Brief Reviews |
From the Division of Cardiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322
Correspondence to Kathy K. Griendling, Emory University, Division of Cardiology, 319 WMB 1639 Pierce Dr., Atlanta, GA 30322. E-mail kgriend{at}emory.edu
Much interest has been generated recently concerning the role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in vascular health and disease. The original "oxidative modification hypothesis of atherosclerosis" put forth in the early 1980s by Steinberg and colleagues suggested that oxidative modification of LDL enhanced its atherogenic properties. An explosion of articles in this area substantiated the role of oxidized LDL in atherosclerosis (reviewed by Chisolm and Steinberg1), but recent work has expanded this hypothesis to include a role for free radicals in hypertension,2 the processes leading to restenosis after balloon angioplasty,3 vascular inflammation,4 diabetic vascular disease,5 and angiogenesis.6 Perhaps more importantly, ROS are essential to the normal functioning of the vessel wall, including endothelium-dependent relaxation, contraction, and the smooth muscle cell and endothelial cell growth and survival involved in repair and remodeling of the vessel wall. These diverse and critical roles of ROS in vascular physiology and pathophysiology make understanding the sources of ROS generation of vital importance in the design of therapeutic interventions.
See page 274
Traditionally, macrophages have been assumed to be the source of most of the ROS in the vessel wall. There is no doubt that these cells are powerful ROS generators and that they play an important role in vessel pathology. However, it has become clear that virtually all cells in the vessel wall produce ROS, in varying amounts and in response to diverse stimuli. Endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, and adventitial cells all produce ROS, which can then act in an autocrine or paracrine fashion to modulate cellular function.7 A classic example of this is the inactivation of nitric oxide by superoxide. Superoxide generated by all three cell types can react with NO, thus impairing endothelium-dependent vasodilation.810
Not only are there different cellular sources of ROS, but also cells use different enzymes to produce and scavenge ROS in different circumstances. Ultimately, it is the balance of pro-oxidant and antioxidant enzyme activity that dictates both intracellular and extracellular ROS levels. In the vasculature, three isoforms of superoxide dismutase (SOD), including extracellular SOD, Cu/Zn SOD, and the mitochondrial-restricted MnSOD; catalase; glutathione peroxidase, and thio- and peroxi-redoxins, are mainly responsible for removal of ROS. The enzymes that mediate ROS production vary with the physiological or pathophysiological environment or stimulus. Attention has mainly focused on NAD(P)H oxidases, xanthine oxidase, myeloperoxidase, uncoupled endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), cyclooxygenases, and mitochondria. Thus, mitochondrial-derived ROS are intimately involved in the response to ischemia-reperfusion,11 whereas NAD(P)H oxidases and uncoupled eNOS have been shown to be important in hypertension.12,13 Both NAD(P)H oxidases and xanthine oxidases appear to play a role in atherosclerosis,14 and myeloperoxidase has been shown to be associated with endothelial dysfunction and the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease.15,16 To further complicate matters, ROS produced by one enzyme system often activates a more potent ROS-producing system, as is the case for NAD(P)H oxidase-mediated activation of xanthine oxidase in response to shear stress of endothelial cells,17 or NAD(P)H oxidase-mediated uncoupling of eNOS in hypertension.13
Finally, the identity of the ROS produced can have profound effects on the final physiological response. One of the major consequences of superoxide production is inactivation of nitric oxide, thus limiting relaxation in normal vessels and impairing relaxation in diseased arteries.18 Hypochlorous acid derived from myeloperoxidase also inhibits endothelial function, but by a different mechanism.19 In contrast, H2O2 and other peroxides appear to be more important in regulating growth-related signaling in vascular smooth muscle cells and inflammatory responses in vascular lesions.20 Thus, currently available antioxidants that target only superoxide might not be expected to impact lesion development, whereas scavenging of H2O2 would be expected to be more efficacious.
Given the complexity of ROS-generating systems and cellular antioxidant defenses, as well as their clear relevance to vascular biology and disease, this issue of Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology begins a series of Brief Reviews that addresses sources and scavenging of ROS in blood vessels. Each review will highlight one of the important sources of ROS or antioxidant enzymes in the vessel wall, and will attempt to provide a perspective on its role in vascular physiology. In this issue is the first of these articles, "Redox mechanisms in blood vessels" by Mueller et al, which provides an integration of many of the concepts discussed above and presents a framework for understanding the relationship among these various oxidative and reductive systems. This series as a whole will thus provide a state-of-the-art update on vascular ROS production and it role in cardiovascular physiology and disease.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. I. Mendez, W. J. Nicholson, and W. R. Taylor SOD Isoforms and Signaling in Blood Vessels: Evidence for the Importance of ROS Compartmentalization Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2005; 25(5): 887 - 888. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |