| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atherosclerosis and Lipoproteins |
From Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (T.H., C.D., M.J.C., J.T.,), INSERM Unit 551, Dyslipemias and Atherosclerosis: Genetics, Metabolism and Therapeutics, Hôpital de la Pitié, Paris, France; Genome Sciences Department (V.A., E.L.G., E.M.R.), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, Calif; and CV Therapeutics (R.M.L.), Palo Alto, Calif.
Correspondence to Thierry Huby, INSERM Unit 551, Hôpital de la Pitié, Pavillon Benjamin Delessert, 83 Boulevard de lHôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France. E-mail thuby{at}infobiogen.fr
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results To examine the function of the ACR in its natural genomic context, we used the Cre-loxP recombination system to generate 2 nearly identical apo(a)yeast artificial chromosome transgenic mouse lines that possess a single integration site for the human apo(a) transgene in the mouse genome but differ by the presence or absence of the ACR enhancer. Analysis of the 2 groups of animals revealed that the deletion of the ACR was associated with 30% reduction in plasma and mRNA apo(a) levels. Apo(a)yeast artificial chromosome transgenic mice with and without the ACR sequence were similar in all other aspects of apo(a) regulation, including liver-specific apo(a) expression and alteration in expression levels in response to sexual maturation and a high-fat diet.
Conclusions This study provides the first experimental in vivo evidence for a functional role of the ACR enhancer in determining levels of apo(a) expression.
Key Words: apolipoprotein(a) gene expression enhancer yeast artificial chromosome transgenic mice
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The plasma concentration of Lp(a) is an inherited quantitative trait and remains fairly constant throughout life in a given individual. Nevertheless, Lp(a) levels may differ over a thousand-fold range between individuals. The apo(a) gene is the major determinant of lipoprotein(a) concentration. It has been estimated that the apo(a) gene locus explain from 74% to more than 90% of the intraindividual variability in Lp(a) levels in the white population.5,6 The size polymorphism of apo(a) affects apo(a) protein processing7 and clearly accounts for a significant portion of the total variability in Lp(a) levels seen in human populations.5,8,9 However, other cis-sequences that influence apo(a) expression are also believed to contribute to variance in plasma Lp(a) levels.1012
In addition to humans, the apo(a) gene is naturally present only in Old World monkeys and the hedgehog. Because of the paucity of model organisms with an apo(a) orthologue, the regulation of apo(a) synthesis has been difficult to assess in vivo. Yeast artificial chromosome (YAC) genomic clones carrying human apo(a) alleles with significant 5' and 3' human flanking DNA have been used to generate transgenic mouse lines.13,14 These transgenic mice, expressing apo(a) in an appropriate liver-specific manner, have provided information regarding the regulation of apo(a) mRNA synthesis most notably by the effect on its expression of ovarian sex steroid hormones15 and growth hormone.16 The transcriptional control elements that participate in basal apo(a) expression and in the above regulatory processes are yet to be characterized.
Functional analysis of the plasminogen apo(a) intergenic 40-kb sequence has revealed the presence of 2 candidate regions that possess enhancer activities in transient transfection assays.17,18 These regions coincide with liver-specific DNase Ihypersensitive sites (DHII and DHIII) characterized previously and suggest that they likely correspond to open chromatin domains accessible to nuclear transcription factors. The DHII region is located approximately 26 kb away from the apo(a) promoter, and its activity is repressed in vitro by estrogen, suggesting that it may correspond to the cis-regulatory element mediating estrogen-dependent repression of apo(a) expression.19 The DHIII core element, also called the apo(a) transcription control region (ACR), exhibits the highest stimulating activity (10- to 15-fold) of the 2 enhancers when ligated to the apo(a) proximal promoter. Of note is the observation that the ACR is located within the 5' untranslated region of a line 1 retrotransposon element, nearly 20 kb upstream of the transcription start site of the apo(a) gene.
To evaluate the functional role of the ACR enhancer in its natural genomic context, we created 2 mouse lines containing a 270-kb human apo(a) transgene that differs only by the presence or the absence of the ACR element. Analysis of apo(a) expression in these animals suggests that whereas the targeted deletion of the ACR sequence in apo(a) transgenic mice does not affect various aspects of the regulation of the apo(a) gene, it does impact basal apo(a) plasma levels. These findings provide the first experimental evidence that the ACR actively participates in apo(a) gene expression in vivo.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Generation of Transgenic Mice
Two positive ES clones containing the apo(a)-YAC were injected into C57BL/6J blastocysts, which were implanted into recipient females. Chimeric mice were obtained and mated with C57BL/6J mice. Germ line transmission was evaluated in the F1 agouti progeny by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. Plasma from PCR-tested positive animals were subjected to immunoblot analysis using a polyclonal anti-apo(a) antibody to evaluate apo(a) production. MMTV-Cre transgenic mice (>95% FVB genetic background) were bred with apo(a) transgenic mice to produce littermate mice of the desired genotypes used in this study. Genotyping of the animals for the MMTV-Cre transgene was done by PCR using the primer pair Cre-F (5'-GGTCGATGCAACGAGTGATG) and Cre-R (5'-CAGCATTGCTGTCACTTGGTC) (293 bp). The animals were housed in a conventional animal facility on a 6 AM to 6 PM dark/light cycle. They were weaned at 21 days and fed ad libitum a normal mouse chow diet (Purina No. 5001). For the high-fat diet experiment, 14- to 20-week-old female transgenic mice were placed on a Western-type diet consisting of 1.25% cholesterol, 0.5% cholic acid, and 15% fat for 2 weeks. Plasma samples were collected before and after the diet.
RNA Preparation and Reverse TranscriptionPCR Methods
Please see the expanded Methods section, available online at http://atvb.ahajournals.org.
Immunoblotting and Quantification of Plasma apo(a)
Blood samples were collected in heparinized capillary tubes from the retro-orbital sinus at the specified age and centrifuged, and plasma was stored at -80°C. Samples were electrophoresed on 4.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel under reducing conditions. Proteins were subsequently transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Hybond ECL, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for Western blot analysis using a peroxidase-conjugated sheep polyclonal anti-apo(a) antibody.20 The revelation was performed by chemiluminescence using Hyperfilm ECL (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for signal capture. Deviation from a linear response of the film to the emitted signal intensity was controlled for by using low film exposures. Films were digitized with a desktop scanner, and densitometry was performed with the image processing and analysis program Scion image. For normalization and quantification purposes, a pool of plasma collected from several apo(a) transgenic mice was included in all Western blots. The apo(a) concentration of the plasma pool was determined by densitometric analysis of a Western blot loaded with known quantities of a purified recombinant apo(a)21 along with the pool. The presence of aliquots of the plasma pool in all Western blots allowed the conversion of the measured peak areas into apo(a) quantities. For each plasma sample, at least 3 independent Western blot experiments were performed to calculate a mean value±SD. This normalization and quantification procedure gave a mean interassay CV of 29% calculated on the basis of all Western blots performed. The mean CV calculated on intraassays without normalizing to the pool was 17%. One animal exhibiting an atypical apo(a) plasma level relative to the other members of its group [value above the mean apo(a) level plus 3xSD] was considered as an outlier and excluded from the study. At the indicated time points, apo(a) plasma levels between groups of mice were compared using Students t test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Apo(a) Transgene Tissue Expression
Although small amounts of apo(a) mRNA were detected in testes and brain of rhesus monkeys, the liver is the major site of apo(a) synthesis in humans and Old World monkeys.26,27 To investigate whether deletion of the ACR could affect the tissue specificity of apo(a) mRNA synthesis, we examined the tissue distribution of apo(a) expression in apo(a) and apo(a)/ACRdel tg mice by subjecting total RNA preparations from several tissues (adrenal, kidney, heart, spleen, brain, and liver) to reverse transcription (RT)-PCR analysis (Figure 2). Apo(a) mRNA was detected only in the liver for the various lines of mice independent of whether their apo(a) transgene contained the ACR.
|
Apo(a) Expression Levels
Apo(a) plasma levels in transgenic mice were determined by densitometric analysis of immunoblots performed with a polyclonal anti-apo(a) antibody. Plasmas of apo(a) and apo(a)/ACRdel mice were analyzed at different time points over an 8-week period (Figure 3). Although male and female mice exhibited similar levels at the 28-day time point (compare band intensities against the pool lane in Figure 3), apo(a) expression decreased after 4 weeks of age in male mice containing both apo(a) and apo(a)/ACRdel transgenes. This decrease associated with the sexual maturation of the animals has been previously reported in transgenic mice carrying the same apo(a)-YAC transgene clone 13 as well as in another line of transgenic mice containing a different human apo(a) genomic transgene.14 Such a reduction in plasma apo(a) levels has been previously shown to associate with decreases in expression of the human apo(a) transgene. In contrast, we observed a 2- to 3-fold increase of plasma levels of apo(a) after 4 weeks in female mice.
|
To evaluate whether the deletion of the ACR influenced the level of apo(a) synthesis, we compared apo(a) plasma concentrations in apo(a) and apo(a)/ACRdel littermate mice (Figure 4A). In young animals (28-day time point), there was a clear interindividual variability (2- to 3-fold) in the plasma levels of apo(a) in female and male mice for both genotypes. It is noteworthy that similar variability was also observed in the other apo(a)-YAC transgenic line developed by Acquati et al.14 The mean apo(a) level in female mice containing the apo(a)/ACRdel transgene was some 30% (P=0.01) lower than that in female mice containing an intact apo(a) transgene (1.4±0.5 versus 2.0±0.8 µg/mL, respectively). After sexual maturity (day 84), apo(a) concentration varied noticeably between individuals among the 2 groups of female mice. Similarly to day 28, a statistically significant decrease (27%; P=0.04) in mean plasma apo(a) level was noted in female mice containing an apo(a)/ACRdel transgene compared with those containing an intact apo(a) transgene (4.0±2.0 versus 5.5±2.0 µg/mL, respectively). Likewise, comparison of the amounts of hepatic apo(a) mRNA between both genotypes using real-time quantitative RT-PCR revealed the same decrease as that seen by comparing plasma apo(a) protein concentrations (Figure 4B). These results provide good support for a role of the ACR in determining the level of apo(a) gene expression and thereby apo(a) plasma levels. Assessing the impact of deleting the ACR from the apo(a) transgene was more complicated in male mice because of diminished expression of apo(a) as the males aged. Because of the extremely low concentrations of apo(a) in postpubertal males, the comparison of apo(a) levels could not be performed after puberty. In young apo(a) transgenic males, the loss of the ACR element was associated with a 21% reduction in apo(a) plasma levels, a difference that did not quite achieve statistical significance (Figure 4A).
|
Changes in apo(a) Expression After a High-Fat Diet
Cholesterol- and cholate-containing high-fat diet has previously been demonstrated to affect apo(a) mRNA levels in apo(a) transgenic mice.14 To address the role of the ACR enhancer in this transcriptional regulation of apo(a) expression, adult apo(a) and apo(a)/ACRdel female mice (n=4 in each group) were fed a Western-type diet for 2 weeks. As illustrated in Figure 5A, whereas apo(a) plasma concentrations in both groups of mice before the diet were in the same range as those observed at 84 days (Figure 4), a marked decrease (
3-fold) in the plasma levels of apo(a) was clearly observed after the Western diet. However, densitometric analyses of the Western blots indicated a similar reduction in the apo(a) plasma concentrations in either apo(a) tg or apo(a)/ACRdel tg mice. Comparison of hepatic apo(a) mRNA levels from female mice fed a chow or the high-fat diet showed that, as previously reported,14 the pronounced fall in apo(a) plasma levels in mice receiving the high-fat diet was associated with a similar reduction in apo(a) mRNA levels (Figure 5B). Interestingly, despite this important decline in the amount of apo(a) transcript after the high-fat diet, the apo(a)/ACRdel tg mice still displayed an approximately 30% decrease in apo(a) mRNA levels compared with apo(a) tg mice (Figure 5B).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To date, 2 apo(a)-YAC clones, including the one used in this study, have successfully been used to create transgenic mice, and both constructs exhibit liver-specific expression of the human apo(a) transgene.13,14 In this study, we observed a similar restricted tissue specificity of apo(a) expression in mice both with and without the ACR element. It is important to note that in the earlier description13 of the 4 separate lines of transgenic mice carrying a single copy of the same apo(a)-YAC that we used, a large range of apo(a) plasma concentrations (1 to 75 mg/dL) was detected, the transgenic line generated in the present study being in the lower expression range. These data suggest that the important cis-acting elements providing liver-specific apo(a) gene transcription are present in the YAC clone; however, this region of genomic DNA is likely to some extent to be subject to chromosomal site integration effect that can influence apo(a) transgene expression. This problem was largely circumvented in the present comparative study, because the apo(a) and apo(a)/ACRdel transgenes mapped to the exact same genomic location being derived from the same transgenic line.
Several studies have suggested that deletion of individual regulatory elements/enhancers that are part of a locus control region (LCR) may not necessarily result in marked reduction in gene expression, because, at least partially, functionally redundant elements may be present and may compensate for the loss of activity.24,28 Of particular relevance have been studies describing the ß-globin LCR that consists of several DNase Ihypersensitive chromatin domains spread over a region of 20 to 30 kb.29 Targeted deletions of murine 5'HS2 or HS3 sites that demonstrated important LCR activities when tested individually in various expression assays caused only a 30% reduction of murine globin gene expression.30,31 Likewise, in our study, apo(a) plasma levels were only moderately altered on deletion of the ACR in vivo, whereas in vitro the enhancer exhibited robust stimulation of apo(a) promoter activity.17,18 We cannot exclude, however, the possibility that integration site-specific silencing effects may have dampened the ACR activity or that the presence of other functional LCR activities contribute along with the ACR element to general transcriptional activation at the apo(a) genomic locus. Notably, in the 40-kb intergenic region that separates the 5' regions of the apo(a) and plasminogen genes, 3 other DNase Ihypersensitive sites are present,32 including the apo(a) enhancer DHII19; these regions represent important candidate regions. Recent findings have also suggested that elements that lie outside the 5' region of the apo(a) gene may also be required for its expression.14
The ACR region colocalizes with a DNase Ihypersensitive site that was initially identified exclusively in hepatoma cell types in vitro32 and in vivo in the liver of apo(a)-YAC transgenic mice.18 Although these observations may indicate that the ACR acts as a hepatic control region of apo(a) expression, in vitro the enhancer does not exhibit tissue specificity.17,18 Besides, ACR enhancer function depends on the Ets and Sp1 transcription factors that are ubiquitously expressed. Taken together, these findings indicate that the ACR is not likely to contribute to the liver-restricted expression of apo(a). The absence of ectopic expression of the apo(a) transgene in apo(a)/ACRdel observed in this study is consistent with the latter hypothesis.
Apo(a)-YAC transgenic mice constitute a valuable model in which to assess the regulation of the human apo(a) gene. However, major differences in apo(a) expression have clearly been observed in this model compared with that seen in humans. For example, marked decrease in apo(a) levels occurs when the animals are fed a high-fat diet14; by contrast, variation in the type of dietary fat consumed is associated with none to only moderate variations in Lp(a) levels in humans.33,34 The profound reduction in apo(a) mRNA levels previously reported in male apo(a) tg mice during puberty13 is equally not observed in humans. The results of the present study exclude the possibility that such apo(a) transcriptional regulation in mice is mediated through the ACR element, because apo(a) and apo(a)/ACRdel tg behaved similarly with respect to these effects. The understanding of such regulations in apo(a) tg mice may, however, shed light on metabolic pathways that influence Lp(a) levels in humans. Recently, it has been demonstrated that the fall in apo(a) serum levels associated with puberty in apo(a)-YAC transgenic males is determined by the secretory pattern of growth hormone (GH) in mice; this pattern is distinct from that in females, which results in a sexually dimorphic regulation of apo(a) expression.16 Indeed, the latter study offered insights into the mechanisms responsible for the GH-associated increase in plasma levels of Lp(a) observed in humans35 by revealing that GH regulates apo(a) expression. However, it is noteworthy that the sex-specific pattern of apo(a) expression in adult apo(a) tg mouse liver that we presently observed was distinct [apo(a) plasma levels decreased in males during puberty but increased in females] from that previously reported in apo(a)-YAC transgenic lines. Differences in genetic background between transgenic lines in the expression of GH-dependent transcription factors that modulate apo(a) transcription, and that remain to be identified, may account for this finding.
Investigation of the regulation of the expression of genes for which there is no murine orthologue in transgenic mice is beset with problems of relevance, as in the case of apo(a), for which there is a paucity of alternative experimental in vivo systems. Nonetheless, our present findings have demonstrated the impact of targeted deletion of the ACR on apo(a) expression levels in an in vivo model; moreover, such in vivo data are consistent with earlier in vitro results. Finally, the large interindividual variability in Lp(a) concentrations observed in human populations is thought to result in a large part from the combined action of multiple factors that govern apo(a) levels.36 From the experimental data presented here and from a recent study in which associations between sequence variations in the ACR enhancer and plasma Lp(a) concentrations were reported in human subjects,37 the ACR sequence may appear as one of these functional regulatory elements that warrants additional analysis.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received February 25, 2003; accepted May 15, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. C. Petersen, J. Lazar, H. J. Jacob, and T. Wakatsuki Tissue engineering: a new frontier in physiological genomics Physiol Genomics, December 19, 2007; 32(1): 28 - 32. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |