Published online before print August 12, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000142363.15113.88
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
Brief Reviews |
Endothelium-Targeted Gene and Cell-Based Therapies for Cardiovascular Disease
From the Department of Physiology (L.G.M., K.W., X.L.), Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; and the Department of Medicine (L.G.M., M.G., A.S.P., D.K., R.E.P., V.J.D.), Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Correspondence to Dr Luis G. Melo, Department of Physiology, Queen’s University, 18 Stuart Street, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada. E-mail melol{at}post.queensu.ca
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Top
Abstract
IntroductionMost common cardiovascular diseases are accompanied by endothelial dysfunction. Because of its predominant role in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease, the vascular endothelium is an attractive therapeutic target. The identification of promoter sequences capable of rendering endothelial-specific transgene expression together with the recent development of vectors with enhanced tropism for endothelium may offer opportunities for the design of new strategies for modulation of endothelial function. Such strategies may be useful in the treatment of chronic diseases such as hypertension, atherosclerosis, and ischemic artery disease, as well as in acute myocardial infarction and during open heart surgery for prevention of ischemia and reperfusion (I/R)-induced injury. The recent identification of putative endothelial progenitor cells in peripheral blood may allow the design of autologous cell-based strategies for neovascularization of ischemic tissues and for the repair of injured blood vessels and bioengineering of vascular prosthesis. "Proof-of-concept" for some of these strategies has been established in animal models of cardiovascular disease. However the successful translation of these novel strategies into clinical application will require further developments in vector and delivery technologies. Further characterization of the processes involved in mobilization, migration, homing, and incorporation of endothelial progenitor cells into the target tissues is necessary, and the optimal conditions for therapeutic application of these cells need to be defined and standardized.
Endothelial dysfunction plays a pivotal role in cardiovascular disease. The recent isolation of endothelial progenitor cells together with the availability of promoter sequences and vectors capable of rendering endothelial-specific transgene expression may offer opportunities for the design of novel therapeutic strategies for improvement of endothelial function in cardiovascular disease.
Key Words: endothelial progenitor cells • endothelial-specific expression • gene therapy • targeting • viral vectors
|
Introduction |
|---|
The vascular endothelium (VE) plays a pivotal role in the regulation of vascular function and homeostasis.1 In normal conditions, the VE elaborates a variety of substances that influence vascular tone and protect the vessel wall against inflammatory cell adhesion, thrombus formation, and vascular cell proliferation.2–4 Pathological conditions caused by increased oxidative stress, hyperlipidemia, and inflammation lead to endothelial dysfunction, which is characterized by reduced availability of vasodilatory and anti-adhesion substances, such as nitric oxide (NO) and prostacyclin, and concomitant increases in vasoconstrictor and pro-adhesion factors such as endothelin-1, angiotensin II, and thromboxanes4 (Figure 1). These changes lead to increased vascular tone, inflammatory cell and platelet adhesion, and proliferation of the media smooth muscle, which increase the occurrence of thrombosis and vascular occlusion.3,4
|
Because of its central role in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease, the endothelium is an attractive therapeutic target for cardiovascular disease.5 Genetic modulation of endothelial function may offer new opportunities to modify the course of common cardiovascular diseases such as hypertension, atherosclerosis, thrombosis, and ischemic artery disease, whereas the availability of endothelial progenitor cells (EPC)6 may allow the design of cell-based strategies for rescue of ischemic tissue and repair and bioengineering of damaged vessels and prosthetic grafts.7–9 The feasibility and therapeutic potential of some of these novel strategies have been demonstrated in animal models of cardiovascular disease. However, the clinical application of these experimental therapies will require further development of vectors and delivery tools to improve specificity, safety, and efficiency of transfer of therapeutic substrates.
In this article, we review the major advances in gene-based and cell-based therapies for improvement of endothelial function in cardiovascular disease. We discuss strategies for selective delivery of genetic material to VE and identify potential targets for genetic modulation of endothelial function. In addition, we discuss the therapeutic potential of EPC in treatment of tissue ischemia and in repair and bioengineering of injured blood vessels and vascular prostheses.
|
Strategies for Genetic Manipulation of the Endothelium |
|---|
The archetypical somatic gene therapy strategy for cardiovascular disease involves the exogenous transfer and overexpression of a deficient or undercompensating gene to restore normal function or reverse disease progression.10 In this setting, a full-length or partial cDNA encoding the deficient gene is delivered to the target tissues using a vector system capable of expressing the therapeutic protein (Figure 2). The therapeutic gene may encode an intracellular protein, in which case the therapeutic effect is predominantly autocrine. Alternatively, the therapeutic protein may be secreted by transduced cells and exert physiological effects in a paracrine or endocrine fashion. Such "gain-of-function" strategies have been used for the overexpression of cytoprotective genes in animal models of vascular and myocardial disease, and in patients with ischemic coronary artery disease.10,11
|
In some instances, the short-term inhibition (loss-of-function) of pathogenic genes may be desirable. Acute inhibition of transcription and translation can be achieved by treatment with short single-stranded antisense oligodeoxynucleotides, ribozymes, and, more recently, using RNA interference technology12–15 (Figure 2). These molecules inhibit the synthesis of proteins by hybridizing in a sequence-specific fashion to the target mRNA. Double-stranded "decoy" oligonucleotides bearing DNA consensus binding sequences (cis-elements) have been used to inhibit the transactivating activity of target transcription factors16 (Figure 2). The decoy is delivered in molar excess, effectively sequestering the target transcription factor and rendering it incapable of binding to the promoter region of the target gene(s). A major limitation of this strategy is the lack of specificity, because several genes may be under the control of the targeted transcription factor. Furthermore, the target gene may be under the influence of multiple transcription factors. New strategies are currently being developed to improve the specificity of gene knockdown. For example, nucleic acid and peptide aptamers have been used to inhibit protein function without altering the genetic complement of the host.17
|
Endothelial Cell-Specific Targeting |
|---|
Gene transfer protocols for the cardiovascular system have used predominantly constitutive vectors with broad tropism for many tissues.11 However, nonspecific vectors may lead to widespread systemic distribution and ectopic transgene expression. These problems could potentially be circumvented by using tissue or cell-specific vectors capable of selectively delivering and expressing the genetic material at the target sites.
Two approaches have been used to target transgene expression to the endothelium. One strategy uses promoter/enhancer sequences from endothelium-restricted genes to drive the expression of transgenes by the gene transfer vectors.18 Adenoviral (Ad) vectors incorporating promoter sequences derived from fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (Flt-1, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 [VEGFR-1]), the intracellular cell adhesion molecule (ICAM-2), or von Willebrand factor (vWF) have been reported to express the reporter gene lacZ in endothelial cells in vitro and in vivo with varying degrees of specificity and intensity. Flt-1 and ICAM-2 promoter-driven vectors yield transgene expression levels that are comparable to cytomegalovirus promoter-driven vectors in cultured human umbilical endothelial cells, whereas expression by the vWF promoter is very low.18 Flt-1-driven vectors showed the highest degree of endothelial specificity of transgene expression after ex vivo transduction of intact human vein or after systemic administration.18 Others have reported endothelial cell-specific reporter gene expression after replacement of native enhancer sequences in murine leukemia retrovirus long terminal repeat with regulatory sequences from the human promoters of preproendothelin-1, E-selectin, ICAM-2, Flt-1, kinase domain region (flk-1), or vWF.19–21 Vectors containing the endoglin promoter express high levels of transgene in the endothelium after systemic or local delivery,22 whereas expression of the thrombomodulin gene by adeno-associated virus (AAV) under regulation of the plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 promoter increases transgene expression 600- to 1000-fold compared with endogenous expression in endothelial cells.23 The endothelial specificity of many of these promoters has also been confirmed in genetic mouse models. Selective endothelial specific transgene expression is seen in transgenic mice expressing lacZ under the control of minimal promoters derived from Tie II (angiopoietin receptor), vWF, Flt-1, thrombomodulin, E-selectin, and ICAM-2.24–28
The other strategy used to achieve endothelium-specific transgene expression involves modification of vector properties to enhance their tropism for endothelium.29 Several modifications to vector backbones have been reported to increase endothelial tropism of viral vectors. An Ad vector harboring deletions to the E1 and E4 regulatory regions produced higher levels and increased the sustainability of the LacZ reporter transgene in VE than an Ad vector containing a single deletion in the E1 region 10 days after transfer to intact carotid arteries in rabbits.30 The enhanced expression by the dual-deleted vector was associated with reduced endothelial expression of adhesion molecules and decreased inflammation in the vessel wall.30 The ability of these dual-deleted vectors to attenuate endothelial cell activation relative to single-deleted vectors has been independently confirmed by Rafii et al in primary human umbilical vein endothelial cells in culture.31 Others have reported that insertion of endothelium-binding peptides into the adenovirus fiber protein32,33 or into the capsid of AAV34 inhibit the binding of the vector to their natural receptors, retargeting expression of the transgene selectively to the endothelium. This group has recently produced AAV vectors with capsids incorporating small homing peptides that specifically retarget viral uptake to venous endothelial cells after systemic delivery,35 suggesting that genetic modification of the capsid proteins may be a useful strategy to target vector delivery to specific regions of the vasculature. A potentially efficacious strategy for specific delivery of therapeutic genes to dysfunctional endothelial cells involves the use of vectors targeting the oxidized low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor-1. This receptor is exclusively expressed in endothelium36 and is strongly upregulated in dysfunctional endothelial cells in hypertension and atherosclerosis.37 Several peptides have been isolated from a phage library that show selectivity for oxidized LDL receptor-1.38 Thus, the incorporation of these peptides into the capsid of Ad or AAV vectors may provide a strategy to retarget the vectors to deliver therapeutic genes selectively to the dysfunctional endothelium.38 Another strategy that has been used for targeting transgene expression to the endothelium uses bispecific antibodies conjugated to endothelium-specific homing peptides (adapters) that simultaneously neutralize the native tropism of the viral vector while enhancing the binding capacity of the virus to endothelium.39,40
|
Regulated Endothelial Cell-Specific Transgene Expression |
|---|
In addition to endothelial-specific retargeting of vectors, various strategies have been developed for regulation of transgene expression. Regulatory sequences that are sensitive to local physiological changes such as hypoxia, inflammation, or increased shear-stress render transgene expression responsive to these endogenous stimuli.41,42 The combination of a tissue-specific promoter and physiologically regulated enhancer elements in a single expression vector provides spatial and temporal control of transgene expression and may be the ideal strategy to achieve maximal therapeutic efficacy. The feasibility of such a combinatorial approach has been partially validated. Transient transfection of endothelial cells derived from endothelioma with retroviral vectors incorporating hypoxia responsive elements and endothelial-specific enhancer sequences derived from the Flk-1 promoter were reported to increase endothelial-specific expression of a luciferase reporter gene several fold on exposure to hypoxia,41 whereas incorporation of a shear stress responsive element increased expression of reporter gene in response to shear-stress in cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells and after intravascular administration to stenotic rabbit arteries.42
|
Tools for Genetic Manipulation of the Endothelium |
|---|
Vectors
Gene transfer efficiency is influenced by the type of vector, the route of delivery, the permissiveness of the target tissue to the vector, and the dosage and volume of delivery of the genetic material.11,43 The main vector systems currently used for gene transfer are summarized in online Table I, available at http://atvb.ahajournals.org). Nonviral vectors include naked plasmids, cationic liposome and hybrid viral-liposome formulations, synthetic peptides, and several physical methods. These vectors usually yield low gene transfer efficiency because of lack of genomic integration and rapid degradation of the vector.44,45 The efficiency of plasmid gene transfer can be improved by encapsulating the plasmid in neutral liposomes fused to the viral coat of the Sendai virus (hemagglutinating virus of Japan)46 or by conjugating it to cationic liposomes,47 but transgene expression remains highly transient because the complexes are rapidly degraded by lysosomal enzymes. Application of nondistending pressure in an enclosed environment has been used to deliver oligonucleotides ex vivo to vein grafts,48 highlighting a potential application of this technique for genetic engineering of blood vessels in preparation for transplantation. Recently, we reported enhancement of gene transfer to the carotid artery in rabbits by applying focused ultrasound at the time of intraluminal gene delivery.49 A promising new delivery technology uses synthetic peptide carriers containing a nuclear localization signal to facilitate nuclear uptake of the target cDNA.50 These peptide-DNA heteroplexes are recognized by intracellular receptor proteins and imported into the nucleus, where the target cDNA is transcribed.
Adenoviruses of serotype 2 or 5 are the most widely used viral vectors.51,52 These viruses can transduce both dividing and terminally differentiated vascular cell types and can accommodate large (up to 7.5 Kb) DNA inserts.52 Efficiencies of endothelial cell transduction by adenovirus varying between 30% and >90% have been reported by different groups in intact vessels (online Table I);53–55 however, efficiencies in the 30% to 50% range are more commonly reported.55 Modifications of the vector backbone, such as the incorporation of motifs that recognize matrix metalloproteinases or modification of the capsid proteins to incorporate homing peptides, have been shown to improve the efficiency and specificity of endothelial Ad uptake.32,33,56 Another approach uses chimeric Ad vectors incorporating fiber proteins from different serotypes. For example, Havenga et al reported that adenovirus serotype 5 carrying the fiber protein of adenovirus serotype 16 (Ad5.Fib16) expressed higher levels of transgene expression in endothelial cells from different origins and from different species.57 The problems most commonly encountered with the use of adenovirus are the cytotoxicity associated with induction of the immune response, the rapid loss of transgene expression caused by episomal localization of the viral genomes, and widespread systemic biodistribution after intravascular delivery.53,58,59 However, Steg et al60 reported low levels of extra-arterial transgene expression after percutaneous delivery of Ad vector. Another concern is that local Ad delivery may upregulate the expression of adhesion molecules in the vessel wall and lead to neointima deposition.61,62 A new generation of "gutted" Ad vectors has been developed in which the host inflammatory response is attenuated by removing all of the Ad coding sequences.63
AAV has emerged as the vector of choice in several gene therapy application because of its low immunogenicity64,65 and ability to stably transduce terminally differentiated cells.64 The vector transduces endothelial cells in culture23,34,66,67 an in vivo68–70 with low efficiency. Transduction efficiency of endothelium in vivo by AAV is typically between 2% and 5%.68–70 However, the low efficiency of transduction is partially offset by prolonged transgene expression. For example, transgene expression was observed in carotid arteries of mouse up to 1 year after gene transfer.70 Pajusola et al68 investigated the possible reasons for the low infectivity of endothelium by AAV2. The authors showed marked accumulation of heparan sulfate proteoglycans in the extracellular matrix of endothelial cells. Because heparan sulfate is a component of the putative AAV receptor,63 the authors suggest that the low transduction efficiency of endothelial cells may be caused by sequestration of the virus in the extracellular matrix. As is the case with Ad vectors, the efficiency and specificity of endothelial cell transduction by AAV has been reported to be enhanced by incorporating homing peptides into the capsid of the virus.34,35 The major limitation of the AAV vector has been its inability to accommodate DNA inserts larger than 4 Kb.63 However trans-splicing between 2 separate AAV vectors has been used successfully as a strategy for delivery of genes >4 Kb.71 Scalability of AAV and production of adequate viral titers have also been major technical limitations.63 Recent improvements in vector production have yielded highly pure preparations of AAV that are suitable for gene transfer in humans,72,73 and new serotypes with improved tropism for many different tissues are currently being evaluated.74 The vector has been recently used in several clinical trials for hemophilia75 and cystic fibrosis.76 Systemic distribution and ectopic transgene expression can also occur after local AAV delivery.63,77
RNA-based retroviral vectors have not found widespread application in in vivo vascular gene transfer protocols.78 These single-stranded vectors enter the host cells by binding to a cell-surface receptor via its capsid envelope proteins, which mediate adhesion to the cell membrane.78 On entry, the viral genome is converted to double-stranded DNA by reverse-transcriptase and integrates into the host genome leading to the possibility of stable long-term transgene expression.78 However, retroviral integration requires cell division, rendering these vectors inefficient for transduction of quiescent cells, such as normal endothelium.78,79 Furthermore, retrovirally delivered transgenes are prone to transcription silencing, which may shorten the duration of transgene expression.80 In addition, the random integration of the viral DNA into the host genome poses a potential risk of oncogeneses.79 Production of high-titer retrovirus preparations is difficult, but recent improvements in packaging systems, such as the use of pseudotype viral coats incorporating the vesicular stomatitis virus G-protein, have greatly improved the stability of the viral particles and have allowed transduction of a wider spectrum of cell types with relatively high efficiency.79 Nevertheless, retroviral vectors have been used extensively for ex vivo genetic modification of proliferating endothelial cells and EPC for subsequent implantation in vivo.9,81–84 Most of the retroviral vectors in current use are derived form Moloney murine leukemia virus. These vectors infect cultured endothelial cells from different sources with moderate efficiency (online Table I).81–84 Recently, we showed that pseudotype retroviral vectors derived from murine stem cell virus originally developed by Hawley et al85 transduce EPC with very high efficiency.9,86 Furthermore, we observed transgene expression in vivo up to 1 month after transplantation of the cells in injured blood vessels, suggesting that this vector may be suitable for genetic modification and long-term expression of therapeutic genes by EPC in vivo. The effects of retroviral infection on endothelial cell phenotype are controversial. Whereas Baer et al87 showed inhibition of proliferation of late passage canine endothelial cells in culture and reduced endothelialization of thoracoabdominal polytetrafluorethylene (pTFE) grafts after transduction of the cells with a BAG retroviral vector expressing Lac Z, Jankowski et al88 did not find any effect of transduction with an murine leukemia virus retrovirus on expression of adhesion or prothrombotic substances in endothelial cells in culture or after transplantation into Dacron grafts. Similarly, Inaba et al89 did not find any effect of transduction with an MFG.nls.LacZ retroviral vector on endothelial cell activation or growth in vitro. It is possible that different retrovirus strains influence endothelial cell phenotype differentially.
Lentiviruses are relative newcomers in cardiovascular gene therapy.90 In contrast to the oncoretroviruses, these human immunodeficiency virus-1-related retroviruses can infect dividing and quiescent cells and provide long-term expression of the therapeutic gene. The ability of lentivirus to transduce nondividing cells should favor their use for gene transfer to normal endothelium, which consists predominantly of quiescent cells. These vectors transduce progenitor and adult endothelial cells in culture with moderate efficiency (online Table I).91–93 However, the efficiency of these vectors for in vivo gene transfer to the endothelium has not been fully established. Recently, Bainbridge et al94 reported sustained expression of reporter gene in corneal endothelium after subretinal injection of a lentiviral vector expressing GFP, but the ability of these vectors to transduce endothelium in other vascular beds has not been documented.
Other viral vectors such as herpes simplex virus (HSV) and alpha viruses have had limited application in gene transfer to the endothelium52 HSV-based vectors can accommodate large DNA fragments, which is advantageous for the transfer of large or multiple genes.52 The virus has been reported to transduce efficiently all layers of the vascular wall in intact rabbit carotid arteries up to 4 weeks with minimal cytotoxicity.95,96 An interesting feature of HSV vector is the presence of the thymidine kinase gene, which renders the vector sensitive to antiviral drugs such as ganciclovir. Treatment with ganciclovir eradicates viral activity and kills the host cells.52 This property of HSV allows the expression of the transgene to be terminated at will. This strategy, commonly known as suicide gene therapy, may have potential applications in controlling vascular smooth muscle replication in injured vessels to reduce neointima deposition or as an antitumoricidal strategy to inhibit endothelial cell proliferation and angiogenesis in developing tumors.95,96 The positive strand RNA alpha viruses based on the Semliki Forest and Sendibis virus are capable of expressing transgenes within 24 hours of transduction with minimal cytoxicity.52 However, the usefulness of this vector for endothelial specific transgene targeting is limited at the present time because of poor transduction efficiency.97
Autologous and nonautologous endothelial cells have also been used as vehicles for delivery of therapeutic genes in injured vessels, stents, and prosthetic grafts,86,98–102 and in ischemic tissues.102 We have reported that autologous EPC can be efficiently transduced ex vivo with viral vectors expressing cytoprotective genes and subsequently used for rapid re-endothelialization of injured blood vessels.9,86 Others have successfully implanted genetically modified endothelial cells in vascular grafts and stents to form a biosurface with enhanced antithrombotic and antiproliferative properties.99–101 Recently, Iwaguro et al showed that genetic modification of EPC with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) increases the pro-angiogenic capacity of these cells several fold after transplantation into ischemic hind limb.102
Routes and Devices for Gene Transfer to the Endothelium
The anatomic localization of the VE renders it easily accessible for gene transfer by intraluminal delivery.55,103,104 Local gene delivery to the vessel wall has been achieved by infusing the vector into surgically isolated artery segments with polyethylene catheters.53,55,103 The vector solution is then allowed to "dwell" in the isolated segment for a specified amount of time, at the end of which the solution is withdrawn from the vessel. With appropriate adjustments to vector dose and incubation time, endothelial-specific transgene delivery can be achieved via this route. Using the "dwell" approach, Schulick et al53 showed that intraluminal delivery of 4x1010 pfu/mL of an adenovirus expressing LacZ to intact rat common carotid artery in vivo leads to efficient (>30%) endothelium-specific expression of transgene 3 days after gene transfer with minimal cytotoxicity. Higher doses of virus were reported to lead to significant endothelial injury and neointima hyperplasia.53
The "dwell" method of intraluminal gene delivery presents the advantage of minimizing systemic distribution of the vector. However, the method is invasive and usually requires prolonged incubation periods, during which the vessel segment is rendered ischemic.103 Various types of catheters have been developed over the years for local percutaneous delivery to the vessel wall. Double balloon catheters were used initially and reported to deliver genes to the endothelium with a moderate level of specificity.55,60,104,105 However, vector delivery with these catheters occurs slowly by passive diffusion and requires inflation of the balloon, which may cause ischemia and endothelial injury.55 Furthermore, the potential escape and systemic distribution of the vector via side branches cannot be prevented. Improved balloon catheters have subsequently been developed, which allow simultaneous delivery of the vector and perfusion of the vessel. The Dispatch catheter is a sophisticated autoperfusion catheter variant of the balloon catheter that allows local delivery at multiple infusion sites without impairing distal perfusion of the arterial bed.106 This catheter has been used for gene delivery to the endothelium with moderate efficiency in normal and atherosclerotic vessels.106 Other specialized catheters such as hydrogel-coated and channeled balloon catheters are inefficient for endothelial gene delivery,55,60 but are suitable for gene delivery to the media.55,103 A novel approach for vascular gene delivery uses coated stents seeded with genetically engineered endothelial cells or with antibody-tethered viral vectors.106–109 This strategy may be useful for local delivery of antiproliferative and antithrombotic genes to atherosclerotic arteries or vein grafts after percutaneous angioplasty or surgical revascularization.
|
Therapeutic Potential of Endothelium-Targeted Genetic Manipulation |
|---|
Despite the relative ease of delivering genes to endothelium, very few studies have considered endothelial-specific transgene expression as a therapeutic modality for cardiovascular disease. This seems paradoxical, considering the prominent role of endothelial dysfunction in cardiovascular disease and the potential therapeutic value of genetic modulation of endothelial function.5 A number of genes could serve as targets for genetic modulation of endothelial function (online Table II). In normal conditions, NO exerts multiple effects that are essential for maintenance of vessel wall homeostasis.110 These include vasodilation, inhibition of vascular smooth muscle proliferation and migration, and downregulation of inflammatory and adhesion molecules. Risk factors for cardiovascular disease induce oxidative stress, which plays a major role in endothelial dysfunction.111,112 Reactive oxygen species accelerate the catabolism of NO and activate redox-sensitive transcription factors such as NF-
B, which upregulate the transcription of various pro-inflammatory genes, chemokines, adhesion molecules, and pro-thrombotic factors in the endothelium (Figure 1).113–115 The activated endothelial cells produce excessive amounts of reactive oxygen species and adhesion molecules, resulting in increased vascular tone, microvascular dysfunction, and enhanced leukocyte adhesion. Thus reduced NO bioactivity provides a link between oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, and the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease (Figure 1), and therapeutic strategies aimed at reducing oxidative stress should increase NO bioavailability and help improve endothelial function in cardiovascular disease. In this regard, endothelium-targeted overexpression of anti-oxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, or heme oxygenase may provide a strategy to scavenge excess reactive oxygen species and reduce tissue injury in conditions associated with high oxidative stress such as hypertension, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease (online Table II).112 The overexpression of vasodilatory and antiproliferative genes such as nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and atrial peptides in the endothelium and/or the inhibition of endothelium-derived vasoconstrictors may be effective in the treatment of hypertension and vascular proliferative disease, whereas the expression of antithrombotic, anti-adhesion, or anti-inflammatory genes may be useful in prevention of plaque rupture, thrombosis, and acute myocardial infarction (MI) (online Table II). The overexpression of NOS in the endothelium by exogenous gene transfer may be particularly suitable for vascular diseases,116 given the broad vasculoprotective effects of NO.110
Although endothelium-targeted overexpression of thrombolytic genes is currently not possible as treatment for acute MI, the inhibition of endothelial cell activation using gene knockdown approaches may be useful as a strategy to downregulate the activity of pro-inflammatory cytokines and cell adhesion molecules triggered by ischemia and reperfusion injury (I/R) (online Table III).117 This may be useful as adjunctive therapy in MI patients after treatment with thrombolytic drugs, and in cardiac transplantation.117,118 A potential strategy for myocardial protection in these situations involves the inhibition of endothelial NF-B transactivation.118 This transcription factor plays a central role in endothelial cell activation in MI.119 Morishita et al120 showed that coronary retroinfusion of a "decoy" oligonucleotide bearing the consensus binding sequence for NF-B before coronary artery ligation markedly reduced infarct size by inhibiting pro-inflammatory and cell adhesion molecule expression. The authors observed significant nuclear uptake of the oligonucleotide by the coronary microvascular endothelial cells, suggesting that the cardioprotective effect of NF-B inhibition may be caused by inhibition of endothelial cell activation. Similarly, Suzuki et al121 reported that intraluminal delivery of NF-B decoy inhibited acute rejection and prolonged survival of heterotopically transplanted murine cardiac allografts in association with reduced myocardial inflammatory cell infiltration.
Endothelium-targeted genetic manipulation may also be useful for the rescue of ischemic tissues and injured blood vessels (online Table III).10,11,122 Therapeutic angiogenesis by exogenous supplementation of pro-angiogenic factors such as VEGF and fibroblast growth factor has been proposed as a potential option for treatment of ischemia, particularly in patients for whom percutaneous angioplasty or surgical revascularization has been excluded.11,123,124 However, several issues remain unresolved regarding the safety and the therapeutic efficacy of angiogenic gene transfer.125 Endothelial gene delivery may also be useful as a strategy to promote rapid endothelial recovery in blood vessels injured during revascularization procedures.122
|
EPC |
|---|
Several groups have reported the identification and isolation of EPC from adult peripheral blood.6,126 The cells are thought to originate from a common hemangioblast precursor in the bone marrow6,127 and express endothelial lineage markers such as CD34, Flk-1, VE-cadherin, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule (PECAM)-1 (CD31), vWF, eNOS, and E-selectin.6,127,128 The cells have high proliferative potential,6 and under specific growth conditions differentiate into mature endothelial cells that can be expanded in culture.6,7,130–134 The relative abundance of circulating EPC is low in basal conditions.6,129 However, the number of circulating cells increases several fold after exogenous stimulation with cytokines such as VEGF and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF).7,92,124,129,134–136 The mechanisms governing the mobilization, homing, and differentiation of the EPC in vivo remain largely unknown. The cells appear to be recruited predominantly to sites of injury such as ischemic myocardium and damaged blood vessels, 129,131,134,137 suggesting that signals emanating from the injury site may play a central role in the mobilization, homing, and differentiation processes. Injured tissues release various cytokines, chemokines, adhesion molecules, and extracellular matrix proteins locally, which may act in concert to mediate these processes.138–140,141 At the site of injury, the production of adhesion molecules may provide a microenvironment for implantation and subsequent proliferation and differentiation of the EPC.
We developed a streamlined method for isolation, cultivation, and expansion of EPC from peripheral blood based on density centrifugation and selective adherence to fibronectin-coated plastic dishes (Figure 3).9 The unfractionated mononuclear fraction is cultivated in media that favors endothelial cell differentiation (Figure 3A). Within days of plating, colonies of adherent cells proliferate rapidly to form a monolayer with the cobblestone morphology typical of endothelium (Figure 3B). After 2 weeks in culture, the cells adopt endothelial-like characteristics such as expression of vWF (Figure 3C), uptake of acetylated LDL (Figure 3D), and the ability to assemble into vascular tube-like structures (Figure 3E). The cells are highly amenable to genetic modification using retroviral vectors expressing exogenous genes (Figure 3F) rendering them ideal for gene transfer. Using this approach, we were able to expand these cells to yield sufficient number for autologous transplantation onto injured blood vessels and prosthetic grafts in rabbits.9,86,142
|
|
Endothelial Cell Therapy for Myocardial and Peripheral Ischemic Disease |
|---|
EPC may be useful as a cellular substrate for the formation of new vessels in ischemic tissues.143 Cell-based neovascularization of ischemic tissues has been achieved by directly injecting cells derived from the mononuclear fraction of bone marrow (BM-MNC) or peripheral blood (PB-MNC) into the ischemic region, or by mobilizing mononuclear cells from the bone marrow with cytokines and chemokines such as VEGF, G-CSF, and SDF-1.129,143 In the first case, the mononuclear cell fraction is isolated by density centrifugation and then injected whole, submitted to further selection using cell-surface markers presumed to be indicative of endothelial lineage (ie, Flk-1, E-selectin), or cultured and expanded ex vivo under growth conditions that promote endothelial cell differentiation.6,102,127,129,130,132 The cells are used for transplantation without any further manipulation, or they may be genetically modified with vectors expressing therapeutic genes9,86,102 and then delivered to the target area, where they may implant and promote new vessel growth (Figure 3).7,143
The use of this approach has been evaluated in several animal models of myocardial131,132,134,137,144–148 and limb102,130,133,149 ischemia. For example, transplantation of autologous CD31+ EPC from peripheral blood induced new vessel formation and improved left ventricular perfusion and function in pig hearts rendered ischemic by placement of an amaroid constrictor in the circumflex coronary artery, 144 whereas implantation of whole129 or CD34+-selected144 human peripheral mononuclear cells into nude rats immediately after acute MI led to revascularization of the infarcted myocardium, resulting in reduced interstitial fibrosis and improved left ventricular function. Evidence of neovascularization has also been seen with BM-MNC. Kocher et al134 reported that intravenous delivery of human CD34+ BM-MNC-derived angioblasts to nude rats with MI led to neovascularization of the infarcted myocardium, resulting in reduced apoptosis of myocytes in the peri-infarct region, decreased interstitial fibrosis, and sustained improvement in left ventricular function. In rats with limb ischemia, local intramuscular delivery of autologous BM-MN restored blood flow and exercise capacity, apparently caused by new vessel formation in the ischemic muscle,123 and injection of human BM-MNC or PB-MNC into nude rats149,150 and athymic mice102,130 induced angiogenesis in the ischemic limb, leading to improved perfusion and reduced incidence of autoamputation.
Mobilization of bone marrow has been used to increase the number of EPC homing to ischemic tissues to facilitate new vessel formation. In athymic nude mice with hind limb ischemia, local injection of SDF-1 stimulated homing of human PB-MNC administered systemically to the ischemic muscle and stimulated vasculogenesis.151 In patients with critical limb ischemia, VEGF gene transfer resulted in significant angiogenesis in the ischemic muscle in association with increased number of circulating EPC.132 Recently, several groups reported that statin therapy increases the number of EPC in patients with stable CAD,152,153 suggesting that the beneficial therapeutic effect of these drugs may be mediated, in part, via mobilization of EPC and subsequent neovascularization of ischemic myocardium.
|
Endothelial Cell Therapy for Vascular Repair and Bioengineering of Grafts and Artificial Vessels |
|---|
A developing field in vascular therapeutics is the use of autologous EPC transplantation for repair of damaged vessels and bioengineering of vascular prosthetic grafts and stents.81–84,86,98,154–156 We have recently reported that transplantation of autologous EPC into balloon-injured rabbit carotid arteries leads to nearly complete re-endothelialization of the denuded vessels as early as 4 days after cell transplantation (Figure 4A and 4B).9 In contrast, little evidence of re-endothelialization was seen at this time in the untreated vessels (Figure 4C and 4D). The rapid endothelial recovery of the treated vessels was followed by marked reduction in neointima hyperplasia, whereas a prominent neointima was present in the untreated vessel 4 weeks after the injury. We have subsequently shown that genetic modification with a retroviral vector expressing endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) potentiates the therapeutic effect of the transplanted cells, presumably by enhancing the vasculoprotective properties of the endothelium (Figure 5).86 We proposed that the transplantation of autologous EPC expressing vasculoprotective genes at the time of angioplasty may be useful as a strategy to prevent postintervention complications such as thrombosis and restenosis after revascularization procedures.
|
|
More recently, we reported that mobilization of EPC in rats by exogenous administration of G-CSF for several days before balloon injury of carotid artery leads to accelerated re-endothelialization of the denuded vessels (Figure 6A)142 In contrast, little re-endothelialization was seen at this time in injured vessels from untreated animals (Figure 6B). The vessels from the treated animals showed a decrease in neointima formation (Figure 6C), whereas a prominent neointima was present in the vessels from the untreated animals (Figure 6D). This may represent a novel noninvasive strategy for prevention of restenosis after balloon angioplasty, and the emphasis on pretreatment represents a paradigm shift in the treatment of restenosis, focusing on prevention rather than rescue. Others have reported evidence that statin therapy157,158 and estrogen159 increases the number of PB-EPC and reduces neointima hyperplasia in animal models of arterial injury. Interestingly, Assmus et al160 showed that statins reduce senescence and stimulate proliferation of PB-EPC by regulating the activity of crucial cell cycle genes such as the cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors. These findings suggest that the therapeutic potential of EPC could potentially be harnessed by noninvasive pharmacological manipulation and used to accelerate the endogenous repair mechanisms for inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia and prevention of restenosis after revascularization procedures. The simplicity and cost-effectiveness of this approach are major advantages compared with the stent and drug therapies currently in use. However, the long-term outcomes of these strategies and their safety for use in patients have not been established.
|
We9 and several other groups81–83,154,155,161–163 have also shown the suitability of EPC for the seeding of prosthetic grafts and stents. Seeding of autologous EPC into ePTFE segments led to rapid endothelialization of the graft segments after carotid interpositional grafting.9 Furthermore, the cells remained attached to lumen of the graft for at least 4 weeks after transplantation. Using a similar approach, Kaushal et al8 showed that seeding of EPC into decellularized porcine iliac vessels implanted as coronary interposition grafts formed a functional endothelial layer and improved vasodilatory function and patency of the grafts, and Dicheck et al82 reported that retrovirally transduced sheep endothelial cells overexpressing tissue-type plasminogen activator remained attached to stainless steel intravascular stents after balloon inflation in vitro. These authors have subsequently demonstrated that the seeded endothelial cells remain attached to the surface of the stent when exposed to pulsatile flow in vitro.164 Others have shown that delivery of pro-angiogenic cytokine VEGF accelerates endothelialization of stents after deployment in balloon-injured arteries165 Although these strategies have not been evaluated in humans, these findings imply that seeding of stents before implantation with genetically modified EPC may be useful for prevention of in-stent restenosis and thrombosis. Mobilization of EPC with cytokines has also been shown to be effective in promoting in vivo endothelialization of prosthetic grafts. Bhattacharya et al166 and Shi et al167 reported that mobilization of bone marrow by exogenous G-CSF enhances endothelialization and patency of small caliber prosthetic grafts implanted as carotid interposition grafts in association with an increase in the number of circulating EPC, suggesting that the mobilized cells are recruited to the site of grafting to participate in endothelialization of the graft.
|
Outstanding Issues With Cell-Based Therapy for Angiogenesis and Vascular Repair |
|---|
Despite the encouraging preclinical and clinical evidence demonstrating the potential of autologous EPCs in treatment of tissue ischemia and repair of injured blood vessels, the clinical application of these cells is limited by their scarcity in peripheral blood and difficulty in expanding sufficient number of cells for therapeutic application.6,143 Furthermore, EPC from patients with cardiovascular disease display varying degrees of functional impairment,143 and an inverse correlation has been reported between the number of circulating EPC and the prevalence of risk factors for CAD.168 These deficiencies may limit the therapeutic application of autologous EPC in these patients. Potential technical improvements to overcome these deficiencies may include isolation and expansion of EPC from an alternate source, such as bone marrow, or the use of allogenic EPC from chord blood.
Further characterization of the biology of EPC is also required. The nature of the mobilizing, migratory, and homing signals for EPC and the mechanisms of differentiation and incorporation into the target tissues have not been identified. Strategies for improved retention and survival of the transplanted cells need to be developed. A significant number of the transplanted cells may die soon after implantation, and EPC transplanted into denuded vessels and prosthetic grafts may detach and undergo rapid turnover.9 Strategies for improved cell adhesion and survival need to be devised. In this regard, Murasawa et al169 reported that overexpression of human telomerase reverse transcriptase enhances the proliferative and migratory capacity of EPC in response to VEGF stimulation, leading to improved neovascularization of ischemic limb. Controlled trials are necessary to define and standardize the conditions for therapeutic application of these cells with regards to the optimal time and method of delivery and the subpopulation and number of cells required to achieve a sustained therapeutic benefit, and multicenter randomized trials with sufficient power and representation will be essential to establish the therapeutic potential of EPC in treatment of ischemic and other vascular diseases.
|
Perspectives and Future Directions |
|---|
The role of VE in maintenance of cardiovascular homeostasis is now firmly established. Endothelial dysfunction is a prominent feature in cardiovascular disease. The recent development of gene transfer vectors with enhanced tropism for VE may provide the opportunity for the design of highly selective strategies for treatment of endothelial dysfunction in cardiovascular disease. Together with the availability of vectors capable of prolonged gene expression, one may envisage the development of therapeutic strategies that will provide sustained improvement of endothelial function with one single administration of the therapeutic agent. Such strategies would eliminate some of the problems encountered with drug therapies, namely tolerability and compliance. In addition, the availability of long-term expressing vectors may allow the design of strategies for prevention of endothelial dysfunction in patients at risk for cardiovascular disease. We believe that some of these strategies can be achieved with appropriate modifications to the current vector platforms. The future will likely see increased reliance on regulated endothelial-specific vectors that can adjust transgene expression to underlying pathophysiological changes in tissue oxygenation, inflammation, or shear-stress. The development of better vectors will need to go hand-in-hand with improvements in delivery devices and mapping techniques to increase efficacy and minimize injury during gene delivery.
The outlook for endothelial cell-based therapy for tissue ischemia and vascular repair is promising. However, several crucial issues need to be addressed. There is urgent need to standardize the protocols with respect to isolation and cultivation of the cells, the timing of administration, the optimal cell number and method of administration, and, more importantly, the safety of the approach. Strategies to improve the adherence and survival of the transplanted cells will be necessary to achieve sustained therapeutic effect. Large-scale randomized trials will be essential to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of endothelial cell therapy.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Dr Melo is Canada Research Chair in Molecular Cardiology and a New Investigator of the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada and is supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canadian Foundation of Innovation, and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Saskatchewan. Dr Dzau is supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health HL 35610, HL 058316, HL 072010, and HL 073219. Dr Pachori is the recipient of a NRSA postdoctoral fellowship from the National Institutes of Health. Dr Gnecchi was the recipient of a scholarship from the Italian Society of Cardiology and a research award from the University of Pavia and IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Received October 29, 2003; accepted July 30, 2004.
|
References |
|---|
1. Rubanyi GM. The role of endothelium in cardiovascular homeostasis and diseases. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1993; 22 (Suppl): S1–S4.
2. Quyyumi AA. Endothelial function in health and disease: New insights into the genesis of cardiovascular disease. Am J Med. 1998; 105 (1A): 32S–39S.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Drexler H, Hornig B. Endothelial dysfunction in human disease. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1999; 31: 51–60.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Cines DB, Pollak ES, Buck CA. Endothelial cells in physiology and in the pathophysiology of vascular disorders. Blood. 1998; 91: 3527–3561.
5. Cooke, JP. The endothelium: a new target for therapy. Vasc Med. 2000; 5: 49–53.
6. Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A, Silver M, van der Zee R, Li T, Witzenbichler B, Schatteman G, Isner JM. Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science. 1997; 275: 964–967.
7. Raffi S, Lyden D. Therapeutic stem and progenitor cell transplantation for organ vascularization and regeneration. Nat Med. 2003; 9: 702–712.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Kaushal S, Amiel GE, Guleserian KJ, Shapira OM, Perry T, Sutherland FW, Rabkin E, Moran AM, Schoen FJ, Atala A, Soker S, Bischoff J, Mayer JE Jr. Functional small-diameter neovessels created using endothelial progenitor cells expanded ex vivo. Nat Med. 2001; 7: 1035–1040.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Griese DP, Ehsan A, Melo LG, Kong D, Zhang L, Mann MJ, Pratt RE, Mulligan RC, Dzau VJ. Isolation and transplantation of autologous circulating endothelial cells into denuded vessels and prosthetic grafts: Implications for cell-based vascular therapy. Circulation. 2003; 108: 2710–2715.
10. Francis SC, Raizada MK, Mangi AA, Melo LG, Dzau VJ, Vale PR, Isner JM, Losordo DW, Chao J, Katovich MJ, Berecek KH. Genetic targeting for cardiovascular therapeutics: are we near the summit or just beginning the climb? Physiol Genomics. 2001; 7: 79–94.
11. Isner JM. Myocardial gene therapy. Nature. 2002; 415: 234–239.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Stein CA. The experimental use of antisense oligonucleotides: a guide for the perplexed. J Clin Invest. 2001; 108: 641–644.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Akhtar S, Hughes MD, Khan A, Bibby M, Hussain M, Nawaz Q, Double J, Sayyed P. The delivery of antisense therapeutics. Adv Drug Del Rev. 2000; 44: 3–21.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Doudna JA, Cech TR. The chemical repertoire of natural ribozymes. Nature. 2002; 418: 222–228.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Hannon GJ. RNA interference. Nature. 2002; 418: 244–251.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Mann MJ, Dzau VJ. Therapeutic applications of transcription factor decoy oligonucleotides. J Clin Invest. 2000; 106: 1071–1075.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. White RR, Sullenger BA, Rusconi CP. Developing aptamers into therapeutics. J Clin Invest. 2000; 106: 929–934.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Nicklin SA, Reynolds PN, Brosnan MJ, White SJ, Curiel DT, Dominiczak AF, Baker AH. Analysis of cell-specific promoters for viral gene therapy targeted at the vascular endothelium. Hypertension. 2001; 38: 65–70.
19. Jaggar RT, Chan HY, Harris AL, Bicknell R. Endothelial cell-specific expression of tumor necrosis factor-a from the KDR or E-selectin promoters following retroviral delivery. Human Gene Ther. 1997; 8: 2239–2247.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Mavria G, Jager U, Porter CD. Generation of a high titer retroviral vector for endothelial cell-specific gene expression in vivo. Gene Ther. 2000; 7: 368–376.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Richardson TB, Kaspers J, Porter CD. Retroviral hybrid LTR vector strategy: functional analysis of LTR elements and generation of endothelial cell specificity. Gene Ther. 2004; 10: 1–9.[CrossRef]
22. Velasco B, Ramirez JR, Relloso M, Li C, Kumar S, Lopez-Bote JP, Barriocanal FP, Lopez-Novoa JM, Cowan PJ, dÁpice AJF, Bernabeu C. Vascular gene transfer driven by endoglin and ICAM-2 endothelial-specific promoters. Gene Ther. 2001; 8: 897–904.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Mimuro J, Muramatsu S, Hakamada Y, Mori K, Kikuchi J, Urabe M, Madoiwa S, Ozawa K, Sakata Y. Recombinant adeno-associated virus vector transduced vascular endothelial cells express the thrombomodulin transgene under the regulation of enhanced plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 promoter. Gene Ther. 2001; 8: 1690–1697.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Schlaeger TM, Bartunkova S, Lawitts JA, Teichmann G, Risau W, Deutsch U, Sato TN. Uniform vascular endothelial-specific gene expression in both embryonic and adult transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94: 3058–3063.
25. Minami T, Donovan DJ, Tsai JC, Rosenberg RD, Aird WC. Differential regulation of the von Willebrandt factor and flt-1 promoters in the endothellium of hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase-targeted mice. Blood. 2002; 100: 4019–4025.
26. Aird WC, Jahroudi N, Weiler-Guettler H, Rayburn HB, Rosenberg RD. Human von Willebrand gene sequences target expression to a subpopulation of endothelial cells in transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995; 92: 4567–4571.
27. Weiler-Guettler H, Aird WC, Husain M, Rayburn H, Rosenberg RD. Targeting of transgene expression to the vascular endothelium of mice by homologous recombination at the thrombomodulin locus. Circ Res. 1996; 78: 180–187.
28. Cowan PJ, Shinkel TA, Witort EJ, Barlow H, Pearse MJ, d’Apice AJ. Targeting gene expression to endothelial cells in transgenic mice using the human intercellular adhesion molecule 2 promoter. Transplantation. 1996; 62: 155–160.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Nicklin SA, Baker AH. Tropism-modified adenoviral and adeno-associated viral vectors for gene therapy. Curr Gene Ther. 2002; 2: 273–293.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Qian HS, Channon K, Neplioueva V, Wang Q, Finer M, Tsui L, George SE, McArthur J. Improved adenoviral vector for vascular gene therapy: beneficial effects on vascular function and inflammation. Circ Res. 2001; 88: 911–917.
31. Rafii S, Dias S, Meeus S, Hattori K, Ramachandran R, Feuerback F, Worgall S, Hackett NR, Crystal RG. Infection of endothelium with E1(–)E4(+), but not E1(–)E4(–), adenovirus gene transfer vectors enhances leukocyte adhesion and migration by modulation of ICAM-1, VCAM-1, CD34, and chemokine expression. Circ Res. 2001; 88: 903–910.
32. Nicklin SA, Von Seggern DJ, Work LM, Pek DC, Dominiczak AF, Nemerow GR, Baker AH. Ablating adenovirus type 5 fiber-CAR binding and H1 loop insertion of the SIGYPLP peptide generate an endothelial cell selective adenovirus. Mol Ther. 2001; 4: 534–542.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Nicklin SA, White SJ, Von Seggern DJ, Baker AH. In vitro and in vivo characterization of endothelial cell selective adenoviral vectors. J Gene Med. 2004; 6: 300–308.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Nicklin SA, Buening H, Dishart KL, de Alwis M, Girod A, Hacker U, Thrasher AJ, Ali RR, Hallek M, Baker AH. Efficient and selective AAV2-mediated gene transfer directed to human vascular endothelial cells. Mol Ther. 2001; 4: 174–181.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. White SJ, Nicklin SA, Buning H, Brosnan J, Leike K, Papadakis ED, Hallek M, Baker AH. Targeted gene delivery to vascular tissue in vivo by tropism-modified adeno-associated virus vector. Circulation. 2004; 109: 513–519.
36. Sawamura T, Kume N, Aoyama T, Moriwaki H, Hoshikawa H, Aiba Y, Tanaka T, Miwa S, Katsura Y, Kita T, Masaki T. An endothelial receptor for oxidized low-density lipoprotein. Nature. 1997; 386: 73–77.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Kataoka H, Kume N, Mijsmoto S, Minami M, Moriwaki H, Murase T, Sawamura T, Hashimoto N, Kita T. Expression of lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor-1 in human atherosclerotic lesions. Circulation. 1999; 99: 3110–3117.
38. White SJ, Nicklin SA, Sawamura T, Baker AH. Identification of peptides that target the endothelial cell-specific LOX-1 receptor. Hypertension. 2001; 37 (part 2): 449–455.
39. Wickham TJ, Segal DM, Roelvink PW, Carrion ME, Lizonova A, Lee GM, Kovesdi I. Targeted adenovirus gene transfer to endothelial and smooth muscle cells by using bispecific antibodies. J Virol. 1996; 70: 6831–6838.
40. Trepel M, Grifman M, Weitzman MD, Pasqualini R. Molecular adapters for vascular-targeted adenoviral gene delivery. Hum Gene Ther. 11: 1971–1981.
41. Modich U, Pugh CW and Bicknell R. Increasing endothelial cell specific expression by the use of heterologous hypoxic and cytokine-inducible enhancers. Gene Ther. 2000; 7: 896–902.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Houston P, White BP, Campbell CJ, Braddock M. Delivery and expression of fluid shear stress-inducible promoters to the vessel wall: applications for cardiovascular gene therapy. Hum Gene Ther. 1999; 10: 3031–3044.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Huard J, Lochmuller H, Acsadi G, Jani A, Massie B, Karpati G. The route of administration is a major determinant of the transduction efficiency of rat tissues by adenoviral recombinant. Gene Ther. 1995; 2: 107–115.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Li S, Huang L. Nonviral gene therapy: promises and challenges. Gene Ther. 2000; 7: 31–34.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Niidome T, Huang L. Gene therapy progress and prospects: Non-viral vectors. Gene Ther. 2002; 9: 1647–1652.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Dzau VJ, Mann MJ, Morishita R, Kaneda Y. Fusigenic viral liposome for gene therapy in cardiovascular diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996; 93: 11421–11425.
47. Takeshita S, Gal D, Leclerc G, Pickering JG, Riessen R, Weir L, Isner JM. Increased gene expression after liposome-mediated arterial gene transfer associated with intimal smooth muscle cell proliferation. In vitro and in vivo findings. J Clin Invest. 1994; 93: 652–661.
48. Mann MJ, Gibbons GH, Hutchinson H, Poston RS, Hoyt EG, Robbins RC, Dzau VJ. Pressure-mediated oligonucleotide transfection of rat and human cardiovascular tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96: 6411–6416.
49. Huber PE, Mann MJ, Melo LG, Ehsan A, Kong D, Zhang L, Rezvani M, Peschke P, Jolesz F, Dzau VJ, Hynynen K. Focused ultrasound induces localized enhancement of reporter gene expression in rabbit carotid artery. Gen Ther. 2003; 10: 1600–1607.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Cartier R, Reszka R. Utilization of synthetic peptides containing nuclear localization signals for nonviral gene transfer. Gen Ther. 2002; 9: 157–167.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Robbins PD, Ghivizzani C. Viral vectors for gene therapy. Pharmacol Ther. 1998; 80: 35–47.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
52. Mah C, Byrne BJ, Flotte TR. Virus-based gene delivery systems. Clin Pharmacokin. 2002; 41: 901–911.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. Schulick AH, Dong G, Newman KD, Virmani R, Dicheck DA. Endothelium-specific in vivo gene transfer. Circ Res. 1995; 77: 475–485.
54. Lemarchand P, Jones M, Yamada I, Crystal RG. In vivo gene transfer and expression in normal uninjured vessels using replication-deficient recombinant adenovirus vectors. Circ Res. 1993; 72: 1132–1138.
55. Feldman LJ, Steg G. Optimal techniques for arterial gene transfer. Cardiovasc Res. 35: 391–404.
56. Turunen MP, Puhakka HL, Koponen JK, Hiltunen MO, Rutanen J, Leppanen O, Turunen AM, Narvanen A, Newby AC, Baker AH, Yla-Herttuala S. Peptide-retargeted adenovirus encoding a tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 decreases restenosis after intravascular gene transfer. Mol Ther. 2002; 6: 306–312.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
57. Havenga MJE, Lemckert AAC, Grimbergen JM, Vogels R, Huisman LGM, Valerio D, Bout A, Quax PHA. Improved adenovirus vectors for infection of cardiovascular tissues. J Virol. 2001; 75: 3335–3342.
58. Chen D, Murphy B, Sung R, Bromberg JS. Adaptive and innate immune responses to gene transfer vectors: Role of cytokines and chemokines in vector function. Gen Ther. 2003; 10: 991–998.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
59. Hiltunen MO, Turunen MP, Turunen AM, Rissanen TT, Laitinen M, Kosma VM, Yla-Herttuala S. Biodistribution of adenoviral vector to nontarget tissues after local in vivo gene transfer to arterial wall using intravascular and periadventitial gene delivery methods. FASEB J. 2000; M14: 2230–2236.
60. Steg PG, Feldman LJ, Scoazec JY, Tahlil O, Barry JJ, Boulechfar S, Ragot T, Isner JM, Perricaudet M. Arterial gene transfer to rabbit endothelial and smooth muscle cells using percutaneous delivery of an adenoviral vector. Circulation. 1994; 90: 1648–1656.
61. Newman KD, Dunn PF, Owens JW, Schulick AH, Virmani R, Sukkova G, Libby P, Dichek DA. Adenovirus-mediated gene transfer into normal rabbit arteries results in prolonged vascular cell activation, inflammation and neointima hyperplasia. J Clin Invest. 1995; 96: 2955–2965.
62. Channon KM, Qian HS, Youngblood SA, Olmez E, Shetty GA, Neplioueva V, Blazing MA, George SE. Acute host-mediated endothelial injury after adenoviral gene transfer in normal rabbit arteries: impact on transgene expression and endothelial function. Circ Res. 1998; 82: 1253–1262.
63. Hartigan-O’Connor D, Amalfitano A, Chamberlain JS. Improved production of gutted adenovirus in cells expressing adenovirus preterminal protein and DNA pokymerase. J Virol. 1999; 73: 7835–7841.
64. Monahan PE, Samulski RJ. Adeno-associated virus vectors for gene therapy: more pros than cons? Mol Med Today. 2000; 6: 433–440.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
65. Chirmule, N, Propert, K, Magosin, S, Qian R, Wilson J. Immune responses to adenovirus and adeno associated virus in humans. Gene Ther. 1999; 6: 1574–1583.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
66. Maeda Y, Ikeda U, Ogasawara Y, Urabe M, Takizawa T, Saito T, Colosi P, Kurtzman G, Shimada K, Ozawa K. Gene transfer into vascular cells using adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors. Cardiovasc Res. 1997; 35: 514–521.
67. Rolling F, Nong Z, Pisvin S, Collen D. Adeno-associated virus-mediated gene transfer into rat carotid arteries. Gene Ther. 1997; 4: 757–761.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
68. Pajusola K, Gruchala M, Joch H, Luscher TF, Herttuala SY, Bueler H. Cell type-specific characteristics modulate the transduction efficiency of adeno-associated virus type 2 and restrain infection of endothelial cells. J Virol. 2002; 76: 11530–11540.
69. Eslami MH, Gangadharan SP, Sui X, Rhynhart KK, Snyder RO, Conte MS. J Vasc Surg. 2000; 31: 1149–1159.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
70. Vassalli G, Bueler H, Dudler J, von Segesser LK, Kappenberger L. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors achieve prolonged expression in the mouse myocardium and arteries in vivo: a comparative study with adenovirus vectors. Int J Cardiol. 2003; 90: 229–238.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
71. Yan Z, Zhang Y, Duan D, Engelhardt JF. Trans-splicing vectors expand the utility of adeno-associated virus for gene therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97: 6716–6721.
72. Grimm D. Production methods for gene transfer vectors based on adeno-associated virus serotypes. Methods. 2002; 28: 146–157.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
73. Booth MJ, Mistry A, Li X, Thrasher A, Coffin RS. Transfection-free and scalable recombinant AAV vector production using HSV/AAV hybrids. Gene Ther. 2004; 11: 829–837.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
74. Gao, G-P, Alvira MR, Wang L. Novel adeno-associated viruses from rhesus monkeys as vectors for human gene therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99: 11854–11859.
75. Walsh CE. Gene therapy progress and prospects: Gene therapy for the hemophilias. Gene Ther. 2003; 10: 993–1003.
76. Griesenbach U, Ferrari S, Geddes DM, Alton EW. Gene therapy progress and prospects: Cystic fibrosis. Gene Ther. 2002; 9: 1344–1350.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
77. Pachori AS, Melo LG, Zhang L, Loda M, Pratt RE, Dzau VJ. Potential for germ line transmission after intramyocardial gene delivery by adeno-associated virus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004; 313: 528–533.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
78. Daly G, Chernajivski Y. Recent developments in retrovirally-mediated gene transduction. Mol Ther. 2000; 2: 423–434.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
79. Hu W-S, Pathak VK. Design of retroviral vectors and helper cells for gene therapy. Pharmacol Rev. 2000; 52: 493–511.
80. Pannell D, Ellis J. Silencing of gene expression: implications for design of retroviral vectors. Rev Med Virol. 2001; 11: 205–217.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
81. Wilson JM, Birinyi LK, Salomon RN, Libby P, Callow AD, Mulligan RC. Implantation of vascular grafts lined with genetically modified endothelial cells. Science. 1989; 244: 1344–1346.
82. Dichek DA, Neville RF, Zwiebel JA, Freeman SM, Leon MB, Anderson WF. Seeding of intravascular stents with genetically engineered endothelial cells. Circulation. 1989; 80: 1347–1353.
83. Eton D, Terramani TT, Wang Y, Takahashi AM, Nigro JJ, Tang L, Yu H. Genetic engineering of stent grafts with a highly efficient pseudotyped retroviral vector. J Vasc Surg. 1999; 29: 863–873.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
84. Conte MS, Birinyi LK, Miyata T, Fallon JT, Gold HK, Whittemore AD, Mulligan RC. Efficient repopulation of denuded rabbit arteries with autologous genetically modified endothelial cells. Circulation. 1994; 89: 2161–2169.
85. Hawley RG, Lieu FHL, Fong AZC, Hawley TS. Versatile retroviral vectors for potential use in gene therapy. Gene Ther. 1994; 1: 136–138.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
86. Kong D, Melo LG, Mangi AA, Zhang L, Lopez-Ilasaca M, Perrella MA, Liew CC, Pratt RE, Dzau VJ. Enhanced inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia by genetically engineered endothelial progenitor cells. Circulation. 2004; 109: 1769–1775.
87. Baer RP, Whitehill TE, Sarkar R, Sarkar M, Messina LM, Komorowski TA, Stanley JC. Retroviral-mediated transduction of endothelial cells in the lac Z gene impairs cellular proliferation in vitro and graft endothelialization in vivo. J Vasc Surg. 1996, 24; 892–899.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
88. Jankowski RJ, Severyn DA, Wagner WR. Effect of retroviral transduction on human endothelial cell phenotype and adhesion to Dacron vascular grafts. J Vasc Surg. 1997; 26: 676–684.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
89. Inaba M, Toninelli E, Vanmeter G, Bender JR, Conte MS. Retroviral gene transfer: Effects on endothelial cell phenotype. J. Surg. Res. 1998; 78: 31–36.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
90. Trono D. Lentiviral vectors: turning a deadly foe into a therapeutic agent. Gene Ther. 2000; 7: 20–23.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
91. Totsugawa T, Kobayashi N, Okitsu T, Noguchi H, Watanabe T, Matsumura T, Maruyama M, Fujiwara T, Sakaguchi M, Tanaka N. Lentiviral transfer of the lacZ gene into human endothelial cells and human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Transplant. 2002; 11: 481–488.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
92. Herder C, Tonn T, Oostendorp R, Beckrt S, Keller U, Peschel C, Grez M, Seifried E. Sustained expansion and transgene expression of coagulation factor VIII-transduced chord blood-derived endothelial progenitor cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23: 2266–2272.
93. Dishart KL, Denby L, George SJ, Nicklin SA, Yendluri S, Tuerk MJ, Kelley MP, Donahue BA, Newby AC, Harding T, Baker AH. Third-generation lentivirus effciently transduce and phenotypically modify vascular cells: implications for gene therapy. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2003; 35: 739–748.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
94. Bainbridge JW, Stephens C, Parsley K, Demaison C, Halfyard A, Thrasher AJ, Ali RR. In vivo gene transfer to the mouse eye using an HIV-based lentiviral vector; efficient long-term transduction of corneal endothelium and retinal pigment epithelium. Gene Ther. 2001; 8: 1665–1668.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
95. Skelly CL, Curi MA, Meyerson SL, Woo DH, Hari D, Vosicky JE, Advani SJ, Mauceri HJ, Glagov S, Roizman B, Weichselbaum RR, Schwartz LB. Prevention of restenosis by a herpes simplex virus mutant capable of controlled long-term expression in vascular tissue in vivo. Gene Ther. 2001; 8: 1840–1846.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
96. Fife K, Bower M, Cooper RG, Stewart L, Etheridge CJ, Coombes RC, Buluwela L, Miller AD. Endothelial cell transfection with cationic liposomes and herpes simplex-thymidine kinase mediated killing. Gene Ther. 1998; 5: 614–620.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
97. Roks AJM, Henning RH, Buikema H, Pinto YM, Kraak MJ, Tio RA, de Zeeuw D, Haisma HJ, Wilschut J, van Gilst WH. Recombinant Semiliki Forest virus as a vector system for fast and selective in vivo gene delivery into balloon-injured rat aorta. Gene Ther. 2002; 9: 95–101.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
98. Parikh SA, Edelman ER. Endothelial cell delivery for cardiovascular therapy. Adv Drug Del Rev. 2000; 42: 139–161.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
99. Dichek DA, Anderson J, Kelly AB, Hanson SR, Harker LA. Enhanced in vivo antithrombotic effects of endothelial cells expressing recombinant plasminogen activators transduced with retroviral vectors. Circulation. 1996; 93: 301–309.
100. Dunn PF, Newman KD, Jones M, Yamada I, Shayani V, Virmai R, Dicheck DA. Seeding of vascular grafts with genetically modified endothelial cells. Circulation. 1996; 93: 1439–1446.
101. Lundell A, Kelly AB, Anderson J, Marijianowski M, Rade JJ, Hanson SR, Harker LA. Reduction in vascular lesion formation by hirudin secreted from retrovirus-transduced confluent endothelial cells on vascular grafts in baboons. Circulation. 1999; 100: 2018–2024.
102. Iwaguro H, Yamaguchi J, Kalka C, Murasawa S, Masuda H, Hayashi S, Silver M, Li T, Isner JM, Asahara T. Endothelial progenitor cell vascular endothelial growth factor gene transfer for vascular regeneration. Circulation. 2002; 105: 732–738.
103. Kullo IJ, Simari RD, Schwartz RS. Vascular gene transfer. From bench to bedside. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999; 19: 196–207.
104. Smith RC, Walsh K. Local gene delivery to the vessel wall. Acta Physiol Scand. 2001; 173: 93–102.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
105. Nabel EJ, Plautz G, Boyce DM, Stanley JC, Nabel GJ. Recombinant gene expression in vivo within endothelial cells of the arterial wall. Science. 1989; 244: 1342–1344.
106. Tahlil O, Brami M, Feldman LJ, Branellec D, Steg PG. The Dispatch TM catheter as a delivery tool for arterial gene transfer. Cardiovasc Res. 1997; 33: 181–187.
107. Flugelman MY, Virmani R, Leon MB, Bowman RL, Dichek DA. Genetically engineered endothelial cells remain adherent and viable after stent deployment and exposure to flow in vitro. Circ Res. 1992; 70: 348–354.
108. Panetta CJ, Miyauchi K, Berry D, Simari RD, Holmes DR, Schwartz RS, Caplice NM. A tissue-engineered stent for cell-based vascular gene transfer. Hum Gene Ther. 2002; 13: 433–441.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
109. Klugherz BD, Jones PL, Cui X, Chen W, Meneveau NF, DeFelice S, Connolly J, Wilensky RL, Levy RJ. Gene delivery from a DNA controlled-release stent in porcine coronary arteries. Nat Biotech. 2000; 18: 1181–1184.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
110. Gewaltig MT, Kojda G. Vasoprotection by nitric oxide: mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Cardiovasc Res. 2002; 55: 250–260.
111. Lum H, Roebuck KA. Oxidant stress and endothelial cell dysfunction. Am J Physiol. 2001; 280: C719–C741.
112. Dhalla NS, Temsah RM, Netticadan T. Role of oxidative stress in cardiovascular diseases. J Hypertens. 2000; 18: 655–673.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
113. de Martin R, Hoeth M, Holfer-Warbineck R, Schmid JA. The transcription factor NF-B and the regulation of vascular cell function. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000; 20: e83–e88.
114. Collins T, Cyblusky MI. NF-B: pivotal mediator or innocent bystander in atherogenesis. J Clin Invest. 2001; 107: 255–264.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
115. Collins T, Read MA, Neish AS, Whitley MZ, Thanos D, Maniatis T. Transcriptional regulation of endothelial cell adhesion molecules: NF-B and cytokine-inducible enhancers. FASEB J. 1995; 9: 899–909.[Abstract]
116. von der Leyen HE, Dzau VJ. Therapeutic potential of nitric oxide synthase gene manipulation. Circulation. 2001; 103: 2760–2765.
117. Koning GA, Schiffelers RM, Storm G. Endothelial cells at inflammatory sites as targets for therapeutic intervention. Endothelium. 2002; 9: 161–171.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
118. Boyle, Jr EM, Canty TG, Morgan EN, Yun W, Pohlman TH, Verrier ED. Treating myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by targeting endothelial cell transcription. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999; 68: 1949–1953.
119. Valen G, Yan Z-Q, Hansson GK. Nuclear Factor Kappa-B and the heart. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38: 307–314.
120. Morishita R, Sugimoto T, Aoki M, Kida I, Tomita N, Moriguchi A, Maeda K, Sawa Y, Kaneda Y, Higaki J, Ogihara T. In vivo transfection of cis element "decoy"against nuclear factor (B binding site prevents myocardial infarction. Nat Med. 1997; 3: 894–899.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
121. Suzuki J, Morishita R, Amano J, Kaneda Y, Isobe M. Decoy against nuclear factor-kappa B attenuates myocardial cell infiltration and arterial neointima formation in murine cardiac allografts. Gen Ther. 2000; 7: 1847–1852.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
122. Losordo DW, Isner JM, Diaz-Sandoval LJ. Endothelial recovery. The next target in restenosis prevention. Circulation. 2003; 107: 2635–2637.
123. Isner JM. Tissue responses to ischemia: local and remote responses for preserving perfusion of ischemic muscle. J Clin Invest. 2000; 106: 615–619.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
124. Laham RJ, Simons M, Sellke F. Gene transfer for angiogenesis in coronary artery disease. Ann Rev Med. 2001; 52: 485–502.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
125. Herttuala SY, Alitalo K. Gene transfer as a tool to induce therapeutic vascular growth. Nat Med. 2003; 9: 694–700.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
126. Boyer M, Townsend LE, Vogel LM, Falk J, Reitz-Vick D, Trevor KT, Villaba M, Bendick PJ, Glover JL. Isolation of endothelial cells and their progenitor cells from human peripheral blood. J Vasc Surg. 2000; 31: 181–189.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
127. Asahara T, Masuda H, Takahashi T, Kalka C, Pastore C, Silver M, Kearne M, Magner M, Isner JM. Bone marrow origin of endothelial progenitor cells responsible for postnatal vasculogenesis in physiological and pathological neovascularization Circ Res. 1999; 85: 221–228.
128. Yamashita J, Itoh H, Hirashima M, Ogawa M, Nishikawa S, Yurugi T, Naito M, Nakao K, Nishikawa S. Flk1-positive cells derived from embryonic stem cells serve as vascular progenitors. Nature. 2000; 408: 92–96.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
129. Hristov M, Erl W, Weber PC. Endothelial progenitor cells: Mobilization, differentiation, and homing. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23: 1185–1189.
130. Kalka C, Masuda H, Takahashi T, Kalka-Moll WM, Silver M, Kearney M, Li T, Isner JM, Asahara T. Transplantation of ex vivo expanded endothelial progenitor cells for therapeutic neovascularization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97: 3422–3427.
131. Takahashi T, Kalka C, Masuda H, Chen D, Silver M, Kearney M, Magner M, Isner JM, Asahara T. Ischemia- and cytokine-indiced mobilization of bone-marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells for neovascularization. Nat Med. 1999; 5: 434–438.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
132. Kawamoto A, Gwon H-C, Iwaguro H, Yamaguchi J, Uchida S, Masuda H, Silver M, Ma, H, Kearney M, Isner JM, Asahara T. Therapeutic potential of ex vivo expanded endothelial progenitor cells for myocardial ischemia. Circulation. 2001; 103: 634–637.
133. Ikenaga S, Hamano K, Nishida M, Kobayashi T, Li T-S, Kobayashi S, Matsuzaki M, Zempo N, Esato K. Autologous bone marrow implantation induced angiogenesis and improved deteriorated exercise capacity in a rat ischemic hindlimb model. J Surg Res. 2001; 96: 277–283.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
134. Kocher AA, Schuster MD, Szabolcs MJ, Burkhoff D, Wang J, Homma S, Edwards NM, Itescu S. Neovascularization of ischemic myocardium by human bone-marrow-derived angioblasts prevents cardiomyocyte apoptosis, reduces remodeling and improves cardiac function. Nat Med. 2001; 7: 430–436.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
135. Kalka C, Masuda H, Takahashi T, Gordon R, Tepper O, Gravereaux E, Pieczek A, Iwaguro H, Hayashi S-I, Isner JM, Asahara T. Vascular endothelial growth factor165 gene transfer augments circulating endothelial progenitor cells in human subjects. Circ Res. 2000; 86: 1198–1202.
136. Kalka C, Tehrani H, Laudernberg B, Vale P, Isner JM, Asahara T, Symes JF. Mobilization of endothelial progenitor cells following gene therapy with VEGF165 in patients with inoperable coronary disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000; 70: 829–834.
137. Shintani S, Murohara T, Ikeda H, Ueni T, Honma T, Katoh A, Sasaki K, Shimada T, Oike Y, Imaizumi T. Mobilization of endothelial progenitor cells in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2001; 103: 2776–2779.
138. Lee SH, Wolf PL, Escudero R, Deutsch R, Jamieson SW, Thistlethwaite PA. Early expression of angiogenesis factors in acute myocardial ischemia and infarction. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342: 626–633. 240.
139. Frangogiannis NG, Lindsey ML, Michael LH, Youker KA, Bressler RB, Mendoza LH, Spengler RN, Smith CW, Entman ML. Resident cardiac mast cells degranulate and release preformed TNF-
, initiating the cytokine cascade in experimental canine myocardial ischemia/reperfusion. Circulation. 1998; 98: 699–710.
140. Woldbaek PR, Hoen IB, Christensen G, Tonnessen T. Woldbaek PR, Hoen IB, Christensen G, Tonnessen T. Gene expression of colony-stimulating factors and stem cell factor after myocardial infarction in the mouse. Acta Physiol Scand. 2002; 173–181.
141. Rabbany SY, Heissig B, Hattori K, Rafii S. Molecular pathways regulating mobilization of marrow-derived stem cells for tissue revascularization. Trends Mol Med. 2003; 9: 109–117.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
142. Kong D, Melo LG, Gnecchi M, Zhang L, Mostoslavsky G, Liew CC, Pratt RE, Dzau VJ. Cytokine-induced mobilization of endothelial progenitor cells enhances repair of injured arteries. Circulation. In press.
143. Masuda H, Asahara T. Post-natal endothelial progenitor cells for neovascularization and tissue regeneration. Cardiovasc Res. 2003; 58: 390–398.
144. Kawamoto A, Tkebuchava T, Yamaguchi J, Nishimura H, Yoon YS, Milliken C, Uchida S, Masuo O, Iwaguro H, Ma H, Hanley A, Silver M, Kearney M, Losordo DW, Isner JM, Asahara T. Intramyocardial transplantation of autologous endothelial progenitor cells for therapeutic neovascularization. Circulation. 2003; 107: 461–468.
145. Kamihata H, Matsubara H, Nishiue T, Fujiyama S, Amano K, Iba O, Imada T, Iwasaka T. Improvement of collateral perfusion and regional function by implantation of peripheraal blood mononuclear cells into ischemic hybernating myocardium. Arterioscler Vasc Biol. 2002; 22: 1804–1810.
146. Kamihata H, Matsubara H, Nishiue T, Fujiyama S, Tsutsumi Y, Ozono R, Masaki H, Mori Y, Iba O, Tateishi E, Kosaki A, Shintani S, Murohara T, Imaizumi T, Iwasaka T. Implantation of bone marrow mononuclear cells into ischemic myocardium enhances collateral perfusion and regional function via side supply of angioblasts, angiogenic ligands, and cytokines. Circulation. 2001; 104: 1046–1052.
147. Kobayashi T, Hamano K, Li TS, Katoh T, Kobayashi S, Matsuzaki M, Esato K. Enhancement of angiogenesis by the implantation of self bone marrow cells in a rat ischemic heart model. J Surg Res. 2000; 89: 189–195.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
148. Fuchs S, Baffour R, Zhou YF, Shou M, Pierre A, Tio FO, Weissman NJ, Leon MB, Epstein SE, Kornowski R. Transendocardial delivery of autologous bone marrow enhances collateral perfusion and regional function in pigs with chronic experimental myocardial ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37: 1726–1732.
149. Iba O, Matsubara H, Nozawa Y, Fujiyama S, Amano K, Mori Y, Kojima H, Iwasaka T. Angiogenesis by implantation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and platelets into ischemic limbs. Circulation. 2002; 106: 2019–2025.
150. Murohara T, Ikeda H, Duan J, Shintani S, Sasaki K, Eguchi H, Onitsuka I, Matsui K, Imaizumi T. Transplanted cord blood-derived endothelial precursor cells augments postnatal neovascularization. J Clin Invest. 2000; 105: 1527–1536.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
151. Yamaguchi J, Kusano KF, Masuo O, Kawamoto A, Silver M, Murasawa S, Bosch-Marce M, Masuda H, Losordo DW, Isner JM, Asahara T. Stromal cell-derived factor-1 effects on ex vivo expanded endothelial progenitor cell recruitment for ischemic neovascularization. Circulation. 2003; 107: 1322–1328.
152. Dimmeler S, Aicher A, Vasa M, Mildner-Rihm C, Adler K, Tiemann M, Rutten H, Fichtlscherer S, Martin H, Zeiher AM. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) increase endothelial progenitor cells via the PI3-kinase/Akt pathway. J Clin Invest. 2001; 108: 391–397.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
153. Vasa M, Fichtlscherer S, Adler K, Aicher A, Martin H, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Increase in circulating endothelial progenitor cells by statin therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2001; 103: 2885–2890.
154. Nugent HM, Rogers C, Edelman ER. Endothelial implants inhibit intimal hyperplasia after porcine angioplasty. Circ Res. 1999; 84: 384–391.
155. Nugent HM, Edelman ER. Tissue engineering therapy for cardiovascular disease. Circ Res. 2003; 92: 1068–1078.
156. Nerem RM, Seliktar D. Vascular tissue engineering. Ann Rev Biomed Eng. 2001; 3: 225–243.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
157. Walter DH, Rittig K, Bahlmann FH, Kirchmair R, Silver M, Murayama T, Nishimura H, Losordo DW, Asahara T, Isner JM. Statin therapy accelerates reendothelialization: a novel effect involving mobilization and incorporation of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells. Circulation. 2002; 105: 3017–3024.
158. Werner N, Priller J, Laufs U, Endres M, Bohm M, Dirnagl U, Nickenig G. Bone marrow-derived progenitor cells modulate vascular reendothelialization and neointimal formation. Effect of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibition. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002; 22: 1567–1572.
159. Strehlow K, Werner N, Berweiler J, Link A, Dirnagl U, Priller J, Laufs K, Ghaeni L, Milosevic M, Bohm M, Nickenig G. Estrogen increases bone-marrow derived endothelial progenitor cell production and diminishes neointima formation. Circulation. 2003; 107: 3059–3065.
160. Assmus B, Urbich C, Aicher A, Hofmann WK, Haendeler J, Rossig L, Spyridopoulos I, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors reduce senescence and increase proliferation of endothelial progenitor cells via regulation of cell cycle regulatory genes. Circ Res. 2003; 92: 1049–1055.
161. Shirota T, Yasui H, Shimokawa H, Matsuda T. Fabrication of endothelial progenitor cell (EPC)-seeded intravascular stent devices and in vitro endothelialization on hybrid vascular tissue. Biomaterials. 2003; 24: 2295–2302.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
162. Consigny PM. Endothelial cell seeding on prosthetic surfaces. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2000; 10: 79–95.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
163. Maeda M, Fukui A, Nakamura T, Inada Y, Tamai S, Haga S, Tatsumi-Nagano K, Yamamoto H, Ogata S, Iwata H, Ikada Y. Progenitor endothelial cells on vascular grafts: an ultrastructural study. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000; 51: 55–60.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
164. Flugelman MY, Virmani R, Leon MB, Bowman RL, Dichek DA. Genetically engineered endothelial cells remain adherent and viable after stent deployment and exposure to flow un vitro. Circ Res. 1992; 70: 348–354.
165. Van Belle E, Tio FO, Couffinhal T, Maillard L, Passeri J, Isner JM. Stent endothelialization: Time course, impact of local catheter delivery, feasibility of recombinant protein administration, and response to cytokine expedition. Circulation. 1997; 95: 438–448.
166. Bhattacharya V, Shi Q, Ishida A, Sauvage LR, Hammond WP, Wu MH. Administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor enhances endothelialization and microvessel formation in small caliber synthetic vascular grafts. J Vasc Surg. 2000; 32: 116–123.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
167. Shi Q, Bhattacharya V, Hong-De, Wu M, Sauvage LR. Utilizing granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to enhance vascular graft endothelialization from circulating blood cells. Ann Vasc Surg. 2002; 16: 314–320.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
168. Hill JM, Zalos G, Halcox JPG, Schenke WH, Waclawin MA, Ouyyumi A, Finkel T. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells, vascular function and cardiovascular risk. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348: 593–600.
169. Murasawa S, Llevadot J, Silver M, Isner JM, Losordo DW, Asahara T. Constitutive human telomerase reverse transcriptase expression enhances regenerative properties of endothelial progenitor cells. Circulation. 2002; 106: 1133–1139.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  H. Froehlich, R. Gulati, B. Boilson, T. Witt, A. Harbuzariu, L. Kleppe, A. B. Dietz, A. Lerman, and R. D. Simari Carotid Repair Using Autologous Adipose-Derived Endothelial Cells Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): 1886 - 1891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. Hecht, J. Rong, A. L. F. Sampaio, C. Hermesh, C. Rutledge, R. Shemesh, A. Toporik, M. Beiman, L. Dassa, H. Niv, et al. A Novel Peptide Agonist of Formyl-Peptide Receptor-Like 1 (ALX) Displays Anti-Inflammatory and Cardioprotective Effects J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2009; 328(2): 426 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Deckers, B. Quesson, J. Arsaut, S. Eimer, F. Couillaud, and C. T. W. Moonen Image-guided, noninvasive, spatiotemporal control of gene expression PNAS, January 27, 2009; 106(4): 1175 - 1180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A.-L. Levonen, E. Vahakangas, J. K. Koponen, and S. Yla-Herttuala Antioxidant Gene Therapy for Cardiovascular Disease: Current Status and Future Perspectives Circulation, April 22, 2008; 117(16): 2142 - 2150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Khurana, M. Simons, J. F. Martin, and I. C. Zachary Role of Angiogenesis in Cardiovascular Disease: A Critical Appraisal Circulation, September 20, 2005; 112(12): 1813 - 1824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||