| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atherosclerosis and Lipoproteins |
From Department of Medicine (J.N.B., M.J.R., R.B.D.), Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; the Department of Genetics (J.W.M., L.A., K.E.N.), Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research, San Antonio, Tex; Aberdeen Area Tribal Chairmens Health Board (T.K.W.), Rapid City, SD; University of Oklahoma School of Public Health Services (E.T.L.), Oklahoma City; the Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications (R.R.F.), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Md; and Medstar Research Institute (B.V.H.), Washington, DC.
Correspondence to Jonathan N. Bella, MD, Division of Cardiology (12th Floor), Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1650 Grand Concourse, Bronx, NY 10457. E-mail jonnbella{at}earthlink.net Reprint requests to Richard B. Devereux, MD, Division of Cardiology, Box 222, The New York-Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th St; New York, NY 10021. E-mail rbdevere@med.cornell.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 family member in the cohort. Heritability calculations were performed by using variance component analysis as implemented in SOLAR, a computer analysis program. In a polygenic model, the variables entered and identified as covariates of larger aortic root diameter were older age, male sex, and center (P<0.001), which accounted for 35% of the overall variability of aortic root diameter. After simultaneous adjustment was made for these significant covariates, the proportion of phenotypic variance due to additive genetic contribution or residual heritability (h2) was 0.51 (SE=0.08, P<0.001). Additionally, simultaneous adjustment for height, weight, and systolic and diastolic BPs yielded slightly lower residual h2 of aortic root diameter (h2=0.44, SE=0.08, P<0.001), which accounted for 26% of the overall variance of aortic root size. Because center effects were identified as significant covariates in the analyses, h2 analyses were performed separately in Arizona, Oklahoma, and North/South Dakota centers, which confirmed that a significant proportion of the phenotypic variance of aortic root diameter is due to additive genetic contribution. Heredity explains a substantial proportion of the variability of aortic root size that is not accounted for by age, sex, body size, and blood pressure. Echocardiographic screening of family members with aortic root dilatation may identify other individuals predisposed to aortic dissection or rupture.
Key Words: genetics epidemiology echocardiography aorta
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A total of 3637 SHS cohort members (89% of those alive) attended the second SHS examination from August 1993 to December 1995. The examination included medical history, ECG, measurement of brachial and ankle BP, a 2-hour 75-g glucose tolerance test, and determination of fasting glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, insulin, lipid, and lipoprotein levels. Anthropometric measurements were performed, and body mass index and waist/hip ratio were measured.11,12 Family history questionnaires were used to identify the parents and full or half siblings of the SHS participants. For the present study, all SHS participants with identified biological relatives in the cohort on the family history questionnaires were included in the analyses.
Echocardiographic Techniques and Measurements
As previously described,14,15 studies were performed by using phased-array echocardiographs with M-mode, 2D, pulsed, continuous, and color-flow Doppler capabilities. The correct orientation of the planes for imaging and Doppler recordings was verified by using standard procedures.16 Measurements were made by using a computerized review station equipped with a digitizing tablet and monitor screen overlay for calibration and performance of each needed measurement. The aortic root diameter was measured at the sinuses of Valsalva; the parasternal long-axis view maximized these dimensions.6 We have previously assessed the reliability of echocardiographic left ventricular structure and function.17 Analysis of reliability of aortic root measurements in the same study yielded an intraclass correlation coefficient (
value) of 0.79 (P<0.001). Measurements of the ascending thoracic aorta, aortic arch, and descending thoracic aorta were not part of the SHS echocardiographic protocol.
Bicuspid aortic valve or valve calcification were determined by visualization of the valve in long- and short-axis views. Aortic regurgitation was identified on the basis of the extent of diastolic turbulent flow, indicated by a variance signal in the left ventricle, as previously described in detail.18
Heritability and Statistical Analyses
Heritability calculations were performed by using a general pedigree variance-component method in which the phenotypic covariance among relatives was used to simultaneously estimate the proportion of variance in the trait due to the additive effects of genes (ie, the additive genetic heritability [h2]) and the effects of a variety of measured covariates. The quantitative phenotype for individual i, yi, can be written as a simple linear function as follows:
|
|
where µ is the mean of the trait, ßj is the regression coefficient of the covariate j, xij is the value of the covariate j in the individual i, and gi and ei represent the random deviations from µ for the individual i values that are attributable to additive genetic and unmeasured environmental effects, respectively. The effects of gi and ei are assumed to be uncorrelated with one another and are normally distributed with mean 0 and variances
g and
e. The likelihood of the phenotypes of the family members is assumed to follow a multivariate normal distribution, although such an assumption can be violated without a substantial effect on its conclusions,19 and the phenotypic covariance matrix is modeled as a function of the coefficient of relationship between individuals and the additive genetic and environmental variances. Once the expected mean and the covariance matrix of each pedigree are defined, the likelihood of a pedigree is evaluated by using the multivariate normal density function and summed over all pedigrees. The general variance component method is implemented in the computer analysis program SOLAR,20 which uses the computer programs FISHER and SEARCH for likelihood optimization in quantitative trait analysis.21 By use of the variance component model, probability values for the h2s were obtained by likelihood ratio tests, for which the likelihood of a model in which the h2 is estimated is compared with the likelihood of the model in which the h2 is constrained to 0. Twice the difference in these logarithmic likelihoods is asymptotically distributed as a 1/2:1/2 mixture of a
2 variable with 1 df and a point mass at 0.22
One potential limitation of adjusting the phenotype under study for all its known covariates is that genes that influence covariates may parallel those that influence the trait, thereby attenuating its residual h2. Thus, 2 covariate adjustment strategies were used: the first model simultaneously adjusted for age, sex, and center; the second model additionally simultaneously adjusted for height, weight, and systolic and diastolic BPs. To estimate the proportions of the total variance of aortic root dimensions associated with clinical covariates and with the additive effects of genes, the percentage of variance due to conventional covariates was estimated as the multiple R2x100, and the percentage of residual variance associated with the additive genetic contribution was estimated as the following product: h2x(100-percentage of variance attributed to clinical covariates).
Clinical and echocardiographic data are presented as mean±SD for continuous variables and as proportions for categorical variables. Data management and analysis were performed by using SPSS 9.0 (SPSS Inc) software. Genetic and pedigree data management was performed by using the PEDSYS data management system (Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research).23 Center effects were assessed by using dummy variables for Arizona and North/South Dakota residence. A 2-tailed value of P<0.05 indicated statistical significance in all analyses.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Prevalence of Conditions Associated With Aortic Root Dilatation
The prevalence of aortic regurgitation did not differ statistically between the SHS participants in the present h2 analysis (9.5%) and the remaining SHS participants with echocardiograms (10.5%,
2=2.4, P=NS). Similarly, the prevalence of at least mild aortic stenosis in SHS participants in the present h2 analysis (1.0%) and in the remaining SHS participants with echocardiograms did not differ statistically (0.6%,
2=2.1, P=NS). There were 5 participants in the analyzed families who had bicuspid aortic valve compared with 4 in the remaining 2129 SHS participants.
Heritability of Aortic Root Size
In a polygenic model, the variables entered and identified as covariates of larger aortic root diameter were older age, male sex, and center (P<0.001), which accounted for 35% of the overall variability of aortic root diameter. After simultaneous adjustment was made for these significant covariates, the proportion of phenotypic variance due to additive genetic contribution or residual h2 was 0.51 (SE=0.08, P<0.001). After an additional simultaneous adjustment was made for height, weight, and systolic and diastolic BPs, the residual h2 of aortic root diameter was reduced to 0.44 (SE=0.08, P<0.001), which accounted for 26% of the overall variance of aortic root size.
Because center effects were identified as significant covariates in the analyses, h2 analyses were performed separately in the 3 SHS centers. Table 2 summarizes the substantial residual h2 of aortic root diameter of the analyzed families from each SHS center after an initial simultaneous adjustment was made for age and sex and then an additional simultaneous adjustment was made for age, sex, height, weight, and systolic and diastolic BPs.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous studies of genetic effects on aortic size have focused on the genetic causes of abdominal aneurysms. Tilson and Seashore26 were among the first to report a relatively high familial incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysms, and subsequently, several other groups have confirmed that abdominal aortic aneurysms are familial.2730 Familial forms of ascending aortic aneurysms have also been reported, suggesting that a genetic defect may be the cause of some ascending aortic aneurysms.31,32 Milewicz et al33 demonstrated that mutations in the FBN-1 gene, which encodes for fibrillin-1, a protein found in elastic fiberassociated microfibrils, occur in patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms with no evidence of Marfans syndrome. However, recent research suggests that familial aortic aneurysms may be genetically heterogeneous.34,35 Further studies are needed to identify genetic loci influencing aortic size in population-based samples.
The Framingham Heart Study has found that age, height, weight, and sex were the principal determinants of aortic root dimensions.9 The impact of BP on aortic root dimensions, independent of age and body size, remains controversial.1,8,9 We have previously demonstrated that aortic diameters increase with increasing quartiles of diastolic and systolic BPs, particularly at the supraortic ridge and ascending aorta but not at the sinuses of Valsalva.8 In multivariate analysis, BP remained an independent determinant of distal aortic diameters after body size and age were considered.8 More recently, we have found a lack of association between BP and aortic root measurements at the sinuses of Valsalva in a population-based sample of hypertensive adults36 and in a clinical cohort of hypertensive adults with ECG-determined left ventricular hypertrophy.37 In the SHS, older age, male sex, body size, and BP were found to be significant covariates of aortic root diameter and contributed to 40% of the overall variability of aortic root diameter at the level of the sinuses of Valsalva. Furthermore, the present study indicates that an additional 26% of the overall variability of aortic root size is due to additive genetic effects. Of note, there was minimal attenuation of the residual of aortic root size after full covariate adjustment, suggesting that genetic markers affecting body size and BP are distinct from those influencing aortic root size. Our findings of substantial residual h2 of echocardiographically determined aortic root diameter suggest that echocardiographic screening of family members with aortic dilatation may identify additional family members predisposed to aortic dissection or rupture.
A long-term goal of the present study is to detect and map new polymorphic genes that influence variation in aortic root size and thereby contribute to the development of asymptomatic subclinical aortic dilatation and, subsequently, to aortic regurgitation, dissection, or rupture. The first necessary step in this process is to determine that there is substantial h2 of aortic size that is independent of known confounding variables in members of the general population. The SHS is particularly suited for this purpose because its population-based cohort is unlikely to have a sufficient number of individuals with uncommon mendelian disorders such as Marfans syndrome (with a population prevalence of 1:5000 to 1:10 000)38 included in the present analyses to contribute improbably to the evidence that we have obtained of strong genetic influences to aortic root size. However, it is possible that unmeasured environmental factors are potentially inflating our h2 estimates in this population-based sample. Therefore, other population-based studies on genetic factors influencing aortic size need to be performed. Studies that seek to identify specific genetic markers that determine aortic root size are currently being undertaken in the SHS, which may lead to improvement in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in the prevention of aortic root dilatation and its complications.
In conclusion, heredity explains a substantial proportion of the variability of aortic root size that is not accounted for by age, sex, body size, and BP. Echocardiographic screening of family members with aortic root dilatation may identify other individuals predisposed to aortic dissection or rupture.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received December 14, 2001; accepted March 26, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J R Ortlepp, M Pillich, V Mevissen, C Krantz, M Kimmel, R Autschbach, G Langebartels, J Erdmann, R Hoffmann, and K Zerres APOE alleles are not associated with calcific aortic stenosis Heart, October 1, 2006; 92(10): 1463 - 1466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Jiang, K. M. Godfrey, C. N. Martyn, and C. R. Gale Birth Weight and Cardiac Structure in Children Pediatrics, February 1, 2006; 117(2): e257 - e261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Agmon, B. K. Khandheria, I. Meissner, G. L. Schwartz, J. D. Sicks, A. J. Fought, W. M. O'Fallon, D. O. Wiebers, and A. J. Tajik Is aortic dilatation an atherosclerosis-related process?: Clinical, laboratory, and transesophageal echocardiographiccorrelates of thoracic aortic dimensions in the populationwith implications for thoracic aortic aneurysm formation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 17, 2003; 42(6): 1076 - 1083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2002 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |