regulation of a chimeric phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase/bovine growth hormone gene in transgenic mice. J Biol Chem. 1988; 263: 11443–11451.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Lehr HA, Sagban TA, Ihling C, Zahringer U, Hungerer KD, Blumrich M, Reifenberg K, Bhakdi S. Immunopathogenesis of atherosclerosis: endotoxin accelerates atherosclerosis in rabbits on hypercholesterolemic diet. Circulation. 2001; 104: 914–920.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Lehr HA, van der Loos CM, Teeling P, Gown AM. Complete chromogen separation and analysis in double immunohistochemical stains using Photoshop-based image analysis. J Histochem Cytochem. 1999; 47: 119–126.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Agrawal A, Shrive AK, Greenhough TJ, Volanakis JE. Topology and structure of the C1q-binding site on C-reactive protein. J Immunol. 2001; 166: 3998–4004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Jursch R, Hildebrand A, Hobom G, Tranum-Jensen J, Ward R, Kehoe M, Bhakdi S. Histidine residues near the N terminus of staphylococcal alpha-toxin as reporters of regions that are critical for oligomerization and pore formation. Infect Immun. 1994; 62: 2249–2256.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Klouche M, Gottschling S, Gerl V, Hell W, Husmann M, Dorweiler B, Messner M, Bhakdi S. Atherogenic properties of enzymatically degraded LDL: selective induction of MCP-1 and cytotoxic effects on human macrophages. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998; 18: 1376–1385.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Zhang SH, Reddick RL, Piedrahita JA, Maeda N. Spontaneous hypercholesterolemia and arterial lesions in mice lacking apolipoprotein E. Science. 1992; 258: 468–471.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Zhang SH, Reddick RL, Burkey B, Maeda N. Diet-induced atherosclerosis in mice heterozygous and homozygous for apolipoprotein E gene disruption. J Clin Invest. 1994; 94: 937–945.

39. Szalai AJ, Briles DE, Volanakis JE. Human C-reactive protein is protective against fatal Streptococcus pneumoniae infection in transgenic mice. J Immunol. 1995; 155: 2557–2563.[Abstract]

40. Hirschfield GM, Herbert J, Kahan MC, Pepys MB. Human C-reactive protein does not protect against acute lipopolysaccharide challenge in mice. J Immunol. 2003; 171: 6046–6051.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

41. Rosenfeld ME, Polinsky P, Virmani R, Kauser K, Rubanyi G, Schwartz SM. Advanced atherosclerotic lesions in the innominate artery of the ApoE knockout mouse. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000; 20: 2587–2592.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Hitsumoto Y, Okada M, Makino H. Inhibition of human and mouse complement-dependent hemolytic activity by mouse fibronectin. Immunopharmacology. 1999; 42: 203–208.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

43. Sassi F, Hugo F, Muhly M, Khaled A, Bhakdi S. A reason for the cytolytic inefficiency of murine serum. Immunology. 1987; 62: 145–147.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

44. Rosenberg LT, Tachibana DK. Activity of mouse complement. J Immunol. 1962; 89: 861–867.

45. Buono C, Come CE, Witztum JL, Maguire GF, Connelly PW, Carroll M, Lichtman AH. Influence of C3 deficiency on atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2002; 105: 3025–3031.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

46. Schmiedt W, Kinscherf R, Deigner HP, Kamencic H, Nauen O, Kilo J, Oelert H, Metz J, Bhakdi S. Complement C6 deficiency protects against diet-induced atherosclerosis in rabbits. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998; 18: 1790–1795.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

47. D’Eustachio P, Kristensen T, Wetsel RA, Riblet R, Taylor BA, Tack BF. Chromosomal location of the genes encoding complement components C5 and factor H in the mouse. J Immunol. 1986; 137: 3990–3995.[Abstract]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
M. A. Ortiz, G. L. Campana, J. R. Woods, G. Boguslawski, M. J. Sosa, C. L. Walker, and C. A. Labarrere
Continuously-Infused Human C-Reactive Protein Is Neither Proatherosclerotic Nor Proinflammatory in Apolipoprotein E-Deficient Mice
Experimental Biology and Medicine, June 1, 2009; 234(6): 624 - 631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
T. B. Grammer, W. Marz, W. Renner, B. O. Bohm, and M. M. Hoffmann
C-reactive protein genotypes associated with circulating C-reactive protein but not with angiographic coronary artery disease: the LURIC study
Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2009; 30(2): 170 - 182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. K. Singh, M. V. Suresh, D. C. Prayther, J. P. Moorman, A. E. Rusinol, and A. Agrawal
C-Reactive Protein-Bound Enzymatically Modified Low-Density Lipoprotein Does Not Transform Macrophages into Foam Cells
J. Immunol., March 15, 2008; 180(6): 4316 - 4322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Kovacs, P. Tornvall, R. Nilsson, J. Tegner, A. Hamsten, and J. Bjorkegren
Human C-reactive protein slows atherosclerosis development in a mouse model with human-like hypercholesterolemia
PNAS, August 21, 2007; 104(34): 13768 - 13773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
J. Ryu, C. W. Lee, J.-A. Shin, C.-S. Park, J. J. Kim, S.-J. Park, and K. H. Han
Fc{gamma}RIIa mediates C-reactive protein-induced inflammatory responses of human vascular smooth muscle cells by activating NADPH oxidase 4
Cardiovasc Res, August 1, 2007; 75(3): 555 - 565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
E. Grad, M. Golomb, I. Mor-Yosef, N. Koroukhov, C. Lotan, E. R. Edelman, and H. D. Danenberg
Transgenic expression of human C-reactive protein suppresses endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression and bioactivity after vascular injury
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): H489 - H495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
C. Rocker, D. E. Manolov, E. V. Kuzmenkina, K. Tron, H. Slatosch, J. Torzewski, and G. U. Nienhaus
Affinity of C-Reactive Protein toward Fc{gamma}RI Is Strongly Enhanced by the {gamma}-Chain
Am. J. Pathol., February 1, 2007; 170(2): 755 - 763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
J. P Casas, T. Shah, J. Cooper, E. Hawe, A. D McMahon, D. Gaffney, C. J Packard, D. S O'Reilly, I. Juhan-Vague, J. S Yudkin, et al.
Insight into the nature of the CRP-coronary event association using Mendelian randomization
Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2006; 35(4): 922 - 931.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
E. Paffen and M. P.M. deMaat
C-reactive protein in atherosclerosis: A causal factor?
Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 2006; 71(1): 30 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
B. M. Scirica, D. A. Morrow, S. Verma, S. Devaraj, I. Jialal, B. M. Scirica, D. A. Morrow, S. Verma, S. Devaraj, and I. Jialal
The Verdict Is Still Out
Circulation, May 2, 2006; 113(17): 2128 - 2151.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
A. Tedgui and Z. Mallat
Cytokines in Atherosclerosis: Pathogenic and Regulatory Pathways
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2006; 86(2): 515 - 581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. V. Suresh, S. K. Singh, D. A. Ferguson Jr., and A. Agrawal
Role of the Property of C-Reactive Protein to Activate the Classical Pathway of Complement in Protecting Mice from Pneumococcal Infection
J. Immunol., April 1, 2006; 176(7): 4369 - 4374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
S.-R. Ji, Y. Wu, L. A. Potempa, Y.-H. Liang, and J. Zhao
Effect of Modified C-Reactive Protein on Complement Activation: A Possible Complement Regulatory Role of Modified or Monomeric C-Reactive Protein in Atherosclerotic Lesions
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2006; 26(4): 935 - 941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
R. Bisoendial, R. Birjmohun, T. Keller, S. van Leuven, H. Levels, M. Levi, J. Kastelein, and E. Stroes

Circ. Res., December 9, 2005; 97(12): e115 - e116.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
C. Mineo, A. K. Gormley, I. S. Yuhanna, S. Osborne-Lawrence, L. L. Gibson, L. Hahner, R. V. Shohet, S. Black, J. E. Salmon, D. Samols, et al.
Fc{gamma}RIIB Mediates C-Reactive Protein Inhibition of Endothelial NO Synthase
Circ. Res., November 25, 2005; 97(11): 1124 - 1131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes and Vascular Disease ResearchHome page
A. M Carter
Inflammation, thrombosis and acute coronary syndromes
Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research, October 1, 2005; 2(3): 113 - 121.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
J. Torzewski
C-Reactive Protein and Atherogenesis: New Insights from Established Animal Models
Am. J. Pathol., October 1, 2005; 167(4): 923 - 925.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
H. Sun, T. Koike, T. Ichikawa, K. Hatakeyama, M. Shiomi, B. Zhang, S. Kitajima, M. Morimoto, T. Watanabe, Y. Asada, et al.
C-Reactive Protein in Atherosclerotic Lesions: Its Origin and Pathophysiological Significance
Am. J. Pathol., October 1, 2005; 167(4): 1139 - 1148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
E. T.H. Yeh
A New Perspective on the Biology of C-Reactive Protein
Circ. Res., September 30, 2005; 97(7): 609 - 611.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
J. Nilsson
CRP--Marker or Maker of Cardiovascular Disease?
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 2005; 25(8): 1527 - 1528.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/8/1641    most recent
01.ATV.0000171983.95612.90v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reifenberg, K.
Right arrow Articles by Bhakdi, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reifenberg, K.
Right arrow Articles by Bhakdi, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pathophysiology
Right arrow Genetically altered mice