| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atherosclerosis and Lipoproteins |
From the Crafoord Laboratory/Department of Thoracic Surgery (S.T., K.H., K.T., G.V.) and Department of Clinical Chemistry (L.-O.H), Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, and Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.L.), Huddinge University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Correspondence to Guro Valen, MD, PhD, Crafoord Laboratory L6:00, Karolinska Hospital, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden. E-mail Guro.Valen{at}cmm.ki.se
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: ischemic preconditioning remote preconditioning atherosclerosis brain ischemia inducible nitric oxide synthase
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
NO is constitutively produced by endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) and has a variety of biologic actions.6 On stimuli involving cytokine production and activation of the redox-sensitive transcription factor nuclear factor kappa-B (NF
B), inducible NOS (iNOS) is induced in a variety of cells.7,8 In models of preconditioning targeting the heart to protect the heart, NO has been suggested to be a signal molecule initiating adaptation to ischemia.8 Delayed preconditioning may be mediated by NO produced by iNOS, induced by the preconditioning episode in the heart.8 Evidence for the latter is provided by studies that pharmacologic and genetic inhibition of iNOS abolishes the preconditioning effect.910 However, a possible role for iNOS in remote or systemic preconditioning has not been clarified.
Unstable angina may represent a clinical correlate to preconditioning. Several studies indicate that having unstable angina before acute myocardial infarction reduces morbidity and mortality,11 where unstable angina may cause short episodes of spontaneous ischemia due to intermittent hypoperfusion. It is possible that also spontaneous ischemia in any human organ may influence heart function and necrosis analogous to remote preconditioning, but this is not feasible to investigate.
With the development of recombinant DNA techniques, new animal models of atherosclerosis have emerged, including the apolipoprotein E and LDL receptor double knockout (ApoE/LDLr KO) mouse which has a lesion distribution pattern and composition similar to humans.12 When ApoE/LDLr KO mice are fed an atherogenic diet for 7 to 9 months to accelerate development of atherosclerosis, severe atherosclerosis with lesions throughout the vasculature develop.13,14 The animals are prone to stress-induced myocardial infarctions.15 The present study investigates if spontaneous ischemic events in hearts and brains of ApoE/LDLr KO mice with severe atherosclerosis protects their isolated hearts against induced global ischemia, if remote preconditioning could be evoked by brain ischemia in wild-type animals, and searches a possible mechanism of remote preconditioning effect of brain ischemia.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Isolated Heart Perfusion
The Langendorff procedures are described in detail online (please see http://atvb.ahajournals.org). Briefly, hearts were isolated, and the aorta was cannulated and retrogradely perfused with buffer at a constant pressure. A left ventricular balloon recorded systolic (LVSP), end-diastolic (LVEDP), and developed (LVDP LVSP-LVEDP) pressures, as well as the maximum (max) and negative (neg) first derivatives of pressures (dP/dt). Coronary flow (CF) was measured, while heart rate and arrhythmias were calculated.
Induced Brain Ischemia
To investigate if brain ischemia could precondition the heart, bilateral ligation of the internal carotid arteries 24 to 32 hours before heart isolation was performed in C57BL6 animals or iNOS KO mice to investigate iNOS as a possible mediator. See http://atvb.ahajournals.org for the surgical procedure.
Protocol
All hearts were stabilized for 25 minutes. A 40-minute global ischemia was induced by clamping the inflow tubing followed by 60 minutes of reperfusion.
The following groups were investigated. (For ApoE/LDLr KO mice, group allocation was retrospective and a result of signs of disease combined with serum analysis and immunohistochemical examination as described below and in the Table):
Measurement of Infarct Size
Triphenyl tetrazolium chloride solution 1%, (TTC) was used to calculate infarct size. The procedure as well as measurements of cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and S100B are described online (please see http://atvb.ahajournals.org).
Immunohistochemical Analysis of Recent Heart Infarction
After TTC staining, sectioning, and measurement of infarct size, hearts of all ApoE/LDLr KO mice were investigated for evidence of recent heart infarction in the apex, the middle region, and the aortic root. After paraffin embedding, 5-µm sections were stained with a rabbit anti-fibronectin antibody (Sigma) to find infarctions occurring 24 to 48 hours before the experiments. A biotinylated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody with an avidin-biotin detection system (Vectastain Elite ABC Kit), DAB solution (DAB Substrate Kit, Vector Laboratories) and counter staining with hematoxylin was performed for visualization. To differentiate between old and recent infarctions, Massons trichrome staining, which stains collagen green at a later stage of scar formation, was used.16,17
Immunoblotting and Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR; TaqMan PCR)
Please see http://atvb.ahajournals.org for details.
Statistical Analysis
Repeated measure ANOVA was used for evaluation of differences in hemodynamics between groups, with a Fisher PLSD post-hoc test. One-factor ANOVA was used to evaluate infarct size, cTnT release, serum S100B, serum cTnT, and optical density of immunoblot bands between groups (Stat View 4.0, Abacus Concepts, Inc). Data are presented as mean±SEM.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
To evaluate in vivo spontaneous infarction of older age, Massons trichrome, which stains collagen green in a later stage of fibrosis formation, was used. Only one heart of ApoE/LDLr KO mice with signs of disease had positive staining with Massons trichrome (not shown). The area was overlapping with the border for positive anti-fibronectin staining. Massons trichrome gave no positive staining in any other heart.
B: Serum cTnT
The serum cTnT level in ApoE/LDLr KO mice with suspected in vivo heart infarction was higher than in controls (P=0.03). Serum cTnT was not significantly increased in any other group (Table).
Evidence of Brain Ischemia: Serum S100B
Mice with neurological signs of disease (animals 6, 7, and 8, in Table), or with serum S100B higher than mean ±2SD (>6.1 µg/L) of controls, were allocated into the brain infarction group (animal 9, 10, and 11 in Table). These animals had higher S100B levels than ApoECon (P=0.0002, Table). The serum S100B in the ApoEHeart group was not higher than ApoECon. Inducing brain ischemia increased serum S100B in C57BL6 mice compared with sham-operated mice (P=0.03), but S100B did not increase in iNOS KO compared with their shams (Table).
Cardiac Performance After Spontaneous Ischemic Events
There were no differences between groups in any parameter before global ischemia (Figure 2). LVDP was depressed during postischemic reperfusion of ApoE/LDLr KO control hearts. Spontaneous ischemic events in heart or brain before Langendorff perfusion attenuated the depression of LVDP (P=0.02 and P=0.04, respectively, Figure 2a). LVEDP increased during reperfusion of ApoECon. In hearts of animals with spontaneous heart or brain infarction, the increase of LVEDP was attenuated (P=0.0001 and P=0.0003, respectively, Figure 2b). Max dP/dt was depressed and neg dP/dt was increased during reperfusion of ApoECon. The changes of max dP/dt and neg dP/dt were attenuated by spontaneous heart (P=0.009 and P=0.02) and brain (P=0.005 and P=0.01, respectively, Figure 2c) ischemia. Brain ischemia before Langendorff-perfusion increased CF during reperfusion (P=0.01), while heart infarctions did not significantly improve CF compared with controls (Figure 2d). There were no differences between groups in heart rate or percentage of arrhythmias during the observation period (data not shown).
|
Cardiac Performance After Induced Brain Ischemia
In C57BL6 mice, there were no differences between groups in cardiac performance in any parameter before ischemia. LVDP was depressed during reperfusion of sham-operated C57BL6 mice hearts. Induced brain ischemia 24 to 32 hours before heart isolation attenuated the depression of LVDP (P=0.02, Figure 3a). LVEDP increased during reperfusion of sham-operated controls, and this increase was attenuated by induced brain ischemia (P=0.04, Figure 3b). Induced brain ischemia also attenuated the depression of max dP/dt (P=0.01) and the increase of neg dP/dt (P=0.02) during reperfusion (not shown). Induced brain ischemia did not influence CF, heart rate, or occurrence of arrhythmias during reperfusion (data not shown).
|
In iNOS KO mice, there were no differences between groups in any parameter before ischemia. Induced brain ischemia in iNOS KO mice did not influence the depression of LVDP or the increase of LVEDP during postischemic perfusion (Figure 3c), and did not influence any other parameter during reperfusion (not shown).
Infarct Size and cTnT Release Into the Coronary Effluent
At the end of reperfusion,
30% of myocardial tissue was necrotic as judged by TTC staining of control ApoE/LDLr KO mice. Spontaneous ischemic events in heart (P=0.001) or brain (P=0.003) reduced the Langendorff-induced infarct size (Figure 4, top). In sham-operated C57BL6 mice, infarct size was
20% and was decreased by induced brain ischemia before heart perfusion (P=0.002, Figure 4, top). In hearts of iNOS KO mice, however, no infarct-limiting effect of inducing brain ischemia was found (Figure 4A).
|
Cardiac TnT release into the coronary effluent increased during reperfusion of ApoE/LDLr KO ischemic control hearts (Figure 4, bottom). Both spontaneous heart (P=0.02) and brain (P=0.01) infarction before Langendorff perfusion reduced the release of cTnT. This could be mimicked by induced brain ischemia in C57BL6, but not in iNOS KO mice (P=0.01, Figure 4, bottom).
Expression of iNOS
A: Protein
Proteins were extracted from C57BL6 mice hearts 24 hours after induced brain ischemia, with sham-operated animals as controls. When the proteins were separated by electrophoresis, transferred to a membrane, and incubated with a rabbit polyclonal anti-iNOS antibody, a band of 130 kDa corresponding to the size of iNOS appeared (Figure 5a). The bands were related to the protein loading as evaluated with Ponceau solution (not shown). There was no difference in expression of iNOS in hearts of animals with or without induced brain ischemia.
|
B: RNA
RNA was extracted from hearts of C57BL6 mice serially after induced brain ischemia and amplified by real-time PCR, relating iNOS expression to that of ß-actin. No increase of cardiac gene expression of iNOS was detected in a 24-hour time course (Figure 5b).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have previously investigated atherosclerotic lesions in age- and diet-matched siblings of the presently used ApoE/LDLr KO mice and found advanced fibrofatty lesions distributed throughout the vasculature.13,14 Caligiuri et al15 found that stress in vivo induced myocardial infarctions in these animals, mediated by endothelin receptor signaling. To evaluate if cardiac necrosis observed after reperfusion was due to the Langendorff intervention, recent spontaneous infarction in vivo, or infarction of older age, an approach including different staining techniques and measuring serum cTnT was used. cTnT is a cardiospecific, structural protein of striated muscle fibers released by myocyte injury. The areas unstained by TTC included all these types of myocardial necrosis. Fibronectin is a multifunctional, extracellular matrix glycoprotein, which is present in early wound healing. It has been demonstrated in cardiomyocytes within one day after ischemic onset, and the intensity of staining becomes maximal after 48 hours.16,17 At that time, migration of collagen-producing fibroblasts starts in the border zone of myocardial infarction. Massons trichrome stains collagen green starting in this later stage of fibrosis formation. We found evidence of spontaneous heart infarctions by anti-fibronectin staining in 5 of 6 hearts in this group, while the sixth heart was allocated to the group based on the very high serum cTnT. Only one of all investigated ApoE/LDLr KO mice hearts had positive staining also for Massons trichrome in the border of anti-fibronectin staining area. This particular heart probably had an infarction 48 to 72 hours before Langendorff perfusion, which is within the time course of delayed preconditioning described by others.2 For the rest of the animals in this group, a combination of signs of disease, high cTnT levels, and/or positive fibronectin staining indicated spontaneous ischemic events 24 to 48 hours before heart isolation.
S100B belongs to a family of intracellular calcium-binding proteins originating from astroglial and Schwann cells, and it leaks to serum if the permeability of the blood-brain barrier is increased.18 We demonstrated an increased serum level of S100B in 6 ApoE/LDLr KO mice with signs of disease, including 3 paraplegic mice, and in C57BL6 mice with induced brain ischemia. It is therefore indicated that our mice had damage to not only astroglial or Schwann cells but also to the blood-brain barrier, which usually occurs in brain infarction.
Hearts of animals with spontaneous ischemic events in the heart or brain were protected against injury in a manner analogous to ischemic preconditioning. Ischemic preconditioning can be evoked experimentally by brief episodes of ischemia and reperfusion immediately or 24 to 72 hours before a sustained ischemic event.2 This protects the heart whether the preconditioning is performed on the heart itself2 or in other organs.35 However, we have found no publications demonstrating that spontaneously occurring ischemic events may protect the heart. One possible clinical correlate to both ischemic preconditioning and the present findings is evidence of preinfarction or unstable angina protecting the heart.11,12 Unstable angina is currently thought to be caused by rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque, and is associated with a systemic inflammatory reaction.19 Unstable angina activates cardiac heat shock protein 72, eNOS, and the transcription factor NFkB in patients with recent symptoms.20 We speculate that, from an adaptive point of view, it appears sensible for an organism subjected to an acute ischemic event or inflammation of another etiology to defend itself against a possible next event in the same or another organ through increasing endogenous protection. The present findings pinpoint that organ protection is generated by ischemia, rather than by ischemia and reperfusion, and may thus represent a key to the pathway of solving the preconditioning enigma. Furthermore, systemic as well as local effects of ischemic adaption are implicated with the present findings, indicating that when fully elucidated, the principles underlying endogenous ischemic adaptation may be used to treat a wide spectra of patients with inflammatory disease and not only ischemic hearts.
It has been demonstrated that the brain itself can be preconditioned by cerebral ischemia both as immediate21 and delayed protection,22 but we have found no publication demonstrating that brain ischemia may precondition the heart. To investigate whether brain ischemia directly could protect the heart, a group of animals subjected to induced brain ischemia by bilateral ligation of the internal carotid arteries was included in the study. Bilateral ligation of the internal carotid arteries did not cause any lasting neurologic disorders and no gross morphological changes when evaluating brain sections stained with hematoxylin/eosin 24 hours later. Transitory neurologic disturbances were observed. Heart function, infarct size, cTnT release, as well as serum S100B were very similar in animals with induced and spontaneous ischemic events.
In models of preconditioning the heart to protect it, NO has been launched as both a trigger and a mediator of endogenous protection.8 It has been shown by others that iNOS is upregulated after preconditioning of the heart.9 In accordance with the present findings, pharmacologic and genetic inhibition of iNOS abolishes the preconditioning effect in models of cardiac preconditioning.9,10 However, in the present study, no increase of cardiac iNOS could be detected either at the time of corresponding to Langendorff perfusion (protein/RNA) or in a 24-hour time course after induced brain ischemia (RNA). Thus, the observed lack of preconditioning effect in mice with targeted disruption of iNOS gene is most likely to be due to NO as a trigger rather than a mediator of effect.
In summary, spontaneous ischemic events in hearts and brains of severely atherosclerotic ApoE/LDLr KO mice protected heart function and reduced necrosis when exposed to global ischemia 24 to 48 hours later, analogous to delayed preconditioning. These findings could be mimicked by inducing brain ischemia in C57BL6 mice. iNOS KO mice could not be preconditioned by induced brain ischemia. As C57BL6 mice with induced brain ischemia did not have increased cardiac iNOS, NO is likely a trigger of protection in this model. The present findings pinpoint that organ protection is generated by ischemia rather than by ischemia and reperfusion and may thus represent a key to the pathway of solving the preconditioning enigma.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received February 22, 2002; accepted March 15, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Guo Y, Wu WJ, Qiu Y, Tang XL, Yang Z, Bolli R. Demonstration of an early and a late phase of ischemic preconditioning in mice. Am J Physiol. 1998; 275: H1375H1387.
3. Oxman T, Arad M, Klein R, Avazov N, Rabinowitz B. Limb ischemia preconditions the heart against reperfusion tachyarrhythmia. Am J Physiol. 1997; 273: H1707H1712.
4.
Gho BC, Schoemaker RG, van den Doel MA, Duncker DJ, Verdouw PD. Myocardial protection by brief ischemia in noncardiac tissue. Circulation. 1996; 94: 21932200.
5.
Takaoka A, Nakae I, Mitsunami K, Yabe T, Morikawa S, Inubushi T, Kinoshita M. Renal ischemia/reperfusion remotely improves myocardial energy metabolism during myocardial ischemia via adenosine receptors in rabbits: effects of "remote preconditioning." J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 33: 556564.
6. Fleming I, Busse R. NO: the primary EDRF. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1999; 31: 514.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Xuan YT, Tang XL, Banerjee S, Takano H, Li RC, Han H, Qiu Y, Li JJ, Bolli R. Nuclear factor-kappaB plays an essential role in the late phase of ischemic preconditioning in conscious rabbits. Circ Res. 1999; 84: 10951109.
8. Bolli R, Dawn B, Tang XL, Qiu Y, Ping P, Xuan YT, Jones WK, Takano H, Guo Y, Zhang J. The nitric oxide hypothesis of late preconditioning. Basic Res Cardiol. 1998; 93: 325338.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Guo Y, Jones WK, Xuan YT, Tang XL, Bao W, Wu WJ, Han H, Laubach VE, Ping P, Yang Z, Qiu Y, Bolli R. The late phase of ischemic preconditioning is abrogated by targeted disruption of the inducible NO synthase gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96: 1150711512.
10. Imagawa J, Yellon DM, Baxter GF. Pharmacological evidence that inducible nitric oxide is a mediator of preconditioning. Br J Pharmacol. 1999; 126: 701708.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Kloner RA, Shook T, Przyklenk K, Davis VG, Junio L, Matthews RV, Burstein S, Gibson M, Poole K, Cannon CP, McCabe CH, Braunwald E. Previous angina alters in-hospital outcome in TIMI 4: a clinical correlate to preconditioning? Circulation. 1995; 91: 3747.
12. Hofker MH, van Vlijmen BJ, Havekes LM. Transgenic mouse models to study the role of APOE in hyperlipidemia and atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 1998; 137: 111.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Jiang J, Valen G, Thorén P, Pernow J. Endothelial dysfunction in apolipoprotein Edeficient mice: improved relaxation by combined L-arginine-tretrahydrobiopterin and enhanced vasoconstriction by endothelin. Br J Pharmacol. 2000; 131: 12551261.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Li G, Tokuno S, Tähepôld P, Vaage J, Löwbeer C, Valen G. Ischemic and hyperoxic preconditioning improve myocardial function and reduce infarct size in the severely atherosclerotic mouse heart. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001; 71: 12961304.
15.
Caligiuri G, Levy B, Pernow J, Thoren P, Hansson GK. Myocardial infarction mediated by endothelin receptor signaling in hypercholesterolemic mice. PNAS. 1999; 96: 69206924.
16. Willems IE, Arends JW, Daemen MJ. Tenascin and fibronectin expression in healing human myocardial scars. J Pathol. 1996; 179: 321325.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Casscells W, Kimura H, Sanchez JA, Yu ZX, Ferrans VJ. Immunohistochemical study of fibronectin in experimental myocardial infarction. Am J Pathol. 1990; 137: 801810.[Abstract]
18.
Persson L, Hardemark HG, Gustafsson J, Rundstrom G, Mendel-Hartvig I, Esscher T, Pahlman S. S-100 protein and neuron-specific enolase in cerebrospinal fluid and serum: markers of cell damage in human central nervous system. Stroke. 1987; 18: 911918.
19.
Mehta JL, Saldeen TGP, Rand K. Interactive role of infection, inflammation and traditional risk factors in atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 31: 12171225.
20.
Valen G, Hansson GK, Dumitrescu A, Vaage J. Unstable angina activates myocardial heat shock protein 72, endothelial nitric oxide synthase, and transcription factors NF
B and AP-1. Cardiovasc Res. 2000; 47: 4956.
21. Perez-Pinzon MA, Xu GP, Dietrich WD, Rosenthal M, Sick TJ. Rapid preconditioning protects rats against ischemic neuronal damage after 3 but not 7 days of reperfusion following global cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1997; 17: 175182.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Kitagawa K, Matsumoto M, Tagaya M, Hata R, Ueda H, Niinobe M, Handa N, Fukunaga R, Kimura K, Mikoshiba K, et al. Ischemic tolerance phenomenon found in the brain. Brain Res. 1990; 528: 2124.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. J. Hausenloy and D. M. Yellon Remote ischaemic preconditioning: underlying mechanisms and clinical application Cardiovasc Res, August 1, 2008; 79(3): 377 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Ferdinandy, R. Schulz, and G. F. Baxter Interaction of Cardiovascular Risk Factors with Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury, Preconditioning, and Postconditioning Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2007; 59(4): 418 - 458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Gross Remote preconditioning and delayed cardioprotection in skeletal muscle Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2005; 289(6): R1562 - R1563. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Kristiansen, O. Henning, R. K. Kharbanda, J. E. Nielsen-Kudsk, M. R. Schmidt, A. N. Redington, T. T. Nielsen, and H. E. Botker Remote preconditioning reduces ischemic injury in the explanted heart by a KATP channel-dependent mechanism Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2005; 288(3): H1252 - H1256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Vaage and G. Valen Preconditioning and cardiac surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2003; 75(2): S709 - 714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2002 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |