| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ATVB in Focus |
From the Blood Research Institute, The Blood Center of Southeastern Wisconsin (P.J.N., D.K.N.), and the Departments of Pharmacology (P.J.N.), Cellular Biology (P.J.N.), and Microbiology (D.K.N.) and Cardiovascular Center (P.J.N.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis.
Correspondence to Peter J. Newman, Blood Research Institute, The Blood Center of Southeastern Wisconsin, PO Box 2178, 638 N. 18th St, Milwaukee, WI 53201. E-mail pjnewman{at}bcsew.edu
Series Editor: Lawrence Brass
ATVB In Focus Platelet Activation and the Formation of the Platelet Plug
Previous Brief Reviews in this Series:
Tsai H-M. Deficiency of ADAMTS13 causes thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. 2003;23:388396.
Quinn MJ, Byzova TV, Qin J, Topol EJ, Plow EF. Integrin
IIbß3 and its antagonism. 2003;23:945952.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: PECAM-1 signal transduction ITIM SHP-2 alternative splicing
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Structure of PECAM-1 and Its Cytoplasmic Domain |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The cytoplasmic domain of PECAM-1 is complex22 (see Figure 1) and is encoded by 8 short exons that are differentially susceptible to alternative splicing, resulting in generation of mRNA species that encode distinct PECAM-1 isoforms (see Table 1). These species include a transmembraneless, soluble form of PECAM-1 lacking exon 9 that is produced by human umbilical vein endothelial cells and secreted into plasma23 as well as numerous other variants that lack 1 or more cytoplasmic domain exons.22,2431 Although the existence of few of these PECAM-1 species have been demonstrated at the protein level, several of them (indicated with an asterisk in Table 1) represent relatively abundant mRNA species. Interestingly, whereas exons 1 to 9, 11 to 14, and 16 are all phase 1 exons,22 cytoplasmic domainencoding exons 10 and 15 are phase 2 and phase 0, respectively, and their removal results in PECAM-1 mRNA species encoding isoforms with a C-terminus that is shorter and has a different amino acid sequence (
, Figure 1). Although no variants lacking exon 10 have been found to date, there are at least 3 different PECAM-1 mRNAs missing exon 15, including 2 very abundant species (
15 and
14,15) present, for example, in the inner cell mass of mouse blastulas.29 As shown, these 2 PECAM-1 isoforms end with a different sequence, E-N-G-R-L-P, than does full-length PECAM-1. The biologic consequence of this variation is not known.
|
|
Tyrosine Phosphorylation of the PECAM-1 Cytoplasmic Domain
Regulated phosphorylation of both serine and tyrosine residues occurs within the PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain in response to numerous forms of cellular stimulation. As is the case with cytoplasmic domains of other plasma membrane receptors, PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain phosphorylation regulates assembly of signaling complexes and, in some cases, interactions with various elements of the cytoskeleton.
PECAM-1 can become tyrosine phosphorylated in nearly all vascular cells in which it is expressed. Although low levels of constitutive PECAM-1 tyrosine phosphorylation have been reported in platelets32 and endothelial cells,33 PECAM-1 is generally not found to be tyrosine phosphorylated in cells maintained in a resting state. PECAM-1 tyrosine phosphorylation has been detected in stirred platelets,34 in platelets exposed to pervanadate32 or wheat germ agglutinin,35 and in platelets induced to aggregate via receptors for collagen3436 or thrombin.32,34,35,37,38 Cross-linking of platelet PECAM-1 itself also results in its tyrosine phosphorylation.36,39,40 In endothelial cells, PECAM-1 tyrosine phosphorylation can be induced by mechanical force applied directly to PECAM-1,41 on adhesion to immobilized PECAM-1,42 fibronectin,42 or collagen,33 or on exposure to wheat germ agglutinin,35 fluid shear stress, or osmotic shock.41,43,44 When it has been compared, the level of PECAM-1 tyrosine phosphorylation seems to be decreased in migrating (or nonconfluent) endothelial cells.33,41 PECAM-1 tyrosine phosphorylation has also been observed in T lymphocytes on cross-linking of PECAM-145 or the T cell antigen receptor45,46 and in RBL-2H3 mast-like cells on adherence to fibronectin46 or on cross-linking of the IgE receptor, Fc
RI.47 However, not all stimuli induce tyrosine phosphorylation of PECAM-1, because exposure of endothelial cells to agents that induce membrane lipid hydrolysis or calcium mobilization does not result in tyrosine phosphorylation of PECAM-1,43 nor does exposure of RBL-2H3 cells to the protein kinase C (PKC) agonist phorbol myristate acetate.47
Because PECAM-1 does not possess intrinsic kinase activity, the identity of tyrosine kinases able to phosphorylate PECAM-1 has been the subject of extensive investigation. A fairly large body of evidence obtained from coprecipitation,34,35 in vitro kinase,48,49 and overexpression50 studies supports a role for Src family kinases in PECAM-1 tyrosine phosphorylation. The extent to which individual Src family kinases are redundant in their ability to phosphorylate PECAM-1 may, however, depend on the array of Src kinases that a given cell expresses and the activation conditions to which that cell is exposed.34,51 Inhibition of PECAM-1 tyrosine phosphorylation by Src family kinase inhibitors is reported to be more or less complete, suggesting that a non-Src family tyrosine kinase may also be able to phosphorylate PECAM-1.34,35,41 Candidates include members of the Csk50 and Syk47 families of protein tyrosine kinases, although the latter remains controversial.50,51 It remains to be determined whether, under physiological conditions, PECAM-1 is phosphorylated by both Src and non-Src family tyrosine kinases, how the cell type and its environment influence the activation states of enzymes able to phosphorylate PECAM-1, and whether the tyrosine kinases able to phosphorylate PECAM-1 are dependent on each others activity.
The sequence of PECAM-1 cDNA has been determined from 6 species, including human,6 mouse,52 cow,43,53 pig (Genbank accession No. X98505), rat, and dog (unpublished data, 1996). Tyrosine residues are perfectly conserved at positions corresponding to human residues 596, 636, 663, and 686 (yellow-filled circles in Figure 1). Incompletely conserved tyrosine residues include those at positions 638 (histidine in humans, tyrosine in all others), 674 (histidine in all species except dogs), and 701 (phenylalanine in rats). A mutant form of human PECAM-1 in which the tyrosine residues at positions 663 and 686 were replaced with phenylalanine (Y663,686F) failed to become tyrosine phosphorylated in transfected HEK293 cells exposed to pervanadate, revealing that, at least under these conditions, Y663 and Y686 are the sole tyrosine phosphorylation sites in human PECAM-1.54 However, a homologous mutant form of murine PECAM-1 could become tyrosine phosphorylated on overexpression of the Src family kinase p56lck in COS-1 cells.50 Although the tyrosine phosphorylation of Y663,686F PECAM-1 in those cells may have resulted from overexpression of p56lck, it is also possible that COS-1, but not HEK293, cells contain a kinase that can phosphorylate PECAM-1 on tyrosines other than Y663 and Y686, or that mouse PECAM-1 becomes phosphorylated at a site (possibly Tyr638) not present in human PECAM-1.50 Interestingly, Y663 is much less efficiently phosphorylated by either Src or Csk kinases than is Y686,43,50 suggesting that its phosphorylation may be a rate-limiting step in PECAM-1mediated signal transduction. The identity of the kinases or conditions required for efficient phosphorylation of Y663, therefore, remain important areas of investigation.
Cytoplasmic Proteins That Bind Tyrosine Phosphorylated PECAM-1
The best-characterized structural feature of the PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain is the presence of 2 distinct immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motifs (ITIMs) centered around Y663 and Y686, respectively, and it is the presence of the paired ITIM within the PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain that led several years ago to its assignment to the Ig-ITIM family of inhibitory receptors.55 Like other members of the Ig-ITIM family, PECAM-1, when tyrosine phosphorylated, is able to recruit Src homology 2 (SH2) domaincontaining signaling proteins, which then can initiate signaling pathways, many of which remain to be defined. Proteins reported to be able to associate with the PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain are summarized in Table 2; however, it is important to recognize that the extent to which these potential binding partners interact with PECAM-1 is likely to be influenced by their relative local concentrations, their relative binding affinities, and the effect of additional posttranslational modifications of the PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain.56
|
The protein most commonly reported to interact with the PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain is the SH2 domaincontaining protein-tyrosine phosphatase, SHP-2. It is widely accepted that phosphorylation of the PECAM-1 ITIM tyrosine residues results in both recruitment and activation of SHP-2.37,41,45,46,48,50,54,5759 Interestingly, in a completely unbiased approach, a bait GST fusion protein containing the tandem SH2 domains of SHP-2 exclusively bound a peptide comprised of PECAM-1 residues 617 to 711 (ie, containing its dual ITIM), when tyrosine-phosphorylated, out of an entire phage display cDNA library.60 The PECAM-1/SHP-2 interaction in cells requires PECAM-1 tyrosine phosphorylation at both positions 663 and 686.50,54 However, in vitro binding studies using the individual SH2 domains of SHP-2 have shown that the N-terminal SH2 domain interacts with high affinity with the N-terminal ITIM of PECAM-1,54,58 whereas the C-terminal SH2 domain of SHP-2 preferentially interacts, albeit with lower affinity, with pY686-containing PECAM-1 phosphopeptide.54 It is possible that the high affinity interaction between the N-terminal SH2 domain of SHP-2 and the pY663-containing ITIM of PECAM-1 may compensate for the inefficiency with which Y663 is phosphorylated under physiological conditions (see above). Furthermore, the level of PECAM-1 tyrosine phosphorylation seems to be enhanced when PECAM-1 is expressed along with a dominant-negative form of SHP-2, suggesting that PECAM-1 is an SHP-2 substrate and that the extent of PECAM-1/SHP-2 complex formation may be regulated by PECAM-1 dephosphorylation mediated by bound SHP-2.50
In contrast with numerous reports documenting PECAM-1/SHP-2 interactions, there are conflicting data concerning interactions between PECAM-1 and the SHP-2related phosphatase, SHP-1, which has also been shown to associate with PECAM-1, albeit in much lesser amounts than does SHP-2.46,50,5759 As with SHP-2, both PECAM-1 ITIMs seem to be required to support SHP-1 binding50; however, unlike SHP-2, the affinity between SHP-1 and pY663 is identical to that of pY686, and the affinities of both interactions are significantly lower than those reported for SHP-2.57 In fact, one study was unable to detect an interaction of the individual SH2 domains of SHP-1 with either PECAM-1 phosphopeptide.58 Thus, the functional relevance of the PECAM-1/SHP-1 interaction remains controversial.
Several other SH2 domaincontaining proteins have been evaluated for their ability to associate with PECAM-1, including selected members of the Src family,43,48,49 the 5'-inositol phosphatase, SHIP,58 and PLC
1,58,59 although the latter association is controversial.48 Interestingly, the SH2 domain of SHIP is similar to that present in an adaptor protein known as SAP (SLAM-associated protein), both of which seem to interact preferentially with a unique type of ITIM that has been termed an ITSM.61 SAP binding sites are characterized by the presence of a T or S residue at position -2 relative to the ITIM phosphotyrosine.62 Because the C-terminal ITIM of PECAM-1 contains a T at the -2 position of Y686 (Figure 1), it may be able to bind SAP (Kim Nichols, University of Pennsylvania, unpublished observations, 2002), although the biological conditions under which PECAM-1 and SAP might interact in intact cells are presently not known.
PECAM-1 immunoprecipitates have been shown to contain several phosphoproteins of unknown identity,34,42,49,54,57 and it is likely that some of these associate with the PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain indirectly or in an ITIM-independent manner. Signal transducers and activators of transcription 3 and 5 likely represent the best known examples of ITIM-independent binding, because their interaction with PECAM-1 seems to require PECAM-1 Y701 but not ITIM residues Y663 or Y686.63 Phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase, on the other hand, may be an example of a signaling molecule that interacts indirectly with PECAM-1, because it could be detected in antiPECAM-1 mAb-coated microwells incubated with whole neutrophil lysates64 but was not found associated with PECAM-1 in direct binding studies.48,58 The adaptor molecules Grb2 and Gab1 also may interact with tyrosine-phosphorylated PECAM-1 in an indirect manner. Although evidence for an association between PECAM-1 and Grb2 is conflicting,46,58 Gab1 has been shown to colocalize with PECAM-1 and SHP-2 at endothelial cell borders after exposure to fluid shear stress.41 Immunoprecipitation experiments, however, were unable to demonstrate direct binding of Gab1 to PECAM-1.41 Because both Grb265,66 and Gab167 can bind directly to tyrosine-phosphorylated SHP-2, it is possible that PECAM-1/SHP-2/Gab1 and PECAM-1/SHP-2/Grb2 ternary signaling complexes may form in response to certain forms of cellular stimulation. The relevance of these interactions in regulating PECAM-1mediated cell adhesion, activation, and survival represent an important area of future investigation.
Serine Phosphorylation of the PECAM-1 Cytoplasmic Domain
PECAM-1 serine, but not threonine, residues have been shown to be phosphorylated in resting platelets and endothelial cells, and the level of serine phosphorylation increases 2- to 3-fold on cellular activation.32,6872 PKC is thought to play a primary role in PECAM-1 serine phosphorylation68,71,73; however, a role for other kinases has been proposed because of the observation that the level of platelet PECAM-1 serine phosphorylation induced by phorbol myristate acetate, which activates only PKC, is lower than that induced by thrombin, which activates PKC and possibly other kinases as well.69 Proposed serine phosphorylation sites in PECAM-1 include S673,73 S620, S670, and S687.43 Although 3 of these (S620, S670, and S687; see orange-filled circles in Figure 1) are well conserved, the sites and consequences of serine phosphorylation within the PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain remain to be determined.
PECAM-1/Cytoskeletal Interactions
There is growing evidence that PECAM-1 associates both physically and functionally with the underlying cytoskeleton. Using the operational definition of detergent insolubility as a measure of cytoskeletal connectedness, it was found more than 10 years ago that, in resting platelets, only
10% of PECAM-1 partitions with the Triton-insoluble cytoskeleton, which is largely composed of F-actin, filamen (ABP-280), and spectrin.69 During thrombin-induced platelet aggregation, however, more than 60% of total cellular PECAM-1 becomes detergent insoluble, indicating that the degree of PECAM-1 association with the Triton-insoluble cytoskeleton depends on the activation state of the cell.69 In support of this notion,
20% to 30% of PECAM-1 was found associated with the cytoskeleton in confluent endothelial cells,73,74 increasing to
65% during cell migration.73
Poggi et al,75 using an NK cell model system, were the first to demonstrate a functional relationship between PECAM-1 and the cytoskeleton when they showed that mAb-induced cross-linking of PECAM-1 on the cell surface could induce cell spreading and cytoskeletal rearrangement. Shortly thereafter, Matsumura et al76 showed that addition to endothelial cells of a combination of VE-cadherinspecific and PECAM-1specific antibodies resulted in reorganization of F-actin filaments into discrete foci. Although less specific than using PECAM-1specific reagents, addition of wheat germ agglutinin, a multivalent lectin that binds to and cross-links PECAM-1 (as well as a host of other cell surface receptors), has also been shown to increase actin assembly at the cell periphery.35 Taken together, it would seem that PECAM-1 is able to bind to and coordinate the assembly of F-actin filaments, especially in association with changes in cell shape or during cell migration.
Although the molecules linking PECAM-1 and the actin cytoskeleton have not been established with certainty, ß-catenin and
-catenin (also known as plakoglobin) seem to be likely candidates. The catenins are scaffolding proteins normally involved in anchoring a class of adherens junctional proteins known as cadherins to the cortical actin cytoskeleton. Although early studies did not find an association between
-, ß-, or
-catenin and PECAM-1,77 Matsumura et al76 found that ß-catenin could be coimmunoprecipitated with PECAM-1 using special cell homogenization conditions that improved the solubility of the underlying membrane skeleton. The authors proposed that a functional adherens junctional complex of PECAM-1/ß-catenin/F-actin, perhaps in conjunction with VE-cadherin, might regulate processes such as endothelial cell tube formation. The finding that antiPECAM-1 antibodies markedly inhibit the ability of endothelial cells to organize and form 3-dimensional networks in Matrigel78 also support this concept. Ilan et al79 went on to characterize the molecular requirements for PECAM-1/ß-catenin complex formation, which include tyrosine phosphorylation of ß-catenin. This interaction seems to be ITIM-independent, because tyrosine-phosphorylated ß-catenin bound similarly to wild-type, Y663F, and Y686F forms of PECAM-1. Because SHP-2 and ß-catenin seemed to bind different sites on the PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain, the authors suggested that SHP-2, when recruited to PECAM-1/ß-catenin complexes, regulates the tyrosine phosphorylation state of ß-catenin. The physiological importance of ß-catenin tyrosine phosphorylation, however, remains to be established. In addition to ß-catenin, PECAM-1 also has been reported to associate with
-catenin.73 The molecular requirements for
-catenin association with PECAM-1 differ from those of ß-catenin, however, because
-catenin does not need to be tyrosine phosphorylated to bind. Interestingly, PKC-mediated serine phosphorylation of the PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain, as might occur early in the platelet activation process or during endothelial cell migration, was found to inhibit PECAM-1/
-catenin interactions. Taken together, these data suggest that dynamic interactions between PECAM-1 and the catenins may be responsible for anchoring PECAM-1 to the cytoskeleton. The relationship between such cytoskeletal connections and the ability of PECAM-1 to regulate integrin activation, endothelial responses to fluid shear stress, protection from phagocytosis, or cell survival (all discussed below) are important issues that remain to be addressed.
ITIM-Mediated Inhibitory Function
By virtue of their ability to recruit and activate protein-tyrosine or inositol phosphatases, ITIM-containing inhibitory receptors are thought to function primarily by counteracting signal transduction pathways initiated by activating receptors that recruit, via their immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activating motifs (ITAMs), protein tyrosine kinases.80 Inhibitory receptors, therefore, raise the threshold for cellular activation and regulate ITAM receptormediated cellular activation events. PECAM-1 is the only known ITIM-containing receptor on human or murine platelets, and, because the most prominent PECAM-1binding protein, SHP-2, is capable of transmitting both stimulatory and inhibitory signals into the cell,81 determining whether PECAM-1 exerts positive or negative regulatory effects has been the subject of much investigation.
The first evidence that PECAM-1 could function as an inhibitory receptor came from studies in which PECAM-1 was artificially forced into proximity with selected activating receptors. This was done by cross-linking antibodies bound to PECAM-1 with antibodies bound to ITAM-containing antigen receptors on lymphocytes. On coligation with the T cell45 or B cell51,59 receptor, PECAM-1 was found to attenuate antigen receptorinduced signaling and cellular responses in a manner that depended on the integrity of the PECAM-1 ITIMs and that either required SHP-251 or preferred SHP-2 over SHP-1.59
Evidence, albeit less direct, for the inhibitory function of PECAM-1 has also been obtained by examining the effects of PECAM-1 cross-linking on collagen-induced platelet activation. Collagen binds to platelets via the integrin
2ß1, but subsequent signal transduction occurs primarily via GPVI, which exists noncovalently associated within the plane of the plasma membrane with the ITAM-bearing FcR
-chain.82 PECAM-1/SHP-2 complexes formed as a result of PECAM-1 cross-linking36,39,40 should, in theory, be able to inhibit signaling by nearby GPVI/FcR
chain complexes. Indeed, several in vitro studies have demonstrated that activation of PECAM-1 via mAb-induced PECAM-1 cross-linking inhibits Ca2+ mobilization,40 granule secretion,40 aggregation,36,40 and thrombus formation36 in collagen-activated platelets. The extent to which PECAM-1 inhibits responses of platelets to agonists that bind to non-ITAMbearing receptors is, however, as yet unclear. One study found that mAb-induced PECAM-1 cross-linking inhibited platelet activation induced by binding of thrombin to the G-proteincoupled receptor, PAR1, which is not thought to be regulated by ITIMs; however, this study did not rule out nonspecific heterologous desensitization as the mechanism of inhibition.40 In another study, the antiPECAM-1 mAb, AAP2, inhibited platelet aggregation induced by all agonists examined, including collagen, ADP, epinephrine, and thrombin; however, this study did not discriminate between inhibition of PECAM-1mediated signaling versus adhesion.83
The notion that PECAM-1 inhibits specifically the action of ITAM-bearing agonist receptors has recently gained support from studies that have had the opportunity to examine blood cell function in PECAM-1deficient mice. Compared with wild-type cells, PECAM-1deficient B cells84 and mast cells85 fail to regulate signaling through the ITAM-bearing B cell receptor and Fc
RI, respectively. Similar hyperactive responses have been observed in PECAM-1deficient platelets, which exhibit enhanced aggregation and granule secretion responses to GPVI/FcR
chainspecific agonists,36,86 whereas PECAM-1 deficiency has no measurable effect on in vitro platelet responses to agonists that bind to G proteincoupled receptors for ADP36,87 or thrombin.36,86 These data suggest that, in vivo, platelet PECAM-1 plays a major role in regulating signaling pathways of ITAM-containing, but not G proteincoupled, receptors. Relative to its regulation of ITAM-mediated cellular activation, however, it is important to note that PECAM-1 inhibitory signaling in platelets can be easily overcome by strong stimulation of the GPVI/FcR
chain collagen receptor.86 Thus, in situations where endothelial damage is severe enough to expose a high concentration of underlying extracellular matrix, PECAM-1 will likely not be able to inhibit platelet thrombus formation. This is a good thing. This concept may explain the discrepancy between the findings of Vollmar et al,88 who found that PECAM-1deficient and wild-type mice did not differ in either the rate or extent of thrombus formation in blood vessels damaged by exposure to laser lightinduced injury to the endothelium, versus those of Rosenblum and colleagues,89,90 who reported that antiPECAM-1 mAbs could inhibit platelet adhesion and aggregation over mildly injured endothelial cell beds. Studies using mild forms of vascular injury in PECAM-1deficient mice might be expected to yield similar results.
As these and other studies in PECAM-1deficient mice begin to emerge, opportunities to resolve several important issues are likely to be realized. First, it is important to determine the extent to which formation of PECAM-1/SHP-2 complexes is required to modulate platelet, B cell, and mast cell activation in vivo. Expression of an ITIM-less form of PECAM-1 in vivo would go a long way toward answering this question. If SHP-2 binding to the PECAM-1 ITIMs is important for the inhibitory activity of PECAM-1 in vivo, specific roles for SHP-2 will have to be resolved. One possibility is that PECAM-1 normally recruits SHP-2 and triggers its phosphatase activity, resulting in dephosphorylation of nearby components of ITAM-dependent signal transduction pathways and diminished cellular responsiveness. In cells expressing an ITIM-less form of PECAM-1, dephosphorylation of signal transduction pathway components would be delayed, resulting in augmented cellular responsiveness. An alternative possibility is that SHP-2 normally functions as a positive adapter or activating protein in growth factor receptor signaling pathways91 from which PECAM-1 sequesters SHP-2 away. ITIM-less PECAM-1 would fail to sequester SHP-2, again resulting in augmented cellular responses. Once the mechanism by which PECAM-1 exerts its inhibitory function is more precisely understood, it may be possible to exploit it to block pathologic cellular activation (eg, to inhibit thrombosis, autoimmunity, or hypersensitivity) or constrain it to enhance desirable cell activation (eg, to control bleeding or overcome immunosuppression).
Integrin Activation
More than 10 years ago, Tanaka et al92 noticed that addition of antiPECAM-1 mAbs to human T lymphocytes enhanced their ability to bind to immobilized ß1 integrin substrates, such as fibronectin and VCAM-1, and proposed that PECAM-1 could act as an integrin-function modulator. Since that time, there have been numerous studies demonstrating that addition of antiPECAM-1 mAbs to the cell surface results in upregulation of ß1,93 ß2,9496 and ß339,97 integrin function, leading to speculation that PECAM-1 engagement might influence diverse integrin-mediated processes, such as thrombosis, cell migration, or transendothelial leukocyte extravasation. Although the precise mechanism by which PECAM-1 modulates integrin function is not known, several clues have begun to emerge. First, PECAM-1mediated integrin activation seems to require an intact PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain and its 2 ITIMs98 and that PECAM-1 be induced to form lateral oligomers within the plane of the plasma membrane.99 What subsequently occurs to effect integrin activation is not clear, but recent studies by Reedquist et al98 suggest that small GTPases may be involved. They found that addition of antiPECAM-1 mAbs to Jurkat T cells selectively activated Rap1, which, together with its exchange factor CalDAG-GEFI, has been increasingly implicated in integrin activation,100,101 perhaps by inducing integrin clustering (avidity modulation) or by inducing conformational changes in the integrin itself (affinity modulation). Support for both of these mechanisms of action, in fact, exists, because Poggi et al75 found that addition of antiPECAM-1 mAbs to human NK cells resulted in actin rearrangements and recruitment of talin, a known integrin-binding102 and -activating103 protein, to membrane ruffles, whereas Varon et al39 found that certain anti-PECAM-1 mAbs, when bound to platelets, induce exposure of ligand-induced binding sites (so-called LIBS epitopes) on the integrin
IIbß3. Future studies using recently developed Rap1-deficient mice may help to clarify the relationships between Rap1 activation and cytoskeletal rearrangements, integrin clustering, and integrin conformational changes in PECAM-1mediated modulation of integrin function.
In addition to affecting integrin activation, PECAM-1 may also regulate integrin trafficking. A recent report by Dangerfield et al104 provides compelling evidence that PECAM-1/PECAM-1 homophilic interactions may be required in vivo for redistributing
6ß1 from neutrophil intracellular granules to the plasma membrane during the process of transendothelial migration,105 thereby facilitating
6ß1-mediated neutrophil migration through the laminin- and collagen-rich perivascular basement membrane. Interestingly, endothelial cell surface PECAM-1 seems to serve as a passive ligand for neutrophil PECAM-1, which after engagement leads to neutrophil signal transduction and subsequent integrin activation.106 The signaling pathway that regulates PECAM-1mediated integrin redistribution remains to be elucidated; however, given the reported ability of PECAM-1 to activate Rap1, it is tempting to speculate that PECAM-1 might similarly be activating 1 or more Rab proteins107related members of the Ras superfamilyto effect integrin-containing granule trafficking and membrane fusion during neutrophil extravasation. A summary of molecular mechanisms by which PECAM-1 might amplify integrin-mediated cell adhesion is shown in Figure 2.
|
Cell Survival
In addition to its role in vascular cell adhesion and signaling, there is growing evidence that PECAM-1 may be able to transduce signals that suppress programmed cell death. In 1999, Noble et al108 reported that PECAM-1/PECAM-1 homophilic interactions between monocytes and endothelial cells reduced apoptotic endothelial cell death after serum deprivation and speculated that PECAM-1 homophilic interactions might lead to the transmission of prosurvival signals. Similar findings have been reported by Bird et al42 and by Evans et al,109 each of whom found that endothelial cells could be protected from serum deprivationinduced cell death if first bound to PECAM-1/IgG or treated with an antiPECAM-1 monoclonal antibody. Although the molecular mechanisms by which PECAM-1 exerts its cytoprotective effects are not yet known, Gao et al110 recently reported preliminary findings showing that PECAM-1 can inhibit cytochrome c release from mitochondria after exposure of cells to a wide range of cytotoxic stimuli that activate Bax, a proapoptotic pore-forming member of the Bcl-2 family that plays a central role in mitochondria-dependent apoptosis.111 Interestingly, both extracellular homophilic binding function and intact cytoplasmic ITIMs seem to be required for PECAM-1 to suppress programmed cell death, because neither homophilic binding-crippled K89A14 nor ITIM-less Y663,686F54 mutant forms of PECAM-1 were able to protect cells from Bax-overexpressioninduced apoptosis. Taken together with previous reports, these data suggest that signals emanating from the PECAM-1 extracellular domain initiate association of 1 or more cytosolic signaling molecules with the PECAM-1 cytoplasmic tail, resulting in the transmission of prosurvival signals that suppress the mitochondria-dependent, Bax-mediated intrinsic apoptotic pathway. Candidate proteins/pathways that might be deserving of additional investigation for their potential to support PECAM-1mediated cell survival are illustrated in Figure 3.
|
Other Functions Mediated by the PECAM-1 Cytoplasmic Domain
As noted above, the cytoplasmic ITIMs of PECAM-1 become tyrosine phosphorylated in response to numerous forms of cellular activation, including thrombin- or collagen-induced platelet aggregation, exposure to oxidative injury, and as a consequence of T or B cell receptor and mast cell Fc
receptor cross-linking. In each case, tyrosine phosphorylation of the PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain results in recruitment and activation of the protein-tyrosine phosphatase, SHP-2. The downstream effectors of the PECAM-1/SHP-2 signaling complex, however, have not yet been described in any of these experimental systems. Progress in this area has recently been made by Osawa et al,41 who discovered that formation of the PECAM-1/SHP-2 signaling complex is required for extracellular signal-regulated kinase (Erk) to become activated when endothelial cells are subjected to fluid shear stress. Erk is an early shear stress response element that regulates transcription of multiple genes, some of which are thought to be involved in atherogenesis, and an earlier study had shown the potential for certain PECAM-1 isoforms to activate Erk.112 Interestingly, the signaling pathway from PECAM-1/SHP-2 to Erk activation seems to involve several steps, including (1) shear-induced perturbation of the plasma membrane, causing (2) activation of one or more tyrosine kinases, which (3) phosphorylate PECAM-1 cytoplasmic ITIM tyrosine residues, resulting in (4) recruitment of SHP-2 and Gab1, a multisite PH-domaincontaining adaptor protein involved in growth factorinduced ERK activation,113 initiating (5) SHP-2/Gab-mediated activation of Erk, probably via the ability of Gab to associate with Shc,114 which in turn recruits the Grb2-Sos Ras activation complex. Taken together, these data implicate PECAM-1 as a mechanoresponsive cell-surface receptor that, together with SHP-2 and Gab1, regulates Erk-mediated endothelial responses to fluid shear stress.
One of the more intriguing and novel functions of PECAM-1mediated signal transduction relates to the ability of PECAM-1 to send "leave me alone" signals from healthy cells to potentially hostile cellular adversaries. Thus, Brown et al115 recently reported that homophilic interactions between PECAM-1positive macrophages and PECAM-1-positive leukocytes results in the transmission of signals that facilitate either active detachment if the leukocyte is viable or phagocytic ingestion if the leukocyte is apoptotic. The nature of the PECAM-1mediated release versus tethering signal has not been fully explored, but it is known to require PECAM-1 cytoplasmic ITIMs, as neither a Y663,686F- nor a glycophosphatidylinositol-linked form of PECAM-1 was able to mediate attachment of apoptotic cells or detachment of viable ones. SHP-2 binding to PECAM-1 was also associated with release signaling, although a causative relationship was not established. It will be interesting in the future to determine the relationships, if any, between PECAM-1mediated detachment signals, PECAM-1mediated integrin activation, and PECAM-1mediated inhibitory signaling.
Concluding Remarks
Contributions from many laboratories over the past 15 years have revealed that PECAM-1 serves several distinct roles in the biology of blood and vascular cells, some no doubt related to its adhesive properties, and others as a result of it ability to transduce signals into cells. The biochemical pathways through which PECAM-1 inhibits cellular activation mediated by ITAM-bearing agonist receptors, modulates integrin function, regulates vascular integrity, and controls cell survival, however, are just now beginning to be defined. Studies in mice and other well-defined experimental systems using selected PECAM-1 variants lacking either adhesive or signaling capacity, or both, will be required to elucidate the manner by which PECAM-1 functions in thrombosis, inflammation, cell survival, and the immune response.
Received February 25, 2003; accepted March 24, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|