| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atherosclerosis and Lipoproteins |
From Laboratorio de Investigación Molecular (M.A., A.C., C.G., F.C.), Servicio de Cardiología (J.M.C.), and Servicio de Medicina Interna (I.V., F.C.), Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza; Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular y Celular (A.G., M.P.), Universidad de Zaragoza; Servicio de Neurología (I.J.), Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza; and Servicio de Bioquímica (J.P.), Hospital San Jorge, Huesca, Spain.
Correspondence to Marta Artieda, Laboratorio de Investigación Molecular, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Isabel la Católica, 1-3, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain. E-mail martieda{at}hmservet.insalud.es
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results We assayed the serum chitotriosidase activity and a common chitotriosidase gene polymorphism that causes deficiency in chitotriosidase activity in 3 Spanish populations, ATS (n=153), IHD (n=124), and control (n=148) subjects. Statistical differences were found in serum chitotriosidase activity between ATS (88.1±4.6 nmol/mL · h, P<0.0001) and IHD subjects (79.0±6.3, P=0.002) versus control group (70.9±5.2). These observed differences were not attributable to a distinct allelic or genotype distribution. The extension of the atherosclerotic lesion in carotids of ATS subjects was measured by duplex sonography. Chitotriosidase activities were 66.9±9.6, 88.7±8.3, and 107.7±11.8 for subjects with carotid stenosis
30%, 31% to 60%, and >60%, respectively. Statistical differences were observed between subjects with major and intermediate stenosis grade compared with subjects with minor stenosis, P=0.005 and P=0.016, respectively.
Conclusions Serum chitotriosidase activity is significantly increased in individuals suffering from atherosclerosis disease and is related to the severity of the atherosclerotic lesion, suggesting a possible role as atherosclerotic extent marker.
Key Words: chitotriosidase macrophage atherothrombotic stroke ischemic heart disease atherosclerosis
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chitotriosidase, one of the most quantitative proteins secreted by activated macrophages, is a human chitinase member of family 18 glycosyl hydrolases.79 It is synthesized as a 50-kDa protein containing a 39-kDa N-terminal catalytic domain, a hinge region, and a C-terminal chitin-binding domain. It is predominantly secreted but in part processed into a 39-kDa form that accumulates in lysosomes. In the blood stream, the secretory 50-kDa chitotriosidase occurs predominantly, whereas in tissues, the 39-kDa form is also abundant.10 A common chitotriosidase gene polymorphism leads to a null allele and therefore a defective protein. The nature of this common deficiency in chitotriosidase activity is a 24-base pair (bp) duplication in exon 10 of the chitotriosidase gene that results in activation of a cryptic 3' splice site, generating a mRNA with an in-frame deletion of 87 nucleotides, encoding a protein that lacks an internal stretch of 29 amino acids.11 This genetic variation is responsible for the recessive inherited deficiency in chitotriosidase activity and is found in individuals from various ethnic origins. In white populations, 30% to 40% of individuals are carriers of this abnormal chitotriosidase allele and approximately 6% are homozygous.12,13
Chitotriosidase is synthesized exclusively by activated macrophages, and its activity has been proposed as a biochemical marker of macrophage accumulation in several lysosomal diseases, especially in Gauchers disease.12,14 Recently, Boot et al15 have shown that chitotriosidase activity was elevated up to 55-fold in extracts of atherosclerotic tissue, showing a clear connection between chitotriosidase expression and lipid-laden macrophages inside human atherosclerotic vessel wall.
The aim of this study was to determine whether serum chitotriosidase activity is increased in individuals experiencing an ischemic stroke of atherothrombotic etiology and in subjects with ischemic heart disease and, in that way, if chitotriosidase activity could be related to the extension of atherosclerosis.
To evaluate our hypothesis, we analyzed the serum chitotriosidase activity and the described chitotriosidase gene polymorphism in a group of subjects with ischemic stroke of atherothrombotic origin, in a group of subjects with ischemic heart disease, and in a group of control subjects.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The ischemic heart disease (IHD) group consisted of 124 nonrelated Spanish subjects with stabilized unstable angina. Inclusion criterion was the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease by coronary arteriography with at least 1 of the following conditions in the angiographic scores: vessel score
1, stenosis score
4, and extent score
12. Exclusion criteria were acute myocardial infarction, coronary bypass surgery, or coronary angioplasty. A group of 148 nonrelated Spanish subjects with normal lipid profile and without symptomatic atherosclerosis disease was also included in the study and considered the control group.
The study was approved by the ethic committee of the Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, and all subjects gave written informed consent.
Samples
Venous blood samples were collected into tubes containing Na2EDTA (to obtain genomic DNA) and into tubes containing SST clot activating gel (to obtain serum) after a 12-hour fast. The serum samples tubes were allowed to clot before centrifugation. After centrifugation at 4°C for 15 minutes at 3500 rpm, serum was aliquoted and immediately frozen at -80°C. Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood cells using the salting-out method.17 DNA was quantified and diluted to a final concentration of 100 ng/µL to be used in polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. Samples were collected within 48 hours after the clinical onset of the stroke (ATS group) or at the time of programmed coronary arteriography out of the acute event (IHD group).
Quantification of Lipids and Lipoproteins
Total serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels were quantified enzymatically with a Beckman Synchron CX7 analyzer (Boehringer Mannheim). HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) was measured after precipitation of apolipoprotein Bcontaining lipoproteins with Mg++ phosphotungstate (Boehringer Mannheim). LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) was calculated by the Friedewald formula.18 Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] was determined by kinetic immunonephelometry with polyclonal antibodies (Beckman).19
Chitotriosidase Enzyme Assay
Chitotriosidase enzyme assay was based on the method described by Hollak et al12 with minor modifications. Briefly, chitotriosidase activity was determined by incubating 10 µL of serum with 200 µL of 22 µmol/L fluorogenic substrate 4-methylumbelliferyl-ß-D-N,N',N''''-triacetylchitotrioside (Sigma) in McIlvain buffer (100 mmol/L citric acid and 200 mmol/L sodium phosphate, pH 5.2) for 15 minutes at 37°C. The reaction was stopped with 2 mL of 0.3 mol/L glycine-NaOH buffer (pH 10.6) by mixing at room temperature. The substrate hydrolysis by chitotriosidase produces the fluorescent molecule 4-methylumbelliferone, which was quantified with a fluorometer (Kontron Instruments), excitation at 366 nm and emission at 446 nm, and compared with a standard 4-methylumbelliferone calibration curve. Chitotriosidase activity was expressed as nanomoles of substrate hydrolyzed per hour per milliliter of incubated serum. Serum chitotriosidase activity was measured by duplication and coefficient of variation was less than 5% in all cases.
DNA Analysis
Determination of the 24-bp duplication in the chitotriosidase gene was performed by PCR followed by electrophoresis of the amplified fragments. PCR reaction was performed using Taq DNA polymerase (Gibco BRL), genomic DNA as template, and the oligonucleotides previously described.11 Genomic DNA was subjected to 30 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 1 minute, annealing at 48°C for 50 seconds, and extension at 72°C for 50 seconds, followed by a final extension of 10 minutes at 72°C. Fragments of 75 and 99 bp were amplified from wild-type and defective allele, respectively. Amplified DNA fragments were electrophoresed on a 3% NuSieve agarose gel (BioWhittaker Molecular Applications) and visualized by staining with ethidium bromide.
Assessment of the Atherosclerotic Lesion Extent
ATS Group
Extension of atherosclerotic lesion was measured by duplex sonography combining continuous-wave Doppler and B-mode imaging to evaluate the stenosis degree and the plaque morphology in common and internal carotids.20,21 The extent of carotid atherosclerosis was expressed as stenosis grade in a scale 0% to 100%.
IHD Group
Extension of coronary atherosclerosis was evaluated in a blinded manner from results of coronary arteriographies with the following 3 different scores: (1) vessel score, the number of major vessels with significant coronary stenosis according to the BARI protocol22; (2) stenosis score, the addition of stenosis in 8 different proximal segments (stenosis <50%=1, 50% to 74%=2, 75% to 99%=3 and total occlusion=4)2325; and (3) extent score, the addition of segment longitudinal extension of all coronary lesions within the 8 proximal segments.26,27
High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Assay
Serum concentrations of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) were measured by kinetic immunonephelometry (Beckman Coulter Image Immunochemistry System).28 hsCRP was expressed as milligram per liter.
Statistical Methods
Most of the statistical analyses were performed by using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS Inc) version 6.1.3. A
2 analysis was performed to confirm that the studied polymorphism in the 3 groups was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Genotype and allele frequencies were compared by
2 analysis. Distributions of all quantitative variables were tested for normality. Data are expressed as mean±SD. Data without a normal distribution (HDL-C, triglycerides, and body mass index [BMI]) were log-transformed before analysis. Anti-logs and unadjusted mean values±SD of the lipid traits are presented in the tables. Quantitative variables were compared with ANOVA one factor adjusted for age, sex, and BMI. Plasma levels of Lp(a) and log Lp(a) were not normally distributed, and, therefore, comparisons of this variable were done with nonparametric analysis, the Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric tests. Hypothetic associations between the studied polymorphism and plasma lipid levels were studied by ANOVA multivariate with the variables sex, age, and BMI as covariates. Serum chitotriosidase activity was reported as mean±SE. This variable was not normally distributed, but log chitotriosidase activity had a normal distribution. Comparisons of chitotriosidase activity were done with log chitotriosidase activity adjusted for age by ANOVA one factor. This test was performed to compare chitotriosidase activity between genotypes and studied groups (ATS, IHD, and control). Backward linear regression analysis was performed with the dependent variable log chitotriosidase activity. Linear regression estimates the regression coefficients (B) of the linear equation, involving the independent variables that better predict the value of the dependent variable. To evaluate the value of chitotriosidase activity measurements in the diagnosis of atherosclerosis disease (ATS and IHD groups), the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of chitotriosidase activity measurements with respect to control group were computed, defined as the sum of the concordant cells divided by the sum of all cells in a 2-by-2 table. hsCRP was reported as mean±SE. This variable was not normally distributed, but log hsCRP had a normal distribution. Comparisons of hsCRP were done with log hsCRP by ANOVA one factor. A value of P<0.05 was considered statistical significant for all above analyses. Multiple comparisons of chitotriosidase activity and stenosis grade were done with log chitotriosidase activity adjusted for age by ANOVA one factor and the Bonferroni adjustment. When 3 groups were compared, a value of P<0.0167 was considered statistically significant by Bonferroni adjustment.
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chitotriosidase Gene Polymorphism
The 24-bp duplication polymorphism in exon 10 of the chitotriosidase gene was determined by PCR amplification, as shown in Figure 1. The resulting genotypic and allelic frequencies are shown in Table 2. Frequencies of defective allele were 0.24 (CI 95%, 0.19 to 0.29), 0.20 (CI 95%, 0.15 to 0.25), and 0.22 (CI 95%, 0.17 to 0.27) in the ATS, IHD, and control groups, respectively. There were no differences in the allelic distributions between subjects in ATS and IHD groups versus control group. The genotype distributions were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, and there were no differences in these genotype distributions between subjects in ATS and IHD groups versus control group. No association between the polymorphism and plasma total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides, and Lp(a) levels was observed when all studied groups were analyzed as a whole or for each group separately (data not shown).
|
|
Chitotriosidase Activity
Backward linear regression analysis showed a positive correlation between chitotriosidase activity and age (R=0.305, P<0.0001). Because serum chitotriosidase activity correlated with age, comparisons were carried out adjusting for age. In Figure 2, log serum chitotriosidase activities are presented as box whisker plots for each of the 3 studied groups clustered by chitotriosidase genotype. Chitotriosidase activity in the whole ATS group was 88.1±4.6 nmol/mL · h (mean±SE), in IHD group was 79.0±6.3 nmol/mL · h, and in control group was 70.9±5.2 nmol/mL · h. Differences were statistically significant between ATS versus control subjects (P<0.0001) and between IHD versus control subjects (P=0.002). Absence of chitotriosidase activity was observed in homozygous defective allele (DD) subjects in 9 (5.9%), 7 (5.7%), and 9 (6.1%) subjects in the ATS, IHD, and control groups, respectively. Chitotriosidase activities of homozygous normal allele (NN) subjects were as follows: 111.2±6.1, 101.5±8.3, and 96.5±6.7 nmol/mL · h for ATS, IHD, and control groups, respectively. There were statistical differences between ATS versus control groups (P=0.009) and between IHD versus control groups (P=0.020). Chitotriosidase activities of heterozygous defective allele (ND) subjects were 65.5±4.4, 43.8±4.8, and 35.5±4.4 nmol/mL · h for ATS, IHD, and control groups, respectively. The differences between ATS and control groups (P<0.0001) and between IHD and control groups (P=0.023) were statistically significant. In each studied group, serum chitotriosidase activity was significantly higher in homozygous NN subjects than in heterozygous ND subjects (P<0.0001).
|
Chitotriosidase Activity Variability
To identify predictors for quitotriosidase activity variability, a multiple backward linear regression analysis was performed. The dependent variable was log chitotriosidase activity, and the variables LDL-C, HDL-C, TG, Lp(a), chitotriosidase genotype, age, sex, BMI, and group were included as independent variables. The independent variable group was separated in 2 subgroups in this analysis, subjects with atherosclerosis disease (ATS and IHD groups) and subjects without atherosclerosis disease (control group). Multiple linear regression analysis displayed a correlation (multiple R=0.611, adjusted R2=0.366) between log chitotriosidase activity and the independent variables chitotriosidase genotype (NN genotype, B=0.343±0.030, P<0.0001; ND genotype, B=-0.343±0.030, P<0.0001), age (B=0.011±0.002, P<0.0001), and group (B=0.138±0.030, P<0.0001). B represents the regression coefficient that is expressed as mean±SD. The variables LDL-C, HDL-C, TG, Lp(a), sex, and BMI did not correlate with chitotriosidase activity.
Predictive Value of Chitotriosidase Activity Measurements
To evaluate the value of chitotriosidase activity measurements in the diagnosis of atherosclerosis disease, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of chitotriosidase activity measurements for ATS (NN) subjects, ATS (ND) subjects, IHD (NN) subjects, and IHD (ND) subjects versus control group, respectively, as shown in Table 3. These values were calculated at various chitotriosidase activity cutoff levels, the 10th, 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles.
|
Stenosis and Chitotriosidase Activity
To assess the relationship between chitotriosidase activity and the arterial intima-media thickness, we analyzed the carotid stenosis data of the ATS subjects proved by duplex sonography. The ATS group presented a carotid stenosis of 55.4±20.4% (mean±SD). Chitotriosidase activities for 3 subgroups with different stenosis grade were as follows: 66.9±9.5 nmol/mL · h for stenosis
30%, 88.7±8.3 nmol/mL · h for stenosis 31% to 60%, and 107.7±11.8 nmol/mL · h for stenosis >60%. Statistical differences were found between subjects with stenosis of 31% to 60% and subjects with stenosis >60% compared with subjects with stenosis
30%, P=0.016 and P=0.005, respectively. To rule out the possibility that chitotriosidase activity differences observed were attributable to a distinct genotype distribution, we also performed this analysis by genotype, as shown in Figure 3. Homozygous NN and heterozygous ND subjects showed increased levels of chitotriosidase activity with larger stenosis grade, as follows: NN subjects, 87.0±14.4, 112.6±9.7, and 138.2±16.5 nmol/mL · h; ND subjects, 49.5±8.4, 68.7±8.5, and 82.1±10.1 nmol/mL · h for stenosis
30%, 31% to 60%, and >60%, respectively.
|
The same analysis was carried out with the angiographic scores of the IHD subjects. The IHD group presented a vessel score of 1.03±0.84, a stenosis score of 9.47±4.10, and an extent score of 42.92±18.70 (mean±SD). In this case, when chitotriosidase activity was compared with the angiographic scores, no significant differences were found.
Chitotriosidase Activity and High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein
We investigated the relation of chitotriosidase activity with C-reactive protein, a well-known inflammatory protein. For this purpose, we measured the high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) in 138 control subjects, the values being 0.34±0.06 mg/L (mean±SE). Moreover, we measured the chitotriosidase activity and hsCRP in 43 patients of lysosomal Gauchers disease, genetic and biochemically diagnosed,32 in which chitotriosidase activity is a biochemical marker, because it is over 2 orders of magnitude compared with healthy control individuals. hsCRP in these subjects was 0.42±0.13 mg/L. Chitotriosidase activity was 170.70-fold increased compared with control subjects, 12107.8±1776.2 versus 70.9±5.2 nmol/mL · h (mean±SE). There were statistical differences in chitotriosidase activity between Gaucher versus control subjects (P<0.0001), but no statistical differences in hsCRP values were found. Backward linear regression analysis showed absence of correlation between chitotriosidase activity and hsCRP in both groups.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The allelic frequencies of the 24-bp duplication in the chitotriosidase gene that causes deficiency in chitotriosidase activity in the ATS, IHD, and control groups were very similar to those reported in Dutch and Ashkenazi Jewish populations.11 These data suggest that this duplication seems to be relatively ancient in the evolution. Because there were no differences in the allelic and genotype distributions between the studied groups, we can rule out the possibility that chitotriosidase activity differences observed between groups were attributable to distinct genotype distributions, and, therefore, we can rule out a pathogenetic role of chitotriosidase gene polymorphism in atherosclerosis disease. According to the relationship between genotype and activity observed in this study, chitotriosidase activity seems to be inherited as an autosomal incompletely dominant trait, with no chitotriosidase activity in homozygous DD subjects and approximately half NN activities in heterozygous ND subjects.
Enzyme chitotriosidase can be considered an inflammatory protein because it is only secreted by activated macrophages, but its production happens after at least 1 week of cell culture and increases with time; therefore, it does not behave as an acute reactive protein but rather as a chronic inflammatory marker.7 We investigated the relation of chitotriosidase activity with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, a well-known marker of overall systemic inflammation, in control subjects and in patients with Gauchers disease. The high increase of chitotriosidase activity in Gauchers disease is secondary to a well-established primary defect, a deficiency of the lysosomal hydrolase ß-glucocerebrosidase attributable to mutations in its gene that produce macrophage activation by its intracellular glucosylceramide accumulation. Only chitotriosidase activity was highly increased in patients with Gauchers disease, hsCRP showed the same levels as control subjects, and there was no correlation between chitotriosidase activity and hsCRP in both groups. Therefore, these inflammatory markers seem to be regulated by different mechanisms. In accordance with this, it has been reported that chitotriosidase activity is related to intracellular lipid accumulation in Gauchers disease12,33,34 and does not modify after 6 months of hypolipidemic treatment,35 whereas hsCRP decreases by 29% in the same subjects with mixed hyperlipemia.36 Previous studies have demonstrated that the macrophages within atherosclerotic vascular plaques produce high amounts of chitotriosidase,15 which led us to hypothesize that serum quitotriosidase activity could be related to the amount of lipid-loaded macrophages in the atherosclerotic arterial wall, as it does occur in Gauchers disease. The results presented in this work confirm our hypothesis, because serum chitotriosidase activity in ATS and IHD patients was higher than in control subjects. One important aspect of our study was the precise selection of the patients included to ensure that all had atherosclerosis disease. Especially in the stroke group, where the etiology may be very heterogeneous, we selected only those subjects with specific criteria of atherothrombotic cerebrovascular disease, excluding other possible etiologies. Moreover, the atherosclerotic lesion extent was quantified in all selected subjects from ATS and IHD groups.
As described above, ATS and IHD groups had significantly higher chitotriosidase activities than the control group, and ATS subjects had higher chitotriosidase activity than IHD subjects. The latter observation probably reflects the fact that subjects with atherothrombotic cerebrovascular disease have an atherosclerosis process more widespread than subjects with ischemic heart disease, whose atherosclerosis is localized more specifically in the coronary vessels. Moreover, our results have shown that chitotriosidase activity was related to carotid stenosis in the ATS group, which is in accordance with a situation of more widespread atherosclerosis. According to this hypothesis, previous reported series and clinical trials have demonstrated that patients with cerebrovascular disease are more likely to die in follow-up from cardiovascular than from cerebrovascular causes.37,38
In this study, we have found an age-dependent increase in serum chitotriosidase activity. A similar effect of age on chitotriosidase activity has been previously described in subjects with different lysosomal disorders and in the general population.14,15,34 This age-dependent increase in chitotriosidase activity could be explained by the ongoing accumulation of lipid-laden macrophages during the gradual progression of atherosclerosis in relation to age.
Laboratory and prospective clinical studies3942 have recently reinforced the inflammatory theory proposed by Ross,2 who stated that each step of the molecular and cellular responses leading to atherosclerosis is an inflammatory process. At present, it is considered that inflammation plays both a central role in the beginning of atherosclerosis process and in the mechanism underlying the development and progression of the atherosclerosis complications, plaque rupture and subsequent thrombosis. Continued inflammation results in increased numbers of macrophages and lymphocytes, both markers of ongoing inflammation, emigrating from the blood into the lesion. Macrophages are present in all phases of atherogenesis and are markers of unstable atherosclerotic plaques. Macrophage-rich areas are more frequently found in patients with unstable angina than in patients with stable angina.43 Our results would suggest that macrophage accumulation localized in supra-aortic and coronary vessels is associated with increased serum chitotriosidase activity. If true, chitotriosidase activity could reflect the state of activation of macrophages, possibly within atherosclerotic lesions.
The exact mechanism underlying the induction of chitotriosidase expression in macrophages in unknown. We can only speculate on the physiological role of chitotriosidase in atherogenesis, because no human endogenous chitin-like substances are known at present. Recently, Boot et al44 reported the identification of a second mammalian chitinase named acidic mammalian chitinase in the gastrointestinal tract and lung. It is possible that the acidic mammalian chitinase could play a role in digestion and/or defense because of its expression tissue distribution. Meanwhile, the chitotriosidase could be involved in the tissue-remodelling processes that take place during atherogenesis.
Chitotriosidase activity measurement in clinical practice has several important limitations. First, it is necessary to adjust serum activity with chitotriosidase genotype because of the high frequency of the defective allele in the general population. Second, there is a large range of serum chitotriosidase activity values in control subjects, even sharing the same genotype, and an overlap exists between serum chitotriosidase activity values from control and affected subjects. For this reason, the sensitivity and specificity of chitotriosidase activity measurements at the analyzed cutoff levels have values with high sensitivity but low specificity or with high specificity but low sensitivity. Therefore, the accuracy has values below 72% in both ATS and IHD groups and in both NN and ND subjects. Third, little is known about physiological role of chitotriosidase and the mechanisms that could modify its activity in humans, and they could be relevant in clinical practice. For these reasons, chitotriosidase activity measurements in the diagnosis of atherosclerosis disease have relatively weak predictive value as a marker of atherosclerotic lesion.
Three major conclusions can be made from our results, with the limitations described above. High serum chitotriosidase activity in patients with atherosclerosis demonstrates in vivo the presence of activated macrophages in such subjects. Serum chitotriosidase activity is related to the severity of the atherosclerotic lesions, suggesting a possible role as a marker of atherosclerotic extension. Finally, this increase of serum chitotriosidase activity demonstrates that it is feasible to measure functional aspects of macrophages from blood samples of patients with atherosclerosis.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received April 3, 2003; accepted June 23, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Ross R. Atherosclerosis: an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340: 115126.
3. Zaman AG, Helft G, Worthley SG, Badimon JJ. The role of plaque rupture and thrombosis in coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis. 2000; 149: 251266.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Stary HC. Evolution and progression of atherosclerotic lesions in coronary arteries of children and young adults. Arteriosclerosis. 1989; 9 (suppl I): 1932.
5. Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Farb A, Schwartz SM. Lessons from sudden coronary death: a comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000; 20: 12621275.
6. Febbraio M, Podrez EA, Smith JD, Hajjar DP, Hazen SL, Hoff HF, Sharma K, Silverstein RL. Targeted disruption of the class B scavenger receptor CD36 protects against atherosclerotic lesion development in mice. J Clin Invest. 2000; 105: 10491056.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Boot RG, Renkema GH, Strijland A, van Zonneveld AJ, Aerts JM. Cloning of a cDNA encoding chitotriosidase, a human chitinase produced by macrophages. J Biol Chem. 1995; 270: 2625226256.
8. Hakala BE, White C, Recklies AD. Human cartilage gp-39, a major secretory product of articular chondrocytes and synovial cells, is a mammalian member of chitinase protein family. J Biol Chem. 1993; 268: 2580325810.
9. Renkema GH, Boot RG, Au FL, Donker-Koopman WE, Strijland A, Muijsers AO, Hrebicek M, Aerts JM. Chitotriosidase, a chitinase, and the 39-kDa human cartilage glycoprotein, a chitin-binding lectin, are homologues of family 18 glycosyl hydrolases secreted by human macrophages. Eur J Biochem. 1998; 251: 504509.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Renkema GH, Boot RG, Strijland A, Donker-Koopman WE, van der Berg M, Muijsers AO, Aerts JM. Synthesis, sorting, and processing into distinct isoforms of human macrophage chitotriosidase. Eur J Biochem. 1997; 244: 279285.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Boot RG, Renkema GH, Verhoek M, Strijland A, Bliek J, de Meulemeester TM, Mannens MM, Aerts JM. The human chitotriosidase gene: nature of inherited enzyme deficiency. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273: 2568025685.
12. Hollak CE, van Weely S, van Oers MH, Aerts JM. Marked elevation of plasma chitotriosidase activity: a novel hallmark of Gaucher disease. J Clin Invest. 1994; 93: 12881292.
13. Eiberg H, den Tandt WR. Assignment of human plasma methylumbelliferyl-tetra-N-acetylchitotetraoside or chitinase to chromosome 19 by a linkage study. Hum Genet. 1997; 101: 205207.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Guo Y, He W, Boer AM, Wevers RA, de Bruijn AM, Groener JE, Hollak CE, Aerts JM, Galjaard H, van Diggelen OP. Elevated plasma chitotriosidase activity in various lysosomal storage disorders. J Inher Metab Dis. 1995; 18: 717722.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Boot RG, van Achterberg TA, van Aken BE, Renkema GH, Jacobs MJ, Aerts JM, Vries CJ. Strong induction of members of the chitinase family of proteins in atherosclerosis: chitotriosidase and human cartilage gp-39 expressed in lesion macrophages. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999; 19: 687694.
16. Adams HP Jr, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, Marsh EE 3rd. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke: definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST: Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke. 1993; 24: 3541.
17. Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988; 16: 1215.
18. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of the low density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972; 18: 499509.[Abstract]
19. Marcovina SM, Albers JJ, Scanu AM, Kennedy H, Giaculli F, Berg K, Couderc R, Dati F, Rifai N, Sakurabayashi I, Tate JR, Steinmetz A. Use of a reference material proposed by the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine to evaluate analytical methods for the determination of plasma lipoprotein (a). Clin Chem. 2000; 46: 19561967.
20. Schwartz SW, Chambless LE, Baker WH, Broderick JP, Howard G. Consistency of Doppler parameters in predicting arteriographically confirmed carotid stenosis: Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study Investigators. Stroke. 1997; 28: 343347.
21. De Bray JM, Glatt B. Quantification of atheromatous stenosis in the extracranial internal carotid artery. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1995; 5: 414442.[CrossRef]
22. Protocol for the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation. Circulation. 1991; 84 (suppl V): V-1V-27.
23. Jeckins PJ, Harper RW, Nestel PJ. Severity of coronary atherosclerosis related to lipoprotein concentration. BMJ. 1978; 2: 388391.
24. Reardon MF, Nestel PJ, Graig IH, Harper RW. Lipoprotein predictors of the severity of coronary artery disease in men and women. Circulation. 1985; 71: 881888.
25. Chen I, Chester MR, Redwood S, Huang J, Leatham EW, Kaski JC. Rapid angiographic disease progression in patients with stabilized unstable angina. Circulation. 1995; 91: 23192324.
26. Sullivan DR, Marwick TH, Freedman SB. A new method of scoring coronary angiograms to reflect extent of coronary atherosclerosis and improve correlation with major risk factors. Am Heart J. 1990; 119: 12621267.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Budde T, Fechtrup C, Bosenberg E, Vielhauer C, Enbergs A, Schulte H, Assmann G, Breithardt G. Plasma Lp(a) levels correlate with number, severity and length-extension of coronary lesions in male patients undergoing coronary arteriography for clinically suspected coronary atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994; 14: 17301736.
28. Roberts WL, Sedrick R, Moulton L, Spencer A, Rifai N. Evaluation of four automated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein methods: implications for clinical and epidemiological applications. Clin Chem. 2000; 46: 461468.
29. Ryder RE, Hayes TM, Mulligan IP, Kingswood JC, Williams S, Owens DR. How soon after myocardial infarction should plasma lipid values be assessed? BMJ. 1984; 289: 16511653.
30. Kannel WB, Castelli WP, Gordon T, McNamara PM. Serum cholesterol, lipoproteins, and the risk of coronary heart disease: the Framingham study. Ann Intern Med. 1971; 74: 112.
31. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group. Multiple risk factor intervention trial: risk factor changes and mortality results. JAMA. 1982; 248: 14651477.
32. Pocoví M, Cenarro A, Civeira F, Torralba MA, Pérez-Calvo JI, Mozas P, Giraldo P, Giralt M, Myers RH, Cupples LA, Ordovás JM. ß-glucocerebrosidase gene locus as a link for Gauchers disease and familial hypo-
-lipoproteinaemia. Lancet. 1998; 351: 19191923.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Cenarro A, Pocoví M, Giraldo P, García-Otín AL, Ordovás JM. Plasma lipoprotein responses to enzyme-replacement in Gauchers disease. Lancet. 1999; 353: 642643.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Giraldo P, Cenarro A, Alfonso P, Pérez-Calvo JI, Rubio-Félix D, Giralt M, Pocoví M. Chitotriosidase genotype and plasma activity in patients with type 1 Gauchers disease and their relatives (carriers and non-carriers). Haematologica. 2001; 86: 977984.
35. Canudas J, Cenarro A, Civeira F, García-Otín AL, Arístegui R, Díaz C, Masramon X, Sol JM, Hernández G, Pocoví M. Chitotriosidase genotype and serum activity in subjects with combined hyperlipidemia: effect of the lipid-lowering agents, atorvastatin and bezafibrate. Metabolism. 2001; 50: 447450.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Gómez-Gerique JA, Ros E, Oliván J, Mostaza JM, Vilardell M, Pintó X, Civeira F, Hernández A, da Silva PM, Rodríguez-Botaro A, Zambón D, Lima J, Díaz C, Arístegui R, Sol JM, Chaves J, Hernández G, for the ATOMIX Investigators. Effect of atorvastatin and benzafibrate on plasma levels of C-reactive protein in combined (mixed) hyperlipemia. Atherosclerosis. 2002; 162: 245251.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Wilterdink JL, Furie KL, Easton JD. Cardiac evaluation of stroke patients. Neurology. 1998; 51 (suppl XIII): 2326.
38. Nadareishvili ZG, Rothwell PM, Beletsky V, Pagniello A, Norris JW. Long-term risk of stroke and other vascular events in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Arch Neurol. 2002; 59: 11621166.
39. Young JL, Libby P, Schonbeck U. Cytokines in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Thromb Haemost. 2002; 88: 554567.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Blake GJ, Ridker PM. Inflammatory bio-markers and cardiovascular risk prediction. J Intern Med. 2002; 252: 283294.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Nieto FJ. Infections and atherosclerosis: new clues from and old hypothesis? Am J Epidemiol. 1998; 148: 937948.
42. Libby P, Ridker PM, Maseri A. Inflammation and atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2002; 105: 11351143.
43. Moreno PR, Falk E, Palacios IF, Newell JB, Fuster V, Fallon JT. Macrophage infiltration in acute coronary syndromes: implications for plaque rupture. Circulation. 1994; 90: 775778.
44. Boot RG, Blommaart EFC, Swart E, van der Vlugt KG, Bijl N, Moe C, Place A, Aerts JMFG. Identification of a novel acidic mammalian chitinase distinct from chitotriosidase. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 67706778.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Pappalardo, S. Musumeci, and S. Motta Modeling immune system control of atherogenesis Bioinformatics, August 1, 2008; 24(15): 1715 - 1721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Sotgiu, R Barone, G Arru, M L Fois, M Pugliatti, A Sanna, G Rosati, and S Musumeci Intrathecal chitotriosidase and the outcome of multiple sclerosis Multiple Sclerosis, September 1, 2006; 12(5): 551 - 557. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L Malaguarnera, M Di Rosa, A M Zambito, N dell'Ombra, F Nicoletti, and M Malaguarnera Chitotriosidase gene expression in Kupffer cells from patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease Gut, September 1, 2006; 55(9): 1313 - 1320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Anderson Candidate-based proteomics in the search for biomarkers of cardiovascular disease J. Physiol., February 15, 2005; 563(1): 23 - 60. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Fach, L.-A. Garulacan, J. Gao, Q. Xiao, S. M. Storm, Y. P. Dubaquie, S. A. Hefta, and G. J. Opiteck In Vitro Biomarker Discovery for Atherosclerosis by Proteomics Mol. Cell. Proteomics, December 1, 2004; 3(12): 1200 - 1210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |