This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 24/5/975    most recent 01.ATV.0000126681.16619.69v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Paffen, E. Articles by Bertina, R. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Paffen, E. Articles by Bertina, R. M. Pubmed/NCBI databases Gene GEO Profiles HomoloGene UniGene Substance via MeSH Related Collections Acute myocardial infarction Arterial thrombosis Coagulation Mechanism of atherosclerosis/growth factors Cell biology/structural biology

(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2004;24:975.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.

Thrombosis

C-Reactive Protein Does Not Directly Induce Tissue Factor in Human Monocytes

Elaine Paffen; Hans L. Vos; Rogier M. Bertina

From the Hemostasis and Thrombosis Research Centre, Department of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Correspondence to Elaine Paffen, Hemostasis and Thrombosis Research Centre, Department of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands. E-mail epaffen{at}lumc.nl

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Objective— It is generally assumed that C-reactive protein (CRP) induces synthesis of tissue factor (TF) in monocytic cells, thereby potentially initiating intravascular blood coagulation. We aimed to elucidate the mechanism of CRP-induced TF expression in monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) in vitro.

Methods and Results— Monocytes were isolated from the blood of healthy donors and cultured with or without CRP or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to study the time course of TF antigen and TF mRNA expression. Addition of 100 µg/mL CRP did not result in a significant increase in TF antigen (range: 9 to 163 pg/10⁶ cells, n=11) and TF mRNA (relative number of TF transcripts; N_TF=0.01 to 0.33), when compared with nonstimulated cells (TF antigen 7 to 46 pg/10⁶ cells, N_TF=0.01 to 0.13). Variation of CRP concentration and exposure time did not affect the TF response. Similar results were obtained in monocytes cultured in suspension and in MDMs. In contrast, TF was strongly induced by 10 µg/mL LPS (TF antigen 1125 to 6120 pg/10⁶ cells, N_TF=5.94 to 23.43). Cultured monocytes did express FcRII, a putative CRP receptor, and addition of CRP induced a 7-fold increase in the production of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1). Interestingly, CRP addition to peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) did result in TF expression on monocytic cells.

Conclusions— The absence of TF induction after incubation of purified monocytes with CRP indicates that CRP is unable to induce TF expression in monocytes and MDMs directly. The presence of CRP-induced TF expression in PBMCs suggests that CRP can induce TF indirectly, probably through cross-talk between cells.

Key Words: C-reactive protein • tissue factor • monocytes • MCP-1 • atherosclerosis

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Atherosclerosis is the major cause of arterial thrombosis and is generally characterized as an inflammatory disease.¹ Peripheral blood monocytes and lymphocytes are recruited to the early atherosclerotic lesion and elicit the inflammatory response. In the arterial intima, monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) accumulate and express tissue factor.² TF, a transmembrane glycoprotein, is the primary initiator of the serine protease cascade of the coagulation system.³ Although TF is not constitutively expressed by cells from the vasculature, various agents can induce TF expression in human monocytes. Inflammatory mediators like bacterial endotoxins (lipopolysaccharides; LPS) or phorbol myristic acid are potent inducers of TF expression by monocytes.^4,5 The mechanism by which TF is induced in the atherosclerotic lesion is not understood, but inducible TF expression has been suggested to play an important role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis.^6,7

In the arterial intima, the acute phase plasma protein C-reactive protein (CRP), which is a marker for inflammation and a predictor for cardiovascular events,^8–10 colocalizes with monocytic cells.^11,12 The serum concentration of CRP, a pentraxin synthesized in the liver, increases >1000-fold on inflammation. CRP amplifies and facilitates innate immunity by binding complement factor C1q and activating the classical complement pathway.^13,14 It also binds to phosphatidylcholine and participates in the clearance of apoptotic and necrotic cells.^15,16 Its role as a procoagulant was first suggested by Whisler,¹⁷ who measured increased procoagulant activity (PCA) in monocytic cells after addition of CRP. Later, CRP was reported to induce synthesis of TF in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs).¹⁸ To date, it is generally assumed that CRP induces TF expression in human monocytes, thus linking inflammation, coagulation, and thrombosis.^19–22 Human monocytes express FcRIIa or CD32, which binds CRP with high affinity and has been described as putative CRP-receptor²³ and FcRI or CD64, which binds CRP with lower affinity.²⁴ However, existence of a third and possibly FcR-independent and still poorly defined CRP-R on monocytes, cannot be excluded.^25–28 Given these multiple manners by which CRP interacts with monocytes, we were interested to learn whether CRP can induce TF in isolated monocytes and, if so, via which mechanism. We report here that CRP does not induce TF expression in monocytes directly, but rather requires other blood cells to mediate its effect.

	Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Reagents
Highly purified (>90%) human CRP (#C-4063) and LPS (from Salmonella typhimurium) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH (Steinheim, Germany). Recombinant human CRP (rhCRP, from Escherichia coli, #236608) and purified CRP (#236603) were derived from Calbiochem (La Jolla, Calif). Only those CRP preparations that contained endotoxin levels <10 pg/mL, as measured in a limulus amebocyte lysate assay (Chromogenix AB, Mölndal, Sweden) were used in our experiments. Human fibronectin was purified from plasma. Hepes-buffered RPMI 1640 was supplemented with 2 mmol/L L-glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin, and heat-inactivated (HI) fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Invitrogen Ltd, Paisley, UK) or human AB serum (HSab) (#H-1513, Sigma). Culture medium with supplements, fibronectin, and HSab all were endotoxin-free (< 10 pg/mL). Antibodies used in flow cytometry were: phycoerythrin (PE) conjugated anti-CD14 (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, Calif) and anti-CD32 (Ancell Laboratories), and FITC-conjugated antitissue factor (American Diagnostica Inc, Greenwich, Conn), anti-CD14, anti-CD45, and anti-CD71 (Becton Dickinson). Total RNA was isolated using RNAeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Germany). Oligo-(dT) primer and superscript II reverse-transcriptase were from Invitrogen. PCR buffer, 3 mmol/L MgCl₂, 0.2 mmol/L dNTPs, and Taq Hot Goldstar polymerase were provided by the qPCR Core kit, which, together with primers and fluorescent TET/TAMRA-labeled probes, were from Eurogentec (Seraing, Belgium).

Monocyte Isolation
Human monocytes were isolated from fresh single-donor buffy coats (Sanquin Bloodbank, NL). PBMCs were isolated by density gradient centrifugation on Ficoll-amidotrizoate (6% Ficoll, 9% Na-amidotrizoate, d=1.077 g/mL) and lysis of erythrocytes. From these PBMCs, a highly purified monocyte population (>95% CD14-positive cells) was obtained by depletion of nonmonocytic cells using magnetic cell sorting technology (MACS) (monocyte isolation kit and Automacs from Miltenyi Biotec GmbH, Bergisch-Gladbach, Germany). Briefly, cells were resuspended in binding buffer (2 mmol/L EDTA, 400 µg/mL human serum albumin, and 1% HSab in PBS) and incubated with hapten-conjugated antibodies against CD3, CD7, CD45RA, CD19, CD56, and IgE for 15 minutes at 4°C in the dark, washed with binding buffer, and incubated with antihapten antibody-conjugated microbeads. The nonlabeled fraction containing the monocytes was recovered by use of a magnetic field.

Cell Culture
Monocytes, 1 to 2x10⁶ cells/mL with a viability >95%, as determined by trypan blue exclusion, were cultured adherent on plastic Petri dishes coated without (Mo-A) or with 50 µg/mL fibronectin (Mo-FA) or in suspension (Mo-S) on Petri dishes with hydrophobic Teflon-FEP film (gauge 25 µm; Janssens NV, St. Niklaas, Belgium) in RPMI 1640 containing 10% HSab HI at 37°C in a humid 5% CO₂ atmosphere. After 2 hours, Mo-FA were washed and fresh medium was added. Stimulation of the cells with CRP or LPS started after 12 hours of culture. PBMCs, 2x10⁶ cells/mL, were cultured on fibronectin-coated Petri dishes with 10% HSab HI.

Antigen Assays
Cells were resuspended in extraction buffer (50 mmol/L EDTA, 100 mmol/L NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, pH 7.5) to prepare cell lysates (1x10⁷ cells/mL) by 4 cycles of freeze-thawing followed by centrifugation. The supernatant cell extract was used for measuring TF antigen (ELISA 845, American Diagnostica Inc). Results were expressed in pg TF antigen/10⁶ cells using the TF standard included in the kit. Interassay variation was monitored using dilutions of Innovin, a source of human TF, as a standard (300 ng/mL; Baxter Diagnostica Inc, Deerfield, Ill). In the cell-free supernatant monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) was measured by Quantakine ELISA (R&D systems, Minneapolis, Minn). Samples were tested in 3 different dilutions in duplicate.

Flow Cytometry
Harvested cells were incubated with diluted PE-conjugated and FITC-conjugated antibodies at 4°C for 40 minutes. Afterward, cells were washed in PBS with 0.1% BSA, pelleted by centrifugation, and fixed with 100 µL 1% paraformaldehyde. Fluorescence was analyzed on a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson) counting 10 000 events per sample. Data acquisition and analysis were performed using CellQuest software. Cells were gated using forward light scatter (FSC) versus sideward light scatter (SSC). Surface expression of CD71 and CD32 was described as percentage of CD14⁺ cells and corrected for nonspecific staining by subtracting the fluorescence of cells stained with a nonspecific isotype antibody.

Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Total RNA (1 µg) was reverse-transcribed with 0.5-µg oligo-(dT) primer using 10 U/mL superscript II reverse transcriptase in 20 µL RNA reaction buffer. Reverse-transcribed materials were amplified with Taq Hot Goldstar DNA polymerase by adding TET(5')/TAMRA(3') fluorescent labeled probe (5'-CCCGTGCCAAGTAC-GTCTGCTTCACA-3') and sense and antisense primers specific for human TF mRNA (sense primer, 5'-GGAACCCAAACCCGTC-AATC-3'; antisense primer, 5'-TCCGAGGTTTGTCTCCAGGT-3') or the TET(5')/TAMRA(3') fluorescent-labeled probe (5'-ACCAGCAGCAAGTGTCCCAAAGAAGCT-3') and sense and antisense primers specific for human MCP-1 mRNA (sense primer, 5'-CGCTCAGCCAGATGCAATC-3'; antisense primer, 5'-TTGTCCAGGTGGTCCATGG-3'). ß-Actin cDNA amplification was performed in the same way using (TET(5')/ TAMRA(3') fluorescent-labeled probe 5'-TGATCTGGGTCATCTTCTCGCGGTTG-3', sense primer, 5'-AGGCACCAGGGCGTGATG-3'; and antisense primer, 5'-GCCTGGATAGCAACGTACATGG-3'. Quantitative TF mRNA expression was assessed by use of real-time Taqman PCR technology (ABI Prism 7700 Sequence Detection System; Perkin Elmer Applied Biosystems). The PCR reaction consists of a 2-step protocol: 10 minutes at 95°C, and 55 cycles amplification at 95°C for 15 seconds, and 60°C for 1 minute. The number of cycles in which the fluorescence of the amplified fragment exceeds the fluorescent background threshold is a measure for the concentration of TF cDNA in the sample. This value for the number of cycles in which the fluorescence of the amplified fragment exceeds the fluorescent background threshold was designated by additional software (PE Applied Biosystems-Sequence Detection Systems 1.7). TF mRNA was expressed as the ratio of the number of TF transcripts relative to the number of ß-actin transcripts (N_TF=2^Ct).

Statistical Methods
Statistical analysis was performed using the paired samples t test using SPSS 11.0 software.

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Effect of CRP and LPS on TF Antigen Expression of Purified Human Monocytes in Culture
Addition of 20 µg/mL CRP to Mo-FA of 3 independent donors did not result in TF antigen expression significantly different from that in unstimulated monocytes. In contrast, addition of LPS to these cells resulted in strong expression of TF-antigen, although the degree of induction varied considerably from donor to donor. Further increasing the CRP concentration to 100 µg/mL did not result in induction of TF antigen (Table 1A). TF antigen in cell lysates of monocytes treated with CRP ranged from 9 to 163 pg/10⁶ cells with a median of 64 pg/10⁶ cells (Table 1A). Unstimulated cells did express similar levels of TF antigen (7 to 46 pg/10⁶ cells, median of 12 pg/10⁶ cells). Stimulation of Mo-FA with 10 µg/mL LPS resulted in strong induction of TF antigen (1125 to 6120 pg/10⁶ cells, median of 3606 pg/10⁶ cells) and TF cell surface expression (30% to 92% TF⁺CD14⁺ cells, median of 57%). Mo-FA contained >95% CD14⁺ cells and 66% to 100% of the monocytes expressed the putative CRP receptor (FcRII or CD32; Figure 1A). Variation in the length of the incubation period (1 to 24 hours) emphasized the widely different effects of LPS and CRP on TF expression (Figure 2). TF antigen expression was induced by LPS and peaked at 6 to 8 hours of stimulation, whereas CRP had no effect on TF antigen expression.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 1. Induction of TF Antigen and mRNA Expression in Monocytes and MDM by CRP and LPS

View larger version (44K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. FACS analysis of cell surface expression of Mo-FA or MDMs (A) and PBMCs (B) cultured in presence or absence of 100 µg/mL CRP or 10 µg/mL LPS. A-1, CD32 PE and CD14 FITC expression of control Mo-FA. A-2, CD14 PE and CD71 FITC expression of control MDM. A-3, CD14 PE and TF FITC expression of control Mo-FA. A-4, CD14 PE and TF FITC expression of Mo-FA stimulated with LPS for 8 hours. B-1, CD14 PE and CD45 FITC expression of control PBMCs. B-2, CD32 PE and CD14 FITC expression of control PBMCs. B-3, CD14 PE and TF FITC expression of control PBMCs. B-4, CD14 PE and TF FITC expression of PBMCs stimulated with CRP for 6 hours. The figure summarizes the results of representative experiments.

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Effect of CRP and LPS on TF antigen (solid line) and TF mRNA (dashed line) expression of monocytes cultured on fibronectin (Mo-FA); 100 µg/mL CRP () or 10 µg/mL LPS () were incubated with Mo-FA (control ) for 1 to 24 hours. After stimulation either cell extracts were prepared for TF antigen analysis or RNA was isolated to measure TF mRNA. The figure summarizes the results of a representative experiment.

Effect of CRP and LPS on TF mRNA Expression of Mo-FA
Because we could not detect TF expression at the protein level, and because CRP has been described to induce de novo TF synthesis,¹⁸ we also studied the effect of CRP on TF mRNA levels in cells from the same cultures used for measuring protein expression. Addition of CRP did not result in increased TF mRNA (N_TF=0.01 to 0.33, median N_TF=0.04) compared with unstimulated cells (N_TF=0.01 to 0.13, median N_TF=0.03). In contrast, addition of 10 µg/mL LPS resulted in a 300-fold increase in the level of TF mRNA (N_TF=5.94 to 23.43, median N_TF=9.29) compared with control cells (Table 1A). As expected, LPS-induced TF mRNA expression peaked at 4 hours, whereas no CRP-induced TF mRNA expression was observed (Figure 2).

Influence of Culture Conditions
Most studies that reported on CRP-induced TF expression in monocytes used cells purified by adherence to plastic culture dishes.^18,29–31 However, culturing cells in suspension may represent a more natural state for peripheral blood monocytes and may influence cell susceptibility to a stimulus.^32–34 We therefore cultured monocytes from the same donor in 3 different ways: adhering to fibronectin-coated Petri dishes (Mo-FA; see Table 1A), adhering to plastic (Mo-A, unpublished data 2003), and in suspension on a Teflon membrane (Mo-S; see Table 1B). Although there were clear morphological differences between these differently cultured monocytes, none of the cultures expressed TF on stimulation by CRP. Only LPS was capable of inducing TF antigen and mRNA expression (Table 1B).

Effect of CRP and LPS on TF Expression of MDMs
To assess if differentiated monocytes responded differently to CRP, we investigated the effect of CRP on TF expression of MDMs. During prolongation of the monocyte culture, cells spontaneously differentiate and mature into macrophages in vitro.³⁵ MDMs were characterized by expression of the macrophage-specific transferrin-receptor (CD71) by FACS. On day 4 of the culture, 95% of the living cells had differentiated into MDMs (Figure 1A). In 4 independent experiments stimulation of MDMs for 8 hours with 100 µg/mL, CRP resulted in some TF antigen expression (78 to 313 pg/10⁶ cells, median 151 pg/10⁶ cells) compared with unstimulated cells (24 to 53 pg/10⁶ cells, median 25 pg/10⁶ cells), but far less than expressed after stimulation with 10 µg/mL LPS (496 to 3151 pg/10⁶ cells, median 1016 pg/10⁶ cells; Table 1C). In the same stimulated cells, TF mRNA expression was increased after stimulation with LPS (N_TF=15.35 to 22.64, median 17.89; Table 1C). However, CRP-stimulated MDMs expressed similar levels of TF mRNA (N_TF=0.04 to 0.26, median 0.15) as unstimulated cells (N_TF=0.06 to 0.52, median 0.16; Table 1C). Figure 3 shows the time course of TF mRNA and TF antigen expression after stimulation of MDMs with CRP or LPS. MDMs are extremely sensitive to low concentrations of LPS; even 10 pg/mL, which is close to the detection limit of the limulus amebocyte lysate assay, was able to elicit a significant response.^36,37 Because of this extreme sensitivity to LPS, which may lead to spurious TF expression in the CRP experiments, and because of the discrepancy between the mRNA and protein data, we conclude that TF expression in MDMs is not stimulated by CRP.

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Effect of CRP and LPS on TF antigen (solid line) and TF mRNA (dashed line) expression of monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM) cultured on fibronectin; 100 µg/mL CRP () or 10 µg/mL LPS () were incubated with MDM (control ) for 1 to 24 hours. After stimulation, either cell extracts were prepared for TF antigen analysis or RNA was isolated to measure TF mRNA. The figure summarizes the results of a representative experiment.

Functionality of CRP Preparations: Induction of Monocytic MCP-1 Expression
The negative results reported raised the question whether the CRP preparations used have biological activity and whether the monocytic cells have a functional response system toward CRP. We tested this by measuring its effect on the secretion of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) in the conditioned medium of cultured monocytes. A synthetic peptide derived from CRP has been found to increase the expression of the chemokine MCP-1 by monocytes,³⁸ and also in human umbilical vein cells, CRP did induce MCP-1 expression.³⁹ Very large differences in MCP-1 expression exist between monocytes from different donors. The average stimulation of MCP-1 production by CRP was 7-fold in Mo-FA from 11 different donors (range: 2.3 to 20.9). Addition of 100 µg/mL CRP during 8 hours resulted in increased MCP-1 antigen (range from 0.28 to 23.45 ng/10⁶ cells with a median of 6.92), as well as increased MCP-1 mRNA levels (median N_MCP-1 =1193) compared with unstimulated cells (0.12 to 7.62 ng/10⁶ cells antigen with median 1.83 and mRNA median N_MCP-1=107). This indicated a specific biological response of the monocytes to CRP. It proved that the CRP preparations were functional and that the cells have an intact response system toward CRP. Increased MCP-1 expression caused by CRP was similar or even exceeded the effect of LPS on MCP-1 expression. Addition of 10 µg/mL LPS to Mo-FA during 8 hours induced MCP-1 antigen (1.13 to 28.35 ng/10⁶ cells with median 6.31) and mRNA expression (median N_MCP-1=3040).

Effect of CRP on TF Expression in Cultured PBMCs
So far, we have been unable to demonstrate that CRP induces TF antigen and/or mRNA in highly purified human monocytes in vitro. Previous reports on CRP-induced TF expression have used PBMCs or monocytes purified from PBMCs by adherence, which still contained a significant percentage of nonmonocytic cells.^18,31 Therefore, we investigated the effect of CRP on TF expression by monocytes cultured in the presence of other leukocytes. In these experiments, we cultured the complete PBMC preparation, which contains 10% to 30% monocytes as judged by CD14 positivity. In the PBMCs, CD32 was expressed not only by monocytes but also by other cell types (Figure 1B). Interestingly, in these cultures, CRP addition resulted in increased TF expression on the monocytes compared with control cultures (Table 2). FACS analysis showed that all TF expression originated from CD14-positive cells (Figure 1B). CRP induced TF mRNA after 4 to 6 hours and TF antigen after 6 to 8 hours of incubation (Figure 4).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 2. Induction of TF Antigen and mRNA Expression in PBMCs by CRP and LPS

View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4. Effect of CRP and LPS on TF antigen (solid line) and TF mRNA (dashed line) expression of PBMCs cultured on fibronectin. 100 µg/mL CRP () or 10 µg/mL LPS () were incubated with PBMC (control ) for 1 to 24 hours. After stimulation either cell extracts were prepared for TF antigen analysis or RNA was isolated to measure TF mRNA. The figure summarizes the results of a representative experiment.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
It has been generally accepted that CRP induces TF expression in monocytic cells.^17,18 This induction of TF, the initiator of blood coagulation, by the acute phase protein CRP has often been described as one of the mechanisms that link inflammation, coagulation, and thrombosis.^19–22 In atherosclerotic lesions, CRP is present and TF is expressed by monocytes/macrophages recruited from the blood by the inflammatory signals. On rupture of the unstable plaque, this TF is exposed to the blood, initiates coagulation, and contributes to thrombus formation. Therefore, TF has been proposed to be a key mediator of thrombosis in atherosclerosis.^6,7 In addition, CRP has been described to be a strong predictor for cardiovascular risk.¹⁰ Although many reviews refer to CRP-mediated induction of TF in monocytic cells,^8,9 we were unable to demonstrate CRP-induced TF expression in highly purified human monocytes. We demonstrated that variations in CRP concentrations (20 to 100 µg/mL) in culture conditions (adherent versus suspension cells) or in incubation time (1 to 24 hours) did not lead to TF expression, neither at the level of TF antigen nor at the level of TF mRNA. When recombinant human CRP was used to stimulate monocytic TF expression, it also seemed to fail in inducing TF expression, but these experiments could not be repeated because of the fact that subsequent preparations all were contaminated with endotoxin (20 to 660 pg/100 µg CRP).

CRP has different functions: it binds to complement factor C1q, phosphatidylcholine, nuclear constituents, or low-density lipoproteins or very LDL (LDL or VLDL), and CRP binds to an aspecific set of receptors. When CRP binds to C1q, it activates the classical pathway of the complement system.^13,14 When CRP binds to phosphatidylcholine and LDL, it aids in opsonization and priming for phagocytosis.^16,40 But it is largely unknown which cellular events are triggered by binding of CRP to a receptor. In our study, we confirmed that CD32, the putative CRP receptor, was expressed on Mo-FA, MDM, and in PBMCs. However, it cannot be excluded that binding of CRP to another CRP-R is needed to evoke a cellular response.^26,27 Indirect interaction of CRP by binding C1q present on the cell surface of monocytic cells was made unlikely by heat inactivation of the human AB serum used in the culture medium. AB serum also contains VLDL, and VLDL has been described to bind CRP.⁴¹ However, the VLDL concentration in this serum was so low (0.016 mmol/L) that we can exclude the possibility that VLDL competes away all CRP from the cells.

The effect of CRP on MDMs was similar in dose and time course to that on monocytes. The small increase in TF antigen expression sometimes observed after stimulation with CRP could have been the effect of a very small amount of endotoxin present in the CRP preparations. MDMs are known to be much more sensitive to LPS than monocytes.³⁶ Like in monocytes, CRP addition increases MCP-1 production in MDMs (unpublished data, 2003). However, the 2-fold increase in MCP-1 production by MDMs after CRP addition is lower than the induction in Mo-FA, probably because of the higher basal levels of MCP-1 expression by control MDMs. CRP-induced MCP-1 expression in human monocytes and MDMs indicates that the cell are responsive to the CRP preparations used and that the preparations are biologically active.

Our results show that CRP induces MCP-1 antigen and mRNA expression in Mo-FA. MCP-1, or small inducible cytokine A2, is a CC-chemokine chemotactic for human peripheral monocytes. Synthesis of MCP-1 by blood leukocytes has been described to be induced by LPS and cytokines as IL-1.⁴² MCP-1 is present in human atherosclerotic plaques.⁴³ CRP-induced MCP-1 expression has been described before,^39,44 but the mechanism of induced MCP-1 expression in human monocytes is not clear. Interestingly, MCP-1 has been reported to induce TF in monocytes⁴⁵ at doses easily produced in our cell cultures. We could not confirm this finding using isolated monocytes in culture and MCP-1 concentrations up to 20 nM.

Having established that the monocytes were responsive to the CRP preparations and that differences in culture conditions and differentiation state could not account for the absence of TF expression in isolated monocytes, we turned to PBMC cultures, in which the monocytes were cultured in the presence of other leukocytes. Remarkably, we measured increased TF antigen as well as increased TF mRNA expression in PBMCs after CRP addition (Figure 1B and Table 2). This resembles the observations described by Cermak et al.¹⁸ We did not find that CRP was a stronger inducer of TF expression in PBMCs than LPS, although the levels of induced TF expression in PBMCs varied considerably between different donors. FACS analysis demonstrated that the expressed TF derives from monocytes present in the PBMCs culture. Also, we demonstrated that cultures of purified monocytes do not respond to CRP with increased TF expression. Therefore, it can be concluded that cell–cell interactions or other forms of cross-talk between cells are required for CRP induction of TF in vitro. This is supported by the in vivo observation that elevated serum CRP in patients with various diseases seems to be correlated to TF mRNA expression of leukocytes.⁴⁶ The possibility of CRP being an indirect inducer of TF expression by monocytes has been described earlier. More specifically, it has been suggested that the presence of IFN, secreted by activated T-lymphocytes, modulates TF expression of monocytes.³⁰ Preliminary experiments did not reveal any effect of IFN or CD40 ligand on TF expression in isolated monocytes.

That an acute phase protein might exert modulating effects on TF expression has been recently described by Napoleone et al, who reported that PTX3 enhanced the TF response of human umbilical vein cells stimulated by IL-1ß and TNF.⁴⁷

In conclusion, our studies indicate that the induction of TF by CRP is a much more complicated process than initially reported, and further studies are needed to identify the signaling pathways that contribute to this potentially important link between inflammation and thrombosis.

	Acknowledgments

 
Acknowledgments

The authors thank I. K. van der Linden for technical assistance. This work was supported by a grant of the Netherlands Heart Foundation (NHS 98090).

Received September 30, 2003; accepted March 16, 2004.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 

1. Ross R. Atherosclerosis–an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340: 115–126.[Free Full Text]
2. Marmur JD, Thiruvikraman SV, Fyfe BS, Guha A, Sharma SK, Ambrose JA, Fallon JT, Nemerson Y, Taubman MB. Identification of active tissue factor in human coronary atheroma. Circulation. 1996; 94: 1226–1232.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Edgington TS, Ruf W, Rehemtulla A, Mackman N. The molecular biology of initiation of coagulation by tissue factor. Curr Stud Hematol Blood Transfus. 1991; 15–21.
4. Mackman N. Lipopolysaccharide induction of gene expression in human monocytic cells. Immunol Res. 2000; 21: 247–251.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Lyberg T, Prydz H. Phorbol esters induce synthesis of thromboplastin activity in human monocytes. Biochem J. 1981; 194: 699–706.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Ardissino D, Angelica Merlini P, Ariens R, Coppola R, Bramucci E, Mannuccio Mannucci P. Tissue-factor antigen and activity in human coronary atherosclerotic plaques. Lancet. 1997; 349: 769–771.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Osterud B. Tissue factor expression by monocytes: regulation and pathophysiological roles. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 1998; 9: S9–S14.
8. Gabay C, Kushner I. Acute-phase proteins and other systemic responses to inflammation. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340: 448–454.[Free Full Text]
9. Pepys MB, Hirschfield GM. C-reactive protein: a critical update. J Clin Invest. 2003; 111: 1805–1812.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Haverkate F, Thompson SG, Pyke SD, Gallimore JR, Pepys MB. Production of C-reactive protein and risk of coronary events in stable and unstable angina. European Concerted Action on Thrombosis and Disabilities Angina Pectoris Study Group. Lancet. 1997; 349: 462–466.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Reynolds GD, Vance RP. C-reactive protein immunohistochemical localization in normal and atherosclerotic human aortas. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1987; 111: 265–269.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Torzewski M, Rist C, Mortensen RF, Zwaka TP, Bienek M, Waltenberger J, Koenig W, Schmitz G, Hombach V, Torzewski J. C-reactive protein in the arterial intima: role of C-reactive protein receptor-dependent monocyte recruitment in atherogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000; 20: 2094–2099.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Volanakis JE, Kaplan MH. Interaction of C-reactive protein complexes with the complement system. II. Consumption of guinea pig complement by CRP complexes: requirement for human C1q. J Immunol. 1974; 113: 9–17.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Torzewski J, Torzewski M, Bowyer DE, Frohlich M, Koenig W, Waltenberger J, Fitzsimmons C, Hombach V. C-reactive protein frequently colocalizes with the terminal complement complex in the intima of early atherosclerotic lesions of human coronary arteries. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998; 18: 1386–1392.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Du Clos TW. Function of C-reactive protein. Ann Med. 2000; 32: 274–278.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Chang MK, Binder CJ, Torzewski M, Witztum JL. From the Cover: C-reactive protein binds to both oxidized LDL and apoptotic cells through recognition of a common ligand: Phosphorylcholine of oxidized phospholipids. PNAS. 2002; 99: 13043.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Whisler RL, Proctor VK, Downs EC, Mortensen RF. Modulation of human monocyte chemotaxis and procoagulant activity by human C-reactive protein (CRP). Lymphokine Res. 1986; 5: 223–228.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Cermak J, Key NS, Bach RR, Balla J, Jacob HS, Vercellotti GM. C-reactive protein induces human peripheral blood monocytes to synthesize tissue factor. Blood. 1993; 82: 513–520.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Penn MS, Topol EJ. Tissue factor, the emerging link between inflammation, thrombosis, and vascular remodeling. Circ Res. 2001; 89: 1–2.[Free Full Text]
20. Pepys MB, Hirschfield GM. C-reactive protein and atherothrombosis. Ital Heart J. 2001; 2: 196–199.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Libby P, Simon DI. Inflammation and thrombosis: the clot thickens. Circulation. 2001; 103: 1718–1720.[Free Full Text]
22. Yeh ET, Anderson HV, Pasceri V, Willerson JT. C-reactive protein: linking inflammation to cardiovascular complications. Circulation. 2001; 104: 974–975.[Free Full Text]
23. Bharadwaj D, Stein MP, Volzer M, Mold C, Du Clos TW. The major receptor for C-reactive protein on leukocytes is fcgamma receptor II. J Exp Med. 1999; 190: 585–590.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Crowell RE, Du Clos TW, Montoya G, Heaphy E, Mold C. C-reactive protein receptors on the human monocytic cell line U-937. Evidence for additional binding to Fc gamma RI. J Immunol. 1991; 147: 3445–3451.[Abstract]
25. Ballou SP, Cleveland RP. Binding of human C-reactive protein to monocytes: analysis by flow cytometry. Clin Exp Immunol. 1991; 84: 329–335.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Hundt M, Zielinska-Skowronek M, Schmidt RE. Lack of specific receptors for C-reactive protein on white blood cells. Eur J Immunol. 2001; 31: 3475–3483.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Mortensen RF, Zhong W. Regulation of phagocytic leukocyte activities by C-reactive protein. J Leukoc Biol. 2000; 67: 495–500.[Abstract]
28. Saeland E, van Royen A, Hendriksen K, Vile-Weekhout H, Rijkers GT, Sanders LAM, van de Winkel JGJ. Human C-reactive protein does not bind to fcgammaRIIa on phagocyti cells. J Clin Invest. 2001; 107: 641.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Ramani M, Khechai F, Ollivier V, Ternisien C, Bridey F, Hakim J, de Prost D. Interleukin-10 and pentoxifylline inhibit C-reactive protein-induced tissue factor gene expression in peripheral human blood monocytes. FEBS Lett. 1994; 356: 86–88.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Nakagomi A, Freedman SB, Geczy CL. Interferon-gamma and lipopolysaccharide potentiate monocyte tissue factor induction by C-reactive protein: relationship with age, sex, and hormone replacement treatment. Circulation. 2000; 101: 1785–1791.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Ernofsson M, Tenno T, Siegbahn A. Inhibition of tissue factor surface expression in human peripheral blood monocytes exposed to cytokines. Br J Haematol. 1996; 95: 249–257.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. van Ginkel CJ, van Aken WG, Oh JI, Vreeken J. Stimulation of monocyte procoagulant activity by adherence to different surfaces. Br J Haematol. 1977; 37: 35–45.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Osterud B. Cellular interactions in tissue factor expression by blood monocytes. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 1995; 6: S20–S25.
34. Bernardo J, Billingslea AM, Ortiz MF, Seetoo KF, Macauley J, Simons ER. Adherence-dependent calcium signaling in monocytes: induction of a CD14-high phenotype, stimulus-responsive subpopulation. J Immunol Meth. 1997; 209: 165–175.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Andreesen R, Osterholz J, Bodemann H, Bross KJ, Costabel U, Lohr GW. Expression of transferrin receptors and intracellular ferritin during terminal differentiation of human monocytes. Blut. 1984; 49: 195–202.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Jungi TW, Miserez R, Brcic M, Pfister H. Change in sensitivity to lipopolysaccharide during the differentiation of human monocytes to macrophages in vitro. Experientia. 1994; 50: 110–114.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Kreutz M, Hennemann B, Ackermann U, Grage-griebenow E, Krause SW, Andreesen R. Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor modulates lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding and LPS-response of human macrophages: inverse regulation of tumour necrosis factor- and interleukin-10. Immunology. 1999; 98: 491–496.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Zhou P, Thomassen MJ, Pettay J, Deodhar SD, Barna BP. Human monocytes produce monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) in response to a synthetic peptide derived from C-reactive protein. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1995; 74: 84–88.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Pasceri V, Chang J, Willerson JT, Yeh ET. Modulation of C-reactive protein-mediated monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 induction in human endothelial cells by anti-atherosclerosis drugs. Circulation. 2001; 103: 2531–2534.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Zwaka TP, Hombach V, Torzewski J. C-reactive protein-mediated low density lipoprotein uptake by macrophages: implications for atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2001; 103: 1194–1197.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Toh CH, Samis J, Downey C, Walker J, Becker L, Brufatto N, Tejidor L, Jones G, Houdijk W, Giles A, Koschinsky M, Ticknor LO, Paton R, Wenstone R, Nesheim M. Biphasic transmittance waveform in the APTT coagulation assay is due to the formation of a Ca++-dependent complex of C-reactive protein with very-low-density lipoprotein and is a novel marker of impending disseminated intravascular coagulation. Blood. 2002; 100: 2522–2529.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Yoshimura T, Yuhki N, Moore SK, Appella E, Lerman MI, Leonard EJ. Human monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1). Full-length cDNA cloning, expression in mitogen-stimulated blood mononuclear leukocytes, and sequence similarity to mouse competence gene JE. FEBS Lett. 1989; 244: 487–493.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Nelken NA, Coughlin SR, Gordon D, Wilcox JN. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in human atheromatous plaques. J Clin Invest. 1991; 88: 1121–1127.
44. Thomassen MJ, Meeker DP, Deodhar SD, Wiedemann HP, Barna BP. Activation of human monocytes and alveolar macrophages by a synthetic peptide of C-reactive protein. J Immunother. 1993; 13: 1–6.
45. Ernofsson M, Siegbahn A. Platelet-derived growth factor-BB and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 induce human peripheral blood monocytes to express tissue factor. Thromb Res. 1996; 83: 307–320.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Sase T, Wada H, Nishioka J, Abe Y, Gabazza EC, Shiku H, Suzuki K, Nakamura S, Nobori T. Measurement of tissue factor messenger RNA levels in leukocytes from patients in hypercoagulable state caused by several underlying diseases. Thromb Haemost. 2003; 89: 660–665.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Napoleone E, Di Santo A, Bastone A, Peri G, Mantovani A, de Gaetano G, Donati MB, Lorenzet R. Long pentraxin PTX3 upregulates tissue factor expression in human endothelial cells: a novel link between vascular inflammation and clotting activation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002; 22: 782–787.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. Sardo, S. Campo, G. Mandraffino, C. Saitta, A. Bonaiuto, M. Castaldo, M. Cinquegrani, G. Pizzimenti, and A. Saitta Tissue Factor and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 Expression in Hypertensive Individuals with Normal or Increased Carotid Intima-Media Wall Thickness Clin. Chem., May 1, 2008; 54(5): 814 - 823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Cai, C. Song, I. Endoh, J. Goyette, W. Jessup, S. B. Freedman, H. P. McNeil, and C. L. Geczy Serum Amyloid A Induces Monocyte Tissue Factor J. Immunol., February 1, 2007; 178(3): 1852 - 1860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Paffen and M. P.M. deMaat C-reactive protein in atherosclerosis: A causal factor? Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 2006; 71(1): 30 - 39. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. M. Scirica, D. A. Morrow, S. Verma, S. Devaraj, I. Jialal, B. M. Scirica, D. A. Morrow, S. Verma, S. Devaraj, and I. Jialal The Verdict Is Still Out Circulation, May 2, 2006; 113(17): 2128 - 2151. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Zhang and L. M. Wahl Synergistic enhancement of cytokine-induced human monocyte matrix metalloproteinase-1 by C-reactive protein and oxidized LDL through differential regulation of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 and prostaglandin E2 J. Leukoc. Biol., January 1, 2006; 79(1): 105 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Pandolfi C-reactive protein: A potential new molecular link between inflammation, thrombosis and vascular cell proliferation? Cardiovasc Res, October 1, 2005; 68(1): 3 - 4. [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 24/5/975    most recent 01.ATV.0000126681.16619.69v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Paffen, E. Articles by Bertina, R. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Paffen, E. Articles by Bertina, R. M. Pubmed/NCBI databases Gene GEO Profiles HomoloGene UniGene Substance via MeSH Related Collections Acute myocardial infarction Arterial thrombosis Coagulation Mechanism of atherosclerosis/growth factors Cell biology/structural biology