| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atherosclerosis and Lipoproteins |
3 Gene Promoter Affects Height and Lipid Metabolism in a French Population
From the Service dEpidémiologie et de Santé Publique, INSERM U.508 (A.M., D.C., N.H., P.A.), Institut Pasteur de Lille; IGBMC (L.F., J.A.), Illkirch; Faculté de Médecine (F.G.), CHU dAmiens, Amiens Cedex; and Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire de Lille (P.A.), Lille, France.
Correspondence to Pr. Philippe Amouyel, Service dEpidémiologie et de Santé Publique, INSERM U.508, Institut Pasteur de Lille, 1 rue Calmette, BP 245, 59019 Lille Cedex, France. E-mail Philippe.Amouyel{at}pasteur-lille.fr
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(PPAR
) plays a role in adipocyte differentiation and insulin sensitization. It has been shown that genetic variation in the PPAR
gene alters body weight control, lipid and insulin homeostasis, and the susceptibility to type 2 diabetes. Four PPAR
isoforms are generated by alternative splicing and promoter usage. PPAR
3 is only expressed in adipose tissue, colon, and macrophages and therefore seems to be a good candidate gene for metabolic and cardiovascular-associated diseases. In the present study, we looked for genetic variation in the PPAR
3 promoter.
Methods and Results The proximal PPAR
3 promoter was sequenced in 20 individuals. We detected a C/G polymorphism at position -681 from exon A2. Interestingly, it was located in a signal transducer and activator of transcription 5B (STAT5B) binding consensus site. In a French population (n=836), the -681G allele was associated with increased height and plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations. In vitro, we showed that the -681G allele completely abolished the binding of STAT5B to the cognate promoter element as well as the transactivation of the PPAR
3 promoter by the growth hormone/STAT5B pathway.
Conclusions Our results suggest that PPAR
3 may regulate the control of height and lipid homeostasis via the STAT5B pathway.
Key Words: obesity cholesterol PPAR growth hormone STAT
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(PPAR
) belongs to the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily and heterodimerises with retinoid X receptor (RXR) to regulate target genes involved in adipocyte differentiation1,2 and insulin sensitization.3 PPAR
is activated by several fatty acid derivatives, such as 15-deoxy-
12,14-prostaglandin J2, 9- and 13-HODE, and linoleic acid.46 Furthermore, PPAR
is the receptor that mediates the antidiabetic effects of thiazolidinediones,7 the oral agents used in the treatment of type II diabetes.8
PPAR
is implicated in several processes, such as adipose,9,10 macrophage,11 and breast12 and colon cell differentiation,13 as well as in glucose and lipid homeostasis.14 The PPAR
gene produces 4 different PPAR
mRNAs by alternative splicing and promoter usage,1519 giving rise to 2 different proteins, with PPAR
1, PPAR
3, and PPAR
4 being similar and PPAR
2 having an additional 30 amino acids at the N terminus.18 PPAR
1 is ubiquitously expressed, PPAR
2 is restricted to adipose tissue, and PPAR
3 seems mainly confined to macrophages, adipose tissue, and colon.16 The tissue distribution of PPAR
4 has not been explored yet.19 Based on this tissue distribution pattern, PPAR
3 is an interesting candidate gene for genetic susceptibility to metabolic disorders and associated cardiovascular diseases. Mutations in the PPAR
gene have been of great interest in helping to study and unravel the complex and multiple biological actions of PPAR
in vivo. The following mutations in the PPAR
gene have been described: (1) a silent C/T polymorphism in exon 6 associated with higher plasma leptin levels in obese subjects20; (2) a Pro12Ala substitution in PPAR
2 associated with lower PPAR
2 activity in vitro and decreased type II diabetes risk21; (3) a very rare Pro115Gln mutation that renders the protein constitutively active associated with a severe obesity phenotype22; and (4) heterozygous mutations in the ligand-binding domain associated with severe insulin resistance.23 To address the possibility that sequence variations in the promoter of PPAR
3 might be associated with altered expression regulation of PPAR
3, we sequenced the exon A2 and the PPAR
3 promoter in 20 subjects coming from the Northern France MONICA population study.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3 promoter and 74 bp of the exon A2) (Figure 1) was sequenced in 20 French subjects. Two polymorphisms were detected: a T/C polymorphism at position -553 and a C/G substitution at position -681 from the beginning of exon A2 (GenBank accession No. AF548352). These two polymorphisms were in complete linkage disequilibrium, but only the C-681G polymorphism was located in the sequence motif TTCATGGAA (polymorphism underlined) that closely resembles the
-interferonactivated sequence (GAS)-like element (GLE) TTCNNNGAA. This element has been demonstrated to be a DNA-binding site for transcription factors of the signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) family.24,25 A polymorphism in this motif might therefore have a functional impact. Consequently, we decided to analyze the C-681G polymorphism in our French population. The genotype distribution of the PPAR
3 C-681G polymorphism (n=836) was as follows: CC, 56.6%; CG, 36.9%; and GG, 6.5% (G allele frequency, 0.25) (Table 1). This distribution was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. No differences were observed between genders. These frequencies were similar in subjects with type II diabetes (n=49) or with obesity (n=232) (subjects defined with a body mass index [BMI]
30 kg/m2) (data not shown). We explored the potential relationship between the PPAR
3 C-681G polymorphism and obesity markers such as body weight, body mass index, plasma leptin levels, and plasma glucose and lipid-related variables. Subjects carrying the -681 G allele were taller and had higher body weight, plasma total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B concentrations than CC subjects (Table 2). Because medication during adulthood would not have an effect on height, the impact of the polymorphism on height was also analyzed in the entire population (n=1133), and similar results were found (data not shown). No association with body mass index, waist to hip ratio, or plasma leptin levels could be detected. These results were consistent in both sexes (data not shown).
|
|
|
The C-681G polymorphism is located in a putative STAT binding site. The members of the STAT family are latent cytoplasmic transcription factors that after being tyrosine-phosphorylated in response to various hormones and cytokines (eg, prolactin, growth hormone, interferon
, and tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-
) translocate to the nucleus, where they regulate the transcription of target genes. We first evaluated the ability of STAT3, STAT5A, and STAT5B to transactivate the PPAR
3 promoter. We created a vector containing the PPAR
3 promoter with the C allele in front of the luciferase gene (pGL3
3/C). This reporter vector was cotransfected in mouse preadipocyte 3T3-L1 cells together with expression vectors encoding the growth hormone receptor (GHR) and either STAT3, or STAT5A or STAT5B. Cells were incubated in the absence or presence of human growth hormone (hGH), an activator of the STAT proteins. Cells cotransfected with activated STAT5B showed a 3-fold induction of PPAR
3 promoter activity compared with nonactivated STAT5B transfected cells (Figure 2A). Neither activated STAT5A nor activated STAT3 had an effect on the activity of the PPAR
3 promoter (Figure 2A), suggesting that the expression of PPAR
3 seems specifically regulated by STAT5B. To confirm that the activity of the PPAR
3 promoter was specific of STAT5B, a vector expressing the transactivation domain-truncated version of STAT5B (STAT5B
754) that acts as a dominant negative toward the full-length STAT5B26 was cotransfected with the PPAR
3-luciferase reporter construct and cells were stimulated by hGH. No induction of the PPAR
3 promoter activity could be detected with the dominant-negative STAT5B vector (Figure 2B). This experiment showed that the PPAR
3 transactivation was specific of STAT5B and that the transactivation domain of STAT5B was necessary to mediate this effect.
|
To explore whether the PPAR
3 C-681G polymorphism had any influence on the regulation of the PPAR
3 promoter by STAT5B, we made a PPAR
3-luciferase reporter vector including the G allele (pGL3
3/G). 3T3-L1 cells cotransfected with either the pGL3
3/G or pGL3
3/C vector and with expression vectors encoding GHR and STAT5B were incubated in the absence or presence of hGH. Cells stimulated with hGH transfected with pGL3
3/G showed lower PPAR
3 promoter activity than cells transfected with pGL3
3/C at levels comparable to the empty pGL3 vector (Figure 2C).
To additionally investigate the specific transactivation of the PPAR
3 promoter by STAT5B, we evaluated the ability of STAT5A and STAT5B to bind to the PPAR
3 promoter. Nuclear extracts from COS7 cells cotransfected with either STAT5A or STAT5B and GHR expression vectors, stimulated with hGH or not, were prepared and used for electrophoretic mobility shift assays (Figure 3). Radiolabeled 20-mer oligonucleotides containing either the PPAR
3 STAT C or G allele were used as probes. We used the high-affinity STAT binding site from the ß-casein gene promoter as a positive control. As expected, no bandshift was detected with nuclear extracts from cells unstimulated with hGH, consistent with the presence of nonactive STAT proteins (lanes 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11). When nuclear extracts from hGH-treated cells transfected with STAT5B were used, a binding to the STAT site containing the C allele could be observed (lane 4). Similar protein-DNA complex was observed when the STAT-binding site of the ß-casein was used as a positive probe, suggesting that this DNA-protein complex probably contains the STAT5 protein (lanes 10 and 12). Conversely, STAT5A did not bind to the C allelecontaining STAT site (lane 2). When the oligonucleotide containing the G allele was used as a probe with nuclear extracts from cells transfected with activated STAT5B, no binding could be observed (lane 8).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3 influences height and lipid homeostasis in humans, maybe through the modulation of the PPAR
3 gene transcription by the STAT5B pathway.
We demonstrated that the GH/STAT5B pathway could activate the PPAR
3 promoter in 3T3-L1 cells and that the PPAR
3 C-681G polymorphism prevented it. Furthermore, STAT5B was able to bind the PPAR
3 STAT consensus site, whereas STAT5A was not. STAT5A and STAT5B proteins are products of two different genes and show an
90% amino acid similarity.27 STAT5A and STAT5B have both the abilities of binding the prolactin response element of the ß-casein gene27 and of being activated by GH. However, they differ most markedly in their DNA-binding specificity,28 which may explain the specific PPAR
3 transactivation by STAT5B only. We also showed that the C-681G allelic variation completely abolished the binding of STAT5B to the PPAR
3 promoter, which could explain the lower activity of the mutant PPAR
3 promoter. We are not excluding the fact that other components than GH such as prolactin, interleukins, erythropoietin, or TNF-
can also activate the STATs and modulate PPAR
3 expression. Indeed, it has been shown previously that TPA stimulates PPAR
3 expression in macrophages17 or that prolactin enhances PPAR
expression in NIH-3T3 cells.29 Similarly, a STAT1 binding site has been described in the PPAR
2 promoter, and IFN-
could decrease the promoter activity by acting through this STAT1 site.30 Therefore, the STAT proteins might have an important role in PPAR
expression regulation.
The higher height in G allele bearers suggests that PPAR
might be implicated in the growth of the skeleton. Several studies have now shown a role for PPAR
in osteoblast/osteoclast activity. It has been shown that low doses of PPAR
ligands induce the osteoblastic maturation of mouse preosteoblast cells, even though high doses inhibit it.31 Lecka-Czernik and colleagues32,33 demonstrated that activation of PPAR
2 with rosiglitazone in U-33/
2 cells stimulated the differentiation of the cells into adipocytes and blocked their ability to become osteoblasts. The activation of the PPAR
pathway also inhibits the osteoclast formation and activation.34,35 Moreover, Ogawa et al36 reported that primary osteoblasts express PPAR
and that the common PPAR
C/T exon 6 polymorphism is associated with lower bone mineral density in Japanese postmenopausal women. Our results additionally support a potential role for PPAR
in bone metabolism. Growth hormone (GH) is the key hormone of bone metabolism. Its effects are mediated through activation of the GHR,37 the receptor-associated tyrosine kinase JAK2,38 and the STATs.25,40 PPAR
may modulate some of the effects of GH. A potential modulatory effect of PPAR
over the STAT signaling pathway is suggested by Ricote et al,11 who showed that the natural or synthetic PPAR
ligands can inhibit STAT activity in a PPAR
-dependent manner. Therefore, PPAR
could attenuate STAT signaling and potentially interfere with GH effects. As a consequence of the C-681G polymorphism, the expression of PPAR
would be decreased in response to GH, and if we assume that PPAR
inhibits STAT5B, which is a GH mediator, then a mutation in the STAT site is equivalent to increased levels of GH, resulting in a possible increase in final height and body weight of subjects bearing the -681 G allele. The absence of effects of the PPAR
3 C-681G polymorphism on BMI, waist to hip ratio, or plasma leptin levels suggests that the increased body weight in G allele bearers was attributable to increased lean body mass rather than increased fat mass.
Moreover, subjects carrying the G allele had increased plasma apolipoprotein B and total and LDL-cholesterol levels, important cardiovascular risk factors. Monocytes and macrophages, where PPAR
3 is expressed, are pivotal to the development of atherosclerosis. Ricote et al11 showed that PPAR
inhibits the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase, gelatinase B, and the scavenger receptor A genes in response to synthetic ligands in macrophages, probably by antagonizing the transcription factors AT-1, STAT, and nuclear factor-
B. Moreover, our results can also be connected to the fact that PPAR
is an important regulator of the scavenger receptor CD36, a receptor that is thought to be important during macrophage uptake of modified LDL and foam cell formation.41
Expression of STAT5A and STAT5B are elevated in murine and human adipocytes compared with their fibroblast precursors.42,43 Moreover, the induction of these proteins is regulated in a PPAR
ligand-dependent manner during adipogenesis.44 The fact that STAT5B knockout mice display elevated plasma GH, abnormal growth rate, and impaired adipocyte differentiation (no lipids in the cells)45,46 reinforces the involvement of STAT5B as a mediator of GH and as a factor important in adipocyte differentiation. Therefore, the STAT proteins may regulate fat-specific gene expression as well as upstream transcriptional factors like PPAR
and be themselves regulated by those transcriptional factors.
In conclusion, our data suggest that PPAR
3 may be involved in the control of height and lipid homeostasis in humans through the GH/STAT5B pathway and may mediate some of the proatherogenic effects of GH.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received August 12, 2002; accepted November 12, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
12,14-prostaglandin J2 is a ligand for the adipocyte determination factor PPAR gamma. Cell. 1995; 83: 803812.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
). J Biol Chem. 1995; 270: 1295312956.
gene. J Biol Chem. 1997; 272: 1877918789.
3 mRNA: a distinct PPAR
mRNA subtype transcribed from an independent promoter. FEBS Lett. 1998; 438: 5560.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
) in human atherosclerosis and regulation in macrophages by colony stimulating factors and oxidized low density lipoprotein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95: 76147619.
promoter in man and transactivation by the nuclear receptor ROR
1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001; 287: 383390.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
gene influences plasma leptin levels in obese humans. Hum Mol Genet. 1998; 7: 435440.
2 ligands on adipocytes versus osteoblast differentiation. Endocrinology. 2002; 143: 23762384.
ligand-dependent induction of STAT1, STAT5A, and STAT5B during adipogenesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999; 262: 216222.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Chen, G. Jin, Y. Wang, H. Wang, H. Liu, Y. Liu, W. Fan, H. Ma, R. Miao, Z. Hu, et al. Genetic variants in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma} gene are associated with risk of lung cancer in a Chinese population Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2008; 29(2): 342 - 350. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E Cecil, C. N. Palmer, B. Fischer, P. Watt, D. J Wallis, I. Murrie, and M. M Hetherington Variants of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma}- and {beta}-adrenergic receptor genes are associated with measures of compensatory eating behaviors in young children Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2007; 86(1): 167 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X Han, N Benight, B Osuntokun, K Loesch, S J Frank, and L A Denson Tumour necrosis factor {alpha} blockade induces an anti-inflammatory growth hormone signalling pathway in experimental colitis Gut, January 1, 2007; 56(1): 73 - 81. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Han, B. Osuntokun, N. Benight, K. Loesch, S. J. Frank, and L. A. Denson Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 5b Promotes Mucosal Tolerance in Pediatric Crohn's Disease and Murine Colitis Am. J. Pathol., December 1, 2006; 169(6): 1999 - 2013. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-Z. Liu, Y.-F. Guo, P. Xiao, D.-H. Xiong, L.-J. Zhao, H. Shen, Y.-J. Liu, V. Dvornyk, J.-R. Long, H.-Y. Deng, et al. Epistasis between Loci on Chromosomes 2 and 6 Influences Human Height J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2006; 91(10): 3821 - 3825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L Dubuquoy, C Rousseaux, X Thuru, L Peyrin-Biroulet, O Romano, P Chavatte, M Chamaillard, and P Desreumaux PPAR{gamma} as a new therapeutic target in inflammatory bowel diseases. Gut, September 1, 2006; 55(9): 1341 - 1349. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-P. Koh, J.-M. Yuan, D. Van Den Berg, S. A. Ingles, and M. C. Yu Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) {gamma} gene polymorphisms and colorectal cancer risk among Chinese in Singapore Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2006; 27(9): 1797 - 1802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Meirhaeghe, D. Cottel, P. Amouyel, and J. Dallongeville Association Between Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} Haplotypes and the Metabolic Syndrome in French Men and Women Diabetes, October 1, 2005; 54(10): 3043 - 3048. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Knouff and J. Auwerx Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{gamma} Calls for Activation in Moderation: Lessons from Genetics and Pharmacology Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2004; 25(6): 899 - 918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |