Letters to the Editor |
Program in Vascular Medicine and Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Calif
To the Editor:
In the January 2003 issue of this Journal, Chen et al1 observed that L-arginine supplementation did not affect lesion formation in the hypercholesterolemic apolipoprotein E knockout mice, and it negated the protective effect that iNOS gene deficiency has in this model. Their findings are discordant with those observed in most other hypercholesterolemic models in which the administration of supplemental L-arginine improves vasodilation, increases endothelial synthesis of NO, reduces the generation of superoxide anion, suppresses the activation of oxidant sensitive transcriptional proteins, and reduces monocyte adhesion, infiltration, and lesion formation.27 In most hypercholesterolemic models, L-arginine appears to be rate-limiting for the synthesis of NO. This may be due to increases in plasma asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA, an endogenous NOS inhibitor), expression of tissue arginase, or NO synthase uncoupling.810
Attempting to explain the results of Chen et al, in his editorial Loscalzo11 proposes the fanciful hypothesis that supplemental L-arginine could increase plasma levels of homocyst(e)ine, a substance known to induce endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis. Unfortunately, this hypothesis lacks any mechanistic basis or experimental support. Loscalzo notes correctly that L-arginine is a precursor for guanidinoacetate (GAA), a reaction catalyzed by L-arginine:glycine amidinotransferase (AGAT). The methylation of GAA by S-adenosylmethionine yields creatine and S-adenosylhomocysteine. Loscalzo speculates that supplemental arginine could increase homocysteine by this pathway. However, the article he cites to support his speculation revealed that GAA, not L-arginine, increased homocysteine levels in Sprague-Dawley rats.12 Notably, GAA markedly suppressed the activity of AGAT. The negative regulation of AGAT activity by GAA would inhibit the conversion of L-arginine to GAA. Thus, the cited article does not provide evidence that L-arginine supplementation would increase homocysteine levels.
Not only is there absence of evidence, there is evidence of absence. L-arginine administration does not increase plasma homocysteine levels in humans. In patients with peripheral arterial disease and hyperhomocyst(e)inemia, oral L-arginine supplementation (24g/d for 8 weeks) did not affect homocyst(e)ine levels.13 In another study, intravenous infusion of L-arginine (3 g) in diabetic patients actually reduced plasma homocyst(e)ine.14 Notably, we have shown that homocysteine inhibits NO synthesis by increasing the elaboration of ADMA.15 Homocysteine impairs the activity of DDAH (dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase), the enzyme that degrades ADMA. Because it has a critical sulfhydryl in its active site, DDAH is vulnerable to oxidative attack16 Homocysteine forms a mixed disulfide with DDAH, and thereby reduces the degradation of ADMA.15 This mechanism accounts for our recent observation that experimental hyperhomocysteinemia in humans induces an endothelial vasodilator dysfunction that is associated with an increase in plasma ADMA, and that is reversed by intravenous infusion of L-arginine (Stuhlinger MC, Oka RK, Graf EE, Schmolzer I, Upson BM, Kapoor O, Szuba A, Malinow MR, Wascher TC, Pachinger O, Cooke JP, unpublished observations, 2003).
To conclude, L-arginine does not increase plasma homocysteine levels. In most hypercholesterolemic animal models, and in hypercholesterolemic or hyperhomocysteinemic humans, the majority of investigators report that L-arginine supplementation improves vascular function. Supplemental L-arginine may exert this beneficial effect by opposing pathological increases in plasma levels of ADMA, tissue arginase, or NOS uncoupling.
References
Cardiovascular Research Center, Charlestown, Mass
In Response:
Our original intent was to test the hypothesis that L-arginine supplementation would reduce atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E (apoE) knockout mice by providing substrate for eNOS.1 In light of recent data that the iNOS isoform is potentially proatherogenic,2,3 we were concerned that L-arginine might also increase iNOS-derived NO, confounding our results. Thus, we studied both apoE knockout mice and apoE/iNOS double-knockout mice, reasoning that L-arginine could not serve as substrate for iNOS in the double knockout mice. We were surprised to find that L-arginine supplementation did not reduce atherosclerotic burden in the apoE knockout mice, a result in agreement with other reports of the apoE knockout mouse model of atherogenesis.4 Furthermore, we found that L-arginine supplementation eliminated the protective effect of iNOS deficiency in the apoE/iNOS double-knockout mice. To examine potential mechanisms for these effects, we measured oxidized and reduced biopterin levels, as well as MDA-TBA reactive material as markers of lipid oxidation.
In his accompanying editorial,5 Loscalzo pointed out another potential mechanism: that L-arginine may increase plasma levels of homocysteine, because creatine synthesis accounts for the major fraction of total body arginine utilization and results in a significant methylation demand. Loscalzos analysis of the literature and our unexpected results was, we believe, extremely logical and cogent. The hypothesis is an intriguing one. If true, the implications would be very broad indeed, as indiscriminate supplementation with L-arginine may be not be helpful and may in fact be contraindicated. Thus, the hypothesis certainly merits experimental testing.
We have three comments regarding Cookes and Sydows letter. First, they do not acknowledge that, while some studies suggest a beneficial effect of L-arginine on atherosclerosis and endothelial function, other studies fail to show such effects.4,610 A review of the literature suggests that this issue is far from clear. Thus, it becomes all the more important to establish under what conditions L-arginine would be beneficial and restore endothelial function and under what conditions it may be harmful.
Second, their letter misstates that Loscalzo cites the article by Stead et al11 to provide evidence that L-arginine supplementation increases homocysteine levels. Rather, if one reads the editorial carefully, Loscalzo cites numerous references1214 that show that creatine synthesis represents the major fraction of total body arginine utilization, while NO synthesis represents a much lower fraction (1.2%) of arginine flux. Loscalzo cites the article by Stead et al11 to explain why creatine supplementation would be expected to suppress AGAT expression, thereby decreasing methylation stress. Creatine supplementation would therefore be one means to experimentally test the effects of L-arginine supplementation in vivo.
Third, we agree that hyperhomocysteinemia impairs endothelial function. However, these effects do not negate the possibility that L-arginine supplementation may, under certain conditions, increase homocysteine levels.
We believe the results of our study and the issues raised by Loscalzo in his editorial are best resolved by experimental study, so that we can determine when and if L-arginine supplementation is beneficial and, equally importantly, when it might not be.
Footnotes
This communication was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (RO1 HL63685 and PO1AI50153), and the Tobacco Related Disease Research Program (7RT-0128). Dr Sydow is a recipient of a research grant provided by the German Research Council (Sy 41/1-1).
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. R. Madamanchi, A. Vendrov, and M. S. Runge Oxidative Stress and Vascular Disease Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., January 1, 2005; 25(1): 29 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Parnell, J. P. F. Chin-Dusting, J. Starr, and D. M. Kaye In vivo and in vitro evidence for ACh-stimulated L-arginine uptake Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2004; 287(1): H395 - H400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |