doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000142384.70383.ea
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
Letters to the Editor |
Clinical Significance of Coronary Calcification
Department of Cardiology, University Clinic Essen, Germany
To the Editor:
We read with interest the review by Abedin et al, who provide valuable insights into the mechanisms of vascular calcification and teleological concepts.1 However, regarding the clinical ramifications, they make diverse statements. We agree that, in patients selected by knowledgeable physicians, coronary artery calcification can be used "... for identifying patients at risk for adverse cardiac events." This position has been adopted in American and European guidelines.2,3 However, only 2 paragraphs below, the authors state that "a consensus has developed that coronary calcification is associated with chronic symptomatic coronary artery disease rather than with acute coronary events... " and that "these findings have been interpreted as evidence that vascular calcification is protective against acute events." We believe these statements are misleading. They are based on perceptions from cross-sectional data comparing patients who present with acute coronary syndromes and chronic stable angina pectoris. In many patients, the acute coronary syndrome is the first manifestation of coronary artery disease,4 whereas many patients with chronic disease have a long-standing diagnosis. When comparing findings in unstable and stable patients, the different medical history and time course of the disease needs to be taken into account. Intravascular ultrasound studies have produced contradictory results and have in part observed that calcification appeared neutral or even associated with acute coronary events.5,6
A series of histopathologic reports have been published by the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology group that characterize the relationship between plaque rupture and calcification in some detail.7–10 These reports demonstrate that calcification is a frequent feature of plaque rupture in victims of sudden coronary death, even in young adults. Among all types of histologically defined types of plaques, acute ruptures were calcified most frequently (80%), whereas healed ruptures were calcified most extensively.8 Plaque erosions, on the other hand, were associated with little calcium.7 Calcification was found preferentially in plaques with expansive ("positive") arterial remodeling,10 known to be associated with an increased risk of rupture.11
Most importantly, a number of prospective studies have consistently reported that the degree of coronary calcification is predictive of hard coronary events (for review, see Rumberger12). Abedin et al quote the only study that has ever reported a negative finding in that coronary calcification was not better than risk factors and ECG in predicting hard coronary events.13 However, follow-up reports from the same study have reported superior predictive ability of the coronary calcium score,14,15 in line with 4 large independent studies (see Rumberger12 for review) and 2 preliminary reports from the truly unselected general population.16,17 Measured in the clinical setting, coronary calcification clearly does not indicate protection but rather a relevant increase in coronary risk. It is our task as physicians to reduce that risk.
References
1. Abedin M, Tintut Y, Demer LL. Vascular Calcification. Mechanisms and Clinical Ramifications. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24: 1161–1170.
2. Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) Final Report. Circulation. 2002; 106: 3143–3421.
3. De Backer G, Ambrosioni E, Borch-Johnsen K, Brotons C, Cifkova R, Dallongeville J, Ebrahim S, Faergeman O, Graham I, Mancia G, Manger Cats V, Orth-Gomer K, Perk J, Pyorala K, Rodicio JL, Sans S, Sansoy V, Sechtem U, Silber S, Thomsen T, Wood D; Third Joint Task Force of European and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. Executive Summary. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2003; 24: 1601–1610.
4. Am Heart Association Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: 2004 Update. Available at: http://www.americanheart.org/downloadable/heart/1079736729696HDSStats2004UpdateREV3–19-04.pdf. Accessed July 19, 2004.
5. de Feyter PJ, Ozaki Y, Baptista J, Escaned J, Di Mario C, de Jaegere PP, Serruys PW, Roelandt JR. Ischemia-related lesion characteristics in patients with stable or unstable angina. A study with intracoronary angioscopy and ultrasound. Circulation. 1995; 92: 1408–1413.
6. Abizaid AS, Mintz GS, Abizaid A, Mehran R, Lansky AJ, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Wu H, Kent KM, Leon MB. One-year follow-up after intravascular-ultrasound assessment of moderate left main coronary artery disease in patients with ambiguous angiograms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 34: 707–715.
7. Farb A, Burke AP, Tang AL, Liang TY, Mannan P, Smialek J, Virmani R. Coronary plaque erosion without rupture into a lipid core. A frequent cause of coronary thrombosis in sudden coronary death. Circulation. 1996; 93: 1354–1364.
8. Burke AP, Taylor A, Farb A, Malcom GT, Virmani R. Coronary calcification: insights from sudden coronary death victims. Z Kardiol. 2000; 89 Suppl 2: 49–53.
9. Burke AP, Kolodgie FD, Farb A, Weber DK, Malcom GT, Smialek J, Virmani R. Healed plaque ruptures and sudden coronary death: evidence that subclinical rupture has a role in plaque progression. Circulation. 2001; 103: 934–940.
10. Burke AP, Kolodgie FD, Farb A, Weber D, Virmani R. Morphological predictors of arterial remodeling in coronary atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2002; 105: 297–303.
11. Ward MR, Pasterkamp G, Yeung AC, Borst C. Arterial remodeling. Mechanisms and clinical implications. Circulation. 2000; 102: 1186–1191.
12. Rumberger JA. Clinical use of coronary calcium scanning with computed tomography. Cardiol Clin. 2003; 21: 535–547.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Detrano RC, Wong ND, Doherty TM, Shavelle RM, Tang W, Ginzton LE, Budoff MJ, Narahara KA. Coronary calcium does not accurately predict near-term future coronary events in high-risk adults [published errata in Circulation 2000;101:697 and Circulation 2000;101:1355]. Circulation. 1999; 99: 2633–2638.
14. Park R, Detrano R, Xiang M, Fu P, Ibrahim Y, LaBree L, Azen S. Combined use of computed tomography coronary calcium scores and C-reactive protein levels in predicting cardiovascular events in nondiabetic individuals. Circulation. 2002; 106: 2073–2077.
15. Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen SP, Doherty TM, Detrano RC. Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA. 2004; 291: 210–215.
16. Arad Y, Roth M, Newstein D, Guerci A. Coronary calcification, coronary disease risk factors, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events: the St. Francis Heart Study. Hotline Session, ACC 2003.
17. Vliegenthart R. Coronary Calcification and the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease. An Epidemiologic Study. [PhD thesis]. Netherlands: Thoraxcentre Rotterdam; 2003.
Clinical Significance of Vascular Calcification
Departments of Medicine, Physiology, and Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles
In response:
We were pleased to read the letter from Drs Schmermund and Erbel concerning our review on vascular calcification. In their letter, they point out the strong evidence that vascular calcification increases the risk of acute coronary events. We agree entirely with their view. Our reference to the concept that calcification is protective was merely intended to preface our analysis dispelling the notion. Our theoretical analysis showed that, as total calcification burden increases, the hard-soft interface area (hence rupture risk) peaks at intermediate levels of calcification due to coalescence. With progression, the interface area may decline but remains higher than in noncalcified plaque. Thus, both clinical and theoretical evidence support the concept that vascular calcification increases risk. We regret that our article was not clear on this point, and we greatly appreciate the important clarification provided by Drs Schmermund and Erbel.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  L. L. Demer, A. P. Sage, and Y. Tintut Nanoscale Architecture in Atherosclerotic Calcification Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, November 1, 2008; 28(11): 1882 - 1884. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||