Atherosclerosis and Lipoproteins |
From the Center of Lipid and Arteriosclerosis Studies, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (D.G.K., B.Z., D.Y.H.), University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, and the Division of Pathology (D.P.W.), Childrens Hospital Research Foundation, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Correspondence to David Y. Hui, PhD, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0529. E-mail huidy{at}email.uc.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 loci.
Key Words: mouse genetics restenosis arteriosclerosis smooth muscle cells
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
See page 884
Accelerated coronary arteriosclerosis due to restenosis after surgical operations is different from progressive cholesterol-induced atherosclerosis in that lipid deposition and macrophage foam cell appearance are late events.1,2 For balloon angioplasty, constrictive remodeling of the vessel wall appears to be the major contributing factor of restenosis.35 The introduction of intravascular stent placement to prevent constrictive vascular remodeling has been successful to an extent in reducing the incidence of restenosis after vascular surgery. Unfortunately, in-stent restenosis remains a major complication that is occurring at an unacceptable rate.6 The pathology of in-stent restenosis resembles that observed in transplant restenosis, with neointimal hyperplasia being the main event.7 The neointima is derived from abnormal proliferation and migration of smooth muscle cells from the tunica media to the intima. One possible mechanism suggested for the activation of smooth muscle cells is cytokine release as a consequence of mechanically induced endothelial denudation. However, although vascular surgery invariably results in endothelial denudation, not all patients undergoing these surgical procedures suffer restenosis. Thus, some other factor(s) may be important in determining susceptibility to vascular reocclusion after surgery. The key factors that are important for regulating injury-induced smooth muscle cell proliferation and neointimal hyperplasia, hallmarks of vascular occlusion, have not been completely elucidated.
A possible genetic influence on vascular stenosis has been suggested by several recent studies. First, genetic variation in human carotid artery wall thickness has been observed.8 Second, genetic differences in neointimal hyperplasia after vascular injury have been reported in the rat model.9 Finally, differences in the vascular remodeling phenotype (including positive and negative vascular remodeling) have been demonstrated in various inbred mouse strains.10 Whether the development and severity of the injury-induced neointimal hyperplasia phenotype are also influenced by genetic factors has not been explored. Moreover, it is also unknown whether the genetic factors that dictate the severity of injury-induced vascular stenosis are similar to those that confer susceptibility to diet-induced atherosclerosis. This lack of information may be due to the difficulty encountered in genetic studies because of the diverse human population living under different environmental conditions. Because atherosclerosis-susceptible gene loci have already been identified by screening for atherosclerosis among various inbred strains of mice, the present study used a similar approach to explore the possible genetic influence on injury-induced neointimal hyperplasia. The results document the genetic influence on neointimal hyperplasia after endothelial denudation. Additionally, the data reveal that the genes that dictate susceptibility to injury-induced neointimal hyperplasia are different from those that determine susceptibility to diet-induced atherosclerosis.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Carotid Artery Injury
Mechanically induced arterial injury was performed by a modification of the guidewire method originally described by Lindner et al.11 In this modification,12 endothelial denudation was achieved by the insertion of an epoxy resin (Epon) probe that was made by forming an Epon bead slightly larger than the diameter of the carotid artery (
0.45 mm) on a 3-0 nylon suture. The animals were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection with a solution composed of ketamine (80 mg/kg body wt) and xylazine (16 mg/kg body wt) in 0.9% NaCl. After surgical exposure of the left carotid artery, it was ligated with a 7-0 suture at a site immediately proximal from the point of bifurcation. Another 7-0 suture was placed around the common carotid artery immediately distal from the branch point of the external carotid. A transverse arteriotomy was made between the 7-0 sutures, and the resin-beaded catheter was inserted into the carotid artery and advanced toward the aortic arch and withdrawn 5 times. Once blood flow was restored, the incision was closed, and the animals were allowed to recover in a 37°C heat box. The animals were then returned to their cages and were euthanized after 14 days.
Tissue Preparation and Histological Analysis
Angiocatheters were placed in the left ventricle of anesthetized mice for perfusion with 0.9% NaCl, followed by perfusion fixation with 10% buffered formalin (pH 7.0) for 20 minutes at a constant pressure of 100 mm Hg. The entire neck from each animal was dissected and placed in 10% buffered formalin for 48 hours. The whole neck was decalcified for an additional 48 hours and then embedded in paraffin. Identical 5-µm cross sections were made from the distal side of the neck, beginning at the point of the distally ligated 7-0 suture. For each animal, 4 whole-neck cross sections at 500-µm intervals were made. Parallel sections were subjected to hematoxylin and eosin staining and Verhoeffvan Gieson staining of the elastic laminae.
Morphometry
Data were collected from sections stained with Verhoeffvan Gieson dye. The injured left carotid arteries and the uninjured right carotid arteries in each section were measured and averaged. Images were digitized and captured by using a Sony video camera connected to a personal computer. For each section, measurements were made at a magnification of x200 by using a Scion Image Analysis computer program (Scion). The luminal area, the area inside the internal elastic lamina, and the area encircled by the external elastic lamina were measured in each section. The medial area was calculated as the area between the external and internal elastic laminae. Medial thickness was determined as the average linear distance between the internal and external elastic laminae, which was measured in 4 places 90° apart. The intimal area was calculated as the difference between the area inside the internal elastic lamina and the luminal area.
Serum Lipid and Lipoprotein Analysis
Blood was obtained from fasting mice through the retro-orbital plexus and centrifuged at 5000g for 10 minutes at 4°C to collect serum. Serum cholesterol level was determined by colorimetric assay kit (Wako Chemicals). Lipoprotein distribution was analyzed by fast-performance liquid chromatography with 2 tandem Superose 6 columns (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Two hundred microliters of serum from each mouse was applied to the columns, and 0.5-mL fractions were collected for cholesterol analysis. The lipoprotein elution profile was determined by comparison with standard VLDL, LDL, and HDL levels.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
In contrast to the results observed for medial area and thickness, significant differences were observed in the intima 14 days after endothelial denudation in the 5 different mouse strains. The most severe neointimal formation was observed in the C57L/J mice, with an average neointimal area of 17 110±7286 µm2. In contrast, the C57BL/6 mice displayed only minimal neointimal formation after arterial injury, with an average neointimal area of 2650±1500 µm2 (Figure 1). The other 3 strains of mice tested were also different in their response to arterial injury, with severity of neointimal formation in the order of FVB/N (14 470±6445 µm2)>129/Sv (8460±4638 µm2)>C3H (3350±2343 µm2), as shown in Figure 1.
Differences observed in neointimal formation after endothelial denudation in the various inbred strains of mice suggested a possible genetic influence on neointimal hyperplasia in response to arterial injury. This possibility was explored by breeding the most susceptible C57L/J mice with the most resistant C57BL/6 mice to obtain F1 hybrids of the 2 strains. Twenty-two F1 (C57BL/6xC57L/J) hybrids were obtained and characterized for arterial response to injury. As in the case with the parental strains, mechanically induced endothelial denudation resulted in increased medial area and thickness in the F1 hybrid mice. Interestingly, all 22 F1 hybrid mice were resistant to neointimal hyperplasia after arterial injury, with the intimal area less than or equal to that of the C57BL/6 mice (Figure 2).
|
The resistance of all (C57BL/6xC57L/J)F1 hybrid mice to neointimal hyperplasia after arterial injury suggested that the neointimal hyperplasia phenotype might be a recessive trait. The hypothesis was examined by backcrossing the F1 mice with the susceptible C57L/J mice to produce N2 hybrid mice for further studies. Arterial injury introduced into these N2 hybrid mice revealed a wide range of neointimal formation, spanning from the resistant phenotype to one with severe neointimal hyperplasia (Figure 3). A majority (72.7%) of the N2 hybrid mice displayed a minimal neointimal area (0 to 1000 µm2) that was similar to that observed in the parental C57BL/6 mice and in the F1 hybrid mice (data not shown). A small percentage (10.4%) of the N2 hybrid mice displayed severe neointimal formation (area >20 000 µm2) similar that present in the susceptible C57L/J strain (Figure 3). The rest of the N2 animals examined in the present study displayed an intermediate phenotype, with 9.1% of the mice displaying a neointimal area of 1 to 10 000 µm2 and 7.8% of the mice displaying a neointimal area of 10 to 20 000 µm2 (Figure 3). The distribution of neointima-susceptible and -resistant mice in the (C57BL/6xC57L/J) N2 cross suggests that there are
2 genes within the C57BL/6 genome that confer resistance to arterial injuryinduced neointimal hyperplasia.
|
The resistance of C57BL/6 mice to neointimal formation after arterial injury is in striking contrast to reports of their susceptibility to diet-induced atherosclerosis.14,15 One possible explanation for this difference is that the pathogenesis of these 2 vascular occlusive diseases proceeds by different mechanisms; hence, they are regulated by distinct genetic factors. Alternatively, the atherogenic diet used to promote atherosclerosis may contribute directly to vascular abnormalities that lead to lesion development. In the latter case, genes that confer susceptibility to atherosclerosis in the C57BL/6 mice may dictate the processing of the atherogenic diet; thus, the atherosclerosis observed in this mouse strain would be due to abnormalities in lipid and lipoprotein metabolism.16,17 To distinguish these possibilities, the C57BL/6 mice were placed on an atherogenic diet for 6 weeks before arterial injury. As reported previously by other investigators,18 these animals responded to the atherogenic diet with increased serum cholesterol levels and concomitant decreases in HDL levels (Figure 4). When the injured carotid arteries of these animals were examined 14 days after endothelial denudation, the animals fed the atherogenic diet were found to respond with increased medial area and thickness; this response was similar to that observed in mice fed the control chow diet (Figure 5). Interestingly, no difference in neointimal area was observed between animals fed either the control or the atherogenic diet (Figure 5). Importantly, the C57BL/6 mice fed the atherogenic diet were also resistant to injury-induced neointimal hyperplasia.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present study also showed that another inbred strain (C57L/J) was also a susceptible strain, with massive neointimal hyperplasia after injury. Thus, C57L/J mice and the C57BL/6 mice responded very differently to endothelial denudation despite the close relatedness of the 2 strains. It is also interesting to note that although both C57L/J and C57BL/6 mice have been shown to be highly susceptible to diet-induced atherosclerosis,14,15 they differ in susceptibility to injury-induced neointimal hyperplasia. This is in contrast to the C3H mice, which are resistant to diet-induced atherosclerosis14,15 and also to injury-induced neointimal hyperplasia. The observed difference in atherosclerosis and injury-induced neointimal hyperplasia for selected strains indicates that the susceptibility to diet-induced atherosclerosis and the susceptibility to injury-induced neointimal hyperplasia are mediated by distinct genes. This hypothesis is further supported by the observation that the atherosclerosis-resistant FVB/N mice20 developed severe neointimal hyperplasia in response to injury.
The demonstration of distinct genetic determinants for susceptibility to atherosclerosis and susceptibility to injury-induced neointimal hyperplasia adds to a growing amount of evidence indicating a distinct etiology for these 2 forms of vascular occlusive diseases. In addition to the obvious differences in pathology between the 2 types of lesions,7,2123 the role of inflammation in the vascular response to injury is also different from that in diet-induced atherosclerosis. For example, compared with immune-competent mice, mice with T-lymphocyte deficiency have reduced atherosclerosis.2427 In contrast, interferon-
secreted by lymphocytes was found to inhibit arterial stenosis after injury,28 and immune cell deficiency was found to exacerbate injury-induced neointimal hyperplasia in mice.29
Results from the present study also indicate that susceptibility to injury-induced neointimal hyperplasia is dictated by at least 2 recessive genes. This conclusion is derived from the following experiments: First, all of the F1 hybrid mice from the C57BL/6 and C57L/J intercross were resistant to neointimal hyperplasia, which suggests that resistance is the dominant trait. Second, the N2 backcross of the F1 hybrid mice with the susceptible C57L/J mice resulted in animals that displayed a range of arterial response to injury, spanning from severe neointimal hyperplasia to a resistant phenotype. A significant percentage of the N2 hybrid mice displayed an intermediate level of neointimal hyperplasia that was between the levels observed in the susceptible and resistant mice. If neointimal hyperplasia is controlled by a single recessive gene, then 50% of the N2 hybrid mice should display severe neointimal hyperplasia after arterial injury, whereas the other half of the animals should have a resistant phenotype. Our experimental observation, which deviates from the prediction based on mendelian genetics, suggests that susceptibility to injury-induced neointimal hyperplasia is dictated by >1 gene. Moreover, the skewed distribution in neointimal hyperplasia toward the resistant phenotype suggests that the susceptible trait is encoded by recessive alleles in >1 gene locus.
Previously, we have reported that overexpression of apoE is protective,12 whereas overexpression of insulin-like growth factor-1 exacerbates neointimal hyperplasia.13 Other studies have also shown the involvement of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1,30 angiotensin II type 1 receptor,31 and plasminogen32 in modulating the degree of neointimal formation after arterial injury in mice. Whether the difference in arterial response to injury between C57BL/6 and C57L/J mice is due to an alteration in the level of expression of these genes is unknown at this time. However, it is unlikely that the difference in arterial response to injury observed in the various inbred mouse strains is due to these genetic factors because these factors are also determinants of susceptibility to atherosclerosis. Accordingly, the identification of additional genes that uniquely regulate susceptibility to intimal hyperplasia may facilitate our understanding of the etiology of this vascular occlusive process. The identification of novel genes that dictate susceptibility to injury-induced neointimal hyperplasia may also contribute valuable information that can ultimately be used to identify subjects at risk for restenosis after vascular surgery, such that early preventive measures can be taken to minimize this debilitating adverse effect. Results of the present study with inbred mice set the stage for quantitative trait loci studies to identify the neointimal hyperplasiasusceptible genes.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received February 28, 2002; accepted April 1, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Orford JL, Selwyn AP, Ganz P, Popma JJ, Rogers C. The comparative pathobiology of atherosclerosis and restenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2000; 86 (suppl): 6H-11H.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Mintz GS, Popma JJ, Hong MK, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Satler LF, Leon MB. Intravascular ultrasound to discern device-specific effects and mechanisms of restenosis. Am J Cardiol. 1996; 78: 18-22.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Mintz GS, Popma JJ, Pichard AK, Kent KM, Satler LF, Wong C, Hong MK, Kovach JA, Leon MB. Arterial remodeling after coronary angioplasty: a serial intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. 1996; 94: 35-43.
5.
Pasterkamp G, de Kleijn DPV, Borst C. Arterial remodeling in atherosclerosis, restenosis, and after alteration of blood flow: potential mechanisms and clinical implications. Cardiovasc Res. 2000; 45: 843-852.
6.
Lowe HC, Oesterle SN, Khachigian LM. Coronary in-stent restenosis: current status and future strategies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 39: 183-193.
7. Virmani R, Farb A. Pathology of in-stent restenosis. Curr Opin Lipidol. 1999; 10: 499-506.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Duggirala R, Villalpando CG, OLeary DH, Stern MP, Blangero J. Genetic basis of variation in carotid wall thickness. Stroke. 1996; 27: 833-837.
9.
Assadnia S, Rapp JP, Nestor AL, Pringle T, Cerilli GJ, Gunning WT, Webb TH, Kligman M, Allison DC. Strain differences in neointimal hyperplasia in the rat. Circ Res. 1999; 84: 1252-1257.
10.
Harmon KJ, Couper LL, Lindner V. Strain-dependent vascular remodeling phenotypes in inbred mice. Am J Pathol. 2000; 156: 1741-1748.
11.
Lindner V, Fingerle J, Reidy MA. Mouse model of arterial injury. Circ Res. 1993; 73: 792-796.
12.
Zhu B, Kuhel DG, Witte DP, Hui DY. Apolipoprotein E inhibits neointimal hyperplasia after arterial injury in mice. Am J Pathol. 2000; 157: 1839-1848.
13.
Zhu B, Zhao G, Witte DP, Hui DY, Fagin JA. Targeted overexpression of IGF-1 in smooth muscle cells of transgenic mice enhances neointimal formation through increased proliferation and cell migration after intraarterial injury. Endocrinology. 2001; 142: 3598-3606.
14. Paigen B, Morrow A, Brandon C, Mitchell D, Holmes PA. Variation in susceptibility to atherosclerosis among inbred strains of mice. Atherosclerosis. 1985; 57: 65-73.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Ishida BY, Paigen B. Atherosclerosis in the mouse. Monogr Hum Genet. 1989; 12: 189-222.
16.
Lusis AJ, Taylor BA, Wangenstein RW, LeBoeuf RC. Genetic control of lipid transport in mice, II: genes controlling structure of high density lipoproteins. J Biol Chem. 1983; 258: 5071-5078.
17. Lusis AJ. Genetic factors affecting blood lipoproteins: the candidate gene approach. J Lipid Res. 1988; 29: 397-429.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Paigen B, Mitchell D, Reue K, Morrow A, Lusis AJ., LeBoeuf RC. Ath-1, a gene determining atherosclerosis susceptibility and high density lipoprotein levels in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987; 84: 37633767.
19.
Kumar A, Lindner V. Remodeling with neointima formation in the mouse carotid artery after cessation of blood flow. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997; 17: 2238-2244.
20.
Dansky HM, Charlton SA, Sikes JL, Heath SC. Simantov R, Levin LF, Shu P, Moore KJ, Breslow JL, Smith JD. Genetic background determines the extent of atherosclerosis in apoE-deficient mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999; 19: 1960-1968.
21.
Kiechl S, Willeit J. The natural course of atherosclerosis, I: incidence and progression. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999; 19: 1484-1490.
22.
Kiechl S, Willeit J. The natural course of atherosclerosis, II: vascular remodeling. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999; 19: 1491-1498.
23.
Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Farb A, Schwartz SM. Lessons from sudden coronary death: a comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000; 20: 1262-1275.
24. Emeson EE, Shen ML, Bell CGH, Qureshi A. Inhibition of atherosclerosis in CD4 T-cell-ablated and Nude (nu/nu) C57BL/6 hyperlipidemic mice. Am J Pathol. 1996; 149: 675-685.[Abstract]
25.
Dansky HM, Charlton SA, Harper MM, Smith JD. T and B lymphocytes play a minor role in atherosclerotic plaque formation in the apolipoprotein E-deficient mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94: 46424646.
26.
Reardon CA, Blachowicz L, White T, Cabana V, Wang Y, Lukens J, Bluestone J, Getz GS. Effect of immune deficiency on lipoproteins and atherosclerosis in male apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001; 21: 1011-1016.
27. Song L, Leung C, Schindler C. Lymphocytes are important in early atherosclerosis. J Clin Invest. 2001; 108: 251-259.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Hansson GK, Holm J. Interferon-gamma inhibits arterial stenosis after injury. Circulation. 1991; 84: 1266-1272.
29.
Zhu B, Reardon CA, Getz GS, Hui DY. Both apolipoprotein E- and immune-deficiency exacerbate neointimal hyperplasia after vascular injury in mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002; 22: 450-455.
30.
Carmeliet P, Moons L, Lijnen R, Janssens S, Lupu F, Collen D, Gerard RD. Inhibitory role of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in arterial wound healing and neointima formation: a gene targeting and gene transfer study in mice. Circulation. 1997; 96: 3180-3191.
31.
Harada K, Komuro I, Sugaya T, Murakami K, Yazaki Y. Vascular injury causes neointimal formation in angiotensin II type 1a receptor knockout mice. Circ Res. 1999; 84: 179-185.
32.
Lijnen HR, Van Hoef B, Lupu F, Moons L, Carmeliet P, Collen D. Function of the plasminogen/plasmin and matrix metalloproteinase systems after vascular injury in mice with targeted inactivation of fibrinolytic system genes. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998; 18: 1035-1045.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. E. Basford, Z. W.Q. Moore, L. Zhou, J. Herz, and D. Y. Hui Smooth Muscle LDL Receptor-Related Protein-1 Inactivation Reduces Vascular Reactivity and Promotes Injury-Induced Neointima Formation Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, November 1, 2009; 29(11): 1772 - 1778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Takahashi Genetic Susceptibility to Restenosis: Role of Bone Marrow Cells and Inflammatory Response Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, October 1, 2009; 29(10): 1407 - 1408. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Gordon, C. Pagiatakis, J. Salma, M. Du, J. J. Andreucci, J. Zhao, G. Hou, R. L. Perry, Q. Dan, D. Courtman, et al. Protein Kinase A-regulated Assembly of a MEF2{middle dot}HDAC4 Repressor Complex Controls c-Jun Expression in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells J. Biol. Chem., July 10, 2009; 284(28): 19027 - 19042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Yuan, H. Pei, D. J. Roberts, Z. Zhang, J. S. Rowlan, A. H. Matsumoto, and W. Shi Quantitative Trait Locus Analysis of Neointimal Formation in an Intercross Between C57BL/6 and C3H/HeJ Apolipoprotein E-Deficient Mice Circ Cardiovasc Genet, June 1, 2009; 2(3): 220 - 228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Lasater, W. K. Bessler, L. E. Mead, W. E. Horn, D. W. Clapp, S. J. Conway, D. A. Ingram, and F. Li Nf1+/- mice have increased neointima formation via hyperactivation of a Gleevec sensitive molecular pathway Hum. Mol. Genet., August 1, 2008; 17(15): 2336 - 2344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Zhang, P. Sivashanmugam, J.-H. Wu, L. Brian, S. T. Exum, N. J. Freedman, and K. Peppel Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-2 Signaling Attenuates Vein Graft Neointima Formation by Promoting Endothelial Recovery Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, February 1, 2008; 28(2): 284 - 289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Shimizu, T. Nakazawa, A. Cho, F. Dastvan, D. Shilling, G. Daum, and M. A. Reidy Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptor 2 Negatively Regulates Neointimal Formation in Mouse Arteries Circ. Res., November 9, 2007; 101(10): 995 - 1000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. W. Q. Moore and D. Y. Hui Apolipoprotein E inhibition of vascular hyperplasia and neointima formation requires inducible nitric oxide synthase J. Lipid Res., October 1, 2005; 46(10): 2083 - 2090. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Heissig, S. Rafii, H. Akiyama, Y. Ohki, Y. Sato, T. Rafael, Z. Zhu, D. J. Hicklin, K. Okumura, H. Ogawa, et al. Low-dose irradiation promotes tissue revascularization through VEGF release from mast cells and MMP-9-mediated progenitor cell mobilization J. Exp. Med., September 19, 2005; 202(6): 739 - 750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Shi, H. Pei, J. J. Fischer, J. C. James, J. F. Angle, A. H. Matsumoto, G. A. Helm, and I. J. Sarembock Neointimal formation in two apolipoprotein E-deficient mouse strains with different atherosclerosis susceptibility J. Lipid Res., November 1, 2004; 45(11): 2008 - 2014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Xu Mouse Models of Arteriosclerosis: From Arterial Injuries to Vascular Grafts Am. J. Pathol., July 1, 2004; 165(1): 1 - 10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. W.Q. Moore, B. Zhu, D. G. Kuhel, and D. Y. Hui Vascular Apolipoprotein E Expression and Recruitment from Circulation to Modulate Smooth Muscle Cell Response to Endothelial Denudation Am. J. Pathol., June 1, 2004; 164(6): 2109 - 2116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Phillips, K. G. Barringhaus, J. M. Sanders, Z. Yang, M. Chen, S. Hesselbacher, A. C. Czarnik, K. Ley, J. Nadler, and I. J. Sarembock Rosiglitazone Reduces the Accelerated Neointima Formation After Arterial Injury in a Mouse Injury Model of Type 2 Diabetes Circulation, October 21, 2003; 108(16): 1994 - 1999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Zhang, J. Ren, M. F. Khan, A. M. Cheng, D. Abendschein, and A. J. Muslin Grb2 Is Required for the Development of Neointima in Response to Vascular Injury Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, October 1, 2003; 23(10): 1788 - 1793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Y. Liu, A. K. Death, and D. J. Handelsman Androgens and Cardiovascular Disease Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2003; 24(3): 313 - 340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Hodgin and N. Maeda Minireview: Estrogen and Mouse Models of Atherosclerosis Endocrinology, December 1, 2002; 143(12): 4495 - 4501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Cho and M. A. Reidy Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Is Necessary for the Regulation of Smooth Muscle Cell Replication and Migration After Arterial Injury Circ. Res., November 1, 2002; 91(9): 845 - 851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Wang and B. Paigen Comparative Genetics of Atherosclerosis and Restenosis: Exploration With Mouse Models Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, June 1, 2002; 22(6): 884 - 886. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2002 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |