Published online before print April 4, 2002, doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000017473.78775.F6
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.
Atherosclerosis and Lipoproteins |
Genetic Influences on Aortic Root Size in American Indians
The Strong Heart Study
From Department of Medicine (J.N.B., M.J.R., R.B.D.), Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; the Department of Genetics (J.W.M., L.A., K.E.N.), Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research, San Antonio, Tex; Aberdeen Area Tribal Chairmen’s Health Board (T.K.W.), Rapid City, SD; University of Oklahoma School of Public Health Services (E.T.L.), Oklahoma City; the Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications (R.R.F.), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Md; and Medstar Research Institute (B.V.H.), Washington, DC.
Correspondence to Jonathan N. Bella, MD, Division of Cardiology (12th Floor), Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1650 Grand Concourse, Bronx, NY 10457. E-mail jonnbella{at}earthlink.net Reprint requests to Richard B. Devereux, MD, Division of Cardiology, Box 222, The New York-Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th St; New York, NY 10021. E-mail rbdevere@med.cornell.edu
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Abstract— Aortic root dilatation is a major pathophysiological mechanism for aortic regurgitation and predisposes the aortic root to dissection or rupture. However, only a small proportion of the variance of aortic root size can be explained by its known clinical and demographic correlates. The present study was undertaken to determine the heritability of echocardiographically derived aortic root diameter in the American Indian participants in the second Strong Heart Study examination. Echocardiograms were analyzed in 1373 SHS participants who had
1 family member in the cohort. Heritability calculations were performed by using variance component analysis as implemented in SOLAR, a computer analysis program. In a polygenic model, the variables entered and identified as covariates of larger aortic root diameter were older age, male sex, and center (P<0.001), which accounted for 35% of the overall variability of aortic root diameter. After simultaneous adjustment was made for these significant covariates, the proportion of phenotypic variance due to additive genetic contribution or residual heritability (h2) was 0.51 (SE=0.08, P<0.001). Additionally, simultaneous adjustment for height, weight, and systolic and diastolic BPs yielded slightly lower residual h2 of aortic root diameter (h2=0.44, SE=0.08, P<0.001), which accounted for 26% of the overall variance of aortic root size. Because center effects were identified as significant covariates in the analyses, h2 analyses were performed separately in Arizona, Oklahoma, and North/South Dakota centers, which confirmed that a significant proportion of the phenotypic variance of aortic root diameter is due to additive genetic contribution. Heredity explains a substantial proportion of the variability of aortic root size that is not accounted for by age, sex, body size, and blood pressure. Echocardiographic screening of family members with aortic root dilatation may identify other individuals predisposed to aortic dissection or rupture.
Key Words: genetics • epidemiology • echocardiography • aorta
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Aortic root dilatation is a major pathophysiological mechanism for aortic regurgitation in a variety of disorders and is found in as much as 30% of patients with severe pure aortic regurgitation in whom no valvular abnormality is apparent.1 Enlargement of the aortic root has also been associated with the occurrence of aortic dissection and/or rupture, which accounts for 1% to 2% of deaths in industrialized countries.2,3 The usual underlying pathologies, ie, abnormalities in aortic tissue associated with aortic dilatation, are summarized as cystic medial necrosis and are variable in severity.4,5 The aortic root diameter is strongly related to age, to body size,1,6 and, less strongly, to blood pressure (BP).7,8 However, only a small proportion of the variance of aortic root size can be explained by all of its known clinical and demographic variables.8,9 The present study was undertaken to determine the heritability of echocardiographically derived aortic root diameter in the American Indian participants in the second Strong Heart Study (SHS) examination.
|
Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The SHS is a population-based cohort study of cardiovascular risk factors and prevalent and incident cardiovascular disease in 13 American Indian tribes in Arizona, Oklahoma, and North and South Dakota, as previously described.10–13 The cohort included tribal members aged 45 to 74 years recruited from defined sampling frames of eligible individuals (overall participation rate 61%) for the first SHS examination between July 1989 and January 1992.
A total of 3637 SHS cohort members (89% of those alive) attended the second SHS examination from August 1993 to December 1995. The examination included medical history, ECG, measurement of brachial and ankle BP, a 2-hour 75-g glucose tolerance test, and determination of fasting glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, insulin, lipid, and lipoprotein levels. Anthropometric measurements were performed, and body mass index and waist/hip ratio were measured.11,12 Family history questionnaires were used to identify the parents and full or half siblings of the SHS participants. For the present study, all SHS participants with identified biological relatives in the cohort on the family history questionnaires were included in the analyses.
Echocardiographic Techniques and Measurements
As previously described,14,15 studies were performed by using phased-array echocardiographs with M-mode, 2D, pulsed, continuous, and color-flow Doppler capabilities. The correct orientation of the planes for imaging and Doppler recordings was verified by using standard procedures.16 Measurements were made by using a computerized review station equipped with a digitizing tablet and monitor screen overlay for calibration and performance of each needed measurement. The aortic root diameter was measured at the sinuses of Valsalva; the parasternal long-axis view maximized these dimensions.6 We have previously assessed the reliability of echocardiographic left ventricular structure and function.17 Analysis of reliability of aortic root measurements in the same study yielded an intraclass correlation coefficient (
value) of 0.79 (P<0.001). Measurements of the ascending thoracic aorta, aortic arch, and descending thoracic aorta were not part of the SHS echocardiographic protocol.
Bicuspid aortic valve or valve calcification were determined by visualization of the valve in long- and short-axis views. Aortic regurgitation was identified on the basis of the extent of diastolic turbulent flow, indicated by a variance signal in the left ventricle, as previously described in detail.18
Heritability and Statistical Analyses
Heritability calculations were performed by using a general pedigree variance-component method in which the phenotypic covariance among relatives was used to simultaneously estimate the proportion of variance in the trait due to the additive effects of genes (ie, the additive genetic heritability [h2]) and the effects of a variety of measured covariates. The quantitative phenotype for individual i, yi, can be written as a simple linear function as follows:
|
|
where µ is the mean of the trait, ßj is the regression coefficient of the covariate j, xij is the value of the covariate j in the individual i, and gi and ei represent the random deviations from µ for the individual i values that are attributable to additive genetic and unmeasured environmental effects, respectively. The effects of gi and ei are assumed to be uncorrelated with one another and are normally distributed with mean 0 and variances 
g and e. The likelihood of the phenotypes of the family members is assumed to follow a multivariate normal distribution, although such an assumption can be violated without a substantial effect on its conclusions,19 and the phenotypic covariance matrix is modeled as a function of the coefficient of relationship between individuals and the additive genetic and environmental variances. Once the expected mean and the covariance matrix of each pedigree are defined, the likelihood of a pedigree is evaluated by using the multivariate normal density function and summed over all pedigrees. The general variance component method is implemented in the computer analysis program SOLAR,20 which uses the computer programs FISHER and SEARCH for likelihood optimization in quantitative trait analysis.21 By use of the variance component model, probability values for the h2s were obtained by likelihood ratio tests, for which the likelihood of a model in which the h2 is estimated is compared with the likelihood of the model in which the h2 is constrained to 0. Twice the difference in these logarithmic likelihoods is asymptotically distributed as a 1/2:1/2 mixture of a 
2 variable with 1 df and a point mass at 0.22
One potential limitation of adjusting the phenotype under study for all its known covariates is that genes that influence covariates may parallel those that influence the trait, thereby attenuating its residual h2. Thus, 2 covariate adjustment strategies were used: the first model simultaneously adjusted for age, sex, and center; the second model additionally simultaneously adjusted for height, weight, and systolic and diastolic BPs. To estimate the proportions of the total variance of aortic root dimensions associated with clinical covariates and with the additive effects of genes, the percentage of variance due to conventional covariates was estimated as the multiple R2x100, and the percentage of residual variance associated with the additive genetic contribution was estimated as the following product: h2x(100-percentage of variance attributed to clinical covariates).
Clinical and echocardiographic data are presented as mean±SD for continuous variables and as proportions for categorical variables. Data management and analysis were performed by using SPSS 9.0 (SPSS Inc) software. Genetic and pedigree data management was performed by using the PEDSYS data management system (Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research).23 Center effects were assessed by using dummy variables for Arizona and North/South Dakota residence. A 2-tailed value of P<0.05 indicated statistical significance in all analyses.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Clinical Characteristics of SHS Participants
Of the 3502 SHS participants who underwent echocardiography in the second examination, 1373 participants had biological relatives participating in the study and, thus, could be included in the h2 analyses, whereas 2129 participants could not be placed in pedigrees. The 1373 related individuals, from 445 families, formed 1305 relative pairs, mostly siblings (1077 pairs) as well as parents, half-siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, nieces, and nephews in multigenerational families. There were no significant differences in the demographic characteristics of the SHS participants who were included in the h2 analyses compared with those of the remaining participants in the second SHS examination who were not in the analyzed families (Table 1). Similarly, there were no statistical differences in the mean aortic root diameter (3.5±0.4 versus 3.4±0.4 cm, P=NS) of the 1373 participants in the present h2 analysis and the remaining 2129 SHS participants who underwent echocardiography.
|
Prevalence of Conditions Associated With Aortic Root Dilatation
The prevalence of aortic regurgitation did not differ statistically between the SHS participants in the present h2 analysis (9.5%) and the remaining SHS participants with echocardiograms (10.5%, 2=2.4, P=NS). Similarly, the prevalence of at least mild aortic stenosis in SHS participants in the present h2 analysis (1.0%) and in the remaining SHS participants with echocardiograms did not differ statistically (0.6%, 2=2.1, P=NS). There were 5 participants in the analyzed families who had bicuspid aortic valve compared with 4 in the remaining 2129 SHS participants.
Heritability of Aortic Root Size
In a polygenic model, the variables entered and identified as covariates of larger aortic root diameter were older age, male sex, and center (P<0.001), which accounted for 35% of the overall variability of aortic root diameter. After simultaneous adjustment was made for these significant covariates, the proportion of phenotypic variance due to additive genetic contribution or residual h2 was 0.51 (SE=0.08, P<0.001). After an additional simultaneous adjustment was made for height, weight, and systolic and diastolic BPs, the residual h2 of aortic root diameter was reduced to 0.44 (SE=0.08, P<0.001), which accounted for 26% of the overall variance of aortic root size.
Because center effects were identified as significant covariates in the analyses, h2 analyses were performed separately in the 3 SHS centers. Table 2 summarizes the substantial residual h2 of aortic root diameter of the analyzed families from each SHS center after an initial simultaneous adjustment was made for age and sex and then an additional simultaneous adjustment was made for age, sex, height, weight, and systolic and diastolic BPs.
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
To our knowledge, the present study is the first to assess the heritability of aortic root size in a large population-based sample. Our study indicates that a substantial proportion of the total phenotypic variance of aortic root diameter (26%) is due to the additive effects of genes, after simultaneous adjustment for age, sex, height, weight, and systolic and diastolic BPs. Our study also indicates that genetic influences on aortic root size are robust among the 3 study centers. Studies in twins have provided initial evidence that heredity influences aortic root size. In a study of 53 monozygotic and dizygotic twin pairs, Bielen et al24 found that biological inheritance was responsible for 68% (P<0.001) of the phenotypic variance of aortic diameter, after adjustment was made for body weight. However, because twins share environmental factors to a unique degree,25 h2 estimates that include this shared environmental component in twins are almost always higher than estimates derived from other relatives.
Previous studies of genetic effects on aortic size have focused on the genetic causes of abdominal aneurysms. Tilson and Seashore26 were among the first to report a relatively high familial incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysms, and subsequently, several other groups have confirmed that abdominal aortic aneurysms are familial.27–30 Familial forms of ascending aortic aneurysms have also been reported, suggesting that a genetic defect may be the cause of some ascending aortic aneurysms.31,32 Milewicz et al33 demonstrated that mutations in the FBN-1 gene, which encodes for fibrillin-1, a protein found in elastic fiber–associated microfibrils, occur in patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms with no evidence of Marfan’s syndrome. However, recent research suggests that familial aortic aneurysms may be genetically heterogeneous.34,35 Further studies are needed to identify genetic loci influencing aortic size in population-based samples.
The Framingham Heart Study has found that age, height, weight, and sex were the principal determinants of aortic root dimensions.9 The impact of BP on aortic root dimensions, independent of age and body size, remains controversial.1,8,9 We have previously demonstrated that aortic diameters increase with increasing quartiles of diastolic and systolic BPs, particularly at the supraortic ridge and ascending aorta but not at the sinuses of Valsalva.8 In multivariate analysis, BP remained an independent determinant of distal aortic diameters after body size and age were considered.8 More recently, we have found a lack of association between BP and aortic root measurements at the sinuses of Valsalva in a population-based sample of hypertensive adults36 and in a clinical cohort of hypertensive adults with ECG-determined left ventricular hypertrophy.37 In the SHS, older age, male sex, body size, and BP were found to be significant covariates of aortic root diameter and contributed to 40% of the overall variability of aortic root diameter at the level of the sinuses of Valsalva. Furthermore, the present study indicates that an additional 26% of the overall variability of aortic root size is due to additive genetic effects. Of note, there was minimal attenuation of the residual of aortic root size after full covariate adjustment, suggesting that genetic markers affecting body size and BP are distinct from those influencing aortic root size. Our findings of substantial residual h2 of echocardiographically determined aortic root diameter suggest that echocardiographic screening of family members with aortic dilatation may identify additional family members predisposed to aortic dissection or rupture.
A long-term goal of the present study is to detect and map new polymorphic genes that influence variation in aortic root size and thereby contribute to the development of asymptomatic subclinical aortic dilatation and, subsequently, to aortic regurgitation, dissection, or rupture. The first necessary step in this process is to determine that there is substantial h2 of aortic size that is independent of known confounding variables in members of the general population. The SHS is particularly suited for this purpose because its population-based cohort is unlikely to have a sufficient number of individuals with uncommon mendelian disorders such as Marfan’s syndrome (with a population prevalence of 1:5000 to 1:10 000)38 included in the present analyses to contribute improbably to the evidence that we have obtained of strong genetic influences to aortic root size. However, it is possible that unmeasured environmental factors are potentially inflating our h2 estimates in this population-based sample. Therefore, other population-based studies on genetic factors influencing aortic size need to be performed. Studies that seek to identify specific genetic markers that determine aortic root size are currently being undertaken in the SHS, which may lead to improvement in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in the prevention of aortic root dilatation and its complications.
In conclusion, heredity explains a substantial proportion of the variability of aortic root size that is not accounted for by age, sex, body size, and BP. Echocardiographic screening of family members with aortic root dilatation may identify other individuals predisposed to aortic dissection or rupture.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
This study was supported by cooperative agreements U01-HL-41642, U01-HL-41652, and U01-HL-41654 and grant M10RR0047-34 (General Clinical Research Center) from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md. We would like to thank the Indian Health Service, the SHS participants, and participating tribal communities for the extraordinary cooperation and involvement that made this study possible and also the study center coordinators and the SHS data managers.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Indian Health Service.
Received December 14, 2001; accepted March 26, 2002.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
1. Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Niles NW, Hochreiter C, Kligfield P, Sato N, Spitzer M, Borer JS. Aortic root dilatation as a cause of isolated, severe aortic regurgitation. Ann Intern Med. 1987; 106: 800–807.
2. Eisenberg MJ, Rice SA, Paraschos A, Caputo GR, Schiller NB. The clinical spectrum of patients with aneurysms of the ascending aorta. Am Heart J. 1993; 125: 1380–1385.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Bickerstaff LK, Pairolero PC, Hollier LH, Melton LJ, Van Peenen HJ, Cherry KJ, Joyce JW, Lie JT. Thoracic aortic aneurysms: a population-based study. Surgery. 1982; 92: 1103–1108.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Carlson RG, Lillehei CW, Edwards JE. Cystic medial necrosis of the ascending aorta in relation to age and hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 1970; 25: 411–415.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Schlatmann TJ, Becker AE. Pathogenesis of dissecting aneurysm of the aorta: comparative histologic study of significance of medial changes. Am J Cardiol. 1977; 39: 21–26.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Kramer– Fox, O’Loughlin J. Two-dimensional echocardiographic aortic root dimensions in normal children and adults. Am J Cardiol. 1989; 64: 507–512.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Waller BF, Zoltick JM, Rosen JH, Katz NM, Gomes MN, Fletcher RD, Wallace RB, Roberts WC. Severe aortic regurgitation form systemic hypertension (without aortic dissection) requiring aortic valve replacement: analysis of four patients. Am J Cardiol. 1982; 49: 473–477.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Kim M, Roman MJ, Cavallini C, Scwhartz JE, Pickering TG, Devereux RB. Effect of hypertension on aortic root size and prevalence of aortic regurgitation. Hypertension. 1996; 28: 47–52.
9.
Vasan RS, Larson MG, Levy D. Determinants of echocardiographic aortic root size: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1995; 91: 734–740.
10. Lee ET, Welty TK, Fabsitz R, Cowan LD, Le NA, Oopik AJ, Cucchiara AJ, Savage PJ, Howard BV. The Strong Heart Study: a study of cardiovascular disease in American Indians: design and methods. Am J Epidemiol. 1990; 13: 1141–1155.
11.
Welty TK, Lee ET, Yeh J, Cowan LD, Go O, Fabsitz RR, Le NA, Oopik AJ, Robbins DC, Howard BV. Cardiovascular disease risk factors among American Indians: the Strong Heart Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1995; 142: 269–287.
12.
Howard BV, Lee ET, Cowan LD, Fabsitz RR, Howard WJ, Oopik AJ, Yeh J, Robbins DC, Welty TK. Coronary heart disease prevalence and its relation to risk factors in American Indians: the Strong Heart Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1995; 142: 254–268.
13. Howard BV, Welty TK, Fabsitz R, Cowan LD, Oopik AJ, Le NA, Yeh J, Savage PJ, Lee ET. Risk factors in coronary heart disease in diabetic and non-diabetic Native Americans. Diabetes. 1992; 41 (suppl 2): 4–11.
14. Devereux RB, Roman MJ, Paranicas M, O’Grady MJ, Woods EA, Howard BV, Welty TK, Lee ET, Fabsitz RR. Relations of Doppler stroke distance and its components to left ventricular stroke volume in normotensive and hypertensive American Indians: the Strong Heart Study. Am J Hypertens. 1997; 10: 619–628.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Devereux RB, Roman MJ, de Simone G, O’Grady MJ, Paranicas M, Yeh JL, Fabsitz RR, Howard BV. Relations of left ventricular mass to demographic and hemodynamic variables in American Indians: the Strong Heart Study. Circulation. 1997; 96: 1416–1423.
16. Devereux RB, Roman MJ. Evaluation of cardiac and vascular structure by echocardiography and other noninvasive techniques.In: Laragh JH, Brenner BM, eds. Hypertension: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Treatment. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1995: 1969–1985.
17.
Palmieri V, Dahlof B, DeQuattro V, Sharpe N, Bella JN, de Simone G, Paranicas M, Fishman D, Devereux RB. Reliability of echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular structure and function: the PRESERVE Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 34: 1625–1632.
18.
Lebowitz NE, Bella JN, Roman MJ, Liu JE, Fishman D, Paranicas M, Lee ET, Fabsitz RR, Welty TK, Howard BV, Devereux RB. Prevalence and correlates of aortic regurgitation in American Indians: the Strong Heart Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36: 461–467.
19. Beaty TH, Self SG, Liang KY, Connolly MA, Chase GA, Kwiterovich PO. Use of robust variance components models to analyze triglyceride data in families. Am J Hum Genet. 1985; 49: 315–328.
20. Almasy L, Blangero J. Multipoint quantitative trait linkage analysis in general pedigrees. Am J Hum Genet. 1998; 62: 1198–1211.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Lange K, Weels D, Boehnke M. Programs for pedigree analysis: MENDEL, FISHER and dGENE. Genet Epidemiol. 1988; 5: 471–472.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Self SG, Liang KY. Asymptomatic properties of maximum likelihood estimators and likelihood ratio tests under nonstandard conditions. J Am Stat Assoc. 1987; 82: 605–610.[CrossRef]
23. Dyke B. PEDSYS User’s Manual: PGL Technical Report No. 2. San Antonio, Tex: Population Genetics Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research; 1996.
24. Bielen E, Fagard R, Amery A. The inheritance of left ventricular structure and function assessed by imaging and Doppler echocardiography. Am Heart J. 1991; 121: 1743–1749.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Christian JC, Kang KW, Norton JA. Choice of an estimate of genetic variance from twin data. Am J Hum Genet. 1974; 26: 154–161.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Tilson MD, Seashore MR. Fifty families with abdominal aortic aneurysms in two or more first order relatives. Am J Surg. 1984; 147: 551–553.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Bengtsson H, Norrgard O, Angquist KA, Ekberg O, Oberg L, Bergqvist D. Ultrasonographic screening of the abdominal aorta among siblings of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg. 1989; 76: 589–591.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Johansen K, Koepsell T. Familial tendency for abdominal aortic aneurysms. JAMA. 1986; 256: 1934–1936.
29. Majumder PP, St. Jean PL, Ferrell RE, Webster MW, Steed DL. On the inheritance of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Am J Hum Genet. 1991; 48: 164–170.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Kuivaneimi H, Tromp G, Prockop D. Genetic causes of aortic aneurysms. J Clin Invest. 1991; 88: 1441–1444.
31. Nicod P, Bloor C, Godfrey M, Hollister D, Pyeritz RE, Dittrich H, Polikar R, Peterson KL. Familial aortic dissecting aneurysm. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989; 13: 811–819.[Abstract]
32. Francke U, Berg MA, Tynan K, Brenn T, Liu W, Aoyama T, Gasner C, Miller DC, Furthmayr H. A gly-1127-ser mutation in EGF-like domain of the fibrillin-1 gene is a risk factor for ascending aortic aneurysm and dissection. Am J Hum Genet. 1995; 56: 1287–1296.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Milewicz DM, Michael K, Fisher N, Cosello JS, Markello T, Biddinger A. Fibrillin-1 (FBN-1) mutation in patients with thoracic aneurysms. Circulation. 1996; 94: 2708–2711.
34.
Guo D, Hassan S, Kuang S-Q, Vaughan CJ, Boerwinkle E, Chen H, Abuelo D, Dietz HC, Basson CT, Shete SS, Milewicz DM. Familial aortic aneurysms and dissections: genetic heterogeneity with a major locus mapping to 5q13-14. Circulation. 2001; 103: 2461–2468.
35.
Vaughan CJ, Casey M, He J, Veugelers M, Henderson K, Guo D, Campagna R, Roman MJ, Milewicz DM, Devereux RB, Basson CT. Identification of a chromosome 11q23.2-q24 locus for familial aortic aneurysm disease, a genetically heterogeneous disorder. Circulation. 2001; 103: 2469–2475.
36.
Palmieri V, Bella JN, Arnett DK, Roman MJ, Oberman A, Kitzman DW, Hopkins P, Paranicas M, Rao DC, Devereux RB. Aortic root dilatation at the sinuses of Valsalva and aortic regurgitation in normotensive and hypertensive adults: the HyperGEN Study. Hypertension. 2001; 37: 1229–1235.
37. Bella JN, Wachtell K, Boman K, Palmieri V, Papademetriou V, Gerdts E, Aalto T, Olofsson M, Olsen MH, Dahlof B, Roman MJ, Devereux RB. Relation of left ventricular geometry and function to aortic root dilatation in patients with systemic hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (the LIFE Study). Am J Cardiol. 2002; 89: 337–341.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. de Paepe A, Devereux RB, Dietz HC, Hennekam RC, Pyeritz RE. Revised diagnostic criteria for the Marfan syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 1996; 62: 417–426.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  R. S. Vasan, N. L. Glazer, J. F. Felix, W. Lieb, P. S. Wild, S. B Felix, N. Watzinger, M. G. Larson, N. L. Smith, A. Dehghan, et al. Genetic Variants Associated With Cardiac Structure and Function: A Meta-analysis and Replication of Genome-wide Association Data JAMA, July 8, 2009; 302(2): 168 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J R Ortlepp, M Pillich, V Mevissen, C Krantz, M Kimmel, R Autschbach, G Langebartels, J Erdmann, R Hoffmann, and K Zerres APOE alleles are not associated with calcific aortic stenosis Heart, October 1, 2006; 92(10): 1463 - 1466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Jiang, K. M. Godfrey, C. N. Martyn, and C. R. Gale Birth Weight and Cardiac Structure in Children Pediatrics, February 1, 2006; 117(2): e257 - e261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Agmon, B. K. Khandheria, I. Meissner, G. L. Schwartz, J. D. Sicks, A. J. Fought, W. M. O'Fallon, D. O. Wiebers, and A. J. Tajik Is aortic dilatation an atherosclerosis-related process?: Clinical, laboratory, and transesophageal echocardiographiccorrelates of thoracic aortic dimensions in the populationwith implications for thoracic aortic aneurysm formation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 17, 2003; 42(6): 1076 - 1083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||