Thrombosis |
From the Department of Internal Medicine, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC.
Correspondence to Ruth Ann Henriksen, Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, East Carolina University, 600 Moye Blvd, Greenville NC 27858-4354. E-mail henriksenr@ mail.ecu.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: thromboxane platelets thrombin PAR-1 PAR-4
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although many actions of thrombin in the activation of platelets, including stimulation of a [Ca2+] i flux, platelet aggregation, and granule release, may be explained by the action of thrombin on PAR-1, other reports suggest that this receptor does not account for the total response of human platelets.410 Stimulation of PAR-4 also produces platelet aggregation and [Ca2+] i fluxes, but specific features of the latter response differ from those observed following PAR-1 stimulation.2,11
The present studies were undertaken to determine whether PAR-4 contributes to thromboxane production by human platelets and whether stimulation of this receptor accounts for the difference in thromboxane production observed for human platelets stimulated by thrombin compared with specific stimulation of PAR-1 by a peptide agonist.5 Because thromboxane, like thrombin, is a potent platelet agonist, understanding the mechanism by which it is produced may contribute to strategies for limiting its production and the prevention of thrombosis.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-thrombin (thrombin) was prepared as described.13
Platelets
Blood was obtained by the two-syringe technique after obtaining informed consent from healthy, nonsmoking adults denying use of antiplatelet medication for 10 days before phlebotomy. Whole blood, 6 vol, was anticoagulated with 1 vol acid citrate dextrose A (748 mmol/L sodium citrate, 38 mmol/L citric acid, 136 mmol/L glucose). These studies were approved by the University and Medical Center Institutional Review Board at East Carolina University, and all procedures were in accordance with institutional guidelines. Platelets were prepared by differential centrifugation and washed three times essentially as described previously except that 1 U/mL heparin was included in the first wash.5 For aspirin-treated platelets, the initial platelet pellet was resuspended in buffer to which aspirin was added at a final concentration of 200 µmol/L, and the platelets were incubated at 37°C for 20 minutes. After the third wash, platelets were resuspended in platelet buffer containing (in mmol/L) HEPES 10, NaCl 137, KCl 2.7, NaH2PO4 0.36, MgCl2 1, glucose 5.6, pH 7.4, and 3.5 mg/mL bovine serum albumin. After counting, platelets were diluted in the same buffer, and 1.0 mol/L CaCl2 was added to yield a final concentration of 1.0 mmol/L Ca2+. Experiments were performed at final platelet counts of 2.6 to 3.1x108/mL. Platelet aggregation was performed, in the absence of added fibrinogen, at 37°C with stirring at 1000 rpm, and light transmission was monitored with a Chrono-log Whole Blood Aggregometer, Model 560. For thromboxane determination, the platelet suspension was centrifuged for 1 minute at 16 000g, 5 minutes after addition of agonist to samples monitored for aggregation (without aspirin treatment). Platelet supernatants were stored at -80°C before assay. Thromboxane B2, the stable metabolite of thromboxane, was determined by competitive ELISA with reagents obtained from Neogen Corporation as described previously.5 In each experiment, responses were compared with that obtained for 100 nmol/L thrombin defined as 100%. For 5 minutes of incubation, this corresponded to 460±90 ng/mL thromboxane B2 for 108 platelets.
Genistein Inhibition
For studies of genistein inhibition, an 18 mmol/L stock solution in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was diluted into the platelet buffer. Platelets were preincubated for 2 minutes without stirring with either genistein at a final concentration of 60 µmol/L or with the platelet buffer, which contained DMSO. The final concentration of DMSO was 0.3%. For these studies, the incubation time for thromboxane production was 1.0 minute, followed by 1.0 minute of centrifugation. Thromboxane B2 was assayed as described above.
Statistics
All experiments were performed a minimum of three times with different platelet donors. Statistical significance was determined by t test with P<0.05 indicating significance.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
PAR-4Induced Thromboxane Production
To determine whether PAR-4 stimulation also results in thromboxane production, platelet supernatants were assayed for thromboxane B2. A dose-response curve for AYPGKF-induced thromboxane production is shown in Figure 2. These results suggest that maximal thromboxane production occurs at approximately 1 mmol/L AYPGKF, but that the maximal level of thromboxane produced is only about half of that obtained in response to 100 nmol/L thrombin. Thromboxane production in response to 1.0 mmol/L GYPGKF was less than 10% of that observed in response to 100 nmol/L thrombin. Figure 3 shows thromboxane production in response to the individual agonists 85 µmol/L SFLLRN and 480 µmol/L AYPGKF compared with the results obtained for simultaneous addition of the two agonists. Although the sum of the effects of the PAR-1 and PAR-4 agonists appears to be less than that obtained on simultaneous addition of these two agonists, this difference is not statistically significant (P>0.05). However, at these concentrations, the combined individual agonists do not yield a level of thromboxane equivalent to that obtained in response to 100 nmol/L thrombin. The concentrations of 85 µmol/L SFLLRN and 100 nmol/L thrombin were selected to give near maximal thromboxane responses for each agonist, as reported previously.5
|
|
PAR-4 Desensitization
To further characterize thromboxane production in response to PAR-4 stimulation, we determined whether this response could be desensitized by treatment with a low concentration of AYPGKF. Results of these studies, shown in Figure 4, indicate that the production of thromboxane in response to higher concentrations of AYPGKF or to thrombin is desensitized by a 40-minute preincubation of platelets with 45 µmol/L AYPGKF, a concentration sufficient to produce maximum aggregation. However, there is no desensitization of thromboxane production when platelets pretreated with AYPGKF are subsequently treated with the PAR-1 agonist, 85 µmol/L SFLLRN, indicating specificity in the responses initiated through PAR-1 and PAR-4.
|
Genistein Inhibition of PAR-4Induced Thromboxane Production
Previously, we reported that PAR-1independent thromboxane production was sensitive to inhibition by genistein.5 This was examined directly for the agonist AYPGKF by pretreating platelets with 60 µmol/L genistein for 2.0 minutes before addition of the agonist. Results of these studies, shown in Figure 5, indicate that the thromboxane production in response to all concentrations of AYPGKF is significantly inhibited by genistein. These findings suggest an essential role for a tyrosine kinase(s) in the stimulation of thromboxane production. However, identification of the specific site of inhibition by genistein awaits further investigation.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The identification of the peptide AYPGKF with a gain of function relative to the native human and murine sequences has facilitated investigation of the role of PAR-4 in cellular studies. Recent confirmation of the specificity of this PAR-4 peptide agonist comes from studies of PAR-4-/- murine platelets in which platelet aggregation and secretion were not observed in response to either 30 nmol/L thrombin or 500 µmol/L AYPGKF.15 The lack of response to thrombin by PAR-4-/- platelets also confirms the earlier conclusion that PAR-1 does not contribute to murine platelet activation16 and emphasizes the existence of distinct differences between the human and murine platelet responses.
Regulation of Thrombin-Induced Thromboxane Production
The presence on platelets of two receptors with differing affinities, specifically Km or EC50 values, for thrombin permits additional regulation of platelet responses such as aggregation, granule release, stimulation of [Ca2+]i fluxes, and thromboxane production. PAR-1 is rapidly desensitized,5 and as the thrombin concentration within a developing thrombus increases, platelets stimulated initially through PAR-1 at a low thrombin concentration (0.2 nmol/L) may continue to respond through PAR-4, reaching a maximum response at higher concentrations (100 nmol/L). Although the physiological relevance of high thrombin concentrations might be questioned, 100 nmol/L thrombin represents the conversion of less than 10% of circulating prothrombin to thrombin. Because thrombin is generated at the platelet surface, the local concentration in the forming thrombus will be considerably higher than in the circulation where additional protective mechanisms prevent extension of thrombi. Thromboxane is an extremely potent platelet-aggregating agent, and the physiological importance of this prostaglandin is evidenced, at least in part, by the efficacy of aspirin therapy, which is widely prescribed for prevention of both primary and secondary thrombotic events.
Densensitization of PAR-4
Examination of receptor desensitization in response to agonists permits identification of the roles of multiple receptors. We have previously reported the desensitization of thromboxane production by pretreatment of platelets with a PAR-1 agonist peptide at 20 µmol/L for either 2 or 10 minutes. Under these conditions, there was no further response to the PAR-1 agonist at 100 µmol/L, but the response to 100 nmol/L thrombin was nearly equivalent to that for platelets preincubated with only buffer.5 When platelets were preincubated with 5 nmol/L thrombin, desensitization was slower and a response to 100 nmol/L thrombin was still elicited after the 10-minute preincubation period. This incomplete desensitization to thrombin may be explained by the observation that down-regulation of the PAR-4 receptor is slow, apparently because of the lack of a phosphorylation site in the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain.17 In separate experiments, we found that the aggregation response to 1.0 mmol/L (total concentration) GYPGKF was eliminated after a 40-minute preincubation with 500 µmol/L GYPGKF. In the studies presented here, there was only a minimal effect on the aggregation response to 480 µmol/L AYPGKF after a 40-minute preincubation with 45 µmol/L AYPGKF (results not shown). We also observed that activation of PAR-4 does not desensitize the PAR-1 receptor on platelets with respect to thromboxane production (Figure 4) or aggregation (results not shown). Thus, PAR-1 and PAR-4 display not only the previously reported differences in thrombin concentration dependence for stimulation, but also a differing pattern of desensitization,14 which we have confirmed here for thromboxane production. This difference in receptor desensitization would permit response through PAR-4 for an extended period of time as the thrombin concentration increased in response to stimulation of prothrombinase activity at the platelet surface.
Maximal Thromboxane Production
The release of arachidonic acid from platelet phospholipids is mediated largely by cytoplasmic phospholipase A2 (cPLA2).1820 Previous work has shown that the amount of thromboxane produced in response to PAR-1 peptide agonists is roughly half of the maximal levels obtained in response to thrombin.5,9 Similarly, results presented here (Figure 2) show that the PAR-4 peptide agonist AYPGKF at 1 mmol/L also produces about half of the maximal amount of thromboxane observed in response to 100 nmol/L thrombin. Previously, 500 µmol/L AYPGKF was observed to be equivalent to 30 nmol/L thrombin in stimulating release of inositol phosphates from cultured cells expressing only the PAR-4 receptor.12 Our results, suggesting that neither PAR-1 nor PAR-4 stimulation is sufficient to induce maximal thromboxane production by platelets as well as the dependence of thromboxane production on agonist concentration, raise interesting questions concerning the regulation of eicosinoid production. The stimulation of either PAR-1 or PAR-4 appears to result not only in activation of thromboxane production, but also in the initiation of the attenuation of this response as well. This attenuation of response would serve to preserve the arachidonate-containing substrate for sustained release as the thrombin concentration increased. Although thromboxane production mediated by both PAR-1 and PAR-4 would appear to be dependent on cPLA2 activity, whether regulation of this response is at the level of cPLA2 or at a point proximal to signal initiation awaits further investigation of the role of other signaling intermediates. Because the activity of cPLA2 is at least partially dependent on Ca2+, attenuation of its activity may be associated with the decline in intracellular Ca2+ after cellular activation.
Results shown in Figure 3 indicate that the simultaneous addition of near maximal concentrations of PAR-1 and PAR-4 agonists results in approximately additive production of thromboxane compared with the addition of the individual agonists. However, in these experiments, the sum of these effects is not equivalent to that produced by 100 nmol/L thrombin. Possible explanations for this observation include 1) the concentrations of the peptide agonists used do not elicit the maximal response for these agonists and thus the sum is still less than that for 100 nmol/L thrombin, 2) there is still another thrombin-induced response, that is a third receptor, that results in thromboxane production, or more probably 3) there is a sequential effect in the stimulation of these two receptors such that products from the stimulation of PAR-1 enhance the stimulation of PAR-4. The first possibility provides at least a partial explanation for the levels of thromboxane observed. With respect to the second possibility, there is, at this time, an absence of additional evidence suggesting a third thrombin receptor on human platelets. The third possibility is supported by the previous observations that simultaneous addition of 2 mmol/L GYPGKF and 30 µmol/L SFLLRN does not elicit the same prolonged, platelet intracellular Ca2+ response as the addition of 20 nmol/L thrombin, suggesting a contribution from sequential activation of PAR-1 and PAR-4.11
Inhibition of Thromboxane Production by Genistein
Genistein is a nonspecific inhibitor of tyrosine kinases. Thus, it is probable that the effects of genistein are mediated by interaction with more than one signaling intermediate. It has been shown previously that the tyrosine kinase inhibitor herbimycin A does not inhibit thromboxane production by platelets under conditions in which the tyrosine kinase c-src is inhibited, 21 suggesting that the effects of genistein are not mediated by the inhibition of c-src, which is rapidly activated by thrombin.22 Our previous studies indicating that genistein was more effective in inhibition of PAR-1independent than PAR-1dependent thromboxane production suggest that the two receptors have a differential dependence on tyrosine kinase signaling pathways.5 Identification of specific tyrosine phosphorylation events linking these two receptors to thromboxane production awaits further investigation.
We have demonstrated that the PAR-4 agonist peptide AYPGKF stimulates thromboxane production by human platelets with the maximal response to this agonist being approximately half of that observed after maximal thrombin stimulation. The response to the PAR-4 agonist is additive with that observed in response to a PAR-1 agonist, and the PAR-4 mediated response is genistein-sensitive. Preincubation of platelets for 40 minutes with a low concentration of the PAR-4 agonist peptide partially desensitizes the thromboxane response to higher concentrations of the PAR-4 agonist or to thrombin stimulation, but not to the PAR-1 agonist peptide. Thus, PAR-1 and PAR-4 seem to account for the two previously proposed receptors that initiate thrombin-induced thromboxane production by human platelets.5
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received January 22, 2002; accepted February 11, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Kahn ML, Zheng Y, Huang W, Bigornia V, Zeng D, Moff S, Farese RV Jr, Tam C, Coughlin SR. A dual thrombin receptor system for platelet activation. Nature. 1998; 394: 690694.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Xu W, Andersen H, Whitmore T, Prensnell S, Yee D, Ching A, Gilbert T, Davie EW, Foster D. Cloning and characterization of human protease-activated receptor 4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95: 66426646.
4.
Henriksen RA, Brotherton AFA. Evidence that activation of platelets and endothelium by thrombin involves distinct sites of interaction. J Biol Chem. 1983; 258: 1371713721.
5.
Henriksen RA, Samokhin GP, Tracy PB. Thrombin-induced thromboxane synthesis by human platelets: properties of an anion binding exosite I-independent receptor [published correction appears in. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;18:1198]. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997; 17: 35193526.
6. Seiler SM, Goldenberg HJ, Michel IM, Hunt JT, Zavoico GB. Multiple pathways of thrombin-induced platelet activation differentiated by desensitization and a thrombin exosite inhibitor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991; 181: 636643.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Kinlough-Rathbone RL, Perry DW, Guccione MA, Rand ML, Packham MA. Degranulation of human platelets by the thrombin receptor peptide SFLLRN: comparison with degranulation by thrombin. Thrombos Haemostas. 1993; 70: 10191023.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Lau L-F, Pumiglia K, Côté YP, Feinstein MB. Thrombin-receptor agonist peptides, in contrast to thrombin itself, are not full agonists for activation and signal transduction in human platelets in the absence of platelet-derived secondary mediators. Biochem J. 1994; 303: 391400.
9.
Kramer RM, Roberts EF, Hyslop PA, Utterback BG, Hui KY, Jakubowski JA. Differential activation of cytosolic phospholipase A2(cPLA2) by thrombin and thrombin receptor agonist peptide in human platelets. J Biol Chem. 1995; 270: 1481614823.
10. Satoh K, Ozaki Y, Asazuma N, Yatomi Y, Ruomei Q, Kuroda K, Yang L, Kume S. Differential mobilization of tyrosine kinases in human platelets stimulated with thrombin or thrombin receptor agonist peptide. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996; 225: 10841089.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Covic L, Gresser AL, Kuliopulos A. Biphasic kinetics of activation and signaling for PAR1 and PAR4 thrombin receptors in platelets. Biochemistry. 2000; 39: 54585467.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Faruqi TR, Weiss EJ, Shapiro MJ, Huang W, Coughlin SR. Structure-function analysis of protease-activated receptor 4 tethered ligand peptides: determinants of specificity and utility in assays of receptor function. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 1972819734.
13. Henriksen RA, Owen WG, Nesheim ME, Mann KG. Identification of a congenital dysthrombin, Thrombin Quick. J Clin Invest. 1980; 66: 934940.
14. Kahn ML, Nakanishi-Matsui M, Shapiro MJ, Ishihara H, Coughlin SR. Protease-activated receptors 1 and 4 mediate activation of human platelets by thrombin. J Clin Invest. 1999; 103: 879887.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Sambrano GR, Weiss EJ, Zheng Y-W, Huang W, Coughlin SR. Role of thrombin signaling in platelets in haemostasis and thrombosis. Nature. 2001; 413: 7478.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Connolly AJ, Ishihara H, Kahn ML, Farese RV Jr, Coughlin SR. Role of the thrombin receptor in development and evidence for a second receptor. Nature. 1996; 381: 516519.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Shapiro MJ, Weiss EJ, Faruqi TR, Coughlin SR. Protease-activated receptors 1 and 4 are shut off with distinct kinetics after activation by thrombin. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 2521625221.
18.
Riendeau D, Guay J, Weech PK, Laliberte F, Yergey J, Li C, Desmarais S, Perrier H, Liu S, Nicoll-Griffith D. Arachidonyl trifluoromethyl ketone, a potent inhibitor of 85-kDa phospholipase A2, blocks production of arachidonate and 12-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid by calcium ionophore-challenged platelets. J Biol Chem. 1994; 269: 1561915624.
19.
Bartoli F, Lin HK, Ghomashchi F, Gelb MH, Jain MK, Apitz-Castro R. Tight binding inhibitors of 85-kDa phospholipase A2 but not 14-kDa phospholipase A2 inhibit release of free arachidonate in thrombin-stimulated human platelets. J Biol Chem. 1994; 269: 1562515630.
20. Sapirstein A, Bonventre JV. Specific physiological roles of cytosolic phospholipase A2 as defined by gene knockouts. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000; 1488: 139148.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Schoenwaelder SM, Jackson SP, Yuan Y, Teasdale MS, Salem HH, Mitchell CA. Tyrosine kinases regulate the cytoskeletal attachment of integrin alpha IIb beta 3 (platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa) and the cellular retraction of fibrin polymers. J Biol Chem. 1994; 269: 3247932487.
22.
Clark EA, Brugge JS. Redistribution of activated pp60c-src to integrin-dependent cytoskeletal complexes in thrombin-stimulated platelets. Mol Cell Biol. 1993; 13: 18631871.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Nagy Jr, K. Bhavaraju, T. Getz, Y. S. Bynagari, S. Kim, and S. P. Kunapuli Impaired activation of platelets lacking protein kinase C-{theta} isoform Blood, March 12, 2009; 113(11): 2557 - 2567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. F. Mercer, R. H. Johns, C. J. Scotton, M. A. Krupiczojc, M. Konigshoff, D. C. J. Howell, R. J. McAnulty, A. Das, A. J. Thorley, T. D. Tetley, et al. Pulmonary Epithelium Is a Prominent Source of Proteinase-activated Receptor-1-inducible CCL2 in Pulmonary Fibrosis Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2009; 179(5): 414 - 425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Fujiwara, E. Jin, M. Ghazizadeh, and O. Kawanami Activation of PAR4 Induces a Distinct Actin Fiber Formation via p38 MAPK in Human Lung Endothelial Cells J. Histochem. Cytochem., September 1, 2005; 53(9): 1121 - 1129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Steinhoff, J. Buddenkotte, V. Shpacovitch, A. Rattenholl, C. Moormann, N. Vergnolle, T. A. Luger, and M. D. Hollenberg Proteinase-Activated Receptors: Transducers of Proteinase-Mediated Signaling in Inflammation and Immune Response Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2005; 26(1): 1 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ATVB Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2002 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |