This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 25/2/296    most recent 01.ATV.0000151690.43777.e4v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Powell, T. M. Articles by Cannon, R. O. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Powell, T. M. Articles by Cannon, R. O., III Related Collections Chronic ischemic heart disease Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide Other Treatment Related Article

(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2005;25:296.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.

Vascular Biology

Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Mobilizes Functional Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Tiffany M. Powell; Jonathan D. Paul; Jonathan M. Hill; Michael Thompson; Moshe Benjamin; Maria Rodrigo; J. Philip McCoy; Elizabeth J. Read; Hanh M. Khuu; Susan F. Leitman; Toren Finkel; Richard O. Cannon, III

From the Cardiovascular Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the Department of Transfusion Medicine, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.

Correspondence to Richard O. Cannon III, MD, National Institutes of Health, Building 10 Room 7B15, 10 Center Drive MSC 1650, Bethesda, MD 20892-1650. E-mail cannonr{at}nih.gov

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Objective— Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) that may repair vascular injury are reduced in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). We reasoned that EPC number and function may be increased by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) used to mobilize hematopoietic progenitor cells in healthy donors.

Methods and Results— Sixteen CAD patients had reduced CD34⁺/CD133⁺ (0.0224±0.0063% versus 0.121±0.038% mononuclear cells [MNCs], P<0.01) and CD133⁺/VEGFR-2⁺ cells, consistent with EPC phenotype (0.00033±0.00015% versus 0.0017±0.0006% MNCs, P<0.01), compared with 7 healthy controls. Patients also had fewer clusters of cells in culture, with out-growth consistent with mature endothelial phenotype (2±1/well) compared with 16 healthy subjects at high risk (13±4/well, P<0.05) or 14 at low risk (22±3/well, P<0.001) for CAD. G-CSF 10 µg/kg per day for 5 days increased CD34⁺/CD133⁺ cells from 0.5±0.2/µL to 59.5±10.6/µL and CD133⁺/ VEGFR-2⁺ cells from 0.007±0.004/µL to 1.9±0.6/µL (both P<0.001). Also increased were CD133⁺ cells that coexpressed the homing receptor CXCR4 (30.4±8.3/µL, P<0.05). Endothelial cell-forming clusters in 10 patients increased to 27±9/well after treatment (P<0.05), with a decline to 9±4/well at 2 weeks (P=0.06).

Conclusions— Despite reduced EPCs compared with healthy controls, patients with CAD respond to G-CSF with increases in EPC number and homing receptor expression in the circulation and endothelial out-growth in culture.

Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are reduced in coronary artery disease. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (CSF) administered to patients increased: (1) CD133⁺/VEGFR-2⁺ cells consistent with EPC phenotype; (2) CD133⁺ cells coexpressing the chemokine receptor CXCR4, important for homing of EPCs to ischemic tissue; and (3) endothelial cell-forming clusters in culture. Whether EPCs mobilized into the circulation will be useful for the purpose of initiating vascular growth and myocyte repair in coronary artery disease patients must be tested in clinical trials.

Key Words: coronary disease • atherosclerosis • angiogenesis • cell adhesion molecules • cells

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Progenitor cells circulate in the bloodstream, with the potential for cardiovascular repair after injury. In animal models of hind limb, myocardial, or cerebral ischemia, vascular progenitor cells have been shown to incorporate into areas of active vascular growth,^1,2 suggesting that they may have therapeutic potential either by providing endothelial cells for new vessel growth or through secretion of angiogenic growth factors that activate neighboring cells. A lineage of particular interest derives from a subset of CD34⁺ hematopoietic stem cells that expresses one of the receptors for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGFR-2), with the cell surface marker CD133 further defining early forms of this lineage.^3–7 This population of cells has been referred to as endothelial progenitor or precursor cells (EPCs) because under specific culture conditions, CD34⁺ and CD133⁺ cells differentiate into a mature endothelial phenotype based on microscopic appearance, functional characteristics (uptake of acetylated low-density lipoprotein [LDL], nitric oxide synthesis), and expression of cell surface markers (E-selectin, von Willebrand factor, vascular endothelial cadherin, platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule, _Vß_III integrin, c-kit) associated with loss of CD133 expression.

See page 270

In clinical studies, designation of EPCs has not been consistent, with differences among groups in flow cytometric analysis or cell culture techniques used for processing mononuclear cells (MNCs) from patient samples. Two groups have demonstrated differences in what they defined as EPCs between patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) or its risk factors and healthy subjects. Vasa et al⁸ reported that EPCs—defined as dual staining of MNCs, plated on fibronectin-coated dishes for 4 days, for 1,1'-dioctadecyl-3,3,3',3'-tetramethylindocarbocyanine–labeled acetylated LDL (DiI-LDL) and Ulex europaeus agglutinin-1 (lectin) using fluorescent microscopy—are significantly reduced in patients with CAD. The number of CAD risk factors was inversely correlated with number of circulating CD34⁺/VEGFR-2⁺ MNCs measured by flow cytometry, with smoking being a significant independent risk factor for lower EPC levels. This group also examined the migratory activity of EPCs from their culture assay in response to VEGF, and determined that this property was significantly diminished in CAD patients compared with healthy controls and inversely related to the number of CAD risk factors. Hill et al⁹ extended these findings to healthy subjects with risk factors for CAD, using an assay of endothelial outgrowth from MNCs initially nonadherent to fibronectin after 48 hours in culture dishes and replated in fibronectin-coated wells with growth media. This step was performed to remove circulating mature endothelial cells that may be of vascular rather than bone marrow progenitor cell origin.^4–7,10,11 After 7 days in culture, clusters of rounded cells emanating thin, flat cells at their periphery were designated as EPC colony-forming units. Numbers of these colony-forming units correlated inversely with the number of CAD risk factors and linearly with endothelial function assessed in the brachial artery after increased shear-stress with postischemic hyperemia, consistent with the notion that diminished EPC release or survival in the circulation may contribute to endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular risk.

EPCs of hematopoietic lineage, defined by CD34⁺/CD133⁺/VEGFR-2⁺ cell surface markers, circulate in small numbers, even in healthy individuals (0.002% of total MNCs),⁶ and thus further reduction in number or differentiation potential may compromise endothelial repair or limit cardiac adaptive responses to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, including CAD. Accordingly, stimulation of EPC release into the circulation may be an effective strategy for vascular repair in patients with advanced CAD in whom more conventional treatment has failed, an approach supported by experimental studies.^2,12 However, this may occur only if there are sufficient numbers of cells mobilized from bone marrow with expression of receptors that might promote homing to ischemic myocardium. In this regard, it is possible that CAD patients, who have associated medical conditions and require multiple medications for management, have low numbers of EPCs in the circulation because of impaired production within bone marrow or reduced survival. We hypothesized that EPC release into the circulation may be increased in CAD patients by administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), which is known to mobilize hematopoietic progenitor cells into the peripheral blood in healthy subjects,¹³ and that these cells might have potential for differentiation into endothelial cells. We used flow cytometry to study the effects of G-CSF administration on mobilization of cells of hematopoietic stem cell (CD34⁺) lineage with expression of EPC markers (CD133, VEGFR-2) and cells expressing the chemokine receptor CXCR4, which may promote homing of EPCs to ischemic tissue. We additionally determined the endothelial differentiation capacity of MNCs using an ex vivo colony-forming assay.

	Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Study Populations
All patients had extensive CAD by recent (within 6 months) coronary arteriography and were Canadian Cardiovascular Society class 3 (chest pain with routine activity) or 4 (chest pain on minimal exertion or at rest), despite previous attempts at surgical or percutaneous coronary revascularization. All patients were either unsuitable for further revascularization procedures or declined further attempts, and had evidence of inducible myocardial ischemia by dobutamine stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, with resting left ventricular ejection fractions >30%. No patient had evidence of systemic disease, except for adult-onset diabetes mellitus without retinopathy or renal disease. Medical therapy for all patients included ß-blockers, aspirin, and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl–coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (statin) therapy; these medications were maintained through the study. Sixteen patients (11 men and 5 women; age range, 42 to 71 years) fulfilled eligibility criteria and received G-CSF (filgrastim; Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif) 10 µg/kg per day subcutaneously for 5 days after baseline testing. Three blood samples were drawn from each patient: baseline (before the first dose of G-CSF), 6 to 24 hours after the last dose of G-CSF (day 6), and 2 weeks after the first dose of G-CSF (day 14). This protocol was approved by the Scientific Review Committee and the Institutional Review Board of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and informed written consent was obtained from all patients. Seven healthy subjects (4 men and 3 women; age range, 19 to 50 years) who had no risk factors for cardiovascular disease received the identical treatment with G-CSF as participants in other protocol and served as controls for flow cytometric measurements. Thirty healthy men served as controls for cell culture measurements: 16 (age 58.9±2.4 years) were considered at high risk for CAD based on Framingham Risk Scores ranging from +6 to +15 (+7.8±0.6) and 14 (age 40.1±2.7 years) were considered at low risk based on scores ranging from –4 to –2 (–0.2±0.4).⁹

Flow Cytometry Analysis
Flow cytometry was performed on buffy coat cells isolated from EDTA-anticoagulated peripheral blood to quantitate expression of cell surface markers on MNCs. Blood samples were diluted with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and peripheral blood MNCs were isolated by density gradient centrifugation using Ficoll-Paque PLUS (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech AB, Uppsala, Sweden). Recovered cells were washed twice with PBS and resuspended in 2 mL PBS. The number of MNCs was determined using a Coulter Counter (Beckman Coulter, Inc, Fullerton, Calif). One million to 2 million MNCs were aliquoted into 5 mL polystyrene tubes (Falcon; Beckton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and incubated with 50 µL mouse serum (-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo) at room temperature to block nonspecific binding of antibodies. Each tube of aliquoted cells was stained with PE or fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated CD34 monoclonal antibody (BD Biosciences, San Jose, Calif) and PerCPCy5.5-conjugated CD45 monoclonal antibody (BD Biosciences). Up to 2 additional monoclonal antibodies for EPC and endothelial cell markers were also added to each tube of cells from the following antibodies: biotin-conjugated VEGFR-2 (Sigma-Aldrich), PE-conjugated CD133 or activated protein C (APC)-conjugated CD133 (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, Calif), and PE-conjugated CXCR4 (BD Pharmingen). One million to 2 million cells were incubated with appropriate volumes of the antibodies at room temperature and protected from light for 25 minutes with the combinations of 4 antibodies. Combinations of isotype controls were used as negative controls based on the species and IgG subclass of each antibody (Figure 1). For samples stained with biotin–VEGFR-2 or its biotin control, samples were incubated an additional 45 minutes with 10 µL streptavidin–APC diluted in a 100 µL solution with PBS. After incubation with the antibodies, cells were washed with 2 mL PBS and centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 5 minutes. Stained cells were resuspended in 0.3 µL PBS and 0.3 µL 1% paraformaldehyde solution. The FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and CellQuest Software (version 3.3; San Jose, Calif) were used for data acquisition. Data were gated on the mononuclear population during data acquisition and 250 000 events were collected in the gated region for each sample of cells. Summit software (version 3.1; Dako Cytomation, Ft Collins, Col) was used for data analysis. The percent of each of the following subpopulations was expressed as a percent of the total MNCs: CD34/CD133, CD133/VEGFR-2, CD34/CD144, CD34/CD51–61, CD34/CD31, and CD133/CXCR4. Cell populations in patients were also expressed as the number of circulating cells per volume of peripheral blood, based on the nucleated white blood cell count from the automated counter.

View larger version (46K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Upper left, Forward versus side-scatter of a specimen, after G-CSF, stained with isotype controls. Upper right, Same specimen as previous panel, illustrating the staining with APC and PE isotype controls. Lower left, Forward versus side-scatter of the same specimen stained with PE-CD133 and KDR-APC. Lower right, Same specimen as previous panel, illustrating the staining with KDR-APC (VEGFR-2) and PE-CD133. EPCs are present in the upper right quadrant of this panel.

EPC Isolation and Colony-Forming Assay
Twenty-four mL venous blood was collected at each time point into BD Vacutainer CPT Mononuclear Cell Preparation Tubes (Becton Dickinson). MNCs recovered by density-gradient centrifugation in these tubes were washed twice with PBS and once in EPC growth media consisting of medium199 (GIBCO BRL Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum, penicillin (100 U/mL), and streptomycin (100 µg/mL). Cells were resuspended in media, plated at a density of 5x10⁶ per well on dishes coated with human fibronectin (BIOCOAT; Becton Dickinson Labware, Bedford, Mass), and incubated at 37°C in humidified 5% CO_2. After 48 hours, nonadherent cells suspended in the growth media were replated onto fibronectin-coated 24-well plates at a density of 10⁶ per well. Media was changed every 3 days, and EPC colony-forming units, defined as a central core of rounded cells surrounded by elongating and spindle-shaped cells, were counted after 7 days in culture (Figure 2A). Cell clusters alone without emerging spindle cells were not counted as positive (Figure 2B). Colonies were counted in a minimum of 4 wells of a 24-well plate and averaged. In selected samples, confirmation of endothelial phenotype was performed using endothelial-specific indicators such as uptake of DiI-LDL, staining for UEA-1 lectin, CD31, VE-cadherin, von Willebrand factor, and VEGFR-2, as previously reported.^9,10

View larger version (78K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Assay for endothelial cell formation by progenitor cells. Peripheral blood MNCs were initially suspended in media and plated on fibronectin-coated wells (5x106 cells per well). After 48 hours, nonadherent cells were replated onto fibronectin-coated wells, and colonies were counted after 7 days. An endothelial progenitor cell colony-forming unit (EPC-CFU) consisted of a central core of rounded cells surrounded by elongated and spindle-shaped cells (A), with confirmation of endothelial phenotype by DiILDL uptake and staining for UEA-1 lectin, CD31, VEGFR-2, and von Willebrand factor in selected samples. Clusters of cells without emerging spindle cells (B) were not counted as an EPC-CFU.

Statistical Analysis
Comparisons of responses to G-CSF from baseline measurements were made by Student t test for paired data. Comparisons between patient and control groups were made by Student t test for unpaired data. Data are reported as mean±SEM.

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Flow Cytometry Analysis of Progenitor Cells
Before G-CSF administration to CAD patients, CD34⁺/CD133⁺ cells in blood averaged 0.0224±0.0063% of total MNC (0.53±0.17 cells/µL), which was significantly less than values in healthy subjects (Table). CD133⁺/VEGFR-2⁺ cells averaged 0.00033±0.00015% of total MNCs (0.007±0.004 cells/µL) in patients, which was also significantly lower than values in healthy subjects.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Expression of Hematopoietic Progenitor (CD34+/CD133+), Endothelial Progenitor (CD133+/VEGFR-2+), and Chemokine Receptor (CD133+/CXCR4+) Cell Surface Markers Measured by Flow Cytometry in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells From 16 Coronary Artery Disease Patients and From 7 Healthy Controls Before and After Administration of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor

After G-CSF administration for 5 days, CD34⁺/CD133⁺ cells in blood increased to 1.004±0.144% of total MNCs (59.5±10.6 cells/µL), returning to baseline by day 14 (Figure 3A). By comparison, in healthy subjects receiving the same regimen of G-CSF, CD34⁺/CD133⁺ cells averaged 2.647±0.421% of total MNCs, significantly higher than the response measured in patients (Table). CD133⁺/VEGFR-2⁺ cells increased in patients to 0.035±0.0107% of total MNCs (1.9±0.6 cells/µL), similar to the response measured in healthy subjects, and returned to baseline at day 14 (Figure 3B).

View larger version (11K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. G-CSF increases circulating hematopoietic progenitor cells identified by CD34+/CD133+ surface markers (A), endothelial progenitor cells identified by CD133+/VEGFR-2+ surface markers (B), and CD133+ coexpressing the chemokine receptor CXCR4 (C) within 24 hours of the fifth dose of G-CSF (10 µg/kg per day), with return to baseline by day 14. Data are normalized to patients’ absolute mononuclear cell counts at each time point and expressed as mean±SEM.

Chemokine Receptor Expression
CD133⁺ cells coexpressing CXCR4, the chemokine receptor for SDF-1, were lower at baseline in patients versus controls (Table) and increased in both groups after G-CSF, albeit to higher levels in controls compared with patients. CD133⁺/CXCR4⁺ cells returned toward baseline values by day 14 (Figure 3C). Levels of SDF-1, the ligand for CXCR4, measured in plasma by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minn), declined from 1715±105 pg/mL before treatment to 1357±101 pg/mL at day 6 (P<0.01).

Differentiation of Mononuclear Cells Into Endothelial Cells
The effect of G-CSF on differentiation of MNCs into endothelial cells was assessed by flow cytometry and by cell culture assay. CD34⁺ cells coexpressing markers of endothelial phenotype were measured in blood before and after G-CSF administration: CD31⁺ (platelet–endothelial cell adhesion molecule [PECAM]) cells increased in blood from 54±28 to183±66/µL after G-CSF (P<0.05 versus baseline) and remained elevated (224±60/µL) at day 14 (P<0.05 versus baseline); CD144⁺ (vascular endothelial cadherin [VE-cadherin]) cells increased from 16±16 to 107±90/µL after G-CSF (P<0.05 versus baseline), and remained significantly above baseline at day 14 (67±25/µL; P<0.05 versus baseline); and CD51/61⁺ (_Vß_III integrin) cells increased from 14±14 to 81±64/µL after G-CSF (P<0.05 versus baseline), and tended to remain above baseline at day 14 (49±24/µL blood), although this difference did not achieve statistical significance.

To determine whether G-CSF changed the capacity of MNCs to differentiate into endothelial cells in culture conditions, MNCs from 10 CAD patients were plated on fibronectin with EPC growth media for 1 week after replating of nonadherent cells at 48 hours of initial culture and assayed for clusters of rounded cells with out-growth of mature endothelial cells (confirmed by fluorescent DiI-acetylated LDL and lectin staining; Figure 2). Patients with CAD had lower EPC colony-forming units at baseline in comparison with 30 healthy subjects, regardless of whether their Framingham Risk Score was low or high (Figure 4).

View larger version (8K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4. Baseline EPC colony-forming units (CFU) per well (average of at least 4 wells) at 7 days of mononuclear cell culture in fibronectin-coated dishes after the pre-plating process described for Figure 2 are higher in healthy volunteers, whether at high risk (n=16) or low risk (n=14) for cardiovascular disease based on their Framingham global risk scores, compared with CAD patients (*P<0.001, CAD patients vs patients at low risk; **P<0.05, CAD patients vs patients at high risk).

After G-CSF, colonies with out-growth of endothelial cells increased to 10-fold over baseline measurements, with persistent increase at day 14 (Figure 5). There was no correlation between numbers of CD133⁺/VEGFR-2⁺ cells measured by flow cytometry and EPC colony-forming units in culture, at baseline or after G-CSF administration.

View larger version (6K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 5. G-CSF administered to CAD patients (n=10 for this assay) for 5 days increases EPC colony-forming units (CFU). *P<0.05, day 6 versus day 0; P=0.06, day 14 vs day 0).

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Progenitor cells in the circulation, including EPCs of hematopoietic lineage, may serve to repair vascular injury and maintain functional endothelium, as suggested by recent demonstrations of an inverse correlation between EPCs—whether measured in the circulation by flow cytometry or in culture by endothelial cell-forming ability—and risk factors in patients with CAD or apparently healthy subjects.^8,9 Reduced nitric oxide-dependent flow-mediated dilation of brachial arteries of healthy subjects with risk factors for CAD suggests that impaired release of EPCs from bone marrow or survival in the circulation may promote endothelial dysfunction, pathophysiologically linked to atherosclerosis, and risk of future cardiovascular events.^14–16 We now demonstrate that CAD patients have reduced circulating EPCs of hematopoietic lineage, as defined by CD34⁺/CD133⁺ and CD133⁺/VEGFR-2⁺ expression, compared with healthy subjects. Further, CAD patients have reduced endothelial differentiation capacity of MNCs in culture compared with healthy subjects, including those with risk factors for CAD. Although our culture technique—with replating of nonadherent cells after 48 hours in culture and determination of EPC colony-forming units—differs from that of Vasa et al,⁸ our pretreatment findings are similar. This was true of CAD patients in our study, despite universal use of statin therapy, previously shown to increase EPCs in the circulation of CAD patients after 1 month of treatment.¹⁷ There was no correlation between numbers of EPCs by flow cytometry and endothelial cell-forming colonies in our study, which may indicate that MNCs with endothelial cell differentiation capacity derive from lineages additional to hematopoietic stem cells, consistent with recent reports regarding CD14⁺ monocytes in culture.^18,19

We considered whether cytokine stimulation of progenitor cell release into the circulation might be possible in CAD patients, even though reduced numbers of EPCs could indicate irreversible depletion or enhanced apoptosis within bone marrow. Although basal levels of EPCs defined by CD133⁺/VEGFR-2⁺ cell surface markers were reduced in patients compared with healthy subjects, consistent with the findings of Vasa et al,⁸ we found that G-CSF administration increased EPCs of hematopoietic lineage in the circulation; however, the absolute number of cells in blood was small, 2 cells/µL or 10 million cells in the circulation. G-CSF also increased the capacity of MNCs to form colonies capable of endothelial cell maturation and proliferation. We cannot be certain that the endothelial colony-forming units in our culture assay are derived from CD34/CD133/VEGFR-2 population of cells within the circulation, despite the increase in circulating cells after G-CSF administration. However, the clusters of cells emanating cells of endothelial phenotype are similar to findings from assays that used CD34⁺ or CD133⁺-selected cells instead of unselected MNCs.^3,5

An additional observation made in our study may be important for the success of a cytokine mobilization strategy to initiate angiogenesis in ischemic myocardium. G-CSF not only increased the numbers of EPCs from baseline values but also activated cells in a manner of potential importance to cell homing,²⁰ with increased expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR4. Regarding the mechanism of CXCR4 expression after G-CSF, Kollet et al²¹ reported that CD34⁺ cells contain intracellular CXCR4 that can be induced to functional expression on the cell surface on stimulation with cytokines. Accordingly, the increase in CXCR4 expression in CD133⁺ cells as measured by flow cytometry in our study is consistent with increased binding of monoclonal antibody to CXCR4 translocated to the cell surface after G-CSF activation of the CD133⁺ subpopulation of hematopoietic stem cells. Increased cell surface expression of CXCR4 may enhance trafficking and homing of progenitor cells to sites of myocardial ischemia in response to its ligand, SDF-1.²² In support of the functional significance of CXCR4 receptor expression in our study, levels of SDF-1 in serum declined significantly after G-CSF administration, likely caused by receptor binding on circulating MNCs.

Our findings establish that G-CSF administration to patients with CAD mobilizes hematopoietic progenitor cells into the circulation, including the EPC subset of cells expressing mature endothelial markers and the chemokine receptor CXCR4, and augments EPC colony-forming capacity. This cytokine approach to EPC mobilization was tested in a clinical trial of percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting after myocardial infarction.²³ This group reported an increased incidence of in-stent restenosis at the 6-month follow-up coronary angiogram, and the clinical trial was stopped. Whether EPCs mobilized into the circulation by G-CSF, with or without collection by leukapheresis and direct administration, will be useful for initiating vascular growth and myocyte repair in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease who have not undergone recent intravascular intervention must be tested in clinical trials.

	Footnotes

 
T.M.P. and J.D.P. were fellows in the Clinical Research Training Program, National Institutes of Health, and share primary authorship of this manuscript.

Received February 28, 2004; accepted November 15, 2004.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 

1. Asahara T, Masuda H, Takahashi T, Kalka C, Pastore C, Silver M, Kearne M, Magner M, Isner JM. Bone marrow origin of endothelial progenitor cells responsible for postnatal vasculogenesis in physiological and pathological neovascularization. Circ Res. 1999; 85: 221–228.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Takahashi T, Kalka C, Masuda H, Chen D, Silver M, Kearney M, Magner M, Isner JM, Asahara T. Ischemia- and cytokine-induced mobilization of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells for neovascularization. Nat Med. 1999; 5: 434–438.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A, Silver M, van der Zee R, Li T, Witzenbichler B, Schatterman G, Isner JM. Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science. 1997; 275: 964–967.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Shi Q, Rafii S, Wu MH-D, Wijelath ES, Yu C, Ishida A, Fujita A, Kothari S, Mohle R, Sauvage LR, Moore MAS, Storb RF, Hammond WH. Evidence for circulating bone marrow-derived endothelial cells. Blood. 1998; 92: 362–367.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Gehling UM, Ergun S, Schumacher U, Wagener C, Pantel K, Otte M, Schuch G, Schafhausen P, Mende T, Kilic N, Kluge K, Schafer B. In vitro differentiation of endothelial cells from AC133-positive progenitor cells. Blood. 2000; 95: 3106–3112.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Peichev M, Naiyer AJ, Pereira D, Zhu Z, Lane WJ, Williams M, Oz MC, Hicklin DJ, Witte L, Moore MA, Rafii S. Expression of VEGFR-2 and AC133 by circulating human CD34(+) cells identifies a population of functional endothelial precursors. Blood. 2000; 95: 952–958.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Yin AH, Miraglia S, Zanjani ED, Almeida-Porada G, Ogawa M, Leary AG, Olweus J, Kearney J, Buck DW. AC133, a novel marker for human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Blood. 1997; 90: 5002–5012.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Vasa M, Fichtlscherer S, Aicher A, Adler K, Urbich C, Martin H, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Number and migratory activity of circulating endothelial progenitor cells inversely correlate with risk factors for coronary artery disease. Circ Res. 2001; 89: E1–E7.
9. Hill JM, Zalos G, Halcox JP, Schenke WH, Waclawiw MA, Quyyumi AA, Finkel T. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells, vascular function, and cardiovascular risk. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348: 593–600.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Ito H, Rovira II, Bloom ML, Takeda K, Ferrans VJ, Quyyumi AA, Finkel T. Endothelial progenitor cells as putative targets for angiostatin. Cancer Res. 1999; 59: 5875–5877.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Lin Y, Weisdorf DJ, Solovey A, Hebbel RP. Origins of circulating endothelial cells and endothelial outgrowth from blood. J Clin Invest. 2000; 105: 71–77.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Orlic D, Kajstura J, Chimenti S, Limana F, Jakoniuk I, Quaini F, Nadal-Ginard B, Bodine DM, Leri A, Anversa P. Mobilized bone marrow cells repair the infarcted heart, improving function and survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98: 10344–10349.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Stroncek DF, Clay ME, Herr G, Smith J, Jaszcz WB, Ilstrup S, McCullough J. The kinetics of G-CSF mobilization of CD34+ cells in healthy people. Transfus Med. 1997; 7: 19–24.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Suwaidi JA, Hamasaki S, Higano ST, Nishimura RA, Holmes DR Jr., Lerman A. Long-term follow-up of patients with mild coronary artery disease and endothelial dysfunction. Circulation. 2000; 101: 948–954.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Schachinger V, Britten MB, Zeiher AM. Prognostic impact of coronary vasodilator dysfunction on adverse long-term outcome of coronary heart disease. Circulation. 2000; 101: 1899–1906.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Halcox JP, Schenke WH, Zalos G, Mincemoyer R, Prasad A, Waclawiw MA, Nour KR, Quyyumi AA. Prognostic value of coronary endothelial dysfunction. Circulation. 2002; 105: 1567–1572.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Vasa M, Fichtlscherer S, Adler, K, Aicher A, Martin H, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Increase in circulating endothelial progenitor cells by statin therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2001; 103: 2885–2890.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Rehman J, Li J, Orschell CM, March KL. Peripheral blood "endothelial progenitor cells" are derived from monocyte/macrophages and secrete angiogenic growth factors. Circulation. 2003; 107: 1164–1169.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Urbich C, Heeschen C, Aicher A, Dembach E, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Relevance of monocytic features for neovascularization capacity of circulating endothelial progenitor cells. Circulation. 2003; 108: 2511–2516.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Peled A, Petit I, Kollet O, Magid M, Ponomaryov T, Byk T, Nagler A, Ben-Hur H, Many A, Shultz L, Lider O, Alon R, Zipori D, Lapidot T. Dependence of human stem cell engraftment and repopulation of NOD/SCID mice on CXCR4. Science. 1999; 283: 845–848.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Kollet O, Petit I, Samira S, Dar A, Peled A, Deutsch V, Gunetti M, Piacibello W, Nagler A, Lapidot T. Human CD34⁺CXCR4^– sorted cells harbor intracellular CXCR4, which can be functionally expressed and provide NOD/SCID repopulation. Blood. 2003; 100: 2778–2786.
22. Yamaguchi J, Kusano KF, Masuo O, Kawamoto A, Silver M, Murasawa S, Bosch-Marce M, Masuda H, Losordo DW, Isner JM. Stromal cell-derived factor-1 effects on ex vivo expanded endothelial progenitor cell recruitment for ischemic neovascularization. Circulation. 2003; 107: 1322–1328.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Kang HJ, Kim HS, Zhang SY, Park KY, Cho HJ, Koo BK, Kim YJ, Soo Lee D, Sohn DW, Han KS, Oh BH, Lee MM, Park YB. Effects of intracoronary infusion of peripheral blood stem-cells mobilized with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor on left ventricular systolic function and restenosis after coronary stenting in myocardial infarction: the MAGIC cell randomized clinical trial. Lancet. 2004; 363: 751–756.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Related Article:

Are Circulating CD133⁺ Cells Biomarkers of Vascular Disease?

Gina Schatteman
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2005 25: 270-271. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Z. E. Toth, R. R. Leker, T. Shahar, S. Pastorino, I. Szalayova, B. Asemenew, S. Key, A. Parmelee, B. Mayer, K. Nemeth, et al. The combination of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and stem cell factor significantly increases the number of bone marrow-derived endothelial cells in brains of mice following cerebral ischemia Blood, June 15, 2008; 111(12): 5544 - 5552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. J. Povsic and P. J. Goldschmidt-Clermont Review: Endothelial progenitor cells: markers of vascular reparative capacity Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, June 1, 2008; 2(3): 199 - 213. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Thill, N. V. Strunnikova, M. J. Berna, N. Gordiyenko, K. Schmid, S. W. Cousins, D. J. S. Thompson, and K. G. Csaky Late Outgrowth Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2008; 49(6): 2696 - 2708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Smart and P. R. Riley The Stem Cell Movement Circ. Res., May 23, 2008; 102(10): 1155 - 1168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C Kalka and I. Baumgartner Gene and stem cell therapy in peripheral arterial occlusive disease Vascular Medicine, May 1, 2008; 13(2): 157 - 172. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H Ince, M Valgimigli, M Petzsch, J S. de Lezo, F Kuethe, S Dunkelmann, G Biondi-Zoccai, and C A Nienaber Cardiovascular events and re-stenosis following administration of G-CSF in acute myocardial infarction: systematic review and meta-analysis Heart, May 1, 2008; 94(5): 610 - 616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Takahashi, H. Nakamura, M. Seki, Y. Shiraishi, M. Yamamoto, M. Furuuchi, T. Nakajima, S. Tsujimura, T. Shirahata, M. Nakamura, et al. Reversal of elastase-induced pulmonary emphysema and promotion of alveolar epithelial cell proliferation by simvastatin in mice Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, May 1, 2008; 294(5): L882 - L890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Shao, Y. Tan, D. Eton, Z. Yang, M. G. Uberti, S. Li, A. Schulick, and H. Yu Statin and Stromal Cell-Derived Factor-1 Additively Promote Angiogenesis by Enhancement of Progenitor Cells Incorporation into New Vessels Stem Cells, May 1, 2008; 26(5): 1376 - 1384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Anderlini and R. E. Champlin Biologic and molecular effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in healthy individuals: recent findings and current challenges Blood, February 15, 2008; 111(4): 1767 - 1772. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Whittaker, J. S. Moore, M. Vasa-Nicotera, S. Stevens, and N. J. Samani Evidence for genetic regulation of endothelial progenitor cells and their role as biological markers of atherosclerotic susceptibility Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2008; 29(3): 332 - 338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. J. Povsic, K. L. Zavodni, F. L. Kelly, S. Zhu, P. J. Goldschmidt-Clermont, C. Dong, and E. D. Peterson Circulating Progenitor Cells Can Be Reliably Identified on the Basis of Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Activity J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 4, 2007; 50(23): 2243 - 2248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I.-Y. Oh, C.-H. Yoon, J. Hur, J.-H. Kim, T.-Y. Kim, C.-S. Lee, K.-W. Park, I.-H. Chae, B.-H. Oh, Y.-B. Park, et al. Involvement of E-selectin in recruitment of endothelial progenitor cells and angiogenesis in ischemic muscle Blood, December 1, 2007; 110(12): 3891 - 3899. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. L. Hoetzer, G. P. Van Guilder, H. M. Irmiger, R. S. Keith, B. L. Stauffer, and C. A. DeSouza Aging, exercise, and endothelial progenitor cell clonogenic and migratory capacity in men J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2007; 102(3): 847 - 852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Tan, H. Shao, D. Eton, Z. Yang, L. Alonso-Diaz, H. Zhang, A. Schulick, A. S. Livingstone, and H. Yu Stromal cell-derived factor-1 enhances pro-angiogenic effect of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor Cardiovasc Res, March 1, 2007; 73(4): 823 - 832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Roberts, Q. Xiao, G. Weir, Q. Xu, and M. Jahangiri Endothelial Progenitor Cells are Mobilized After Cardiac Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2007; 83(2): 598 - 605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Shepherd, B. J. Capoccia, S. M. Devine, J. DiPersio, K. M. Trinkaus, D. Ingram, and D. C. Link Angiogenic cells can be rapidly mobilized and efficiently harvested from the blood following treatment with AMD3100 Blood, December 1, 2006; 108(12): 3662 - 3667. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. G. Shaffer, S. Greene, A. Arshi, G. Supple, A. Bantly, J. S Moores, M. S Parmacek, and E. R Mohler III Effect of acute exercise on endothelial progenitor cells in patients with peripheral arterial disease Vascular Medicine, November 1, 2006; 11(4): 219 - 226. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Ben-Dor, S. Fuchs, and R. Kornowski Potential Hazards and Technical Considerations Associated With Myocardial Cell Transplantation Protocols for Ischemic Myocardial Syndrome J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 17, 2006; 48(8): 1519 - 1526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Honold, R. Lehmann, C. Heeschen, D. H. Walter, B. Assmus, K.-I. Sasaki, H. Martin, J. Haendeler, A. M. Zeiher, and S. Dimmeler Effects of Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor on Functional Activities of Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Patients With Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., October 1, 2006; 26(10): 2238 - 2243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. J. Capoccia, R. M. Shepherd, and D. C. Link G-CSF and AMD3100 mobilize monocytes into the blood that stimulate angiogenesis in vivo through a paracrine mechanism Blood, October 1, 2006; 108(7): 2438 - 2445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. P. Fadini, A. Coracina, I. Baesso, C. Agostini, A. Tiengo, A. Avogaro, and S. Vigili de Kreutzenberg Peripheral Blood CD34+KDR+ Endothelial Progenitor Cells Are Determinants of Subclinical Atherosclerosis in a Middle-Aged General Population Stroke, September 1, 2006; 37(9): 2277 - 2282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H.-J. Cho, T.-Y. Kim, H.-J. Cho, K.-W. Park, S.-Y. Zhang, J.-H. Kim, S.-H. Kim, J.-Y. Hahn, H.-J. Kang, Y.-B. Park, et al. The Effect of Stem Cell Mobilization by Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor on Neointimal Hyperplasia and Endothelial Healing After Vascular Injury With Bare-Metal Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 18, 2006; 48(2): 366 - 374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Mieno, B. Ramlawi, M. Boodhwani, R. T. Clements, K. Minamimura, T. Maki, S.-H. Xu, C. Bianchi, J. Li, and F. W. Sellke Role of Stromal-Derived Factor-1{alpha} in the Induction of Circulating CD34+CXCR4+ Progenitor Cells After Cardiac Surgery. Circulation, July 4, 2006; 114(1 Suppl): 186 - 192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]