Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2002;22:1018-1022
Published online before print April 4, 2002, doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000017470.08363.AB
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/6/1018    most recent
01.ATV.0000017470.08363.ABv1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Folsom, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by White, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Folsom, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by White, R. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Energy metabolism
Right arrow Metabolism
(Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2002;22:1018.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Thrombosis

Protein C, Antithrombin, and Venous Thromboembolism Incidence

A Prospective Population-Based Study

Aaron R. Folsom; Nena Aleksic; Lu Wang; Mary Cushman; Kenneth K. Wu; Richard H. White

From the Division of Epidemiology (A.R.F., L.W.), School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; the Division of Hematology (N.A., K.K.W.), University of Texas Medical School, Houston; the Department of Medicine (M.C.), University of Vermont, Burlington; and the Division of General Medicine (R.H.W.), University of California-Davis, Sacramento.

Correspondence to Aaron R. Folsom, MD, Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Suite 300, 1300 South Second St, Minneapolis, MN 55454-1015. E-mail folsom{at}epi.umn.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract Although deficiencies of protein C and antithrombin, 2 natural plasma anticoagulants, are known risk factors for venous thrombosis, population-based prospective incidence data on these associations are lacking. Venous thromboembolic events have been identified in adults in 2 longitudinal cohort studies, the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study and the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS). Incidence was examined in relation to prediagnostic plasma levels of protein C (ARIC Study only) and antithrombin. Over a mean of 8.1 years of follow-up, there were 130 incident venous thromboembolic events that were not due to cancer in the ARIC Study. The age-adjusted incidence was elevated 3.36-fold (95% CI 1.24 to 9.11) in the 1.1% of subjects with protein C values <2.0 mg/L compared with subjects with higher values. In contrast, in the ARIC Study and the CHS, there was no association between low plasma antithrombin and venous thromboembolism. In conclusion, in this population-based study, a low protein C, but not antithrombin, level has been determined to be associated with an increased incidence of venous thromboembolism. Attributable risk estimates suggest that low protein C levels account for {approx}2.5% of venous thromboembolic events in the ARIC population.


Key Words: antithrombin • protein C • prospective study • venous thrombosis • pulmonary embolus


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Deficiencies of protein C and antithrombin, 2 natural plasma anticoagulants, are known contributors to familial venous thrombosis. Type I deficiency is defined by the reduction of the functional activity and plasma antigen levels of the anticoagulant; type II deficiency is defined by reduced activity but normal antigen levels. Deficient protein C or antithrombin is typically present in 4% to 9% of the patients with familial thrombophilia.1 In unselected patients with venous thrombosis, deficiencies of protein C and antithrombin are less common ({approx}3% and 1%, respectively).24 In contrast, the prevalence of protein C deficiency in the general population has been estimated to be between 0.2% and 0.4%,5,6 and the prevalence of type I antithrombin deficiency has been estimated to be 0.02%.7 A number of mutations of the protein C and antithrombin genes contribute to deficiencies of these anticoagulant proteins.1 In middle-aged carriers of such mutations, the incidence of venous thrombosis is {approx}1% per year and is somewhat higher for antithrombin than for protein C deficiency.811 Lifestyle and other physiological factors contribute modestly to variations in protein C and antithrombin levels in the population.12,13

Rosendaal14 has estimated the population attributable risk (ie, the proportion of venous thrombosis caused by a risk factor) to be 2% for protein C deficiency and <1% for antithrombin deficiency and much less for activated protein C resistance or elevated factor VIII. To our knowledge, there has been no longitudinal study of the general population relating levels of protein C or antithrombin to incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE). We undertook the present study to test the hypothesis that low levels of these natural anticoagulants are associated with increased VTE incidence in the general population.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Study Population and Baseline Assessments
The Longitudinal Investigation of Thromboembolism Etiology (LITE) Study is a prospective study of VTE occurrence in 2 pooled, multicenter, longitudinal, population-based cohort studies: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study and the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS). The LITE Study design, methods, and VTE incidence rates have been described in detail elsewhere.15,17 In brief, 15 792 ARIC participants aged 45 to 64 years at baseline in 1987 to 1989 and 5201 CHS participants aged >=65 years at baseline in 1989 to 1990 underwent assessments of cardiovascular risk factors. An additional 687 African Americans were recruited to CHS in 1992 to 1993. Baseline cardiovascular risk factors included in the present study were measured comparably in the ARIC Study and the CHS, as described elsewhere.15

After informed consent was obtained, blood was drawn from fasting participants in the morning in both studies. The blood samples were stored briefly on ice (ARIC Study) and at room temperature (CHS), then centrifuged for 3000g for 10 minutes, and stored in -70°C freezers. Up to 3 follow-up examinations were performed every 3 years in the ARIC Study, and up to 9 follow-up examinations were performed annually in the CHS. Blood samples from the subsequent examinations were stored at -70°C.

VTE Case Identification
Potential cases of VTE were identified from baseline through September 1998. Hospital records were obtained, and VTE events were validated by 2 physicians as "definite deep vein thrombosis (DVT)" (nearly always having a positive duplex ultrasound or a positive venogram), "probable DVT" (having a positive Doppler ultrasound or a positive impedance plethysmography), and "definite PE" (having ventilation-perfusion scans with multiple segmental or subsegmental mismatched defects, a positive pulmonary angiogram, or CT or autopsy documentation of pulmonary embolism [PE]). Definite and probable DVT and definite PE were pooled as VTE for this analysis. Cases were also classified as incident (no self-reported VTE history before baseline) or recurrent (self-reported VTE history before baseline) and as idiopathic (no obvious cause) or secondary (associated with cancer, major trauma, surgery, or marked immobility). In the ARIC Study, 185 individuals developed VTE; 150 developed VTE in the CHS. Of the 335 events, 237 had venous thrombosis only, 52 had PE only, and 46 had both.

Study Designs
Two study designs were used to accomplish our aims. In the ARIC Study, but not in the CHS, plasma protein C and antithrombin were measured for all participants,12,13 thus allowing a traditional cohort analysis. Because the CHS had not measured these factors, we decided to measure antithrombin, the rarer of the 2 deficiencies, on cases and controls from the LITE Study (ie, remeasured in the ARIC Study and first-measured in the CHS). This subcohort is referred to as the "LITE cases and controls." We also measured factor V Leiden in the LITE cases and controls.17 The controls were selected at random from the ARIC and CHS cohorts at a ratio of 2.1 controls per VTE case and were frequency-matched to the cases by age (5-year groupings), sex, race (black or white), follow-up time (case’s event date within 2 years of control’s assigned date), and study (ARIC Study or CHS).

Stored samples of DNA and plasma for cases and controls were retrieved from storage freezers. If baseline plasma samples were limited, previously thawed, or exhausted for a participant, a sample was retrieved from the plasma repository for the next visit ({approx}3 years after baseline); if neither sample was available, it was considered missing. The percentages of ARIC subjects having plasma from baseline, the year 3 visit, or missing were 65%, 25%, and 10%, respectively. The respective percentages for CHS plasma were 80%, 14%, and 6%. The percentage of missing samples did not significantly differ between cases and controls. For only 12 cases in the LITE Study, we used blood drawn after the VTE. For factor V Leiden, 8% of the ARIC participants and 10% of the CHS participants had missing samples or refused consent for use of their DNA.

Laboratory Methods
Protein C antigen was measured at the ARIC baseline by using a commercial ELISA kit (Asserachrom Protein C, Diagnostica Stago). Low protein C values were repeated and confirmed. The coefficient of variation for protein C was 12%; the reliability coefficient (between-subject variance divided by total variance) obtained from repeated testing of individuals over several weeks was 0.56.18 Antithrombin was assayed at the ARIC baseline with an amidolytic assay using a synthetic chromogenic substrate for thrombin (CBS 34.47, Diagnostica Stago) and bovine thrombin (Kabi). The test may be influenced by heparin cofactor II. The antithrombin values (percentages) were obtained by relating the optical density of the unknown samples to a calibration curve that was constructed with each run by use of a lyophilized plasma pool (University Coagulation Reference Plasma ThromboScreen, Pacific Hemostasis) as the standard. Low antithrombin values (values <50%) were repeated and confirmed. The coefficient of variation for antithrombin was 12%; the reliability coefficient assessed by repeat visits over several weeks was 0.42.18

Antithrombin was measured in the LITE Study (remeasured in the ARIC Study and first-measured in the CHS) by use of an automated chromogenic assay (IL Test Antithrombin) based on bovine factor Xa19; an ACL Futura Coagulation System (Instrumentation Laboratory) was used. The method is specific and is not influenced by heparin cofactor II. Within-run coefficients of variation were 3% for normal values and 4% for low values of antithrombin. Low values of antithrombin were repeated and confirmed. The reliability coefficient based on 15 split specimens, which were stored for a long time and then analyzed, was r=0.38. Because the ARIC Study had stored samples briefly on ice and the CHS had stored samples at room temperature, we conducted a pilot study (n=10) processing split normal plasma samples both ways. The mean±SD antithrombin values were 106±9 for room temperature and 110±12 for cold processing (r=0.72).

We detected the presence or absence of the factor V Leiden (1691G->A, R506Q) mutation and the prothrombin 20210G->A polymorphism on LITE cases and controls by using standard methods.20,21 Factor VIII coagulant activity (VIIIc) was measured by a Coag-a-MateX2 (Organon-Teknika) with the use of factor immunodeficient plasmas (Organon-Teknika).

Statistical Analyses
A traditional longitudinal analysis was used to analyze protein C and antithrombin measured at baseline in the ARIC Study. Because the focus was on incident VTE–unrelated cancer, we first excluded 276 participants who reported at baseline a history of VTE, 874 who reported a history of cancer, 87 who reported baseline anticoagulant use, and 273 who had missing blood measurements (a total of 1434 were excluded; some had >1 exclusion). This left 14 358 subjects at risk to be followed longitudinally. Rates of VTE not due to cancer were calculated for 2 definitions of low protein C and antithrombin, namely, <1 percentile (2.0 mg/L for protein C and <65% for antithrombin) and <5 percentile (2.3 mg/L for protein C and <80% for antithrombin). Relative risks (RRs [hazard ratios]) and 95% CIs were calculated by using Cox proportional hazards models. The dose-response relation for protein C was examined graphically by using a restricted cubic spline model.22 The hazard ratio was plotted relative to a value of 3.7 mg/L, which was approximately the 80th percentile.

For antithrombin in the LITE nested case-control sample, we also restricted analyses to incident events and excluded 51 participants with a history of VTE, 130 with a history of cancer, and 19 with baseline anticoagulant use. There were 219 cases (the ARIC Study plus the CHS) and 529 controls remaining for analyses. We used unconditional logistic regression to calculate odds ratios and 95% CIs of VTE in relation to antithrombin <1 percentile (55%) and <5 percentile (65%).

A number of lifestyle, physiological, and hemostatic factors have already been evaluated for their association with VTE in the LITE cohort.15 Adjustment was made in the ARIC and LITE analyses for factors previously associated with VTE, including age (continuous) in all models and race, sex, body mass index (continuous), and factor VIIIc (continuous) in multivariate models.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The ARIC cohort at baseline was aged 45 to 64 years (mean 54 years); 72% were white, and 28% were black. The LITE cases of VTE and controls at baseline were aged 45 to 94 years (mean 64 years); 74% were white, and 26% were black. Approximately 14% of cases and 4% of controls carried factor V Leiden,17 and 4% of cases and 2% of controls carried the prothrombin 20210A polymorphism.

In the ARIC baseline cohort in 1987 to 1989, the mean±SD for protein C was 3.17±0.62 mg/L; for antithrombin, it was 111±22%. By use of a different assay and stored samples, the baseline mean antithrombin was 90±16% in LITE VTE cases and controls. By the different assays, the 2 antithrombin values for the ARIC participants were correlated (r=0.36).

Over a mean of 8.1 years of follow-up, there were 130 incident VTE events unrelated to cancer in the ARIC Study (incidence rate 1.10 per 1000 person-years). The prevalence of protein C values <2.0 mg/L was 3.2% (n=4) among the VTE cases versus 1.1% (n=156) in all of the ARIC Study. Compared with higher values, the age-adjusted incidence of VTE was elevated 3.36-fold in subjects with protein C values <2.0 mg/L (Table). With adjustment for age, race, sex, body mass index, and factor VIIIc, this RR was unchanged (3.38, 95% CI 1.24 to 9.20). VTE incidence was elevated only 1.19-fold for protein C values <2.3 mg/L (Table).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Prevalences of Low Levels of Protein C and Antithrombin III and Associations With Incident VTE Not Due to Cancer

By use of a cubic spline method (Figure), it appeared that the RR of VTE began rising at protein C values <2.5 mg/L and that it might rise to an RR of 4 at protein C levels <=1.5 mg/L. (A total of 33 ARIC subjects had protein C values <=1.5 mg/L.) VTE risk was fairly constant at protein C values >2.5 mg/L.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
The distribution of protein C is represented by the bell-shaped curve (and the right scale). The other solid dark line (and the left scale) represents the RRs for various values of protein C based on a cubic spline model. The dotted lines are the 95% CIs for the RRs.

Low antithrombin, in contrast, did not seem to be associated with the incidence of VTE in the ARIC Study or with the odds of incident VTE in the LITE sample involving the ARIC Study and the CHS (Table). This conclusion was unchanged after the restricted cubic spline method was used in the ARIC Study or deciles of the distribution were used in the LITE Study. There also was no association with multivariate adjustment for age, race, sex, body mass index, or factor VIIIc.

Combinations of deficiencies have been reported to greatly increase VTE risk.23,24 However, these combinations in relation to protein C and antithrombin are relatively rare in the general population. In the ARIC Study, only 3 people at baseline had both protein C <2.0 mg/L and antithrombin <=65%; none of them had VTE events during follow-up. In the LITE Study, no one had this combination of low protein C and low antithrombin, nor did anyone have 1 of these in combination with factor V Leiden.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In the prospective population-based ARIC Study of adults (mean age 54 years), the incidence of VTE not due to cancer was increased in participants with low levels of protein C. The risk of VTE was not reduced further by high levels of protein C, consistent with a threshold. For a protein C value <2.0 mg/L, present in 1.1% of the population, VTE incidence was 3.5 per 1000 person-years; in other words, it was 3.36 times (95% CI 1.2 to 9.1) the VTE rate of those with higher protein C values. This incidence rate of 3.5 per 1000 person-years is approximately the same as the incidence rates reported by some studies of presumed or known carriers of mutations for protein C deficiency,10,11 but it is approximately half the incidence rates reported by other studies.8,9 Our RR estimate is similar to RR estimates from population-based case-control studies with similar ages: RR 3.1 (95% CI 1.4 to 7.0) in the Leiden Thrombophilia Study,2 which had a mean age of 47, and RR 2.9 (95% CI 1.1 to 8.1) in an Oxford study of 45- to 64-year-old women.25 Thus, population-based studies suggest a 3-fold increased risk of VTE that is based on a single measurement of low protein C. This is half the RR of VTE for DNA-confirmed protein C deficiency.2 On the basis of an observed prevalence of low protein C of 1.1% and an RR of 3.36, {approx}2.5% of VTE in this ARIC sample might be due to low protein C. This figure is similar to Rosendaal’s estimate14 of the population attributable risk of 2% for protein C deficiency.

We found no association between low levels of antithrombin and VTE incidence in these subjects aged >45 years. In contrast, the 2 previous population-based case-control studies found low levels of antithrombin to increase VTE risk. RR estimates were 2.2 (95% CI 1.0 to 4.7) in the Leiden Thrombophilia Study2 and 3.3 (95% CI 1.2 to 9.7) in the Oxford study.25 One possible reason for this discrepancy is that we undoubtedly had few participants with true antithrombin deficiency in the lowest 1% of the antithrombin distribution, given an estimated prevalence of deficiency of 0.02%7 and the fact that we excluded those with a past history of VTE. Previous case-control studies also have used liberal definitions of antithrombin deficiency that yielded prevalences of 1.9% among controls in the Leiden study and 6% among controls in the Oxford study. Varying the cut point for our definition of deficiency did not change our null result. Another possibility for the lack of association is that our antithrombin assay may have been insufficiently accurate to identify the few truly antithrombin-deficient subjects. A final possibility is that the older age of the LITE sample led to a null finding, but the analysis based on middle-aged ARIC subjects was also null.

It has been pointed out that inherited anticoagulant defects, including factor V Leiden, may cluster together in many hereditary venous thrombosis cases.23,24 Many of these cases manifest VTE early in life. However, our data suggest that the clustering of low protein C and low antithrombin, or these in combination with factor V Leiden, is relatively rare in the general population and among patients with VTE onset after the age of 45 years.

Although this is the first prospective study of VTE incidence in relation to low levels of protein C and antithrombin, it has some limitations. First, low levels were defined arbitrarily as the lowest {approx}1% of participants. Deficiency was not confirmed by a repeat measurement from a separate blood draw or by DNA analysis, as might be done in clinical practice. Thus, our sample with deficiency or not suffers from some misclassification. Second, protein C and antithrombin had low reliability (ie, high method variance plus intraindividual variance), which would attenuate regression coefficients by {approx}50%. Thus, because of misclassification, the true RR estimates are undoubtedly higher than reported, and the dose-response relation depicted in the Figure may be underestimated. Third, because deficiencies are relatively rare, few participants had low values, even with our large sample size. Because VTE due to protein C or antithrombin deficiency often occurs early in life, some people with known deficiencies might have chosen at baseline not to take part in the ARIC Study. Finally, our antigen-based protein C assay would have detected only the more common type I, and not type II, deficiency.

We excluded from analysis participants with a baseline history of VTE or anticoagulant therapy, as is appropriate for an incidence cohort. We also excluded participants with cancer. Compared with those not excluded, those excluded had an {approx}1% higher prevalence of low protein C but a similar prevalence of low antithrombin. To determine whether these exclusions affected our findings, we repeated the analyses without exclusions. The RRs for low protein C were only slightly different from those in the Table: RR 1.43 (95% CI 0.73 to 2.80) for protein C <2.3 mg/L and RR 3.27 (95% CI 1.34 to 7.98) for protein C <2.0 mg/L. The RRs for antithrombin, without exclusions, were virtually identical to those in the Table.

In conclusion, we provide prospective evidence that low protein C levels in adults more than 45 years old is associated with a >3-fold increase in VTE incidence. The rarity of protein C deficiency meant that it accounted for {approx}2.5% of the VTE events in this cohort. In contrast, we found no relationship between low antithrombin levels and VTE incidence.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This research was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grant R01-HL59367 (LITE), contracts N01-HC-55015, N01-HC-55016, N01-HC-55018, N01-HC-55019, N01-HC-55020, N01-HC-55021, and N01-HC-55022 for the ARIC Study and contracts N01-HC-85079 to N01-HC-85086 for the CHS. The authors thank the staff and participants of the ARIC and CHS projects for their long-term contributions and Wayne Rosamond, Susan Heckbert, David Yanez, and Laura Kemmis for technical assistance.

Received February 4, 2002; accepted March 25, 2002.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Lane DA, Mannucci PM, Bauer KA, Bertina RM, Bochkov NP, Boulyjenkov V, Chandy M, Dahlback B, Ginter EK, Miletich JP, Rosendaal FR, Seligsohn U. Inherited thrombophilia: part 1. Thromb Haemost. 1996; 76: 651–662.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Koster T, Rosendaal FR, Briet E, van der Meer FJ, Colly LP, Trienekens PH, Poort SR, Reitsma PH, Vandenbroucke JP. Protein C deficiency in a controlled series of unselected outpatients: an infrequent but clear risk factor for venous thrombosis (Leiden Thrombophilia Study). Blood. 1995; 85: 2756–2761.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Heijboer H, Brandjes DP, Buller HR, Sturk A, ten Cate JW. Deficiencies of coagulation-inhibiting and fibrinolytic proteins in outpatients with deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 1990; 323: 1512–1516.[Abstract]

4. Mateo J, Oliver A, Borrell M, Sala N, Fontcuberta J. Laboratory evaluation and clinical characteristics of 2,132 consecutive unselected patients with venous thromboembolism: results of the Spanish Multicentric Study on Thrombophilia (EMET-Study). Thromb Haemost. 1997; 77: 444–451.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Tait RC, Walker ID, Reitsma PH, Islam SI, McCall F, Poort SR, Conkie JA, Bertina RM. Prevalence of protein C deficiency in the healthy population. Thromb Haemost. 1995; 73: 87–93.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Miletich J, Sherman L, Broze G Jr. Absence of thrombosis in subjects with heterozygous protein C deficiency. N Engl J Med. 1987; 317: 991–996.[Abstract]

7. Tait RC, Walker ID, Perry DJ, Islam SI, Daly ME, McCall F, Conkie JA, Carrell RW. Prevalence of antithrombin deficiency in the healthy population. Br J Haematol. 1994; 87: 106–112.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Allaart CF, Poort SR, Rosendaal FR, Reitsma PH, Bertina RM, Briet E. Increased risk of venous thrombosis in carriers of hereditary protein C deficiency defect. Lancet. 1993; 341: 134–138.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Sanson BJ, Simioni P, Tormene D, Moia M, Friederich PW, Huisman MV, Prandoni P, Bura A, Rejto L, Wells P, Mannucci PM, Girolami A, Buller HR, Prins MH. The incidence of venous thromboembolism in asymptomatic carriers of a deficiency of antithrombin, protein C, or protein S: a prospective cohort study. Blood. 1999; 94: 3702–3706.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Bucciarelli P, Rosendaal FR, Tripodi A, Mannucci PM, De Stefano V, Palareti G, Finazzi G, Baudo F, Quintavalla R. Risk of venous thromboembolism and clinical manifestations in carriers of antithrombin, protein C, protein S deficiency, or activated protein C resistance: a multicenter collaborative family study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999; 19: 1026–1033.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Simioni P, Sanson BJ, Prandoni P, Moia M, Friederich PW, Huisman MV, Prandoni P, Bura A, Rejto L, Wells P, Mannucci PM, Girolami A, Buller HR, Prins MH. Incidence of venous thromboembolism in families with inherited thrombophilia. Thromb Haemost. 1999; 81: 198–202.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Conlan MG, Folsom AR, Finch A, Davis CE, Sorlie P, Wu KK. Correlation of plasma protein C levels with cardiovascular risk factors in middle-aged adults: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Thromb Haemost. 1993; 70: 762–767.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Conlan MG, Folsom AR, Finch A, Davis CE, Marcucci G, Sorlie P, Wu KK. Antithrombin III: associations with age, race, sex and cardiovascular disease risk factors. Thromb Haemost. 1994; 72: 551–556.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Rosendaal FR. Risk factors for venous thrombotic disease. Thromb Haemost. 1999; 82: 610–619.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Tsai AW, Cushman M, Rosamond WD, Heckbert SR, Polak JF, Folsom AR. Cardiovascular risk factors and venous thromboembolism incidence: the Longitudinal Investigation of Thromboembolism Etiology (LITE) Study. Arch Intern Med. In press.

16. Deleted in proof.

17. Folsom AR, Cushman M, Tsai MY, Aleksic N, Heckbert SR, Boland LL, Tsai AW, Yanez ND, Rosamond WD. A prospective study of venous thromboembolism in relation to factor V Leiden and related factors. Blood. 2002; 99: 2720–2725.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Chambless LE, McMahon R, Wu K, Folsom A, Finch A, Shen YL. Short-term intra-individual variability in hemostasis factors: the ARIC Study. Ann Epidemiol. 1992; 2: 723–733.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Demers C, Henderson P, Blajchman MA, Wells MJ, Mitchell L, Johnston M, Ofosu FA, Fernandez-Rachubinski F, Andrew M, Hirsh J. An antithrombin III assay based on factor Xa inhibition provides a more reliable test to identify congenital antithrombin III deficiency than an assay based on thrombin inhibition. Thromb Haemost. 1993; 69: 231–235.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. de Ronde H, Bertina RM. Laboratory diagnosis of APC-resistance: a critical evaluation of the test and the development of diagnostic criteria. Thromb Haemost. 1994; 72: 880–886.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Poort SR, Rosendaal FR, Reitsma PH, Bertina RM. A common genetic variation in the 3'-untranslated region of the prothrombin gene is associated with elevated plasma prothrombin levels and an increase in venous thrombosis. Blood. 1996; 88: 3698–3703.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Greenland S. Dose-response and trend analysis in epidemiology: alternatives to categorical analysis. Epidemiology. 1995; 6: 356–365.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Koeleman BP, Reitsma PH, Allaart CF, Bertina RM. Activated protein C resistance as an additional risk factor for thrombosis in protein C-deficient families. Blood. 1994; 84: 1031–1035.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. van Boven HH, Reitsma PH, Rosendaal FR, Bayston TA, Chowdhury V, Bauer KA, Scharrer I, Conard J, Lane DA. Factor V Leiden (FV R506Q) in families with inherited antithrombin deficiency. Thromb Haemost. 1996; 75: 417–421.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Lowe G, Woodward M, Vessey M, Rumley A, Gough P, Daly E. Thrombotic variables and risk of idiopathic venous thromboembolism in women aged 45–64 years: relationships to hormone replacement therapy. Thromb Haemost. 2000; 83: 530–535.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ASH Education BookHome page
J. A. Heit
Thrombophilia: Common Questions on Laboratory Assessment and Management
Hematology, January 1, 2007; 2007(1): 127 - 135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
R. D. McBane II
Genetically Determined Procoagulant States and Heparin Use
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, December 1, 2003; 7(4): 427 - 442.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism
Thorax, June 1, 2003; 58(6): 470 - 483.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/6/1018    most recent
01.ATV.0000017470.08363.ABv1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Folsom, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by White, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Folsom, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by White, R. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Energy metabolism
Right arrow Metabolism