| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brief Reviews |
From the Department of Immunology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, Calif. Current address for Mattias Belting is Lund University, Department of Oncology, BMC C13, SE-222 84, Lund, Sweden.
Correspondence to Wolfram Ruf, MD, Department of Immunology, SP258, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 N Torrey Pines Rd, La Jolla, CA 92037. E-mail ruf{at}scripps.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Activation of coagulation precedes or coincides with angiogenesis in wound healing and post-ischemic tissue regeneration. Advanced cancer is associated with a hypercoagulable state, and tissue factor expression by cancer cells has received widespread attention. Here we review the molecular mechanisms of tissue factor pathways in angiogenesis and tumorigenesis with emphasis on the intriguing role for tissue factor cytoplasmic domain signaling.
Key Words: protease activated receptors metastasis integrin
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
See cover
These TF-dependent, upstream signaling events are also mediated by the PAR family of G-proteincoupled receptors, in particular PAR1 and PAR2. The TF-VIIa complex activates PAR2 and the product of initiation of coagulation, Xa, while still assembled in the transient ternary TF-VIIa-Xa complex, signals through PAR1 or PAR2. Both upstream PAR-mediated signaling and downstream coagulation events may thus contribute to cancer biology. In vivo, thrombin is generally considered to be the physiological activator of PARs in tumor biology and angiogenesis. We have recently provided in vivo evidence that PAR2, which is not cleaved by thrombin, is linked to TF-dependent angiogenesis.3 Thus, broader roles of TF-initiated coagulation emerge in the regulation of cancer progression and angiogenesis. In this brief review, we will address pathways by which TF supports metastasis, tumor growth, and angiogenesis. The accumulating data indicate that TF expressed by tumors cells as well as host cells initiates direct or indirect signaling events that support tumor development by distinct mechanisms (Figure 1).
|
| Coagulation and Metastasis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several studies have established a role for fibrinogen as a scaffolding molecule for cell migration and for the binding of promigratory and angiogenic growth factors, most importantly vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).5 However, challenging the general view that fibrinogen contributes to tumor stroma formation and angiogenesis, there was no noticeable difference in tumor growth and vessel density when comparing wild-type and fibrinogen-deficient mice.6 Moreover, granulation tissue formation and angiogenesis during wound healing, ie, normal tissue regeneration, appear to be little influenced by fibrinogen deficiency. However, fibrinogen plays an important role in tumor cell dissemination to establish lymph node as well as hematogenous metastases to the lung, which in part involves stabilizing the platelet thrombus that encases and protects arrested tumor cells.7
Fibrin generation in hematogenous metastasis is the result of coagulation activation by tumor cellexpressed TF that leads to thrombin generation.8 Is the sole role of TF in metastasis to generate fibrin that stabilizes interactions of the arrested tumor cell in the target organ? Several lines of evidence argue against this simplified concept. Pretreatment of tumor cells with thrombin changes their adhesive behavior and increases pulmonary metastasis. Signaling by thrombin is implicated because metastasis can similarly be enhanced with specific nonproteolytic agonist peptides for the thrombin receptor PAR1.9 The primary target of thrombin-dependent PAR1 signaling is the tumor cell. Host cell thrombin responses appear to be of lesser importance, because tumor cells metastasize with high efficiency in PAR1-deficient mice.10
Thrombin influences at least 2 important pathways in tumor cells. Thrombin-dependent PAR1 signaling induces proliferation of metastatic tumor cells,11 and at low doses thrombin has been shown to enhance survival of tumor cells,12 consistent with findings in other cell types.13 Although at higher doses thrombin can induce apoptosis, one possible function of thrombin is thus modulation of apoptosis during metastasis. So far there is no in vivo data to support this concept. On the other hand, thrombin signaling through PAR1 influences tumor cell motility. In a crosstalk of the PAR1 cytoplasmic tail with
Vß5 integrin the migration of tumor cells can be enhanced.14 However, thrombin has also been shown to reduce breast cancer motility,15 and coagulation activation is important for tumor cell adhesive spreading, which may counteract motility at sites of metastatic tumor implantation.16 In addition, a potential signaling crosstalk between PAR1 and PAR2 in tumor cell metastasis further complicates the picture. Chemokinetic effects of thrombin on metastatic melanoma cells were not reproduced by stimulation with PAR1 agonist peptides. Intriguingly, combined treatment with PAR1 and PAR2 agonist peptides recapitulated the thrombin effect on migration, a result that was confirmed in prostate cancer cells.17 Because metastasis was enhanced by PAR2 stimulation, thrombins prometastatic effects on tumor cells may involve cross-activation of PAR2. The tethered ligand sequence of PAR1 can activate PAR2, and cross-activation of PAR2 by thrombin-cleaved PAR1 has been suggested for endothelial cells.18 Thus, although thrombin signaling is clearly important in metastasis, additional studies are required to fully define the relative importance of underlying signaling pathways in vivo.
Regulation of cell motility is a possible pathway by which TF directly influences tumor cell metastasis. Experimental hematogenous metastasis is dependent on TF-VIIa driven thrombin generation as well as TF cytoplasmic domain signaling.19,20 We have recently demonstrated that the TF cytoplasmic domain is a negative regulator of cell migration mediated by the integrin
3ß1.21 Indeed, integrin
3ß1 plays an important role in metastatic arrest to patches of laminin-5 exposed between endothelial cells in target organs.22 These in vivo imaging studies of metastatic arrest indicate that spreading of the cells, rather than migration and extravasation across the endothelium, is a key determinant for tumor cell survival during early stages of metastasis that are also dependent on thrombin.23 TF cytoplasmic domain signaling does not interfere with adhesion and spreading on laminin-5, but selectively suppresses cell motility dependent on activated
3ß1 integrin. The TF cytoplasmic domain may enhance efficiency of metastasis by stabilizing the crucial spreading of tumor cells on patches of extracellular matrix exposed in target organs. In addition to metastasis, TF cytoplasmic signaling may influence other aspects of tumor cell biology, as discussed below after the following brief summary of our current view of the signaling crosstalk of TF with integrins.
| TF as a Regulator of Integrin Function |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Although we found that the TF extracellular domain interacts with several integrin heterodimers, there was no evidence that this resulted in competition or inhibition of extracellular matrix interaction by these adhesive receptors. Rather, TF specifically suppressed cell migration on certain extracellular matrices. In keratinocytes and melanoma cells, TF inhibited the migration on laminin-5 that is dependent on activation of integrin
3ß1. This inhibition required the TF cytoplasmic domain, and mutagenesis showed that integrin function is suppressed when the TF cytoplasmic domain was not phosphorylated. The suppression of migration on laminin-5 can be reversed by blocking the presumed integrin binding site on TF with antibody 5G9. Antibody binding appears to trigger cell signaling that leads to phosphorylation of the TF cytoplasmic domain and subsequent release of integrin inhibition. TF phosphorylation is specifically induced by PAR2 signaling,26 and protease-driven TF-VIIa activation of PAR2 is sufficient to release integrin inhibition in dependence of phosphorylation of the TF cytoplasmic domain.21 Thus, TF-VIIa signaling may simultaneously counteract integrin suppression by phosphorylating the TF cytoplasmic domain and trigger promigratory PAR2 activation.27
Recently, active siteblocked proteolytically-inactive VIIa was shown to elicit Rac and p38 MAP kinase activation in a pathway that required the TF cytoplasmic domain.28 Considering the use of supraphysiological, extremely high concentrations of VIIa in this study, we suspect that these experiments measured competition with as yet to be defined extracellular interactions of TF. It should be noted that active siteblocked VIIa did not release the suppression of laminin-5 migration in keratinocytes, indicating that VIIa does not compete with relevant interactions that regulate promigratory functions of integrin
3ß1. Thus, one can envision that TF binds simultaneously VIIa as well as integrin through the substrate binding site. In this constellation, TF-VIIa complex signaling may regulate integrin function. It is notable that the TF-VIIa complex is indeed localized at the leading edge of invasive cancer, whereas more central areas of bladder carcinoma only stained for TF.11 Whether specific integrins are colocalized with TF expressed in cancer cells in vivo is currently unknown
There is good experimental evidence that TF-VIIa signaling stimulates cell motility. In fibroblasts, TF-VIIa signaling enhances platelet derived growth factor BB (PDGF-BB)stimulated migration, suggesting signaling crosstalk between G-coupled receptors (PARs) and tyrosine kinase receptors in migration.29 Similarly, signaling of the TF-VIIa-Xa complex is promigratory in a breast carcinoma cell line.30 TF-VIIa signaling is promigratory and proinvasive dependent on PAR2 in breast carcinoma. Cleavage blocking antibodies clearly showed that PAR2 activation, rather than a bystander effect, is responsible for the promigratory effects of TF-VIIa signaling. Notably, this promigratory effect appears to be indirect and mediated by the release of interleukin (IL) 8.31 In this context, it is notable that IL 8 expression was also induced by TF-VIIa signaling in keratinocytes, indicating that migration of noncancerous epithelia may similarly be regulated by TF-VIIa signaling.32 Thus, TF-dependent PAR signaling may stimulate both pathological migration (tumor cell invasion) and physiological re-epithelialization (keratinocyte mediated wound healing).
This raises the question whether tumor cells have lost regulatory mechanisms that typically control these pathways under physiological conditions. One possibility is that dephosphorylation of the TF cytoplasmic domain normally acts as a break to suppress integrin-dependent migration, and that deregulated TF phosphorylation contributes to the aggressive behavior of invasive tumor cells. In addition, aggressive cancer cells upregulate PAR1, which can stimulate invasiveness of tumor cells.14 PAR1 has recently been shown to be cleaved by matrix metalloproteinases derived from tumor-associated stromal cells,33 raising the intriguing possibility that PAR1 and PAR2 provide redundant pathways to exploit promigratory cues form a dynamically changing tumor microenvironment.
| Role of TF-Mediated Signaling in the Regulation of the Tumor Microenvironment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Indeed, TF expression by tumor cells may trigger several pathways that shape the tumor microenvironment. Coagulation activation produces proteolytic fragments of proteases, inhibitors, and extracellular matrix components with potent regulatory effects on angiogenesis.39 The most frequently discussed mechanism by which TF regulates angiogenesis is through altered expression of angiogenic factors, foremost an upregulation of VEGF and a downregulation of thrombospondin.36,40,41 In vivo, TF may drive local thrombin generation and thus indirectly induce VEGF signaling either by paracrine PAR1 signaling in stromal cells or by PAR1 activation of tumor cell in an autocrine manner. Whether VEGF induction is of importance in the context of hypoxia-driven tumor angiogenesis remains uncertain, but thrombin regulates other aspects of signaling in endothelial cells; eg, thrombin upregulates VEGF receptor through PAR1 signaling42 and induces endocytosis of endoglin and transforming growth factor (TGF) ß-receptor II.43
Expression of antiangiogenic thrombospondins is suppressed in TF-positive tumor cells, and this may act in concert to enhance the action of proangiogenic growth factors. Whether thrombospondins are regulated directly by TF overexpression in tumor cells is controversial.36,40 Considering the complex signaling crosstalk of TF with integrins, gene expression may be influenced by adhesion to specific extracellular matrices. In this context, the TF cytoplasmic domain may act as a positive regulator of tumor growth under certain conditions,41 although the details of these signaling events are incompletely understood. In addition, direct effects of TF on tumor cell proliferation, apoptosis, and local invasion may be highly dependent on a unique extracellular environment provided by stromal cells. Thus, indirect effects of TF through protease signaling targeting host cells may reciprocally influence direct effects of TF on the tumor cells specifically in the context of the tumor microenvironment.
| Coagulation and Angiogenesis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
13 to which PAR1 couples.46 In normal endothelium of the adult, TF is absent or only present at minute amounts, whereas subendothelial vessel wall cells, ie, fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells, constitutively express TF. Thus, there is no firm proof that TF expression in endothelial cells regulates vascular maintenance in normal physiological condition. In contrast, TF upregulation has been found in the endothelium during pathological conditions of inflammation and tumor progression.47 In animal models, inhibitors of TF-VIIa suppress tumor growth and in vivo angiogenesis, whereas potent anticoagulants that inhibit Xa display no such activity.48 Thrombin can also stimulate angiogenesis, but so far there is no clear genetic evidence that thrombin signaling though PAR1 in endothelial cells drives pathological angiogenesis.
Inhibition of tumor growth by TF-specific inhibitors raised the possibility that TF signaling may drive tumor angiogenesis. We approached this question by characterizing angiogenesis in knock-in mice that lack the TF cytoplasmic domain (TF
CT mice). Tumor angiogenesis was evaluated by transplanting syngeneic tumor to monitor subcutaneous tumor growth. Surprisingly, tumors grew
2-fold faster in these mice relative to wild-type controls, suggesting that the TF cytoplasmic domain in host cells plays a negative regulatory role in tumor angiogenesis.3 TF
CT mice formed greater tumors as compared with wild-type animals although injected tumor cells expressed high levels of TF, indicating that host cell TF regulated tumor expansion independent of local thrombin formation by tumor cells.
The conclusion of enhanced angiogenesis in these mice was further substantiated ex vivo by demonstrating that aortic ring endothelial cell sprouting was enhanced in TF
CT as compared with wild-type animals. Enhanced sprouting in this assay was found to be dependent on serum components, and specific protease inhibitors showed that VIIa is a critical serum factor necessary for the specific enhancement of sprouting from TF
CT aortas. Furthermore, purified VIIa enhanced angiogenesis, however only when PDGF BB was present. There was no synergy with other major proangiogenic growth factors, including VEGF-A, basic fibroblast growth factor, or PDGF-AA. Further studies with PAR2/TF
CT double knock-out mice provided genetic evidence that the TF-VIIa signaling phenotype of TF
CT aortas was dependent on PAR2. Importantly, PAR2 deletion per se did not affect angiogenesis, and angiogenesis in the PAR2/TF
CT double knock-out was similar to that in wild-type mice. One possible explanation for this finding is that the TF cytoplasmic domain exerts a potent negative regulatory control on PAR2 to prevent PAR2-dependent proangiogenic signaling. Consistent with such a signaling crosstalk between PAR2 and the TF cytoplasmic domain, we found that suppression of sprouting by overexpression of TF could only be achieved in wild-type but not in PAR2-deficient aortas.
Developmental angiogenesis in the retina was also enhanced in TF
CT mice and this phenotype was lost in PAR2/TF
CT double knock-out mice, demonstrating that TF cytoplasmic domain signaling and PAR2 are linked in vivo. The organization of the retina vasculature, recruitment of pericytes, and physiological remodeling all appeared normal, suggesting that endothelial sprouting is accelerated on loss of TF cytoplasmic domain. These data are in line with data demonstrating promigratory effects of TF-VIIa and PAR2 signaling27,29 and antimigratory TF cytoplasmic domain signaling.21
A key question arising from these findings is how TF cytoplasmic domain inhibitory activity is regulated in physiological and pathological angiogenesis. In endothelial cells, the TF cytoplasmic domain is unphosphorylated by default, but activation of PKC-
triggers phosphorylation. PAR2 but not PAR1 signaling leads to prolonged PKC-
activation and downstream TF cytoplasmic domain phosphorylation. Activation of phosphatidylcholine-specific phospholipase C upstream of PKC-
accounts for this unique signaling response of PAR2 signaling.26 However, thio-ester modification of the cytoplasmic cysteine counteracts TF phosphorylation.49 Thus, PAR2 expression and changes in palmitoylation status of TF emerge as key regulators of TF cytoplasmic domain phosphorylation.
We evaluated the role of TF phosphorylation in pathological neovascularization of the eye. Phosphorylated TF was associated with abnormal proliferative neovasculature in retinas of diabetic patients, whereas TF in normal vessel wall and neuronal tissue was not phosphorylated. PAR2 was clearly detectable in pathological vessels, suggesting a concept that TF phosphorylation in the context of PAR2 signaling may switch off the suppressive function of the TF cytoplasmic domain and facilitate PAR2-dependent pathological angiogenesis. Conceivably, TF may support physiological angiogenesis as well, but dephosphorylation of the TF cytoplasmic domain may serve as a break to arrest excessive neovascularization. Indeed, the TF cytoplasmic domain in its unphosphorylated state regulates integrin
3ß1, which is also the target for antiangiogenic effects of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-2.50
| Conclusions and Future Directions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
is required for TF cytoplasmic domain phosphorylation at Ser253 and subsequent phosphorylation of Ser258, the Prodirected kinase that targets the latter residue remains to be defined. In addition, pathways that influence the palmitoylation of TF represent additional directions of research. It will be important to establish whether phosphorylated TF is a general marker of activated endothelium in pathological angiogenesis and whether tumor cell TF is phosphorylated, in particular in invasive areas of carcinoma. Considering that tumor cells are known to shed TF into the circulation, it will be of interest whether circulating phosphorylated TF may serve as a diagnostic and/or prognostic marker of tumor progression or pathological angiogenesis in diabetes and cancer. | Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received March 15, 2005; accepted May 9, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3ß1 and tissue factor in cell migration. Mol Biol Cell. 2004; 15: 44164425.
13 deficiency. Science. 1997; 275: 533536.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. N. Brown and J. D. Herrington Review of the Relationship Between Venous Thromboembolism, Malignancy and Its Treatment Journal of Pharmacy Practice, April 1, 2008; 21(2): 126 - 137. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. McDonald, K. Yang, H. R. Roberts, D. M. Monroe, and M. Hoffman Perivascular tissue factor is down-regulated following cutaneous wounding: implications for bleeding in hemophilia Blood, February 15, 2008; 111(4): 2046 - 2048. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. R. Pendurthi, S. Ghosh, S. K. Mandal, and L. V. M. Rao Tissue factor activation: is disulfide bond switching a regulatory mechanism? Blood, December 1, 2007; 110(12): 3900 - 3908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Lwaleed, A. J. Cooper, D. Voegeli, and K. Getliffe Tissue Factor: A Critical Role in Inflammation and Cancer Biol Res Nurs, October 1, 2007; 9(2): 97 - 107. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. H. Versteeg and W. Ruf Tissue Factor Coagulant Function Is Enhanced by Protein-disulfide Isomerase Independent of Oxidoreductase Activity J. Biol. Chem., August 31, 2007; 282(35): 25416 - 25424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Mandal, U. R. Pendurthi, and L. V. M. Rao Tissue factor trafficking in fibroblasts: involvement of protease-activated receptor-mediated cell signaling Blood, July 1, 2007; 110(1): 161 - 170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Uusitalo-Jarvinen, T. Kurokawa, B. M. Mueller, P. Andrade-Gordon, M. Friedlander, and W. Ruf Role of Protease Activated Receptor 1 and 2 Signaling in Hypoxia-Induced Angiogenesis Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., June 1, 2007; 27(6): 1456 - 1462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Awasthi, S. K. Mandal, V. Papanna, L. V. M. Rao, and U. R. Pendurthi Modulation of Tissue Factor-Factor VIIa Signaling by Lipid Rafts and Caveolae Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., June 1, 2007; 27(6): 1447 - 1455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Khorana, S. A. Ahrendt, C. K. Ryan, C. W. Francis, R. H. Hruban, Y. C. Hu, G. Hostetter, J. Harvey, and M. B. Taubman Tissue Factor Expression, Angiogenesis, and Thrombosis in Pancreatic Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2007; 13(10): 2870 - 2875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Arora, T. K. Ricks, and J. Trejo Protease-activated receptor signalling, endocytic sorting and dysregulation in cancer J. Cell Sci., March 15, 2007; 120(6): 921 - 928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Rak, J. L. Yu, J. Luyendyk, and N. Mackman Oncogenes, Trousseau Syndrome, and Cancer-Related Changes in the Coagulome of Mice and Humans. Cancer Res., November 15, 2006; 66(22): 10643 - 10646. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Schmidt, L. M. Asmis, B. Odermatt, J. Kelm, C. Breymann, M. Gossi, M. Genoni, G. Zund, and S. P. Hoerstrup Engineered living blood vessels: functional endothelia generated from human umbilical cord-derived progenitors. Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2006; 82(4): 1465 - 1471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Koizume, M.-S. Jin, E. Miyagi, F. Hirahara, Y. Nakamura, J.-H. Piao, A. Asai, A. Yoshida, E. Tsuchiya, W. Ruf, et al. Activation of Cancer Cell Migration and Invasion by Ectopic Synthesis of Coagulation Factor VII Cancer Res., October 1, 2006; 66(19): 9453 - 9460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Ahamed, H. H. Versteeg, M. Kerver, V. M. Chen, B. M. Mueller, P. J. Hogg, and W. Ruf Disulfide isomerization switches tissue factor from coagulation to cell signaling PNAS, September 19, 2006; 103(38): 13932 - 13937. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Mandal, U. R. Pendurthi, and L. V. M. Rao Cellular localization and trafficking of tissue factor Blood, June 15, 2006; 107(12): 4746 - 4753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |